Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: October 10, 2010 - Michael and Arnie Klein Meet Again

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Sunday, October 10, 2010

October 10, 2010 - Michael and Arnie Klein Meet Again

Michael and Arnie Klein, Back Together Again?



A fine, upstanding bunch of citizens, aren't they?

Just in case there are some who will come here and read this blog, believing that Arnie Klein does indeed know my brother, take note of the user ID above which will be used to trace this user.  1196689335124.  Of course the profile no longer exists, but we know how to find them anyway.

I also wanted to note that for a dermatologist, Klein appears to have gone a bit heavy with the skin abrasion for his profile picture as it removed all his pigment, hair and features as well.  Either that or Klein allowed TINI access to his file of profile pics on Facebook to alter and photo shop as they please.  Just one piece of advice . . . Arnie, you need some time in the sun . . . just a little.  And find your eyes, because that's just spooky.

Now are we to deduct from this latest juvenile maneuver that TINI is telling the truth?  I guess this restores all faith from people who were on the fence about them?  Yeah . . . I thought so.

Is calling me names supposed to send me packing?  (Are these people in third grade?)

Is contacting my brother supposed to intimidate me?  No, all it managed to do, again, is prove exactly who and what these people are.

Samantha, Taaj, Karen, Talitha and the rest of you lot-lizards are doing such a good job proving how right everyone is about your character, I may not even have to mention you again on this blog.  You keep making my job so easy!  Maybe if you spent more time paying attention to detail when photoshopping or altering film instead of terrorizing Michael and his children by trying to be his fabric lint, we wouldn't keep finding these mistakes of yours!

You should be thanking me!  Consider it constructive criticism.

Does bringing my son into this (who does NOT have autism by the way, he as Asperger's) convince anyone reading this that THESE are the people Michael trusted with HIS children?  I think not.

Congratulations TINI and Co.  You have just succeeded in eliminating what slim element of integrity you had.     And I would expect nothing less from a Sony source.

If I am the liar, why are THEY the ones hiding?

They infiltrated my Facebook page only to realize that I don't do my work on Facebook, I do it on my blog.  I won't allow them to cause trouble here, so they go back to Facebook and start emailing my family.  My brother called me and read it to me.  At first I laughed, then told him to email the screenshot to me, so he did.  (By the way, my brother does not know who Arnie Klein is, just in case anyone is wondering)..

I'm curious as to what they expect me to do as a result of this?  Curl up and forget the whole thing?  Sorry but the truth doesn't run.  It just stands still while the liars try to spin webs around it. When people start  realizing that truth has not moved, they'll choose the solid ground over shifting sand.

In the meantime my plans have not changed.  Michael is still being lied about by these people and their dirty tactics, and innocent people are being harassed and victimized, including members of the Jackson Family who did NOTHING to them.

Sony took their car away now that there is no one to follow and they don't get as much mileage out of Facebook as they did following Michael.

Michael During Trial, Getting the Camera Out of His Face


My suggestion to everyone who reads this, if you are a member of my facebook page, change your privacy settings so people cannot access your friend's list.  I am not closing my facebook page down.  I'm not the one in the wrong and all TINI and thugs will succeed in doing is further supporting my position.

I bet most of you never saw this coming 12 months ago.

I'm sorry if anyone who reads this has been harassed because of this.  Consider the source and don't engage them.  Just report them and keep your nose to the truth.  Remember Michael kept right on walking no matter how close they got.  He did not let them stop him from doing what he needed to do.

God Bless you and have a great weekend.

Michael Witnessed God's truth . . . not Samantha's, Not Karen's, Not TINI's

86 comments:

  1. Thought you all would like to see this.

    Truthbtold - This is for you. This is not political this is criminal.

    ReplyDelete
  2. @ Bonnie: Luv the photo of MJ w/the little girl. That is sweet! As for the "esteemed" (cough...hack...cough) Dr. Arnold Klein-- the same man who has sold "countless whoppers and tall tales" to TMZ and so forth in recent history, one claiming that MJ had a gay relationship with his office assistant (cough...hack...cough), and then the repercussions of that was so bad that he and his gay assistant had to go into hiding, has appeared to come out of hiding to email your brother using Facebook. Yeah...cough...right...

    Hey Dr. Klein!!! Go back to that rock you've been hiding under ever since the Dept. of Justice raided your files on Michael Jackson! Oh, by the way...Dame Elizabeth Taylor just "loves" you...

    Dr. Arnie Klein declared on May 2 that he did not betray Michael Jackson by saying publicly that he had a homosexual relationship 4:57 AM May 13th via web

    with someone in "Arnie's" office. It seems he supplies not only women (Debbie Rowe), but men too...how convenient. 4:59 AM May 13th via web

    Just what we want in our doctors. And then to say he did not betray Michael's confidence. No wonder he has death threats. 5:00 AM May 13th via web

    I thought doctors, like priests took an oath of confidentiality. May God have mercy on his soul. 5:01 AM May 13th via web

    Source: http://twitter.com/DameElizabeth

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bonnie – for a long minutes I sat down and thinking how this person whoever he/she is really losing his/her mind sending this horrible message to your brother.

    This is completely showing how juvenile their life is. To me being Michael Jackson fan means is imitating and living the way he loves and respects his fellow beings. But these so called fans are way too far becoming like Michael, and all they do is distorting the lessons he shared with us.

    No matter how much we disagree, none of us shouldn’t cross the line and insult, call names, and degrade each other’s family under any circumstances.

    Bonnie, I know you’re a strong woman with a strong faith. Keep your faith and know that this too shall pass, and those who lie and deceive will wither away in due time. This is the universal law, and only LOVE wins at the end.

    ReplyDelete
  4. So Bonnie,

    someone from TINI posed as Arnold Klein?

    Your blog needs to be advertised for all the information it holds, and I think there should be a separate website that solely records these people's actions and the timeline.

    Could it be that they were all so Twitter-active today (including KF) because of your second most recent blog post? Considering the intesity of their most recent bashing and tantrums.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bonnie, I'm sorry this has happened and your family has been dragged into it. That's just plain nasty. There are other adjectives as well: childish, vindictive and downright intrusive. There are intelligent ways of communication if they want to disagree with you or rebut what you say. This is just low.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bonnie,

    In other words, this last picture of Michael and the little blonde girl is a PhotoShopped Picture

    Right?

    Yes, it is indeed, criminal!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bonnie,

    All this commotion about Michael just proves to me that he is really gone.

    People just want to cash in on his name, anyway they can.

    It's been over a year now, and all these
    "Lot-Lizards" are still going strong!

    To me, that not only proves that Michael is gone, it proves that he was Murdered.

    Can't they see, the harder they try to sell us their BS, the more guilty they look?!

    I am so proud of you, Bonnie!

    You are a Warrior and Very Intelligent!

    That makes you "Armed & Dangerous" to the enemy.

    I hope you have Lawyers and Attorneys on stand-by in case this gets Ugly.

    God Bless and Keep Up The Good Work!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Where did this picture come from, Bonnie?




    As sick as these people are, they couldn't even get it right.

    They made 1 big mistake with this picture.

    The little girl should have been a little boy.

    May God have Mercy on their Souls!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I take it this was suppose to be your surprise that they thought you couldn't handle.

    Oh how they Under-Estimate you, Bonnie!

    Like I said before, keep pushing their buttons!

    I'm behind you 100% Bonnie!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Bonnie, I don't have a facebook page.

    I don't have a twitter page either.

    I never could get into them.

    But I love the fact that you are not closing
    your facebook page.

    You will not let them scare you away!

    Good For You Bonnie!!

    ReplyDelete
  11. @ Bonnie,

    You called them "Lot-Lizards" and "Fabric Lint."

    I Love It! LOL and...LOL some more!

    I Gotta Tell Ya! ...... I JUST LOVE IT!!

    (((((ROFLMAO)))))

    ReplyDelete
  12. Bonnie - I don't use Facebook (thankfully, hard to keep up with everything without it, but I prefer to sleep at night).

    Is this supposed to be from Arnold Klein to your brother who does not know Arnold Klein? And your brother's name is Michael? Your brother's identity was stolen from your FB page and a phony email sent to your bro who forwarded it to you?

    Yes, this IS criminal.

    Did you see my "CATFISH" comment Saturday on your prior blog subject?

    Take care and God bless.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Bonnie are you serious????? This is beyond childish if not down right retarded....How low will they go is the question to be asked.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Bonnie, the more they display this kind of idiotic and base behavior, the more people will respect what you do! My only concern is that whoever took the time to dream up and carry out this invasive act is exhibiting criminal tendencies and may not know where to draw the line. When they start involving family members against their will, they have crossed that line and it sends up a red flag. Let me know if you would like me to forward what you received to Tom Mesereau. This may be a one time incident, or you could wait to see if something else happens and then I'll send both to TM. They are starting to invade your comfort zone!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Josie said:

    "Bonnie, in other words, this last picture of Michael and the little blonde girl is a PhotoShopped picture, right? As sick as these people are, they couldn't even get it right. They made 1 big mistake with this picture. The little girl should have been a little boy."


    Josie - I think you misunderstood about the photo above - it was not photoshopped. Bonnie posted it to show that Michael witnessed God's truth - not Samantha's, Karen's or TINI. See the caption Bonnie wrote above the photo. It is a beautiful image that speaks to the heart of what we are fighting for - love and truth, as Michael lived it. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  16. @ Bonnie: Regarding my earlier response... I want to make this clear that I don't truly believe that Dr. Klein would email your brother-- a person he doesn't know, simply to play "paid puppet" and harass another person that he also doesn't know any more than I believe that $ONY/Marty Bandier, John Branca, Karen Faye, and TINI are candidates for the sainthood. This smells of Taaj (who has been known for multiple ID's on the net-- that's why there are restraining orders against her from what I've heard) and/or a member of the TINI gang taking orders from Samantha, or perhaps even Karen Faye.

    Yeah...TINI really should be proud to have Taaj on their "team." She does "wonders" for their credibility and reputation! LOL...

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hi Lady - I wanted to double check but you know that the "Arnie Klein" that emailed my brother is not really Arnie Klein, right? My brother is in the process of finding out who it was, not that it matters. I will know shortly where it came from.

    As far as Klein and his assistant go, His assistant's interview was taken out of context and his comments spliced and diced up for television. Jason Pfeiffer never said Michael was his lover. That is what the headline said. I have a blog about this here: http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/07/illusion-escapism-or-something-more.html
    -----------------------------------------------

    Mimi - Thank you very much. What you say is true. You said - "This is completely showing how juvenile their life is. To me being Michael Jackson fan means is imitating and living the way he loves and respects his fellow beings. But these so called fans are way too far becoming like Michael, and all they do is distorting the lessons he shared with us."

    I wanted to also remind people that Michael did not sit back and watch while someone was being lied about or victimized. Michael did more fighting for others then he did for himself. Not only did these people victimize Michael and his children for NO REASON, they injected themselves into the fan base to spread their cancer there.

    It is evident in their behavior what they are and what they stand for. They can't accuse me of anything. I have never sent a hateful comment to anyone via Facebook or Twitter to anyone. I research and report on this blog. If it was not the truth, they wouldn't be carrying on like this. Thank you again Mimi.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Aida - you said "Your blog needs to be advertised for all the information it holds, and I think there should be a separate website that solely records these people's actions and the timeline."

    I am working on the Justice website with a timeline of everything. For right now, the correspondence gets posted as they happen because I've been threatened and I want the evidence of what is going on posted. If they don't like it, maybe they should stop misbehaving?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Bonnie, you said "my brother is in the process of finding out who it was, not that it matters." Respectfully I suggest that it does matter. In addition to your privacy being breached, so was your brother's.

    About Facebook, another item that was publicized today concerned the ability of a FB "friend" to add another "friend" to a FB group without prior notice to the person being added, to which FB replied cavalierly that the one added could always remove themselves; yeah, right, after you are placed in a group you know nothing about by a "friend" who THINKS you may want to be included.

    ReplyDelete
  20. June said - "Is this supposed to be from Arnold Klein to your brother who does not know Arnold Klein? And your brother's name is Michael? Your brother's identity was stolen from your FB page and a phony email sent to your bro who forwarded it to you?"

    "Did you see my "CATFISH" comment Saturday on your prior blog subject?"

    June, this was a phony "Arnie Klein" profile set up to specifically private message my brother. They deactivated the profile as soon as the deed was done. I don't know what the purpose of it was other than to make me roll my eyes, which I did when he called and read it to me. He seemed more tight-lipped about it than I was.

    Yes, I did see your post on the "Catfish" documentary. I want to make it a blog topic.
    ----------------------------------------------

    Miss Shae - "Bonnie are you serious????? This is beyond childish if not down right retarded....How low will they go is the question to be asked."

    Embarrassing for them, isn't it? I wish I wasn't serious but unfortunately there are books out there with half their pages missing and they want to be taken seriously. If you want to know how low they will go, you only have to look to what they did to Michael . . . the lowest has already been done. There is nothing they can do to me that is worse than what they did to him. Thanks to Michael, I know how to handle it.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Spotlight said - "Bonnie, the more they display this kind of idiotic and base behavior, the more people will respect what you do! My only concern is that whoever took the time to dream up and carry out this invasive act is exhibiting criminal tendencies..."

    Tom M. may already know about it but feel free. I'm not sure he's even working on anything to do with the Jackson's other than helping them with things that happened in and around that trial, so I would hate to put him on the spot. For Information purposes though . . . sure. This is something I have to handle on my end. They picked the wrong person to bother, LOL! We'll find out who it is. Thank you for your assistance, Spotlight ♥
    -----------------------------------------------
    Josie, spotlight is right. I always put photos of Michael on this blog as it is about him, his witness and struggles. That picture of Michael with the little girl is just that . . . a picture of his adoration and empathy for all children.

    ReplyDelete
  22. skeptikos - Wow . . .Sony entities will handle this loan renegotiation. Somehow, this smells like a bad thing. I will look into this. Thank you for the info. Anyone else here is also free to look into this and post your opinion.

    Yes, my son reminds me of Michael too, except the shy part. Get him on his chosen topic and he'll talk your ear off! (History)

    ReplyDelete
  23. Bonnie – I checked the blog Skeptikos posted and nothing further stated beyond what he commented. I was hoping the blogger will have links of references where the story originated.

    I don’t think it’s fare for the blogger to post a major news such as Sony/ATV debit re-negotiated to be true without showing us anything to reference.

    Where is this blogger found the news? I checked the topic on the internet nothing I found. So we shouldn’t believe such a news to be true with no evidence to check into if the negotiation really happened.

    writing any blog without showing the source where the story coming from is good for those who fall and believe everything that is written, not for some of us who wants to know the source where the story coming from.

    Please let me know if I am missing something. As far as my checking, I couldn’t find any documents written that says, “Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC has been just renegotiated! According to the documents dated for September 15, 2010 Wells Fargo Bank will handle the debts in a complicated agreement between the two parties and various Sony entities.”

    ReplyDelete
  24. Mimi - I totally agree with you and I am removing the post from Skeptikos until either you or I can find referencing material. I know Skeptikos has been very sympathetic toward the "Branca Blogger" and if we can't reference the info, I am deleting it. Sorry Skeptikos, but I'm not promoting a blog like that.

    ReplyDelete
  25. To be fair in regards to Skeptikos' announcement, the last things I've heard regarding the ATV is:

    Jackson Estate Steers to Next Challenge: Loan Refinancing (this was as of June 21, 2010)
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703438604575315364195884770.html

    Michael Jackson estate decides to keep rights to Beatles songs (June 24, 2010):
    http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700042908/Michael-Jackson-estate-decides-to-keep-rights-to-Beatles-songs.html

    Then there is the "progress report" that the Estate filed (Sept. 22, 2010): https://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0BxaHBrGpwZvhMTU3M2JkMGItZjQyYy00ZDYxLWJmMmQtM2U2MjI1ZTkxZDYw&hl=en&authkey=CJD0pogC

    Michael Jackson Estate Sued by Bahrain Loan Adviser (October 2, 2010):
    ***Article has since been removed but I have it: https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0BxaHBrGpwZvhZWI4NTFhMGEtMTk3MC00NDljLTk2ZjAtMjJlMjFlOTYyNmI0&hl=en&authkey=CJ2N3eEI

    ReplyDelete
  26. Also regarding the Fortress Suit against the Estate, I wish to mention that it is VERY wise to take a screenshot of articles like that. WHY? For some "unknown reason" these articles tend to come up "missing" rather quickly. It couldn't be that the MJ Estate/Branca wants to keep such quiet, now could it? They're the "good guys" now. Yeah, cough...cough...right!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Lady - Right and these articles are relatively old news in regard to the estate loans. They talk about two major loans on this other blog. We know one is the big $300 Mil. loan and this other major loan is what? Colony still has the Neverland loan, what other major loan was out there? There is nothing verifying what this blogger posted about anything being settled or refinanced and if they are posting information before it is even out in the news, where is this informtion coming from? Who's filling them in? That is my point.

    ReplyDelete
  28. @ Bonnie: "There is nothing verifying what this blogger posted about anything being settled or refinanced and if they are posting information before it is even out in the news, where is this informtion coming from? Who's filling them in? That is my point."

    I agree. I too when I'd read Skeptikos' announcement, did a Search, and came up with nothing in reference to such. So, either the Blogger misinterpreted something along the line-- although I too had noted that no references were made to substantiate the Blogger's claim, I have to disregard the information as being untrue. At least so far.

    As far as who(m) the Blogger's source of info is? That IS an interesting question that is worthy of being asked, but I doubt that the Blogger will reveal it-- at the very least, it wouldn't be surprising anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Bonnie – I am glad you remove his comment with that blog he posted that did not show any referencing material to the story. Your blog is mainly where intelligent and truth seeker and farsighted people come together to participate and sort out and educate what’s going on in MJ community; therefore, we need some documented materials to analyze the story.

    I know Skeptikos is a strong supporter of Branca and the blogger and that’s his choice, but he shouldn’t post any major news like that he found from some blog who neglect to reference any documented material for the reader.

    Skeptikos should know better since he used to participate in this blog in the past and what kind of Michael’s fans usually post comments here. He should have researched a little further and find the source himself if there is one and post his finding if the other blogger fail to do so.

    Please Skeptikos in the future make sure you have the source where the news come from before you post here, because this is the blog where intelligent discussion happen and you know that very well.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Lady - Are you saying you have your suspicions as to where the information came from that was posted on that blog? Me too, I just didn't want to say anything. At least not yet. I don't have a problem with Skeptikos posting here, but that kind of information is, or has the potential to be inflammatory and with no references we can't really check the source of information and speculation can run rampant.

    Mimi - Please don't get mad at me, but I almost didn't post your comment because I thought it might be a bit picking on Skeptikos. You are right, they have posted here before, but it is not Skeptikos's fault that the blog they posted here did not post references or links to where they got the info. I only removed it and told Skeptikos why. I don't want to personally vilify someone for something someone else did or didn't do.

    I know where you are coming from and I know you were treated rather shabbily on that other post that Skeptikos comments on, so know that I understand how you feel. We have to try to keep our emotions in check though. Please understand okay? I love you and I just want to be fair to people.

    ReplyDelete
  31. @ Bonnie: "Lady - Are you saying you have your suspicions as to where the information came from that was posted on that blog? Me too, I just didn't want to say anything. At least not yet. I don't have a problem with Skeptikos posting here, but that kind of information is, or has the potential to be inflammatory and with no references we can't really check the source of information and speculation can run rampant."

    Yuppers (in the suspicious department)!!! And, I also agree that it's okay to post information here BUT...there is the necessity for SOURCES to also be listed to verify. Without them, no one should accept them.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Bonnie - I am not mad at you in fact I really appreciate that you pointing out to me what I neglect and go beyond the purpose of your blog. I am so sorry I don’t want to sound like I am picking on anyone who wants to try to contribute. I was just frustrated and trying to make a point if he is posting a major news like that should further investigate and post the news with references if the original blogger neglect to do so. But now I understand that it’s not Skeptikos fault and he was just posting what was written. I shouldn’t make him be responsible for the blog he did not write and find references for the reader.

    I am sorry Skeptikos for making you be responsible for the blog you did not write.

    I am not fond of vilifying anyone too, and I have had that experience and I hate it. I don’t want to be the one who is doing it to others either. Thank you Bonnie for pointing this to me and I am learning.

    ReplyDelete
  33. In other interesting "news" there is today's entry fresh out of TMZ who suspiciously always seems to get the "scoop", but nonetheless, here it is:

    Conrad Murray to Joe Jackson: Objection!!!

    http://www.tmz.com/2010/10/11/conrad-murray-joe-jackson-michael-jackson-leonard-rowe-wrongful-death-katherine-jackson-charles-peckham-brian-oxman/

    Note this (for the benefit of those supporting Rowe): "Peckham also claims there is no proof Rowe ever served as Michael's advisor."

    I want to emphasize clearly the following: "NO PROOF Rowe EVER served as Michael's advisor." So, that quote alone pretty much "buries" Rowe's book and his claims doesn't it? Perhaps. At least for the most part...

    ReplyDelete
  34. Bonnie, I agree that this kind of communication you've posted in the image at the top of this page is totally uncalled for. This person does NOT represent Michael in anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Just for fun...:-)

    Great interview of Michael talking about his career called "Michael Jackson GLIMPSES ( very rare)." This sounds like it was done sometime in the 80's. I love the upbeat youthful enthusiasm in his voice.

    ENJOY!!!

    Source:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oajhM84zHis&feature=player_embedded

    ReplyDelete
  36. @ Spotlight

    Josie said:

    "Bonnie, in other words, this last picture of Michael and the little blonde girl is a PhotoShopped picture, right? As sick as these people are, they couldn't even get it right. They made 1 big mistake with this picture. The little girl should have been a little boy."


    Josie - I think you misunderstood about the photo above - it was not photoshopped. Bonnie posted it to show that Michael witnessed God's truth - not Samantha's, Karen's or TINI. See the caption Bonnie wrote above the photo. It is a beautiful image that speaks to the heart of what we are fighting for - love and truth, as Michael lived it. :-)

    ________________________________________________

    Spotlight,

    Thank You for clearing things up for me. I greatly appreciate it.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Lady - Thank you! Why don't people listen to me? LOL! (I'm just kidding). Took them long enough, gee-whiz! Thank you so much for finding and posting.

    Mimi - I want you to know that I appreciate your support and your vigilance. I'm learning too. :o)

    ReplyDelete
  38. Skeptikos - (insert eye roll), if you want to know why I "censored" your post try re-reading what you wrote. I was VERY FAIR to you and someone posting here even apologized to you.

    This is NOT a public forum. This is MY BLOG. It is for MICHAEL not YOU. If Charles T. is allowed to moderate his blogs I am most certainly entitled to the same consideration.

    I am therefore not obligated to post ANYONE ELSE'S LINKS especially from a blog that offers no sources for it's claims.

    If Branca wants to advertise his "good" deeds, he has at least two other forums I can think of to do that. Thank you and God Bless.

    ReplyDelete
  39. SandyK - "Bonnie, I agree that this kind of communication you've posted in the image at the top of this page is totally uncalled for. This person does NOT represent Michael in anyway."

    --------- No they do not, I agree. And they keep proving time and again that they never did.

    SandyK said - "Great interview of Michael talking about his career called "Michael Jackson GLIMPSES ( very rare)." This sounds like it was done sometime in the 80's. I love the upbeat youthful enthusiasm in his voice."

    --------------- Thank you for posting that. I saw an article earlier that stated that their may have been a double filling in for Michael at the O2 Press conference due to him falling on the mini-bus steps. The link: http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.zeenews.com%252Fnews515001.html&h=aac45&ref=nf the read was interesting. I thought, "awww! Poor Mike!" Another fall. I don't know if it is true or not, but it may be another explanation for you all to play with :o)

    ReplyDelete
  40. Bonnie said: "I saw an article earlier that stated that their may have been a double filling in for Michael at the O2 Press conference due to him falling on the mini-bus steps."

    There has been multiple tales of the events regarding the O2 Press Conference that insinuate that MJ used a double. My personal favorite being the one where Michael had allegedly barricaded and locked himself in his hotel room, refusing to come out (in support of how adamant he really was in doing another tour). Do I believe such to be a possibility? Yes. It sounds like something he'd due considering the fact that his financial straits had forced him into doing these shows in the first place.

    However, do I believe that there was a double on the stage performing the speech/announcement? NO. Not considering the fact that as I watched the clip of this moment in MJ's history, I got sick to my stomach. I noted the title of the tour: "This Is It" and just watching Michael on the podium, told me on an intuitive level clean through to my gut that this tour really would be "it." That's how bad I sensed that something was really and very wrong. I'll never forget it. But, I will admit to the possibility that they did have a double ready.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Bonnie, first of all I hope you hand is better...
    I'd like to share my two cents about the famous O2 announcement and the possibility of "that" Michael not being Michael at all. I'm sure most of you remember that the question was initially brought up in the aftermath of the press conference, long before any of us might imagine what the next months would bring :-(
    I personally have had my fair share of doubts since then, and still have to this day.
    Needless to say - 99% of the newspapers back then were busy copy/pasting each other, so they all repeated the same mantra over and over again: the walk, the talk, the impossibly square chin, blah blah. Pfft, they don't even try to write something original when it comes to MJ, it's the same basic sentence copied forever, plus the odd new insult here and then. Nauseating as usual.
    It's so hard to tell whether that was Michael. The attitude was definitely strikingly "not him" - but I've always been willing to take into account that it was definitely not the usual occasion, either.

    Most of us had not seen Michael speak in public for quite some time, and that's another thing to consider.

    He was obviously wearing a particularly ugly hair piece that day (or was it chosen on purpose, to hide his features?..).

    The hands seem definitely Michael's hands, on the other hand (no pun intended).

    I'd say, what still fails to persuade him it's 100% Michael is - Not the voice in itself (enough if this tirade about him having the "fake"falsetto whispery and the "real" manly bass tone.... he had them all, he was an artist, he modulated his voice, what's so strange about it? the media really can be so obtuse). IT' not the voice, but rather the way he's pronouncing certain sounds. Michael has a unique way of pronouncing his "Ts", "Ds", even the "Ss". If you know his way of talking, you can always tell it's him, no need to see him. (That's why I never doubted it's him on the Glenda tapes - no mistaking, there).

    The O2 Michael has a really weird way of speaking.
    Anyone else has noticed the same? Sorry I've been so long, it's just still a very unsettling topic for some reason..... it may be useful, also, to compare those images from the press conference and the images from Michael's appearance (with the children and everyone, definitely him) that same night, at the Oliver! show..... what a jigsaw.

    Love to all <3

    ReplyDelete
  42. Bonnie said in response to Skeptikos: "If Branca wants to advertise his "good" deeds, he has at least two other forums I can think of to do that."

    Yeah...you tell him, Bonnie! We're all proud to be "Branca bashers" here! (I say that tongue in cheek, with a twist of mischievous humor.) We don't want to spoil our reputations around here, do we? LOL...

    On a more serious side, it's ALWAYS hard to trust a once trusted attorney and close friend who was found to have hidden payoffs from $ONY (Mattola at the time) overseas. Sorry, but Michael had FIRED the dude for a reason, and whether or not he had re-hired Branca shortly before his death-- at least willingly, still remains to be proven...

    ReplyDelete
  43. Just to let everyone know here is confirmation of TMZ's "scoop" yesterday...

    Conrad Murray to Joe Jackson: Objection!!!
    http://www.tmz.com/2010/10/11/conrad-murray-joe-jackson-michael-jackson-leonard-rowe-wrongful-death-katherine-jackson-charles-peckham-brian-oxman/

    Attorney for Michael Jackson's Physician Fights Wrongful Death Lawsuit
    http://www.aceshowbiz.com/news/view/w0007116.html

    And here's something else I'm sure that is something that many of us do agree on: "Charles Peckham, an attorney for Dr. Conrad Murray, fires back at wrongful death lawsuit filed by Joe Jackson, saying that Joe's lawyer Brian Oxman is 'incompetent legal expert.'"

    Another comfirmation...

    Michael Jackson - Murray's Lawyer Fires Back At Wrongful Death Suit
    http://www.contactmusic.com/news.nsf/story/murrays-lawyer-fires-back-at-wrongful-death-suit_1171694

    IMO just HOW Joe Jackson truly intends to win this case with Oxman at the helm, is beyond me. But remember...that's just my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Skeptikos has just informed me that I am running my blog like a concentration camp because he can't come here and freely post pro-Branca blogs here and insult people that apologize to him, so I want to make sure you guys are safe before you leave and be careful of the electric fence when you climb over to go to your other duties online.

    Why doesn't he ask Charles to open up HIS blog? LOL! Crikey!

    ReplyDelete
  45. Bonnie – I have heard that Oprah was invited to Michael’s family home at Encino to conduct interview with the father and mother and the children. What in the world going on? She interviewed the children about what? Oh my God I hope the family saw all her questions in advance to protect the children. What do you think?
    http://photos.tmz.com/galleries/oprah_visits_jackson_family_home#tab=most_recent&id=79356

    ReplyDelete
  46. Mimi - I am including that info on the Oprah interview in the blog tonight. Try to keep the faith. This is not without a purpose.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Bonnie informed us: "Skeptikos has just informed me that I am running my blog like a concentration camp..."

    Sorry, but I'm simply too darned busy laughing my bottom off!!! Well...having a moderated comments thing IS a pain in the patootie BUT...it's because of certain individuals who spend their time ranting and raving like lunatics and behaving worse than those claiming to have been possessed by demons, and the garbage they enjoy spewing all over the place, is the reasoning why the comments are moderated. People like himself can thank themselves for that.

    ReplyDelete
  48. About O's interviewing Katherine Jackson...

    Personally, I don't like O. I lost all respect for her several years ago. So, just as with all the hype about LMP's alleged interview by O, and how it mysteriously was shelved, it's doubtful that I will fail to tune in for this "ratings-gainer" either. She used Michael to earn her interview with him the all-time highest ratings that she'd ever earned, only to stab him in the back like all of the other lamestream journalists did. So no...

    Even though yesterday, Taj Jackson (Tito's son) Tweeted a ton of responses as to why his Grandmother did this interview-- which is intended on Katherine's part to "set the record right" about Michael, those of us with brains know O too well. Michael did the same thing, but O killed it with her infamous question: "Are you a virgin?". I mean really... Even though Michael recovered beautifully with his answer:

    "I am a gentleman..." O showed her true tabloid/sensationalist journalistic self there. I'm glad that O's show will end this year. It's been a long time in coming. In fact... it's long overdue. Someone should've shoved an apple in her mouth for the journalistic "pig" she is a long time ago already. Sorry... that's my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Bonnie,

    I have no intention of leaving your blog.

    You've been more than fair with everyone here.

    Keep Up The Good Work!

    ReplyDelete
  50. To Anyone

    I have been looking all over and still can't find where Oprah Winfrey says anything bad about Michael Jackson.

    If anyone has any links or info about this, Please let me know.

    Thanks in advance.

    ReplyDelete
  51. I was watching the 1993 interview of MJ on Oprah and I have a question.

    MJ said he never got to have slumber partys or play as a child because he had to rehearse.

    But wouldn't that be true of his brothers also?

    ReplyDelete
  52. @Lady,

    Yes, I agree with you about how Michael answered Oprah's obnoxiously intrusive question about his private life. Bravo Michael!! Excellent answer...:-) In later years she acknowledged that she didn't like asking him that question but it was what "viewers wanted to know." Just because viewers want to know doesn't mean they have to know. I for one did NOT need to know.

    @Josie,

    Oprah did an extremely unflattering show about Michael in 2005 during his trial. She essentially accused him of being guilty of a crime that the jury in his trial had not even decided on yet. As we all know, he was eventually acquitted on all counts in that case. Thank goodness that the truth prevailed and NOT ingnorance. (Forgive me for not having a source at this time.)

    ReplyDelete
  53. Lady - Don't laugh your bottom off, you will have nothing to sit on. Trust me, it's painful, I've done it.

    I was going to get a blog up tonight, but it's too full of information and I have to work on it some more. We care getting closer to something and it . . .I don't know, I may have to split it up. Will have it up tomorrow though for sure. I trust the Jackson's know what they are doing and as I commented on another facebook message thread, it's time someone used Oprah to undo what she did to Michael. The Jackson's are in the middle of litigation and I'm sure they will be represented during this interview. They need Oprah for the coverage. Have faith.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Josie - Thank you very much. Your support has been invaluable and I appreciate your input ♥

    Oprah Winfrey - Do a search on Youtube for Oprah interview with Lisa Marie, Pricilla Presley or any combination thereof. I don't know if they have this online, but try that. You may even find a transcript on Google.

    On your question about his brothers never getting to play . . . they were a bit older when they began playing music. Michael was five years old. The other brothers got started a bit older. Because of the age Michael got started he was also probably more shy because he had less interaction with other kids his own age.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Everyone -

    I was going to have a blog up tonight but it's late and I am still working on it, so I will have to post it tomorrow evening. It is a doozy. I started on one subject that grew to include other information I ran into. To shorten the blog I will probably have to put some up on the web site and link to that so those coming here with ADD will have less problems staying interested, LOL! (like moi).

    I apologize, but there are photo references and they have to be explained. We will be discussing Oprah and Katherine interview as well.

    Good night and God bless you ♥

    ReplyDelete
  56. Josie asked: "I have been looking all over and still can't find where Oprah Winfrey says anything bad about Michael Jackson.

    If anyone has any links or info about this, Please let me know."

    Here is the most recent, dated October 4, 2010:

    Oprah doesn't want to be Michael Jackson: the back story
    http://postcards.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2010/10/04/oprah-doesnt-want-to-be-michael-jackson-the-back-story/

    Outside of the 1993 interviewing of Michael, here's a rather shameless one of she and LMP in 2005:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7HUfwdtaXo

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7YuftxW1d4

    In any case, after studying "Communication Arts" in my High School days, which had covered body language featuring a book the entire class had to read that ironically was written by none other than Barbara Walters, it is my honest opinion, that during this interview Lisa Marie Presley had LIED on numerous accounts (noting her eyes roaming around, and looking downward frequently--she SELDOM appeared to look directly at Oprah, and yes...this is "BAD"). NOTE: She also did this during BOTH interviews (the 1st w/Michael-- when they were married) w/Diane Sawyer, although the 1st interview LMP is a bit more convincing than in the 2nd. Do a "You Tube" and you'll see it.

    I'm sorry, with my having conducted interviews before, whenever people have poor eye contact with the interviewer, it indicates a person who is being less than honest with what they are saying to you, and LMP is guilty of that. Additionally, LMP is talking so ungodly fast in the interview w/Oprah it's like she is really saying: "Help! I really don't want to discuss this, but I'll feed you a few tidbits. There. Are we done yet?" So, was Lisa Marie convincing? NO! Sorry, but NO. She lied her rear-end off. Bottom line...

    ReplyDelete
  57. Josie also asked: "MJ said he never got to have slumber partys or play as a child because he had to rehearse.

    But wouldn't that be true of his brothers also?"

    Yes, but most of his brothers were teenagers by the time they were "discovered" and working at Motown-- with exception to Marlon (who was a few yrs. older than Michael) and Randy (a few yrs. younger and lucky enough NOT to have been a part of the insanity until he was grown up). Fame and the price that was paid for it is best summed up with Michael's own quote: "Well, especially now I come to realize - and then - I would do my schooling which was three hours with a tutor and right after that I would go to the recording studio and record, and I`d record for hours and hours until it`s time to go to sleep." So, when you stop and think about it in all seriousness...WHEN did Michael have TIME to just be a child??? His childhood abruptly ended at the age of 5. :(

    ReplyDelete
  58. Ugh!! The very idea that Michael's children are possibly going to be interviewed publically by Oprah or anyone makes me feel sick in my stomach. I strongly feel that this should NOT be happening. If Michael's children wish to do this when they become adults that's one thing but NOT when they are still children. This is SO wrong. I feel that Oprah is doing this for ratings only. If she cared about these kids at all she wouldn't do this. IMO Michael would not have allowed this.

    ReplyDelete
  59. @ SandyK and all of those worried about Oprah's interviewing MJ's kids, READ CAREFULLY...

    "Oprah did not interview MJ's kids. Rumors get started and people run with them. We should know better than to trust rumor sites. about 7 hours ago via TweetDeck", Taj Jackson: http://twitter.com/tajjackson3

    ReplyDelete
  60. Karen Faye tweeted

    "My heart aches more than any one will every know. Clearly seeing how MJ was never loved as a son...merely a commodity."

    this was quickly deleted though. Why Karen? Why not leave it, you don't allow yourself to be intimidated, remember?

    How can Karen Faye POSSIBLY know what is in the heart of Michael's mother? Furthermore, regardless whether your statement is true, who exactly are YOU to make such public comments about his family? What makes you think that as a has been employee and even friend you have the authority to speak about his family? Judging from your past responses to such criticism, you'd either say "Michael wouldn't mind" or "Michael was to kind to tell the truth but I am not". Why then delete the "truth" you wrote? Either way Karen, Michael NEVER discussed his family publicly. In fact Karen, he said on a few occasions that he wants people to discuss his art, NOT his personal life. THAT is how we "common" people know that he would SURELY object to you speaking on his behalf in the manner you do. Just clarifying lest you accuse us of being "jealous" of you and not knowing Michael since we weren't in his 'inner' circle.

    ReplyDelete
  61. @Lady – thank you for saying "Oprah did not interview MJ's kids. Rumors get started and people run with them.” The story was told around as if she did. I was really wondering why the family allowed that and worried so much.

    I have some questions but I will wait until Bonnie include the topic in her new blog.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Thanks everyone for your input toward my question


    Note: The following are (My Opinions) only.

    I am NOT judging here nor would I ever judge.


    Lisa on Oprah in 2005

    The way I see LMP with MJ was LMP didn't realize at the time she married MJ that when you marry someone as Famous as MJ, you are marrying a "Corporation."

    There a tons of people working for MJ and you are dealing with those people and the business.

    Because MJ was "A Business." Everyone wanted a piece of him. He was always in demand. He was a Public figure All Around The World!

    MJ never had a normal life, so married life with MJ would also NOT be normal.

    MJ was a Corporation, a Business.

    (Like Tom Cruise)

    And I think MJ's idea of a wife, was someone who was to be there for him, to serve his needs and give him children and that's it.

    He wanted a wife to commit to his world and his life and give up hers. He didn't do this as a selfish act.

    He did it because that is truely what he thought a wife was suppose to be, at least for him.

    Like his mother who had 9 kids and remained with Joe in spite of whatever.

    LMP was to be "The Dutiful Wife" for MJ.

    But LMP did not realize this going into the marriage so she thought MJ was Using her.

    MJ was not using her, in my opinion. MJ was living his life the only way he could.

    MJ (I think) really loved Lisa but his ideas of what a "Wife" is suppose to be, were NOT the Conventional ways.

    So the marriage didn't work out because they both had different ideas of what that marriage was suppose to be.

    What I felt was shameful was they were airing this to the public.

    This was suppose to be private, where is the respect and dignity?

    Plus they were laughing about it! How Heartless!

    Totally Heartless!


    And at the very time that MJ was fighting for his life!

    That to me is very CRUEL and SHAMEFUL and I have no respect for LMP, her Mother, nor Oprah!

    God Bless You Michael and may you find rest for your soul.

    ReplyDelete
  63. @ Josie: About your "Lisa on Oprah in 2005" comments...

    Don't feel badly about the way that the interview rubbed you. You were not the only one who felt the way that you did after seeing and hearing it all. I realize that Michael going in to the marriage with LMP was equally disillusioned in the sense of his perspectives on what he wanted and needed in a Wife. I agree with your feeling that to him perhaps a Wife "was someone who was to be there for him, to serve his needs and give him children". That was a part of it. BUT...where you said, "He wanted a wife to commit to his world and his life and give up hers." I'm only going to agree with to a point. I think that Michael WAS looking for an equal partner in the marriage. Yes, for the most part he likely knew that his Wife would mainly be his "backup" but with his life and the demands of his fame being so pre-eminent in his life, being backup would have been extremely difficult at times.

    What I got out of all of it is that Lisa Marie Presley had her OWN dreams and desires, and she had a "me first" mentality. In several articles, it's also mentioned that Lisa was jealous of the time Michael would spend with children-- even her own!!! I mean really...now if you're going to be this man's Wife, and part of the wifely duty is to bear children... Well, I think you see my point here.

    In any case, LMP had absolutely NO intention of being a traditional child-bearing, stand by your man sort of wife. NONE. She was in it for herself-- a la "Rock n' Roll Princess", and whatever attention it would bring her as a stepping stone to embarking on her own yet to begin music career at that time.

    I'm sorry. Michael didn't use Lisa. Rather, Lisa is the one who used him. That's my opinion however, and I wish to make that clear. Again, no one has to agree with me.

    ReplyDelete
  64. @aida – wow!!!!!!! Karen tweeted saying, “Clearly seeing how MJ was never loved as a son...merely a commodity." She was an employee and a so called friend, and what does she truly know about Michael’s family dynamic?

    She can’t say that she loves Michael more than his family. If she really loves him, she would have given the at most respect to his family especially to his mother whom he loves dearly.

    You asked a good question why she quickly deleted it. Maybe she feels guilty and ashamed of her action for degrading the family?

    I wonder what Randy or Jermain or Taj Jackson who tweet regularly say about her in the past? I don’t tweet; maybe I should to ask them what they think about her if they were never been asked before. I really want to know how somebody in the family thinks about her.

    ReplyDelete
  65. @Lady,

    Thanks for posting that comment from Taj Jackson confirming that Michael's kids will NOT be put on display and interviewed. There was so much chatter a couple days ago on the web about there being a potential interview. Some web sources made it sound like a certainty. I'm VERY relieved to hear that it was just a rumour although I'm embarrased that I gave the story any validity at all. You'd think I would have learned by now. Looks like I'm going to have to be schooled all over again on how to deal with internet rumours...:-)

    Although the kids won't be involved in any interviews (thank goodness!), it looks like Michael's mother might be. In a CBS article it says that Randy Jackson is dissappointed in her decision to allow Oprah to interview her.

    Source:
    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31749_162-20019440-10391698.html

    Randy Jackson tweeted this today regarding Oprah interviewing his mother. (Love you Randy!!!!):

    "can you imagine how i feel. i'm angry 2"
    10 minutes ago via web

    "i know there are a lot of you out there upset and angry over this. i don't blame you"
    12 minutes ago via web

    "that was no coincidence"
    14 minutes ago via web

    "i can never forget when she had the show on pedophilia during the jury deliberation process in my brother's santa maria case."
    15 minutes ago via web

    "in fact, she is the last person on earth he would want around his children"
    20 minutes ago via web

    "I know how Oprah feels about my brother and family. i also know that he would not have wanted this."
    22 minutes ago via web

    "i had no prior knowledge this was going to happen. it was deliberately kept from me because they knew i would have tried to stop it"
    25 minutes ago via web

    "i found out Oprah was at our family home, my stomach ached and it still hasn't gone away"
    27 minutes ago via web

    "but i don't always agree with the choices they make. this is 1 of those times"
    30 minutes ago via web

    "1rst let me say that i love my mother and father. i am humbly grateful to have them as my parents"
    32 minutes ago via web

    "i know every 1 wants to know my position on the Oprah interview"
    35 minutes ago via web

    Source:
    http://twitter.com/randyjackson8

    ReplyDelete
  66. Aida mentioned: "Karen Faye tweeted

    "My heart aches more than any one will every know. Clearly seeing how MJ was never loved as a son...merely a commodity.""

    Oh how DARE she? Well, I've got a 'tweet' for her...

    "My heart aches more than anyone will ever know. Clearly seeing how MJ was never loved, appreciated, or cared for in spite of being surrounded by NUMEROUS individuals who claimed to be 'close friends' while they sell photos of his resting place, videotape, or whatnotall to TMZ or whatever gossip rag available in order to make a fast few bucks for THEMSELVES, and defend a group of paid stalkers."

    Oops....that would've been too long for Twitter. I would've had to use TwitLonger for that one. Ugh...that phony woman makes me wanna barf!

    ReplyDelete
  67. Josie said, "So the marriage didn't work out because they both had different ideas of what that marriage was suppose to be."

    Yes, Josie, you're right. He and LMP did have different views on marriage and I agree that these different views made their marraige that much more complicated. Although I agree with you on how Michael may have viewed marriage, I also feel, at least earlier on, he wanted to find a soul mate to share his life with, not just someone to be a "baby factory" for him. Of course, we know that the "baby factory" thing did end up happening later on.

    Yes, the interview Lisa Marie did at the time was regrettable and showed immaturity on her part. The interview shouldn't have happened but it did. To add some perspective, Lisa was dealing with a great deal of pain and hurt as a result of the break up, as was Michael. Yes, Michael did NOT do an interview. Their relationship was difficult on many levels and was made even more difficult when she learned that Debbie Rowe was pregnant with in a few months of their break up. In a seperate interview at a later date she acknowledge how hurt she was by this development at the time. (I acknowledge that this is a complicated issue and I'm intentionally staying away from debating LMP's reasons for not having children with Michael at the time.) This is not to justify her interviews/actions, this is only to add perspective and context. In the bigger picture, I believe LMP is a different more mature person now. I have a great deal of empathy for her and Michael's situation.

    ReplyDelete
  68. @Lady,

    I know Karen has been accused of a lot of things but I'm confident she didn't sell crypt photos to TMZ. As far as that photo is concerned, it was regrettable that the image was ever posted on her Facebook page. I don't understand why she did that. It would have been easy for someone to copy it and do what ever with it.

    ReplyDelete
  69. @ SandyK: You're welcome. As for Randy, I saw his Tweets today too. I really feel badly for him. He's trying to help keep his family AWAY from Oprah and those like her, and yet they consistently go and do something in opposition. I realize that Katherine means well, but Oprah is as lethal and cunning as a cobra. I just wish that if the Jackson family (except Randy-- he only Tweets when something is really worth tweeting about) truly wants justice in regards to Michael, they need to realize something...

    Eyes open...ears open...mouth SHUT!!! Good grief...

    ReplyDelete
  70. I just realised something.
    I hope no one gets mad at me for saying this.

    Again, this is my opinion because I can't know what's in a person's mind or heart.

    But when Lisa talked about MJ on that Oprah show in 2005 it was in part, (in my opinion) a form of "Exploiting Michael in Public."

    I think Lisa did it because she felt MJ exploited her in public during their marriage.
    She said she felt USED by him.

    What she did was not right, but for ME, it was understandable in the context that (at the time of that interview), Lisa still DIDN'T REALIZE that Michael NEVER used her.

    So I think I understand why she did it.

    We can all get spiteful from time to time and she still had a lot of growing up to do.

    I know I can get this way sometimes and even though it's not right, it's part of the human condition and growing up.

    She did put herself down several times in that interview, as well.

    All I'm saying is I don't think I (ME) should take sides here. I am speaking for MYSELF here.

    It's just sad that Lisa misunderstood Michael the way so many people have.

    We all make mistakes. And when Lisa was laughing it may have been her way of "Letting Go" and not meant to be cruel, nesscessarily.

    Michael Never used her and I think she realizes this now. At least I hope she does.

    I just think I was out of line before. Who am I to talk. I guess, I will try harder to keep my mouth shut when it comes to other people's lives.

    I need to concentrate on my own life and let everyone else live theirs.

    I know I could have deleted my posts, but I really needed to confess this out in the open.

    I feel better for this confession and I hope Bonnie will post this.

    God Bless Everyone Here.

    Peace,
    Josie

    ReplyDelete
  71. As for Oprah..........I really don't know.

    All I know is what my instincts tell me and that is:
    "I Do Not Trust Her At All."

    I'm going to leave it, at that.

    ReplyDelete
  72. I am in the process of posting. Two blogs going up tonight. The info on Oprah, Randy Jackson's tweets, Karen Faye's snafu's and Taaj Malik's pathetic posturing. But first . . . a word from Michael . . .

    ReplyDelete
  73. Concerning Karen's last Tweet;

    If she felt she mis-spoke, she should have posted a "Retraction" like I just did about Lisa

    That way, she would feel better about herself and the world would know where she stands.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Mimi

    I am not convinced that Karen felt guilty or embarrassed. IMO based on the attitude she so consistently displays, I feel that she didn't think about the reaction she'd receive from her fans (who I have to say are gullible enough to agree with all she says, to them she is infallible and partly they see how she cuts off others who question her so they want to remain in her clique) and any Jackson family member she may be in contact with (ie Randy). Once she posted the comment, it was the fear of losing audience and certain relations, and with it her current popularity. Keep in mind, the woman IS trying to go places business wise. A look at her professional website ( it may be shared with another lady) confirms this, she accepts all clients, even is willing to negotiate prices for those with low income. Imagine that, a celebrity make-up artist (F-list at best) suddenly reaches out to "common" people, as a grieving friend as well as a make-up artist.

    In another tweet she states,

    "If one shares personal feelings and opinions on Twitter...one must be prepared to accept others in return. "

    Talk about double standard, for anyone who's familiar with her tactics. A hypocrite who dares to call others hypocrites. She obviously doesn't think that the above statement is just as valid for her. Have to disappoint you Karen, there is but ONE GOD, and it certainly isn't you.

    Bonnie, feel free to delete my comments if you find them disrespectful and let me know if I am crossing the line. I just still haven't learned how to deal with hypocrites and opportunists.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Man!

    Am I glad to hear Michael's children are NOT going to be interviewed!

    Please, Leave Those Children Alone!!

    This world is hard enough to live in!

    ReplyDelete
  76. Hey Bonnie

    Don't know if u saw Taaj describing you as a schizophrenic on her Twitter a few days back.

    I said to her,

    "schizophrenia is an illness. People who suffer from it R far from "nutters". Belittling it maliciously is a dishonor 2 MJ. No? "

    to which she replied that she used it as a "metaphor" and that I don't know what's going on, to which I replied

    "I'm actually quite familiar. Regardless at whom the "metaphor" is aimed, it is mockery of a serious illness. Respect & empathy. "

    she then said how she's already "explained" it to me but my mind is made up and she "is not here to argue about nonsense" and how I am "blocked" (never followed her lol)

    and I replied

    "Blocked? haven't even followed you. Your explanation doesn't make sense, hence my reiteration. "

    She deleted her tweets (now why do "confident" folks do that lol) but the rest of them paint a picture of an unstable person, IMO, and don't mean it as a "metaphor" nor a mockery, I really feel she needs help and hope she gets it. Meanwhile, we honestly need stable people to speak for Michael.

    ReplyDelete
  77. yes, Lady, that comes from a woman who preaches against judging others.

    To be honest, she makes me sick way less than her fans.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Hey Bonnie

    I've been checking your blog for a new post all day. We do need to get back to Michael.

    ReplyDelete
  79. Aida - I did. Post on "Will you Be There" called "Free Michael..." I had a busy weekend and we are getting ready to move at the end of the month so I may be days without this computer and too busy to type. Gotta get done what I need to get done before then.

    No, I did not see Taaj's twitters. Sooner or later she will tire of me and slam someone else. I did see (or was sent) her twitter-blog tonight about my blog and I posted that as an extra blog tonight just because of the misinformation on there about the Transitional loan. I'm getting worried though. The whole tone of that blog of hers almost sounds like she is in a panic. The way it was written . . . I'm afraid for her.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Josie - Yes that tabloid reporting that the children would be interviewed was debunked. I never in a million years would believe the family would let that happen. Especially not with Oprah.

    I have been unable to comment on much about the Oprah interview because we are so busy getting ready for a move. I have to spend what time I can researching/posting the blogs and less time commenting, so if I sound short, it's because I'm rushed. It's going to be nuts over the next three weeks.

    ReplyDelete
  81. Oprah Interview -

    I was sent a copy of Randy's tweets:

    Michael Jackson - Winfrey To 'Interview Jackson Kids' - Contactmusic News
    www.contactmusic.com
    MICHAEL JACKSON's three children are set to break their silence in a candid chat with talk show queen OPRAH WINFREY, according to a new report - MICHAEL JACKSON News at Contactmusic.com (This was debunked. Children are not interviewed)

    · Comment · · Share

    Randy tweeted about Oprah just a bit ago...

    randyjackson8 Randy Jackson
    i will continue to do my best with my family. all i need is your love and support. i will never give up
    3 minutes ago
    ...
    randyjackson8 Randy Jackson
    Let our anger be the fuel that ignites our desire for truth, and keeps us unified on the road to justice for him.
    5 minutes ago

    randyjackson8 Randy Jackson
    i'm sorry for the delay. just trying to hold myself together
    9 minutes ago

    randyjackson8 Randy Jackson
    can you imagine how i feel. i'm angry 2
    13 minutes ago

    randyjackson8 Randy Jackson
    i know there are a lot of you out there upset and angry over this. i don't blame you
    14 minutes ago

    randyjackson8 Randy Jackson
    that was no coincidence
    16 minutes ago

    randyjackson8 Randy Jackson
    i can never forget when she had the show on pedophilia during the jury deliberation process in my brother's santa maria case.
    17 minutes ago

    randyjackson8 Randy Jackson
    in fact, she is the last person on earth he would want around his children
    22 minutes ago

    randyjackson8 Randy Jackson
    I know how Oprah feels about my brother and family. i also know that he would not have wanted this.
    24 minutes ago

    randyjackson8 Randy Jackson
    i had no prior knowledge this was going to happen. it was deliberately kept from me because they knew i would have tried to stop it
    27 minutes ago

    randyjackson8 Randy Jackson
    i found out Oprah was at our family home, my stomach ached and it still hasn't gone away
    28 minutes ago

    randyjackson8 Randy Jackson
    but i don't always agree with the choices they make. this is 1 of those times
    32 minutes ago

    randyjackson8 Randy Jackson
    1rst let me say that i love my mother and father. i am humbly grateful to have them as my parents
    34 minutes ago

    randyjackson8 Randy Jackson
    i know every 1 wants to know my position on the Oprah interviewSee More
    18 hours ago ·

    Diane Andrews Jones
    OK, I am confused. Did Oprah interview MJ's kids or not? Taj, (Michael's
    nephew) says, no! ~13 minutes ago via Tweet Deck: Oprah did not
    interview MJ's kids. Rumors get started and people run with them. We
    should know better than to trust rumo...r sites. https://twitter.com/tajjackson3

    ReplyDelete
  82. I am told that an earlier twitter by TajJackson said that the world needs to know the truth about his brother.

    I took this to mean that Taj was okay with Oprah and thought since she had a world audience that vindicating Michael on her show was fair since Michael was trashed on her show.
    I read later that Taj was NOT approving of the Oprah Interview with Joe and Miss Katherine.

    My opinion is that there is a purpose for this, agreeing with the person interviewing or not (really, is there anyone out there deserving of interviewing any of the Jackson's?) and the timing of such is important. I feel there is something to this.

    Someone wrote to me (paraphrasing) "I hope Oprah will be made to eat her words regarding what she said about Michael in 2005 during the LMP interview..."

    I agree, but will it happen? Is that even the focus of the interview or the purpose of it?

    I do not personally agree with Oprah interviewing the Jackson's but I feel there is more to this. Randy tweets only when something significant is either happening or getting ready to happen, so I pay attention to what he says on twitter. This is one of those things that we will have to trust the family on and just have faith that things are under control.

    ReplyDelete
  83. On Karen Faye's Tweets - I mentioned briefly on this blog update tonight http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/10/free-michael-will-you-be-there.html

    A total of ten people sent me this blog via email and Facebook private messages. I was told they were later deleted. I believe it is because someone forgot to tell her that Taaj was commencing damage control and Karen's tweets contradicted what Taaj was trying to get accomplished in covering for her past twitter sins.

    These people cannot get it together with whatever their agenda is and as I previously stated, Taaj's "Twitlonger" post sounded rather desperate and quite frankly, scary . . . like she was in a panic. Could be she is facing the possibility of a "pink slip".

    ReplyDelete
  84. What came to my mind while reading the discussion on LMP and Michael...about what Michael was looking for, hoping for in a wife, his life with LMP, in addition - refuge, a safe harbor.

    I believe though that having no functional male role model and witnessing the dynamics of his parents' relationship had to play a large role in his adult life. I also imagine the inner battle between that, his fame and his own character made it all very difficult for him.

    In the absence of abuse, blame for a marriage failure can not reasonably be placed on one person. It's just a real shame that LMP went public so negatively.

    aida said:
    "How can Karen Faye POSSIBLY know what is in the heart of Michael's mother? Furthermore, regardless whether your statement is true, who exactly are YOU to make such public comments about his family? What makes you think that as a has been employee and even friend you have the authority to speak about his family?"

    Excellent points.

    "...he said on a few occasions that he wants people to discuss his art, NOT his personal life."

    A good reminder, thanks aida!

    Lady said:
    "In several articles, it's also mentioned that Lisa was jealous of the time Michael would spend with children-- even her own!!!"

    No offense Lady but the press...do we still believe anything they say and write? Not me! Not much anyway, it takes a lot of discernment to wade through their trash for the tidbits of truth. I have learned so much from this blog and that is one of the biggies. With a grain of salt, question everything.

    BTW, I'm glad you and others follow Twitter and report so I don't have to!

    Josie said:
    "We all make mistakes. And when Lisa was laughing it may have been her way of "Letting Go" and not meant to be cruel, nesscessarily."

    Some people also laugh and don't make eye contact when they are nervous, uncomfortable, feel intimidated, cornered...especially on camera. I don't understand why she gave these interviews. It's sad.

    "I just think I was out of line before. Who am I to talk. I guess, I will try harder to keep my mouth shut when it comes to other people's lives."

    Goodness me, I admire your humility Josie! It's a good lesson for us all.

    I appreciate those of you relaying twitters here. I do have an account but tired of the gossip, backstabbing, posturing etc. I don't have a lot of tolerance for it so haven't been active on there for awhile. Plus, it consumes you, takes a lot of time just keeping up. I do find it interesting that new people follow me even though I've said nothing on there for a long time. It seems to be after I have said something here.

    About Taj Jackson, I know he loves his uncle deeply. But I was and remain confused about him promoting Sony's Michael Jackson Facebook page. Awhile back I think it was MJnews who was doing a lot of tweeting about getting the member numbers up on the Michael Jackson facebook page. Then Taj began doing the same. I (and probably many others) tweeted and asked him if he was aware of what Sony did to his uncle, said I was surprised he was supporting a Sony website. His response (not to me directly) was that it is important for the world to recognize Michael's popularity, or some such.

    Bonnie - I too have a lot of respect for Randy. He is one of the few that speaks words of substance from a place of concern and honesty.

    Your words and insight give me a lot of hope Bonnie. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  85. Just adding something, when LMP asked Oprah did Michael use her, she replied "all signs point to yes, but I don't know that". If you don't KNOW something why even imply it? What signs?

    Let's get something straight, whether or not LMP intentionally used Michael to promote herself, fact is that it was LMP who went public about their marriage post divorce while Michael was COMPLETELY silent about it. In fact he refused to talk ill of her or their divorce and reasons that led to it in interviews.

    LMP certainly used her marriage to Michael to promote herself/career, and I am not saying it was pre-calculated. But this much is a fact. Some may say she did not go on those shows (Larry King & Oprah) with intention to discuss Michael, I say that's BS, living in the world of celebrity she knew very well. Even if she didn't, how hard is it to say "No comment"?

    So how exactly she thought that Michael used her (when it is the other way around) really boggles my mind.

    Also, some may say she didn't know what she was getting into when she married him, I say again that's BS, they dated before she made the CHOICE to marry him. What man takes it well when his own wife refuses to have his children because she "thinks" he is emotionally immature and incapable of properly raising them? Well Lisa, why exactly did you marry him then? And why did you never share with Oprah or Larry that it was you who begged him to take you back, and that you will give him not one but nine children? Why did you keep THAT to yourself Lisa? I'll tell you why, because it would have been against the real reason you went public with it all in the first place.

    Sorry folks, I know no one is infallible, we all make mistakes, but people should at least act responsibly and own up to their actions without trashing others. Also, she had PLENTY of time to go public while he was alive to "set the record straight", I just don't buy it now that he is gone.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Arnie´s facebook name is Arnold W Klein, not Arnie Klein. It is fake.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.