Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Sony Still At It With New Cast Members - Part 2

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Sony Still At It With New Cast Members - Part 2

November 14, 2010 – Erin’s Stint on CNN – TINI’s Old Stomping Grounds
Part 2 – Sony Still At It With New Cast Members
Michael Looking for his True Fans


Erin stated that she was contacted by CNN and Entertainment tonight in reference to her involvement with Justice4MJ and The Michael Jackson Fan Club of Southern California.  She further explained that during the seven-minute (seven?) segment they covered, their group was called “knuckle-heads”.   I thought back over the numerous Twitter battles between her group and Taaj Malik’s group and wondered if maybe that didn’t have something to do with the knuckleheads comment.  But then I remembered the ready exposure CNN offered the newly formed TINI group and their website backed by the same host that big name Sony and Universal pictures used. Yes, the same group that spawned Samantha, only I know where Samantha really came from.

Erin brought up CT and his article about the codes in journalism broken by ITV and MacKenzie and Catherine (show’s host) asked Charlie to call in.  Erin also addressed the attacks by members of the fan community against Charles Thomson but of course didn’t address why that had happened.  That wasn’t the issue of the radio show.   That came after Charles made a miraculous appearance.  But as Host Catherine pointed out the core word in “ignorance” or “ignorant” is “ignore”.  There are facts in this radio show that are in fact, being ignored.  TwistedVision of MJStar, LowlyNewshound and Charlie Thomson are in fact the same person.  Charlie Thomson contributed to much of the negative press that Michael Jackson received until the time of the upcoming concert when everyone seemed to switch gears.  Sony had some messes to clean up.  How were they going to profit from a man they spent decades using the press to destroy his career and force him into bankruptcy?  (Twitter Karen Faye: “Taaj change direction”)

Toward the end of this program the true purpose of this radio show is revealed.  Erin Jacobs begins a rant on the fans reactions to the “Breaking News” song and a petition put out by a group asking for three of the songs to be removed from the album.

First of all, I recall just a few short months ago how irate this SAME FAN COMMUNITY that was on this radio show, INCLUDING SEVEN over the fact that Michael’s unreleased music was sold to Sony in the first place.

Michael’s nephews and Corey Rooney on HIS FACEBOOK PAGE is the one who questioned the vocals.  Ted REILLY on Twitter is the one who would not commit to the vocals being Michael’s.  He said to ask the Cascios!  Only later when pressed (and attacked on Twitter according to them) did he say that Michael’s voice was in there.

Now we have members of these same immature packs of women who were at twitter war with each other just a little over a month ago, trying to GUILT FANS INTO SUPPORTING THIS ALBUM PUT OUT BY SONY.

When I was alerted to this radio show, I saw red.  I was furious.  I called a friend of mine and left a message:  CALL ME!  We talked until 2am (my time) and other than a few hours sleep, I’ve been doing some RESEARCH.

The Face I will Never Forget – Pain


I am not the only one that suspected the objective of these groups (Taaj vs. Hulya, Jacobs vs. Malik, Taaj vs. Justice4MJ, Muzik vs. Thomson, she disappears, comes back my friend, then attacks me over Taaj and Samantha’s Jackson family fantasies, then Muzik vs. Taaj, etc…) was to create controversy, split the fan base, confuse, distort, malign, attack not only each other but the Jackson family as well.  Every one of them in these groups have attacked one or more members of the Jackson family.

Well, that wasn’t working, so now they attack the fans.  Yes, you are stabbing Michael in the back if you don’t buy from Sony, who not only stabbed him in the back but delivered the fatal blow . . . this is what they are now trying to sell you.  You are supposed to not only create your own history my friend, you are supposed to FORGET history.  Theirs!

The famous saying goes, “If you don’t remember you’re history you are doomed to repeat it.”

Don’t just create your history…RECORD IT


Following Erin along, I thought I knew where this was going to end up and I wasn’t disappointed.    Erin says “we have had a voice authenticator, O’Reily, The estate . . .”

We?  We Erin?  Sony claimed they hired the voice authenticators in more than one publication and online rag.  Who is WE Erin?  Could you clear that up for us?  Did YOU hire the voice authenticators?  Did Sony hire them?  Or did both of you split the bill?  Did you go Dutch on this one?  I know Sony is having some financial problems, but I didn’t know the position of  KNUCKLEHEAD was such a well paying job.  But I guess they felt you owed them after bailing you out of the cost of cleaning up the wall at Neverland after you added your graffiti to it.  Please, let us continue with this oh-so-enlightening radio show.  (These people are so transparent it is unbelievable!  Why do they make my work so easy?)

Erin talks about Michael’s voice changing when they get older as an excuse.  I guess it must have changed back for “This is It” huh Erin?  Yes, that man has quite a range doesn’t he?  There is one thing you cannot fake of Michael’s and that is his vibrato. The lead vocals in most of the song is not Michael.  The acapella version of the song is just that.  An acapella version of the song and it’s not even complete.

Host Catherine states she is going to buy the album because she loves him.  Those buying tabloids could use the same argument . . . it has Michael in it, so why not?  Finance his murder.  Go ahead!  But don’t accuse fans of sticking a knife in Michael’s back because they question the very people that Michael himself implicated in his decades long torment!

Host Catherine, you compared boycotting Michael’s album to boycotting CNN or ITV by saying that with the news, you had other options, but with Michael you had no options.  It was the only way you could get to hear him.  Not only is that self-serving, it is disingenuous to suggest to fans that they will never hear Michael ever again unless they buy from Sony.  And if you BUY from them, you continue to ENABLE them.

Michael SACRIFICED HIS LIFE to alert the public to what SONY and the music industry was doing to its artists.  If YOU cannot so much as sacrifice the opportunity to hear one QUESTIONABLE album, you haven’t learned a whole lot about the man and that is just MY OPINION.

Again with the argument that fans are taking money from the children.  No, they are not.  They are taking money from Branca.  The children and Miss Katherine get the same allowance regardless of what the Estate makes.  The two “Johns” make their 10% though, plus they earn on the other side of those deals.  The same, tired, worthless and wrong argument.  Then you have Howie Weitzman, who will make sure that Michael’s children have as much money left when they come of age at 40 years old, as Kurt Cobain’s daughter had when he strong-armed Courtney into dropping her lawsuit against him for falsifying bank accounts in her name.

Erin, you BLEW IT when you said “We”.  Sony, please check the IQ’s of the people you are paying, because my humble opinion?  You are NOT getting your money’s worth!

Here we go . . . Erin brings up the issue of Michael’s family filing a lawsuit against AEG and not Sony.  (LOL, sorry but we’ve been here before).  By the time this is all said and done, I don’t believe ANY of this will be an issue.   The AEG lawsuit will go nowhere.  Erin tooting Sony’s horn for them is just comical if not predictable.  I expected this would be Thomson’s job, not Erin’s.  I thought the whole point of bolstering Thomson’s reputation after being connected to Lowly Newshound and MJStar forum was so people would believe him when he began trying to advocate for them.  But no, they pick someone who defaced Neverland property.

Let not any of these “fans” deceive you.  Michael Jackson told you who it was.  Michael Jackson’s speeches were against Sony, not AEG.  Michael said “create” your history, not “recreate” someone elses.

Erin says it was AEG and the Cascio’s that went to Sony.  How does she know?  How does she know Sony and Branca didn’t threaten the Cascios as soon as that news item surfaced that they had work from Michael in their recording studio?  AEG could not even put on a concert without Sony’s permission.  They still owned Michael’s music!  Michael was to get the rights to that music just a couple of weeks after he was killed!  Why not talk about this Erin?  The MOTIVE is right there in front of you.  Much more motive than AEG had!  They needed him ALIVE to make any money off of him.

Look at who has made the MOST MONEY from Michael since he was taken away from his children!  AEG has not made a DIME!  Not one stinking dime!  They are still in the red from the outlay for those concerts.  Branca has made millions. Sony has made millions.  Erin is pontificating on Michael’s legacy being taken from his children!  Just look at where that money has gone!  Because his children have received NONE OF IT AS OF THIS DATE!

Mottola was brought up.  No, Mottola is not working for Sony, at least publicly.  But Tommy’s assertion that he was the “gatekeeper” of Michael’s unreleased music?

Tommy Not Working with Sony?  TOMMYROT!!!

The problems with Sony were NOT isolated to Tommy Mottola.  The problems continued AFTER MOTTOLA WAS FIRED and they began before Tommy was heading Sony.  Michael was just not yet aware of it.  But some close to Michael were.

Erin brushes this issue aside as saying Mottola is irrelevant.  No, he’s not irrelevant Erin.  He’s most certainly not the ONLY one, but he is NOT irrelevant.  Your argument is.

We can discuss the issue of AEG and Michael’s catalog and who would end up with it. The truth of the matter is, the people who would end up with Michael’s catalog was MICHAEL.  If AEG was going to end up with Michael’s catalog, then why don’t they have it now?   Follow the money, Seven, remember?  Who is making all the money? 

Who has the catalog?  The estate has the catalog.  John Branca, one of the people investigated during Michael’s trial, the one who was fired by Michael in 2003, has the catalog.

AEG’s contract is something I never had a chance to go over.  Now that I know more about what is going on, I’m going to refrain from going over the contract at this time.   There is more that will happen to explain this, so I won’t have to.  Erin says that AEG was screwing Michael. I say AEG was protecting him.  My opinion, the contract was to protect Michael’s assets from Sony.  It was one of many other things done to protect Michael dating back to the trial. But we won’t know any of this for sure until it all plays out.

One thing I do know is that an awful lot of effort, money, time and manpower has been put into play to attack AEG on basically the same evidence that was presented at Michael’s 2005 trial.  This plan to attack AEG began before Michael was even taken.  Explain the articles about Michael’s career that came out THE SAME DAY HE DIED?  The date of the disclaimer on the TINI site a month before he died?  Sony, however, has been implicated by the man who was murdered himself, from his own mouth.

TINI DISCLAIMER Check May 26, 2009 Date at Bottom


That, Erin my dear, is why everyone is blaming Sony.  Because MICHAEL TOLD US who it was.

$ONY KILL$ MU$IC

Erin says the fans are being played (thanks for the confession) and she is right.  The only truthful statement she made in the whole time she was connected.  How many times is Erin going to ask what the beef is with Sony?  Did you ask MICHAEL that question?  No, of course not.  He was coincidentally KILLED two weeks before he could take possession of his music from Sony and walk away from them forever.  Never thought I’d see a fan aid and abet the murder of Michael.

Again with the fallacy of Michael working with Sony on the “Thriller 25th Anniversary”.   This was a contractual obligation.  The last of the albums Michael “owed” Sony.  If they keep repeating this lie I will keep reminding people, I don’t care how many times I have to do it.

Erin then says that Seven and David and Raven should educate the fans about Sony and Michael willingly working with Sony after they parted ways.  How any fan can suggest, after the years of torture that corporation put him through, that fans SUPPORT them is just beyond evil.  

Erin Jacobs agenda is as clear as Sony is crooked.    Host Catherine then suggests to Erin that they being to form groups (uh, isn’t this what originally got the fan base in trouble to begin with?) for self help?  We already have groups. People already get together and grieve together.  People already call and write each other and discuss.

Then an "LOL"  Moment -  Caller Taaj Malik calls in (I recognize her voice, she’s called me previously quite a few times, until that fateful 3am call http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/09/jacksons-know-even-if-deceivers-delude.html )  Taaj talks about the lying the media.  She should know. She’s perfected the art.   I can’t believe this.   

Sony must have a smaller cast than I thought. Taaj and Jacobs!  United in deception.  Taaj Malik suggests that people should just refuse to read anything out there (yes . . . anything.  How intelligent) and she suggested putting up a web site where we could get news (We have tons of those).  Then host Catherine suggests that you cannot stop people from buying and reading these things.  (Just like we cannot stop people from supporting Michael’s torturers by purchasing their album).  Members of TINI calling in to legitimize a radio call in show . . . this had me rolling all over this chair laughing.  I forgot the names but it doesn’t matter.  Just the fact that Taaj Malik called in and no one there recognized her voice and treated her like she was some unknown caller was enough to discredit the whole call.

What was surprising to me?  Erin Jacobs did not recognize Taaj’s voice.  After causing fights in front of the court house during Murray’s multiple pre-trials?  What alter-existence do these people live in to think that fans are going to buy this garbage?  Taaj, for those of you who have never been harassed with phone calls by her, is the first caller after Erin goes into an info-mercial about the virtues of Sony and she has the British accent.  Her picture is linked on the website linked above where she had herself photoshopped next to Joe Jackson after Twitter-spamming Taj Jackson and Randy Jackson with abusive tweets.

Next they try to sell us on the idea that boycotts don’t work.  What they DON’T tell you is that most boycotts never get to the point of the boycott.  Just the THREAT of a boycott and bad publicity is enough to cause a company or organization or publication to change their behavior.  That has worked with SEVERAL organizations just with the efforts of people from this blog alone!  They want to get groups of people together to “educate” them about AEG, then they MUST believe that power in numbers is effective.  This is the same argument TINI used and sites like Seven Bowie's supporting the "Boycott Sony" website sure left me scratching my head.  Seven?  (knock-knock) . . . Is that you?

The attack on Dr. Murray (who may or may not deserve it) is interesting.  The Host of the radio show believes that James Brown introduced Michael to Murray.  So now we have a third person that introduced the two.  So let’s assume along with everything else, that they don’t know what they are talking about here either. 

Charles Thomson then calls in.  Wow.  Talk about coincidental. Despite the fact that this “blog talk” radio show is in quite a different time zone as Charlie’s, he must have been “notified” that they wanted him to call in and of all the other callers waiting (we assume), they take his call at that time.  (Camera – action!)

Charles effectively explains that Murray was in fact NOT James Brown’s doctor.  Charles said he interviewed Brown’s widow a month ago and it just has not been aired yet. 

Charles also talks about a dark period in July of this year where “fans” and “conspiracy nuts” were attacking him and he was afraid to write anything about Michael Jackson.   This would not have happened if he hadn’t tried to cover up his past actions.  But as conspiracy nuts go, I guess it all depends on who the perpetrators of the conspiracy are as to whether one actually exists.  Thomson seemed perfectly comfortable talking to people who believed there was a conspiracy with AEG, so they all agree that one does indeed exist.  But to blame Sony?  They can't go there.  It would make too much sense.  Michael according  to Charles Thomson’s own standards, is a conspiracy nut.  Michael is on 60 Minutes talking about a conspiracy in 2003 after his arrest.  He talks about a conspiracy during his interview with Jesse Jackson after his arrest and during his trial.  Recorded phone conversations he talks about a conspiracy.

WHAT PART OF S-O-N-Y DON’T YOU UNDERSTAND???


Charles also said that one blog (hmmm) said that he was hired to attack AEG.  Maybe that was Muzik’s blog.  He said he never wrote anything about AEG, but he did, on LowlyNewshound.  The same blog entry where he talks about Michael hiding in a hotel room and AEG was making up stories to cover Michael’s behavior.

Both Raven and Seven talk about my blog (I have to assume it is my blog because they say “she” and that it was “okay” when “she” was first writing it, but then she went “off the rails” and Bowie said she contacted Charles to support him.  She had commented to me at the time that I “hit a nerve” with Charles.  Playing both sides of the fence does nothing for anyone’s credibility Seven, and neither does using fake names to hide your identity.  I know Muzik’s blog does not have the traffic that mine does, and didn’t exist before June.  The only other blog exposing Thomson was mine.

It is a crying shame that bolstering Sony’s self-created and deserved, rotting public image so that they can make money off of Michael’s album is more important to them than Michael himself.

As Jackie Jackson said, We know what’s going on . . . what’s REALLY going on.

Maybe Charles, Erin, Seven, Raven, David and Catherine, the fans got the idea of a conspiracy because they trust and believed Michael when HE implicated them in the conspiracy.

IGNORE-ant is a good word Host Catherine.  IGNORing Michael in his time of need and disregarding the words he wrote and spoke is not the actions of people that love him.  I am sorry.

As far as my blog being discredited . . . not according to my stats.  Keep sending me people.  Negative publicity is your employer’s M.O.  I know where I am in the search engines and I’m aware of the attempts to piggyback by getting people to post your links to my blog.  I will continue to put the truth out there and REMIND people of the treachery of what Sony did and continues to do to steal from Michael’s children even if I am the ONLY ONE reading this blog.  

For someone like Erin to spew online about how she wanted to “strangle” someone for what happened to Charles, her invite to me to join her group seemed even more disingenuous then when she first issued it to me when I exposed Taaj Malik.  I didn’t accept Stephanie Wilburn’s invite to be interviewed, I didn’t accept David Edward’s invitation to be interviewed and I did not accept Jacob’s invite to join her group.  When you’re fighting the devil, it’s best to decline offers from his minions for help.

Oops, yes we have confirmation!  Charles DOES mention my blog because he mentions the discrediting of Samantha and her fake pictures and Thomson is SURE that I was fruit loops over that one.  Well, how does HE know?   Oh let me guess . . . Sony told him . . . the people he’s never met yet gave him the interview with the marketing head honcho of Sony to write the review on the 25th Anniversary album.  So all this attention to lil’ ole me?  Granted I was at the end of the interview, but maybe they should pick theme.  Maybe they should get Michael to write their next script because it’s a lot more fun discovering the plot through his lyrics then through this pathetic display.

Charles says I lost ground over the Samantha incident.  I didn’t but of course the feed back I got and the fact they are even talking about this on blog radio tells me one thing for certain . . . they would be spending NO TIME on this if I was losing anything.  I never accused Charles of working with John Branca, I accused him of working for Sony or being related to someone in Sony.  Branca and Taraborrelli are admitted friends, and Charles and Taraborrelli are admitted friends but I didn’t even make the connection – until now.  You make up your own mind.  I control my blog the same way Charles controls his . . . only I never had need to shut mine down while I “fixed” things or shut down my facebook page.  What a bunch of foot-stomping cry babies.  You want people to believe you?

STOP LYING!!!!

Charles said my blog has descended into total madness.  What is total madness is repeating the same information, to the same people, with the same excuses and expecting people to think differently of you.  Charles disappears for two months and expects everyone to forget what happened.  Sounds so much like Sony trying to re-write their history with Michael is it any wonder we paired the two?  For someone who is no longer worried about me he sure spent the majority of his time on this call-in talking about me!

The fans have been played and they continue to be played.  This blog will not be used for that.  For this reason I will no longer accept posts that contain links to their blogs.  I can read them for myself if I need to find out what they are up to.

Sony does not care about Michael, they do not care about Michael’s children.  They are too busy working to undo the damage they did to Michael’s reputation to save the investment they made in doing so.  Rewarding them for 1993 through 2009 is not something I can advocate.

I can’t say that I didn’t see this coming.  The fighting between the groups was a definite and calculated diversion.  What surprised me though, is the scripted phone ins from Taaj Malik  and the mention of Nikki Alligator as an ally and Jacob’s little slip-up “we paid for voice authenticators”.  I really have to thank these people whenever they show their butts, because they reveal so much when they do.

Now on part one, I mentioned “cock-fighting” and said I would explain later.  Let’s change that to “dog fighting” since that was an example used on this radio show in regard to how much time Murray would spend time behind bars if convicted.

Dog fighting is a vicious act the spectators call a sport.  The objective of the crime (which is what it is) varies depending on which party in the crime you ask.  If you ask the dog, it is to survive (Erin Jacobs vs. Taaj Malik).  They don’t really hate each other, they are just doing a job for their owners.  The owners (their groups or followers) objective is to win and put the other one out of the fight, but there is a third entity.  That is the crime boss.  They own the facility in which they fight.  They own the “sport” so to speak. And what is their objective?

To make money.  How to they make money?

Attract paying spectators.

Good night and God Bless you.

Michael in This is It



For SandyK  You know what this is for




Younger Mike

87 comments:

  1. "Will.i.am tells EW, "Whoever put it out and is profiting off of it, I want to see how cold they are ... He just wasn't any ordinary artist. He was a hands-on person. To me it's disrespectful. There's no honoring."

    His biggest issue, it seems, is using unfinished MJ tracks -- something he feels the King of Pop never would have stood for: "Michael Jackson songs are finished when Michael says they’re finished ... Maybe if I never worked with him I wouldn’t have this perspective. He was very particular about how he wanted his vocals, the reverb he used ... he was that hands-on."

    Link http://foreign.peacefmonline.com/entertainment/201011/105217.php

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bonnie,
    I really am asking you to kindly help me understand. I have no problem here at passing for a total dumb - I simply don't get it.
    I have not listened to the blog talk radio on Friday night (well it was bight for me at least), am planning to do so asap, but honestly I was left speechless by this account of yours. It just does not add up, please help me understand!
    I follow Seven's Raven's and David's blogs (David's is not so much a blog as a website of course and has a slightly different approach, I find it very helpful) as well as yours, and in all honesty, Seven has never changed her stance towards $sony, she is very adamant on not wanting to buy the album (nor the DVD box or any other Michael-related itmes), and she certainly never cut $sony any slack.... and the same goes for Raven, as far as I see, so really - and please believe me, I am asking this with my heart on my sleeve, no sarcasm or distrust or anything - I trust you totally, I simply am very confused right now. Help please?

    L.O.V.E.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I enjoyed this video and wanted to post it here. I always enjoy hearing Michael's voice!!!! I know everyone here does too.

    YouTube video: “Michael Jackson – Epitome Of Artistry”

    “Great music and great melodies are imortal.” – Michael Jackson

    “That’s what drives me. The medium. The art. I love it. That’s the world I’m most comfortable with.” – Michael Jackson

    “You can’t teach it. It has to come from inside. It’s a gift.” – Michael Jackson

    “I just love working on a song, putting it to gether, sweating over it, and then sharing it with people and having them love it. And I always pray that they like it. That’s what gives me great satisfaction as an artist.” – Michael Jackson

    Source:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4Sg_A0A16c&feature=player_embedded#!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear Bonnie,

    I used to listen to Catherine Gross show on blogtalkradio, but since this last show I will no longer listen.
    I really thought she was a true fan of Michael and that she understood all the pain he endured, but she does not and Seven also, I thought she loved Michael.

    I stick with the old Michael albums I have.
    I am doing my own Sony boycott, telling all the people I know not to buy anything Sony, especially the fake Michael albums (Ted Riley sated that Sony is going to launch another one, this time a Michael duets album) http://www.legendarymichaeljackson.nl/?p=2135

    This is so awful, when will they stop?

    I am here for you always.
    KEEP ON THE GOOD WORK.
    LYM
    AnaPassionHeart

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hello Bonnie,

    You are well-alive & it's good to see you back in full force !

    Only unhappy to hear (not new) that some questionable people & blogs prevented you lately to work more sererely on your blog. Your comments today help me again to be also more vigilant from now before signing any petition in the name of Michael. Just I don't regret the E-Mails I addressed to ITV & Ofcom re : K. McKenzie's case - that was for Michael & his kids only.

    Bonnie "He was coincidentally KILLED two weeks before he could take possession of his music from Sony and walk away from them forever."

    "Coincidentally" yes.... But then why did Michael re-hire John Branca a week or so before his death ? was it willingly (!) or was he "brought" to do so ? I still don't get it, especially when he felt somehow threatened.

    Bonnie "AEG’s contract is something I never had a chance to go over".

    In view of the recent developments, I understand you refrained from doing so, but it's worth reading it sometime, I think : I found it somewhat also abusive.

    Nevertheless, the original cause of Michael's death is indeed ..."Sony kills". If they had cooperated with Michael properly during his lifetime instead of attempting to destroy this beautiful artist, he would not only still be alive but wouldn't have been obliged to sign the AEG concerts pushed by his accrued financial necessity lately.

    I bring nothing new here I know. But I will continue to only listen to my favourite songs of Michael during his lifetime : these count to me. The other ones in store were for his children to agree to display later, not for Sony. I only hope for Michael & MJ3 that, soon or late, when Justice comes back, it will be in full force, like a boomerang.

    ReplyDelete
  6. So much is spinning in my mind right now I think I'm going to fall over. Mottola was asked by Matt Lauer on the Today show recently who owns Michael's music? Mottola replies that Sony does. Lauer askes, who gets the profits from that music, Sony or the Estate? Mottola says that both do. He then clarifies by saying that the Estate will recieve royalties from Michael's music. He doesn't say what the break down of that is. I wished Lauer had pressed him on this. Concidering Mottola's history as a senior executive in the industry he knows EXACTLY what the estate gets and what Sony gets, and Sony will get a disproportionate amount of that profit. The $200 million contract that was signed earlier this year I believe is peanuts compared to what Sony will make over many years of marketing Michael's music accross any number of venues whether it be advertising, games, licensing of clothing, etc.

    I found it offensive to listen to Mottola praising Michael's gifts as a multi-talented entertainer. He continues by saying that Michael was the greatest entertainer that he has ever encountered. Michael more than diserves the praise but Mottola, to me, comes across as a sleezy intellectual thief who has just helped to "steal" the "crown jewels" and is smuggly bragging about it. His aloofness and arogance is palpable as he talks up Michael's music and states that he is the "gatekeeper" to that same music!?!? This man makes me physically ill!!! Somebody restrain me because I simply can't take it anymore!!!! Unless I'm missing something, Lauer never once pointed out that Mottola was removed from his position at Sony due to Michael's influence. And rightly so!!! This is the only person that Michael publically vilified as currupt in his dealings. A man that Michael compared to the "Devil!" For Sony, Michael is finally gone. With out that tenatious thorn in their side, they can now pillage the "treasury" and throw scraps back to Michael's beneficiaries...:-( Highway robbery! Pure and simple!!

    Bonnie said, "The date of the disclaimer on the TINI site a month before he died?"

    I'm not convinced of the signifance of this date (May 26, 2009). For this reason. This group had members following Michael around who allege that Michael was complaining about the number of concerts and alleging that Michael didn't appear well to them. If they are to be believed, they claim that they were giving him letters, or trying to, expressing their concerns to him and those around him such as Karen Faye. They claim they were being kept away from him in the last week or 2 of his life. However, there is another side to the story that implies that Michael was finding these individuals intrusive, and by at least one account, rough with his children on at least one occasion, resulting in him asking his security to create more of a wall between him and these particular individuals. It's clear they already had it in their minds before Michael's death that there was something seriously wrong with this concert endeavor weeks before he died, whether true or not. We knew the concert series was going to be called "This Is It" from March 2009, so the fact that they named their campaign "This Is Not It" doesn't surprise me that much. However, I do agree that the sourcing/funding of the website is still greatly disturbing to me. The site has a copyright attributed to it along with a legal diclaimer. Clearly, those things don't come for free. Who paid for it??? Sony??? Certainly not AEG.

    Yes, Michael did tell us who it was. I wonder what more he knew that he didn't say publically, or could only infer. Will we ever know?...:-(

    ReplyDelete
  7. (Continued)

    Bonnie said, concerning Erin Jacobs, "Never thought I’d see a fan aid and abet the murder of Michael."

    Repectfully Bonnie, I can't support this comment. I can fault Erin for being naive and ignorant, and perhaps of being used by Sony, perhaps. But not aiding in a murder. It's too serious of a claim and can't be proven. In order to aide in such a thing, you have to have knowledge of it's potential in advance. The only thing I see her guilty of is misguided and misplaced loyalties, NOT intent to aide in murder.

    Bonnie said, "Again with the fallacy of Michael working with Sony on the “Thriller 25th Anniversary”. This was a contractual obligation."

    Yes. This was an obligation, not a willing choice. He had no choice concerning his back catalog. Through out the 2000's, greatest hits packages were being released and re-released through Sony simply because they still owned it, and still wanted to market it. Michael was not going to release new music with them. Sadly, his "new" music, if you will, is now being marketed by the very corporation he parted ways with before the rights to previously released music could revert to the estate. All too convenient.

    Concerning forming groups, I agree. We already have numerous groups. People can create more groups certainly, but what good would more do??? I was very confused by this.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks for posting both sets of images at the end of your post. These are part of the same photo shoot, although different wardrobe, done by Albert Watson in 1999 of a 41 yr. old Michael. He looks AMAZING! What appears to be an "older" Michael is an illusion due to lighting that enhances the contours and hollows in his face. Certainly he had a deeply contoured face, although not wrinkled, despite the apparent loose skin at his neck and jaw line, which is simply a result of the way he is turning his head. The black and white image enhances the shadowing further along with the angle he is holding his head. However, I do see why you think he looks older. The "older" Michael above and the middle images of the "younger" Michael below are all in the 12 row series Watson did in 1999 that is on his portfolio page.

    I know I've been focusing attention on this, but at the end of the day, this issue is not a show-stopper.

    Image breakdown in detail:
    http://justmythoughts-sandyk.blogspot.com/2010/11/blog-post_13.html

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dear Bonnie,
    Im happy too see your back and and with lots of energy.I know you missed your computer and was quite miserable without it(I wanted to give you a hug so bad) you sounded miserable. Let me say, your words seem more painful, powerful and it exudes MJ spirit. Yes you are michaelsguardian!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I have to agree with will.i.am as regards to Michael's music. Michael has been writing, singing and producing his own albums for 20 years. So for me, unfinished or demo tracks of Michael's voice fleshed out by other people in the way they 'think Michael would have done it' is NOT a Michael Jackson album.
    Can you imagine it happening in the art world? If someone took a half-finished Picasso and let several other artists loose on it to 'finish' and sell it as a Picasso? There would be uproar!!

    ReplyDelete
  11. BTW, sorry for taking up so much space today. I had lots on my mind that I wanted to share. I'll be good and be quiet for a while...;-)

    ReplyDelete
  12. Dear Bonnie,
    This article shows what Mj was doing the last years of his life, Running trying too stay alive.
    This makes me angry as hell, Mj staying in a hotel for months because Of "security guard issiues" Mj was scared for his life I will never understand how this could happen.

    http://www.lasvegassun.com/blogs/kats-report/2010/nov/12/michael-jacksons-artistic-differences-while-record/

    ReplyDelete
  13. Dear Bonnie,

    Look at this picture and video!
    http://dipdive.com/member/iamwill/pictures/51315

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRjvp1zja7E

    ReplyDelete
  14. Dear Bonnie,

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Chandler

    ReplyDelete
  15. Dear Bonnie,
    I found some videos on Thomme and he claimed to be the Ambasador of Senagal according to the news. However I read back over Akons bio and he has connections to Senagal, as well as trinidad where famous Dr. murray is from and Jersey city where Evan Chandler "committed suicide". It may be far fetched but Im just sayin. However his bio now states Newark, New jersey when before it stated Jersey City, New Jersey. It's been changed! hmmmmm

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3eyBiYH2q9E

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3eyBiYH2q9E

    ReplyDelete
  16. What a read but worth every word!! I thank god for your blog!!! It is the only one I turn too. It is alway well written and very insightful. I love that you get right to the point and cut through all the BS especially with all the INSANITY that is currently taking place. Please keep doing what you because you do it well!!

    Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Dear Bonnie,

    This is the vibe Akon and MJ had in the studio! Its hard too read but youll get it!

    http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=90250

    ReplyDelete
  18. Dear bonnie,

    Akon on MJ concert (This is it).

    http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=12957

    ReplyDelete
  19. Bonnie – thank you for this post. You really did a fantastic job analyzing what was said in that blog talk radio to the core. I listened to it but there were many important things I have missed. One of them is when Erin said “we have had a voice authenticator, O’Reily, The estate....” Why Erin would say “WE” folks? This statement by itself would put her into suspicious category that she might be a spokes person for Sony working undercover to divert attention from Michael’s lifelong enemy, Sony.

    I am thinking all day long how come those so called fans who claim they love Michael so much could not even see the pain and anguish he went through with Sony? Michael told us in many, many ways and in his speeches and interviews how certain people were conspiring against him to kill him. What he told us was way before AEG came into the picture. How come it was forgotten? I thought being his fan means being close to what he thought us and remembering what he told us how the music industry trying their best to discredit him and put him out of business.

    continued.....

    ReplyDelete
  20. If some of you out there forgot the pain Michael endured while he was working with Sony, please go back and listen and read what he said and refresh your memory. I know some of us have short memory and that’s why I suggest re-learning about Michael and his relationship with music industry so we can better defend him and bring justice to his untimely death that was inflicted by those who conspired against him for so long.

    Folks, Michael was not only abused by the media but also by MUSIC INDUSTRY he helped make BILLION dollars. This should not be forgotten. Yes, many Michael Jackson bloggers and justice groups and the general fans talk about how Michael was/is abused by the media but none of them talk about how he was abused by the music industry except this blog. Why? Any answer.

    ReplyDelete
  21. First, to everyone (including MJ and my passed over son, Luke, whom I had a little conversation with on the way to my Dad's house about it all) who wished my ailing Father and I well... THANK YOU!!! As for how things are going? So far...so good at this time. Yes, he's a little shaky, he's underweight, and we STILL are not exactly certain as to the results of the med tests he's had. However, contrary to the Dr's opinion of "dementia"-- I have to question this. He seemed pretty darned "with it" and lucid to me. (Thanks MJ-- you're the "expert" there.) My Dad ate very well-- he even got up OUT of his bed on his own power, got dressed on his own, was social, and sat to eat at his kitchen table. All were contrary to the reports that I was getting from a family friend who checks in regularly on him. She wondered how I "did that" and I simply reminded her that it just could've been the mere presence of "the gosh darned Kid" (as he has called me over the years) in the house! LOL! But yes... he is obviously in need of a visiting nurse. So, such will be arranged.

    Now...as for the past 2 blog entries: While I too believe that there is only ONE enemy regarding Michael and that being the Sony/Branca connection, I DID resent Tommy Mattola STILL thinking that he has some form of influence over "all things Michael" directly linked to his "being the gatekeeper". Okay, thinking caps on!!! The gatekeepers to the gates of Hell are also known as "the hounds of Hell) and are allegedly rottweilers. So...is Mattola a rottweiler? YES albeit indirectly (at least on the surface and YES... I say he needs watching because there's more to his boast than we may have thought in recent days). So, who is the OTHER rottweiler? Duh... can we say Branca and the Estate???

    The problem here is that the Jackson FAMILY for the most part still believes Branca and Co. to be the "good guys." Worse, they have turned to them in the sense of McClain regarding the issues about "Michael." Uh... See my point here???

    Now, as for the "fan wars" I don't get involved with that outside the fact that yes... I believe Taaj to be as dangerous and lethal as "Resident Evil". Do I believe in the whole Sony is the "good guys" bit? NO WAY! But, I still admit to having a problem with ALL of Sony being guilty. I believe the "bad apple in the barrel" over there is Martin Bandier, but not all of Sony. Why? When you follow the history of the ATV catalog, lurking in the shadows continuously ever since losing it to Michael, there has been Bandier!!! And, does Bandier truly give a good darn about Sony? NO!!! His ONLY concern to the point of OBSESSION is the ATV. Sorry Marty, but your "history" proves it. Bottom line. As much as Muzik likes to portray Branca as "the Godfather", I believe that's a total error. The TRUE "Godfather" is Bandier and people need to open their eyes to this.

    Do I believe in "boycott Sony"? NO. Do I believe in "boycott the new releases?" NO. WHY, in spite of all of the controversy would I NOT boycott??? A.) Michael HISTORY 101. And, my personal giggle here being that even though no longer in human flesh, Michael J. Jackson is STILL able to generate interest and controversy. B.) "It's easier to catch flies with honey-- rather than vinegar." Meaning: "If money is all that they love... than that is all that they will receive." Ulterior Motive: I want them to choke themselves on it all!!! So, with these things in mind, there is NO "reward" here at all. Not in my mindedness. It's a sweetening of their favorite dessert and lacing it with arsenic. LOL!

    Hugz...

    ReplyDelete
  22. Simo said - "Seven has never changed her stance towards $sony, she is very adamant on not wanting to buy the album (nor the DVD box or any other Michael-related itmes), and she certainly never cut $sony any slack.... and the same goes for Raven, as far as I see, so really - and please believe me, I am asking this with my heart on my sleeve,"

    I believe you, I read those blogs too, which is why the fact that NONE OF THEM even contested Erin during this call shocked the living daylights out of me, then attack MY BLOG as the crazy one. There is NO WAY that Seven, as a graphic artist, can authenticate Samantha's photos and have any credibility with me. Many others saw what I saw. Raven's blog is probably a little less volatile than Seven's in regard to her views on the business side of Michael's story, but she seems to promote the "Michael, the drug addict" character on her blog. I have had NO PROBLEMS with any of them, even with those disagreements. This radio show, and the advocating Erin's rant on Sony's behalf leaves me with two possiblities:

    They have no backbone or

    They are in on it.

    David is the only one that even remotely disagreed with Erin's views on Sony and he was next to the last speaker. I hope that helps you understand. I know it is a long interview and it took me almost all day between phone calls to get through it. Thanks Simo.

    ReplyDelete
  23. SandyK said - "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4Sg_A0A16c&feature=player_embedded#!"

    >>>>My God. I want to do a blog update just on this video alone. There are times when you feel your heart swell inside your chest to the point where it feels to big to keep inside and viewing this video is one of those times. You know what this video reminded me of?

    "I can do all things through Christ which strengthens me..." Philippians 4:13 That verse was the first verse I memorized the first week I spent in Christian school and I wrote it on the second page of my little white Bible with the gold lettering. (Memories...) The year I was saved.

    Let God just take over. How can anyone not love that message?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anapassion said - "I really thought she was a true fan of Michael and that she understood all the pain he endured, but she does not and Seven also, I thought she loved Michael."

    >>>> There is a line I want to try not to cross. I agree with you. I question their motives but I don't know enough about them personally to say they are NOT fans. They are misleading fans and their misguided suggestions that fans will hurt Michael's children if they don't purchase from Sony is damaging. I would never come out and accuse someone of hating another, but I DO QUESTION this whole turn of events. It breaks your heart. I shared things with Seven that I now wish I hadn't. Live and learn. Sony's little monopoly on Michael they will soon learn . . .they are digging their own hole. Let them have their fun. It won't last.
    ------------------------------------------

    LineCH said - "Just I don't regret the E-Mails I addressed to ITV & Ofcom re : K. McKenzie's case - that was for Michael & his kids only."

    <<<<You have a couple of issues in your comment. No, never regret the letters you send in to defend Michael. Absolutely keep writing in. The petitions I sign them if I agree with them, but I really don't know what good they do. I believe personal letters are more effective.

    On the issue of Branca being hired back, like I said in a previous blog, I suspect that Sony brought him in, not Michael. I also strongly feel that Michael's reluctance to come to rehearsals had a lot to do with him showing up there to "observe" Michael. Think about what had been going on ever since knowlege of this concert was learned. Michael was being STALKED almost as soon as he got back to the states. The last eight months before he died, on a daily basis, even back and forth to doctor's visits. Branca, Faye and possibly others coming in to work on this concert are brought in by Sony STRONG EVIDENCE because it was conditional of the contract AEG may have had with Sony to use Michael's songs for this concert. I WANT TO SEE THIS CONTRACT, because that would tell us what the conditions were. Michael's concerts wouldn't even start until after Michael's songs reverted back to him. Michael is killed on June 25th?

    Also think about this. AEG contract with Michael was leaked online. Now if the press and AEG were in bed with each other, would AEG have allowed that? No, which is why I suspect that this was either a calculated move or it is a fake to implicate AEG.

    ReplyDelete
  25. SandyK said - "I found it offensive to listen to Mottola praising Michael's gifts as a multi-talented entertainer. He continues by saying that Michael was the greatest entertainer that he has ever encountered. "

    Mottola is in a precarious position. When he said that during the interview I don't know . . . thought he was smarter than that. That interview connected a lot of dots for fans. Thanks for that Tommy.

    On TINI and the disclaimer date, I am convinced of the significance of that date. I am a previous web consultant and web marketing company owner. Disclaimers are usually dated, even if they copied and pasted from the source they purchased use of the disclaimer (it's a legal document of sorts) that date would be the date they took it out, IF IT IS LEGITIMATE.

    In order for the organization of the TINI groups internationally, the press and articles that were published on June 25th, and the "letters" produced for the press stating these stalkers gave letters to Michael to have been produced or written the day they say they wrote them, they would have had to have been ready to go before June 25th.

    The friend of mine that I called when I saw the letter concerning this radio show has quite a collection of news articles published on June 25th that could not have been written the same day if any research for the article was done. This stuff was ready to go. Someone knew what was going to happen.

    ReplyDelete
  26. SandyK said - "Repectfully Bonnie, I can't support this comment. I can fault Erin for being naive and ignorant, and perhaps of being used by Sony, perhaps. But not aiding in a murder. It's too serious of a claim and can't be proven. In order to aide in such a thing, you have to have knowledge of it's potential in advance. "

    Isn't it great that you are not required to support everything I say in order to post here? (Okay, I'm being facetious). She accused fans of stabbing Michael in the back for not supporting this album, asked what the beef was with Sony. Aiding, abetting and financing the torture of Michael? Would you feel that would be more accurate?

    On the contractual obligations you just echoed something I said earlier and THIS is the propaganda they are confusing the fans with.
    ---------------------------------------------

    SandyK said - "He looks AMAZING! What appears to be an "older" Michael is an illusion due to lighting that enhances the contours and hollows in his face."

    I maintain they are different photos. Why? Because one of the photos in the earlier (color?) photos resembles the same angle of the head that Michael exhibits in the black and white photo I posted. There is more but I have to crop and blow them up and I can do that in between other duties on this blog. My concern? The difference in the texture of the skin. However this is not as important an issue and certainly will not bring Michael justice. :o)

    ReplyDelete
  27. Marvelousmary said - "Im happy too see your back and and with lots of energy.I know you missed your computer and was quite miserable without it(I wanted to give you a hug so bad) you sounded miserable. "

    Awwww! Hug accepted, unless you are taking it back, LOL! I was frustrated but not really miserable. I knew the whole process was a necessary inconvenience. I'm glad I'm back too. ♥♥♥
    ---------------------------------------------

    Princessglam said - "...unfinished or demo tracks of Michael's voice fleshed out by other people in the way they 'think Michael would have done it' is NOT a Michael Jackson album.
    Can you imagine it happening in the art world? If someone took a half-finished Picasso and let several other artists loose on it to 'finish' and sell it as a Picasso? There would be uproar!! "

    Wow. What a great analogy! You are absolutely right. That makes so much sense! Are you GETTING ANY OF THIS? SONY???
    ---------------------------------------------

    Marvelousmary said - "This article shows what Mj was doing the last years of his life, Running trying too stay alive."

    >>>> I tried to pull up the link but I got a "404" error. Fans need to realize that buying Sony's album (because it is NOT Michael's!) is financing the HORROR they put Michael through.

    Not to mention that this lame, inconsiderate and DISRESPECTFUL argument these ladies have used about Michael's legacy . . . let's get ONE THING STRAIGHT! (how's that, Spotlight, LOL!) Given a choice between having MICHAEL BACK or his LEGACY which do you think his children would choose?

    Sony seems to want to labor under the DELUSION that EVERYONE has the same value system they do. THANKFULLY that is not the case!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Marvelousmary said - "Look at this picture and video!
    http://dipdive.com/member/iamwill/pictures/51315

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRjvp1zja7E "

    >>>>These are divine!!! Wil.i.am is one of the FEW recording artists that have very adamantly defended not just Michael but his principles. I have the utmost respect for Wil.i.am and his story about Father's day broke my heart. I tried to find it on youtube but couldn't. Anyone have it? My bookmarks on those are MILES long.

    Wikipedia - The problem with this site, even though I also use them if other sources are listed and verifiable, is that anyone can edit wikipedia articles. Evan Chandler did not get $20mil . . . his son did. Evan got $1.5 or thereabouts as did June Chandler. Where Evan got the rest of his money to support his lifestyle and multiple surgeries is anyone's guess. Interesting info on Tohme and Akon. I love Akon's duet with Michael. Even more interesting is that Tohme and Al Waleed have a connection to the country of Lebanon. Al Waleed has a residence there and Tohme is Lebanese as is Thom Barrack.

    Thank you for posting these sources. ♥
    ----------------------------------------------

    @EileenG - Thank you twice! ♥

    ReplyDelete
  29. Lady said - "The problem here is that the Jackson FAMILY for the most part still believes Branca and Co. to be the "good guys." Worse, they have turned to them in the sense of McClain regarding the issues about "Michael." Uh... See my point here??? "

    I will keep praying for your father. My grandfather had dementia too and although in the beginning it seemed the symptoms were sporadic they worsened with him. But he was 93 years old.

    I don't know what it is you have against the Jackson family, but you seem to forget the original challenge to the executors. Right now they have to play ball. Please back off of them because I will not go round with you on this, I will only refuse to publish attacks on the Jackson's. There is an investigation. You want to condemn the undercover agents as well as the criminals . . . give it time.

    Bandier did not work for Sony when Sony began pulling their crap with Michael, so no, it wasn't always Bandier. He is heavily involved, Branca, Mottola, who was the henchman of the early 2000's, but Sony is STILL working to undermine Michael, his family, the fans and Michael's children. We also seem to forget that MICHAEL JACKSON is not the only artist that has been SCREWED by this company. He's only the highest profiled artist and the ONLY ONE who stood up to them.

    Who put Bandier in charge of the Sony/ATV over at Sony Lady? It certainly wasn't Michael now was it? Who's kept Tommy in the loop and "the gatekeeper" of Michael's music? Michael? I'm betting NO.

    I have no idea why you think Sony "choking" on money would deter them from doing this to anyone else. You'll have to explain that to me because I am of the opinion that you DON'T reward the bad guys.

    ReplyDelete
  30. "Tracklisting for the new mj albumMICHAEL ALBUM TRACKLISTING:1. Hold My Hand (Duet with Akon)2. Hollywood Tonight 3. Keep Your Head Up 4. (I Like) The Way You Love Me5. Monster (Featuring 50 Cent)6. Best Of Joy7. Breaking News8. (I Can’t Make It) Another Day (Featuring Lenny Kravitz)9. Behind The Mask10. Much Too Soon"

    This is thanks to Helena.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Hi Bonnie, I found the blogradio show quite interesting until it devolved into the Erin Jacobs show, then I moved ahead to Thomson's part. Personally, I think the moderator, Catherine, needs to get "up to speed" and keep it all moving forward beyond a snail's pace. And she doesn't need to giggle over these very serious subjects. Interesting observations by all.

    This will sound informal as I have to leave for work. Bonnie, respectfully, you should read Michael's contract with AEG, as you say it was leaked on line, there's a copy with RADAR ONLINE all over it, and then there's the copy in Rowe's book, maybe those are the only two copies available to the public, who knows. Radar's copy is so redacted as to be nearly unreadable, Rowe's is far less redacted, and BOTH COPIES ARE THE SAME, imo. I don't believe Michael would have knowingly signed this contract or anything remotely resembling it! Yet his signature, or what purports to be his signature, is all over the document. Some of the signatures (there are 7 or 8 in different places) are NOT Michael's signature, imo.

    About the TINI disclaimer date, I believe I posted sometime back that this disclaimer, and it's date, is a free boilerplate disclaimer with a canned date of May 26, 2009. In other words, anyone can pull it up, print it off and attach it to their document. Googling the word disclaimer brought up the site; I offer this just as information, not to prove or disprove anything. Perhaps sites use predated disclaimers all the time and we just don't know it.

    I love Wil.I.Am. Appears to be a really upfront guy who respects Michael's genius and legacy and let's hope he sticks with it. And I love the song Hold My Hand but I'm still not buying the album, as I don't want any more tears as I listen, and look at Michael's picture, which just happened this morning.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Bonnie, I'm shocked. I have been following both Seven and Raven's blogs now for ages. Seven in particular has always expressed suspicion and contempt for Sony's treatment of Michael. Your "lack of backbone" comment may truly be a correct one, I hope.

    As for the fans being played. I suspect that the host, Catherine Gross herself is being played. She seems to be collecting an assortment of Michael Jackson experts and I suspect many of them are working hard at their celebrity status. I know for a fact that she has had as a guest on her show a particular lady who started up a website some time back with the help of many MJ admirers who now likes to positon herself for public speaking etc and takes all credit. I suspect that Catherine Gross thinks that she is performing a great service but is way too naive to really know what she is up against.

    Charles Thompson - aka Twistedvision/Lowly Newshound. I am sick to death of the so called MJ Community who still think that he's the only journalist capable of defending Michael. I can and never will forgive him. Anybody who has read any of his posts on MJStar should be ashamed to have anything further to do with it. You cannot be an admirer of Michael Jackson the person and support this creature - it just does not reconcile.

    There are many out there who consider themselves well educated and well versed who support him strongly. What on earth are their motives? Do they walk around with blindfolds on? He can't be much of a journalist if this is the best he is doing with his career. The guy's going nowhere fast which is probably one reason why he is revisiting Michael yet again. I see him as an unwelcome intruder.

    Okay - for me the date on the TINI website is the most compelling evidence in existence that something was going on prior to Michael's death. TINI must have been organised for months before June to get its website up and running. This certainly does appear to be an anti AEG campaign BUT if that was the case then it was also an ANTI MICHAEL CAMPAIGN because we're talking about Michael's concerts here. His most important concert really because it was his big big comeback.

    How could MJ fans justify destroying his concert while Michael was still alive? There are so many things which can be read into his date. I am totally bewildered by it.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Bonnie,

    Here is the link where Will.i.am speaks about
    Michael "He'd call me up for father's day because he knew I didn't have a dad - he was something else
    Will.i.am"
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8123506.stm

    Will.i.am is one of the few real and true friends.

    LYM
    Anapassionheart

    ReplyDelete
  34. Bonnie, I have to read, and then re read because there is so much information. I am just a Fan of MJ trying to follow all of of this. What I feel is hurting Michael's good name are the people out here I refer to as 'CON~FANS'.. As ladyaquarius stated..'I believe Taaj to be as dangerous and lethal as "Resident Evil"'.. Yes, I am labeling her 'CON~FAN' #1 along with those who are attached her.. Samantha&CO. that entire group is a mixture of *LIARS, THIEFS, STALKERS*, #2, and they are just as bad, JUSTICE4MJ administrators Erin and Amy. I feel that Erin is the Dangerous one in this DUO.. They too, feel they are too smart not to get caught because they have been able to fool the REAL grieving FANS. #3, SEVEN BOWIE. After following her and believing in her for over a year because she started out lightly, and was very convincing, I now feel I want to know WHO SEVEN BOWIE really is.. It is a great Pseudo, using Michael's favorite number and her favorite rocker's names combined. BUT, the question is; WHO IS THE REAL SEVEN BOWIE??? WHAT IS HER AGENDA? Am I the only one who thinks it has changed? WHO IS SHE REALLY??? Obviously, she feels the need to hide behind an Alias.. She too, has successfully seduced Michael's Fans and gained credibility as a FAN and one who CARES.. Does she really, or is this just a job she is being paid to do??? The other Bloggers, David uses his real identity, and Raven, I don't know.. Michael's death has brought out names and faces in the world of Bloggers who have been unheard of before June 25th, or mostly unheard of to the heights they have set for themselves on the tears of the Fans..The one who disturbs me the most is Taaj Malik and that group she posts pictures with. I personally feel it is time to EXPOSE her and her WRITTEN WORDS to the the Jackson Family. We all know in the realm of their suffering Taaj Malik is less than a speck of sand. I get migraines when I see her posts come across the FB Feed.. I am extremely disturbed her name was attached to the Sunflowers for Michael Group and don't know HOW or WHY that happened. As a donor to that group, I feel I must excuse myself after already making a DEC. donation because Taaj Malik's name tarnishes the purpose. I know that is is my opinion only.. The saying 'Why can't we just get along' will never happen. I don't know if Erin and Taaj are playing the fans, and reality is they are all in this together, I don't believe this to be true. Huyla and Muzik have done a pretty good job of exposing Taaj and she continues to have followers. Is this simply 'What Part of STUPID' do MJ's hurting fans not understand when it comes to Taaj Malik. There is something about someone like her who has been exposed and it does not bother her in the least. She just starts a new page and keeps on her self serving path. I see Taaj Malik as the 'Bernie Maloff' of the Michael Jackson grieving fans. She continues to take and ask for more. In that light, the Justice4MJ are in the same category. I almost think the Attorney General of Calif. should investigate BOTH of these groups. I feel Both are partners in Crime and other No Good Deeds when it comes to Michael Jackson. Anyone feel the same way??? When people continue to ask for money and there is no oversight, except their own.. that is definitely a problem in the Fan Base. I know I have asked alot, but in wrapping this up: *How can Taaj Malik and Erin Jacobs be gotten rid of and WHO IS SEVEN BOWIE?????

    ReplyDelete
  35. Mimi said, "Yes, many Michael Jackson bloggers and justice groups and the general fans talk about how Michael was/is abused by the media but none of them talk about how he was abused by the music industry except this blog. Why? Any answer."

    Great question!

    **********************************************
    Bonnie said, "SandyK said - "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4Sg_A0A16c&feature=player_embedded#!"

    >>>>My God. I want to do a blog update just on this video alone. There are times when you feel your heart swell inside your chest to the point where it feels to big to keep inside and viewing this video is one of those times."

    I'm looking forward to that update Bonnie!!! Also, don't forget to share your dream about Jesus, remember?...:-)

    ReplyDelete
  36. Bonnie said, "In order for the organization of the TINI groups internationally, the press and articles that were published on June 25th, and the "letters" produced for the press stating these stalkers gave letters to Michael to have been produced or written the day they say they wrote them, they would have had to have been ready to go before June 25th."

    Yes. I think that is where I repectfully don't understand your point. They had been following him around, and in an intrusuve way of course, for a number of months, 8 to be exact, but that was the point I was making. This group was already of the mind set weeks prior to his death that something was wrong. Certainly the day of his death caused an immense emotional outpouring and it doesn't surprise me that they wanted to have their say concerning what they thought they observed. I don't believe they knew he was going to die in advance. I really don't. BTW, I realize I'm walking a fine line here and I don't mean to seem like I support TINI. I don't. I'm offended by aggressive, self-serving tendancy of some of their members and of course we don't know who is paying for the site or how these individuals were able to afford to follow someone around for days and weeks at a time. Do they not have jobs? Families? Anyway, forgive my slowness, I'm still not seeing the significance of the date.

    Also, although I haven't seen all the articles in quesiton for June 25, I respectfully don't agree with the idea that it wouldn't be possible to right an article the same day. If someone is a journalist by trade, and has been following and writing about the entertainment industry for any length, and there were many that wrote on Michael and his activities, those individuals will have certain knowledge in their minds at a moments notice, including his recent activities.

    As for the letters, they were written before June 25, of course. These adult women, who seem to have no jobs or families, became alarmed because their access to him was being curtailed. I guess I can see where their emotions would start to run high and assume sinister things in the works. They couldn't see the entire picture. Their perspective was very narrow as a result, and still is.

    Please know that my comments and disagreements are said with respect, love and kindness.

    Respectfully yours,
    Sandy

    ReplyDelete
  37. Bonnie said, "Isn't it great that you are not required to support everything I say in order to post here? (Okay, I'm being facetious). She accused fans of stabbing Michael in the back for not supporting this album, asked what the beef was with Sony. Aiding, abetting and financing the torture of Michael? Would you feel that would be more accurate?"

    The fact that you have been respectful and courtious when I've disagreed is why I've stayed. You've NEVER been rude or agressive to me or anyone else who has disagreed with you in a respectful manor. This speaks very well of you.

    Another and very different reason that I stick with this blog is that you haven't attacked Michael's family. Too many do that too easily. Internal family dynamics can be very difficult to interpret from the outside looking in. Too much can be misinterpreted and often has with the Jackson family. Thank you for giving them that space.

    Back to Erin...when I faulted her for being ignorant, the Sony issue is exactly what I'm referencing. It's as if she's totally tuned out anything Michael said about them. Where has she been? And yes, although I neglected to mention it before, I did note how she used the term "we" in regards to Sony and the voice authenticators. Very curious slip up. Anyway, I find her to be something of a nuisance and a media hound. She hogged a lot of time on that radio show and commentors did write in to complain about it.

    I'm glad you took the word "murder" out.

    **********************************************

    Bonnie said, "I maintain they are different photos. Why? Because one of the photos in the earlier (color?) photos resembles the same angle of the head that Michael exhibits in the black and white photo I posted. There is more but I have to crop and blow them up and I can do that in between other duties on this blog. My concern? The difference in the texture of the skin. However this is not as important an issue and certainly will not bring Michael justice. :o)"

    True. It won't bring Michael justice. I'm willing to let it go and respectfully agree to disagree...:-)

    Moving on...:-)

    ReplyDelete
  38. Princessglam said, "...unfinished or demo tracks of Michael's voice fleshed out by other people in the way they 'think Michael would have done it' is NOT a Michael Jackson album.
    Can you imagine it happening in the art world? If someone took a half-finished Picasso and let several other artists loose on it to 'finish' and sell it as a Picasso? There would be uproar!! "

    Absolutely!!!! Not that it solves the problem, but they need to identify the tracks that have been completed be someone else and to what degree that completion was done. For "Breaking News," for example, they need to fess up to how much of it is Michael's voice and exactly where someone else is filling in. Apparently there is a note concerning another vocalist but I'd want to know the exact breakdown of that vocal. I want to know what I'm paying for, in a matter of speaking, if I was buying it. Is it fully Picasso? Or is it partially Picasso then finished by his art students? Actually, that's not an unusual practice in the art world...but anyway, original point is well taken.

    BTW, Taj Jackson says that the new "Hold Your Hand" track is Michael's. He said that Michael was very proud of it. Can't waite to here it!!!..:-)


    **********************************************

    Bonnie said, "Given a choice between having MICHAEL BACK or his LEGACY which do you think his children would choose?"

    Clearly, Sony's already made their choice. Money over morality. They've pillaged his "treasury" and thrown scraps back to his beneficiaries. They've taken ownership of his intellectual property and it's criminal, although I fully understand that no court will find Sony guilty of any crime.

    I compare it on some level to the situation currently with ITV and MacKenzie's agregrious outburst. At the present, ITV feels they've done nothing to apologies for. They feel their codes haven't been violated. They only way to communicate to them that what they did was a moral vioation is for people to keep writing, calling, e-mailing in order to force an apology. I think this will eventually happen because public pressure has been building and lawsuits threatened. Sony is a harder nut to crack than ITV, but steady, continuous public pressure can't be ignored and could work. One can hope.

    Just a thought. As for affecting MJ3's financial situation, my understanding is that their inheretance is fully funded. That's the term I keep seeing. Am I to understand that will continue to be true even if all sales of MJ music/merchandise stopped today??

    ReplyDelete
  39. Lady, glad to see you back. Continued prayers for your dad!...:-)

    ReplyDelete
  40. This should be of interest to EVERYONE!!! If you don't have a Twitter, you may just want to get one for this...

    Join Randy Jackson on Twitter: Wednesday 10 pm ET/7 pm PT!

    There have been a lot of rumors and stories so I will be here Wednesday to set the record straight and give insight on whats really going on-This Wednesday at 7:00pm Pacific t...ime I will be at my computer ready to answer any questions you may have-As well as questions all of you may have, including the Oprah show-obviously there has been a lot of questions concerning the vocals on the new album that I want to address.

    http://www.twitter.com/randyjackson8

    ReplyDelete
  41. Hats off to ya Bonnie. In my eyes you are proving why YOU were CHOSEN for this mission. Deep roots and raw guts...splashed with humor.

    You had me LingOL with "What a bunch of foot-stomping cry babies."...you are so right!

    On the dog fight analogy...touché! A powerful finale.

    On the whole idea that what we are seeing play out now was set in motion before June 25th...

    "Seven? (knock-knock) . . . Is that you?"

    I have to wonder...

    ReplyDelete
  42. Bonnie- "I don't know what it is you have against the Jackson family, but you seem to forget the original challenge to the executors. Right now they have to play ball. Please back off of them because I will not go round with you on this, I will only refuse to publish attacks on the Jackson's."

    First, I don't have anything against the Jackson family outside of it seeming that they are perfectly willing to set themselves up as a potluck smorgasbord to the media, or manage to create a controversy. That is NOT attacking them. It's simply their history, and I am sad to say that. Yes, it's obvious that there are leaks in their camp (multiple ones at that), and it is the job of those leaks to stir up trouble. But, in all fairness... leaks have been a problem since the dawn of their Motown years. It has never changed, and at times instead of this problem improving-- it seems to have become worse. Does it mean I'm against the family? NO. I want that made perfectly clear, and I hope that it is. I do admit to disagreeing with them at times, however. But overall, it simply means that I question, and I proceed with caution, because it's obvious that not everything regarding them is able to be trusted. Even more so... I'm simply doing what Michael said to in so many words or less: "DON'T TRUST THE MEDIA!!!" On another level, I remember the 3 bodyguards statement about Michael asking if his family (when they came to see him) had an appointment. If they didn't, he wouldn't see them. There IS a reason, or several reasons as to why Michael would do such a thing. I mean no offense, but you DO need to be mindful of that and ask WHY he would do that to his own family. WHY???

    "Bandier did not work for Sony when Sony began pulling their crap with Michael, so no, it wasn't always Bandier."

    You're correct, in the early Sony days, it was Walter Yetnikoff, who basically got ousted by Tommy Mattola. My point with Bandier is that he was NEVER far from the ATV in some way, shape, or form. Take heed to his BMI days, before they too became part of the Sony family. Do you not think that Bandier didn't have connections within Sony? It's obvious that he did. Even back then. Otherwise WHY was Sony interested in the purchase of CBS/Columbia Records (which was the parent company to Epic-- Michael's label)? Hmm... gives reason to think here, doesn't it? The bottom line being: Own CBS/Columbia... own Michael Jackson!!! That was the birthing process of the entire plan, Bonnie. I bet on that one, and it's common sense when you get down to it.

    "I have no idea why you think Sony "choking" on money would deter them from doing this to anyone else. You'll have to explain that to me because I am of the opinion that you DON'T reward the bad guys."

    It's NOT my intention to deter them. It's my intention to bury them alive in their own BS. Think Judas and his 30 pieces of silver, and what happened after that. Maybe now, you can understand my point. This matter is entirely up to God because at least here on Earth, we are extremely inept. We have a corrupt Justice system. Sony and company have already WON!!! Michael is dead. Michael's family are at war with themselves. Michael's fans are divided. Murray has yet to stand trial, and AEG is taking all of the blame.

    In any case, you may disagree with me on this, and I with you at times as well, but that's all a part of being what we are. Human. :)

    ReplyDelete
  43. Jenn ~
    "I now feel I want to know WHO SEVEN BOWIE really is.. It is a great Pseudo, using Michael's favorite number and her favorite rocker's names combined. BUT, the question is; WHO IS THE REAL SEVEN BOWIE??? WHAT IS HER AGENDA? Am I the only one who thinks it has changed? WHO IS SHE REALLY??? Obviously, she feels the need to hide behind an Alias.. She too, has successfully seduced Michael's Fans and gained credibility as a FAN and one who CARES.. Does she really, or is this just a job she is being paid to do???"

    You know what? I was just thinking the same thing.

    The pace is quickening.

    Are these people converging from the four corners or have they come full circle from strategically placed positions?

    ReplyDelete
  44. @ Jenn: I am in agreement with your commentary above about the "big 4 factors" within the fan base: Taaj, Justice4MJ, Muzik (NEVER take your eyes off of her even when she seems to have disappeared or had been laying low-- she's ALWAYS up to something), and Seven, but in all fairness what do ALL of these groups have in common??? TINI. However which is perhaps the most sane of all? I'm going to say Seven. Taaj, Justice4MJ, and Muzik tend to enjoy drawing controversy and chaos to themselves. If there's one thing I've noted in the past year is that Seven tends to steer clear of that. So, I give her credit for such.

    Do I agree with any or all of these "justice sites"? Not always. So there Bonnie... don't think that I only disagree with you. LOL and hugz. I DO believe that the Justice4MJ team for the most part means well (Minus the graffiti of Forest Lawn and Neverland-- something that I felt was totally stupid and childish but that's them. Not me.), but they need to control the "drama queens" within a bit better by not "feeding" Taaj. Taaj feeds on drama. That's for certain. Lack of attention will kill her, and the more that the fan base leaves sites and whatnotall where they see her name, the better and the wiser IMO.

    Another thing that STILL continues to amaze me is all of the online butt-kissing and worship of increasingly ignorant Karen Faye!!! OMG...

    ReplyDelete
  45. From Taj Jackson as of yesterday:

    "Hold My Hand
    Yesterday, November 14, 2010, 7:45:00 PM | Taj Jackson

    "HOLD MY HAND" was the last song my uncle Michael every played to me in person. He was SO PROUD OF IT. I'll never forget that smile he had on his face as the song played through the speakers (in his room) at the Palms Hotel in Vegas. After the song was over, he asked me what I honestly thought of it. I told him it was a worldwide number one song and that it was going to be a huge. He was so happy to hear that.

    I did give the song one slight criticism though. I told my uncle that he needed to be singing more in the chorus and at the end of the song... lol. I said that we (the fans) would want to hear his voice more. :-)

    "Hold my Hand" will be officially released tomorrow, November 15th. I'm definitely excited to buy it as soon as it becomes available knowing that the moment I play it, I will instantly remember the day my uncle first played it to me. It's these memories of him that I hold on to and cherish with all my heart. Words can't express how much I love and miss my uncle Michael."

    Source:
    http://www.tajjackson.com/dee-dees-kid-blog/2010/11/14/hold-my-hand.html

    ReplyDelete
  46. JUne said - "This will sound informal as I have to leave for work. Bonnie, respectfully, you should read Michael's contract with AEG, as you say it was leaked on line, there's a copy with RADAR ONLINE all over it, and then there's the copy in Rowe's book, maybe those are the only two copies available to the public, who knows."

    June I HAVE a copy of the AEG contract with Michael and I also have read it more than once. I have NOT GONE OVER IT on this blog. That was something I wanted to do back in September when all you know what broke lose. I have read the contract. I don't know how to tell you what I see without revealing things I shouldn't yet. Do you understand? I have to wait.

    You said - "Perhaps sites use predated disclaimers all the time and we just don't know it."

    <<<<When copying a disclaimer the date on it should be dated when they either receive or put the page up on the site. I've worked as a licensed real estate agent and an insurance agent. We had tons of copies of "template" contracts. But they are dated when they are signed or put in force, not the date the contract template was printed out . . . does that make sense? It is possible they copied the date on the template disclaimer, but I doubt it.

    "Hold My Hand". I love the song but I have it on my computer already. I'm not buying the album because Michael wanted free from Sony. I'm not financing his imprisonment and torture.
    -----------------------------------------------

    Karin said - "The guy's going nowhere fast which is probably one reason why he is revisiting Michael yet again. I see him as an unwelcome intruder."

    You're right about Charles. His "career" began and will end with Michael. Much like Bashir, Halperin and Terrible-Ellie.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Anapassion said - "Here is the link where Will.i.am speaks about
    Michael "He'd call me up for father's day because he knew I didn't have a dad - he was something else
    Will.i.am"
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8123506.stm"

    >>>Yes! Thank you Ana! (((Hugs Wil!)))♥
    ----------------------------------------------

    Back to Karin - It wasn't just the disclaimer date. It was TINI'S affiliation with Sony, their incredible organization so soon after Michael's death. The articles in the paper, when you are writing in depth about Michael's death on the day that he died, and implicating AEG there was information in these articles that had not happened yet and it was dated the 25th of June sometimes the hour he died. You don't get articles and information that fast. You have to have time to write it. I will have to do a blog update on those as well (You people are BACKING ME UP ALREADY and I just got home! LOL).
    ----------------------------------------------

    Jenn said - "I now feel I want to know WHO SEVEN BOWIE really is.. It is a great Pseudo, using Michael's favorite number and her favorite rocker's names combined. BUT, the question is; WHO IS THE REAL SEVEN BOWIE??? "

    >>>>That is a good question. Here's my answer. I don't know, but sooner or later it will be revealed. Some of these people like another comment said, are being played by the Sony people, just like you. Seven strikes me as someone who would be a bit too savvy to NOT see what is going on. Especially over the Thomson and DeGosson issues. Seven knew.

    ReplyDelete
  48. SandyK said - "I'm looking forward to that update Bonnie!!! Also, don't forget to share your dream about Jesus, remember?...:-) "

    Okay . . . that's three blogs so far... (groan)♥
    ----------------------------------------------

    Sandy K said - "Yes. I think that is where I repectfully don't understand your point. They had been following him around, and in an intrusuve way of course, for a number of months, 8 to be exact, but that was the point I was making. This group was already of the mind set weeks prior to his death that something was wrong. "

    >>>>This group SAID and SOLD US a sickly Michael. Others NOT seeking publicity have given us quite a different story. I will pool these articles I was sent by this person and post them and you will then see what I mean. I will go over them.

    It's kind of like. . . how did TMZ know that Michael was dead four minutes before it was officially announced? Same with the articles. There is info in them on AEG that had not gotten out yet. It makes no sense.

    You said - "As for the letters, they were written before June 25, of course. These adult women, who seem to have no jobs or families, became alarmed because their access to him was being curtailed. "

    >>>>You are giving them a lot of license in light of what has been revealed about this group already. I can't do that knowing everything else they have lied about.
    ---------------------------------------------

    ReplyDelete
  49. SandyK said - "Back to Erin...when I faulted her for being ignorant, the Sony issue is exactly what I'm referencing. It's as if she's totally tuned out anything Michael said about them. Where has she been? "

    Where has she been? Ummmm . . . camped out in front of Michael's gate with the other stalkers? I'm sure they had to rotate out to get showers and whatnot (kidding, no I'm not). I am keeping everything in mind with this group. Taaj attacked Taj Jackson over credit for Jennifer Marino who is also with this Justice4MJ group, now Taaj M. is calling into the radio show as an anonymous caller? Give me a break! Are they that bereft of followers now that they have to stage their own radio show complete with fellow group members calling in? I was literally laughing out loud in my chair when I heard Taaj M. call in and Lisa and Amy. Taaj was the only one who wasn't named because people KNOW this history! Why don't they get Taaj to voice-over Sony's next MJ album? They are dumb enough to believe that fans would buy it anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  50. SandyK said - "BTW, Taj Jackson says that the new "Hold Your Hand" track is Michael's. He said that Michael was very proud of it. Can't waite to here it!!!..:-)"

    I hope they didn't change the way it was. "Hold MY Hand" is the name of the song, but I'm still not going to buy the album. You haven't heard this song Sandy?

    ReplyDelete
  51. SandyK said - "Clearly, Sony's already made their choice. Money over morality. They've pillaged his "treasury" and thrown scraps back to his beneficiaries. They've taken ownership of his intellectual property and it's criminal, although I fully understand that no court will find Sony guilty of any crime. " and "Am I to understand that will continue to be true even if all sales of MJ music/merchandise stopped today?? "

    Hmmm . . . on the issue of a court finding Sony guilty of a crime . . . we don't know that for sure. I have a feeling their arrogance is going to do them in. On your question about the "funding" of their inheritance, what does "it is fully funded" mean? To me that means that there is a set amount they are going to get and that is it. And I have to tell you that throws all kinds of warning bells off in my head.
    ---------------------------------------------

    ReplyDelete
  52. SandyK posted -""Hold my Hand" will be officially released tomorrow, November 15th. I'm definitely excited to buy it as soon as it becomes available knowing that the moment I play it, I will instantly remember the day my uncle first played it to me. It's these memories of him that I hold on to and cherish with all my heart. Words can't express how much I love and miss my uncle Michael.""


    Okay here is the problem I have with this. First of all, I agree with Taaj on EVERYTHING about the song. I love the song, the harmonies are immaculate and send chills up my spine and when I sing with them I can't help but fill in another part in harmony. You become one with the song, you can't help it.

    BUT >>> Why would Taj Jackson have to buy a song to hear his uncle sing? And why would he make a point of telling people he can't wait to buy it?

    Does anyone else find this odd?

    ReplyDelete
  53. @Lady who said - "So there Bonnie . . ."

    Pthththt! (rasberry to you! LOL) I can't wait to hear what Randy says. I'm praying any information he has to give will not tick me off and that I will handle this with DISCERNMENT.

    Also one other thing concerning Michael and his family. Michael trusted his family over Sony ten times over. So do I.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Bonnie said, "I hope they didn't change the way it was. "Hold MY Hand" is the name of the song, but I'm still not going to buy the album. You haven't heard this song Sandy?"

    To be honest, I feel like I have heard it before but I'm not sure where. Probably on You Tube at some time. I don't remember how it sounded then unfortunately. The version released today sounds very good...:-) I know it will be on YouTube, so I'll listen to it there. That's how I've listen to Michael's other music that I don't already have like "Invincible."

    ReplyDelete
  55. @SandyK - Well I would sing it to you but I cannot find my camera/microphone for this computer. Still packed somewhere. Anyhow it wouldn't be the same without Michael and Akon singing background vocals, LOL!!!

    Vevo! I have it on my computer from when it was on You tube. I sing to it on almost a daily basis. Goosebumps.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Bonnie said, "BUT >>> Why would Taj Jackson have to buy a song to hear his uncle sing? And why would he make a point of telling people he can't wait to buy it?

    Does anyone else find this odd?"

    Yes, I did notice this. To be honest, I don't know what he thinks about the issue with Sony other than what his statement is implying. It sounds like he's trying to encourage others to buy it by saying he's buying it. I would be curious to know what he feels about Sony and their relationship to his uncle though. He can't NOT know that history. Maybe he feels torn. Of course I'm just guessing. He is family and was close with his uncle so I want to give him the benefit of the doubt.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Bonnie, you replied to me "I have read the contract. I don't know how to tell you what I see without revealing things I shouldn't yet...I have to wait." Okay then, but anxious to hear what you think about that "contract"; still, IMO, Michael wouldn't have signed it, although there are a couple of signatures that look like his, along with a bunch that are supposed to be his but look nothing like his signature.

    If I may go back to the "disclaimer date" of May 26, 2009 on that template, I know that templates are supposed to be changed by the user to fit their own situation, I work with them every day, but in this case, the disclaimer date wasn't changed, IMO, the persons attempting to use the template either neglected to do so, or the template was incapable of being changed.

    You can find it at www.ourdisclaimer.com. To me, it sure looks like TINI's disclaimer; however I agree that date isn't dispositive one way or another, of anything, again IMO.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Bonnie said, "@SandyK - Well I would sing it to you but I cannot find my camera/microphone for this computer. Still packed somewhere. Anyhow it wouldn't be the same without Michael and Akon singing background vocals, LOL!!!"

    Toooooooo funny....:-)

    Michael, if only you were here so you and Akon could be Bonnie's back-up vocalists....:-)

    Oh crap, I just lost it...:-(

    ReplyDelete
  59. Video: "One More Chance"

    I've heard this song before but didn't see the video part before. This is only a partial.

    Michael, Michael...♥.♥.♥

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqGrd5uEekA

    ReplyDelete
  60. About Hold My Hand...

    I'm reading that it is the first official single. But I thought they said that about Breaking News?
    And, Hold My Hand with Akon & MJ has been out there for several years on YouTube. Has it been released previously?

    Do I sound confused? Yup!

    ReplyDelete
  61. Bonnie, yes, I do find that odd that Taj Jackson would say he can't wait to buy Hold My Hand; however I'll wait to hear if there are other opinions on this. Don't want to give what might be an odd comment too much room to roam!

    I think on the issue of the childrens' inheritance being fully funded, it's meant that whatever amounts were designated are already there, not to be touched, no matter what happens. Growth of those amounts depends on a lot of things .....

    ReplyDelete
  62. Bonnie, as soon as you mentioned the video by Will i. Am, I remembered how I felt when I first watched it last year. It was extremely emotional to see him so upset that he cried, especially when he talked about the Fathers Day call. Oh, God...only Michael would have thought to do something so beautiful! Here's the link to that video, which was hard to find, as his name appears backwards in the title (iamwill). I'm still crying!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkzk6ZR04DU&feature=related

    ReplyDelete
  63. I have a question about Michael's music in his vault.

    Let's say Michael was still alive and lived to be 70 years old.

    Let's say Michael then died of natural causes.

    How could Michael's children benefit from his music after all those years?

    That would be 20 years from now! Who would buy these songs after so long?

    Or were these songs suppose to be for Michael's children to listen to ONLY, and Not for sale?

    ReplyDelete
  64. Just for reference sake on the issue of . . . Is it SONY? or is it BANDIER?

    http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/06/michael-novel-mottola-malnik-and.html posted in June,

    http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/08/help-michael-not-parasites-at-sony.html Posted in August of 2010,

    http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/08/sony-what-more-can-we-take.html Posted in August of 2010,

    "2007 – Martin Bandier leaves EMI and takes over as CEO of the Sony/ATV business. Sony/ATV purchases “Famous Music” catalog with 125,000 songs, making Sony/ATV the third largest music publisher in the world.)" http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/08/follow-sonyatv-and-money-will-come.html Posted in August of 2010,

    http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/08/say-no-to-sony-blood-money.html In August of 2010,

    In July of 2010 http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/07/michael-is-still-not-with-us.html

    Another in August of 2010 - http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/08/attempts-to-discredit-and-distract.html

    July 25, 2010 http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/07/pealing-back-layers-of-conspiracy.html

    July 27, 2010 http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/07/was-this-michael-jacksons-2006-raymone.html Lady quotes me directly on this one in one of her posts.

    July 19, 2010 http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/07/michael-and-j-randy-taraborrelli-best.html

    August 17, 2010 http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/08/michael-jackson-know-about-transitional.html

    August 13, 2010 - http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/08/sony-and-sneddon-connection.html

    None of this information is new. Bandier is a bad guy, I know this . . . Koppleman, Green, Branca, Mottola, Stringer, McClain, Weitzman, Yetnikoff.

    What did Michael say? I don't give a rat's behind what Joe Jackson is quoted as saying in some interview by someone who posted on Twitter . . . WHAT DID MICHAEL SAY?

    How many times do I have to post that damned video of his speech?

    These people are STILL INVOLVED WITH SONY and now ENTANGLED WITH THE ESTATE.

    I don't care if it was one person working for Sony or the whole company. If you buy from them, you are financing everything they did to Michael.

    Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  65. @Lady, I am glad you’re back. Thank God your dad is fine.

    @Princessglam said - "...unfinished or demo tracks of Michael's voice fleshed out by other people in the way they 'think Michael would have done it' is NOT a Michael Jackson album….. If someone took a half-finished Picasso and let several other artists loose on it to 'finish' and sell it as a Picasso? There would be uproar!! “Well said. You know that will not happen for Picasso’s work and it should be the same for Michael’s work too.

    @ Bonnie said, Seven…… as outspoken as she is, she said NOTHING to curtail Erin Jacob's deception to the fans about Sony's role in Michael's life. I look at it this way, after backing the Samantha lies and backing Charles even with his past, I have to question those who back liars and what their real agenda is.” I agree.

    I believe in my heart if Seven and as the matter of fact any one of them are really stanch defender of Michael, one of the most important thing they should have done is questioned and investigate ALL controversial fans of their motives to bring clarity before defending them blindly. If they share the same motives, that’s another question.

    @SandyK said, “Another and very different reason that I stick with this blog is that you haven't attacked Michael's family. Too many do that too easily. Internal family dynamics can be very difficult to interpret from the outside looking in. Too much can be misinterpreted and often has with the Jackson family. Thank you for giving them that space.”

    That is so true SandyK. No perfect family exists in this world. None of us appreciate if someone who knows only fragmented stories about our family talk bad about our family. If that happen to us, believe me we will be furious. So we shouldn’t be saying hurtful remarks to any family as a matter of fact.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Speaking of TINI and DeGosson, I am puzzled by the inconsistencies and time line of events as she tells it. Here is the interview Samantha gave on February 8, 2010 outside the courthouse.

    If Michael was in such dire straits several weeks before he died, where was the sense of urgency from this TINI group to try and save him? I said this once before, that they spent a lot of time designing the website, but not much time trying to intervene on Michael's behalf! Which came first - launching a website (anticipating Michael's death) or...trying to save his life?

    In this interview, Samantha says they tried an intervention on June 24th. She goes on to say that Michael "brought them into Center Staging on May 29th" and told them he was unhappy, couldn't sleep or eat, had agreed only to 10 shows, but woke up to 50, said he was stressed out and only one person...etc., etc.

    Does anyone find it odd that Michael would voluntarily bring these followers in to express his anxiety over the concerts, knowing it would be leaked to the media? The story did get out, and shortly after is when Samantha claims security limited their access to Michael.

    Samantha claims TINI planned an earlier intervention in May, but - and this bugs me big time, they had not gathered all the fans' letters to give to Michael! For the sake of not gathering a few more letters, they held off almost a full month until June 24th? For a man they claim was in no shape to perform, where was the urgency? Two screwed up interventions. I see a lot of motion with very little "action," but lots of personal publicity for DeGosson and the TINI group. Mission accomplished?

    Samantha says the letters were placed in Michael's hands at 5pm on June 24, saying they had a statement for him. In Michael's HANDS. She then said security told them they couldn't stop at that time, saying "we'll do it later...do it ON THE PHONE." That was unclear. Do WHAT on the phone?

    I'm not holding any fan responsible for trying to prevent a tragedy that was behind their control. But DeGosson, the followers and the TINI movement want to claim public credit for having tried to save Michael, yet their flimsy attempts failed TWICE! But they launched a costly website, gave interviews, and are busy planning documentaries, take time out for Vegas jaunts, photo ops with Joe Jackson and Majestik. Such busy bees. Now that Michael is gone, they have all the time in the world to take care of the "real" business at hand. Self promotion!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5zCEYQ3jsg

    ReplyDelete
  67. June said - "Okay then, but anxious to hear what you think about that "contract"; "

    June, what I think about that contract is tainted. I can't post about it. Honest answer, it was a Godsend. I know you don't understand that right now and that is the BEST I can do right now.

    On the disclaimer, it was ONE of the issues that stood out when I was researching them, not the ONLY one. So we can probably leave it at that. Even without the disclaimer date, the disclaimer and the other issues with that site stand on their own.
    -----------------------------------------------

    SandyK said - "Michael, if only you were here so you and Akon could be Bonnie's back-up vocalists....:-)

    Oh crap, I just lost it...:-( " <<<<<<<< Hey! I'm not that bad! LOL! You made me smile though. Thank you. It relaxes the face after the tears. Got hit with a bad one tonight and that other link you posted . . . "One More Chance" really did me in. Haven't cried that hard in months. Glad my husband isn't in here to see this.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Truthbtold said - "And, Hold My Hand with Akon & MJ has been out there for several years on YouTube. Has it been released previously?

    Do I sound confused? Yup! "

    >>>> That is a good question. I don't know the answer. Sony makes me sick. I am sick to my stomach right now over One More Chance. Sick. Sony is going to dig Michael right out of his grave and make him dance in string to finish previously unfinished work. It's FAKE SONY!!! Fake!!! How do you finish a video and tell people it's Michael with half the video reshot with someone else? PATHETIC!!!

    ReplyDelete
  69. June said - "Bonnie, yes, I do find that odd that Taj Jackson would say he can't wait to buy Hold My Hand; however I'll wait to hear if there are other opinions on this. Don't want to give what might be an odd comment too much room to roam!"

    I was told by someone I took this up with that Taj's account could have been hacked and that it's happened before.

    I don't know if that is true, it is just what I was told. There was another reason they gave and that was that there is a reason for everything (which honestly does not help me, LOL). I was also just ordered "no more computer tonight, get some sleep" so I am off to bed and I'm sorry . . . will answer everyone tomorrow. This has been a very hard day. ♥♥♥

    ReplyDelete
  70. Funny, but I have gotten some messges in my In Box on FB from several people passing along the 'real' name for Seven Bowie.. Kind of surprising that a few give the same name and information.. I am holding onto this information right now and doing some looking into it on my own. I may not be computer savvy,, but I am SMART!!! So, let me see where this goes..

    Yes, I have worked today on a packet to send to the Hayvenhurst Home..via Randy Jackson with ALL the information I could get from Bonnie and Muzik's Blogs that Taaj has posted, tweeted, sent on the FB news feed and photos of her with Randy, Joe and she and the 'group'.. Samantha&CO.. I hope Randy and Taaj take the time out to see who this person is.. She needs to be swept away and removed from breathing the name Michael Jackson..We'll see, as they are very busy people with families, Seeing that the MJ3 are surrounded with LOVE..

    ReplyDelete
  71. Lady, so pleased to hear your Dad is doing much better than thought - such a relief.

    Bonnie, I'm fascinated by that date on the TINI site. All possibilities have been running through my head. Please, when you can, I'd love to hear your thoughts on it. Do you think it could have been set up for a separate purpose in the beginning to undermine the concerts and then the agenda changed after Michael died?

    We all know that Sony would have been content for Michael to remain in dire financial straits so they could come in for the kill. What other reasons could a so called fan base be behind such a site? Just one thing I would like to clarify Bonnie about both catalogues. My understanding of normal collateral loans is that the first lender retains first right of foreclosure and or sale of the assets and then if there are further loan agreements, the second/third fall into line for their share if there is any left.

    Bonnie, do you think that would have been the case with Michael's catalogues? If that was the case then how could AEG have gotten a chance unless they hoped to buy out the original loan through an offer. Just trying to get my head around that AEG contract.

    ReplyDelete
  72. @ SandyK ~
    Video: "One More Chance"

    "This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Web Sheriff."

    That was quick! Coincidence?

    ReplyDelete
  73. Josie said, "That would be 20 years from now! Who would buy these songs after so long?"

    If such a scenerio did happen, Michael's music would still have value (released or unreleased) and people will still want to buy it. He is timeless in the same way that Frank Sinatra, The Beatles, Jimi Hendrix, Bob Marley, Elvis, Judy Garland are. And lets not forget much older artists such as Mozart, Bach, Beethoven, Vivaldi, etc. The styles of music of these individuals/groups may be very different and more or less dated, but great music will always stand the test of time and sell, no matter what. The Beatles still sell even though their last record was released 40 years ago. If a new release of never before heard Beatles songs was to be issued today, people would DEFINITELY buy it. Michael's back catalog, including Jackson 5 material, especially with in the first several months after his death, most definitely sells. In Michael's case, the stratospheric sales of last year of come back to earth, but will never stop. He'll still be in demand 20, 30, 40 years from now and beyond. Without a doubt. Anyway, just wanted to share that...:-)

    ReplyDelete
  74. SandyK - That was quick but it doesn't matter. It's been seen and Sony is hiding.

    I will be moderating comments today but I cannot answer them as I will be a bit busy today. I will get to these tonight. Thank you for your patience.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Bonnie ... here's a little video for YOU. Thank you for being "one of the crazy ones" .... HOLDING YOUR HAND on the way to the truth.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EI8RTbJLTbY&NR=1

    ReplyDelete
  76. @SandyK - what is Web Sheriff? I tried to get that vid as well and got the same response; removed by Web Sheriff? Half the vids I try to pull up are removed by some entity or another, names I recognize, but I haven't seen this Web Sheriff prior to last night. Do you know who or what this is? Thanks Sandy.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Josie, your comment about "what if" Michael had lived to 70, and SandyK's reply about his music living forever; this thought string hit a chord with me, as I have "what iff'd" many times to the effect "what if" none of the charges had ever happened, and Michael was still living at NL with his children, and how many more children could have been helped by his kindnesses and generosity, and the types of citizens his own children would have grown to be, caring and compassionate as Michael was, always helping others, living under that wonderful protective roof known as Neverland. Neverland would still be thriving, and prospering with the love and kindness Michael wanted to spread all around the world, and yet he would have had his haven from those would would harm him, as I believe even without the "charges" Michael was just too big for the music industry to accept. I sometimes still see him sitting in his tree writing music, while his grandchildren played beneath. Such a loss, on so many still unknown levels.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Bonnie another good job!!

    I will say this again as I said it before, it will all come out in the wash. All this is part of the business plan and fulfilling some personal agendas. All one has to do is follow the money and the BS masquerading as truth and facts.

    I still haven't forgotten about Peter Lopez!!

    ReplyDelete
  79. Karen - I deleted your post about Wiesner. I will explain why shortly. don't be offended. I don't blame you. I don't think you knew.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Wow! The "One More Chance" video was pulled pretty quick!! Well, here's a different link to that song that came on line today. It calls itself the full length version although the video quality isn't that great and there's a water mark across the center of the image for the entire length of the video. Rats!

    One More Chance

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n_mMSb2au8&feature=player_embedded

    ReplyDelete
  81. I have a question. Please anybody answer this for me. Why is that some fans so loyal to Michael Jackson’s bloggers or justice groups or any Michael Jackson fan groups such as TINI despite their divisive activities than to Michael himself?

    What I mean is the moment any fans that blogs or group leaders are exposed of their misleading & divisive activities, those who follow them align themselves with them without doing any researching and fact checking and show their loyalty to the groups or bloggers they follow instead of showing their loyalty to Michael.

    It seems to me followers follow those groups or bloggers believing them instead of questioning their motives that there might be some truth in the exposing of their deceptions. What I found out is FOLLOWERS stick with their group despite the truth laid out in front of their face and attack whoever did the exposing of the deceptive activities and show their loyalty to which they follow than to Michael. I found this to be really odd. Are they fans to those whom they follow or to Michael? I don’t get it.

    I think the role is changing. Michael is the main cause to form the groups and bloggers but followers are fans and have allegiance to the bloggers and to groups. If they are fans and have allegiance to Michael, they will be watch dogs to any deceptions are done in his name instead of following blindly.

    I am asking this question after observing how followers behave since Bonnie started exposing deceptive activities of groups. I hope you get my point.

    ReplyDelete
  82. June said, "I sometimes still see him sitting in his tree writing music, while his grandchildren played beneath. Such a loss, on so many still unknown levels."

    I LOVE the image you painted. What if indeed...:-( So many what if's...:-(

    Forgive me while I have a sentimental moment. I grew up with Michael, in a matter of speaking, like we ALL have so I claim NO special privileges...:-) He's always been a part of my life in some way. However, I never saw him in concert. I never met him and was never likely to. But I'm drawn to him in a way I've never been drawn to someone I never met. He was so unique and was not just another celebrity. He did so many good things, and was so persecuted to a degree that bordered on sadistic (Sneddon and Sony come to mind) that he stands in a category by himself. I hate isolating him like that because to me he often seemed very conflicted with the idea of fame with it's obvious positives and very clear negatives, especially for him. He lived in both ends of that spectrum and would occasionally crave "ordinary" activities like a rare after hours visit to a grocery store, of all things. He could have all the "friends" in the world and still be the loneliest man in the world. He craved the company of kids because they didn't treat him like a "God." He was just Mike. Of course he retained so much in his own personality that was "kid-like." This quality served him well in his ability to create and discover new possibilities and see the wonderment in simple things. Although he had collaborators, I can't imagine him ever having writers block...:-) Even during the development of This Is It, his mind was constantly racing with new ideas, and it was said he joked that he had to express all these ideas or God would give them to Prince (the singer that is)...:-)

    At the end of the day, I would never have sought him out and never felt like I had to meet him, but now that he's gone, I want so much to meet him and have "One More Chance," as it were, to tell him "I get it, I understand, I won't judge you. You're wonderful just the way you are." Ultimately his kids taught me that and certainly he got that kind of message from them already. Which is much more meaningful than from a total stranger like me...:-) That's something I can be glad for.

    God bless you Michael. I know you're at peace now.

    ReplyDelete
  83. I just finished a blog update and SandyK - you and I both. I was in so much . . . I don't know what to call it. I broke. I clicked a link to that "One More Chance" video and I KNOW that video was never completed. So Sony just finishes it off and says,

    "here guys . . .you don't need the real Michael, we can fix it so that we can always splice and dice Michael in audio or on video and you will never know we did him in . . . now enjoy . . . that will be $17.95 . . ."

    Thank God I have friends that can talk me down because I was not in good shape last night. Sandy you sound like you are having a weak moment like that, so I would like to offer you my arms and my heart . . . a prayer.

    I posted a new blog and unfortunately as I dig into this, this is far from over. But fans are going to have to take a stand . . . they are either going to have to stand with Michael or stand with Sony, and that is what it is going to come down to.

    ReplyDelete
  84. Mimi said - "Why is that some fans so loyal to Michael Jackson’s bloggers or justice groups or any Michael Jackson fan groups such as TINI despite their divisive activities than to Michael himself?"

    Because they believe that these people had a relationship with Michael in some way, shape or form. It's this illusion of Michael that they have spun but their purpose is really to help Sony sell Michael. Not even his music on much of that album. This whole project with this Sony group/bloggers/stalkers is to drive up sales. Sabataging Michael's family and anyone that REALLY loves Michael is just a bonus.

    ReplyDelete
  85. Sandyk-your "experience" with Michael so parallels my own, never knew him, never saw him perform live, never read Moonwalk, but was always AWARE that he was in our world. He was so multifaceted with songs of love, peace and hope, and his other very interesting SO entertaining side, and all he went through, for sure I followed it, the trial was out there in every conceivable form. Since he passed, I've been picturing other scenarios for Michael, as I have described in an earlier comment, what his life would be like absent media attention, absent false salacious charges, just a man with three children, going about his inspirational life.

    Yesterday, Barbra Streisand (a favorite of mine) was on a show whose name I shall not mention. She too I've followed afar all her public life. But she had (and demanded) a private life. Michael had none. He was too giving of himself to everyone, along the way the media and the vultures took over and Michael never recovered. God has him now. We have the memory and legacy of him. So I think I've created my parallel Michael world as now there are two (for me), Michael as we all knew him before June 25, 2009, and the Michael that would have been. Better to envision what might have been than to accept the pieces of Michael that his destroyers are tossing at us now.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Bonnie said, "Thank God I have friends that can talk me down because I was not in good shape last night. Sandy you sound like you are having a weak moment like that, so I would like to offer you my arms and my heart . . . a prayer."

    Thank you Bonnie. Thank you for understanding. And thank you for the prayer. It's very much appreciated. I'll always have a soft spot for Michael and those weak moments will probably continue to happen periodically, as I'm sure they will for you too. You're in my prayers as well. God bless.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.