Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Every Good Song Has a Bridge

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Every Good Song Has a Bridge

Michael and Orianthi At Rehearsals

September 16, 2010 – Every Good Song Has a Bridge

2 John 1:7 – “For many deceivers have gone out into the world who do not confess Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.”

Where do I start?

Hit One:


I had part two of the Rowe book commentary to post and it was done. Before I finished one proof-read, my email starts binging off the speakers the night of the 14th (if I had speakers . . . they fried a few days ago. Those of you sending me Youtube links, I am backlogged until I get out to Office Max or someplace to get new ones).

So I’m working on more of Rowe’s book and I see emails coming in. It is people sending me the latest news item. Katherine Jackson is now suing AEG. I ignore the first couple of emails thinking this is a joke. The press getting bored? I continue commentating on paragraphs from the book.

A couple more emails come in and I finally click on one of the links sent to me from CBS news.

“The suit contends AEG and its agents told Michael Jackson the company would provide the equipment and hire Dr. Conrad Murray to care for him so he could perform at the concerts in London.”


I then did a search on “Katherine Jackson Files Against AEG” and came up with the following links. I clicked on, and opened each one. I noted time and date it was posted.

TMZ
Posted on 9/15/2009 at 4:10pm

MTV News Posted 09/15/2010 at 8:57pm

Yahoo News Posted 09/15/2010 at 7:39 pm

CBS News posted 09/15/2010 no time posted

Radar Online: posted 09/15/2010 posted 09/15/2010 8:39pm

Miami Harold posted 09/15/2010 time not posted.

MSN posted 09/15/2010 at 7:04pm.

TMZ of course, was the first out of the gate with the news (anyone surprised? Not me!) All the other news sites were almost three hours behind TMZ and all of them were pretty close to saying the same thing with the same people quoted. It kind of reminds me of the opposing politicians that run on different platforms but nothing ever changes no matter who you vote into office.

So other than discovering something that we already know (that journalists don’t really have to work for a living as long as they can cut and paste), What really has changed?

I am happy to see that at last the Jackson family is working together.

Hit 2: Then some of my more loving commenting members sent me the following Twitters from Randy Jackson:


“Today was a good day.”

“I know I'm quiet, I don't tweet much.”

“Last year I promised that I would not rest until the truth is exposed
about what happened to my brother's passing. May he rest in peace.”

“I am doing my best to keep that promise. On this day my family has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against AEG. I am proud of my family.”

“What happened to my loving brother should NOT have happened. I really miss him.”

“Please understand it's not over, we have a long way to go. There is more to come. We are just getting started.”

“This could not have been done without the support of the fans. We're all together in this. Thank you for your continued support and patience.” 



Photo Shoot Anne Leibowitz



Most of you know how I feel about AEG’s culpability in Michael’s murder. Truthfully, I was very disappointed in Randy’s twitters. I don’t even want to tell you how disappointed I was. I slapped my computer screen. If you knew whose picture was on my desktop, you would know how completely upset I was. (Don’t worry, my computer still works and Michael didn’t feel a thing). Then I got down on my knees in my office, put my head on the seat of my chair and I prayed.

Hit 3: I knew this one was coming. The Samantha Facebook page and TINI sites were back up with new, enhanced pictures with “scientific evidence” that the photos were not photo shopped. (I really don’t think they believed I would be surprised by this, but their purpose wasn’t convincing me, their purpose was to destroy the reputation of this blog).

Hit 4: My ISP goes down for the second time this week just as I am posting a reply on my blog and despite my patience (yeah, it was gone on hit 2) and waiting an hour, it does not go back up. So I shut everything down and say another prayer and put my head down on the desk and cry harder than I’ve cried since November of last year.

I went to bed but could I sleep? No. I took two Benedryl because my nose was so stuffed up and then I had to explain to my husband what was wrong while he got up to get ready for work. He told me, “Don’t let it get you down. You're really making these people scramble. You're costing them money. But remember, God’s time, not yours.” (shut up was a word that for the time being, I kept to myself).

So what does a person do? Give up? Retract every bit of research she’s done over the past 14+ months? (hits 1 and 2)

Apologize to people who lied? (hit 3)

Slap my computer again, tell the picture on it “I hate you” then kiss it, tell it your sorry then cry some more? (If this was fiction and I was watching it on T.V. I would be laughing, but it isn’t and I’m not).

Drop back and punt?

Hit 1: TMZ announced another “first breaking” story about Katherine now suing AEG which consequently shows up on other media outlets gradually throughout the evening. Why this is bigger news than Joe Jackson suing them I have no idea. But the same evening, it is announced that Dr. Murray (or Murray’s lawyer) is moving to dismiss Joe’s case. Though it hasn’t been dismissed yet, Miss Katherine is now suing AEG. Joe is included on the complaint and the GOOD THING about this is that the family is working together. (Yeah!!!)

I still do not believe AEG is guilty of what they are being accused of. But I am one of a VERY FEW that believe this. The whole world is against me on this and I will have to just face that. The truth will come out as we have been told. I have to learn a little patience. I have done enough research to feel confident enough in my belief that this will all be revealed when the truth is told, which brings me to Randy Jackson’s Tweets.

Hit 2: Randy Jackson’s Twitter posts –

“Today was a good day.”

“I know I'm quiet, I don't tweet much.”

– What a strange thing to say. “I don’t like to talk much…”

“Last year I promised that I would not rest until the truth is exposed
about what happened to my brother's passing. May he rest in peace.”

“I am doing my best to keep that promise. On this day my family has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against AEG. I am proud of my family.”

“What happened to my loving brother should NOT have happened. I really miss him.”

– All agree on this.

“Please understand it's not over, we have a long way to go. There is more to come. We are just getting started.” –

There is more to come. It is not over. We have a long way to go. We are just getting started. And while all of that is true, I am still perplexed at the whole concept of announcing to the public that there is “more to come” in an investigation.

There is a murder investigation going on (isn’t there?) Even Goldman waited until the verdict in a trial before going after O.J. Simpson. But . . . .

But. (With one “t”)

Although I am not convicting AEG yet, this is not my show. I write a blog, I write it for Michael and for people to be made aware of what was done to him. It’s not for me. I don't care whether people believe I'm right or wrong because that is not what this blog is about. It is about awareness. I write on what I find and hopefully people can put some pieces together. You take the information and hopefully find some answers. If I had ALL the answers I'd be sitting in Aruba somewhere with a mini umbrella in my pink drink.

I am still getting my answers from Michael. Michael never implicated AEG but he DID implicate Sony. Whatever is going on needs to happen. Regardless of the petty battles out there, this is justice for Michael. Randy is going to get his request for continued patience and support. Let the Jacksons do what they need to do.

Computer Man Chatting w/ Fans


Hit 3: Samantha and TINI – I am sure as the day is long about this one. No one is going to convince me I didn’t see what I saw and you most assuredly are not going to convince Ginny. Anyone can do what I did and you don’t need to leave the house. The troublemakers will no longer be able to post to the blog and they can find their own “bulletin board” to cause trouble on. Problem solved. All posts will be moderated. I have never had to pull down my blog or close my facebook page to “reconstruct” a truth to cover a lie. That’s how I sleep at night. People are not as stupid as they want others to believe. End of this subject.

Hit 4: That problem too has been solved. Maybe “FIOS” needed a break from all the typing I do. (???) I will look at it for what it was . . . God’s way of telling me to slow down and stop trying to anticipate his moves.

Am I going to change anything that I am doing?

I already have.

By the way. I have been informed that many of my links on this blog to Michael’s songs no longer work. I am going to leave them up. Why?

Because I want people to know what Sony is doing, how vindictive they are, and how little they really care for the fans that fill their pockets. I also wanted to announce that thanks to Lady “V”, I have a whole set of his songs from “Off the Wall” to “Definitive Collection” including “Invincible”. One day when Michael’s children or family are in control of them, I will pay them directly since they are the ones who were supposed to be getting all the profits from those by now anyway, had Michael not been defrauded.

There is a lot at stake here. You are not required to agree or disagree with me. The evidence of things going on will be posted here and you can take that evidence and do your own research. The childish attacks and posts by mental midgets from Juvenile Hall (where I guess Sony does most of its hiring now), will no longer be an issue.

The next blog update will be about . . . Michael.

Oh, and anyone sending abusive posts will not only be deleted before they hit this blog as a comment, they will be reported.

NEW IN THANKS TO TRUTHBTOLD2ALL:
  
RICHARD FINE IS FREE!!! http://www.facebook.com/FreeRichardFine

61 comments:

  1. Hhmmm...I'm curious why Katherine's suit and Randy's tweets affected you like that.

    Ohhh...hot sands and fancy drinks, now that's my cuppa tea!

    YAY!...Richard I. Fine is FREE!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good for you Bonnie Don't let $ony Bully you
    Lots of MJ fans in Europe are with you and
    Michael has more fans in Europe then America
    so European fans really matters and we know
    what $ony did to Michael was so evil and then they
    Murder him for his ATV/$ony Catalog. Thank You
    Bonnie I know you love Michael and you want Justice for him. These people who have high-jack
    Michael Name I don't know what they want but not
    Justice Michael Jackson they got their own agenda it so sad people use Michael when he was
    alive and they are using him in death. It hard to
    trust any one when it come MJ the only people
    you can trust Prince Paris and Blanket Michael
    Children God Bless them and you Bonnie.
    Please Don't Give Up on Michael I know you want
    the truth so do I and everyone who care about
    Michael and love him. I wish you all the Best
    Bonnie. Thank You xxx L.O.V.E.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Glad to see you back....Keep God first, rise above the pettiness, remain open minded and think outside the box....Your research is appreciated!!!

    Truth Is Freedom!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've read the 18 pages of Katherine/MJ3's complaint about AEG's reckless treatment of Michael. The contract AEG signed with Michael seems very oppressive and written primarily to benefit AEG. Also, the term "indentured servitude" came to my mind. I don't understand how Michael's representatives agreed to Michael signing this contract. Was Tohme the only one representing him for this contract? Did Tohme actually READ the contract before Michael signed it? Is Tohme even a lawyer? I don't beleive so. According to one source (see below), "Tohme would not reveal any information about his life or career other than to confirm that he is a U.S. citizen, a "self-made man" who works in the world of finance and was raised in Los Angeles." He also describes himself as "an avowed music business neophyte." This doesn't make him a bad person but it is odd representation to say the least. Of course, Michael did eventually fire him after he authorized an auction that Michael didn't give permission for and was apparently sending threatening communications to MJ business associates, or so it is claimed, among other things.

    Source:
    http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1615320/20090706/jackson_michael.jhtml

    As for Katherine's complaint, you already know that it alledges that Murray was infact hired by AEG and that AEG was basically using Murray to make sure Michael made it to rehearsals apparently even when Michael wasn't well. Certainly the timeline and events listed on the complaint are heartbreaking stuff. The idea that AEG representatives went to MJ's house and were supposedly using "tough love" by reading him the "riot act" in order to compell him to attend rehearsals is almost too much to take. And then the accounts of him arriving upset, disoriented, freezing, on I believe 2 occasions gave me a sick feeling in my stomach. I don't know what to think...:-(

    Katherine (and family) have apparently retained a very high calibre attorney who has won many multi-million (even billion) dollar corporate cases including ones against General Motors, the tobacco industry and Caterpillar to name just a few. Source: http://www.psandb.com/panish.html An impressive resume indeed!

    I have a theory concerning the order of actions taken so far. First, Murray is charged with involuntary manslaughter and his case will eventually go to trial. In the meantime, Joseph Jackson files a wrongful death suit against Murray and then Katherine (and family essentially even though they are not specifically named on the complaint) goes after AEG. I think the timing makes a difference too since I believe the family wants to put as much pressure on AEG and Co. as possible in the short term, especially since Murray's trial is drawing near. I don't beleive the family is going to stop with Murray and AEG (Phillips, Ortega, etc.). I believe this will be a multi-year process where they start at the bottom of the tree of corruption and work their way up to the big fish. Namely, Sony. Sony is not named in Katherine's current claim but I'm sure the family has plans to hold individuals there responsible in time. Set precedent first with Murray and AEG to establish the facts and move up from there. You have to build the foundation of a house first before you can put up the walls!

    Anyway, that's my theory.

    Do you feel this idea has merit at all? Certainly you've done alot more research than I could possibly do.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Bonnie,

    Sounds like you have had one terrible week. Good to see you're still encouraged though. I have to say that I'm angry over all the lies that Randy Phillips and Frank Dileo have fed us and if anything good comes out of the family's lawsuit against AEG it will be exposing them as liars. I think that Katherine does owe it to the children but especially to Prince to proceed with this. That poor boy should never had been forced to witness his father lying there dying. I can't imagine the trauma that would have caused him.

    Bonnie, whether or not it can ever be proved in a court of law, it is now on the record that $ony brought Michael to the place he was in June 2009. $ony, enabled by mainstream media that fed off Michael's every misfortune and assisted in the deconstruction of a good man's popularity and reputation. We all now know that for nearly a decade $ony had done all in its power to kill Michael's career and destroy his financial security. For a man who said he never wanted to tour again, he had no other option for survival in the end but to do it and bravely he faced what he felt he had to face.

    So I believe that final drip of Propofol that Murray administered and which killed Michael was really just the last nail in Michael's coffin. I believe it is a miracle that Michael survived as long as he did and a testament to the strength of his character and love for his children. I also believe that John Branca now has no excuse not to refinance the ATV/$ony catalogue and if he doesn't then this blatantly demonstrates where his continuing loyalties lie. A lot of good has come out of the fan base. Letters have been sent to the Bar Association and District Attorney. Branca has to publicly watch his step now and he has been made more accountable. Michael's admirers are watching and waiting and whatever his intentions were previously, all that has changed. Of course it's not good enough that he is allowed to sit there making his money off Michael lording it over Michael's family but it is the best outcome we can achieve thanks to the Probate Judge. I pray for the day that Michael's children are old enough to legally challenge that Will and I hope that they do so and reclaim their legacy.

    Hugs to you Bonnie.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Truthbtold - Why did Randy's tweets and the news of the AEG lawsuit effect me that way? Because it was a blow to my faith and I didn't understand right away what was going on. It just took time for me to realize that it's now always going to be an easy answer. The truth is still there, and will be revealed in due time. Like I said, I am not a patient person, but I dust myself off and move on.

    Ella - Thank you for your comment. I agree with you. Michael's REAL FRIENDS are not on Facebook trying to build a fan base of their own, they are working behind the scenes taking care of justice for him. I would never give up on him and I hope his fans and those that love him don't give up on justice for him. God Bless you and all our friends there in Europe! ♥

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sandy,
    I agree that the Jackson family is attempting to work their way up the chain. Murray had to give the details that were mentioned in the lawsuit or is their some one else who could/did provide those details? I have more questions but I will wait and see what other info appears in the media.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bonnie, I was SO happy to see you back after all that has occurred, as Michael said, keep the faith don't let nobody get you down.

    Moderating the comments is such a good idea.

    SandyK, you are absolutely "right on" about that AEG-MJCLLC-MJ contract, totally one sided and oppressive. Tohme is not/was not an attorney. According to the link you provided, he came into a "partnership" with Michael, interesting .... Personally I think he had a partnership with AEG! Did you see the paragraph in the AEG-MJCLLC-MJ contract providing for $200,000 month payment to TT International? Isn't that Tohme's company? That's in addition to whatever Tohme was getting as MJ's "manager". And it seems that Michael's incremental "salary" was contingent on AEG receiving verification that he had performed five or six "first class" shows, imagine demanding that from Michael Jackson? Michael was a commodity to AEG, and Michael was in fear and isolation.

    I also found the events in the complaint heartbreaking and sadly true. I watched the film, TII, several times to confirm my belief, which I still hold, that it was tossed together from footage of the last few days of Michael's life which were filmed in the event that ..... we know the rest. Yes, this will take time; however the foundation has been laid, and over time Sony and all the lies, distortions, manipulations, falsehoods and steps taken to ruin Michael financially will be brought to light. To come full circle, the actions of Sony brought Michael to the place he was in June 2009.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bonnie – I am so glad to see your post. The decision you took to moderate comments is a very good idea. It sure will prevent some of the hatful comments coming from those who pretend to love Michael.

    You said, “I write a blog, I write it for Michael and for people to be made aware of what was done to him……..it is about awareness. I write on what I find and hopefully people can put some pieces together. You take the information and hopefully find some answers”. That’s exactly why I follow your blog. What I have learned and continue learning from your blog that make me be aware of what was done to Michael by music industries, is priceless. Each blog entry you have done so far contains wealth of information for those of us who wish to learn what ever happened to Michael all his life.

    You are right what is the difference what Jo did when he was suing AEG and now Katherine doing it? Is it a big deal because she is the one Michael put in his will?

    I am so glad too that the Jackson families are working together. However, when Randy said “there is more to come” is he implying they might be other parties involve beside AEG? It’s sounds to me like that.

    ReplyDelete
  10. SandyK, you've raised some good questions in your post. My understanding of Thome's role is that he was able to help Michael financially through his contact with Barrack and Colony. I have no hard evidence but I think when Michael returned to the US, his finances were in very bad shape. At some stage Michael got rid of Raymone Bain and seemed to favour Thome - perhaps because of his promises and connections.

    Leonard Rowe claims that Michael's legal advisor with the AEG contract was organised by AEG. However, once again this could just be Rowe's speculation and interpretation. Tohme at that time appeared to be Michael's representative and in charge of Michael's company and was remunerated (in the contract) to the tune of $100,000 a month. I assume that Michael had to pay this $100,000 out of his revenue from the concerts. Strange though that Michael's own personal management costs would be in that contract. Wouldn't this just be another personal expense for Michael to look after himself? This sounds like AEG looking out for their buddy. So even if Michael fired Thome, he was still in that contract until it ended collecting his fee for doing what?

    The fact is though that we still don't have rock solid verification that the contract available on the www is the real contract.

    How does the Jackson family rope $ony into all of this? I don't have a clue. We all know about the $ony conspiracy to destroy Michael's career and finances but how on earth can anybody find cold hard evidence to implicate them directly and physically with Michael's death? Only Conrad Murray knows the real answers to what happened that day and he obviously does not believe that the truth will set him free. In fact his lies just seem to compound each other.

    Morally though, $ony conspired to bring Michael down and it succeeded. From Invincible right through to his death, Michael seemed to do nothing else but attempt to survive the worst. He never had the opportunity to rebuild his career and his reputation was in tatters because of those horrible allegations. I don't believe he ever regained his physical health either. The media never let up on him year in and year out. So morally, $ony is guilty. I just hope that some hard evidence is uncovered to implicate this company. Tommy Mattola should be held accountable for the pain and grief he caused Michael. In an ideal world, there would be justice for Michael but nothing about this world is ideal because money and power always rule unfortunately. Still, I cling to the hope that there will be justice. In the meantime, $ony will never receive one cent from me. It's the only power I have and it's one I assert on principle for the way they treated Michael. I personally find it insulting that they want to bastardise Michael's name by releasing music which is not even authenticated nor endorsed by Michael as his own work.

    ReplyDelete
  11. MissShae - I needed a break anyway. I hadn't cried for Michael in a while and I was due. Back to back phone calls kept me from writing anything but the break was good. I agree!!! Keep God first. It is what Michael would have done. Thank you for the reminder. :o)

    SandyK - You're killing me (Long one, I hope I catch everything. If not, just say something).

    "This doesn't make him a bad person but it is odd representation to say the least. Of course, Michael did eventually fire him after he authorized an auction that Michael didn't give permission for and was apparently sending threatening communications to MJ business associates, or so it is claimed, among other things."

    Tohme - There was a lot put out in the press about him that was negative off the bat. Michael was also a very private man and look what they did to him. I remind myself of that every time I read something negative about ANYONE in the press now. This is a public image war as much as it is a financial one. there are things getting exposed not only about Sony but about the media, the press and their hand in forming public opinion and how much everyone has been lied to. The news out there is only the best money can buy.

    You know where I heard the first mention of "tough love"? Karen Faye. Whether I believe her now or not is irrelevant. The Jacksons are doing what they need to do and whatever that is, I am behind them. That doesn't mean I think AEG is guilty of anything. Only that I believe the Jackson's are doing what they need to do. I pray. There are people that took risks and put their necks out for this to happen and Michael did the same when he tried to fight for other artists.

    When you are not sure what is going on you just pray and know God is going to sort it out. Sandy, you are so close.

    Karin - I can't imagine the trauma that would have caused Prince either. It's almost unconscionable that any "doctor" would do that to a little boy (sorry Prince! I know you're not "little!"). The truth in this will be sorted out. I have faith in that. Like I told SandyK, there are people that put their necks out and they did it for Michael. You are going to see at the end of this who his true friends are.

    I believe that the Jackson's could not go directly after Sony and would have a really hard time proving anything. AEG was there, there is no discounting that, as much as it pains me to say it, but this is just another lawsuit in a long line that may or may not hold water. In a way, I feel bad for AEG because they may very well be the monkey in the middle. We still don't know the truth about the hiring of Murray, we still don't know who REALLY he was working for and we know that there is a bad element out there implicating AEG and we also know that Randy WAS concerned about certain people turning his parent's heads the wrong way. Did they fix this problem?

    I think they did . . . but please give time for this to work out before we start lynching people.

    Richard Fine is free . . . keep praying. I'm going to condense and post the prayer that I have been saying for the past week. Even if you do not agree with me about previous postings, I am asking people to read this prayer, with feeling and heart once before they start their day and once before they retire at night. It's a protection prayer. I will post that some time tomorrow.

    ReplyDelete
  12. @Ella,

    I am so happy to hear Michael’s fans in Europe supporting Bonnie. I know Michael has very loyal fans who truly understand what $ony did to him more than here in USA.

    You are right Europe fans really do matter. Thank you so much for your support. It is very encouraging to hear the support from other countries around the world.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Bonnie a big hug for you, wanted to thank you on this blog in search of truth.
    I have maintained the theory of contradiction in what Michael and the media are concerned, they deserve to test their own bitter medicine ...
    Please do not be tolerant of rude comments to the Jackson family ever, can not afford it, I love Michael and his family and it really hurts this deal especially Mrs. Katherine is horrible.
    I'm waiting for a long time now and this is the moment ...
    God bless you

    ReplyDelete
  14. According to me, this was the first article on the subject, not TMZ.

    http://x17online.com/celebrities/michael_jackson/x17_exclusive_jackson_family_suing_aeg_in_wrongful_death_lawsuit-09152010.php

    Posted by X17online on September 15, 2010 3:11 PM

    Is it the same?

    It's just a question, do not fight ... It's real question. Both tabloids are the same? Thank you by advance.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Peeks out from underneath the safety of the big rock in Bonnie's cyber-backyard...

    Okay, hi everyone...

    I find myself in agreement that AEG is merely the first step, in this whole nightmarish "whodunnit" regarding Michael. The thing here that concerns me however is a potential legal loophole that AEG DOES (like it or not) possess: The UNSIGNED contract regarding Murray. Neither an AEG rep nor Michael signed it.

    I think it's obvious as to why Michael didn't sign that contract-- it gave too much "power" to Murray and left zero for Michael. So, that's a "no-brainer" if you ask me. But, since the contract with Murray wasn't signed by Michael, it obviously could not be signed by AEG either.

    Sorry to everyone, but email correspondence between AEG and Murray only establishes "intent to hire", and it is rather explicit on what Murray's needs were as far as providing medical care for Michael but little else. Also, don't forget this now...Murray was neither paid by AEG or Michael's Estate for his services (and Murray HAS tried to sue for payment but had been unsuccessful in BOTH attempts). Again it's due to the non-signing of the contract. So, I advise everyone to keep their eyes and ears open regarding that issue. Sweeping that point underneath the proverbial carpet and ignoring such will prove to be a huge mistake in this matter.

    I will agree that it is wiser that Katherine has listed Joseph as one of the plaintiffs in this matter because it does get rid of Leonard Rowe (who truly cannot be trusted) and Joe's need for the previously fired by Tom Mesereau (in MJ's 2005 trial) and incredibly inept Brian Oxman!!! (Sorry, but I remember his falling asleep during the early days of the trial.) Can anyone here really trust that showoff??? I sure as heck can't, and won't. Just how Oxman is able to keep his license to practice law just beats the heck out of me. Ugh...

    In any case, I wish them luck. This is going to be one heck of a battle, so strap yourselves in!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Thank youf or your response Bonnie.

    BTW, when you said "you're killing me" and "you are so close," what did you mean?? (She asks sheepishly.)

    O.K. Ready for some total wild-ass speculation that I have absolutely no proof for? (BTW, sorry for the language.) Could there be any possibility, that this entire story has been orchastrated and driven by questionable elements, perhaps over-seas organized crime elements, from within Sony that planted the seed with AEG to pursue Michael inorder to get him to do a very lucrative and at the same time impossible concert tour? Could Sony ultimately have put people such as Murray, Tohme, Ortega, Phillips, Anschutz, Branca, in place, with knowledge about Michael's debts and inability to complete a strenuous tour, with the intention of forcing him to default on the contract for the soul purposes of squeezing the Sony/ATV catalogue from him and assisting in increasing the value of the Michael Jackson brand so that they could ultimately profit from it?? A type of vicious, callous, insider trading if you will. I know this is a reach, but I thought I'd put it out there anyway. Like I said, no proof, just my imagination running wild.

    Something that isn't speculative and currently happening as we speak, is the offense Sony is committing against MJ3 by issuing previously unreleased music of Michael's in November. As we all know, Michael left that legacy to MJ3, not Sony!

    ReplyDelete
  17. BTW, I'd also like to welcome Michael's fans in Europe!!!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Bonnie, what did I miss Here? What's going on?

    Did you get abusive posts on your blog?

    ReplyDelete
  19. estrella5789 - Thank you for that link. That didn't come up on the searches when I first did them, but yes, that does look like an earlier version. My point in posting all of those was to show you how the press plays "follow the leader" instead of "researching" what they print. GUPPIES!!!!!

    Lady - I have a big rock in my cyber-yard? That means I'm going to have to throw it over the fence before I mow! sigh! You brought up some very good points about Murray's contract not being signed. And with Murray supposedly not getting paid, wonder who's paying for his lawyers? (and his vacation?) Murray has always been the fall-guy in this. For now, it almost seems like he is being ignored in favor of going after AEG.

    I agree with the "intent to hire" and in written form, there was no contract. So what is the law in CA on verbal contracts? Enforceable?

    I agree that Katherine filing the lawsuit, including Joe (consolidation of forces?) will I believe FINALLY make things more effective. Too many influences out there trying to divide and conquer both the family and the friends and fans of Michael. And as you said, it eliminates the need for Oxman and Rowe who have done little to nothing (in my opinion) toward justice other then sell information to the tabloids and write self-serving books.

    ReplyDelete
  20. SandyK - You said "BTW, when you said "you're killing me" and "you are so close," what did you mean?? (She asks sheepishly.)"

    I said "you're killing me" because you're killing me. (trying to answer all that in one post, LOL!) and "you are so close" when you suggested:

    "I don't beleive the family is going to stop with Murray and AEG (Phillips, Ortega, etc.). I believe this will be a multi-year process where they start at the bottom of the tree of corruption and work their way up to the big fish. Namely, Sony."

    Multi-year process and AEG taking the heat for what will ultimately be a stepping stone in the overall attempt to bridge a gap that could not have been breached before.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Josie - Just trouble makers. People thinking that the blog was their personal bulletin board with nothing to contribute but an argument. We won't have that problem anymore and the blog will be friendly and constructive.

    How was your first week at work?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Welcome to Michael's European fans! You all are very important in this cause, partly because it seems you have not been so easily brainwashed about Michael through the trash tabloids.

    Good theory SandyK! But for your "wild-ass speculation", I have this:

    Anschutz - He is a reclusive billionaire whose guiding force is religion. "A disciplined man who rises each day at 4.30am, he runs marathons and rarely drinks alcohol." He once declared that “family is first and everything else is second”. He supports family values in entertainment - that is a BIG plus about him for me. As of 2006, he had not given an interview since 1978. "He showed entrepreneurial flair aged 9 when he set up a drinks stand on roller skates to serve local students." LOL Reminds me of my kids serving lemonade out front to entice people to their yard sale.

    My only reservation with him so far is that he was close to Bush.

    What keeps jumping into my mind about a lot of what appears on the surface to be chaos are Michael's own words: "They never thought I could out-think them." - from memory so may not be exact.

    Lady...so good to see you! ;o) Good point about the email correspondence. Ok...strapping in! Lord knows I need some excitement in my life! LOL

    Josie - Lucky you...you were spared a lot of grief! Hope you're enjoying your job.

    To everybody - good to see so much valuable input without having to worry about troublemakers!

    I look forward to your prayer, Bonnie. Good job and thanks for all you do!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Lady, I agree with you concerning the difficulty of the "oral" contract with Murray. As you said, Murray was never paid for his services which would, be default, imply and seal a contract between AEG and Murray. The thing that confuses me is that Katherine's complaint implies a written agreement was made between AEG and Murray and that Murray agreed to that agreement, although, to your point, it doesn't say AEG, Murray and/or Michael actually signed that agreement. Despite the lack of signatures, Murray immediately started to perform services per that agreement.

    Katherine's complaint:

    The complaint states that AEG retained Murray "to be Jackson's personal "concierge" physician and to exclusively treat Jackson. AEG states it wanted Murray to get Jackson to attend rehearsals and perform. AEG said it would hire Murray and pay him $150,000.00 per month for 11 months commencing May, 2009, through March, 2010..." The complaint also alledges that "AEG promised it would pay for and provide all of Murray's medical equipment, supplies, personnel, and treatments administered to Jackson. AEG and Murray agree Murray would start immediately. Murray did begin immediately." The complaint also states that on "May 8, 2009, AEG confirmed the agreement IN WRITING. The written confirmation stated AEG would provide Murray with Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation equipment and a nurse during his services. On May 8, 2009, Dr. Murray ACCEPTED the contract's terms." The complaint uses the shorthand of "THE AEG-MURRAY AGREEMENT" to reference this agreement in the remainder of the document. (Page 6 of PDF file)

    Source:
    http://www.radaronline.com/sites/radaronline.com/files/Katherine%20Jackson%20vs%20AEG.pdf

    I asked myself whether oral agreements are binding and came up with this:

    "Oral contracts CAN be as binding as written contracts. But without a written record, it can difficult to prove what you have agreed to. If your deal goes south, you may be endlessly chasing the truth. Make it easy on yourself and write up an agreement.

    Often parties enter into agreements that are partially oral and partially written, based on a handshake and a few letters or memos that may indicate some of the aspects of the agreement without actually being contracts themselves. In this case, the "agreement" is contained partly in the oral agreement and partly in the letters and memos."

    Source:
    http://www.allbusiness.com/legal/contracts-agreements/2380-1.html

    Also,

    "As long as the good or service provided is legal, any oral agreement between two parties can constitute a binding legal contract."

    Source:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract

    There WAS a written agreement between Murray and AEG according to Katherine's complaint. Such a claim couldn't be formally made unless there is proof to back it up. There is a "paper" trail, so to speak, or written record of intent and Murray started to perform services per that intent. At the end of the day, this IS a contract.

    ReplyDelete
  24. "Multi-year process and AEG taking the heat for what will ultimately be a stepping stone in the overall attempt to bridge a gap that could not have been breached before." - Bonnie

    Definitely! AEG's business practice with Michael was oppressive and unethical and they deserves to take some heat! Sony, even worse! Hopefully the "gap" will be "bridged" as you say.

    When the fire is started at the bottom of the tree, it can only go up and hopefully some of those very top branches can be consumed in the process, in time and in context of the justice system/law.

    Never give up Jackson's!! I'm sure (I hope) they never will...:-)

    With that said, and the idea that this WILL be a multi-year process, it will be no surprise to me if MJ3 will be continueing to fight this battle in some way in their adult years. An awful thought!

    Bonnie, thanks for your response! and sorry for "killing" you, so to speak...:-)

    ReplyDelete
  25. Lady, I just wanted to add that I agree that Rowe and Oxman are a total waste of time. I also don't get how Oxman is able to maintain a legal practice. It's offensive how he seems to seek out media attention, kinda' like Klein had been doing.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Katherine's complaint against AEG. Two web sources showing identical documents with some difference:

    Source 1: No filing date stamp and no tabloid water-mark. (Easier to read as a result.)
    http://x17online.com/MJ%20Complaint.pdf

    Source 2: Includes stamp showing date when complaint was filed. Also includes "Radar on line.com" water-mark.
    http://www.radaronline.com/sites/radaronline.com/files/Katherine%20Jackson%20vs%20AEG.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  27. @lady,

    I am glad to see your comment. I have not read the AEG contract. But my question is how this contract that is online is valid? What kind of parameter do we have to check its validity?

    Pardon me for my luck of understanding, but from what I heard before, Dr. Murray was hired by Michael not AEG. So why is that he is inserted in this contract that is floating online?

    ReplyDelete
  28. @SandyK,

    Your speculation on Sony sounds very reasonable based on organized mobs activities and what they are capable of doing.

    It also sounds so painful (if it holds water) for Michael to be put to this horrendous act to take his life.

    I hope one day forensic investigation will unravel all this. Who will initiate the investigation, I don’t know.

    ReplyDelete
  29. @Bonnie & everyone,

    I am sure you’ve heard about this seminar that was held in Los Angeles on September 15 that focused on Michael’s 2005, which include Mr. Tom M and other lawyers and judges.

    What was their main goal to talk about the trial? Is it something lawyers and judges do from time to time by selecting high profile court case for educational purpose or what?

    I also heard they are going to put the entire seminar on DVD for sale. Wow!!! Another money making business in the name of Michael.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Bonnie

    I'm sorry you had troublemakers on this blog and glad you fixed the problem.

    My first week at work was Mass Chaos!

    I'm doing okay but the line I work at is very unorganized and the orders keep changing all the time.

    So far....I Hate It!

    But God will direct my path so I'm taking it one day at a time.....actually One Hour At A Time!

    Thanks for asking.
    _____________________________________________
    @TRUTH

    Thanks for asking about my job.

    I missed all the chaos on this blog yet, went through another chaos at work.

    So I wasn't as Lucky as you thought I was.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Thanks SandyK!

    Several things on Katherine's complaint I found very interesting:

    "18. Defendants: DOES 1-100 are currently unknown to Plaintiffs at this time and Plaintiffs reserve the right to add them as defendants as their identity and culpability becomes known."

    WOW, amazing move!

    "20. Nominal Party: The ESTATE OF MICHAEL JACKSON..."

    Now, that may seem a strange move considering what we know about the administrators BUT, The Jacksons are not without a voice on estate matters. How many knew this:

    21/11/2009

    Michael Jackson's nephew Taj has been secretly invited onto the board of executors looking after the star's $1bn fortune.

    Tito's son Taj, 36, has been asked by administrators John McLain and John Branca to decide on how to distribute his cash.

    http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/610450/Taj-Jackson-in-charge-of-estate.html

    It always strikes me as stupidly funny whenever the word SECRET is splashed in the media...a short-lived "secret" at best!

    On a bizarre sidenote (interesting choice of wording):
    February 06, 2010, (Sawf News) - Dr. Conrad Murray's star defense witness in the involuntary manslaughter case against him for the death Michael Jackson will be Jackson himself!

    Murray's defense team plans to resurrect Michael from his grave, in a manner reminiscent of his thriller video, to defend their client. Even more bizarre, they also plan to call Michael's elder two children, Prince, 12, and Paris, 11, as defense witnesses.

    http://www.sawfnews.com/Gossip/62612.aspx

    ReplyDelete
  32. Dear Bonnie,

    Happy to see you back!
    I was reading a article about will iam and MJ music that they recorded together and he said that he thought it was direspectful to release it.

    http://www.contactmusic.com/news.nsf/story/william-condemns-new-jackson-album_1156325

    Will i am spent 2yrs with MJ recording new music, why not release it? Check out this article below and look whos in the picture!

    http://www.tmz.com/2010/06/16/barack-obama-los-angeles-lakers-boston-celtics-malia-sasha-michelle-jersey-fathers-day-gift/

    ReplyDelete
  33. Dear Bonnie,

    Glad to see you back! I sent you a post and it is MARVELOUS!

    ReplyDelete
  34. Ok...I too have a copy of Katherine's filing. However, I have also noted (so hence my correction, and my apology) that Joseph is NOWHERE directly on the list of Plaintiffs. But...there are two Attorney offices listed that of: Panish, Shea, and Boyle LLP and then there is the Law Offices of KC Maxwell. The official list of Plaintiffs include Katherine, Prince, Paris, and Blanket. This is strictly Katherine's suit on behalf of MJ3 so put the word out, Joseph's suit against AEG is still SEPARATE to Katherine's, and that means he still has the buffoon, Oxman running his legal show. Ugh...

    Now, I've done some digging about the legal teams involved for the Plaintiffs, and this is what I've found:

    Panish, Shea, and Boyle LLP: http://www.psandb.com/

    KC Maxwell: http://kcmaxlaw.com/index.html

    ReplyDelete
  35. Oh...if you want to rid yourselves of the watermark from Radar Online on the official copy of Katherine's complaint? Here you go: http://www.psandb.com/articles/mj-complaint.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  36. Truthbtold - You said: "Anschutz - He is a reclusive billionaire whose guiding force is religion. "A disciplined man who rises each day at 4.30am, he runs marathons and rarely drinks alcohol." He once declared that “family is first and everything else is second”. He supports family values in entertainment - that is a BIG plus about him for me. As of 2006, he had not given an interview since 1978. "He showed entrepreneurial flair aged 9 when he set up a drinks stand on roller skates to serve local students." LOL Reminds me of my kids serving lemonade out front to entice people to their yard sale."

    He still has not given an interview (and for THAT I say good for him.) As far as him being close to Bush . . . was he really? He's done some fundraising for the conservative side, but Michael has been with presidents from both sides. As a matter of fact, two republicans (Reagan and Bush) and one democrat (Clinton). Bush AT THE TIME was also pushing for family grass-roots legislation (but didn't go there) so I can see Anschutz hanging around him to get that type of legislation enacted or passed.

    I like Mr. Anschutz because the decisions he's made (in both business and politics and personal life) has been more for principle than profit. And if he can have both? Of course he's going to go for it. I think the oilwell fire story is probably what first dropped my jaw about him. That was awesome! This is the kind of ingenuity that they don't even encourage in schools anymore and that is sad.

    Also what you mentioned about Katherine's adding of defendants. I agree with you. The bridge is going to be full when it falls.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Mimi - I missed something . . . did you say SandyK suggested that Michael took his own life? I don't believe that for one moment. I am still adamant that Michael was NOT a drug addict and he was NOT suicidal. He had children and there is no way that is in his makeup.

    Lady - "Ok...I too have a copy of Katherine's filing. However, I have also noted (so hence my correction, and my apology) that Joseph is NOWHERE directly on the list of Plaintiffs. "

    No, he is listed on the contingent plaintiffs. I'll have to look at the page number/paragraph where I saw that, but I have to run to the store, dinner, Sunday, husband gets up at 4am type of deal today. Just trying to catch up on the comments here.

    Nita - Thank you lady! I may have already approved the post. I've only had to delete a couple and none of them were yours. ;o)

    ReplyDelete
  38. Oh Josie, sorry to hear you don't like your job. Hope it gets better! (⑆

    ReplyDelete
  39. @lady - Joe J. is listed on page 4, paragraph 9 as a "nominal party" in Katherine's complaint; also listed as a nominal party on page 4, paragraph 20 is the Estate of Michael Jackson; in both instances, it is stated "as may be required by California law".

    #mimi - the seminar held in LA on September 15 was a continuing education seminar sponsored by the Los Angeles County Bar Association. Atending attorneys (only for attorneys) paying the required fee, use these seminars for credits required by the Bar Association. It should have been a dispassionate event, like going to college, but where Michael is concerned, sadly, there is always going to be difference of opinion. The Assistant Prosecutor, Zonen, steadfastly maintains the same position he held five years ago, but, then, if he came to his senses, he would probably lose his job. Tom Sneddon's absence from this seminar speaks volumes. All the other attorney parties and Judge Melville, did participate. DVD's can be ordered in a few weeks from the Bar Association.

    @truth - your reference to the "Doe" allegations in the complaint is standard; it's to be used to bring in defendants when events are later discovered warranting them being included. If a complaint is drawn up without "Does", then there is no way a plaintiff can add them later. It's a terrible mistake for attorneys not to include the "Doe" provision.

    ReplyDelete
  40. @ Bonnie: You're right. I see it. #19. Joseph is listed as a "nominal party" and below him at #20 is the Estate.

    ReplyDelete
  41. @Truthbtold2all

    Thanks for the link on Murray's defense strategy


    The idea they are trying to get Murray off by showing footage of MJ where he appears to be under drugs, is Nuts!

    Even if MJ was slurring his words at a Disortation, the FACT that Murray had been giving MJ Propofol, should be Enough to convict Murray because Propofol in the HOME is Illegal!

    I do not believe MJ killed himself! He had his own children to love and raise.

    There is only 1 thing that MJ said that would make him commit Suicide and that is IF the world had NO CHILDREN in it.

    Well, not only does the world have children in it, but MJ had 3 of his own!

    I'm sure the Jackson's attorneys will get this footage about what MJ said about Sucide and clear this whole thing up.

    Another thing is the fact they want to use MJ kids to testify Against MJ! That's just SICK!

    Here is the link:

    http://www.sawfnews.com/Gossip/62612.aspx

    ReplyDelete
  42. @ Bonnie and Mimi,

    Yikes! Just to clarify, I don't believe that Michael took his own life or that he was an addict at the time of his death. I'm looking back at my comments to see where something I said might have been mis-interpreted. At any rate, if I gave that impression I want to extend my apologies. That's not what I meant....:-)

    ReplyDelete
  43. @Bonnie,

    Like you said, it's not in Michael's makeup to do something as drastic as suicide. His kids were his life and his reason for getting out of bed everyday. I genuinely believe that. He was scared of loosing them or being seperated from them. I remember an interview with Thomas Mesereau when he related an account of more than one occasion, 5 years ago during the trial, that Michael called him up very early in the morning, 3am or 4am, upset because he was afraid of losing his kids. They were everything to him.

    ReplyDelete
  44. @Bonnie,

    "Also what you mentioned about Katherine's adding of defendants. I agree with you. The bridge is going to be full when it falls."

    Ugh! This put a lump in my throat because it reminded me of a bridge accident Michael had years ago during a concert at the Munich Olympic Stadium in 1999. Warning, this is disturbing video.

    Video:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPIFLhR-BGA

    ReplyDelete
  45. I thought that this may make a bit of interesting reading for everyone. It's just me "thinking outside the box": https://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0BxaHBrGpwZvhOGRlMWE5MzItY2I3Zi00ZmM3LWE3MjMtOGUwZGNiYTEyYzM1&hl=en&authkey=CLqmy_wK

    Enjoy!

    ReplyDelete
  46. Bonnie – Oh sorry I did not mean to say SandyK suggested Michael took his own life. It was a wording error on my part. What I mean is if Sony used organized crime activities to kill Michael, its sounds so painful for him to be put through this terror and to finally kill him. That is what I was trying to say. I do believe too Michael is not a drug addict.

    ReplyDelete
  47. SandyK - You said: "There WAS a written agreement between Murray and AEG according to Katherine's complaint. Such a claim couldn't be formally made unless there is proof to back it up. There is a "paper" trail, so to speak, or written record of intent and Murray started to perform services per that intent. At the end of the day, this IS a contract."

    Yes, it IS a contract. Is is signed by anyone but Murray? Parties in a contract where only one of the parties signatures is present will be harder to argue.

    Has anyone seen any Live interviews or T.V. interviews about this since it broke, maybe on Youtube? (I have not). I am getting very suspicious of anything in print now.

    Mimi - "I am glad to see your comment. I have not read the AEG contract. But my question is how this contract that is online is valid? What kind of parameter do we have to check its validity?"

    I'm going to agree with you here only because there have been some questionable docs online. Something else bothers me though. How and why would a complaint for a lawsuit filed hours before make it online as a pdf? That kind of stuff REALLY makes me angry. Who's leaking this stuff out so quickly?

    ReplyDelete
  48. Mimi - My source said their would be no DVD. Keep our eyes open on that because I would like to see that too.

    JUne - "@lady - Joe J. is listed on page 4, paragraph 9 as a "nominal party" in Katherine's complaint; also listed as a nominal party on page 4, paragraph 20 is the Estate of Michael Jackson;" Thank you for posting that. I had a birthday date with my son today so thank you for getting to that question for me.

    Josie - "Another thing is the fact they want to use MJ kids to testify Against MJ! That's just SICK!

    Here is the link:

    http://www.sawfnews.com/Gossip/62612.aspx "

    Let's try and remember who we're dealing with before we go getting upset. This is the press. They have about as much integrity as a house of sand.

    SandyK - "At any rate, if I gave that impression I want to extend my apologies. That's not what I meant....:-) " I thought I might have read that wrong.

    SandyK - "Like you said, it's not in Michael's makeup to do something as drastic as suicide. His kids were his life and his reason for getting out of bed everyday." - This is also the reason I don't buy the "drug addict" garbage. He has three children, he's known for years that people were trying to kill him and he's going to willingly walk around in a cloud? No sir. You just wait and see what comes out of this thing.

    SandyK - "Ugh! This put a lump in my throat because it reminded me of a bridge accident Michael had years ago during a concert at the Munich Olympic Stadium in 1999." - That is what made me think of "bridge". You know, 1999 . . . I wonder, were they trying to kill him then?

    ReplyDelete
  49. Lady - "https://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0BxaHBrGpwZvhOGRlMWE5MzItY2I3Zi00ZmM3LWE3MjMtOGUwZGNiYTEyYzM1&hl=en&authkey=CLqmy_wK " - You have some very interesting research on this. It's really funny how your research finds exactly his stated feelings about touring.

    This is the curious thing about his whole relationship with AEG. Michael did sign a contract and he did it in January and he did it (according to reports and the time line I have) in the presence of Phillips, Anschutz himself, Tohme and Lewieki. Michael signed it knowing that his living expenses and children's tutors, etc. Now what I find is odd . . . the Mansion he was renting in Beverly Hills that AEG was supposedly paying the rent for - The CONTRACT for AEG had not even been signed yet until the end of January. So was AEG paying his expenses before then?

    "According to property records, the lavish and exuberantly decorated pile on N. Carolwood Drive is owned by Roxanne Guez who is (or was, we don't know) married to Hubert Guez, a somewhat controversial bizness man who made his millions manufacturing apparel in Mexico for all sorts of recognizable mass market brands. Mister Guez now serves as the CEO of a coterie of clothing brands including Ed Hardy and Christian Audiger." Source http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:rf0fjv4YvEcJ:realestalker.blogspot.com/2008/12/is-michael-jackson-on-move.html+Michael+jackson+moves+to+Beverly+hills+2008&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

    ReplyDelete
  50. @ Bonnie and SandyK,

    About that bridge that fell during the History Tour.

    Both of you have a good point here!

    I know accidents happen on tours all the time...

    BUT !!!!!!

    under the circumstances).................

    it is a Very Good Possibility that bridge fell

    ON PURPOSE!! WOW!

    I just never thought about it before.

    I wouldn't be surprised if they were trying to kill him back then.

    After all, this was AFTER the 1st Allegations.

    If he had died from that "accident" they would

    have stood a better chance of getting away with it.

    ReplyDelete
  51. I would imagine that the had him come to LA to sign the contract. But, I'm sure it was done in rather plush surroundings. You know...flaunt the money. Corporate mucky-mucks like to do that.

    In any case, I just completed and posted another astrological article, this time dealing with Katherine's filing against AEG. Until trial, I'm keeping my astro-mouth shut. Anyway, here it is: https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0BxaHBrGpwZvhNTU0ZDQ1N2EtN2ZmMi00ZjI3LWI4MjgtNGY2NWI5OTViMDdh&hl=en&authkey=CPDs47wG

    ReplyDelete
  52. @ June and everyone: I found where Joe's listed. Thanks anyway. :)

    @ Bonnie: It's amazing how astrology when used properly (rather than a means of "fortune-telling") can be an effective tool in research. Especially since we can no longer ask Michael, but believe me...his chart DOES talk when asked the proper question(s)!!! :)

    ReplyDelete
  53. New Blog and at the end, I have a request for all of you. I don't care how many of you do it, just asking for people to take up a prayer. (Lady, you know which one. :o))

    Really need your help with this and spread it around . . . just the prayer. You can copy and paste to emails or your facebook pages.

    Rowe Disingenuous at best...http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/09/more-on-leonard-rowe.html

    The link to it is on the bottom of that blog update.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Josie - I said that tongue-in-cheek. I don't think it would have killed him, but if you were trying to injure someone so they could no longer perform? So they would have to sell a catalog for example?

    Lady - I have NO CLUE about Astrology. So that can be your job :o) so if you were doing it IMPROPERLY, I wouldn't even know. I loved your dream by the way but it made me sad :o(((

    ReplyDelete
  55. Interesting Lady. I noticed a lot of 7s & 11s in that first chart.

    About Michael and the bridge falling...I too believe it could very well have been on purpose. I remember reading that he was upset with Ortega(?) for a long time about that. I wonder if that was true and what the implications are.

    Michael did appear to be struggling and in pain afterward. So sad. He was an amazing professional to finish the show...drilled into him from a young age though so it's no great surprise.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Bonnie,

    Wait a minute!

    If MJ didn't owe any money to the concert promoters or anyone, than how could they sue him for getting hurt or killed because that bridge fell?

    He didn't owe any money or take out any loan in 1999, did he?

    If he didn't owe any money, than the insurance would have covered any injury or death from an accident (bridge falling). Right?

    So if that's right, than the bridge falling was Really an Accident. No foul play involved.

    Right? Or am I missing something?

    ReplyDelete
  57. I think the family has investigated and found sufficient cause to file this lawsuit. I also believe the family has more people helping them behind the scenes. Randy said in his tweets, that Bonnie posted above, that there is more to come. It is a much bigger plan unfolding....

    ReplyDelete
  58. I hope the point and outcome of the plan is what I hope it is.

    ReplyDelete
  59. That's true. Worldwide (Also in my country) and in all kinds of news. They play something like "broken telephone" because in the end, the last to publish it, change the essence of the story. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  60. Truth,
    You never know in this situation, sometimes truth is stranger than fiction....

    ReplyDelete
  61. Congratulation for you site!Beautiful!
    Enter at Michael Jackson’s Official Blog for fans
    http://michael-jackson-fan-club.blogspot.com/
    and leave a link to your blog for sending people to this article.
    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.