Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Slipery Slope, Sony's Rope - Part 6

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Slipery Slope, Sony's Rope - Part 6


The harder they fight, the closer the truth is to hitting the light . . .





Slipery Slope, Sony's Rope - Part 6

Return-Path:
Received: from imr-db01.mx.aol.com ([unknown] [205.188.91.95]) by vms169133.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTP id <0l7o0076269ma739 vms169133.mailsrvcs.net=""> for bcox210@verizon.net; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:34:35 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from imo-da04.mx.aol.com (imo-da04.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.202]) by imr-db01.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o7OIYKj3004960        for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:34:20 -0400
Received: from SCaliforniagrl1@aol.com           by imo-da04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id 6.e66.2c3d90b (37686)       for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:34:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtprly-mb01.mx.aol.com (smtprly-mb01.mx.aol.com [64.12.207.148]) by cia-mb08.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMB082-5c5c4c7410a282; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:34:14 -0400
Received: from webmail-m094 (webmail-m094.sim.aol.com [64.12.102.44]) by smtprly-mb01.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYMB012-5c5c4c7410a282; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:34:10 -0400
Received: from 76.172.238.17 by webmail-m094.sysops.aol.com (64.12.102.44) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:34:10 -0400
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:34:10 -0400
From: "Stephanie Wilburn"
Subject: Re: Dr. Slavit
In-reply-to: <53dd54da7e954d2cb09a83592c7c6cb7>
X-Originating-IP: [205.188.91.95]
To:
Message-ID: <8cd11d213d94ccb-199c-f78 webmail-m094.sysops.aol.com="">
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 32447-STANDARD

Bonnie your not going to believe this but I saw the entire thing go down with Taaj! I was standing right there when Hulya was starting a fight with her! Then the cops made her go all the way down to the corner. We interviewed Taaj right after that happened, and she did an amazing job, we also asked her why the cops made her move. We got that answer on camera. The "justoce for MJ" girls including Hulya were bragging about getting their post on TMZ and how wide that post went. They are awful people, we didnt interview any of them. We did interview Taaj and a few of her friends and they all did amazing. We will definitely be including them in this documentary! Do you really think it was a set up? it was so odd because the cops told Taaj she had to go down to the corner, we went down with her exactly where the cops told us to stand, and then they came up and were trying to stop/interrupt our interview. I said to them "we are standing right where you told us to stand!" then I said they were being total ass holes to our camera guys, they saw me glaring at them and heard what I said and they backed off. There was no reason for them to be hovering when we stood exactly where they told us to be. It was so weird. If you speak with Taaj tell her I said hi and thank you for all of her help yesterday.

Also I would LOVE to read your post, please send it over! I am nursing a stomach flu right now, I think I got food poisoning last night, so I am laying around taking it easy today. Yesterday was very intense! 

(She knows these girls by name? Wow!  Stomach flu. Guess that’s what happens when you try to wash down your salad with propofol.  Anyway we know the Taaj-Hulya story . . . another Sony-assisted Fan Break up, so moving on….)


(I send another blog update to Stephanie Wilburn)

-----Original Message-----
From: Bonnie Cox
To: scaliforniagrl1@aol.com
Sent: Thu, Sep 2, 2010 10:29 pm
Subject: Debunking lies of Sony and Michael partnership
Blog update - Sony blogger strikes again . . . think it may be Charles Thomson


Bonnie L. Cox


And she replies:

Return-Path:
Received: from imr-ma03.mx.aol.com ([unknown] [64.12.206.41]) by vms169127.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTP id <0l85004vyptzgyxk vms169127.mailsrvcs.net=""> for bcox210@verizon.net; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:56:24 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from imo-da04.mx.aol.com (imo-da04.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.202]) by imr-ma03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o835uKR6029416      for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:56:20 -0400
Received: from SCaliforniagrl1@aol.com           by imo-da04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id 6.cee.7b31d8fb (43891)     for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:56:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtprly-dd03.mx.aol.com (smtprly-dd03.mx.aol.com [205.188.84.131]) by cia-dc05.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILCIADC054-d40b4c808dfa31c; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:56:15 -0400
Received: from webmail-d072 (webmail-d072.sim.aol.com [205.188.167.106]) by smtprly-dd03.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDD037-d40b4c808dfa31c; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:56:10 -0400
Received: from 76.90.141.31 by webmail-d072.sysops.aol.com (205.188.167.106) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:56:10 -0400
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:56:10 -0400
From: "Stephanie Wilburn"
Subject: Re: Debunking lies of Sony and Michael partnership
In-reply-to: <79131df74e014c66994ae1ed1cb3f66f>
X-Originating-IP: [64.12.206.41]
To:
Message-ID: <8cd1943d5e46bb7-1c6c-9a62 webmail-d072.sysops.aol.com="">
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 32447-STANDARD

Bonnie you are doing SUCH  a good job on this blog! I was so excited to hear that you may be still interested in coming down to LA for an interview? Let me know if you can as we would LOVE for you to be a part of it! I have been so busy with this project because it seems like there is always more and more work to be done! We interviewed Tom Mesereau yesterday, it turns out his assistant who was killed Mrs. Wilborn, had NOTHING to do with MJ thank god!
Keep these posts coming and I will speak with you soon!!
Steph

(I am sending a copy of this to Mr. Tom Mesereau too, Stephanie, since you mentioned interviewing him for integrity sake; he should know what is going on.)


(Now we get to the interesting stuff…. Background laid out for you.  Little did I know that the Sammy Incident was going to blow this thing wide open.  It started actually with Taaj asking me a couple of weeks ago to apologize to Randy Jackson for her over her nasty twitters to him for Transitional Lawsuit.  I was taken aback because she had told me and had always told me that she was “in” with the Jackson family and working with the Jackson family over the last several months.  I was a good piece of information for her , wasn’t I Taaj?)



-----Original Message-----
From: Bonnie Cox
To: scaliforniagrl1@aol.com
Sent: Sat, Sep 4, 2010 12:50 am
Subject: This is the kind of garbage
That REALLY gets to me!

Sammy DeGosson, inciting and encouraging this MOB MENTALITY against MICHAEL'S OWN BROTHER?

Stephanie, can you contact the family and tell them this is going on?  Or even Tom Mesereau?

Here is the thread from Sammy's facebook page:  This is turning into another 2005 Trial!  I have since removed myself from both Sam Degosson's page and Friends of Karen's Facebook pages:

Samantha De Gosson  Dr. Thome Thome was once married to Randy Phillip's sister, Janet Phillips. Jermaine's wife is Thome Thome's cousin. The more you research the links between all parties involved in his murder, the more sickening and apparent it becomes.

#
Abby Rangel, Katja Veritas Tini, Ceci Savoré and 57 others like this.
#

    *
      Yvonne Püschel you're so right sam, it's shocking! x
      Thursday at 12:35pm · LikeUnlike
    *
      Janet Imane yeah it does...OMG.....:'(
      Thursday at 12:36pm · LikeUnlike
    *
      Christy Miller-Privt I know, right? very disturbing to think about
      Thursday at 12:36pm · LikeUnlike
    *
      Maria Malakasi u are right..its becoming mafia war from one day to another..xxx
      Thursday at 12:36pm · LikeUnlike
    *
      Diane Hotchkiss ok i am just going tospeak my mind here, and i know i may be way off, but my heart is telling me differant! i really think jermaine has his hands on his brothers death! and your right sammy its very sicken!
      Thursday at 12:37pm · LikeUnlike

( broke off the thread I copied because it is so long, but you all have see this already)


(Stephanie’s Reply.  Remember this reply, because she contradicts it further down.  You know these people are not too bright.  I would Hope that Sony could afford better plants, but after paying so much for Michael’s unreleased songs, they are probably scraping bottom of the barrel)

Return-Path:
Received: from imr-ma02.mx.aol.com ([unknown] [64.12.206.40]) by vms169123.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTP id <0l88006g3al3c9qn vms169123.mailsrvcs.net=""> for bcox210@verizon.net; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 10:19:52 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from imo-da02.mx.aol.com (imo-da02.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.200]) by imr-ma02.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o84FJkkv000495        for ; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 11:19:46 -0400
Received: from SCaliforniagrl1@aol.com           by imo-da02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id 6.ebc.23ff4d1 (43890)        for ; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 11:19:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtprly-dc01.mx.aol.com (smtprly-dc01.mx.aol.com [205.188.170.1]) by cia-dc05.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILCIADC053-d1c64c82638811c; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 11:19:40 -0400
Received: from webmail-m078 (webmail-m078.sim.aol.com [64.12.141.36]) by smtprly-dc01.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDC017-d1c64c82638811c; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 11:19:36 -0400
Received: from 76.172.238.17 by webmail-m078.sysops.aol.com (64.12.141.36) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Sat, 04 Sep 2010 11:19:36 -0400
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 11:19:36 -0400
From: "Stephanie Wilburn"
Subject: Re: This is the kind of garbage
In-reply-to: <22b7029da9fe4fe9939c78cb34348ee3>
X-Originating-IP: [64.12.206.40]
To:
Message-ID: <8cd1a5bb86b79ef-ff0-a565 webmail-m078.sysops.aol.com="">
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 32447-STANDARD

Hi Bonnie!
To be honest she is 100% correct. Jermain is NOT to be trusted and he is friends with Tohme, Randy Phillips, etc. He never got over the fact that MJ was more of a success than he was, and he was always jealous of him. He was the only one who wanted MJ buried at Neverland because it would bring extreme profit for Tohme/Colony Capital, thus himself. He also had kids with Tito's wife, who had already had children with Tito. Jermain stole her and she left Tito. He isnt a very good guy. He also tried to start up that Vienna concert for MJ with his wife Halima, the $ raised would go to their private company, NOT to a charity as MJ would have preferred. 
Samantha is 100% right on this one! I've known it for quite awhile!

(first of all, Branca would earn in a Neverland Burial over MJ’s trademarks, not Colony, who only owned the land.  Colony would not even be able to have Michael there without the Estate’s permission and family).


(Now the pieces of THIS ONE start coming together!  See my very angry email to Stephanie after the three day proliferation of hatred toward me for something QUITE DISPROPORTIONATE.  Same thing happened when I outed Charles Thomson.  By  The way Charles, Aphrodite is going to be getting a copy of my blogs too.  Oops!!! Did I already send that!)

-----Original Message-----
From: Bonnie Cox
To: scaliforniagrl1@aol.com
Sent: Tue, Sep 7, 2010 4:22 am
Subject: Taaj and Sam
Stephanie Wilburn,

I know you received my reply regarding Samantha along with a second decline to be interviewed.

I don't know what is going on, but Saturday night I receive a phone call from Taaj Malik.

She called me for information on why I deleted myself from Friends of Karen and Samantha's page.  At the time I told
her that it was nothing serious, I just disagreed with the way people were getting treated when asking certain questions, 
the issue with blaming Tohme and Jermaine and it bothered me to the point where I felt it best to leave.

During the phone call Taaj informed me (after I told her about my misgivings about Samantha's page) that she and
Sammy were starting their own group and getting rid of Eddie Jones.  She said they were going to get "back in with the
Jackson Family".  (she was never "in".  She asked ME to apologize to Randy Jackson FOR HER for her twitters!)

She then told me that "friends" were treating her to a few days in Vegas and that she and Sammy were doing a
documentary and possibly a weekly T.V. show.

I already know that the story with Sammy and Michael is a fraud, or at least her photo with Michael is. 
Before Taaj hung up with me, she wanted to know if I had any more information about Michael being "alive". 
I told her I put out all information I dig up and people are free to think what they want.  I knew she was "fishing".

Since I do not see how a fraud that goes to the extent of gloating on her page about being close to Michael and
meeting his children with only one photo shopped picture of her an Michael together could POSSIBLY help the Jackson
family, It can ONLY then be harmful.  It already has been to Michael's fans. 

I have a copy of your resume that was posted online.  I am calling TMZ today to see if you work there.

1/2 Century Film Productions and "Half Century Film Productions" does not exist.  I knew this before I talked
to you on the phone which is why I did  search on your number.  That lead me to your resume online.

I am then putting up another blog with Taaj and Sammy's little plan and including the date of this supposed documentary and
copies of your emails WITH  headers, unless you have a damned good reason I should not.

I am sick of watching fans getting played and laying into each other over frauds like Sammy.  This is NOT Michael! And this has NOTHING to do with Justice for him!

Karen could have exposed the people who were after Michael BACK WHEN THIS WAS GOING ON in 2005!  Nobody did anything!   Now they want to blame AEG who was nowhere near in the picture back when this conspiracy began!

Sony is a big company.  They can recommend lots of clients and steer them certain people's way.  AEG not so big.

I followed the money . . . it's not in AEG's pocket it is in Branca's and Sony's!

The documentary is going to get some early marketing for free unless you have a good reason not to put this up.  I need an explanation please.

Thank you,

Bonnie L. Cox


(Her reply the very next day, and take note of the contradiction!  Now she has nothing to do with Taaj and Samantha DeGosson?)

Return-Path:
Received: from imr-da02.mx.aol.com ([unknown] [205.188.105.144]) by vms169129.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTP id <0l8d00boszpm78m6 vms169129.mailsrvcs.net=""> for bcox210@verizon.net; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:10:34 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from imo-da01.mx.aol.com (imo-da01.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.199]) by imr-da02.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o87HAKZA004826     for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:10:20 -0400
Received: from SCaliforniagrl1@aol.com           by imo-da01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id 6.e2a.634f484 (45279)        for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:10:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtprly-db01.mx.aol.com (smtprly-db01.mx.aol.com [205.188.249.152]) by cia-mc04.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMC041-5bc24c8671ee243; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:10:14 -0400
Received: from webmail-d014 (webmail-d014.sim.aol.com [205.188.181.33]) by smtprly-db01.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDB011-5bc24c8671ee243; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:10:06 -0400
Received: from 76.90.141.31 by webmail-d014.sysops.aol.com (205.188.181.33) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:10:06 -0400
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:10:06 -0400
From: "Stephanie Wilburn"
Subject: Re: Taaj and Sam
In-reply-to: <118f1a13ebdb4df99cd29e10d8d3ebe7>
X-Originating-IP: [205.188.105.144]
To:
Message-ID: <8cd1cc6a75e0e3d-b4c-be1 webmail-d014.sysops.aol.com="">
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 32644-STANDARD

What? Why would you do that to me? I have done NOTHING wrong to you, and I really am asking you not to do this. I have no idea what is going on with Sam and Taaj, I only just met them at the courthouse and I was trying to interview them to help with this doc. I saw your blog and thought that you would be an good person to interview as well. I understand you confusion, this doc is being made to HELP not to hurt ANYONE. I have no affiliation with Samantha and Taaj, I just found their "TINT" site online and that was it. Please lets just calm down and move on from this, I and my crew are not trying to hurt anyone and I no longer work at TMZ as of Feb 2010.

I am sorry for ever contacting you in the first place, i am only trying to do a positive thing. I haven't said or done anything offensive to you. I have spent hours on the phone talking to you about the site and I do not understand why you would possibly do this to me. Please lets just drop this and move on.
Steph 

(She spent an hour and a half on the phone, the ONLY time I talked to her.  Why do I do this?  Because she lied to me. She is not doing a good thing for Michael, she is doing a good thing for Sony via John Branca, via MICHAEL JACKSON’S ESTATE!)

Michael’s children are going to be stolen from (this is already happening).

The MONEY TRAIL WE ARE FOLLOWING FOLKES is going right to John Branca and Sony via the HOSTAGES MJACK, SONY/ATV AND MICHAEL’S MASTERS. 

Samantha was put in place to DELIBERATELY SPLINTER THE FAN BASE.  And she has been very effective!  SAMANTHA HAS BEEN PUT IN PLACE to further take attention off of Branca and bulldoze directly toward AEG.

Notice whenever I invoke the name of Sony or Branca in ANY OF MY BLOG UPDATES, I am bombarded with hate by specific bloggers.  Whenever I suggest that AEG, Colony, Tohme, Phillips, Anschutz or Barrack were only trying t o HELP MICHAEL BY HIDING ASSETS AND PROVIDING AN ESCAPE, I am attacked beyond belief!  When I pick on AEG . . . I can hear crickets!

This is kind of like the treatment the PRESS gave to MICHAEL during his whole adult life!  Only now AEG is getting it full force!  We are helping them just like some of us helped them do what they did to Michael by INNACTION ALONE!

Karen Faye, I cannot email you but I would like to know why you would align yourself with someone like Sammy, knowing full well she was a fake?

I want to know why you would gun for AEG instead of the very people who put Michael in handcuffs and KILLED HIS SPIRIT as you stated in your article.  YOU KNOW WHO DID IT BACK THEN?  WHY THE SILENCE?

And now you are going to let an innocent company take the fall for something SONY HAD BEEN DOING TO MICHAEL SINCE THE EARLY 1990’s?

I AM ASKING YOU!  We TRUSTED YOU!  Please answer!!!!

This documentary is supposed to be aired, according to Stephanie, IN THEATERS on JUNE 25, 2011!

Are you going to sit there and let SONY PROFIT AGAIN EVERY YEAR ON THE DAY OF HIS DEATH FOR THE NEXT 7 YEARS?

KAREN . . . WHO DO YOU WORK FOR?  WHO DOES SAMMY WORK FOR?  WHO DOES STEPHANIE WILBURN WORK FOR???

SONY – WE KNOW, OKAY?   WE KNOW!

MJANDJUSTICE4SOME, Charlie Thomson, J. Randy Taraborrelli, Samantha Degosson and her phony group!

Roger Friedman, John Branca, John McClain, Howard Weitzman, Evan Chandler, Janet Arvizo (who’s boys go to a nice, posh military school in Georgia . .  how did a  welfare fraud mom manage to afford that?

How did Evan afford HIS lifestyle?  He only got 1.5 million from Michael!  That’ wasn’t enough for all his surgeries, his medical care and that fancy million dollar condo for the last 15 years!  A loose cannon you had to keep quiet?  Peter Lopez wouldn’t talk!  Bruce Ayers to keep Klein quiet or to scare him into proliferating the drug stories before you pulled him off the market?

Sony, you can intice as many people as you want to hate me.  YOU WILL NOT SHUT ME UP! 

The more I am abused, the closer to the truth I have been throughout all this!

Taaj?  No phone calls for information?  Did someone give you an idea I just may be onto you?  Took me a while . . . I was a little thick, but I still kept notes.  You didn’t get mad at me when you wanted me to wait to publish a blog until you tried to peddle things as your idea.  Your’ little show with Hulya over the last few months did A GREAT JOB of further splintering the fan base.  Branca will be proud.  Oh and your long weekend on the town in Vegas . . . Joe Jackson paid for this with his paltry allowance that Katherine gives him?  He doesn’t have the money for all that, hotels, meals, shows . . . who paid for that, Taaj?

Well, I better close before someone accuses me of being jealous while completely disregarding the fact that I had an opportunity to be a traitor to Michael, but turned down her offer . . . TWICE . . . That MY FACEBOOK PAGE has not been taken down and that MY BLOG is still up and I am STILL not earning a doggone thing for any of this.

Karen Faye, I am seriously giving you the benefit of a doubt.  I know Sony could make sure you have a REALLY HARD TIME getting work considering all the musicians and actors that work for (get stolen from) Sony.  You just remember THIS FACE and tell yourself if it is worth it? 

Deflecting blame to AEG is not going to ease your pain . . . only possibly grow your bank account.  And you know Michael is watching.



Michael's Trial



Deflecting blame to AEG is not going to ease your pain . . . only possibly grow your bank account. And you know Michael is watching.


________________________________________________________________________

I have no allegiance to any of these people mentioned in this blog. I owe them nothing. Neither do you. Michael is the one who was hurt, persecuted and murdered! His Children are the ones being stolen from. Michael is the one who faced world scorn because of what these people did to him! Those who called themselves his friend showed up at the courthouse (some of them). Who spoke out on what was really going on??? NONE OF THEM!!! Not one of these people spoke up! Tom Mesereau, his attorney, Dick Gregory maybe, Michael SCREAMED IT and nobody, not his make up artist, not his costumer, not his childhood actor friends, not his fellow musicians . . . NONE OF THEM!!! Not one would stick their neck out and tell people what was really going on, so for four years when they could have SAVED HIS LIFE and made the public aware, they stuck their heads in the ground!


Now they want to put up blogs and web sites testifying their undying devotion while giving false witness against a company that really has no power to do anything other than what they have already done . . . remain silent and pray and hope that THIS TIME Justice will not let them down as it Did Michael Joe Jackson!

God help you if you cannot step up now.

I need a few days break after this one because I NEED TO REMEMBER HOW TO FORGIVE!!!




142 comments:

  1. Dear Bonnie,
    MJ sues Motown

    Last Updated: Tuesday, 13 May, 2003, 08:16 GMT 09:16 UK

    Email this to a friend Printable version

    Jackson sues Motown

    By Duncan Bartlett
    BBC News



    Jackson's musical career has been overshadowed by his private life
    Michael Jackson is suing Motown Records for money he says he is owed for classic Jackson Five songs.
    He filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles alleging he has not been paid royalties due for the music.

    Jackson also claims his music has been used in television adverts without his consent.

    Motown Records was the best known soul music label in the US when Jackson and his brothers recorded a string of hits for it in the late 1960s and early 1970s, including Never Can Say Goodbye, I Want You Back and I'll Be There.

    But the Jackson Five left Motown in 1976 to sign for Sony under the name The Jacksons following severe rows, which were only settled in an 1980 agreement.

    Jackson now wants the this settlement annulled by the Los Angeles Superior Court.

    The lawsuit alleges that as part of the agreement Jackson forfeited any royalties on Jackson Five and solo material released before the record company split.

    But Jackson contends Motown was to pay royalties for previously unreleased material and songs re-released on best-of compilations.
    The Jackson Five were formed by their father Joe

    Jackson alleges he has not been paid "a single dollar in royalties".

    His lawyers are suing Motown's new owner Universal Music for unpaid royalties, as well as punitive damages which could run into millions of dollars.

    Furthermore, Jackson is demanding the return of "all master recordings and musical compositions made and/or composed by Jackson" during his record contract with Motown.

    Universal Music has refused to comment.

    This lawsuit comes almost a year after Jackson sued his current record label, Sony, and its then chief executive Tommy Mottola, for what he described as racist business practices, a charge the company rejected as absurd.

    Michael Jackson's last album for Sony, Invincible, cost a reported $30m (£18.6m) to produce but sold a modest two million copies.

    In February, Jackson was ordered to pay $5.3m (£3.3m) to a concert promoter after pulling out of two Millennium Eve concerts.

    After several bizarre court appearances in which the star compared himself to Walt Disney because he could not deal with administrative issues, a judge in Los Angeles ruled in favour of promoter Marcel Avram.





    Email this to a friend Printable version

    JACKSON DOCUMENTARY ROW


    JACKSON IN FOCUS

    Growing pains
    The ups and downs of a superstar's turbulent 30-year career


    LATEST STORIES
    Jackson hits back on TV
    Courtroom truce
    Jackson seeks injunction
    Media frenzy in California


    JACKSON'S RESPONSE
    Mixed opinions from viewers
    Bashir 'lavished praise'
    'Betrayal' footage released
    UK readers' views


    THE ORIGINAL PROGRAMME
    Divided reaction in US
    'My son can stay with Jackson'
    Interview 'boosts sales'
    Charities condemn Jackson
    14m watch documentary




    RELATED INTERNET LINKS:
    Michael Jackson
    Universal Music
    The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


    TOP ENTERTAINMENT STORIES
    U2 reschedule US and Canada dates

    Cheryl 'on the mend' says Simon Cowell

    Zsa Zsa Gabor taken to hospital

    | News feeds



    PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
    E-mail news Mobiles Alerts News feeds Podcasts News Front Page |

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Bonnie,
    Last Updated: Tuesday, 3 June, 2003, 08:17 GMT 09:17 UK

    E-mail this to a friend Printable version

    Judge may dismiss Jackson case


    Jackson is on the verge of bankruptcy, according to the lawsuit
    A judge has said she will consider throwing out a lawsuit against Michael Jackson by a former financial advisor who says the singer owes him $12m (£7.3m).
    Myung-Ho Lee and his firm Union Finance and Investment Corp are suing Jackson for breach of contract and fraud.

    They said he has failed to pay their bills - while at the same time squandering his fortune on a series of "charlatans, hucksters, sycophants and swindlers".

    Jackson's lawyers say Mr Lee was not a licensed financial advisor in California and so could not have signed a valid contract with Jackson.

    Mr Lee's lawyers insist the contract is valid under an exception in Californian law for advisors who do not maintain a place of business in the state.

    Jackson - once said to have been worth £350m - has counter-sued, alleging that Mr Lee stole millions from him.

    According to Mr Lee's lawsuit, Jackson is on the verge of bankruptcy.

    In papers filed at Los Angeles Superior Court, the singer is characterised as a "ticking financial time bomb waiting to explode at any moment".

    Judge Andria Richey, who is due to rule on the case, is also considering requests from news organisations to televise the case if it goes forward as scheduled on 18 June.

    Jackson's lawyer, Zia Modabber, urged the judge to ban cameras - citing massive media interest during a previous testimony by the singer at an earlier case in November.





    E-mail this to a friend Printable version

    SEE ALSO:
    Jackson 'close to bankruptcy'
    28 May 03 | Entertainment
    Jackson loses $5m court case
    14 Mar 03 | Entertainment
    Jackson sues Motown
    13 May 03 | Entertainment
    Jackson's growing pains
    28 Feb 03 | Entertainment



    RELATED INTERNET LINKS:
    Michael Jackson
    Los Angeles Superior Court
    The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites


    TOP ENTERTAINMENT STORIES
    U2 reschedule US and Canada dates

    Cheryl 'on the mend' says Simon Cowell

    Zsa Zsa Gabor taken to hospital

    | News feeds



    PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
    E-mail news Mobiles Alerts News feeds Podcasts News Front Page | Africa | Americas | Asia-Pacific | Europe | Middle East | South Asia
    UK | Business | Entertainment | Science/Nature | Technology | Health
    Have Your Say | In Pictures | Week at a Glance | Country Profiles | In Depth | Programmes

    ReplyDelete
  3. DMichael Jackson sues former accountants
    December 26, 2006 Subscribe to: RSS, Email

    Michael Jackson is suing his former accountants, claiming they withdrew $2.5 million a year from his bank accounts but did not properly pay his bills, informs Reuters.

    The lawsuit by Michael Jackson and MJJ Productions Inc. was filed Thursday in Los Angeles Superior Court against Bernstein, Fox, Whitman, Goldman & Sloan, alleging negligence and breach of fiduciary duty.

    The lawsuit asks for unspecified damages and for an accounting of money the defendants received for services.

    Michael Jackson hired the Los Angeles-based firm in 2003 for bookkeeping, opening bank accounts and filing personal, corporate and real estate taxes, the lawsuit stated.

    The accountants also did not communicate directly with Michael Jackson or keep him apprised of his financial affairs, according to the lawsuit.










    Tags : Michael, Jackson
    | Bookmark or Share

    
    Comments Latest News Top News Related News Michael Jackson’s kids accept lifetime achievement Grammy
    Michael Jackson ordered to pay legal fees
    Michael Jackson scouts Maryland vacation homes
    Michael Jackson memorabilia dispute continues
    Michael Jackson settles $48M lawsuit
    Money talks and Jackson to Jackson
    Muse slam George Michael's Wembley gig
    George Michael may bid £50m for Hirst skull
    George Michael opens new Wembley Stadium
    Singer George Michael avoids jail term

    Britney Spears takes home the big prize for pussy!
    Christina Aguilera reveals about naked plans
    Images: Topless Britney Spears
    Britney Spears brings new nude fashion
    Beyonce and Shakira want duet
    Christina Aguilera amazed by her bust
    Lindsay Lohan and Paris Hilton bust up again
    Gwen Stefani releases The Great Escape
    Brit's second with the same name initials as first
    Helena Paparizou: MY NUMBER ONE Lyrics



    Menu
    Artists
    Lyrics
    NewsTop viewed artists
    Avril Lavigne
    Ozzy Osbourne
    T-Pain
    Mariah Carey
    Kenny Chesney
    Fabrizzio Faniello
    Black Eyed Peas
    ShakiraTop stories
    Jay-Z responds to devil-worship claims
    Christina Aguilera reveals about naked plans
    Dan Balan is Chica Bomb video
    Images: Topless Britney Spears
    Pink is almost naked at Grammys performance - video
    Kesha pranks owl city on performance
    Lady Gaga: Grammys performance 2010 video
    Ke$ha Blah Blah Blahs with 3OH!3 Top Video
    Michael Jackson music video clips
    Susan Boyle performs Memory for Britain`s Got Talent
    Susan Boyle singing in 1995
    Alexander Rybak wins Eurovision-2009 for Norway
    Hollie Steel Wows Judges on Britain`s Got Talent
    Opinion Poll
    Moldova: Do you approve or disapprove of the way Alliance for European Integration is handling its job as governing coalition?
    Approve
    Disapprove





    Total votes : 315
    Archive



    ear Bonnie,
    I know this is alot of information and i know you are very tired but i thought you might be interested in all the people who was screwing MJ over.

    ReplyDelete
  4. OMG...I am crying. It's like the old adage: "With friends like that...who needs enemies?" It's shameful and disgusting. If I never buy one more CD from any music artist THIS is the reason why. Sony may indeed be as crooked as the day is long, but in all fairness how many OTHER labels are just as wicked and guilty of the same crime(s) even if it's to a lesser degree than the one regarding Michael? It makes me sick. Gollywood can have their tinsel and glitz. I'll keep my hard earned cash and use it on other things from here on.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bonnie congratulations on an excellent blog!!!!

    I am still trying to digest it all. Thank you for putting it together in the manner that you did. I had all this meshed into my head trying to sort through it.
    What it comes down to as I stated on a prevous thread: vengance, power, money and greed. How sad it is!!!! Its not over and I believe more will be revealed. Enron doesn't have nothing on this.

    Truth Is Freedom!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Bonnie,

    I haven't had a chance to read everything, just skimming at this point and you're definitely getting deep in the weeds with this part of the story. Fascinating stuff. If this was a novel it would be a page turner for sure!

    I do have a concern though (I know, I've been having concerns alot lately, forgive me for that...:-), with the depth of research that you're doing and your obvious persistance it's clearly getting people's attention. The TMZ plant, or whoever that individual is, would give me pause, and clearly you feel the same. BTW, excellent background checking. It's not clear what that person's agenda is at this point although someone else had mentioned that their probably on a "fishing" expedition. It's good that you've asked alot of questions and have been cautious. Don't stop being cautious!!

    Please don't be alarmed by this suggestion, but I would STRONGLY suggest that you get legal advice at this point as you move forward so you don't get caught up in someone elses "agenda." So far so good at this point, you're obviously a smart lady, but it never hurts to be too safe.

    Sorry to go back to the controversial blog from the other day but this has been weighing heavily on me, there were still some comments about Karen that made cringe. She has said with in the last 24 hours that she has no FB account and doesn't contribute to anyone else's FB. You had made some references to "Jones Town" as a result of thinking she was using the phrase "My Truth." She didn't say this and is not involved with FOK. Along with the apology that you already issued about the funeral statement (that spoke well of your character), I hope you include one regarding that statement too. Of course this is not about popularity contests, it's about doing the right thing. Again, this is just a suggestion.

    Best wishes!!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. @ Bonnie: Stephanie's account here is WRONG-O!!! "Jermain is NOT to be trusted and he is friends with Tohme, Randy Phillips, etc. He never got over the fact that MJ was more of a success than he was, and he was always jealous of him. He was the only one who wanted MJ buried at Neverland because it would bring extreme profit for Tohme/Colony Capital, thus himself. He also had kids with Tito's wife, who had already had children with Tito. Jermain stole her and she left Tito. He isnt a very good guy."

    Jermaine did not steal Tito's wife. Tito and his wife DeeDee eventually divorced, and his wife had been murdered if memory serves years later. According to the actual account it was RANDY'S wife, Alejandra, now the very same ex Wife who is raising a hissyfit about getting kicked out of Havenhurst and put into one of MJ's condos via the Estate, to lessen the burden on Katherine due to the whole stun gun incident involving Jaafar Jackson and then Social Services getting involved.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Here's the link regarding DeeDee (Delores') death: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1355/is_3_95/ai_54724882/

    Here's a link regarding Alejandra Jackson: http://askville.amazon.com/Alejandra-Oaziaza-involved-Jermaine-Randy-Jackson/AnswerViewer.do?requestId=54717040

    ReplyDelete
  9. That Stephanie certainly didn't do her research very well...

    ReplyDelete
  10. Nita, this is a good find. Guess who bought the Motown catalog of songs? Bandier! and this lawsuit - "Myung-Ho Lee and his firm Union Finance and Investment Corp are suing Jackson for breach of contract and fraud. " Will be covered in a future blog update. there were many such lawsuits. Some were attempts to drive Michael to bankruptcy but this was actually discovered by Michael's attorneys DURING THE TRIAL IN 2005. These newer lawsuits are something else. Stay tuned.

    {{{{{{{ladyaquarius1962}}}}}}} I know, I know! And I with you will NEVER buy a Sony product. BTW, I was going to purchase a replacement battery for the remote door lock for my car. When I saw it said "Sony" I looked at the lady behind the counter (who was showing me how to put it in) and threw the battery in the garbage. The looks she gave me! I said to her, "Sony Kills" and walked out.

    I will open the door with my key from now on, the old fashioned way. And it felt GOOD!!!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Bonnie,
    I am so sorry that your friend beytayed you.

    That must hurt like Hell.

    I admire your courage and tinacity.

    The fact that you will NOT SHUT UP is Awesome to me.

    Proves you are a Warrior just like Michael was!

    I am Impressed Beyond Words!

    ReplyDelete
  12. SAndyK - Thank you for your suggestions. Yes, I know this is tough, and I know people were going to have a hard time with it. I expected the attacks. I thank my God I am not compelled to go and read them all! I have had offer of legal help should I need it so I am good there. And I will take your advice:

    On Karen, that remark was directed really at both she and Samantha. Karen no longer has her facebook page, but she does have a blog and this was also said on her blog, (her quote was "My Truth". I almost thought she was being dramatic or purposely trying to sound like a mystic). I was also told that "I have apologized enough". Should Karen contact me and feels it is worth her time to explain where she was coming from and I find that I am wrong, I will have no problem at all putting in a retraction or an apology.

    There is always a risk of being wrong when investigating things and I have been wrong on occasion. I don't mind admitting it because it helps clear the air, saves time and helps us to move on to the next purpose.

    Thank you again Sandy :o)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Bonnie,

    SHOUT IT FROM THE ROOF TOPS!

    If the Law doesn't give Justice to Michael, I

    want you to know.....YOU JUST DID!

    THE WHOLE WORLD NOW KNOWS THE TRUTH!

    And THE WHOLE WORLD OWES YOU A HEARTY.......

    THANK YOU!!

    I'm sure Michael is looking down and you with a Big Smile on his Face!

    ReplyDelete
  14. ladyaquarius1962 - You're right and I completely missed that! Thank you! I will put that in the blog in bold with your name next to it. Thank you for pointing that out. Amateur??? (her, not you).

    Josie - I do share a trait with Michael but I don't know if it is THAT one. I get really uncomfortable with praise or compliments. We're not supposed to have it on earth (constructive encouragement is okay). I know everyone here not only contributes with their discussion but all of you give ideas on what to look into sometimes by just disagreeing with me (Like lady finding that video with Karen at the funeral when none of my two vids showed her). Josie keeps everyone motivated . . . that is your gift.

    As far as my friend betraying me . . . I am going to say at this point that she really does not know what she is getting into. I believe she started with good intentions and is also a victim of the battles started by certain plants. But the trust is gone and that is a shame.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Bonnie,

    I'm glad to hear that you have legal advisors waiting in the wings, should you need them.

    This could get Ugly. (Legally Speaking)

    ReplyDelete
  16. Well, one thing has clearly been resolved through all of this, Bonnie. Remember how I'd said that "I don't want to deal with the smoke...I want to deal with the fire.", well...the smoke has cleared. Sony and Branca, et. al are the guilty parties. No one else. No more smoke. Now it's time to address the fire...

    ReplyDelete
  17. Oh my God Bonnie, I am so sad and depressed. I don’t know what to say. I am so sorry Bonnie, God is looking out for you. What a shame of all these people in the name of justice for Michael are actually benefiting themselves? Of all the people Taaj? I am disappointed at her so bad. I met her in LA during the anniversary and I thought of her very highly.

    Oh please God help, this is the time we need you so bad. I can’t even think straight now.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Bonnie,

    You said you are taking 2 days off.

    You go right ahead! You've earned it!

    I'll be here when you get back.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Josie - you are right, Sony Kills.

    I am hurt so bad, and I can't even sleep.

    Can you imagine the pain Michael went for many, many years? That is the most painful to me.

    Bonnie is right, where are his friends and all those associates he worked with ever since he was a child. Where are they? Why they are silent?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Mimi,

    I really don't think anyone could have helped Michael vs Sony except for other music artist.

    Friends, not so much except for emotional support.

    But if ALL or MOST of the other musical artists went on STRIKE vs Sony, then I think alot could have been changed!

    There is Power in Numbers!

    But, yeah, it's downright sad that Michael was left all alone in this fight.

    Most of the others were probably afraid for their careers or their lives.

    It Sucks!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Bonnie, wow you did it, and why am I NOT surprised? I'm with SandyK (and see you have acknowledged); I'm glad you have an attorney watching out for your interests. I concluded long ago that Michael was fighting for his life (someone said he signed his own death warrant) when he so magnificently took on Sony. No one helped or supported him; support from other artists would have been crucial. These same artists will remember Michael's valor when they themselves are attacked by their own label. I think often of Sony's demand that Michael tour for Invincible as part of their "support" for the album; Michael was a single parent of two small children; obviously the corporate mind of Sony could not have cared less about his children. So now his advocates will, and MUST, watch out for their interests.
    Bonnie - looking forward to the report on the lawsuits, but please take care and rest that inquisitive mind!

    ReplyDelete
  22. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Michael's so-called "friends" and associates were and are nothing but greedy cowards to leave him all alone. Sure, some now speak up after his "death", easy enough (since SONY is now busy trying to clean up his reputation that they destroyed!). Many didn't and still don't want to become unpopular or fend off the resulting attacks that they know would be the aftermath, the only result of loyalty they care about. Those dastardly gutless "friends" distance themselves, put their CAREERS first...for the love of MONEY and REPUTATION!

    Apparently it's become more acceptable to stand by and watch as an innocent is raped, dismembered and burned in the press, than to stand up and defend against the lies. It's even more acceptable to join in the abuse than to stand steadfast and speak out from the unpopular sidelines of honor and truth.

    Professing love and loyalty are only words blown away with the breeze. Vultures (as outlined in this series of posts) are rampant and that is what the traitors, including those Michael thought were friends, have aligned themselves with but are too self-important to even entertain the reality. They can stuff their money and choke on their fame. I have no respect for any of them, famous or not. Money and fame do not an honorable character make. You can't take it with you and when they're standing before God, it will be too late to make the positive differences that they had the money and influence to effect, too late to be sorry.

    These supposed fans are every bit as guilty, using "Justice for Michael" as a vehicle to become rich and famous. SHAME ON THEM!!!

    I would be happier in a shantytown knowing I at least did the right thing.

    Let the blood of LIBERTY and TRUTH wash over me, at least I died trying!

    Got your back Bonnie and I am not alone!

    ReplyDelete
  24. You deserve a rest. That is a lot of research and information. I echo what has been said, be careful, Bonnie. I have had to curtail my research for a time to look after my lovely nephew, so I rely on your factual research. Thank you for sharing what you do.

    I am really angry and disappointed that Michael's fans have allowed themselves to be splintered so. I hope with more people exposing the charlatans, we can become the cohesive, effective group he expected us to be.

    Until the next time, One Love.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Bonnie – I couldn’t sleep and I woke up several times thinking about all these ordeal you went through. My admiration I have for you is very deep. Please hang in there and continue being careful from those who come close to you in the name of justice for Michael. Dissect, and analyze them thoroughly just like you did to Stephanie and at the end they will fall into their own trap they created.

    What bothering me the most are:

    She lied saying she currently working for TMZ when she is not, and for her to admit at the end she left the company on February 2010.

    She went through a whole analysis of Michael to prove that she is his ally and she fights for justice which she is not.

    She flatly lied about “half century movie production” company that doesn’t exist to do her documentary.

    She echoing the same rhetoric we’ve been hearing that David Geffen was the one who helped Michael in signing the 100 million dolor deal which in fact Branca was the one, and there is proof for that.

    She continued her echoing the same rhetoric we’ve been hearing that Branca got hired back after he was fired in 2003 and resigned in 2006 without showing any proof.

    She continued again her echoing the same rhetoric that Michael hired Branca back in June 2009 a few days before he dies with no proof to show us.

    And then, when you inquire her about Samantha and her follower implicating that brother Jermaine is involve in the death of his brother, she came back supporting he has his hand in killing his brother? I couldn’t believe it.

    So sad very so sad. How did Michael handle all these throughout his life. No wonder he couldn’t sleep. What a pain being surrounded with deceivers, liars, opportunist, and totally back stabbers all his life, folks.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Speaking of "fire"...Supposedly an Italian based website is claiming that Thomas Sneddon has been indicted for the entire '93 - '05 fiasco against Michael!!! The downside of this is that I've researched this and NOTHING...I mean NOTHING has come of it. However, William Wagener is looking into it via his YT site: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unC1uRZm9hg

    AND...he claims that he'll know more by this Friday, and he's trying to find out. So, stay tuned...

    ANOTHER interesting article I did however come across is this one: "The Latest Legal Crime Involving Michael Jackson Where LA Justice Is On Trial" http://www.alien-encounter.com/conspiracy-theories/the-latest-legal-crime-involving-michael-jackson-where-la-justice-is-on-trial/

    Enjoy!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Oh, and Bonnie...regarding the clarification of Stephanie's lack of "homework", you're quite welcome. :)

    ReplyDelete
  28. Bonnie - she was inviting you to come to LA for interview. If she is not working for TMZ as she said, under what company banner was she going to interview you?

    Do you believe about this documentary they were planning to do? If she is not working for TMZ and if we say she is not Sony planted, for whom is this lady trying to do documentary about Michael?

    ReplyDelete
  29. Maybe someone could help me understand something...why would Stephanie want her project to be a secret? When Stephanie first contacted Bonnie, and Bonnie has no obligation to her, but she asks Bonnie to keep her secret of making this documentary? Is this the way Hollywood usually works, or could it be because there was something shady about the project?

    ReplyDelete
  30. Lady – are you saying Tom Sneddon currently has been indicted for 93-05 Michaels’ case? Who indicted him?

    ReplyDelete
  31. I am sorry Bonnie to ask this question. When Taaj said her and Sammy “were doing a documentary and possibly a weekly T.V. show”, is it about Michael? is this the same documentary about Michael Stephanie is talking to you to come on board?

    ReplyDelete
  32. @Rhoda - I concluded from reading the post that Stephanie wanted it kept secret so that Sony/Branca wouldn't know about it and the estate file some objection, as the estate has done to so many projects unless the idea is Sony's! Or there could be something shady about the project, that's true.

    ReplyDelete
  33. @Mesrak and Lady - that would be the best news EVER if Sneddon were to be indicted; seems the most reliable info on that would come from William Wagner, so we have to wait and see. Sounds too good to be true.

    ReplyDelete
  34. LadyA,
    Read your comment and and checked the links. The thing that doesn't sit right with me about this whole conspiracy situation is the multiple inconsistancies. I believe some are deliberate and some are to cover more than just a "murder".

    I say this because its too obvious. All the information thats out. Bonnie said it herself that the majority of sources are tabloid rags. You don't hear much from main stream media. Is it because those that are directly involved are powerful enough to block it? Maybe...To much has been left to speculation and assumptions.

    One crook pointing the finger at another crook. Its almost laughable.

    The thing that is always in the back of my mind is Michael was far too intelligent. Why would he allow himself to be put under when he clearly knew the risk and dangers. Was he that desperate? I simply just don't buy it. He knew that proper monitoring was vital. My mind is open to any and all possibilities but I am simply not convinced.

    Another thing is this, Brian Oxman(who is questionable in mind) made the statement that Michael lived his life in secret and that it is difficult to get valid information. It was a reason Oxman made that statement and I am trying to put it all together. The suit that he filed, were did they get the info about the intervention? Did Murray reveal that to point the finger at AEG? Hmmmmm

    Bonnie's extensive researched has put alot of things together from public information and so have so many others that come to basically the same conclusion. He was setup and murdered and Murray either is the scapegoat or completely incompetent.

    Who is the heavy in all this, AEG/Colony Capital or Branca/Sony? Fans are fighting and becoming divided. Bloggers are discrediting each other. Its bordering on retarded if not outright crazy.

    Bonnie I will give you your props. I have read alot of blogs, message boards, articles, books and you tube investigations. Your blog seems the most sincere in searching for the truth. You will call a spade a spade and your cognitive skills are sharp. Good job!!!!!

    Truth is Freedom

    ReplyDelete
  35. Rhoda said...

    Maybe someone could help me understand something...why would Stephanie want her project to be a secret? When Stephanie first contacted Bonnie, and Bonnie has no obligation to her, but she asks Bonnie to keep her secret of making this documentary? Is this the way Hollywood usually works, or could it be because there was something shady about the project?

    ************************************************

    Rhoda,

    I can think of 2 reasons why Stephanie may have wanted Bonnie to keep the Project a Secret.

    1. It's possible that Stephanie wanted Bonnie to keep it a secret because there was something shady about it.

    2. It's possible Stephanie just wanted the project to sound more inticing and Special. Maybe Steph was trying to "Bait" Bonnie with this talk of keeping it a Secret.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Rhoda
    I agree with Josie. I also think she was on a phishing expedition and didn't want Bonnie questioning others about her that could expose some possible truths about her true intentions.

    ReplyDelete
  37. This whole project about a Documentary was a Set Up.

    Just like the Set Up that was pulled on Michael with the Martin Bashir Documentary.

    Stephanie was going to get Bonnie to talk and then later start a "Smear Campaign" against Bonnie to bring Bonnie down.

    ReplyDelete
  38. missshae40 ~ it sounds to me, from what Bonnie has revealed, as though Branca/Sony/Mottola (though Mottola has mostly faded into the background) are the main bad guys and Colony Capitol has supported Michael in his endeavors. I don't know about AEG's role, that is still unclear to me.

    ReplyDelete
  39. @missshae40,

    I hear your frustration. I ask similar question before that Michael should have private and personal investigators investigate everyone who come close to him and present him facts about the person of interest and document their finding. However, I thought about it and who are those people he can depend on truthfully so they can give him the most honest absolute findings? NO BODY. They all are crooked and money hungry.

    You are right he is too intelligent and that’s why he survived this many years fighting by himself and succeeded many times, but finally they succeed taking his life.

    ReplyDelete
  40. I was told by someone whom I don't THINK wants to be named that Taaj at Playboy this weekend was NOT a meeting with Joe. Joe was doing a PAID APPEARANCE at the Playboy club in Vegas, Taaj and Sammy through Lorene found out about it and went up there for a photo op. They were not treated to ANYTHING by Joe Jackson.

    I can't believe these people.

    ReplyDelete
  41. This is my opinion only) but could you imagine

    if all or most of the music artists jumped on

    the band wagon with Michael vs Sony and

    Motolla, the Changes that would have brought to

    Sony Industrys?

    They could have turned that place Upside Down!!

    Remember now, Michael DID get Motolla to step down as CEO/President of Sony!

    The Music Artists could have Finally gotten a FAIR DEAL on their albums, copyrights, etc.

    They could have taken over and re-vamped the place!

    That's what Michael wanted.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Lady!!!! - Speaking of "fire"...Supposedly an Italian based website is claiming that Thomas Sneddon has been indicted for the entire '93 - '05 fiasco against Michael!!! The downside of this is that I've researched this and NOTHING...I mean NOTHING has come of it. However, William Wagener is looking into it via his YT site: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unC1uRZm9hg "


    I am SOOOOOOOOOOOO PRAYING THIS IS TRUE!!!!! OMWord!!!!! Please, pleasepleasepleaseplease!!!!! I don't want to cry! Idontwannacryidontwannacry!!!! I'm crying! :o((((

    I was telling one of my clients today the whole story about Michael (in condensed form). She said, "I had no idea. I never knew all that about him". She is an elderly lady but she remembered the stuff in the news about him.

    I got called twice today by Stephanie. She is very upset with me (I want to point out that she did NOT implicate Jermaine in Michael's murder, only that Jermaine was not to be trusted and that Sammy was right, which of course, she wasn't).

    I have a question. If someone works for the media, why would they use their PERSONAL EMAIL ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBERS to contact interviewees? Especially about something as volitile as this? That is what told me that she is not who she says she is. If you work in media for that many years, you do NOT give out your personal info, you use the office. Especially after that one anchor woman was stalked and killed!

    Anyhow, I took everything down. She said she would never contact me again. She asked me to take down the contents of the emails, but I told her no. If they can post personal emails of Randy Phillips and their contents, I can post hers. She's not above the laws she lays down either.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Bonnie, you are right about Joe Jackson being in Vegas.

    My neighbors went to Vegas this past weekend and they said they stood in line at a Resturant and brushed sholders with Joe Jackson.

    At the time, they had no idea is was Joe. They never watched the Jacksons.

    But they overheard other patrons in the resturant saying, Hey! That's Joe Jackson!

    My neighbor then called me on my cell to let me know about it because she knows I'm a fan of The Jackson.

    It's a Small World, isn't it!

    ReplyDelete
  44. Josie ~ "smear campaign" interesting hypothesis.

    There is no evidence this Stephanie is who she says she is. All we really have is an online resume that links to her phone number. Unless of course I missed something. Uploading a resume as proof of your identity and credentials is not much different than using a photoshopped photo to prove a personal friendship with MJ.

    As someone supposedly with a journalistic background, it seems odd to me that she very distinctly takes Taaj and her friends' side over Hulya because of one supposed incident? Why not go over and get Hulya's side too if you had no prior knowledge and are a professional creating a doc about Michael? Why not interview her too? You can leave it on the cuttingroom floor but when you're right there with 2 (or more?) groups of MJ fans, why pass up a possible opportunity?

    Missshae40 ~
    "The thing that is always in the back of my mind is Michael was far too intelligent. Why would he allow himself to be put under when he clearly knew the risk and dangers. Was he that desperate? I simply just don't buy it. He knew that proper monitoring was vital."

    I totally agree!

    ReplyDelete
  45. GOOD FOR YOU BONNIE! GOOD FOR YOU!

    Stephanie is out of her mind!

    These kinds of people have "Illusions of Grandur" about themselves!

    After a while, they start to believe they really are VIP's!

    Hopefully Reality will smack them in the face and bring them back to Earth!

    ReplyDelete
  46. TINI WEBSITE INFO: (SENT TO ME BY SOMEONE WHO DOES NOT WANT TO BE NAMED)

    this is not it and found that when they started and had all these ridiculous nonsensical testimonies that all technically contradicted each other but yet had the same style of writing (not saying Sony but 1 fan likely) calling Michael a drug addict and this and that was registered with an expensive web hosting company in Culver City that also runs Sonys systems.

    Domain Name: THIS-IS-NOT-IT.COM
    Created on: 27-Sep-09
    Expires on: 27-Sep-10
    Last Updated on: 08-Oct-09


    Domain servers in listed order:
    NS1.MEDIATEMPLE.NET
    NS2.MEDIATEMPLE.NET

    Server Type: Apache/2.0.54
    IP Address: XXXXX
    IP Location - California - Culver City - Media Temple Inc


    Then it was Changed in Jan 2010 when new people came in to run TINI



    Registrant Search:
    "Domains by Proxy, Inc." owns about622 other domains
    Registrar History:
    1 registrar
    NS History:
    3 changes on 4 unique name servers over 1 year.
    IP History:
    4 changes on 5 unique name servers over 1 years.
    Whois History:
    39 records have been archived since 2009-09-29 .
    Reverse IP:
    1,080 other sites hosted on this server.
    Log In or Create a FREE account to start monitoring this domain name

    DomainTools for Windows®

    Now you can access domain ownership records anytime, anywhere... right from your own desktop! Download Now>
    Registrant:
    Domains by Proxy, Inc.
    DomainsByProxy.com
    15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
    United States

    Domain Name: THIS-IS-NOT-IT.COM
    Created on: 27-Sep-09
    Expires on: 27-Sep-10
    Last Updated on: 10-Jan-10

    Administrative Contact:
    Private, Registration
    Domains by Proxy, Inc.
    DomainsByProxy.com
    15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
    United States
    (480) 624-2599 Fax -- (480) 624-2598

    Technical Contact:
    Private, Registration
    Domains by Proxy, Inc.
    DomainsByProxy.com
    15111 N. Hayden Rd., Ste 160, PMB 353
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
    United States
    (480) 624-2599 Fax -- (480) 624-2598

    Domain servers in listed order:
    NS1.THIS-IS-NOT-IT.COM
    NS2.THIS-IS-NOT-IT.COM

    Media temple is a very expensive high end super professional web hosting site. They work with Sony, ABC, Starbucks, Toyota,NBC Universal, Warner Brothers,Loreal and more. Not exactly budget friendly especially compared too other domain servers....

    ReplyDelete
  47. Bonnie,
    So someone with money set it up. It can be the obvious suspects or the not so obvious behind it.

    ReplyDelete
  48. So TINI website is run by the Media. Right?

    ReplyDelete
  49. In other words, we are NOT to trust the

    TINI Website. Right?

    ReplyDelete
  50. Thank You Bonnie!

    Keep on exposing The Frauds!

    ReplyDelete
  51. Bonnie - I second Josie. keep on exposing Frauds and this is the only way truth will win.

    ReplyDelete
  52. When you click on the TINI internal links you get:
    "404 Not Found
    The resource requested could not be found on this server! Powered By LiteSpeed Web Server
    LiteSpeed Technologies is not responsible for administration and contents of this web site!"

    External links work but ALL their internal links have been down for awhile now - header, sidebar & footer.

    ReplyDelete
  53. @ Bonnie: "I have a question. If someone works for the media, why would they use their PERSONAL EMAIL ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBERS to contact interviewees? Especially about something as volitile as this? That is what told me that she is not who she says she is. If you work in media for that many years, you do NOT give out your personal info, you use the office. Especially after that one anchor woman was stalked and killed!"

    You're right. That too would have drawn some "flagging" from me. I had some email correspondence with press for local thingies a few yrs. ago, and NEVER was I given any personal stuff. It was all strictly business addies and whatnotall.

    "Anyhow, I took everything down. She said she would never contact me again. She asked me to take down the contents of the emails, but I told her no. If they can post personal emails of Randy Phillips and their contents, I can post hers. She's not above the laws she lays down either."

    I agree with this too. What is good for the goose, is good for the gander.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Be it known that Yazmeen is now on the attack. I have private emails from her and I will post them if she continues.

    She is siding with TINI.

    So far today I have had four phone calls and three emails from Stephanie W. (okay sweetheart?) who doesn't want her last name on the blog even though she's not above slandering other's with their full names.

    I have recieved two phone calls from Taaj (which I have not returned. He left one message yesterday, but no message today) and one FB private message.

    I have received three emails from Yazmeen. The first one was telling me how "misinformed" I was. I answered that one and told her I was not above posting her emails either (I know HER past behavior). She sent back two threatening emails.

    All of them have been sent to the authorities (which ones??? I'll let THEM guess.)

    So just a heads up. If you have the same username here as you do on twitter or facebook and you don't want to be bothered, I suggest changing it.

    God Bless you.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Taaj is a she by the way, excuse the typo.

    ReplyDelete
  56. @ Bonnie,

    I just deleted my facebook account.

    I didn't like facebook anyway.

    Can they still find my e-mail address now?

    ReplyDelete
  57. @ Mimi: I'm sorry, I missed your Q to me earlier. Thus far, all I've been able to find out about the alleged Sneddon indictment is that is exactly all that it is...alleged. I've done some searching for more conclusive links, and there is NOTHING of the sort. But, I gave what I had to Bonnie. Maybe she'll have better luck. All that I know about it, I've posted in here, and supposedly the whole story comes out of some Italian website. That's all that I know.

    IF such is indeed true, I would imagine that they (the Media) would like to keep such under wraps as long as possible because it's yet another slap in the face to them as well as Sneddon because of what they did to Michael for one thing. Another thing here is that there is MORE than just Sneddon involved in the whole investigation and eventual trial of Michael and that spans from 1993 (beginning with the Chandler crapola) to the 2005 trial itself (the Arvizo matter). You can bet your sweet peas that if Sneddon goes down, a whole lot of dominoes will follow. That's for darned sure...

    ReplyDelete
  58. I just De-Activated my facebook account.

    Can they still find my e-mail address now?

    ReplyDelete
  59. DEar Bonnie,
    This is more of the article.
    GRAPHICS: MICHAEL JACKSON PHONE MESSAGES

    CHRIS CUOMO: (Voice Over) This is Marc from the tapes, Marc Schaffel. He says for over two years, he was an advisor and close confidant for Jackson. According to Schaffel, Jackson's bankers placed restrictions on the big spender so he would use middle men like Schaffel to access his own money and arrange various loans.

    HOWARD KING (ATTORNEY FOR MARC SCHAFFEL): He uses people like Marc Schaffel and now whoever he's currently using to get around the restrictions on his current financing.

    CHRIS CUOMO: (Voice Over) And Schaffel says often the money had to be in cash and in very large amounts, sometimes requested in code.

    MICHAEL JACKSON: You gotta get me some fries - it's big money overseas.

    CHRIS CUOMO: (Voice Over) Schaffel says he once delivered $100,000 in an Arby's fast food bag. The joke was that Schaffel had brought Jackson some fries.

    F. MARC SCHAFFEL: When he wanted large amounts, he would call and say, supersize them.

    CHRIS CUOMO: (Off Camera) Millions of dollars, sometimes in an Arby's bag.

    F. MARC SCHAFFEL: The smaller amounts. The bigger ones went in duffel bags.

    CHRIS CUOMO: (Voice Over) And Schaffel provided more than money. In 2003, Jackson turned to his advisor to plan a response to the allegations that Jackson had had an improper relationship with a young cancer survivor. Later, Schaffel would be named an unindicted co-conspirator in the California criminal prosecution of Jackson. But now, Schaffel is suing his former pal for millions in a breach of contract case. Schaffel says he has hundreds of voice mail messages that he received from Jackson between 2001 and 2003 that showed the nature of his relationship. They also create a portrait of the many faces of Michael Jackson, sweet and strident.

    MICHAEL JACKSON: I don't want no ifs, ands, or buts, do it now. Do it now, okay?

    F. MARC SCHAFFEL: Michael will yell at you, Michael will punish you, maybe not



    Read more: http://newsbusters.org/node/2963#ixzz0z5nYzX9S

    ReplyDelete
  60. @ Josie: "So TINI website is run by the Media. Right? " Not just the Media...we're talking SONY. The audacity of these freaks astounds even me. Here, they go and plant people to claim "this n' that" about Michael being frail, etc. while prepping for the TINI tour AND...what do they do??? The people they plant use photoshopped photos to not only gain popularity amongst Michael's fanbase, they use them and their site to deceive them. How low can these people go? I'd say VERY.

    On the other hand, here these Sony idiots did not obviously anticipate the anger the curiosity, the courage, and the resolve of the MJ fans to want to dig to discover the TRUTH of what happened to Michael. THAT was a HUGE mistake on their part.

    Worse, Sam DeGosson has taken it upon herself to use her Twitter to openly bash Bonnie and us: http://twitter.com/100N121 and her Twitlonger tweet: http://xltweet.com/show/?id=515850555C

    Amusing...

    ReplyDelete
  61. @ Mimi & Lady Aquarius,

    I sure hope this is For Real about Sneddon.

    You're right Lady, if it is For Real, Sneddon will squeal like a PIG!

    ReplyDelete
  62. Dear bonnie,
    Here it is again! Im not good with a computer thats why i cant do what you do! Iam good at research! lol.
    GRAPHICS: MICHAEL JACKSON PHONE MESSAGES

    CHRIS CUOMO: (Voice Over) This is Marc from the tapes, Marc Schaffel. He says for over two years, he was an advisor and close confidant for Jackson. According to Schaffel, Jackson's bankers placed restrictions on the big spender so he would use middle men like Schaffel to access his own money and arrange various loans.

    HOWARD KING (ATTORNEY FOR MARC SCHAFFEL): He uses people like Marc Schaffel and now whoever he's currently using to get around the restrictions on his current financing.

    CHRIS CUOMO: (Voice Over) And Schaffel says often the money had to be in cash and in very large amounts, sometimes requested in code.

    MICHAEL JACKSON: You gotta get me some fries - it's big money overseas.

    CHRIS CUOMO: (Voice Over) Schaffel says he once delivered $100,000 in an Arby's fast food bag. The joke was that Schaffel had brought Jackson some fries.

    F. MARC SCHAFFEL: When he wanted large amounts, he would call and say, supersize them.

    CHRIS CUOMO: (Off Camera) Millions of dollars, sometimes in an Arby's bag.

    F. MARC SCHAFFEL: The smaller amounts. The bigger ones went in duffel bags.

    CHRIS CUOMO: (Voice Over) And Schaffel provided more than money. In 2003, Jackson turned to his advisor to plan a response to the allegations that Jackson had had an improper relationship with a young cancer survivor. Later, Schaffel would be named an unindicted co-conspirator in the California criminal prosecution of Jackson. But now, Schaffel is suing his former pal for millions in a breach of contract case. Schaffel says he has hundreds of voice mail messages that he received from Jackson between 2001 and 2003 that showed the nature of his relationship. They also create a portrait of the many faces of Michael Jackson, sweet and strident.

    MICHAEL JACKSON: I don't want no ifs, ands, or buts, do it now. Do it now, okay?

    F. MARC SCHAFFEL: Michael will yell at you, Michael will punish you, maybe not



    Read more: http://newsbusters.org/node/2963#ixzz0z5nYzX9S

    ReplyDelete
  63. @ Lady,

    Sam is a Fraud!

    I don't have a Twitter account so I can't read what she says.

    I like the idea that she is bashing us though.

    Proves we got her right where it hurts the most.

    And ...SONY KILLS!

    Hey Lady, it's alright! We are on to them now and there is no going back.

    They are all being Exposed to the world via the Internet and there is nothing they can do to stop it!

    Yipee!!

    ReplyDelete
  64. @ Josie: For the record...I pray it's true too, for Michael's sake!!!

    ReplyDelete
  65. @Lady,

    Thank you so much for answering my question. I am amazed how some authority figures most of the time get away with murder. If Sneddon is not indicted by now, I don’t know if it will ever happen with all the evidences documented against him.

    Someone is protecting him from the higher up in the government. What a shame, this country supposes to be a country of laws – Baloney.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Dear Bonnie,

    This is the beging of the article!
    Michael Jackson Refers to Jews as “Leeches”; Where’s the Media Outrage?
    By Noel Sheppard (Bio | Archive)
    Fri, 11/25/2005 - 11:58 ET

    ABC’s “Good Morning America” on Tuesday broke a story about Michael Jackson that has received surprisingly little press. In a report about the pop star’s finances, as well as his relationship with financial advisors, an audiotape was played of a telephone message Jackson left for a former business associate:

    JACKSON: They suck - they're like leeches. I'm so tired of it. They start out the most popular person in the world, make a lot of money, big house, cars, and everything, end up with, penniless. It is conspiracy. The Jews do it on purpose.


    On Wednesday, the Anti-Defamation League officially demanded an apology from Jackson:

    "It is important now for Mr. Jackson to stand up and acknowledge that his words are hurtful and hateful. He needs to show his fans that he rejects bigotry and is truly serious about stamping out, in his words, 'the ugliness of racism, anti- Semitism and stereotyping.' This can only begin with an apology to Jews everywhere, especially those fans who have been deeply hurt and offended by his words."


    This segment was featured at 7AM ET on Tuesday, and the statement from the ADL was released at 11:34AM ET on Wednesday. This means that more than 72 hours have passed since this story broke, and 48 since the ADL statement. Yet, a Google news search of the phrase “Michael Jackson Jews” produced only 234 results. By contrast, a similar search of “Cindy Sheehan” yielded 3540 results.

    I guess that tells us what the media’s priorities are.

    What follows is a full transcript of this segment.

    DIANE SAWYER: But first, we have heard so much, as we know, about Michael Jackson and the mysteries of his money, his relationships with his business partners. Well, we have executively this morning some phone messages left by the



    Read more: http://newsbusters.org/node/2963#ixzz0z5s4jXd1

    ReplyDelete
  67. For those of you without Twitter, here's Sam's full Tweet:

    To Bonnie Cox and Co.

    I’m not one to usually respond to hateful posts or comments about me (and there have been a few) but I thought I would this time. Especially when one person alone takes the time to dedicate some of her long blog entries to me, without having once met me or even spoken to me, even though she was on my FB for months and never posted a single comment.

    According to her the reason I shut my FB down was because I was “caught”, “busted” photo shopping my picture with Michael. However, it’s not the first time I’ve been accused of that and I’ve never responded to any of those accusations before. If you wish to believe it is photo shopped then so be it. And no, this not the reason I shut my page down, I shut it down from an accumulation of spiteful, hateful attacks from the same bunch of people over the last year and yes, it did get to me and I decided to shut it down for a while, to clear my head of all the nonsense that leads me and everyone absolutely nowhere except further into the gutter.

    The day before I shut it down I got a comment on my FB wall from a Bonnie Cox “declaring” she was deleting herself from my page. I didn’t pay much attention to it other than the fact I didn’t even know she was on my page to begin with but recognized her name. What I had heard was that she was a good blogger and someone who knew a lot about the fight for Justice. I always heard positive things about her so I wondered where that suddenly came from but paid no more attention to it until the next day when I was forwarded her new blog entry. A whole blog entry directed at me and my friend Karen Faye. This was forwarded to me by several people I know and who were in total disbelief, they didn’t recognize her.

    Continued...

    ReplyDelete
  68. I began reading it, not really expecting much more than the usual crap I usually read about myself and Karen Faye. Karen and I have had the “privilege” of having our very own personal and dedicated hate groups and we always seem to be put together, and attacked together, by the same people. As ridiculous as these groups are, what an honor!

    To my surprise, most of the blog part about me was interestingly revolving around my picture with Michael. It went on and on and on about it…I was accused of photo shopping it, that all my claims about my experiences were false and then more comments about “hear-say” from other people (the same bunch, always the same!). That I was a stalker, that Michael hated me, that security had a picture of me and the other followers for security purposes to keep us away from him, etc etc…the list is long!

    Not once did Bonnie ever write to me asking if my picture was photo shopped or bothered trying to find out from me why people were claiming all those things about me and what my take was on it. She stayed quietly on my FB for months, just lurking around.

    It would make no difference if I sent her the original photo file with all the properties info embedded in the picture; she would find a way to deny it’s genuine. She simply does not want to know, she has already decided it is fake. Her problem, not mine.

    What’s interesting is that she never claimed anyone else’s pictures that were taken that day of being fake, just mine. Hmmm…

    And then we have the story of the picture Michael kept of us to remind security of the stalkers we supposedly were. This is where stories get twisted by envy and jealousy. Because let’s get down to the bottom of it, isn’t this all about some fans resenting others for something they never had or attention they so desperately are seeking, and that it’s much easier to envy than to appreciate?

    The story of the picture came from Karen Faye herself. Karen met up with us the day of the This Is It premiere, to mourn Michael on the day when everyone else were running to movie theaters to see the fall of their idol on the big screen. She told us Michael kept a picture on his make-up table the last few weeks of his life and looked at it every day, it was even taken to Staples Center for the last 2 days of rehearsals. She then showed us the picture. It was a picture we had given Michael, the famous “7” picture. A much different story than the envious explaination of it.

    This is not a story I shared first on my page. Karen publicly told the story in response to hateful comments at the time and I reposted it the day after. This is just ONE example of how stories get twisted and lied about by the very same bunch of people who have had either no contact with me at all but who are raging with jealousy, or have simply been deleted from my page and hold a personal grudge. Furthermore, “attention envy” has become so important to some that they cannot bear to see others have a “following” which comes, like in my case, without needing to create a fan-club, fan page, hate group, fan group or sell anything.

    Continued...

    ReplyDelete
  69. All I’ve done, in the past year on my FB is simply share some things I know, some personal memories, personal beliefs and push fans to seek out the truth about what happened to Michael. I’ve posted some pictures, some videos, glimpses of my wonderful and magical experiences but also sad and important ones that should be known about the last few weeks of his life. I even participated in a few documentaries to spread the murder conspiracy theories and I have accused all parties I believe are involved, not just AEG like Bonnie claims in her latest blog entry. I guess she just didn’t like my latest FB status claiming a link between Jermaine, his wife, Thome Thome and Randy Phillips. Next thing you know she accuses me of saying Jermaine killed his brother….go figure! But people read and twist things to their advantage, whatever advantage it could possibly bring them.

    So basically this is the deal: If I only have one picture with Michael then I am accused of only having met him once. Next thing you know I no longer have met him, it’s photo shopped. Then when I post more I’m accused of gloating and showing off. There’s just no talking to deaf ears, you just can’t win, it’s not Truth they’re out to get, just pure hate-spewing and collective hysteria.

    I have no problem whether you believe me or not Bonnie Cox and the hate groups, but it really shouldn’t be the focus of your fight for Justice…although as I understand it now you think he may be alive…whatever you believe, I have never called you out on anything or even had the chance to ever talk to you and here I get blasted by yet another blog entry from you. Still going on about me, even going as far as accusing me of being PLANTED by the powers! Have you totally lost it???

    For someone who does great research, as you claim, maybe you should have researched just a little bit better some of your claims. I think you got my name mixed up a couple of times with someone else, but you wouldn’t know, you weren’t there and your “research” was based on hear-say.

    Continued...

    ReplyDelete
  70. And Bonnie, for someone who is so methodical and writes generally quite intelligently, I have to give you that, why would you delete all the comments you got on your blog entry that you disliked and kept only the ones that gave you the thumbs up? Those thumbs up on those blog entries come from the very same bunch of people you got all your hear-say from and have had hate groups against me and Karen for months. That gives you no credibility! Maybe you should have left all the comments and addressed them, since you must surely stand by what you say and be able to prove your point all the way to the end! But no, you couldn’t do it, instead you wrote a new entry, 6 pages long, still about me and exposing Stephanie Wilburn’s personal email correspondence with you, even going as far as publishing her phone number and physical address. To prove what point I don’t know but that went a little far. Your blog entries have become so ridiculous and so spiteful that you may very well have lost a very good thing you had going in the first place, and turned to the same mob mentality you accuse me of.

    So what does it really boil down to here? What is it that you and a bunch of other haters (always the same few) really have against me that it keeps you people awake at night and dictates so much of your life to write about me? Do you not have families, jobs, other hobbies? If it’s your quest to expose me as a fraud and to discredit me then I think you’ve already spent enough time on it, unless you have nothing better to do.

    The only thing you may not have realized by doing this is that you’ve made me bigger and more important than I ever intended to be. You make me bigger than I am, do you realize that? I guess the saying “There is no such thing as bad publicity” would fit perfectly here. And the more venom you people spit the more adrenaline rush I get to fight harder for the cause, but the right cause, not by doing what you and a bunch of hateful women do day after day and which really doesn’t achieve anything, except ridicule you once it becomes this insanely barfed all over the pace.

    Who cares whether you think I’m a fraud, let it be your belief and move on. I’ve had my share of fans I’ve met or seen online claiming they knew him. I don’t ask for proof if they have none, and if they do, I don’t go and investigate their every claim or try to discredit them for the simple reason that I have no reason to. I’m happy for anyone who got to meet him and experience the Magic! Good for them! And If it’s a lie then it’s really not my problem either. There is no more competition, Michael is DEAD. And whatever people want to claim won’t change my life or keep me up at night like it does for you. Everyone knows their own truth, it’s something they have to live with. I am perfectly happy with mine.

    And finally, I am so grateful for all the love and support I get from so many people. Thank you! I’m reopening my FB after so many messages asking me to come back. Yes, I will. Let’s continue the fight and let’s continue the LOVE!

    Samantha de Gosson
    http://xltweet.com/show/?id=515850555C

    ReplyDelete
  71. Now...for my commentary:

    Sam needs to realize one thing here. What was done by certain TINI members has NOTHING to do with competition. It has to do with DECEPTION and LIES. If these people truly KNEW Michael, then there is NO NEED for photoshopped photos of them with him, is there??? So why the BS???

    And...note how she NEVER addresses the now exposed TINI website for what it is ANYWHERE in her "tweet." Hmm...

    ReplyDelete
  72. @Lady,

    I don’t have twitter too so I can’t use the link you attached. What is some of the things she is saying? I am curious.

    Anyway, let her talk. She will crumble in her own making soon. For the division and animosity she and her like created among Michael’s fan base, they will pay a heavy price.

    I pray for all those genuine and loving fans of Michael to take the time and learn the truth who the real enemy of Michael for years that lead him to his death bed, and to come together to voice as one and keep his legacy forever.

    ReplyDelete
  73. @ Mimi: Scroll upwards, I just posted her "tweet" in its entirety.

    ReplyDelete
  74. @Lady:
    Thank you, I saw it. Wow!!!! Amazing. I agree about what you said that she did not mention any thing about TINI. Do you know why? You don’t know how much it breaks my heart to see Michael’s fans divided like this. What can be done to restore this Lady?

    ReplyDelete
  75. Josie - No, they cannot get to your email address. If you deleted it (you didn't have to do that, just change the name and make your email private in the settings). but I want NO ONE bothering you!

    Nita - I laughed the first time I saw this. I could not in a million years, picture Michael saying "Do it Now! Do it Now, okay?" Nor could I picture Michael yelling AT someone, except maybe the press when they got too close to his children or his mother in the car trying to leave the trial one day.

    Lady - your version is longer or seems longer than the one I saw when I went to the twitter page. And let us remind people just how Samantha reacts if you question ANYTHING about her. I HAVE commented on her page and I have commented on her pictures (other ones) like ones of Michael that I thought looked like a mannequin because the folds of his ears had no depth to them. You get cursed off the page. She wants us to ask her questions to be treated like that? It was her treatment of people that made me stop posting to her page. Unless you mindlessly agree with what she says, you're called any number of slurs or slangs and told "stop the bulls___"

    Samantha sweetheart, aggression does not equal truth. It's not the same "haters" as you call them, it's simply people that saw you for what you are. I would LOVE IT if what we learned was not true . . . I really, really would. Because what I AM FINDING OUT is that Michael's true friends are much less in number than I originally thought and it just SHOWS ME how TRULY isolated he was and how incredibly dangerous a position he was in.

    And the harder YOU PEOPLE FIGHT and attack, the more you reveal yourselves.

    Sorry Lady . . . what were you saying???

    ReplyDelete
  76. Samantha is going to put her page back up, so she announces. I wonder if she is going to replace the pictures over at TINI? I wonder if these will be more digitally enhanced? Like maybe this time she can fix the color bleed in the iris of her left eye and study COMPOSITION before trying to place fake shadows behind her head.

    Samantha? You will need to fix the Golden Gate Pictures of yourself on flickr as well . . . you forgot to put a shadow in for yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  77. She also missed my comment on the other photos in that group . . . of the two that were sent to me, yes, photo shopped too. Jeff? Did you get that?

    ReplyDelete
  78. @Bonnie,

    I just saw you post concerning:

    "I HAVE commented on her page and I have commented on her pictures (other ones) like ones of Michael that I thought looked like a mannequin because the folds of his ears had no depth to them. You get cursed off the page."

    I didn't see this before I submitted my comment.

    ReplyDelete
  79. Bonnie - I believe what you said. It really touched my heart. "What I AM FINDING OUT is that Michael's true friends are much less in number than I originally thought and it just SHOWS ME how TRULY isolated he was and how incredibly dangerous a position he was in". Very true.

    ReplyDelete
  80. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  81. Bonnie,
    Thanks for answering my question.

    I'm glad to hear that my email address is safe.

    I never really got into facebook or twitter.

    So it was no biggy when I deleted my page.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Lady,
    Thanks for posting Sam's comments.

    But reading them was so boring, I almost fell asleep.

    Thanks anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  83. I make this suggestion FIRST and foremost because of Jesus, The Prince of Peace, and second, because of Michael, a child of God like all of us. He was an idealist, he was inclusive, he was open and he wanted to break down divisions and encourage peace.

    I know this would go against the research you've already done, but I hope that you and this Samantha person will actually communicate with each other directly. What would this accomplish? To be honest, I don't know, but sometimes direct, private communication can open doors and perhaps clear up possible misunderstandings. Michael was victimized and misunderstood for much of his life because people didn't want to take the time to understand him or believe him when he spoke the truth. Please, please, let's not do this to others. I'm becoming heartsick over this...:-(

    I do agree with Samantha that Stephanie's phone number and address, if they were posted by accident, should be removed.

    I'm praying sincerly for peace in all this. It has to start somewhere first. Can it be here?

    ReplyDelete
  84. @ Bonnie: I agree it looks longer than what it was but, there is only so much room here on your blog comment area that is allowed, so I was forced to break it all down. (Boos...hisses...and no...it's not your fault. It's Blogger's.)

    @ Mimi: "Do you know why? You don’t know how much it breaks my heart to see Michael’s fans divided like this. What can be done to restore this Lady?"

    I don't know how to fix the ailments of Michael's fanbase, unfortunately. BUT...I do know one thing, Bonnie's on the RIGHT path. Those opposing her are obviously on and blindly following the side of "Team Sony/Branca" and the truly sad thing is that they have NO IDEA just how ugly that side of the fence is. They should ask Michael!!! Oh yeah...they can't. He's DEAD!!! :(

    But...I will say this: Michael is SCREAMING loud and clear from the ethers of the other end of life. "Let those who have eyes, see...let those who have ears, hear." So, I am on no other side than Team MICHAEL, and all of those who hang in there with Bonnie throughout all the trials and tribulations of truth-seeking and exposure of the fakes and deceitful.

    All else is "smoke." The fire is on the side of Team Sony/Branca. It's time to expose it for what it is. Bottom line...

    ReplyDelete
  85. Sandy K said:

    I'm praying sincerely for peace in all of this.
    It has to start somewhere first. Can it be here?
    _______________________________________________
    Josie said: I will leave that decison to Bonnie because this is her blog.

    ReplyDelete
  86. SandyK,

    But if you want my opinion on whether we should try and make peace or not I say:

    You can't make peace with Frauds unless they come clean and admit they are Frauds.

    I doubt that will ever happen with Sam.

    So Bonnie Cox.....Expose Them One And All!!

    ReplyDelete
  87. SandyK - Oh, that's okay. Don't worry, I do that all the time. :o)

    {{{{{{{Mimi}}}}}}} Touched your heart . . . broke mine. :o((( Good Lord.

    SandyK - Stephanie's emails and contact info were removed earlier today. In regard to Sammy, how Am I supposed to "make peace" with someone denies she defrauded? I can forgive anything but the pictures were what they were. I cannot change what she has done. I can only change what I have done. Am I supposed to lie and say the picture was not photo shopped? Or lie and say she didn't post implications of Jermaine and Tohme being involved in hurting Michael? I'm supposed to deny what she put in print?

    If it were about me, I wouldn't care . . . but we are supposed to be fighting for Michael, not for this group or that group or Sam or TINI or Taaj or anyone else.

    TINI's sole purpose is to build a public image of AEG to Michael's fans, JUST LIKE SONY DID WITH MICHAEL before they moved in for the kill in 2005 with that trial.

    The emails I recieved from Yazmeen are very revealing and since she mentions my family and my children in them, I should probably post them because that woman is disturbed.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Bonnie said, "TINI's sole purpose is to build a public image of AEG to Michael's fans, JUST LIKE SONY DID WITH MICHAEL before they moved in for the kill in 2005 with that trial."

    I say, "BINGO!!!" And...that goes for all those who are their blind followers and puppets. Every last one of them.

    ReplyDelete
  89. SandyK,

    I don't think you realize what kind of people we are dealing with here.

    These people are dangerous and will stop at nothing to get what they want.

    They already proved that by Murdering Michael.

    Bonnie, if Yazmeen is threatening your family tell your attorney or the police.

    Cover your back Bonnie and do be careful.

    ReplyDelete
  90. Lady, I loved that comment you made about eyes that see and ears that hear. That is one of the most poignant verses in the Bible, used in several different places.

    I hope nobody from this blog is going over there to attack anyone (twitter or facebook posts or Karen's blog). I don't think anyone posting here would, but if anyone is thinking about it, please don't. This is to be expected and it matters not what they say. We know the truth.

    The psychological tactic they are taking is they are not addressing the issue, they are instead ridiculing and attacking the PERSON/PEOPLE to detract from the issue. This is to get people sidetracked into circular arguments.

    Best advice I can give is to keep doing what you are doing and don't engage. It is pointless.

    Lady thank you for posting Sam's note or whatever . . . Twitter. You can see by reading it what her aim is: The same mantra . . . anyone calling her out or disagreeing with her is "jealous", which doesn't address the issue, only ridicules the intended recipient "to elict a prescribed response." (latter part, Patrick Swayze, Roadhouse. I love that line!)

    ReplyDelete
  91. Hi Josie - I'm covered. Have cops that live right across the street from me. People have been "notified" and God has my back. (and front)

    ReplyDelete
  92. @ Bonnie: YW for the Bible quote. I remember my catechism. :) Anyway, I definitely feel it would be something that Michael would indeed be screaming from the "other side" right now, and I can't say that I would blame him. I'm doing the same thing!

    ReplyDelete
  93. I don't know what to say about this, this is so messed up and confusing, so much info, how can you sort thru this stuff and come to these conclusions? Who the hell is this Stephanie? She must be a person trying to get stuff from you and use you, or can even be a person investigating just for info they can use. But this is stupid, Hulya was never at the court on August 23rd, please there must be so much more misinformation here, I'm just speechless.

    ReplyDelete
  94. @Bonnie,

    Karen is now weighing in on this. She is backing up Samantha's photo's with photo's of her own, including a photo of the girls Michael kept on his make-up stand. Samantha was aquainted with Michael and he with her and her friends. That is a fact.

    Karen says that she is tired of fans bashing fans. She is right!!!

    On the photo issue, Samantha could very well be due an apology herself now.

    ReplyDelete
  95. ALL fans need to come together inorder to achieve justice for Michael.

    Like you said, Bonnie, we're supposed to be fighting for Michael, not for different fan groups. I do not speak for them but I'm sure Karen and Samantha would agree on this too. I think we would ALL agree on this.

    If anyone has mistated facts, it is right to challange that, but it needs to be done respectfully, even if the other person, whoever that is, is not being respectful. For the most part you have done that Bonnie, but this Samantha/Karen thing has gotten out of hand and is a distraction from the real issue.

    Remember, Sony and company are watching all this too and are probably giddy with joy that this kind of back and forth between fans is going on. The less attention on them the better in their minds I'm sure.

    I'm looking forward to getting back to the real issue!

    Focus on what unites, not on what divides!!

    Love to ALL fans!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  96. @Bonnie
    I´m so sorry but i don´t see the connection between Sam, Karen and Sony...
    Sometimes is more simple than we think; in my opinion there are two sides opened here for the truth...maybe we can close them and begun to fight for the truth together...
    I´m not on Sam´s or Karen´s side, i have several months reading, observing and learning!! and you are one source that i respect a lot for your interesting way of make me think...but now, i think that someone (real or abstract) is diverting attention..
    I´m agree with Sandy K ( please let me quot you Sandy):
    Focus on what unites, not on what divides!!

    ReplyDelete
  97. I'm really surprised that people still don't get the importance of this issue.

    I saw Karen's pics and have read her defense of her friends. Those photos she has posted prove nothing.

    The 1st one (not great quality) is here:
    http://twitpic.com/2mvzf9 - captioned "Here is a photo I took from my car after rehearsal. I was behind MJ. I had to wait while he talked to them"

    It is people gathered at the side of a car, she says is Michael's car. All car doors and windows are closed, driver's foot on the brakes. Can you make out who the people are that Karen claims are the very fans who have posted the photos in question? I can't, it's the backs of a group, you can only see the face of one person from a distance. After rehearsal? Wouldn't that have been in the early hours? This photo is daylight, looks like dusk.

    The 2nd one (it's hazy and blurry) is here:
    http://twitpic.com/2mvu35 - captioned "Here is the photo that Michael kept with him on the makeup table in the last weeks of his life.He loved these girls"

    Has Michael ever publicly shown that photo and said he kept it on his makeup table (why only in the last weeks of his life?), that he loved these girls? Karen's words are no proof, it's heresay.

    Once again, as we have seen so often since his passing, statements that Michael is not here to verify.

    ReplyDelete
  98. Sam said:

    Who cares whether you think I’m a fraud, let it be your belief and move on.

    I’ve had my share of fans I’ve met or seen online claiming they knew him.

    I don’t ask for proof if they have none, and if they do, I don’t go and investigate their every claim or try to discredit them for the simple reason that I have no reason to.

    I’m happy for anyone who got to meet him and experience the Magic! Good for them!

    And If it’s a lie then it’s really not my problem either.
    ________________________________________________
    Josie said:

    What Sam doesn't seem to understand is Bonnie is "Investigating" the murder of Michael Jackson.

    When you investigate, you must look into anything that looks suspicious. That includes photos.

    That is what Bonnie did and she found out that the photos are Fake.

    It's that simple.

    ReplyDelete
  99. Bonnie said:

    Hi Josie - I'm covered. Have cops that live right across the street from me. People have been "notified" and God has my back. (and front)

    ________________________________________________

    Josie said:

    I'm glad you are covered Bonnie.

    It's always best to take precautions cos, you never know what might happen.
    ________________________________________________

    Truthbtold2all,

    You are so right. This is a very important issue. It's an "Investigation" of MJ's MURDER!

    Sam is trying to water-down that fact that she is a Fraud.

    We are NOW all on to her and we will be watching closely in the future, for anything else that looks Suspicious!

    That's called "Investigating" and Bonnie does it BEST!

    ReplyDelete
  100. We are not here to support the popular groups who claim to know Michael or work for him and have no genuine intention to fight for truth to bring justice for him. If some groups know him personally or work for him and they are about spreading the truth, that is absolutely fine and we should welcome that by any means. But some groups deceiving fans using any means necessary to draw as many fans possible to their side is pure cruelty, in my opinion.

    You know fans love to talk and get close to anybody claiming they know Michael personally or they were friend with him or work with him. Nobody should take advantage of using the vulnerability of fans to get close to someone who knows Michael.

    I know this with firsthand experience when I was in Los Angeles for the anniversary be it at the cemetery, Neverland or any place where fans gathered. If someone said I know Michael personally, tons of people gathered and surrounded that person asking all sort of questions and make he/she an instant celebrity. Fans didn’t have any clue whether the person(s) claim to be friend or acquaintance or work with Michael or not, they just trust the person(s) and their face lighting up by the mere fact this person(s) claim to know Michael.

    That’s why these popularity seeking groups do using fans vulnerability to build their followers by feeding them misleading informations that has nothing to do for fighting for justice. This kind of game need to stop and need to be exposed if the fight for justice to continue.

    ReplyDelete
  101. Thanks Josie. :o)

    Mesrak ~ Thank you for sharing your experience, that sure helps me understand how certain fans gather a following. How pathetic!

    ReplyDelete
  102. Oh good grief...The issue of Sam and pals won't die will it? Who really cares about a bunch of photos? Who cares if she and pals knew Michael or not? Who cares who Karen Faye sticks up for? All that this whole thing does is serve the purposes of dividing the fanbase and create more smoke which in turn makes it all harder to deal with the core issue. The core issue is WHO KILLED MICHAEL?

    I don't care who knew Michael and who didn't. I don't care about "popularity" and the riding on shirt-tails to puff up my ego or to make me feel more important. I DO care about WHO KILLED MICHAEL. I'll leave the drama to the fools...

    ReplyDelete
  103. I suggest you read this http://www.voiceseducation.org/
    words and violence

    Remember - it's one thing to speculate around the dinner table - it is another to do it on the internet. I'm just saying - it's a slippery slope with sensationalism, blogging, blame without absolute complete information. If you put a mistake / untruth on the internet it doesn't matter how many times you go back and say you made a mistake, the untruth has traveled around the world. Question and apply critical thinking to all information you receive.
    Just my 2 cents.

    ReplyDelete
  104. Mimi said: "I know this with firsthand experience when I was in Los Angeles for the anniversary be it at the cemetery, Neverland or any place where fans gathered. If someone said I know Michael personally, tons of people gathered and surrounded that person asking all sort of questions and make he/she an instant celebrity. Fans didn’t have any clue whether the person(s) claim to be friend or acquaintance or work with Michael or not, they just trust the person(s) and their face lighting up by the mere fact this person(s) claim to know Michael."

    The whole thing with this is simply, EVERYONE on this planet knew Michael in some way, shape, or form. Even ME and I never had the pleasure of actual physical contact. I DID see him in concert though, but that's not enough to qualify as a "personal encounter/meeting" I think. I DID have the pleasure of watching him grow up-- in fact, I grew up at the same time, although he was 4 yrs. ahead of me in age. I watched him become the awesome performer and the beautiful person he was, and I also watched him be torn apart and ultimately destroyed.

    I guess my point in all of this is simply, why do Michael's fans feel the need to behave like sheep, and follow people (many of which are celebs, makeup artists, clothing designers, and the like) of people who allegedly knew him far better than the general public? WHY??? What purpose does it truly serve??? Does it help solve the issue of who killed Michael? The correct answer is NO.

    Another thing here is that if all those people truly knew and loved Michael, WHERE were many of them in '93? Even worse...where were they in 2005??? And, lastly...where were they on June 25, 2009??? Good questions, I think. If all of these people knew Michael was ill and frail, why didn't they intervene??? Why didn't they blow whistles THEN??? Not now...but THEN when it all truly mattered??? They were afraid? They were not listened to? Well gee...that alone should have been enough cause to get Michael the heck some help. DUH!!! But no...instead, they kept their mouths shut, and turned a blind eye to what was all happening right underneath their very eyes and noses. That too is SHAMEFUL. Bottom line...

    Pardon my "rant" here, but I needed to air this out. I have no disrespect for these people in spite of their own varied degrees of negligence in the care of their friend, Michael. Sometimes, people get scared...they get confused as to what to do, and I get that. But, are these people worthy of the "worship" of Michael's fans? NO. They are clearly just as human and mortal as everyone else on this planet. If they were gods...Michael may still be amongst us, but they clearly are not gods, and therefore unworthy of the worshipping going on simply because THEY knew Michael.

    As for Sam and her followers, I too could care less. Photoshopped photos or not. But, the bashing of people who do not bow down and worship her or hang on her every "truth" is another matter. The constant and public feud between two sectors of Michael's fanbase (just watch the fireworks on Twitter between the two-- and I'm sure many of you know whom I'm referring to) is also shameful, and does NOTHING to help the fight for justice for Michael any more than it helps the solidarity of Michael's fanbase no matter what the reason(s). All that does is rip it to shreds as well. In any case, these are all lovely examples of why Michael's fans get insulted by the Media. HELLO??? Can anyone else see that outside of me? I would certainly hope so. But yet...in the same time, we're all screaming "justice for Michael". Yeah...right...and we're supposed to be taken seriously. HA!!! We're thought of as a bunch of idiots, and gee...it's not hard to figure or see why.

    ReplyDelete
  105. I totally agree with IMJ99,
    Its time to move forward. We all need to remember: rise above the pettiness, remain open minded and think outside the box because its all about L.O.V.E....

    Truth Is Freedom

    ReplyDelete
  106. To Lady and Mimi,

    I understand you being upset with all this drama between fans.

    But the issue is still important.

    The issue being to separate The Fan Clubs from The Investigating Groups.

    On one side you have The Fan Clubs.

    People wanting popularity and their 15 minutes of fame because they knew Michael in some capacity.

    The other side you have The Investigating Group,
    that's us with Bonnie being the major investigator trying to get Justice For Michael.


    The Goals of these 2 groups IS Different!

    One is for Popularity the other for Justice.

    If people would understand that, then they will understand WHY all the drama and bashing are taking place.

    It's part of the process of Investigating. Bonnie has said this many times over, already.

    Whenever you Expose a Fraud...you must Expect all HELL to break loose.

    That is what has happened here and what has happened here IS Important!

    We need to address this "Hell" for at least 2 reasons.

    1. To let the Frauds know we will not back down
    and we will NOT SHUT-UP!

    2. To let the Frauds know we are on to them and
    will let the rest of the world know as well.

    3. To let the Frauds know we will continue on
    until this case is solved.

    These are important reasons and issues. The Frauds need to know that we are not afraid and that they (Frauds) cannot and will not get away with this.

    Bonnie will begin a New Topic on her Next Blog.

    But for now, we will address "The Bashing" and stand our ground. We will NOT Be Bullied!

    Also reason number

    3. To let everyone make a Choice. Who's side
    are you on?

    1. The Fans Club

    2. The Investigating Group

    3. Neither Not Interested in Michael At All

    ReplyDelete
  107. Sorry I got my numbers mixed up.

    Total Reasons = 4. not 3.

    Sorry

    ReplyDelete
  108. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  109. @ Josie: I agree with you, and don't worry about the mix-up of the numbering. Your point is well made.

    Karen has taken it to her Twitter to agree with the bashing of Bonnie and this blog site. That's her choice. However, I have to question her display of the photos in an attempt to claim "truth?" Ok...the girls were there. BIG deal. Am I now to stand on my head and shoot out sparks??? Is any one of us??? I don't think so.

    BUT...having another look at the photos posted that were supposedly photoshopped, and also having noticed that Karen's photos were taken at dusk (at least that's what it appears to be). The alleged photoshopped photos posted by Sam, et. al. seem to have been taken later, after dark!!! How is such possible, when Karen's photos clearly show Michael's Escalade (with Michael in it--according to Karen's account) LEAVING? Now noting her own words: "Here is a photo I took from my car after rehearsal. I was behind MJ. I had to wait while he talked to them" in reference to the photo link: http://twitpic.com/2mvzf9

    To those who saved copies take a good look again at Sam's photo. Where's the "dusk" in that photo, or any of the others??? You won't find it. "Dusk" is nowhere to be found, or indicated in ANY of those photos.

    Hmm...this draws yet more questions, then doesn't it? WHEN were Sam and pals' photos taken? Was there yet another visit they made perhaps? From the way it looks when you compare, Sam's photo was likely NOT taken the same night that Karen's were. So I have to ask...WHY would Karen defend these people with photos of her own??? It's a curious situation, for sure. But, in any case do as you will. I for one don't care about that entire issue, and I am also tired of addressing it. I care about who killed Michael, and that's what I am here for.

    ReplyDelete
  110. @Lady,

    Thank You for addressing my post.

    I Agree with you.

    ReplyDelete
  111. Bonnie,
    I know this is not important but you spelled the title wrong in part 4 5 and 6.

    Slippery has 2 P's in it.

    You might want to correct it.

    I'm sure "SOME" are having a laugh about it.

    ReplyDelete
  112. I must say, Karen has me baffled.

    We all know she was MJ's makeup artist.

    Why is she backing Sam?

    ReplyDelete
  113. Would Karen side with a Fake just to get back at Bonnie?

    ReplyDelete
  114. I guess that Karen must be VERY HURT by the mistake made about her.

    This is so sad.

    ReplyDelete
  115. I can understand it must be hard to:

    "NOT BE SPECIAL" anymore.



    With MJ gone, Karen will soon be forgotten.

    This fan club may be her last chance to keep her name remembered.

    After 30 years of being Special, she must be going through "Celebrity Withdrawls."

    That may be why she is with Sam.

    That's my opinion, anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  116. Josie- we all make mistake and its okay to make one as long as you accept and you understand your mistake and extend your apology. That’s what exactly Bonnie did to Karen, and Karen should accept her apology because it’s sincere. But if she doesn’t, guess what, it’s not going to hurt Bonnie because she already released it, but it’s going to hurt Karen because she is the one who is caring it inside her. If you don’t forgive others, the pain is in you not on the other person(s). I believe one day Karen will realize and forgive her for her own sake to gain her peace.

    However, if I were Karen, from the beginning, I wouldn’t have open myself to Michael’s fans through social networking that can be subject to scrutiny, controversy, and everything. I will continue cherish the beautiful moments I had with him as his employee, and not involve too much with his fans. I know some people will disagree but if I were her that’s what I would have done.

    ReplyDelete
  117. @Josie,

    I agree with you concerning your point about different fan groups. Some are just about popularity and others want to investigate Michael's death in some meaningful way. I feel that Bonnie has most definitely contributed to that in a meaningful way. I applaud her for that effort. Like you, I personally have no interest in groups that are just about popularity. The shallowness of such an endeavor is obvious to everyone I'm sure.

    I've known about Karen (I've never met her) since the late 80's from interviews she has done. There aren't very many. I've become much more familiar with her in the last 14 months and feel she is an honorable person and deeply cares about Michael. I very much doubt that she is trying to "get back at Bonnie" or is somehow "very hurt" by the mistake made about her. With all do respect to you Josie, I sincerely feel that too much is being read into her comments. Everything she says gets picked apart and micro-analyzed for the slightest hint of anything that's less than honorable. When she says she's speaking the truth, it's assumed that she's less than truthful. This is the very same thing Michael endured for decades, and of course his situation was worse. We all know he had to endure abuse from international media on a much larger, and more sickening scale. It continues to boggle my mind how many of those so-called "journalists" were able to sleep at night with the crap they were printing about him.

    I don't know why Karen is backing Sam. I can only imagine that she sees her being attacked and wants to help her and let her know she's not being abandoned. It's hard for me to comment about Samantha. Too many unknowns to go with the knowns. I do feel confident about Karen and no I'm not trying to win any popularity contests. I know I'm not going to change your mind. I wish I could. I respect your opinion though.

    ReplyDelete
  118. @Josie,

    "After 30 years of being Special, she must be going through "Celebrity Withdrawls.""

    Michael was her boss, yes, but he was also a friend. She's experiencing the loss of a friend, not the loss of a celebrity. You don't interact with someone for 27 years and not develope a friendship with that person. Karen has other clients, including celebrity clients.

    ReplyDelete
  119. MichaelPureSoul - I know about Hulya, I said her group. And remember this is what Taaj and Stephanie testified to, to me. It was Taaj's phone conversations with me that prompted me not to trust her, but I still think she is being used. She's not researching, but it bothers me that she would tell me and others that she was working with the Jackson family, then turn around and as ME to apologize to Randy Jackson for something she did on Twitter. I never even saw those Twitters! And the only time I have EVER contacted Randy Jackson was through Snail mail and I believe once or twice through twitter. I have no contact with them, only with REAL people that have been around them. The ones that don't bother with the Facebook and Twitter battlegrounds.

    Anyhow, welcome aboard! It is confusing! I just posted the new blog with information about TINI'S "HUMBLE" origins.

    ReplyDelete
  120. @Mesrak (Mimi),

    "However, if I were Karen, from the beginning, I wouldn’t have open myself to Michael’s fans through social networking that can be subject to scrutiny, controversy, and everything."

    I do agree with you here. Social networking can be great but can also add a layer of complexity that can be awkward and difficult to manage.

    BTW, is it alright to ask in what capacity you were employed with Michael? I respect that you may not wish to reveal this. I celebrate your experiences with Michael as his employee...:-)...:-)...:-)

    ReplyDelete
  121. @Josie:

    You are making me laugh so much. I love your analogy. Hey, there is a possibility that one can feel the withdrawal symptoms in almost everything. Believe me if I were his employee for decades and he is gone now, I would have sever withdrawal symptoms, are you kidding me?

    Would I involve with his fans not to feel my pain? NO, NO, NO!!!!!!

    If I were her, I would involve in fighting to bring justice for him by getting the truth out, because I love him so much. Remember I am his makeup artist for years and I must know something the average people don’t know.

    ReplyDelete
  122. SandyK - I appreciate you posting that over here. I have not seen the picture. Karen has another issue to address and she knows what it is. Something she asked me to do back at the end of last year. I had told her I didn't feel it was right and that was that, but it stuck with me. Now with all this going on, I want to know why the DISTRACTION away from Sony and toward AEG. Especially now with TINI having a connection to Sony. Who is financing TINI and that web hosting? Why were web pages pulled down if I am so off base?

    Well?

    As far as the picture is concerned, I am NOT going to apologize because THAT PICTURE OF SAMMY is photo shopped. I don't know anything about any other pictures because they didn't exist anywhere until what, today? So until I see those I cannot comment on them.

    ReplyDelete
  123. SandyK - I also agree with you on uniting. But Sammy was and has not done that. She has treated people terribly. The fights that broke out on Karen's page had nothing to do with me. The previous fights that broke out on Sammy's page had nothing to do with me. Common denominator? Samantha. I would love it if people would stop lying. But I can't have everything. (shrugs)

    meigadas - I agree with you, but others do not want harmony. The reason this whole things started was because I pointed out the way people were treated on THEIR pages. The photo issue was a freak discovery. If someone is lying I am not backing down. I can't.

    ReplyDelete
  124. @Bonnie,

    I think the Samantha issue still confuses me. I was never on Karen's FB page or Samantha's so on one hand I'm gald I didn't see the fights, on the other hand, there is a side of this story that I haven't experienced.

    Pic's posted on Karen's twitter concerning Samantha. She is recognizable in both pictures:

    "Here is a photo I took from my car after rehearsal. I was behind MJ. I had to wait while he talked to them"
    http://twitpic.com/2mvzf9

    "Here is the photo that Michael kept with him on the makeup table in the last weeks of his life.He loved these girls" http://twitpic.com/2mvu35

    ReplyDelete
  125. @SandyK

    What I meant by Celebrity Withdrawls was

    NOT ABOUT MICHAEL as a Celebrity.



    It was about Karen BEING A Celebrity

    for working for Michael.

    She was living the life of a Celebrity because she worked with MJ for 30 years!

    Now he is gone and she feels people..........

    WILL FORGET HER!

    That is Celebrity Withdrawl for HER
    as the Celebrity!

    ReplyDelete
  126. Mimi,
    You may be the only person who understood what I meant by "Celebrity Withdrawl."

    Yes, you are right.

    Karen hooking up with the Fans was NOT a good way to compensate for her loss of "Feeling Special."

    I had hoped she would have done what Bonnie is doing, instead.

    ReplyDelete
  127. @Bonnie,

    "Who is financing TINI and that web hosting? Why were web pages pulled down if I am so off base?

    Well?"

    Your question is excellent! It deserves to be answered. I remember the TINI sight going up before the movie came out last year. In fact, the site was even mentioned on news outlets such as CNN. That publicity I'm sure led many to the site that otherwise wouldn't have known about it. At the time, it appeared that a group of "fans" was protesting the release of a movie that would present a false picture of Michael's last days. As has been observed, the design of the site seemed like some money had been put into it. I'm very much looking forward to your observations on this issue!

    ReplyDelete
  128. @Josie,

    Thanks for clarifying the "celebrity" issue you brought up. I mis-understood.

    ReplyDelete
  129. truthbtold2all - Thank you truth . . . I am looking at them now. In the first photo of them by a car, I can see what LOOKS like Sammy, but this is not conclusive as we have no idea who is in the SUV. Same with the other picture. Karen says it was on Michael's dresser. A picture of a picture. If I put evidence like that up there I would get laughed off the blog.

    ReplyDelete
  130. @Josie,

    "I had hoped she would have done what Bonnie is doing, instead."

    Bonnie is very good at investigating a story and engaging others to assist in that investigation. Karen is very good at sharing her experiences with Michael over the last 27 years and how that experience has helped her grow as an individual. Of course we all grow through our relationships with others. Her accounts have been heartwarming, real and uplifting. They are personal, but NOT intrusive stories about Michael. Karen is sharing the true Michael that she knew. I feel that what she is doing is just as important as what Bonnie is doing. Both Karen and Bonnie want the truth about Michael to be known. Bonnie wants to expose the ugliness of his death. Karen wants to expose the beauty of his life. Both are critical stories to be told and both work toward realizing justice for Michael, wouldn't you agree?? (I very much hope you do.)

    ReplyDelete
  131. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  132. @Bonnie,

    "In the first photo of them by a car, I can see what LOOKS like Sammy, but this is not conclusive as we have no idea who is in the SUV. Same with the other picture. Karen says it was on Michael's dresser. A picture of a picture. If I put evidence like that up there I would get laughed off the blog."

    I see your point but I feel that Karen is being genuine with these pictures. I will respectfully agree to disagree with you on this one.

    ReplyDelete
  133. @SandyK
    Your Welcome on the Celebrity issue.

    I was afraid it might be misunderstood.

    As for Karen exposing MJ life and Bonnie, MJ death...I understand and I agree.

    But Karen is now with a known Fraud (Sam).

    So I can only conclude that Karen has a Whole Other Side to her that we know nothing about.

    And I personally am disappointed in Karen.

    I use to think she was so cool the way she did Michael's hair and make-up. I was impressed with her back then.

    But not anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  134. SandyK, I agree with both your comments directly above, as I too believe Karen is sharing her memories of times with Michael in a compassionate, nonintrusive way that we would not otherwise know, and that Bonnie is investigating the circumstances surrounding Michael's death, not the "prettiest" job in the world but as you say, critical to obtaining justice. Both have their valuable contributions. And I also agree that Karen's sharing of the pix is genuine on her part.

    ReplyDelete
  135. Bonnie there are many more pictures with other fan followers from the same day, same outfit, they each have their own picture to prove it.

    ReplyDelete
  136. Pic's posted on Karen's twitter concerning Samantha. She is recognizable in both pictures: - I did recognize Sam in the one picture. What I did NOT recognize was MICHAEL in either picture.

    What part of "with Michael" do they not understand? I've seen enough of the backs of Cadillac SUV's on her videos to want to know who was really inside. I'm sorry, but if I go out and take a picture of myself beside a Cadillac Escalade and say Michael was inside, are they going to believe me? No. So Why should I just take their word after finding a photo shopped picture?

    She's trying . . . I'll give her that, but I'm really, really disappointed.

    ReplyDelete
  137. SandyK - "Your question is excellent! It deserves to be answered. I remember the TINI sight going up before the movie came out last year. In fact, the site was even mentioned on news outlets such as CNN. "

    I had joined the site, but never went back to it (don't know why, too overwhelmed at first I think). Someone else, somewhere posted a link about it being on CNN. Yet, it was Karen Faye and MLB, not Sam or this group of Fan-Followers that ever got interviewed on major news networks. (unless I missed something. I've been all over youtube about this).

    Also, I wanted to reiterate before things get out of hand . . . the belittling of Karen at this point, any sarcastic remarks, if we could not do that (my reminder too) because we do NOT know why she is doing this yet. I have problems with it, it does not seem very genuine what she is doing, but I don't want to make any remarks beyond that. I don't hate these people, only what they are doing.

    Thank you and I love you! SandyK, I thank you for disagreeing in the classiest of manner<3

    ReplyDelete
  138. SandyK - "Bonnie wants to expose the ugliness of his death. Karen wants to expose the beauty of his life. Both are critical stories to be told and both work toward realizing justice for Michael, wouldn't you agree?? (I very much hope you do.) "

    Yes, I do agree very much. Thank you for posting that.

    ReplyDelete
  139. MichaelPureSoul - I'm not doubting they exist. I'm not doubting they "followed". I am however severely shocked and beyond disappointed, disgusted, whatever you want to call it, of the photo-shopped pictures. They were unnecessary to her story. Any of these other pictures near an SUV or outside the Staples Center, or snapping pics of Mike as he got out of a car going into court, etc . . . (which could have been gotten by anyone in the press on those days).

    Why would someone need to market a photo-shopped picture of themselves and Michael to convince people? Add the heavy-handedness in which she treated people and top it off with a fan-follower website with expensive, professional design on servers and hosting supplied by a company serving multi-billion dollar corporations and the same that hosts and manages Sony's, Universal Pictures, ABC, NBC and Warner Bros AND they get coverage on CNN before TII even comes out?

    Just how far down do you want me to pull the wool over my eyes?

    ReplyDelete
  140. Michaelpuresoul - I would also like to point out that NONE OF THOSE OTHER PICS show them "WITH" Michael. Lots of other people have pics of Michael they took from a distance.

    Right now my concern is not even Samantha . . . it's TINI and it's REAL origins.

    ReplyDelete
  141. Michaelpure soul. If you are talking about the individuals who are posed WITH Michael, I have two of the other ones . . . a brunette and a guy who looks like somebody shocked him. They were both photo shopped too. I did not get the other ones. I'm sorry. Sammy's, the brunette girl and the guy are the only ones sent to me and you can see where images were layered in and someone needs to learn how to do shadows.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.