Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Sony and Sneddon Connection

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Friday, August 13, 2010

Sony and Sneddon Connection



August 12, 2010 – Sony and Sneddon Connection

We left off yesterday with the paragraph in history between April of 2002 and Martin Bashir’s libelous documentary on Michael Jackson, and the discovery of self-dealing by those who were supposed to represent Michael as part of the trial investigations.

“In April of 2002, Martin Bashir had been inserted into Michael’s life. He filmed and edited an unapproved documentary that was aired in February of 2003, the same month Michael Jackson fired John Branca for conflict of interest and self-dealing. In March of 2003, Tom Sneddon launched an investigation, the second in 10 years, against Michael Jackson. In November of 2003 Michael was arrested. In January 2005 his trial began. During the trial, Interfer, hired by lawyer LeGrande, uncovered improprieties between Branca and Sony’s Tommy Mottola.” Original post

None of this could have been possible had it not been for the cooperation of certain California authorities.

Enter Tom Sneddon.

Photo tom Sneddon


“Thomas Sneddon served as District Attorney of Santa Barbara County from 1983 until 2007. Prior to his election as District Attorney, he had served in the District Attorney's office as Supervisor of Criminal Operations. He began his career in the office in 1969 as a Deputy District Attorney after a brief tenure in the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office. He served in the United States Army from 1967 to 1969. His education background includes a B.A.in history from the University of Notre Dame and a law degree from the University of California, Los Angeles.” Source

Since Tom Sneddon was Sony’s “hit man” in L.A. county over the ten year period between allegations, we will cover him first before we go into the trial of 2005 and the workings behind that. Sneddon spanned both the 1993 and 2003 allegations.

What Sneddon did, such as falsifying evidence, changing dates on phone records . . . all caught and recorded during the trial by Michael’s attorney, Tom Mesereau, are highlighted in this video. Source

During 1993, Tom Sneddon completely raped Michael of his civil rights during the 1993 allegations. The raid conducted on his home, the strip search without even having been arrested, his parents home and the office of the private investigator working with Michael’s lawyer went way above and beyond the scope of the allegations. Sneddon wasn’t just looking for evidence; he was looking for a way to sabotage his defense.

Judge Rodney Melville –

“Melville studied at San Diego State University and Hastings College of the Law, University of California. Melville became an attorney for the firm Melville & Iwasko and became a State Certified Specialist in Family Law. He served as a Deputy District Attorney in the San Bernardino County District Attorney’s Office for two years. In 1987, Melville was appointed to the Municipal Court Bench in 1987. After three years he was promoted to the Superior Court. Melville retired as a judge for the Superior Court in 2007, having served 17 years.” Source

Definition of Malicious Prosecution by Lawbrain (submitted by June):

“An action for damages brought by one against whom a civil suit or criminal proceeding has been unsuccessfully commenced without probable cause and for a purpose other than that of bringing the alleged offender to justice." Source

Why would a D.A. throw someone’s rights out the window, coerce a witness, falsify evidence, change times on phone records and order a strip search on someone not even charged with a crime (as Sneddon did in the 1993 allegations), and illegally raid the offices of the opposing attorney’s hired investigator, unless something else besides justice was driving him? In this clip below, a local talk t.v. show host who sat through testimony during the case, explains what he heard about corporate conspiracy. Source William Wagener

Now who was the corporate entity involved in Michael’s life during his whole adult career?

Sony.

Who was Michael’s attorney responsible for Michael’s contracts with Sony up through 2003?

John Branca, who was fired in 2003.

Why was John Branca fired?

Because Michael found out he was self-dealing and representing Sony, not Michael, in these contracts.

Submitted by Jigoku: "In Aphrodite Jones book is also written that Sony passed financial info on Michael to Sneddon."


John Branca negotiated the original bid for the ATV catalog in 1985. John Branca advised and sealed the deal for EMI (under Bandier), to manage the catalog between 1993 and 1998 (after the Chander molestation accusations and subsequent extortion plot). John Branca is the one that advised Michael to partner with Sony and sell 50% of it to them. John Branca is also the attorney who advised Michael during the renewing of his contract with Sony, when Sony bought out CBS/Epic records . . . Michael’s label, in 1991.

When Michael began having problems with Tommy Mottola over relatively simple things like budgets for music videos and choosing the single releases for his albums . . . something he’s always had artistic control over before, he knew something was up. When he inquired into the turning over of control of his master recordings from Sony to himself and found he still had another seven years before they were his, he had the contract, Sony and Branca investigated. That is when Michael ORIGINALLY LEARNED that Branca was not working in his best interests.

At that point in time, it was a case of a simple conflict of interest. Branca was sitting on the Sony/ATV board at the time and I’m sure he tried to explain things to Michael, cajole him, tell him to calm down. But Michael had not yet fired Branca. Michael instead tried to negotiate an early out from his contract. During this battle of give and take, Michael’s album, “Invincible” was being shelved. Michael set out to promote it himself, spending $25 million of his own money to Sony’s $5 million before they dumped it. It was during THAT time that Bashir infiltrated and got Michael to do the documentary that spawned the 2003 charges that got him arrested and tried for child molestation . . . again. So what do we have?

We have the same corporation behind the same accusations, using different, disadvantaged children from broken families with the same prosecution team in a ten year period.

Wow . . . how do you spell conspiracy? S-O-N-Y

Someone with deep enough pockets to back a bipolar, obsessive dentist to pay off officials in 1993. Someone big enough to convince a previously unwilling mother to take part in a conspiracy with her ex husband against a man who took her family around the world and treated her and her children to exotic vacations, world tours and shopping sprees.

An entity who had a 15 year contract with the subject of their conspiracy, who would be around long enough to attack him again, ten years later when that subject discovered the self dealing and was exposing them and their practices to the public.

An entity who ten years after the first attempt to financially destroy their subject, went after him again in earnest, to teach him another lesson by using yet another child who’s family originally defended the subject in a video tape, but just as the case ten years prior, changed their mind and turned states witness.

An entity who believed the money spent on the people put in place to enact their conspiracy over a ten year period was a good investment. An entity who’s final objective was to gain complete control of a multi-billion dollar music publishing corporation of which Michael Jackson had half ownership.

What was done to this man all because of control and of money. Mob Greed

"This is what we do", Michael told DiLeo, Make children happy



To get a good background on the record and music publishing industry, a good article on The Payola Scandal can be read here. Source

After watching that video, I would like to ask a couple questions of a few people who are out there trying to JUSTIFY the actions of these people RESPONSIBLE for Michael’s MURDER. What have YOU contributed to society? What have you TAKEN?

Do you REALLY believe you will get away with it?

Tom Sneddon is no stranger to retaliatory or selective prosecution. Source Hon. Diane Hall Case

Tom Sneddon – Most Vindictive SOB’s to ever claim he was a public servant

“Tom Sneddon and other city officials, where ways to "get Michael Jackson out of the county" were discussed. Racist remarks were allegedly made on that occasion. According to Sundaram, other alleged vendettas were discussed as well, to the extent where he said it resembled a Mafia planning session.” Source


Tom Sneddon guilty of “Staking”
(charges)

“Sneddon had charged and prosecuted Dunlap on twenty-two counts. After being acquitted on all counts, Dunlap is currently suing Sneddon and others in the DA's office for $10 million for malicious prosecution, and multiple other alleged offenses, including civil rights violations.” Source

Same Article“The extent of the law suits for false arrests, false imprisonments, condoning of excessive force by the police, tampering with evidence, and multiple civil rights violations suggests a culture of corruption among Santa Barbara law-enforcement.” – Try state-wide, starting with the judges.

Why was Sneddon after Dunlap? Here’s why.

John Branca has a fraudulent will that had been ordered by Jackson to be destroyed in 2003 when Michael fired him for self dealing, conflict of interest and embezzlement. Branca and Mottola scammed Michael out of ownership of the masters for his music. This went on for seven years, depriving Michael to the rights of his own songs. He is murdered just a couple of weeks before he is to take ownership of the masters of his songs.

I do not see how Sony and John Branca can successfully convince Michael’s fans that they had nothing to do with Michael’s death and that there was no conspiracy.

I do not see how any Michael fan could continue to purchase from Sony. Michael's children are getting the SAME allowance from the estate regardless of how much money goes into it. Branca, McClain and Weitzman are making the big bucks on the percentages, the TII deals as executive producers, and on the back end representing Sony, which Branca's firm still does.

The Children will see NO CHANGE in their "allowance" until age 30, when they each get an estimated, flat-rate $33 Million dollars. They live off of that until they reach age 40 at which time they will split (after charity 20%) the value of the estate. By that time John Branca, John McClain and Howard Weitzman will be dead and unaccountable for anything that may happen . . . like what happened when Weitzman administered the Cobain Estate.

Those of you wanting to draw AEG, Anchutz and Colony into this remember one thing. They have no control over Michael's estate nor do they have any control over any of the music catalogs that Michael owned. There was no incentive for them to kill Michael. The value of the concerts were a FRACTION of what the value of Michael's catalogs and music were.

This was, is and always has been about those music catalogs . . . the publishing empire. Any responsibility AEG had in Michael's death will be uncovered once you pull down the big curtain . . . Sony.

Tomorrow, we follow the ATV Timeline

Ghosts - 1996

29 comments:

  1. Sorry Bonnie, but I have to disagree about AEG. Who had a deal with sony for TII movie? And the insurance covering Michael Jackson as a person and Michael Jackson LLC? If Michael would have not been able to pass the insurance examination or to perform at the O2, they would have taken everything from him, as the artist and the company, including the Michael Jackson LLC, so, the catalogue managed by Thome.
    In my opinion they made a secret deal with Sony to lead Michael to bankruptcy, drugging him and taking him under strict control, engaging Murray and paying Kay Chase, the chef, to put drugs into his food and beverages. He wouldn't have never passed the insurance examination and he would have had to pay everything selling the catalogue to Sony and Neverland to Colony to have money to pay AEG.
    And what about Julien's auction?
    And Ortega avoiding and dribbling all the questions on Michael's death controlled in what he says by AEG camp?
    And especially all the lies they are telling us of Michael being in good health while he was totally not?

    Sorry, but I still continue to see AEG and Colony as the bad guys.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mistress - It's okay to disagree with me. This is why I don't agree with AEG being THE bad guy.

    AEG did not have a deal with Sony until AFTER Michael died. They got that deal through BRANCA who was the EXECUTIVE PRODUCER with John MCCLAIN. Branca, as the fraudulently appointed executor of Michael's will, had control to sell the rights of "TII" to Sony . . . which he did.

    You said: "And the insurance covering Michael Jackson as a person and Michael Jackson LLC? If Michael would have not been able to pass the insurance examination or to perform at the O2, they would have taken everything from him, as the artist and the company, including the Michael Jackson LLC, so, the catalogue managed by Thome."

    No insurance money has been paid to AEG. None. They've gotten nothing yet. The Insurance money was not enough to recoup their losses. The insurance money is INSIGNIFICANT and not worth killing him. Like I said, to AEG, Michael was worth more alive then dead. To SONY he was worth more dead than alive. AEG needed Michael to do the concerts to make any serious money. Sony needed Michael to fail and die to take control the way that Branca is handing it over now. Tohme . . . never, ever, EVER managed the catalog. Never.

    In order for AEG to make a secret deal with Sony, sony would have had to give up some control or percentage of that catalog . . . they will never do that. Especially not to an outside entity. They killed for control of this and now want to share it with someone else? What sense does that make?

    The deal to lead Michael to bankruptcy began in 1993. AEGLive didn't exist then as a concert promoter. When did Kai Chase become a suspect? Drugging his food? This is the first I've heard of this. He ate with his children, wouldn't they have been drugged too? What about the autopsy? No drugs found in his system other than what Murray gave him. No build up of drugs in his organs other than propofol . . . which Murray gave him.

    Julien's auction has nothing to do with Michael's death, so we will set that aside for now.

    Ortega, I'm not sure who's side he is on. Everyone with TII was under confidentiality agreements so if Ortega is guilty, they are all guilty.

    We have conflicting information as to Michael's health . . . including from some not involved with TII.

    I have to look at documents and money flow and right now the ones making out like bandits are Sony and Branca. AEG sold TII rights to Sony, thanks to Branca. Branca, as producer of TII and as Executor made out on BOTH ENDS of the transaction.

    Sorry . . . but evidence shows it's Sony/Branca as the bad guys.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bonnie, great post, once again. The answers always come from following the money. Sony and Michael, co-owners of a multi-billion dollar company(despite what they want you to believe). Only, Sony is a company and Michael is one man, both owning half. Who has power here. Michael's half is protected by trusts in perpetuity.
    Chandler and Sneddon; always puppets. No way did they have the money(again the money) to bankroll the systematic destruction of Michael's character and life as he knew it.
    Over selling Branca seems to be the in thing to do. Saying what a wonderful guy he is to save the Jackson Estate. That Katherine and kids should be grateful that the duo is there to take care of them. Please people, recognise the slimy, self-serving blogs for what they are. I call no names, so please don't whine.
    Took a little break to just appreciate Michael. Looking forward to the next one, Bonnie.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bonnie, you put out so much great information it's hard to keep up, but I do recall a couple blogs back the subject of Randy Phillips and when he first knew Michael was brought up. He "negotiated" Michael's deal with LA Gear in 1993, so while AEGLive was not around in 1993, Phillips was around Michael. Michael was later sued by LA Gear, he sued back, eventually LA Gear filed bankruptcy. The article also said as soon as Phillips first became connected with AEG by becoming CEO of AEGLive (in 2002?) his priority was promoting top artists for AEGLive, including specifically Michael Jackson. IMO AEG and Phillips, along with Sneddon and Bashir, are opportunists who aided and abetted Sony/Branca.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bonnie I sent you an Email on FB about Kai Chase debts. I only express my suspect in telling Michael was drugged by her, especially because she confirms every version Murray gave,even if crazy, included the timeline that is completely wrong. Furthermore I thought about TINI members and many other followers telling Michael seemed drugged or at least he wasn't ok from May on, do you remember? It was not only propofol here.
    AEG hired Murray to give propofol to Michael, but they told they never hired him and that Michael wanted him, while many people like Karen Faye and many other followers said Michael begged them for another doctor.
    Even Latoya said she found the hiring contract of Murray from AEG when she went at Michael's bedroom.
    I also noticed the fact that in the autopsy the weight and the height are not the ones Michael really had, and that many accident which happened to Michael are not inside the autopsy (the pepsi accident burn scar for ex is not even mentioned)
    I know they haven't been paid yet, because the trial is at the beginning. I think insurance is waiting the end of the trial before deciding to pay them.

    I believe you, because I know you make a lot of researches, but I cannot see them as the good guys; they're telling too many lies.
    They wouldn't tell it unless they have something terrible to hide. My suspect is : what they're hiding?
    A conspiracy with Sony in my opinion....of course it's only my opinion, but it's evident by their behaviour that something here is not so clear with them too.
    Why they continue to lie and lie and lie if they are the good guys?
    And also, if they did nothing wrong, why they are contributing the DA campaign with a lot of money not to be investigated like Arnie Klein did?
    He succeeded, we saw it in the news, and maybe they will succeed in it too, but the question is : why?

    I hope you can clear this to me.
    I Love you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bonnie – thank you for another eye opening ,educational,and completely honest blog.

    You are right Thome never managed the CATALOG. He was working for Michael as his manager not for Sony. How in the world could he have been managed the catalog? That’s in correct. Period.

    I have heard Larry King interviewing Tom Messaurau right after the trial ended if Michael was thinking to sue Tom Sneddon and Tom said “he is really exhausted now and we are not taking about it yet”. Do you know if Michael attempted to sue Sneddon for Malicious Prosecution?

    ReplyDelete
  7. @ Mesrak
    MJ never took legal action against Sneddon. I think it's because he just wanted to move on with his life and get out of the USA. The statute of limitations has long since passed on malicious prosecution, I think. If he wanted to do it, he would have done it. But nothing he could have done to Sneddon would take back the embarrassing trial that he was put through, so that's probably why he didn't take action.

    It's a shame that Mesereau didn't get a book deal after the trial! He would have had so much to say! Remember, he was offered book deals after the trial, but only if he LIED and said MJ was really guilty, and of course he refused, as did most of the jurors, except 2 of them! They announced that they were gonna write a book about how they were "threatened" into saying MJ was guilty, but lost their deal when they were caught plagiarizing Maureen Orth's Vanity Fair garbage. Here's more info here:
    http://vindicatemj.wordpress.com/2010/06/16/what-happened-to-some-jurors-after-the-2005-trial/


    @ Bonnie: do you think that Sony paid Janet Arvizo to lie about the molestation? That's a very plausible theory, especially in light of everything you wrote, but I read this huge report on MJ, and in it it says that in January 2000, before she even met MJ, she sought a lawyer to represent her in a child molestation lawsuit against MJ. I think it was really HER idea for Gavin to meet MJ, and not Gavin's, which is what we've been told. It talks about this in Part 1: Anatomy of a Scam
    http://vindicatemj.wordpress.com/veritas-project/

    I also saw a posting about how Janet's original plan was to accuse MJ of molesting Gavin IF he would have died from cancer, which is what he was expected to do. She would have had Star and Davellin lie and say that they saw MJ molesting him while he was alive, but of course they wouldn't accuse MJ until AFTER Gavin died. But when Gavin beat the cancer, her plan was temporarily thwarted. I don't know how accurate that theory is, but I wanted to bring it to your attention. Let me know what you think!

    Open the link and scroll down to the "Brother of accuser as a probable witness - post death" title)
    http://www.themjifc.com/forum/innocent/48-conspiracy-against-michael-jackson-2.html

    ReplyDelete
  8. David – thanks for explaining why Michael did not sue Sneddon. I understand he was tired and wanted to get out the country, but there were monumental evidences against Sneddon to take him to court and be convicted. I am puzzled why Michael was letting these crooked people get away with murder. He probable was tired going back and forth to court for every little big thing, I guess.

    What you said about Janet Arvizo could probable be true. The lady is very well known con artist. She will do anything for $$$$. I am sure you remember the rape story she came up with blaming JC Penny security guard and letting her children lie about it, and how she was trying to extort money from Jay Leno. From the way how Sony was treated Michael, the possibility that she was approached by Sony from the get go was very likely.

    ReplyDelete
  9. jomc12 - Thank you for pointing that out too. Of course Branca is going to "save" the estate. He earns 10% of everything it takes in. Katherine and children get their flat rate monthly allowance regardless of how much the estate earns. The fans siding with John Branca are getting "Legacy" and "Money" confused. The legacy will be gone. Sony will own it if Branca isn't stopped. Did you see the note to fans on Reverent June Gatling's FB page? What do you make of that? I'm going to address it tomorrow, I would really like to get everyone's opinion on that.

    june - I addressed this in email, but in answer to the L.A. Gear thing, (why is it everyone had to sue Michael??? Geeesh!) Not everyone working with Michael in the past is a suspect. I have something that Randy said a while back stuck in my head and I wrote to you about it. Randy really isn't a big enough player in this. Plus, the people who are attacking THIS blog that are shilling for Branca are the ones insisting that colony and AEG are the main dogs responsible for Michael's death. THAT ALONE tells me they are not working together.

    Remember a month or so back? I said there seemed to be this battle going on under the surface? I still see that.

    ReplyDelete
  10. mistress - Okay, I did answer this in email but you said this -

    "I also noticed the fact that in the autopsy the weight and the height are not the ones Michael really had, and that many accident which happened to Michael are not inside the autopsy (the pepsi accident burn scar for ex is not even mentioned)
    I know they haven't been paid yet, because the trial is at the beginning. I think insurance is waiting the end of the trial before deciding to pay them."

    I DID notice that neither the burn scar, the lupus, NOR the broken leg (from fall from stage) were even mentioned in the autopsy report. However, they DID mention every medication that Murray said that he gave them. If the autopsy report was falsified, why wouldn't they cover up for Murray? They found HUGE AMOUNTS of propfol in Michael but no build up of any of the other opiates in his organs (ugh!!) or organ damage from long periods of drug abuse. If they were going to cover for Murray, WOULDN'T THEY HAVE FALSIFIED THAT PART?

    And we keep going back and forth on this AEG Good guy/bad guy discussion. All I said is that I don't believe they were the killers or complicit in his murder. There are signs and evidence I am putting together OFF THIS BLOG that tell me they are nothing more than a tool. I said I thought COLONY was trying to help Michael. AEG may have been a tool they used to do that.

    Theory only, but let's say Colony was trying to help Michael and even Anschutz corp. Okay, and they planned to put together these concerts as not only a way for Michael to catapult back into his element, but to financially get rid of Sony once and for all, they STILL WOULD HAVE NEEDED PERMISSION from Sony in order to get the licensing for Michael to perform his own songs . . . they still controlled that!

    to be cont.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Cont . . .

    Now Sony, seeing an opportunity, said, "sure, okay . . . we're going to let Michael do this concert thingey with you, but we want an interest there during production, so that Michael doesn't try to pull any fast ones, singing songs we didn't agree to ,etc.... so AEG reluctantly puts Branca in as one of the producers . . . that way Branca gets paid on the back end and they don't have to have the money up front to compensate him as part of this licensing agreement (remember, this is theory only, don't beat me up on this!).

    So Branca comes in and brings in DeLeo, or visa-versa (Deleo comes in first and brings in Branca, who knows at this point). DeLeo is a wild card too, so I 'm not sure if I even want to include him in this version of the theory yet. Anyway, them knowing someone within Sony wanted Michael either dead or unable to earn the income to buy his freedom from Sony ( can you flipping believe what this sounds like?) They had to do a lot of covering up.

    Question - Why would AEG lie about Michael's health if he was really in bad shape?

    I don't believe Michael was in as bad a shape as has been sold to us. I just don't. There are enough people OUTSIDE OF TII that saw Michael "thin" but healthy and lucid up through the night before he died. Also, the pictures of Michael in TII taken from the stills of the rehearsals shots DO NOT MAKE SENSE. If these pictures were all taken the last three days of rehearsals, they why does he look healthier in the last day during the "TDCAU" song then he did back in May and April running back and forth to Dr. Kleins in these disguises?

    I still stand by the body doubles in TII. Either doubles were used because Michael was NOT healthy enough to do rehearsals, or they used body doubles to make Michael look UNHEALTHY during rehearsals.

    Why would they want Michael to look UNHEALTHY?

    Because they wanted Branca and/or DeLeo to believe that Michael was never going to pull these concerts off . . . because if they though for one minute that he would pull these off . . . they knew Michael would be killed.

    So what happened?

    Somebody got to Michael.

    Peter Lopez was killed, Ayers was killed, Chandler possibly a hit and now Mesereau's assistant and her husband from the legal clinic.

    Somebody is still looking for something.

    If they have what they want, why are people still dying???

    ReplyDelete
  12. Mesrak (Mimi) - Your right. Tohme didn't even work for Michael, he worked for Colony. Tohme said he wasn't getting paid from Michael and he wasn't. I think aside from Michael declining to sue Sneddon for malicious prosecution was the fact that there was something bigger behind Sneddon, and they had to go for the giant in order to take down it's minions doing it's bidding.

    ReplyDelete
  13. David - You said:
    "do you think that Sony paid Janet Arvizo to lie about the molestation? That's a very plausible theory, especially in light of everything you wrote, but I read this huge report on MJ, and in it it says that in January 2000, before she even met MJ, she sought a lawyer to represent her in a child molestation lawsuit against MJ"

    I do believe Sony or someone within Sony or around the ATV catalog got to Janet, because she originally DEFENDED HIM on video tape. If she was trying to look for ways to sue him in 2000, why would she then defend him after Sneddon arrested him? Somebody did their homework, looked into her background, saw she was corruptible and got her to turn states evidence. I also believe that those same people were behind Chandler. As sick as he already was in the head, you have to listen to that phone conversation between him and Schwartz to pick up references to "people positioned" "I paid them" and "a plan that isn't just mine". No way a dentist would have the money to pay off government officials needed to do this evil bidding without someone with deep pockets backing him!

    I also believe that any stories out there like the one you mentioned above, could quite possibly be planted to discredit and distance both Chandler and Arvizo from the Sony people.

    Chandler only got a reported $1.5 mil of the settlement from Michael . . . that is not enough to live as high on the hog as he has until he was found dead in his luxury apartment. The Arvizos are in hiding. We've heard NOTHING from them since Michael died. Odd.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Bonnie, sorry, I disagree with your theory.
    Nobody of them wanted Michael healthy and alive, in my opinion. Neither Sony nor AEG.

    People are still dying because they KNOW too much.
    Lopez was manging Michael's finances to arrange it, and he also was telling in August 2009 that Michael's murder would have been solved very soon. And he died. Ayers, the same. Klein's assistant, whom had many contacts with Michael, especially since Michael went almost twice a week to Klein and now Klein is paying the DA Campaign not to be investigated, which happened.
    Ayers, in my opinion saw or heard (or both) many things, and he was very dangerous, so he had to die. And so on...

    For what I know, Thome was the manager of Michael if not there would have not been a firing, don't you think?
    For what I know and found, and probably you also will confirm, he came into Michael's life from Colony to managing the Neverland closure problem.


    Do you remember the phone calls to Mrs. June?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=mKB6l0eDBUE&feature=related

    Why doing a complete check on a person whom doesn't work with you? if he didn't work for him, why talking to Michael's representatives and lawyers AFTER Colony acquisition of Neverland?
    For my knowledge, he still remained as Michael's manager.....and as his manager he manged the catalogues too, through the Michael Jackson LLC., the same company insured by AEG.

    For what I know, Michael was haunted since many years from AEG but he didn't want to sign anything with them at all. I think there was a reason why.

    Here's my theory, for what it worth: Thome worked with Colony to manage Neverland problem; after this, he became Michael's manager and he made Michael believe he was in bad financial problems and firing Lopez for this; so he convinced Michael to sign with AEG (remember Thome was married with Philliphs wife) and Colony entered as a sponsor for TII.
    They hired Murray to keep Michael under physical and mental control, and there are many testimonies of this control from AEG, even distancing him from fans and family to keep him isolated, and going to his house to force him to go to reharsals.
    In my opinion, since we saw Ortega giving him food, it's not impossible that Kenny put something on it, using substances like ephedrine, to keep him awake, so as to use propofol.
    They put the clause in the insurance about drugs, and post poned the first date of the concert from 8 to 13 of july; and as soon as he died they started the drug addicted story.

    But coming to what you asked about the autopsy "If they were going to cover for Murray, WOULDN'T THEY HAVE FALSIFIED THAT PART?"

    No, in my opinion: Murray need to be guilty at public eyes so as to keep distant the attention from the real guilty ones; someone must do the scape goat here.He was the right man.
    ....and what about the fact that a bankrupty doc has enough money to pay a legal team including Britney Spear's lawyer (!!!), while he even cannot pay for his children's food?
    Who pays his bills since he didn't work for Sony but for AEG?

    But it's ok, it is only a theory...I 'm waiting for the pieces together you are collecting out side the blog, and maybe I did the wrong researches....for now I keep my doubt on AEG and CC. and wait. :P

    Love you!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Bonnie - your comment August 13 11:44: Peter Lopez was killed, Ayers was killed, Chandler possibly a hit and now Mesereau's assistant and her husband from the legal clinic.

    Can you clarify the part about "now Mesereau's assistant and her husband from the legal clinic." Did I miss this? Did someone connected to Tom Mesereau die?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Bonnie - you said "There are signs and evidence I am putting together OFF THIS BLOG that tell me they are nothing more than a tool". Where can we go to see what your are collecting outside this blog?

    ReplyDelete
  17. June, I'm not Bonnie, but here is a link to an article about the lady who was murdered, who volunteered at Mesereau's Free Legal Clinic.
    http://www.michaeljackson.com/us/node/914543

    ReplyDelete
  18. Just poking my head in trying to catch up...

    RE: the AEG debate, here's an interesting July 2009 article I ran across:
    Michael Jackson’s Estate: Concert Promoter AEG Live Attempts to Muzzle Katherine Jackson

    "While the press is focusing on the temporary administrators of the trust named in Jackson’s will and Katherine, we see a different slant to this story, of AEG seeking to keep the details of its involvement in Michael Jackson’s final months as well as his death, under wraps. Details which, we believe, if revealed, will result in a massive wrongful death lawsuit against AEG Live and Colony Capital, co-promoter of the 50 concerts slated in London."

    http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2009/07/michael-jacksons-estate-concert-promoter-aeg-live-attempts-to-muzzle-katherine-jackson/

    Lots of sources and info, it looks factual to me. But I'd be interested in what others think. It goes into some detail about Tohme and the issue with Julien's Auction House, lots more too.

    June, Bonnie twittered that. It is here:
    http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/crime/los-angeles-police-investigati/

    ReplyDelete
  19. More people Sneddon went after, who in turn filed suit against the county:

    THE CORRUPT HISTORY of District Attorney TOM SNEDDON...WHAT'S GOING ON IN SANTA BARBARA?

    http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?noframes;read=64536

    ReplyDelete
  20. TruthB and Rhoda - thanks for the links about Mesereau's employee's shooting. So sad, and, I think too coincidental; Lopez and Chandler (suicides?), Ayers and now this? If we supporters can spot the connection, let's hope the authorities do as well.

    As for Sneddon, his vendatta against Michael is well documented in the court records. While the 2 year statute of limitations may have run, I believe there is another method, by use of a grand jury. But I will leave further comment on that to someone more legally knowledgeable than myself.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Mistress - I'm going to have to do this in pieces. Your posts are too long so If I have to answer in two or three comments forgive me, okay?

    You said: "People are still dying because they KNOW too much.
    Lopez was manging Michael's finances to arrange it, and he also was telling in August 2009 that Michael's murder would have been solved very soon. And he died. Ayers, the same. Klein's assistant, whom had many contacts with Michael, especially since Michael went almost twice a week to Klein and now Klein is paying the DA Campaign not to be investigated, which happened.
    Ayers, in my opinion saw or heard (or both) many things, and he was very dangerous, so he had to die. And so on..."

    That's right, they know too much, but what is it they know?

    Peter was working on the reorganizing of Michael's businesses. This included the refinancing of the Neverland loan with Colony. There was also something from Anschutz corporation that was separate from the concerts . . . another project. I don't know what that was yet.

    Sony has what it wants. Branca has and is in the position he wants. They killed Lopez. Was it because of what he did or what he knows?

    Ayers was killed because he was Klein's assistant. Ayers wasn't killed because he knew something, he was killed to put some fear into Klein. Michael had plans. Michael most probably told his trusted confidente of 30+years. Peter was working on these same plans. Colony was helping Michael. There is something missing here and it doesn't have to do with the will. If it was related to a will, Peter Lopez would have come out with it long before he was killed in Dec. This is something else.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Mistress - You said: "For what I know, Thome was the manager of Michael if not there would have not been a firing, don't you think?
    For what I know and found, and probably you also will confirm, he came into Michael's life from Colony to managing the Neverland closure problem.


    Do you remember the phone calls to Mrs. June?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=mKB6l0eDBUE&feature=related

    Why doing a complete check on a person whom doesn't work with you? if he didn't work for him, why talking to Michael's representatives and lawyers AFTER Colony acquisition of Neverland?
    For my knowledge, he still remained as Michael's manager.....and as his manager he manged the catalogues too, through the Michael Jackson LLC., the same company insured by AEG. "


    Tohme WAS the manager of Michael. I never said he didn't work for Michael, I just said he wasn't paid by Michael. He was working for Michael PAID by Colony.

    The phone calls to June - I'm not so sure they are authentic. Listen to Michael's voice on that call. Does he sound upset? Stressed? Frightened? No . . . he almost sounds like he's amused. It's a bad quality recording but it almost sounds as if someone is reading a script. The phone call is plaid back on a tape recorder, not an answering machine. This call really bothers me. For as dangerous and controlling as Tohme is made out to be, why doesn't Michael sound more frantic on this call? There are other issues I will address in the blog about June tomorrow.

    You said:"For my knowledge, he still remained as Michael's manager.....and as his manager he manged the catalogues too, through the Michael Jackson LLC., the same company insured by AEG.
    "

    Tohme did not manage the catalogs. That is all handled by Sony. Martin Bashir is the CEO of the Sony ATV since April 2007. Whenever aquisitions are made it is joint between Michael and Sony . . . both have to vote and agree before any asset in that catalog is sold, licensed out or bought. Tohme in an interview said, "I am a stranger to this business". He did not manage the catalog. Michael Jackson, LLC or MJJ Productions, LLC is the umbrella corp with the other companies under it. The Catalog is managed and administered By Sony. Tohme did not have authorization to vote on that catalog.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Mistress - You said:"Here's my theory, for what it worth: Thome worked with Colony to manage Neverland problem; after this, he became Michael's manager and he made Michael believe he was in bad financial problems and firing Lopez for this; so he convinced Michael to sign with AEG (remember Thome was married with Philliphs wife) and Colony entered as a sponsor for TII.
    They hired Murray to keep Michael under physical and mental control, and there are many testimonies of this control from AEG, even distancing him from fans and family to keep him isolated, and going to his house to force him to go to reharsals.
    In my opinion, since we saw Ortega giving him food, it's not impossible that Kenny put something on it, using substances like ephedrine, to keep him awake, so as to use propofol.
    They put the clause in the insurance about drugs, and post poned the first date of the concert from 8 to 13 of july; and as soon as he died they started the drug addicted story. "



    Lopez was never fired. I know this, I know someone who knew him. He was never fired. He worked with Michael up through the end.

    The story is that Tohme signed Michael up with TII, but it was Barrack who called Anschutz FIRST and got a meeting together with Phillips. It is on the timeline. Tohme was inserted after the first two meetings with the Anschutz team and then became Michael's manager. The contract was signed before Tohme was hired.

    YOu said Tohme was married to Phillip's wife. Well, from personal experience, that means squat. I have an ex-husband. I am NOT friends with his sister! At all! There is a 50-50% chance that there is no love lost there so I discount that info. I look at it more from the angle that Barrack and Anschutz are fast friends, Tohme works for Barrack so they obviously knew each other . . . heck, that's probably how Tohme met Phillip's sister!

    I have no documentation that states anywhere that Colony is a sponsor of TII. Do you know where I can find this?

    We already know that there is connections between Anschutz, Colony, Barrack, AEGLive and Phillips and Tohme. That doesn't make them the bad guys. I want the CONNECTION between Sony and AEG as part of the conspiracy and it does not exist before 2009. Does not exist. None of them on either side of the curtain. Sony has always been a suspect. AEG is new on the scene.

    Did they just decide to jump on board later? Maybe, but why would they do that? Why? Where is the motivation? Sony controls this thing! Do you think two multi-billionaires are going to conspire with another corporation to KILL an artists as POPULAR as Michael for the paltry little bread crumbs that Sony would throw them? They are going to put their empires at risk for something that Sony conspired to control? These people aren't stupid. There is the reward/risk ratio at play here.

    I know a few things about Murray too and we are so close to the date of the trial, I think it is worth waiting to see what comes of that.

    Should be very, very interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Mistress - the drugs would have shown up in the autopsy. It did not. Even if the autopsy was falsified, they would have most certainly tried to pin any drugs given to Michael on Murray. Why report only the drugs Murray said he gave him? There was no drug build up in his organs or organ damage. Now if they were going to try to sell us a drug addict story, wouldn't they have notated ALL the drugs found in his system, including buildup and organ damage?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Mistress - I agree with you wholeheartedly . . . Murray cannot afford the attorneys representing him. So who is paying for them? Colony? Anschutz or Sony?

    Let me ask you this . . . Is Murray even really a doctor?

    ReplyDelete
  26. JUne - Did you get the links people posted before I got here about the Legal clinic assistant of Mesereau's?

    Mesrak (Mimi) - I am collecting this in a separate folder on my computer. I can't put this stuff online yet. I am waiting to see what happens because if I'm right, I don't want to jeopardize any ongoing investigations.

    Rhoda - Thank you for posting that.

    truthbtold2all - I remember that article about Katherine, the estate and AEG. Re-read that article carefully. What you stated in your post above is a clue. Remember the confidentiality agreements everyone working TII had to sign.

    TII was NOT the only people getting these confidentiality agreements. People at business meetings at hotels, restaurants and visiting the Jackson house. Which leads me to believe that the "production" is bigger than TII and TII was just a small part of the bigger picture. Why would people visiting the Jackson household need to sign confidentiality agreements? Or people at restaurants that the Jackson family goes to, or Hotel employees and other places? This is BEFORE he was murdered.

    AEG ",,,Keeping the details of his final months under wraps" . . .

    ON Sneddon, I was sent info from Gina who found links to Sneddon's lack of campaign contribution records. She did a search for me and the man ran all five of his re-election campaigns un-opposed! http://www.smartvoter.org/2002/03/05/ca/sba/race/3035/#sneddon_t One guy who ran against his friend found himself under arrest with stacked charges. The man ended up sueing Sneddon and Santa Barbara County.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Mistress - Back on Peter Lopez, a thought:

    Michael died June 25, 2009. Branca waited 10 days to see if Katherine would file intestate which she did until Branca suddenly shows up with the fraudulent will. Peter Lopez had plenty of time to counter that will with a recent one if he had one. He was killed in December of 2009. Why was Peter holding off turning in the will if he had it?

    Because they were waiting for something. What were they waiting for? Anyone?

    ReplyDelete
  28. Intriguing Bonnie! Do you know what they were waiting for?

    ReplyDelete
  29. The mainstream media which is controlled by the powers that be, know that the accusation itself will make many susceptible people believe someone is guilty of a crime. It won't matter whether they are found innocent or not. It won't matter that the rogue cop spent millions of dollars to try and get something on him. But worst of all it won't matter to the susceptible that the children never matter, just the destruction of an innocent man.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.