The Image Which Fell Down
"And they called Barnabas, Jupiter; and Paul, Mercurius, because he was the chief speaker. Then the priest of Jupiter, which was before their city, brought oxen and garlands unto the gates, and would have done sacrifice with the people."
"And when the townclerk had appeased the people, he said, Ye men of Ephesus, what man is there that knoweth not how that the city of the Ephesians is a worshipper of the great goddess Diana, and of the image which fell down from Jupiter?"
“And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.”
The more things “change”, the more they stay the same. I’m not sure who coined that phrase, but I remember hearing it in my youth.
Even the term “coined the word” eludes to words engraved in stone or metals. And then a funny thing happened to me the other day. My heart is again filled with hope after tasking through another struggle only to find my heart where it has always been. That is where the Lord is, twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. That is where my thoughts are.
Back in October of this year, 2016 the article “One Hundred and Twenty Days” was published. About two thirds of the way down on that page we posted this picture:
The image shows two host’s of “The View” pushing a lever to light the Empire State Building in the “colors” of the show, to celebrate their 20th year on the air. The lever has some oddly pagan and Masonic symbols on it, as does the wall behind it.
Someone else commented about this in a film on Youtube:
2:24 Emp St Bldg
The video has some other interesting points to make, such as the two opposing heads of the same phoenix/eagle vying for the same seat of President of the U.S. (Masonic symbol, double headed/good-cop, bad-cop /phoenix/eagle) and this will soon make itself painfully obvious. See Daniel 11:20-27 and especially verse 27.
Another disappointing realization was the information on Trump’s pastor, “Norman Vincent Peale” whom practically the world knows. Someone I admired from my childhood was also enamored with this man, and he’s a 33 degree Mason. I never knew it. It wasn’t important to me back then. His books were highly recommended by Amway royalty.
Donald Trump had a close relationship with this man, as did many Amway diamond distributors. Peale presided over the marriages of Trump and Ivana, and also Trump’s sister, U.S. Circuit Court Sr. Judge Maryanne. The quote from the 1983 Phil Donahue show is quite disturbing and disappointing.
Like most people, I am tired of seeing ugly. I don’t want to be the bearer of bad news. People are waiting for the good news, they thirst for peace and rest, but there is none in the lie. No matter how pretty they paint the picture; no matter how savory the lure, there is no rest in the lie. It is only a wheel reupholstered as it turns in time. Nothing new to see: A Harlequin Romance that changes nothing but the names of the same ingénue and hero, plot and outcome.
The devil, dragon, Satan, serpent, Lucifer has had many names throughout scripture and throughout the cultures of the world; such as “Lucy”, Shiva, Libertas/Lady Liberty, Minerva, Marianne, Columbia, Diana, Artemis, etc. Michael Jackson’s songs also gave the devil many names also: Billie Jean, Susie, Sephra, Diana, Dom Steddon, heartbreaker amongst others.
The reason Diana caught my attention was because of a film one of my siblings sent to me about a star that fell from Jupiter. We will get to that in a minute, but as I searched the scripture about this star that “fell” as lightning from the sky, I was reminded about the Roman “Diana” in the scriptures, and I revisited Michael Jackson’s song “Dirty Diana”:
“I’ll do what you want,
If you make me your Star”
At 1:54 - "Make me your star" directly attaches “Diana” to the “star” that fell, via she who fell from “Jupiter” in the Roman mysteries recognized in scripture.
3:00 the storyline in the lyrics are not about a "groupie" (as is also misinterpreted with "Billie Jean"), but that of the devil fighting over a "soul" in the "house" against the Lord, or in this case, the "daughter of Zion/mother of Israel” – that is, Israel who repeatedly has fallen for the lie. Much of his songs, like “the girl is mine” reminds me of Jude 1:9 and most of Isaiah and Jeremiah.
In Billie Jean, Michael sings that he never committed adultery against God. The "forty days and forty nights, the law was on her side" from Ezekiel 4 is one clue, as well as "who can stand" from Daniel 12:1 and "her schemes and her plans" in Jeremiah 11:9.
In Dirty Diana, the devil's name is of course, "Diana". Diana is also mentioned in scripture five times as a goddess that the Romans worshipped (Greeks called her Artemis). Paul and a few apostles cause a stir in Ephesus by upsetting the worshippers of Diana and the “craftsmen” who are made rich by the demand of their craft to fashion their images. They reason:
"So that not only this our craft is in danger to be set at nought; but also that the temple of the great goddess Diana should be despised, and her magnificence should be destroyed, whom all Asia and the world worshippeth."
All Asia and the world “worshippeth”. Take a look around. Her image sits on Ellis Island, in France, in China, in Batavia. Are these reflecting of the Lord and His commandments? Of course not. Do you see that nothing has changed? Do you see why the lyrics to Michael’s song “BAD” includes “and the whole world has to answer right now just to tell you once again . . . who’s bad”?
He/she is throughout the pantheon of pop culture and rock music metaphors and the battle between truth and illusion, right and wrong, good and evil takes place in the “musick”, as well as the dramas, the media/press and literature. Other arts also, have not escaped the battlefield.
Jesus saw Satan fall as lightning from the sky in Luke 10:18.
"And when the townclerk had appeased the people, he said, Ye men of Ephesus, what man is there that knoweth not how that the city of the Ephesians is a worshipper of the great goddess Diana, and of the image which fell down from Jupiter?"
They worshiped an “image” that “fell down from Jupiter”. That, my friends, is Lucifer.
“How thou art fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations.”
Why and how this came under my radar should not have surprised me, but it did.
A Christian Astrologer?
A sibling of mine sent me a film about the watching of the heavens and the star of Bethlehem. I began watching it in pieces because it is over an hour long. When he mentioned Jupiter, I wanted to close my ears, but I thought, “let’s see where this is going”.
He used astronomy software to allegedly go back into time, to the “date” of the birth of Christ. He mentions several reasons why the popular time of the threat of Herod to the baby Jesus was wrong. He compares scripture to this “timing” of the “star” appearing in the sky, which is followed by the wise men; then shows on this “software” how Jupiter, Virgo and the “moon” “dance” into the constellation of “Leo”.
You can watch the video in its entirety here. If they change the link or pull it down, you can search it with the title “The Star of Bethlehem Scientifically Proven”.
The man who put this together is named Frederick A. Larson. He is a lawyer, a professor and apparently now, a filmmaker. He looks like an actor I’ve seen before, but I can’t place him.
He admits that he is not an astronomer. He is likeable and I wanted to believe him. I don’t disagree with the possibility that a planet conjunction within a constellation occurred. But I do disagree with his interpretation of the scripture and since this is what he is basing his calculations on, his story begins to develop problems.
The introduction is lengthy but prepares you for how he came to do the research on the “star”.
At 43:00 minutes he brings into discussion the prophecy of Revelation 12 - but at this point he is interpreting it not as prophecy, but as history.
The translation he is reading from is not the King James. It is not from any of the main English versions quoting "a great and wondrous sign appeared in heaven". But this isn't as significant as what he interprets out of it.
He says about the dragon with the seven heads and the ten horns and seven crowns upon his heads: "If you understand this, please email me." From there he recites Revelation 12:3, which read on the screen: "Then another sign appeared in heaven: an enormous red dragon with seven heads and ten horns and seven crowns on his heads".
On the next screen he recites from this text Revelation 12:4 concerning the dragon standing "in front" of the woman to devour her child as soon as it was born. On the next screen he reads Revelation 12:5 which in his translation reads:
"She gave birth to a son, a male child, who will rule all the nations with an iron sceptre."
In King James, which is not re-written but translated from the Greek and Hebrew by Tyndale:
And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up to God and to his throne".
Do you see the difference in the wording here? The two translations differ in the use of the words and tense of this event.
King James Version New International Version
brought forth "gave birth"
man child son, male child
who was to rule who will rule
with a rod of iron with an iron scepter
This slight change in the tense of the verb from “was to rule” to “will rule” not only changes the order of the prophecy as God gave it, but it also disproves his theory . . . how can this be the baby Jesus in Revelation 12 if the child “will rule”? Especially since it is Jesus giving the Revelation to John in the first place.
Rewriting the scripture to say “will rule” also places the first claimant to Messiah as “the one” when both Paul and Jesus tell us that the man of sin appears first, before he is “destroyed with the brightness of his coming”. This is as tricky as the “pre-Tribulation rapture” doctrine, which also deceives people into the notion that Jesus appears first to rule “on earth” for a thousand years which is nowhere in the Bible at all.
On the usage of iron in the scriptures:
"Therefore it shall be when ye be gone over Jordan, that ye shall set up these stones, which I command you this day, in mount Ebal, and thou shalt plaister them with plaister. And there shalt thou build an altar unto the Lord thy God, an altar of stones: thou shalt not lift up any iron tool upon them. Thou shalt build the altar of the Lord thy God of whole stones: and thou shalt offer burnt offerings thereon unto the Lord thy God:"
The stones the Lord told Joshua to build the altar with had to be “whole stones” where no “iron tool” should be lifted upon them. This is reiterated in the book of Joshua.
“As Moses the servant of the Lord commanded the children of Israel, as it is written in the book of the law of Moses, an altar of whole stones, over which no man hath lift up any iron: and they offered thereon burnt offerings unto the Lord, and sacrificed peace offerings."
This should now give you an idea of just what the “altar” is, and of what it is fashioned “after the things that are in heaven”. The “stones” and “timbers” of the “house”: The alter for the offering is within us. Zechariah also is given a prophecy concerning Joshua’s task:
"Hear now, O Joshua the high priest, thou, and thy fellows that sit before thee: for they are men wondered at: for, behold, I will bring forth my servant the Branch. For behold the stone that I have laid before Joshua; upon one stone shall be seven eyes: behold, I will engrave the graving thereof, saith the Lord of hosts, and I will remove the iniquity of that land in one day."
That which the Lord engraves himself is also foretold in Exodus 31:18 and Deuteronomy 9:10, on the tables of testimony, of stone.
Those cunning to work in gold, silver, brass and iron to “grave” were called by David who did not build the house, but which Solomon did: Craftsmen and Masons.
“Send me now therefore a man cunning to work in gold, and in silver, and in brass, and in iron, and in purple, and crimson, and blue, and that can skill to grave with the cunning men that are with me in Judah and in Jerusalem, whom David my father did provide."
In Acts, Paul differentiated between that which was forged by men and that which was graved by God: A tabernacle not made with hands (Hand = Yod/Jot/Tittle).
“Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think of the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man’s device.”
And the vision Nebuchadnezzar had which Daniel explained about iron and clay; mingling of the seed :
“And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay."
The iron also represents a positive if given by God, as Jesus prophesied to John about “he who overcomes” in Revelation 2:26-28.
How did the “rod” become the “scepter” in Larson’s translation and does it matter?
The use of the word "scepter" in the translation this man is using is significant in that he refers back to Genesis 49 - the blessings given the twelve sons of Israel/Jacob, but he only quotes Judah's prophecy in verses nine and ten.
"Judah is a lion's whelp: from the prey, my son, thou art gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up? The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be."
But the verse that Larson quotes reads differently: Where "Shiloh" appears in King James, the NIV translates this to "he to whom it belongs". This reflects the meaning of the name "Shiloh" and in the King James this is also repeated again in scripture in Ezekiel 21:26-27.
Shiloh appears in the Bible with the other name of a prophet he quotes from and that is the prophet Micah. The "image of Micah" is set up in the "house of God, which is in Shiloh", in Judges 18:31. How can this be? Because the “evil is revealed” in “Shiloh” and “Shiloh” is where the stick of Judah with his brothers, and the stick of Joseph in the hands of Ephraim are made one in the Lord’s hand.
But Judah has the scepter until Shiloh comes. Larson refers to the Israelites as Jews. But the Bible refers to them separately, as we learned in 2 Kings 16 when the Jews are at war with Israel. The “conspiracy among the men of Judah” from Jeremiah 11:9 stems from the prophecy in Genesis 49 concerning that scepter and Judah’s hatred of Joseph – jealousy. Larson’s interpretation seeks to deliberately disregard the prophecy concerning Joseph and his dreams. Remember Joseph's visions in Genesis 37? Remember this was the reason his brothers hated him and sold him into slavery, in Egypt.
Read down in Genesis 49 to find out to "who" the gathering of the people shall be:
"Joseph is a fruitful bough, even a fruitful bough by a well; whose branches run over the wall: The archers have sorely grieved him, and shot at him, and hated him: But his bow abode in strength, and the arms of his hands were made strong by the hands of the mighty God of Jacob; (from thence is the shepherd, the stone of Israel:)
Even by the God of thy father, who shall help thee; and by the Almighty, who shall bless thee with blessings of heaven above, blessings of the deep that lieth under, blessings of the breasts, and of the womb: The blessings of thy father have prevailed above the blessings of my progenitors unto the utmost bound of the everlasting hills: they shall be on the head of Joseph, and on the crown of the head of him that was separate from his brethren."
This scripture identifies God as the origin of the “stone of Israel”, not men, not Jews. The Jews were building “the house” in Haggai 2. The “Name” has always been but they have profaned that “in the midst of them”. Mary, Jesus’ mother, provides the seed of the woman so that the “Word” could become “flesh” and dwell among us.
Larson says at 44:41 minutes that the "man child" in Revelation 12 is Jesus, the "woman" is Mary, and that the "dragon" (metaphorically) is Herod, and "metaphorically" this could be true except for this: This is Revelation; prophecy of the end times. It is Jesus who gives it to John. Who follows the "man child" into the kingdom of heaven? The dragon, Revelation 12:5-7.
What happens when "Michael" and his angels throw the dragon and his angels out of heaven? That's right . . . the dragon and his angels "prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven". The dragon, the old serpent, the Devil, is cast out and his angels with him. And in verse 12 those that dwell in the heavens are told to rejoice, but for those in the earth and the sea "woe to the inhabiters" because the devil has come down with great wrath, "because he knoweth that he hath but a short time." This is the end. This is it.
From this point the dragon persecutes the woman who "brought forth" the man child and makes war with her seed, which is the “remnant” she brings forth in her travail. The man child she brings forth “before her pain” which Isaiah was told by the Lord.
The answer to scripture is in scripture. Every “contradiction” taught by false prophets can be refuted using the scripture they are misinterpreting. This is why the whole Bible must be taken into account. The angel of the Lord gives Daniel the “timeline” for a reason. Everything on that timeline is the things that have, were, and will occur in the prophecy of that book.
She who "brings forth" is described as the daughter of Zion in Jeremiah 4:31, Isaiah 4:4, Isaiah 66:7-8, and also in the book of Micah as well as Ezekiel and the other prophets of the book. She too suffers a “fight of afflictions” after she is “illuminated”. She too is stalked by those wanting to use what is given for their own purposes. They fail, which is why the dragon is so angry.
Because Larson promotes this idea of “Jupiter” being the “star of Bethlehem”, and Jupiter appears in the scriptures as a god of the Asians/Romans/Greeks in their time, I sought to test this theory. On the interpretation of Revelation 12 by the other scriptures in the Bible, it fails. So where was he going with this?
The “star of Bethlehem” has more than an astronomical meaning.
Bethlehem means “house for the name of God”: Beit-el-shem. Solomon was building one but he sinned by deviating from the pattern to empower himself. Haggai 2 reveals the purpose of this “house” they build with “hands unclean”.
The “star” is that which God gives to he who overcomes, which is the “morning star”, which is the “light” which is the “life of men” in John 1:4. But only he who is chosen to “bear his name”, as the angel in Exodus 23:20-21; as Paul in Acts 9:15-16, and Revelation 19:12-13. “His Name is called the Word of God”. It is the one word that fulfills all the law. This is what this star represents and you know where it sits protected. All men have been separated from this light even though it is within them: That is until the obedience of Jesus on the cross and the renting of the “vail”.
Sending “Jupiter” as a sign to guide wise men to the “birth of Jesus” didn’t seem right: especially since “Diana/Artemis” was the “image” that “fell” from Jupiter mentioned in the scriptures.
Jupiter in Roman mythology, is the son of Saturn. So I did a search on both of these and the first thing that came up was this:
The Jupiter Connection
It’s not impossible that God would use a celestial planet as a sign. It is evident in scripture that He has. Man has taken these signs and turned them into religions, and it is the religions that have been used as a law in various cultures, to divide men from men, and men from God.
There is a problem with Larson’s timing of Herod’s death, the appearance of the “star” and the “birth”. They could not have all occurred during the period of 1 A.D. Matthew 2:12-20 explains this time period stretching over a period of two years. Therefore Herod could not have died in 1 A.D. The conjunction he is talking about with Jupiter, Virgo and Leo he says occurred in 3 A.D.
Larson is also placing this “star/Jupiter” event between the conception and the visit of the wise men. The knowledge coming to Herod is separate. He brings up the planetarium Christmas shows showing this event which is confusing, because we know from Luke chapter 1:26-56 that Jesus was conceived in the sixth month, while Mary’s cousin Elisabeth was six months with child. Elisabeth’s child jumped within her when Mary came to visit so by this we know that Mary was already pregnant.
Mary left after the birth of John, which if carried to term would have been three months later, in the Hebrew ninth month (our November or November/December), and Mary would have had to carry another six months , taking her into the third to fourth Hebrew month of the following year which would be our May/June. We know she was “great with child” when they traveled from Nazareth to Bethlehem, where Jesus was born.
If Larson places this “star” event beginning at conception, the first part of this would work. But according to scripture, the baby Jesus was already in a house and a toddler when the wise men found him some time after his birth – Matthew 2:7-11. And according to verse nine, the star was still present. Do planetary conjunctions take weeks or years to occur? They are usually over within a week, at least viewed with the naked eye.
Assuming that Herod waited two years to hear from the wise men; or even if their visit occurred much sooner after Jesus’ birth, Herod still ordered the killing of all male children two years and younger based on the time the star appeared. How then can this be a planet moving to join to and through Virgo and Leo?
The appearance of “Venus” with Jupiter forming the star at 48:44 in the video makes it even more interesting. When did this occur? According to Larson this “Venus” event (mother planet) takes place in November to December as he is pointing to the projections of his astronomy software. Matthew 2 verse 16 says:
“Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the wise men, was exceeding wroth, and sent forth, and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently inquired of the wise men.”
So there you have it: The “two year” period was not the period of the star, but that from the time of Herod’s encounter and inquiry of the wise men, and the time he awaited their return.
Now, on about 51:18 minute mark on the video here (so you don’t have to scroll back up), he shows you allegedly on the astronomy software that the planet “Jupiter” made it’s “stop/retrograde movement” on December 25. I took a screen shot of what he showed:
He is careful to say that he is not claiming that Jesus was born on December 25th. But neither does he mention Luke chapter 1 and it’s truth of the time of year. If this event occurred in or around December, then this negates the “star” being Jupiter or a combo of Jupiter/Venus because Jesus was not born in December and that we have in scripture, according to the months of the Hebrew Calendar.
So then why the emphasis on “Jupiter” and the 25th of December? Why is this learned man teaching a lie that is right there in Luke chapter one on Jesus’ birth time of the year?
We start delving into this issue and some interesting things materialize: one of those being, this man is teaching a lie. Whether this is deliberate or not is not for me to judge. Is there an ulterior motive for this “star” to “scientifically” identify December 25 as the birth of Jesus or associate Bethlehem with Jupiter, and if so, why? Why Jupiter?
Since the “fall of the image from Jupiter” of Diana is mentioned in the book of Acts, I continued there. Rome worshipped Diana, the Greek equivalent of Artemis according to history; who is the daughter of Jupiter, equivalent of the Greek “Zeus”.
Jupiter in Roman mythology, is the son of “Saturn”. As I read through the summary of Jupiter’s information, I found something else interesting: Jupiter was considered “king of the gods”, god of thunder, etc; but then there was this:
“Capitoline Hill” sounds a lot like “Capitol Hill”. Capitol Hill in the United States is in Washington D.C. Capitol Hill is the name of the “hill” on which the Capitol Building sits, where the “kings” and “merchants of the earth” vote to buy and sell the assets and the “slaves and souls of men” (Revelation 18:10-13).
Anyone want to guess who sits atop the dome on the Capitol Building?
The French "Marianne"
(What does the "S" stand for?)
And/or Columbia - goddess of Freedom
That’s right, “Minerva”: goddess of “freedom”, the “Liberator”/Lucifer, Columbia – Source, Architect of The Capitol.gov
Another search that came up under “Jupiter Saturn” was a speech given by a Dr. R.C. Durham. It centered round the “Jupiter Talisman” as related to the “Seal of Solomon”.
What I didn’t know was that the “Jupiter Talisman” was most famous because of where and how it was discovered, which was through none other than Joseph Smith, the founder of The Mormon LDS Church.
The document this information appears on is the “Is There No Help For The Widow’s Son?” Speech given by Dr. Reed, C. Durham. It is discussed on the blog of a former Mormon:
On the talisman library on “Wolf.mind.net”, the Jupiter talisman and the Saturn Talisman are identified as implements used by the “Magi”. Remember that the King James Version of the Bible translates the Greek into “wise men”, not “Magi”. The word “Magi” does not appear at all in the King James Version.
On that “Wolf” link, there appears an image of the Saturn Talisman, which includes in the middle of the “star” a “Vav” on one side, and an “Ox” on the other side with a crescent moon above it’s head.
Talisman of Saturn
On both that link, the “Lifeafter” link and the one below, the Jupiter Talisman, as well as the Saturn and others, are associated with Masonry and Cabbalism.
A former Mormon under “Wonderwitch.blogspot” posts excerpts of the Reed Durham speech with commentary.
It was called “The Masonic Jewel”. I also highlighted the measurements because the numbers are also in the measurement of the “Minerva” on top of the Capitol Building in Washington D.C. (District of Columbia). The Statue at the top of the dome on the building measures 19 feet and 6 inches tall. The “talisman” is 1-9/16 inches in diameter. Further down same blogspot:
This mentions the Magus. We have talked about the “Magus” before, most recently on February 2015’s article “Call Signs”. On that article, it talks about the purpose of the Cabala. It is a key by which they mark every change, divide and transfer they’ve made of names, words and letters in the scriptures.
This is the “authority” by which most ministers, preachers, pastors and reverends are TAUGHT to interpret the scriptures. It’s not “pernicious superstition” – the Masoretes knew exactly what they did and for what purpose:
“But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither ye suffer them that are entering to go in.”
“Woe unto you, Lawyers! For ye have taken away the key of knowledge: Ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.”
This is why they don’t want the missing pages of the Aleppo Codex found. It’s NOT in the same language of the alleged “copy” they’ve made sitting in their museum. And it is NOT in the language re-written by the Masoretes. If it were, Israel, the “state” would not have been after them and Aleppo, Syria would have not been the subject of a manufactured “war”.
Changing the Truth of God
Into a Lie
From this source, I copied a couple of excerpts from Durham’s 1974 speech, which by all descriptions caused quite a stir. In this paragraph, Durham describes the language on Joseph Smith’s Jupiter Talisman, and what it says/symbolizes. On the front he describes a word that stands for “Abba” for “Father. On the back side he says of it:
"Accurately grammatical"? Doesn't he have that backward? The next paragraph down, Durham describes where he found the meanings of the symbols/letters on the talisman:
This verifies the comments on the “Lifeafter” and the “Wonderwitch” blogspot. He compares in the paragraph below, the numbers corresponding with the Hebrew letters, and how the “numbers” were changed to the Hebrew letters on the one which Smith owned.
The “Hebrew names of deities” caught my attention. Do Hebrews have names of more than one deity? Is there more than one God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob? Yet this was even more revealing: “the exactly same break in the orbit of Jupiter planet” . . . What break in the orbit of Jupiter? The same one that Larson said happened using his astronomy software on the video?
This is where Larson’s “theories” were coming from! A Mormon script taken from a Masonic “script”; or more anciently, an Egyptian one.
Oh really? According to the Bible, “Jupiter” is a god that the Ephesians worship, which Paul came to them to correct in Acts 14:12-13 and Acts 19:35. Sadoc/Zadoc has only one mention in the Bible, and that is in the book of Matthew, chapter 1, as the son of Azor, who is the grandson of Eliakim, who is the grandson of Zerubbabel/Zorobabel. The spelling of “Zadok” with a “k” produces the priest of the temple during Solomon’s days, which is the same “Zadoc” in the Matthew genealogy.
To the “Egyptians, Jupiter was known as Ammon”, Durham said – which just happens to be the name of the god that the Mormons worship – Adam-ondi-Ahman. This is the name which was given to “Spring Hill”, Missouri. Remember what we learned of the translation (according to the Jews) of “Tel Aviv”? That’s right, that it means “spring hill” or “hill of spring” (Remember “Aultneuland” by Theodore Hertzl on “The River Chebar”).
“Adam-ondi-Ahman” is said to mean “Adam in the presence of God”, therefore “Ahman” is their “god”. – Source, ldschurchtemples.com
This is a regurgitation of the age-old deception spoken of in Revelation 12:9. The “bondage of Egypt”, (Ezekiel 29:3). This is “Dangerous”.
Jove/Jovial/Jupiter concerns with the fortunes of life. Under its influence are legislators, bankers and lawyers (Pharisees, moneychangers and scribes) – all who Jesus admonished during his ministry on earth. “If ye were of the world, the world would love its own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you” - John 15:19.
The only other portion of this speech that deserved attention was the information regarding the letter on the stone covering the cave where both the Talisman/secrets were kept, and the later story of Smith’s golden plates. Durham’s speech states that Joseph Smith was named Enoch, even by God, and he was age 25 (as was allegedly Enoch) when he brought forth his sacred record. His sacred record was buried in the hill by a man who had the initial “M”.
The “treasure/secrets” buried in the “hill/mountain” under a stone reminds me of the song “One Tin Soldier”. The “tin” is also mentioned in this story, of which this talisman was cast.
The character of Jupiter/table of Jupiter or “Kamea” is associated with the Theban alphabet. The word “Theban” is what those who were from Thebes, Egypt were called.
Theban and Thuban are related, as “Thuban” is the name of a “star” depicted on the star chart in the floor of the visitor center at the Hoover Dam which – was also designed and built by a Mormon organized conglomerate of companies named “The Six Companies”.
There is a “Thebes, Greece” and there is also a “Thebes, Egypt”. There is also an Occultic “Thebes Alphabet”.
I, V and V are used in the Greek version of name “Iesous” for “Jesus”. Theban is based on Latin, according to this: and “Latin” is a patient meshing of the names “Lucifer” and “Satan”.
Resembles what I saw in this dream
Also stated in the article is suggestions that the Theban Alphabet is based on either Latin or Latin and Hebrew. Again as in modern “Jewish” Hebrew (Babylonian Aramaic), the “J” is not represented. Funny isn’t it?" Again, the word “Magus” comes up.
What is "the Magus"?
Magus/Magi: The connections are not surprising -
Lytton was connected to Helen Blavatsky and “Theosophy” as much influence of her writings came from him, such as his “The Power of the Coming Race”. Eliphas Levi was an occult author and ceremonial magician.
So then, is Larson correct? If the software is accurate, and if Jupiter did cross with Venus on December 25th (suggesting signs of a virgin birth), it is way off from the time to indicate Jesus' birth. IF the wise men followed this star from Babylon (taking possibly weeks) and if the star “reappeared” and then appeared to “stop” over the house on this “December 25” – it is still discredited as Jupiter, retro-movement or not, this would have taken weeks in travel.
It is also evident that the “star” (which are also scripturally “angels”) was more likely to be connected to Jesus’ birth since the star was about him and not the three “wise men”. There is also to consider the inclement weather in the Middle East during that time of year, which discouraged travel. The Jews had already established a “winter festival” by that time, which was pagan in origin and is mentioned in John 10:21-23. It was not oriented to Christ, they rejected him in favor of their own "temple" of the body. Tammuz is the December 25 focus, not Jesus.
God had the prophets put the timing of Elizabeth’s pregnancy into the scriptures for a reason. It’s not like the Lord didn’t see this coming. Luke 1:26-56 and the Hebrew Calendar will tell you all you need to know about the timing of the birth of Christ. It's not celebrated, but it is in the there. You have to do the math.
The subtle grafting of the pagan into the prophecies of God is occurring. It is also linking together some pretty strong evidence of the origins of Mormonism, Masonry and the “conspiracy among the men of Judah” who refuse to relinquish the “scepter” to “Shiloh”; their brother Joseph.
God made the Jews working on the house in Haggai 2 a promise. He also made them a promise in Ezekiel 21:25-28, and Ezekiel 37:16-19. Iniquity will have an end, and they will bring it upon themselves, through their own works; unless they find that seed within them cultured in faith and conceived in that greater love. They must accept that "stone" which was made "head of the corner" and "engraved by God" over that which they have been trying to forge. They must repent too, to become reunited with God through Christ.
In Ezekiel 21:25-28 ironically, the “Ammonites” (Amon/Ahman) are specifically mentioned. If you are in the church of Egypt or consider yourself a Mormon, the traditions of men are going to be your ruin.
Be vigilant. The Jupiter issue is just one of many they aim to infiltrate into the script.
Christ Brought Him Back
To the Light