Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Michael Jackson’s Sabatage

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Michael Jackson’s Sabatage

November 13, 2010 – Michael Jackson’s Sabatage– Jackson's Watching




The travel back home yesterday was stiffening even with the scheduled stops, but it gave me nine hours of Michael Jackson music.  I concentrated on History, Blood on the Dance Floor and Invincible Albums.  When I got home and could finally address some issues that I couldn’t because of being away in a hotel room on a computer that was not mine, I saw some things that surprised me and one was an email from a frequent poster to my blog:

***Today I was listening BlogTalk radio. The guests are Seven, Raven from Allforlove, and David. On the last hour talk, Erin from Justice4mj joined in. Once she joined in she started talking about praising Sony and the new song "Breaking the News" and how fans are going out of their mind protesting the album and bla, bla, bla. She was also praising Charles T. and asking him to call to the show if he is listening. He finally called and the discussion continued on the same topic she started, and a little later they started talking about you and your blog without mentioning your name and your blog. CT was saying how he was blamed for working for Sony and Branca and never met any one of them, and Erin also saying the same thing.

I was so surprised how the discussion went from media bias to discuss about your stand concerning Sony and the conspiracy that surrounded Michael's life. What I learn from this show is none of them know Michael at all but claim they do. The discussion was nice at the beginning talking about how media abused Michael and later I was really disappointed at them when they start talking about  Sony and how there is no proof Sony involved in killing Michael and bla, bla, again.

One thing though that stands for me is when Erin said to everyone and to CT to form a group to educate the fans about the goodness of Sony (something like that) and how Michael was working with Sony right after 2001, and they agree. I think this something we need to watch.

Also, CT was invited to host a show one day on that blog radio. I am sure you heard about it or listened to it already. If you did not please do so to know the exact things that was said. ***

I’ll do one better.  I’ll let YOU listen to it:  http://www.blogtalkradio.com/a-place-in-your-heart/2010/11/12/the-bloggers-view-our-pundits   Make sure you have a good three hours.  It’s a long one.

I did listen to it.  The first person speaking was Seven Bowie from Facebook.  We are all familiar with her blog.  This is someone who previously went after Sony and THAT was all over her blog as well.  The first subject she was asked about was Bashir.  I was very surprised that with all the “research” she has done on Michael she did not know the length of time Bashir hung around Michael to film that documentary  “ . . . what was it eight months? Five months?” – It was EIGHT MONTHS Seven.  EVERY Michael Jackson fan knows this.  It is mentioned on the documentary itself! 

Next was David Edwards, who frequently sends me requests to print/post his articles with links to either his blog or Raven’s or Seven’s or Muzik’s (the latter which I reprimanded him for).  He talked further in detail about Martin Bashir and how he manipulated Michael to even get the documentary.

People who do not fact check will need to consider something.  Why would the press or certain members of the press even go through the expense to orchestrate a decades-long public manipulation of Michael?  Who paid Bashir?  It wasn’t AEG, they did not exist back then in Michael’s life.  It was always, always Sony.

Continuing, a caller called in and asked if Michael would have benefitted from having a private investigator (during the trial beginning in 2004, he had several working on this), David answered saying that Michael should have had Tom Mesereau since he was a person of integrity.  I agree with this.  And during and after the trial, Michael did have Tom Mesereau.  Tom Mesereau prompted the investigation of the relationships around Michael during this trial.  Interfer discovered the relationship between Mottola and Branca which was present in the court transcripts.  Tom Mesereau remained a friend after the trial.  Sony’s involvement with Michael did not end after the trial.  Source http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/07/conspiracy-proof-case-that-never-was.html

Discussion proceeds to bleed over into Oprah and her interviews and how “covertly abusive” she was to Katherine (comparing her to Marin Bashir, regardless of her past treatment of Michael this is quite a stretch).  According to the host of the radio show Oprah should have never interviewed Miss Katherine or Lisa Marie.  Someone, either Raven or the host said that Lisa Marie hadn’t even seen Michael since the 2005 trial (they did NOT see each other during the trial.  Lisa said during the interview that Michael had called her, which I question if that phone call happened as Lisa Marie said), then someone else had stated it had been 14 years since they had even seen each other.

Lisa Marie another Failed Attempt to Control Him

Lisa Marie did not say on the Oprah interview that she loved Michael Jackson.  She said she was indifferent and TOLD HIM SO on this particular phone conversation in 2005.  She made sure the world knew that she made Michael Jackson cry.  She said she felt she understood him better, and she stated that they were in love when they married.  You do NOT treat someone you love the way she did in every interview she ever did since they divorced.  Reminder?  Source http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/10/oprah-on-michael-jackson-and-lisa-marie.html and This http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/10/lisa-maries-mom-shared-michaels-ex.html.  If Lisa Marie loved Michael and we are to determine this from HER OWN WORDS over the years, then Lisa Marie did love Michael in much the same way she loved any other material object she found she couldn’t have.  Lisa Marie wanted something else, but it wasn’t Michael.  Was she promised the ownership of her father’s songs if she could destroy Michael or help do so? 

Several songs Michael wrote about Lisa Marie.  Yes, he loved her and it is unfortunate because he was also WELL AWARE of what she was and what she was doing:

She plays a game with such an innocent face
I didn't know heartbreaking was her case
Her actions confess and put me through the test
I was surprised that I was caught inside
Now she's thinking that I will never know
and she'll keep playing until I let her go
But I hope in time that she will finally realize
I'm onto her game and she'll get played the same”



oh why ain’t you feelin’ me, she’s invincible
But I can do anything, she’s invincible
Even when I beg and plead, she’s invincible
Girl won’t give in to me, she’s invincible

Now many times I’ve told you of all the things I would do
But I cant seem to get through no matter how I try to
So tell me how does it seem that you ain’t checking for me
When I know that I could be more than you could ever dream”


The TRUTH is right in Michael’s words.  It always has been.  “Pundits” who never met him notwithstanding.  I do not pretend and never have pretended to KNOW MICHAEL JACKSON PERSONALLY.  This is why I GO TO HIM for the truth of what happened.  Was there love between Lisa Marie and Michael?  Yes.  But it all came from Michael.  We’ve seen the songs Lisa Marie wrote about Michael.  Those speaking on radio need to DO THEIR HOMEWORK if they are going advocate for Michael they really, REALLY need to listen to him.  Michael also wrote songs about/to Lisa Marie, pleading with her, in “Heaven Can Wait” which he talks about not wanting to leave her, and “Break of Dawn” is Michael’s own “Song of Solomon” and I believe was also toward Lisa Marie.  He loved her, of that I have no doubt.  To Lisa Marie, Michael was a work of art for which God outbid her and she has been angry and bitter about it ever since.   This is a topic that will be revisited.  Invincible album is a story in which Sony did not want to promote.

Invincible and the Catalog – Source of Sony’s Refusal to Promote Michael’s Album
It took a lot of guts to self promote when Sony tried ruining him.


Moving on – David is asked what he thought began the “downfall” of Michael Jackson.  He stated that he thought it began with the original extortion attempt in 1993 and that it gave the press an excuse to be more cruel to him, because Michael paid the parents off.  Let’s remember who Michael’s lawyers were at that time.  Who’s label was he under?  Who wanted Michael to pay them off?  Who talked Michael into doing such a thing when Michael wanted to fight it.  Who coerced the payoff by scaring him into believing he would not be able to fight the allegations?  Who was behind Evan Chandler to begin with?  Evan doesn’t name names but he does say that someone was behind him, “positioned” and “more than just me”.  I covered THAT here on this blog update  http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/08/michael-was-innocence-we-were-looking.html, covering this full transcript of what Evan said in that taped phone conversation.  http://www.mjfiles.com/allegations/david-schwartz-evan-chandler-transcript-full/

False – David said that “All that Glitters” was a book that Evan wrote that his brother was trying to shop to different bookstores.

Fact – Ray Chandler is the one who wrote the book. Source http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/08/what-we-dont-know-about-tmz.html   Also this source http://www.amazon.com/All-That-Glitters-Crime-Cover-up/dp/0975914723 .  It is published by Midpoint Trade Books; 1ST edition (September 2004), ISBN-10: 0975914723 and   ISBN-13: 978-0975914724.  David corrected this later in this discussion.

So who was the big money behind Evan’s extortion attempt and the bribing of so many officials?  Evan was in debt, so the money didn’t come from him.  Who was behind it?  AEG?  Nope!  They didn’t exist in 1992-1993.  The same people paying the lawyers who talked Michael out of fighting the charges . . . SONY!  Ray Chandler’s book was a calculated alibi for those involved in the attempt to wrest the catalog from Michael.  Why would a man write and admittedly admit that his family extorted Michael?  Does that make sense?  Explanation goes on to cover this also  . . . speculation that Raymond hated his brother.  Hmmmm. That does not explain why Ray would expose himself to possible prosecution as an accessory or even complicity in a crime to extort.  Raymond Chandler took a BIG RISK in writing this book, even with the disgusting additions to his characterizations of Michael.  Why would he do that?  It wasn’t out of hate for his brother.  Something much larger would have had to be at stake.  We could ask Evan but then he’s DEAD now, isn’t he?  Risk eliminated.

What More Can I Give – Sony’s Shameful BlackBalling of Charity Single


They also covered the lyrics for “Breaking News” and they did not discuss the “authenticity” of Michael’s part in actually singing the lead vocals (the song was never completed.  Ted Riley produced the rest of it and you can hear Michael in some of the background but large chunks of it are someone else’s voice layered in).  I cover the lyrics here on this blog update http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/11/we-know-whats-going-on-dont-we.html down in the comments thanks to Miss Shae.  Interesting he mentions falling in love and who is the boogie man you’re thinkin of . . . Lisa Marie?  Breaking News times 2?  They lyrics are not JUST about the press.  They “hate” that the message is buried amongst all the controversy.  So do I.  But you do not bury the truth just because you don’t like it.  There was more to this song.  It is not just the lyrics.  You have to listen to the song, listen to the voice.  Yes, it DOES MATTER that Sony put this out knowing that Michael’s voice is secondary on this song and that Sony is trying to hide behind an incomplete song processed to make it look like Michael sang it.  (He sang IN it.  Should that matter?  This will be a defining moment down the road, you will see.)

What Corey Rooney Had To Say


Why would the Cascio’s sell music of Michael’s to Sony, knowing how Michael felt about Sony?  That is a good question.  There is a reason for everything.  This is a question that will later be answered in good time.

Now we skip head to the oh-so-interesting portion of the L-O-N-G radio interview: 

I agree with the whole discussion in regard to the evil of the media and the fact that they persecute the innocent while lifting up and excusing the activities and actions of criminals. 

Several callers called in, and one of them was Erin Jacobs (of Justice4MJ – The same person who wrote her name on the wall at Neverland and who’s group fought with Taaj Malik over the banner-flying over the courthouse). 

Erin’s Second Job – Defacing Michael Jackson Property


She brought up the Thomson blog article on Kelvin MacKenzie and the work all these blogs out there have been doing out there to clean up Sony’s mess.  I do agree with Erin that MacKenzie is an idiot, abusive and that ITV should issue a public apology.  I have yet to hear the interview.  I’m glad I didn’t, I don’t think I could have taken it.  But hold onto this thought for a moment while I get through this (cock-fighting, I will explain in a minute).  To be cont…..

Michael In Waiting – For Fans Loyal to Him, Not Sony


22 comments:

  1. Bonnie said, "I was very surprised that with all the “research” she has done on Michael she did not know the length of time Bashir hung around Michael to film that documentary “ . . . what was it eight months? Five months?” – It was EIGHT MONTHS Seven. EVERY Michael Jackson fan knows this. It is mentioned on the documentary itself!"

    Absolutely!! I also listened to the radio interview and was struck by this comment as well. She should know this without even thinking about it. However, for me, whether it was 5 or 8 months in the bigger picture was inconsequencial. The core of that issue, as we all know, was Bashir's deceptive tactics inorder to get Michael on camera to say something damning about his alleged relationship with children. And the evil snake manufactured a situation in order to get what he wanted. Or to use a term Seven likes to use in her blog, to get his "precious." A reference to the J.R.Tolkien "Lord of the Rings" series in which the 2 principle characters desire to posess a very powerful ring. One character, Frodo Baggins (wide eyed and innocent), fights that desire inorder to destroy the ring while his antagonist, Gollum (grotesquely mis-shapen in mind and body), gave into to the seductive power of that ring that he calls "my precious" and who was ultimately destroyed by that desire. Bashir is the very embodiment of Gollum. I become ill whenever I think of this man!

    "Dieter Wiesner, the pop star's manager from 1996 to 2003, stated about the influence of Bashir's documentary on Michael Jackson:

    'It broke him. It killed him. He took a long time to die, but it started that night.'"

    Source:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Bashir

    Bonnie, I have a question, and please forgive my ignorance, but how do we know that Bashir was paid by Sony?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bonnie said, "Oprah and her interviews and how “covertly abusive” she was to Katherine."

    I agree with you. This was a stretch. Despite my fears, Oprah was not abusive, and even came across as compassionate. She comforted Michael's mom as she had a hard time talking about him since his death. Even holding her hand as Katherine wiped tears from her eyes.

    As for the rest of the radio interview with the bloggers, as you mentioned, people were having a hard time with facts. I wanted to call up and say "hey, that's not what happened."

    Bonnie said, "To Lisa Marie, Michael was a work of art for which God outbid her and she has been angry and bitter about it ever since."

    Wow!! Well said! I agree. However, I disagree that she didn't love him. I think there was "love" from her, at least at the beginning, but she became consumed by something else altogether. To me, her idea of "love" tends to be obsessive and controlling, wich at the end of the day is not love, of course. I don't think she entirely sees this yet, however, I do think there are some cracks in her seemingly cold exterior. The thing that ruined her credibility for me during that interview was the fact that a new album is to be released soon. The last time she was on Oprah, she was also promoting a new album. I'm glad they didn't have her sing any of it like she did in the 2005 interview. That would have been obscene!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow Bonnie, so much information here!! there are several topics to develope in this blog. Really amazing!
    I ask you please if you could clarify something I got shocked:
    Interfer discovered the relationship between Mottola and Branca which was present in the court transcripts.
    Honestly I don't remember where is this information. Could you please help me to find it? Are they in the court transcripts of 2005?
    Thanks a lot for everything!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bonnie congratulations, you've worked hard and soon, tomorrow I have to read all, thank you bonnie!
    God bless you!

    ReplyDelete
  5. SandyK said - "Bonnie, I have a question, and please forgive my ignorance, but how do we know that Bashir was paid by Sony? "

    We don't know. Do you think Sony would pay the man directly? No. Most of these people are some obscure expense item on a ledger somewhere through third parties. Bashir had an employer. Believe me Bashir is one of the pieces of Lego that will connect much of this when everything is revealed. It's not my responsibility to give all the answers because I don't know them . . . I know just enough to help people look and research for themselves. I can't do this all by myself. We've learned what we've learned here because of the contributions from EVERYONE who reads and posts on this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank god Bonnie for your blog!! I love that is the only blog that I read that is well written and insightful and that you cut through all the BS and get directly to the point with all the insanity that is presently taking place.

    Thank you again ;)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bonnie – when I listened to the blog talk show I was surprising to know how this girl named Erin Jacobs is a strong supporter of Sony. She advocates for Sony as if she works for them. Why would she furiously wanted to convince the fans or whoever listening the talk show how good Sony is? She must think we fans completely forgot the horror Sony put Michael before he was killed.

    What I want to know is those who support Sony to tell us why is that Michael did not have any new songs release after 2001 if he is still working with Sony. Michael was cheated and back stabbed by his own lawyer (it happened be the lawyer was working for Sony too without Michael’s knowledge) for not being notified the hidden clause that prevented him from being released from the contract he signed until 2009. The excuse they give that Michael worked with Sony after 2001 is so very elementary. You can be fooled by their bogus clam if you did not do your own research to find out Michael indeed did not work with Sony willingly but he was bind by contract until expiration day, which he got killed before that day.

    They try to tell us how Michael worked with them by bringing up all the re-packaging of the old song done after 2001. Michael himself said he writes more than 100 songs for one album and that means he has many songs sitting in his vault that can be put in new albums while he was still here. Why he did not do that if was working with Sony as those of Sony supporters claim to be? The answer is Michael DID NOT want to do anything with Sony when it comes to having new albums but waiting patiently for the contract to be over so he could embark on a new way of doing business without them, but he got murdered before he accomplished his dream.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have yet to listen to the Blog Talk Radio - I will shortly but I want to mention one thing in relation to the length of time Mr. Bashir spent filming Michael.

    I know he repeatedly claimed he spent 8 months with Michael but if you go by the mjjtimeline.blogspot.com

    * June 11 :

    Michael has dinner with Uri Geller and his family. Geller introduces him to British journalist Martin Bashir who wants to do a TV documentary on Michael.

    This appears to be when Mr. Bashir first met Michael.

    Also from mjjtimeline.blogspot.com

    * January 12 :

    Michael gives his final interview to Martin Bashir in his Miami Hotel. The same day, he hears that Maurice Gibb has died from an heart attack.

    We know the documentary aired in the UK on Feb 3 (Feb 6 in the USA).

    Now I don't know how accurate this website is - but IF it is accuarate then at most Mr. Bashir could have only spent 6 months with Michael.

    ReplyDelete
  9. SandyK said - "'It broke him. It killed him. He took a long time to die, but it started that night.'" and on Lisa Marie "I think there was "love" from her, at least at the beginning, but she became consumed by something else altogether. To me, her idea of "love" tends to be obsessive and controlling, wich at the end of the day is not love, of course."

    Forgive me for the break but I have been nursing a killer migraine today and It still torments me, so I am addressing this blog in pieces tonight. I napped a little but the headache was still squeezing my brain when I woke up.

    Every time I hear or read quotes like this on what Bashir did to Michael psychologically it makes me very angry. Partly because of the evil that exists in someone that can do that to another human being in the first place. I just cannot conceive it. It makes me angry to the point of tears. And also partly because I firmly believe that God never lets us endure anything that we cannot handle and I know how faithful Michael is in God. It kills me to even dwell on the pain of what he went through I can't even imagine going through it. The closest I can come is to a court case I went through when I was eleven years old and I wasn't even the accused. I do believe that Michael's suffering was not in vain. The suffering of the faithful never is. There is always a greater purpose for it and I know this will make some reading bristle, but it's the truth. Michael's own story made me see the purpose in the tragedy in my own life. Every bit of this has taught me something and helped me connect loose strands in my life. I thank God for Michael and I still pray for him and ask God to relieve his suffering . . . just in case. ♥ If in doubt, pray . . . so I do.

    Lisa Marie - that girl one day is going to crack. She is so closed up and hard she is brittle and you know the fragility in the brittle. I believe Michael saw this in her. the longer she takes to let it happen (open those doors and let her pain out) the worse the breakdown is going to be. She is only four years younger than me and I was about the age she is now when it happened to me. Unlike you I believe in the beginning she did NOT love Michael. I believe though that she grew to feel what she thinks is love, or more to the point, she felt love and did not recognize what it was and did not know how to proceed. She treated that emotion like she does every other one and that is to hold it at bay and substitute aloofness for it. I believe she was caught between her own emotions and her original objective. Michael had been hurt enough and he moved on . . . had to. I also believe that note that was found in the storage unit was written by Michael but gave Lisa Marie the option because he was still trying and Lisa Marie is the one that finally filed after Michael left. I am angry about that too because what I thought was this true-blue . . . you know Sandy, I just wanted Michael to have a soul mate somewhere, somehow just once in his life! You know? I was CRUSHED when I saw that interview and saw all the other interviews that girl gave. I'm sitting here CRYING as I type this because I WANTED THAT for him!!! I really did! He is not that hard to understand!!! Why could't SOMEONE at least meet him halfway?

    I wish I could sit here and say, "I will never forgive her for what she did" but I can't because I know that God would welcome her with open arms if she would just ask him too. I know Michael would too. I would love to talk to her because Sandy, I know where she is. She may have already gone over, I don't know but I hope not.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Beatriz said - "Interfer discovered the relationship between Mottola and Branca which was present in the court transcripts.
    Honestly I don't remember where is this information."

    There is a link on that same blog to a copy of the court transcripts from 2005. I believe you commented on that same blog. You can also do a search in the search box top-right of this blog for "court transcripts" and it will list every blog update where the links and reference to this is. Hope that helps♥

    ReplyDelete
  11. Daniela said - "Bonnie congratulations, you've worked hard and soon, tomorrow I have to read all, thank you bonnie!
    God bless you! "

    >>>> This blog update I believe caused my migraine. Stupid radio show was too long and half my time was spent listening to that and going back over the info while researching their claims and finding links. Before I knew it, it was after 6am. I really have to learn to pace myself. It's my own fault I have the migraine. God Bless you as well♥
    ---------------------------------------------

    EileenG said - "Thank god Bonnie for your blog!! "

    Thank God for people like you supporting Michael and his children and family. Without the feedback and the resources many of you send I would have lost my energy a long time ago. God bless you Eileen.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Mimi said - "Michael was cheated and back stabbed by his own lawyer (it happened be the lawyer was working for Sony too without Michael’s knowledge) for not being notified the hidden clause that prevented him from being released from the contract he signed until 2009."

    >>>>You are bringing up a very good point here and one that the Sony people keep confusing the fans about.

    SONY OWNED Michael Jackson musically and the albums they put out: "The Definitive Collection" and "The Ultimate Collection" were not to fulfill Michael's contractual obligations. "Thiller 25th Anniversary" was the album that took care of that. People need to realize that Sony could put together any of Michael's songs that they wanted and put out an album without Michael's permission until his contract was up. Michael received royalties (maybe) and this is what Michael was waiting for, to regain the rights to his own songs. July 7th was the date that was to happen. Sony would no longer own Michael's songs. Lo and behold, Michael is killed on June 25th. So Erin can take her little pleas to support Michael's album and STUFF IT! I don't believe for ONE MINUTE that Michael's children would even WANT money generated by anything Sony had a hand in knowing what they did to their father!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Karen said - "Michael has dinner with Uri Geller and his family. Geller introduces him to British journalist Martin Bashir who wants to do a TV documentary on Michael.

    This appears to be when Mr. Bashir first met Michael."

    >>>>I follow this timeline and refer to it all the time and yes, I did see this. However this blog timeline does not have EVERYTHING and every episode. It is the most complete one I have seen out there which is why I use and refer to it.

    On the answer to that documentary with Maury Povich, they also mentioned the eight months Bashir spent with Michael which is why I lean toward the eight months. We don't know if the timeline meeting is the first with Bashir, but it is something to consider. Thank you for pointing that out.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Why was I initially surprised at Seven and David...the inaccuracies and omissions? Mostly Seven because she seemed to present respectable in-depth information FOR Michael without affiliation. I have to say though that I had noticed a couple months back that she seemed to be being "courted" on Twitter by the controversial "fan" members. Has she now aligned with them? If so then I have to wonder what was and is her purpose, her role. She has a significant fan following, she is respected. Now I wonder where she is leading her followers.

    David has done some good research and writing. However, I was suspicious of him from the beginning because of his affiliation with a blog that was actively attacking Bonnie and this blog in defense/on behalf? of Charles Thomson. I wondered why David appeared so helpful here but wrote and posted for, has his own dedicated section, is a trusted member on that other blog. Most of the time when he posted here he was pointing readers to that blog with a link. Hhmmm...

    Fearless Bonnie...good job!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Mimi, you're right, Michael wasn't willingly working for Sony after 2001. Technically he wasn't working for them at all anymore. As I think you mentioned, he was able to get out of his contract due to a conflict of interest concerning his lawyer having professional responsibilities to Michael and Sony. Of course this is not allowed.

    After 2001, Michael was not obligated to release new material with Sony, however, previously released material was still in Sony's control. Michael had no choice but to work with them concerning re-releases of old material, although they didn't need his permission. As you mentioned, he was killed before he could gain ownership of his own intellectual property.

    All too convenient I'm afraid...:-( This was sabatage in every sense of the word.

    Actually Bonnie answered this more completly in her comment above.

    *************************************

    Bonnie said, "I wish I could sit here and say, "I will never forgive her for what she did" but I can't because I know that God would welcome her with open arms if she would just ask him too."

    Bonnie, thank you. You showed that one can still have compassion for Lisa despite the hateful, hurtful things she has said publically. I will never understand the things she said, especially publically. Michael never trash talked her. Not a peep. He could have but he didn't. It's not in his character. It's that character that draws me to him. In light of Lisa's comments, I don't hate her. In fact, I pity her. I think there is a whole bunch of emotional stuff inside her that she has never dealt with. A break down could happen. I do pray for her and her current marraige. Her current husband seems to be very patient...so far. She often praises him publically. She and Michael's world views were so different. She a Scientologist and he a Jehovah's Witness. She, "me" focused. He, "other" focused. She and her current husband seem to be more united and it helps that they are both part of the same "religion," if you can call it that.

    The part that bewilders me is what Michael saw in her to begin with. Obviously he saw something that was meaningful to him beyond Lisa being the attractive daughter of Elvis. Michael isn't that shallow. Although this is a stretch, I try to see her through his eyes. Needless to say, I haven't succeeded, although I do have compassion for her.

    Thanks again for the compassion you showed to her in your comment.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Truthbtold said - "David has done some good research and writing. However, I was suspicious of him from the beginning because of his affiliation with a blog that was actively attacking Bonnie and this blog in defense/on behalf?"

    >>>>Seven does have a significant fan following and I was really hoping that she would be responsible with that. I want to point out that she has been vigilant with Sony, but as outspoken as she is, she said NOTHING to curtail Erin Jacob's deception to the fans about Sony's role in Michael's life. I look at it this way, after backing the Samantha lies and backing Charles even with his past, I have to question those who back liars and what their real agenda is.

    David I am well aware of his affiliations with the other blogs and you are absolutely right about the posting of links here. David however has been indiscriminate in sharing his research and even though he does post links here, he has also privately emailed me and posted privately on Facebook. With the research he's done however, I cannot believe that he would not know who Muzik was or what she has done in regard to attacks on the Jackson family and when he attempted to post a link to her blog here. Even though it agreed with my assertion that the voice in "Breaking News" was not Michael's, there was no way I was promoting a blog by a person that has engaged in the acts that she has against Michael's family and I told him so. He did apologize and wrote that he didn't know she had done these things, but unfortunately I do not believe him.

    ReplyDelete
  17. SandyK said - "The part that bewilders me is what Michael saw in her to begin with. Obviously he saw something that was meaningful to him beyond Lisa being the attractive daughter of Elvis."

    >>>All the Lost Children. She is a lost child.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Bonnie said, ">>>All the Lost Children. She is a lost child."

    Yes. I hadn't concidered that.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Lovin' "Hold My Hand"!!!

    Michael and Akon's voices sound great together. I just wish there was MORE Michael....:-)

    No turning back now...:-(

    Beautiful song...:-)

    ReplyDelete
  20. If I may, I'd like to post this from Justice about "Hold My Hand." I know you have differences with Justice, Bonnie, but I think you might agree with Justice sentiment here....hopefully....:-)

    Justice said, "Tonight, with the release of Hold My Hand, I felt something I have not felt in a very long time; since perhaps before Michael Jackson died. When I listened to the track for the first time, I felt that same chill run through my spine that always happens when I listen to Michael Jackson. I felt that sense of magic; the combination of an unexplainable excitement and soothing familiarity that comes to me when I listen to Michael Jackson's voice. In addition, I felt a sense of solidarity between Akon and Michael. Their harmonies and melodies fuse so smoothly together that a sense of comfort came over me that I have not felt in a very long time. Tears of joy mixed with sadness for the loss of Michael Jackson overcame me and so I sought solace in Twitter."

    ReplyDelete
  21. Wow!!!! Good job Bonnie yet again.

    Alot to absorb...I had to read and re-read again. I do not doubt that their are personal agendas involved in this whole sorted mess. Good and truth always prevail in the end and we are far from the end of this story.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.