Why Syria is a Target
"The carpenter stretcheth out his rule; he marketh it out with a line; he fitteth it with planes, and he marketh it out with the compass, and maketh it after the figure of a man, according to the beauty of a man; that it may remain in the house."
Ox-Y-Gene: “Ox (first idol created by Israel) + Y (male chromosome and former letter representative of Alaph/Aleph in Syriac) + Gene (Genome of a species/ethnicity/heritage).
Pharmakia – Greek work meaning “poisoner”. It comes from the same word that Hebrew translates into “sorcery”. Now you know the origins of “art” of “medicine” which word means to “Med” = to measure, to limit + “cine” = fissure, to crack, split, germinate or sprout open. (Med-i-cine = to limit germination or sprouting of seed – see Genesis 30:37-42).
How did the “Ox” get into “Ox-Y-Gene”?
Why was the first “Idol” Israel forged out of gold during the exodus a “calf” (cow/ox)?
Why did Paul write “who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped the creature more than the creator” in Romans 1:25?
Gene-O-Cide: What is it REALLY going on in Syria, where Abraham Isaac and Jacob began?
Gene-O-Cide: Why was Aleppo named after the “Y” (First Letter in the Name of God and the “gene” after “ox” in “ox-y-gene”) which is the Alaph?.
Why the extreme push for Vaccines which include Animal DNA, Bovine and bird DNA, nutrient inhibitors, viral nagalase and heavy metals?
How does this compare with the Egyptian reliefs of human bodies with various animal heads and their knowledge of our DNA?
And finally, the prophecy in the scriptures, which the religion of “Science” denies as truth, but follows in tandem to accomplish what Daniel was told their “fathers have not done, nor his father’s fathers”?
Read your Bibles . . . you know where this is going . . .
On “Erasing the Syrian”, we covered the lineage from Laban and Abraham “The Syrian” all the way back through “Eber”. We also dissected the etymology of many of the names in the lineage and how those root words pertain to the “kingdom” within us, the substance with which we consist and the function of the names and what they really mean.
It’s like rebuilding the yellow brick road; but it’s not. That was already done when Christ laid down his life for us.
The last few paragraphs where we determined the difference between “Eber” (pass through) and Abram the Hebrew (Ibrim, to pass over).
The difference is subtle, but could mean the difference between another Babylon and the true Zion.
What Syria has to do with all this is not so much about geographical borders of countries, like the political state called “Israel”; but about the biological borders as the “truth” of the “pure language”; and he is being systematically obliterated both in the bio-physics labs and in the Middle East.
Despite the replacement of “the Syrian” in the Deuteronomy 26:5 passage with that of “an Aramean” and other such substitutions, “Syria” is mentioned in several passages pointing out a “switch” in language and identity. Israel began in Syria and the two have been interchangeable since Abraham, for example:
Deuteronomy 26:5 identifies Isaac and Abraham as Syrians before they were sent to Egypt.
Genesis 25:20 - identifies Bethuel, Abraham’s nephew, and Laban as Syrian.
2 Kings 16:5 – God sends King of Syria and King of Israel against Judah.
2 Kings 18:26 - Eliakim requests dialog in the Syrian instead of Jews language.
Ezra 4:6-7 – Accusation letter against Judah written in the Syrian and interpreted in Syrian.
Isaiah 17:3 – Remnant of Syria shall be as the glory of the children of Israel.
Daniel 2:4 – Chaldeans speak to Nebuchadnezzar in Syriak. Note: this evidence of Syriac appearing at least 560 B.C., before the first century A.D. claim in Wikipedia.
Hosea 12:12 – Recall of Jacob fleeing into Syria.
Matthew 4:24 – Syria the first nation which fame of Jesus went out.
Luke 2:2 – Cyrenius of Rome is made governor of Syria to include it in global tax.
Acts 15:41 – One of the first churches of Christ is confirmed in Syria by Apostle Paul.
Remember on “Erasing the Syrian”, we had established that Laban was Syrian, and Abraham, his great uncle, as well as Laban’s father, Bethuel (who was son of Nahor II, brother of Abraham and Milcah) were all Syrian.
Abraham is scripturally credited with being named the first “Hebrew” (which comes from Ibrim/Abram, meaning “to cross over”). Yet “Eber”, Abram/Abraham’s great-great-great-great grandfather, is credited in Jewish tradition, with the origin of the Hebrew Language.
When comparing the two, scripture doesn’t support this, but etymological genealogy comes close: Eber = “pass through/wade through” and Ibrim = “cross” or “pass over”.
We had also reviewed the evidence in both scripture and modern science, the plans of the “men of old, men of renown” to “change” the “Book of the Law” within us, and try to write God out of it.
The language presented today as “Hebrew” is not the “old language”. It is a script to reflect the changes they plan in the book within. Syria is being attacked today for a reason. Karaite Jews in Aleppo were being protected from “Judah” in the modern state calling itself “Israel” today for a reason.
The entirety of the Western world and it’s armies are blowing holes in Syria “for a reason”.
The covenant “passed over” Eber and to Abraham “for a reason”. Eber was alive during the building of the tower in Babylon. Arphaxad was his grandfather. Asshur, who built Resen, Calah and Nineveh was his great uncle. Was he involved?
Abraham was shown the Word of God; and he is the first to be called “Hebrew” in the scriptures. It was Abraham’s grandson Jacob who was chosen to be called “Israel” by God.
Jacob, who was the son of Isaac, who was the son of Abraham, who was the son of Terah, who was the son of Nahor I, who was the son of Serug, who was the son of Reu, who was the son of Peleg, who was the son of Eber, takes us to Salah, Eber’s father.
Salah, Father of Eber
We left off with “Eber” on the previous topic. Eber's father was "Shalah/Salah".
Luke chapter three lists the genealogy (as was supposed) of Joseph, Mary’s husband, mother of Jesus, but is actually the spiritual lineage because Jesus had no flesh and blood father. The Arabs have a name for this spiritual lineage (lineage of masters) or spiritual genealogy. It is called “Silsila” (the relationship of Samuel and Eli is a perfect example as Eli’s own sons were evil and Samuel was chosen by God, and Eli was his teacher).
Shalah and Salah both appear in the Bible as it states: Shalah in 1 Chronicles 12:18; and "Salah" in Genesis 10:21-24, and “Sala” in Luke 3:35 and the Septuagint.
There is some ambiguity here also as to who Salah's father is:
Just as the lineage differs for Jesus between Matthew 1 and Luke 3, so does the lineage of Selah differ (and the spelling with it). In Genesis 10:24, it is “Selah” who’s father is “Arphaxad”; but it is “Sala” in Luke 3:35-36 who’s father is “Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad”.
Did you notice that the /h/ is missing in the “generations, as was supposed” in Luke 3:35-36? Did you notice “Salah” did not have the /h/ at the end of his name and “Cainan” sits between Sela and “Arphaxad” in the generations?
Abram was given the /h/ in the midst of his name making it Abraham. Selah’s was taken away in the new testament when Cainan is listed as his father and not Arphaxad. Interesting.
Note: also on Wiki article for Salah:
"Seed of the Woman" is in reference to the scripture in Genesis 3:15, the "enmity" between the seed of the serpent and the seed of the woman. We will get to that later. This “line of the promised Seed of the Woman” is the generations listed in Luke 3.
Genesis 10 table of nations shows in Genesis 10:24 that Selah’s father is Arphaxad. In Luke 3:35-36 Sala’s (minus the /h/) father is “Cainan” who’s father is “Arphaxad”. So now what do we do?
There is something else that is interesting: “Salah” is a phonetic copy of the word “Selah”, which is found at the end of many of the scriptures in the Old Testament; especially that of the book of Psalms.
At the bottom of this article, it says Shelah might be related to the name "Saul". Jones translates this form of "Shalah" as "Prayer". This would agree with the spelling "Selah" at the end of David's various pauses in his Psalms. In Arabic, “Salah” is “prayer” (Etymonline). Interestingly the word “Shall” comes from the Germanic word “skal” meaning “I owe or I ought”.
In Arabic the "Salah/Selah" can appear as "Salaam" (Salem/JeruSALEM), a form of greeting for "peace".
Let's move on.
Arphaxad and Cainan
Salah is the son of both Arphaxad (Genesis 10:23-25 and most of the old testament); and is also the son of Cainan in Luke 3:35-36 (as was supposed, Joseph’s genealogy). Salah and Sala and Shalah are the same – Wikipedia.
He was allegedly born two years after the flood and he was the son of Shem. Looking at the big poster genealogy chart, I see no “Cainan” listed under Shem. The name “Cainan” actually appears as the son of Enoch, which would have been impossible for Salah to have as a father because no one made it through the flood but Noah, his three sons and their wives.
There is also a “Canaan” of a different spelling, who would have been a cousin of Salah by his uncle “Ham”. This Canaan was cursed by Noah when his father Ham neglected to cover Noah’s nakedness when Noah slept from drunkenness.
Further down on the article about “Arphaxad” it says:
Ur originates from a word meaning “original, earliest, primitive – out of original”. “Ur” is present in the word “Urim” from “Urim and Thumim”. Note what else it says in that section of the article? “Urfa of the Yazidis”. We covered the “Yazidis” before and the origins of their “Black Book”.
Ur and it’s offspring words include “aurochs” (ox) and “ore” – together produced a “golden calf” in Exodus .
According to this article, the reference "Sefer ha-Yashar" gives Cainan credit for the progenation of Astrology as taught by "the Watchers".
Abarim is confused on the meaning of Cainan. According to them it means either "lamenter" or "Possession".
Etymology Online gives for Cain "created one", "to form, fashion" + suffix "an", "one, lone, single, alone". Arphaxad’s father was “Shem”, father of the “Semites”:
It is believed that "Shem" was the "believing" son of Noah. The "Semitic Language" is sourced from the line of Shem. Shem means "the name" (see previous article "The Name"). It is also important to note that “Noah”, the father of Shem, was chosen by God to build the Ark because he was “perfect in his generations”.
He had not been corrupted with alien seed, animal seed and did not take part nor his father, in the bloodline of the sons of God who came down unto the daughters of men to transgress the bloodlines of man.
Jews believe that Shem may have been Melchizedek:
In Scripture this is disproven:
“For this Melchisedec, king of Salem, priest of the most high God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings, and blessed him; To whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all; first being by interpretation King of righteousness, and after that also King of Salem, which is, King of peace;
3 Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually.”
Melchizedek was without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days nor end of life. He was made like unto the Son of God. Therefore he could not be Shem. But if you look closely at Melchizedek, you will see that God’s name is in him three times.
King of Assyria and King of Syria different:
In the beginning part of this topic, we listed various scriptures where Israel and Syria were mentioned as part of God’s plan, starting with “Abraham, the Syrian”.
It wasn’t that Syria the nation was “chosen”; but “Israel” was called out of “Syria”. Israel will also be called out of the nations in which they were scattered.
Syria isn’t innocent either. They had their battles with Israel too. And as Israel and any other nation mentioned in the Bible, they were tempted toward idolatry. However when they fought David and lost, they came to revere David.
In 2 Kings 16:5, God sends the king of Syria and the king of Israel against The king of Judah because of his wicked conspiring to “change” the order of the house of God. Ahaz, if you remember, was the one who moved the brazen sea from off of the oxen and set it directly on the stone pavement in the house of God; and he "cut off the borders of the bases" and removed the laver off of them in 2 Kings 16:17.
What caught my eye about this story, which continues a few chapters, is that Ahaz seeks the help of the king of Assyria to hold off Rezin (Remember Resen, that “great city” founded by Asshur!), the king of Syria and Pekah, son of Remaliah, the king of Israel.
“In the seventeenth year of Pekah the son of Remaliah Ahaz the son of Jotham king of Judah began to reign. Twenty years old was Ahaz when he began to reign, and reigned sixteen years in Jerusalem, and did not that which was right in the sight of the Lord his God, like David his father.
But he walked in the way of the kings of Israel, yea, and made his son to pass through the fire, according to the abominations of the heathen, whom the Lord cast out from before the children of Israel. And he sacrificed and burnt incense in the high places, and on the hills, and under every green tree.
5 Then Rezin king of Syria and Pekah son of Remaliah king of Israel came up to Jerusalem to war: and they besieged Ahaz, but could not overcome him. At that time Rezin king of Syria recovered Elath to Syria, and drave the Jews from Elath: and the Syrians came to Elath, and dwelt there unto this day.
7 So Ahaz sent messengers to Tiglathpileser king of Assyria, saying, I am thy servant and thy son: come up, and save me out of the hand of the king of Syria, and out of the hand of the king of Israel, which rise up against me."
Why are “Syria” and “Assyria” differentiated here? Note that “Syria” and “Israel” were both struggling against Ahaz. Also note that the king of “Syria” drove the Jews out of “Elath” and recovered “Elath” to “Syria”.
“They drove the Jews out of Elath and “Recovered Elath to Syria”. What did that mean?
What is Elath? Allegedly, it is a city in Ancient Syria also called “Elait”. It is assumed to be in the approximate location as “Ezion-Geber”. Abarim Publications asserts this:
Perhaps in the Modern Hebrew which is the Babylonian Aramaic, that is what Elath means. However if we dig, some other things come to light.
We all should be familiar with “alla” (quoted in the article above) as the “Allah” that Islam worships as God. Since Arabic is also a Semitic language, how can “alla” translate to “terebinth” from Arabic to Hebrew? All it is missing is the silent “h” (or /h/) at the end. So I began digging:
I broke up the word: Elath = E + lath. Under E, what first turned up?
That was in itself interesting (when was “Elohim” inserted into the text as a “name” for God?).
Eloh and Elohim is an augmentation of “El”. So I looked up “El” again:
That wasn’t very helpful, was it? E + “lath” turned up this:
Both “beam” and “plank” (worked on a lathe) have been used biblically to describe the judging of others “first remove the plank out of your eye before you try to remove the beam out of your brother’s eye”.
El and Al for “Eloah” and “Allah” respectively turned up these searches:
So I went to scripture, because Jesus called our Father by two different names. In Mark 14:36 as Jesus prayed in the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus called “Abba, Father”. In the book of Mathew, Jesus cried on the cross, “Eli, Eli” and it is written as such:
“And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? That is to say. My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?”
Jesus called “Eli” for “God”.
Abraham = high father? (Abra does not equal Eli).
Not being satisfied with that (“El” is in “Eli”), and crediting Jesus’s use of the word “Eli” for “My God, my God”, I separated the word “Elath” a bit differently:
Elath = El + ath.
For the word “El”, see above. Back to the scriptures for Eli, the teacher of Samuel: Samuel is the one that showed Saul “The Word of God” (1 Samuel 9:27) and prophesied that Saul would “prophecy” with the singers, and “turn into another man” (1 Samuel 10:6). But before Samuel becomes high priest, there is an exchange that takes place between Eli and his pupil, Samuel:
And the child Samuel ministered unto the Lord before Eli. And the word of the Lord was precious in those days; there was no open vision. And it came to pass at that time, when Eli was laid down in his place, and his eyes began to wax dim, that he could not see;
And ere the lamp of God went out in the temple of the Lord, where the ark of God was, and Samuel was laid down to sleep; That the Lord called Samuel: and he answered, Here am I."
I searched “Eli” also to see if the addition of “i” changed the meaning at all, or added to it. Abarim had more detail then Etymonline:
Yod/Yodh – the “jot or tittle” Jesus mentioned in Matthew 5:18. The “antithesis of the law” (a house made with hands) and placed in God’s name by man (according to the letter) and evoking squatter’s rights in the chromosome of men (replacing the “Y” with the “ ‘ “).
El (Eli) according to scripture and an uncommitted Abarim Publications is “My God or God of Me”, so then “El” is God.
El + ath = “Elath”. I did find something under “ath”. Since there were a lot of uses for the suffix “ath”, I thought I would run into problems, but I did not. The answer was in the first result turned up:
“Athan-atos” means “immortal” in the Greek = a (not) + thanatos (death).
El+ath = God + Immortal”.
To test this, the word “athan” appears as “thanos” in the suggestion to see “thanatology”:
“Thanatology” is the “study of death”: “thanos” = death + ology
Atheist comes from this origin also (A (not, without) + Theist (god) = Without a god).
So that you understand what it was that Rezin of Syria “recovered”, let’s look at that verse again:
“5 Then Rezin king of Syria and Pekah son of Remaliah king of Israel came up to Jerusalem to war: and they besieged Ahaz, but could not overcome him. At that time Rezin king of Syria recovered Elath to Syria, and drave the Jews from Elath: and the Syrians came to Elath, and dwelt there unto this day.
7 So Ahaz sent messengers to Tiglathpileser king of Assyria, saying, I am thy servant and thy son: come up, and save me out of the hand of the king of Syria, and out of the hand of the king of Israel, which rise up against me."
Now you also know what the difference is between “Syria” and “A-ssyria” . . . a = “without/ not”.
Syria by the way comes from the Akkadian “sar” for “prince”. A-ssyria then would mean, “not” or “without” the “prince”.
It says above in that verse that Rezin drove the Jews from “Elath” and recovered Elath to Syria. It then says the “Syrians came to Elath, and dwelt there unto this day”.
This verse is also the very first in which the word “Jew” first appears in scripture. It is before the incident where Eliakim asks Rabshakeh to speak to him in the Syrian language instead of the language of the Jews.
The very first appearance of the word “Jew” in the scriptures,; and lo and behold, the Jews are at war with Israel – the REAL Israel.
It’s Not A Civil War
A year ago we published “Syria’s Secret”. On that article was posted evidence that America and Israel had been involved in trying to overthrow the government of Syria back in 1957.
Article "Balkanize Syria"?
We also showed evidence that the “civil war” is not really about “terrorists” at all, but about a few missing pages from a 1,000 year old Bible that just happened to be protected by a small sect of Syrian Christians in Aleppo, Syria.
That article was published back in 2008, then edited in 2013. The "Civil War" was constructed in 2011. Just as Rezin, king of Syria came to the king of Israel’s aide against the “Jews” in 2 Kings 16, so the government of Syria was protecting them in Aleppo (they recovered Elath to Syria).
The “Civil War” in Syria began on March 15, 2011. The narrative goes that warring factions of Sunni-vs-Kurdish tribes turned into a protest against Syria’s government and it’s president Bashar al-Assad. “ISIL/ISIS” arose out of nowhere with western vehicles, munitions and weaponry. Those with eyes to see know that there is another entity behind the protests that turned to war. It is the same pattern that played out in Libya, Iraq, Egypt, Lebannon, Bahrain, Cameroon, Uganda, South Africa, Afghanistan and is now currently in play in Somalia, Ethiopia and Iran amongst other nations not mentioned in the mainstream news.
In 2011, this article appeared in the “People’s Voice”:
This was published on November 29, 2011, eight months after the conflict started. This paragraph contained an interesting number:
The “Sixth Fleet” . . . Maybe a coincidence (the number 6, the six pointed star of “Israel”/Moloch, the sixth planet and the Mormon’s fixation on it). In a subsequent paragraph, the article acknowledges a warning to U.S. workers in Syria, alerting to the coming “something brewing”:
Finally this paragraph on the same article begs the question: Where are these “insurgents” and “rebels” getting such advanced weaponry and vehicles?
The answer to that now five year old question, and verification of the accusations in that article are probably best answered by our former Secretary of State:
There are several speeches linked together spanning from 2011 through just last year. Take note of the backdrop at approximately 2:18 minutes. She gave this particular speech at the “Saban Forum”.
The Saban Forum is a “think tank” inside another “think tank” at the “Brookings Institute”. It is described as, “. . . an annual dialogue between American and Israeli leaders across the political and social spectrum, organized by the Center For Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution” – Brookings.edu
Although the name of the forum suggests an Arab itinerary at the “Center for Middle East Policy” at the Brookings Institute, it is nothing of the sort.
Fast-forward to 2016, and everything that the author of “The People’s Voice” suspected is being played out. One article dated September 6, 2016 (9/6/16) not only accurately identifies the strategy behind invading Syria to isolate Iran; it also identifies Israel as taking part in “terror bombings”.
Two days later, the same source reports on “Obama talks Peace in Syria While Waging War.”
Where have we seen this before?
“They have healed also the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly; saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.”
“For they have healed the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.”
“And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.”
“He shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province; and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his father’s fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey, and the spoil, and riches: yea, and he shall forecast his devices against the strongholds, even for a time.”
Syria holds the key to the original human language. Syria “possibly” comes from the word “sar” meaning “prince" (Czar). And there is no question that the Jews want something out of Syria: A thousand year old remnant of written scriptures?
Salah – Selah – Shiloh
“The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.”
Shiloh means – “he whose it is”.
"Thus saith the Lord God; Remove the diadem, and take off the crown: this shall not be the same: exalt him that is low, and abase him that is high. I will overturn, overturn, overturn, it: and it shall be no more, until he come whose right it is; and I will give it him."