Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Branca Koppelman Behind Michael's NOI Bodyguards

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Branca Koppelman Behind Michael's NOI Bodyguards


December 27, 2010 – Michael’s A-Team - “A” for “Anti-Michael”
Same Greedy Bunch

Michael Jackson: "Blood On the Dance Floor" Part 1 and Part 2, and "At Your Name" reveal why they wanted Michael and why they cannot find him.  "At The Mouth Of The Dragon"

Yes, back to these people.  I know, I know, you are sick of seeing  their faces, but  there is more to this legion of vipers and there is one more rumor I would like to clear up while we are at it.

As the state of California was about to embark on the building of a case against Michael Jackson back in the latter part of 2003 and early 2004, Branca, Koppelman, Malnik and others were gathering to hit Michael while he was vulnerable.

They were trying to get him to agree to relinquish his rights to half of the ATV catalog.  In return they wanted  to give him a fraction of what it was worth, give him a cash lump sum that would have still left Michael over $100 million in debt with no way to pay it off.  We covered that on These blog updates (in order, if you need to refresh):


The meeting pictured above . . . the very one that “Justice4none” (some, meaning NOT MICHAEL)  has proudly displayed on his site as “Michael’s trusted advisors” is of a meeting which took place on January 12, 2004.  These are among the people that are there:

Charles A. Koppelman, John Branca, Mark Geragos, Trudy Green, Karen Langford, Alan Malnik, Alan Whitman, Zia Modabber and Leonard Muhammad . . . yes, the son-in-law to Louis Farrakhan.

Remember this rumor?

Dr. Tohme’s ties with the Nation of Islam – sources below:

MTV News, Gil Kaufman – Where Tohme denies he any affiliation with NOI

This of course made it’s rounds to the blogosphere and the MJ fan forums and message boards.  Tohme had no affiliation with NOI.  This was Farrakhan’s son in law.  Guess who else was involved?  The lovely John Branca, Charles Koppelman and Modabber.

Picture of Leonard Muhammad in middle – Far end of Table in photo above


More proof . . . let’s check out the enemy’s own mouthpieces:

Leonard Muhammad – Posted January 13, 2004, source ,


Michael wanted to fire these people as soon as  they were installed in 2003 shortly after the accusations became public, as per this posted article on “freeminds.org”, which quoted an article published in the New York Post on December 31, 2003, two weeks before the meeting above.  Source

Reading down on the same page is also quotes from the Associated Press.  Nation of Islam bodyguards was never Tohme’s problem, it was Louis Farrakhan’s son in law. http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&hl=en&q=leonard+muhammad+michael+jackson&aq=1v&aqi=g1g-v4&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=83f87efc6f926f13

Michael never hired him . . . THEY DID.

Who are the rest of these jokers?

Alan Whitman – Michael’s accountant. Works for Allan I. Whitman of Fox, Bernstein, Whitman, Goldman and Sloan

Karen Langford (lawyer) works with Branca.  (she appears on TII Credits)

Kevin McLin – One time spokesperson (self appointed?) for the Jackson family (yes, in on it)

Zia Modabber – Previous attorney for Michael, appears on “Michael” CD in “Thank  you” along with John Branca, McClain, and several others that attended this meeting.

According to Billboard, Modabber is the one who told Michael that Marc Schaffel was a porn producer, prompting Michael’s firing of him.  Ironically it was Schaffel that was the “employee” that came across paperwork that alerted Michael to the conspiracy back in 2003, while working with Michael to produced that benefit concert for the 9-11 victims. Source

Who's "zooming" who, here?
This quote from the source above – "My focus was on doing what I could to get the rights to release the single," Modabber said of the song, which was being held up because Schaffel claimed rights to it. "I got involved with trying to clean up that mess."

This is a lie.  Sony is the one that REFUSED TO RELEASE THE SINGLE stating Schaffel’s previous job as an excuse.  Schaffel is the one that spoke out against what Sony did and was in fact still working for Michael when Sony refused to release it.  I covered that here: Source, and Mark Schaffel’s interview here.  Source

This is what they have done to each and every person that got between THEM and MICHAEL!

So They Could Accomplish This



Quoted from the Associated Press –

“The Nation of Islam, in response to several inquiries, has said today that it has no official business or professional relationship with Mr. Michael Jackson," said a statement issued by The Final Call, the group's newspaper. "The Nation of Islam joins thousands of other people in wishing him well."  Source

No business or professional relationship?  Then what is Muhammad doing at the January 12, 2004 meeting with other NOI people and all of the accountants and lawyers, including the then fired Branca?  Did Michael know Branca was at this meeting?  Did Michael even know of the meeting?  Because according to this article, He wanted NOI gone a month prior! Source

Same source as above – “As the Nation of Islam inserted itself, many of Jackson's regular advisers were unable to gain access to the singer, the sources said.”

No, they didn’t insert themselves.  They were “inserted” in, to keep Michael’s trusted away.  This is beyond sick.  Five years later, Tohme gets the blame for Nation of Islam, as if these news reports from the NY Times and the AP did not exist?

Michael finally fired everyone in 2006. Branca was supposed to be gone in 2003.  Branca was still working . . . behind Michael's back, not WITH Michael!  This was after Michael is fined for not paying the insurance on his ranch, and having to come up with back pay for employees of the ranch before having to send them home.  The 2005 trial and it’s preliminary investigations were the catalyst and some cleaning house finally took place. 

Whitman testified in one of Michael’s court cases that he paid himself $100,000 a month. What for, I have no idea.  I didn’t know you had to pay someone to sabotage you.

The deceptions continue today.  These people are still working together.  “Justice4Some” is a hired hand . . . so is Thomson, so is the newly enthusiastic “Michael” CD Promoter, Aphrodite Jones.

I have started making a list of all these people and their connections.   They won’t be hard to spot. They have a “Michael CD” in one hand, and their other hand out for your money.

And the Estate?  They let it go on because those people are doing their job.

Guess what folks?  Tohme is not the bad guy.  Another rumor bites the dust.

“This Time Around”

(rap: the notorious big)
Listen, Ive got problems of my own
Flashin cameras, taps on my phone
Even in my home I aint safe as I should be
Things always missin
Maybe it could be my friends
They aint friends if they robbin me
Stoppin me from makin a profit, see”



2 Thessalonians 2:10
and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

You’re fearing me, ‘cause you know I’m a beast
Watching you when you sleep, when you’re in bed
I’m underneath
You’re trapped in halls, and my face is the walls
I’m the floor when you fall, and when you scream it’s ‘cause of me
I’m the living dead, the dark thoughts in your head
I heard just what you said
That’s why you’ve got to be threatened by me

79 comments:

  1. Bonnie,
    The fact that Thome is NOT the bad guy, doesn't surprise me.

    Just like Frank DiLeo, you never hear or see Thome around anymore. It's like they BOTH dropped off the face of the Earth!

    And BOTH of them are the Good Guys!

    Frank and Thome have "MOVED ON" with their lives and are NOT interested in making MONEY off Michael's name!

    Yes! They are INDEED the Good Guys, Bonnie!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bonnie,
    What really gets me, is most people think when someone has tons of money, they have Power. But as we can see, in Michael's case, that was not so!

    Even though Michael had tons of money, these Rotten, No Good Vultures were the ones who were "In Control!"

    Michael didn't stand a chance because he was Out Numbered!

    Money Isn't Everything

    and often times

    Money Doesn't Bring Power!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Okay, please excuse me for swearing but I'm so angry. What a bunch of thieving c..ks....ers!!

    How generous of them to arrange to take the catalogue off Michael's hands and still leaving him holding a massive debt. Thank God Michael had the presence of mind to say no and placed his faith in his creator. You know Bonnie, sometimes I am amazed that Michael managed to keep his faith after all the betrayals he experienced during his lifetime. It really is a miracle.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bonnie, Michael was a fighter and it feels great in the song "Threatened. " He was bad for all those people around him including Branca. This ugly people, money is important but for Michael it was all music and love. In fact, Michael will remain 'forever in the history of music and his enemies will only hurt forever'cause do not have souls like Michael.
    Ciao Daniela

    ReplyDelete
  5. @Liberian Girl hee-hee - I am severely disappointed that you believe Michael is in bed with Sony after all this. You'll have to forgive me for not posting the youtube links, this blog will not promote that song nor will it promote that album.

    If you can name the "close contacts" within Sony that would EVER keep Michael there despite everything they have done to him, please be my guest and I will research them.

    Just the mere fact that Michael's enemies practically handed over all Michael's business to Sony with Bandier still there, and Mottola still there, and Koppelman still drooling in the wings should tell anyone with any common sense that no . . . Michael is NOT behind this stinking album. I appreciate your side-door efforts to try to promote the album here with the front door compliment, but I'm not buying.

    Why don't you people start your own blog? Aren't the 15 or so you have now to try to save Sony's butt working?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bonnie,
    LOL at your comment above about the 15 Sony bloggers not working!
    Back to what I was going to say - a couple of weeks ago Raffles Van Exel commented to Victor Hsu on Facebook:

    Raffles van Exel - Dude Dr. Tohme might hit to Hong Kong this week. If so I make sure you guys meet. Let's close this deal
    09 December at 07:25.

    What do you think that was about? Maybe Raffles is interviewing Tohme?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Whoa! Sorry Bonnie. I did not mean to offend you in any way. If you read my post, which you did not post, I said I don't know for sure about the current status of Michael and Sony's relationship. I do not know who his close contacts are at Sony, I just said that the "informer" (roll your eyes, I know), on SmoothC21's channel has said that. Actually, if you go to his/her channel you will also see "SONY sucks!!!" written next to their channel name. These videos do not promote the album. See for yourself.

    I am not trying to promote the album and I am not you people. I came to your blog with sincere interest in what you and the others here are saying. I have been researching the events surrounding his "death", and have been a believer that Michael may be alive from almost day one. To read your post that you have come to believe that he is alive too, gave me more reason to keep the faith. But, thoughout this, I also must keep an open mind.

    I do find it interesting that the lyrics of the three controversal songs are very powerful with respect to Michael's life. Again, I am sorry if I offended you and will refrain from discussing this again on this blog. I don't know anything about the 15 or so blogs that are trying to save Sony's butt. I am not in Sony's corner and you have researched and written much to the contrary. I know what they tried to do and thankfully Michael outsmarted them, when it came to his catalog.

    Piece by piece Michael will be revealed, and I am just trying to put together all the pieces.


    Peace.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Josie said - "Money Isn't Everything

    and often times

    Money Doesn't Bring Power! "

    >>> I don't believe Michael was looking for power when he bough that catalog. The fact that Branca told Michael about it, arranged for him to buy it, then spent the next 20 years trying to defraud him of it leads me and many others to believe that this was about INFLUENCE as much as it was power/wealth.

    I believe they always intended to get the catalog for themselves and several of these goons may have even been battling each other over it, but on the surface, they first had to try and get it from Michael. The best they could do was the Sony merger.

    I would love to know just how deeply Michael looked into this industry and what powers were involved in it because this is all stuff I am learning as I go.
    ---------------------------------------------

    @Karin - Awwwwwww! I'm telling mom! (stop that!) Yes, Michael not only managed to keep his faith but his composure as well (most of the time). Every time I hear the song "Don't Walk Away" I think of all the fans that have vacated justice for Michael in favor of a Sony-produced album. This tells me that his music was more important to them than HE was.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Daniela said - "This ugly people, money is important but for Michael it was all music and love. In fact, Michael will remain 'forever in the history of music and his enemies will only hurt forever'cause do not have souls like Michael."

    >>> This is true Daniela . . . but he did try. The love of money was stronger.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Branca & the "dream" team behind Michael's NOI bodyguards ? I am stupefied !

    So as you said Michael got rid of them in 2006. But then from 2007, Bill Whitfield, Mike Garcia, Javon Beard were the 3 guards appointed to protect Michael & MJ3: I'm not sure if their TV interview of March 2010 totally in defense of Michael BTW was made partly for greed or not but to me the 3 look OK : they were faithful as they never let down Michael & MJ3 during the 2007-2009 precarious financial period although once they weren't paid 4 months salary.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EL_QC-eYZw

    &

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cO-ezc_P6OI&feature=related

    What is significant in Part 2 is what Mr. Whitfield said :

    - Dr. Conrad Murray is an escape ghoat as his
    fact is not the one of one person only,
    - Where were all the reunited stars (all
    present at the 6.25.09 Memorial) during the
    2005 trial?

    The journalist also said at the end of Part 2 that the 4 months unpaid salary to the 3 security guards was not even Michael's fault but the one of "mismanagement" : who was it ?

    As I read later, these 3 gentlemen were NOT in L.A. on 06.25.2009. So my questions :

    - Where were they ?
    - Still working or not anylonger for Michael ? -- Or fired by "third parties" ?
    - Apart from Al Alvarez who made the 911 call
    on 06.25.09, which security was in charge ?
    - Was again the NOI in charge ?
    - If not, who appointed who as "guards" to
    Michael so that NO call from his father or
    else was ever passed on to him so he
    couldn't be rescued ?

    Independently, if Dr Thome is no bad guy, OK. But why did Michael in a recorded call stated to June Gatlin (I don't care what SHE said but focused only what HE said - he left us messages!) that Dr. Thome controlled totally his finances, his contacts with his lawyers & business partners, also Michael did not trust him, etc.. Dr. Thome practically controlled his life, even for less than a year, but still.

    If during the TII rehearsals time, Michael had had in Holmby Hills or in Encino his mother or his father's presence, or e.g. Dirk Gregory or any normal human being watching over him or eventually bodyguards like Mr. Whitfield & his team (who showed some kind of humanity to him & his children), I believe Michael might still be with the MJ3 today. But that wasn't meant to be for big evil forces were making sure Michael remained only low-profile i.e. under THEIR CONTROL because a Michael re-emerging victoriously again financially & artistically, also morally in the public's eye, had by no means ever to happen to destroy "THEIR" plans.

    Such a bad configuration of "harmful stars" like in Michael's tragic destiny, one doesn't see this each day.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Liberian girl said - "I just said that the "informer" (roll your eyes, I know), on SmoothC21's channel has said that. Actually, if you go to his/her channel you will also see "SONY sucks!!!"

    >>> I see Sony Sucks on TINI'S website too. Yet they defend any notion of boycotting this album, instead opting for the "you'll hurt Michael's children" argument. I'm sorry, but I don't want their links on here. That song you referenced and the other "two" which are Jason Malachi's voice are Jason Malachi's voice. If not, then Michael would have been credited on the CD as lead vocals in those songs and he was not. The mixing on the songs is horrible, they even had to mess with the Akon song.

    I have posted in a previous blog that the lyrics were Michael's however, the person applying for the copyrights was not. Other than stating your opinion that you believed the vocals were Michael's, I didn't see the point of your post. That coupled with the links promoting the songs is the reason I did not post it.

    Talking about Michael's music does not offend me. But this was NOT Michael's music. Half finished demos over processed by Sony with a Michael impersonator is what they were. What Sony cherry-picked were songs about the environment and songs they could interpret as being against the press.

    You said - "I am not in Sony's corner and you have researched and written much to the contrary. I know what they tried to do and thankfully Michael outsmarted them, when it came to his catalog."

    >>> I get trigger happy when it comes to Sony and that album. Hope you can forgive me. I do have enough on this blog to realize the the people giving Michael the problems are indeed still with Sony and yes, the estate willfully and willingly chose to deal with them. That alone should be enough of a red flag risen above any other argument anyone else tries to twist you into believing.

    This is Sony's album, Not Michael's. These are Branca's deals with Sony, not Michael's.

    If you have any doubts, ask yourself why Michael would leave half finished songs with various other artists for Sony to scarf up.

    He's not a dumb as they seem to think.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Bonnie said - "I get trigger happy when it comes to Sony and that album. Hope you can forgive me." Yes I do, and I hope you forgive me for making you get your guns out. :-)

    Bonnie said - "This is Sony's album, Not Michael's. These are Branca's deals with Sony, not Michael's." Yes, I am aware of that and that is the reason why Michael did not have any say in what songs and who sang on the album. Aside from the fact that he is supposed to be "dead." But, remember, Teddy Riley produced those three controversial songs and he's also tweeting that Michael is still alive, so what's up with that?

    ♥ L.O.V.E. ♥

    ReplyDelete
  13. Bonnie, well I said a couple days back that I wouldn't be back; however, it's all too interesting and you still have the best research even though we disagree on some issues. Above you say in reply to Liberiangirl "I get trigger happy when it comes to Sony and that album. Hope you can forgive me" Yes, you do, and sometimes you get trigger happy when folks disagree with you. However, you surely do keep it interesting!

    I have a conciliatory nature, if I'm a wus then so be it. Comes with age and being beat down a few hundred times. I posted on that "other" blog when the issue of the "autopsy" first came up, and actually emailed to and got a response from Weitzman, that he was "outraged"; ha! Of course he and Branca, et al., did nothing about the "autopsy". And of course we know why. I didn't expect anything different, but at least they can't say they weren't aware. Their lack of credibility if staggering when the only infringer they attack is Howard Mann. And the owner of that blog didn't chastise me for expressing myself. I viewed that as a plus in the greater plan of seeking justice for Michael.

    I still think there is room for varying opinions on different issues. Others have doubt about Tohme, AEG, Colony, but don't think for one minute that I don't know Sony is at the helm of ALL this; Sony just got by with a little help from its friends, in my opinion, as Tom Mesereau would say.

    This upcoming month is going to be TOUGH, there will be awful court leaks from the usual sources; I still believe the truth will come out.

    Keep the faith for Michael.

    ReplyDelete
  14. @Liberian Girl - No prob. I just wanted to let you know. I TRY to let people know up front and I've repeated it before . . . This blog is for Michael, to defend Michael and support Michael. It's for Michael, period and what was done to him. I don't want to entertain debates about Sony or this album or Sony's lack of interest in Michael BEFORE Michael "died", and that is why I get trigger happy. No Jackson family bashing, no links supporting an album ANY ALBUM that Sony puts out. Unless Michael comes out and says "Hey . . . We got rid of the bad guys and put good guys in at Sony, it's okay", Sony is and will be beneath contempt. That includes those making the decisions that ARE STILL THERE!

    (ducks sheepishly), I just wanted you to know that. :o)
    -------------------------------------------

    @ June - on the "Trigger Happy" issue, see above my response to Liberian Girl. This blog is for Michael. Your announcement was over a disagreement concerning Wagener.

    Now for Branca?

    See link: http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/1229_mj_discovery_letter_TMZ.pdf


    The Discovery Channel. They could have this program shut down in a heart beat. I am betting that they will. I may be wrong, but how much to you want to bet that this whole "autopsy" show issue becomes a "Hero" vehicle for the estate executors? After all, their image is severely suffering amongst fans.

    How much do you want to bet that this "documentary" somehow, goes away?

    ReplyDelete
  15. @June - Had to shorten the one above, sorry:

    You said - "Their lack of credibility if staggering when the only infringer they attack is Howard Mann. And the owner of that blog didn't chastise me for expressing myself. I viewed that as a plus in the greater plan of seeking justice for Michael."


    >>> That's a good point. What about all the other "merchandizing" going on in Michael's name? Ron Sweet? Erin Jacobs? Catherine Gross? Sunflower Guy?

    I realize you can't stop someone from wanting to send flowers, but NONE OF THIS is regulated. And this is just the SURFACE stuff! These people are just the brine on top of babbling brook.

    I feel like I want to take a shower, the things I am finding out. I can't even keep up.

    ReplyDelete
  16. LineCH, to my knowledge Bill Whitfield and the other two bodyguards stoped working for Michael once he got involved with the AEG concerts. They were not at the Holmby Hills home. They have a facebook page where you can ask them questions and quite often they answer. Here is the link if you don't already have it: http://www.facebook.com/#!/MJBodyguard?sk=info

    I don't know what has happened with the progress of their book. They claimed some months back that they were having difficulties getting a publisher for it.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Bonnie – thank you so much for doing a fantastic job, and shining the light of truth on those thieves who inserted the Nation of Islam in Michael’s life.

    The article from New York Daily News that was posted on popdirt.com confirmed by saying, “Leonard Muhammad of the Nation of Islam sat at the head of the table at a meeting with members of Michael Jackson’s inner circle on Monday…. Jackson’s music manager, Charles Koppelman, said they were discussing the Gloved One’s bottom line.”

    So this shows that this guy and other members of the Nation of Islam were involved in Michael’s affair way before Thome was even in the picture.

    What is Leonard Muhammad profession besides being a member of NOI to be involved in the decision making of Michael’s affair with all those lawyers, music manager and so on?

    Was this a technique used to have a smear campaigns against Michael and to inform the public that Michael was involved with Nation of Islam who has bad reputation in the country?

    ReplyDelete
  18. @Bonnie, I just read Branca’s letter to Discovery Channel on the link you posted. I agree on what you said that the estate executers may “shut down” the airing of the program; and if they did, it will “becomes a “Hero” vehicle for the estate executors.” This will open the door for PRO BRANCA blogger to exploit the situation and rally as many fans he/she can get in support of Branca for doing “great jobs” for Michael.

    What I don’t understand is a few days ago the executers said they have no standing ground to stop the airing of the program and nothing they can do. So what happened now to write the letter? I bet you they are playing games on the emotions of fans to finally get their full support.

    Only fools and shortsighted people will believe their game. I hope and wish many fans can “outsmart” them just like Michael did to Sony.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Bonnie, thanks for the link with Branca's letter, dated just today after weeks of fan letters and petitions. Something must have happened to make him finally contact Discovery. If the "autopsy" is shut down, we all know the "hero" won't be Branca or Weitzman, it will be Michael's supporters who banded together in sufficient strength. THAT'S THE TRUTH. Two weeks ago Weitzman said he wasn't even aware of the problem! They must have been bombarded with emails! And Branca/Weitzman's image HAS eroded among fans; when the "autopsy" mess started, they were both blissfully unaware while they were lifting champagne glasses at the premiere in NYC of the album, nice timing, huh?

    As for Wagener, as I have said, I don't know what grounds he could use to indict Sneddon as the statute of limitations is long gone, so I will remain cautious and curious, but also interested in anything that brings Sneddon down. Michael didn't write DS just because he liked the words or the subject matter!

    ReplyDelete
  20. LineCH said - "But then from 2007, Bill Whitfield, Mike Garcia, Javon Beard were the 3 guards appointed to protect Michael & MJ3: I'm not sure if their TV interview of March 2010 totally in defense of Michael BTW was made partly for greed or not but to me the 3 look OK : they were faithful as they never let down Michael & MJ3 during the 2007-2009 precarious financial period although once they weren't paid 4 months salary."

    I don't know enough about these particular body guards, but there have been many people that have thus far come forward defending Michael and did so as long as a buck or two was involved in doing so. Are these gentleman of that same ilk? I don't know. They seem like nice guys. That's all I can tell you, I have not dug into their story. I am not buying their book. I love stories about Michael, but Michael tells them best and I have no question he is telling the truth about HIMSELF.

    These gentleman - The three body guards were not still working for Michael and not every ex-body guard Michael ever had was invited to the memorial. NOI was fired by Tohme, what was left still working for Michael. The remainder of them were fired, I believe, in 2008 when Tohme took over.

    I hope that answered your question. Body guards may be on the up and up. They didn't have to be at the memorial for that to be true BUT . . . they are writing a book. Everyone is writing a book or doing a documentary. I am cautious.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Mimi said - "This will open the door for PRO BRANCA blogger to exploit the situation and rally as many fans he/she can get in support of Branca for doing “great jobs” for Michael.

    What I don’t understand is a few days ago the executers said they have no standing ground to stop the airing of the program and nothing they can do. So what happened now to write the letter?"

    >>> I wonder! Response to criticism? You are a smart woman, Mimi! I'm watching Justice4none. I think you are spot on in that observation!
    ------------------------------------------

    June Said - "As for Wagener, as I have said, I don't know what grounds he could use to indict Sneddon as the statute of limitations is long gone, so I will remain cautious and curious, but also interested in anything that brings Sneddon down. "

    >>> I am still on this and I'm sorry to say, you are probably going to be disappointed.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Mimi said - "The article from New York Daily News that was posted on popdirt.com confirmed by saying, “Leonard Muhammad of the Nation of Islam sat at the head of the table at a meeting with members of Michael Jackson’s inner circle on Monday…. Jackson’s music manager, Charles Koppelman, said they were discussing the Gloved One’s bottom line.” "

    >>> True. Yet Geragos contradicted this, and Modabber saddled both extremes on this answer. They were involved, they were hired/sought out by this group and it was yet another group of people they "installed" around Michael. How Michael managed, God . . . I get so blinking angry talking about this!!!! I have had it with their lies, I really have. They left plenty of bread crumbs for us to follow and they're too arrogant to care.

    ReplyDelete
  23. @June said, And Branca/Weitzman's image HAS eroded among fans; when the "autopsy" mess started...” I agree with you; however, as long as we give our support to PRO BRANCA BLOGGER with posting our comments on that blog, whether we like it or not we are supporting Branca fully.

    If we want to erode their image further, we need to hit them in every direction and stop supporting everyone who supports them.

    The Pro Branca Blogger is trying to convince us, thinking of us we are stupid anyway, Branca is doing “a marvelous job” for Michael and MJ3. We need to dig deep of the history of Branca/Weitzman and the entire “vipers” as Bonnie said and what they did to Michael so we can defend our beloved Michael from the bottom of our heart and bring justice to him.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Bonnie,
    You know what really ticks me off, is that these Vultures were making ALL the Decisions for Michael!

    Didn't Michael have ANYTHING to say about it?

    They did so much behind Michael's back and got away with it for so long, it just blows my mind!

    Here Michael has all this money and yet "These Vultures" are Controlling EVERYTHING!

    GOD in Heaven I pray You EXPOSE EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM and let YOUR Justice be Served in Our Lifetime!

    AMEN!!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Bonnie,
    I understand your anger. I'm getting very angry myself. The more I learn about these Vultures the more I want to Scream!

    This is so SICK!

    These Vultures are Sicker than SICK!!!

    I don't know if there is a word in the English Language to describe HOW SICK these people are!!

    Just keep up the Great Work you are doing here Bonnie, and thank you for letting me vent.

    ReplyDelete
  26. @mimi, you said "as long as we give our support to pro branca blogger with posting comments on that blog, ... we are supporting Branca fully.

    With due respect, I do not agree. IMO, information can be obtained from many sources. There are others who comment on THIS blog, who also comment on that "other" blog, and other blogs besides these two! As you say "we need to dig deep into the history of Branca/Weitzman ... so we can defend ...Michael" Part of digging deep is obtaining information from many sources to make informed decisions. Aside from that "other" blog and this one, I read and sometimes post on two additional blogs which have still other opinions on these issues. Same as reading four different newspapers, or four different magazines. Reading several, and posting comments when able to do so broadens knowledge not confined to one writer's opinion.

    If this Discovery "autopsy" gets cancelled, it will be the power of united fans that is the cause, not one overdue letter from Branca, just as supporter emails and the like were the catalyst to finally get some action from him.

    ReplyDelete
  27. LineCH said - "ndependently, if Dr Thome is no bad guy, OK. But why did Michael in a recorded call stated to June Gatlin (I don't care what SHE said but focused only what HE said - he left us messages!) that Dr. Thome controlled totally his finances, his contacts with his lawyers & business partners, also Michael did not trust him, etc.. Dr. Thome practically controlled his life, even for less than a year, but still."

    >>> I forgot to address this (this happens sometimes on the longer posts with lots of discussion points),

    I do not believe the phone call to June Gatling was authentic. If it was, then Michael is a bad actor. Michael did NOT sound afraid or even bothered in that tape. I have discussed this before, he almost sounded amused.

    June Gatling does not have one blinking picture of her and Michael together. Not one. How was she Michael's advisor and how come none of us heard of her until after his death? How did he find her? 1-900-Scam-you?

    There is a break in that tape where the narrator and June talk over Michael. And with everything else that the Sony people have spliced, layered, faked and photoshopped, this phone call? I don't believe it. I want to hear the UNEDITED VERSION without the MOUTHPIECES talking over Michael.

    Michael sings about his phones being tapped. If he was being tapped, he was being recorded. And if they can fake Michael's voice in a studio, on an album, and paste pictures of homeless gangstalkers next to Michael to sell their story, It is not such a stretch to question the authenticity of this taped (TAPPED) phone conversation to edit as they please.

    ReplyDelete
  28. @June - I think Mimi is referring to posts like this:

    "Justice, I want to thank you for these breakdowns re the estate and the execs. The court info includes basically only names of persons and what they filed, unless a fee is paid to see the actual documents, so you really do a service to the fans by posting this information. "

    This person is close to the estate to be able to get the information they are posting. Keep in mind who just did his speaking for the estate during a televised interview. He did not PAY for these reports, they were given to him. With the information I have found, they knowingly have and they are still defending the estate. Ask Justice to explain Branca, Malnik and Muhammed and the NOI people at the Jan 12, 2004 meeting.

    Mimi's problem if I am not mistaken, has to do with support of someone twisting the facts that are right there in past news items and PICTURES THEY THEMSELVES USED to twist those facts.

    This person has an agenda. There have been many who have come and gone from this blog, to collect information and to try to post propaganda and start a war to tear up this blog.

    Anyone can see who has made the bulk of the money from Michael's estate since June of 09. It has not been AEG. It's been Sony and Branca/McClian and now Weitzman.

    Ask Justice why Courtney Love suddenly dropped a lawsuit against these same people for embezzlement when she twittered and Myspaced about fake bank accounts and house flipping in hers, Kurt's and her daughter's names?

    This is what Mimi has a problem with and quite frankly so do I. Lady Aquarius made an appearance, disappeared, then also reappeared.

    It is not a difficult pattern to figure out. I am entitled to my distrust.

    There is no proof that Branca every worked for Michael after Feb of 2003. Just because he was in cahoots with those that Sony installed into Michael's life like a pathetic little leech does not mean Branca worked for Michael.

    The picture at the top of this blog I ORIGINALLY got from Justice's blog. He calls it "Michael's trusted advisors". Okay . . . where was Michael? You see NOI lieutenant Leo Muhammad, you see Modabber, you see Koppelman who was NEVER Michael's friend, you see Malnik and you see Branca and Geragos and Whitman. Now if Justice wants to sell us the idea that Branca was 'working' for Michael and trying to get Malnik out of Michael's business, he has a really hard time doing that in this January 12, 2004 picture, doesn't he?

    I see NO VIABLE DEFENSE for that sham of a deal they tried to strong-arm Michael into in an effort to get him to turn over his catalog, still leaving him in debt.

    I have MUCH on Branca. I have not posted all and it will not GET posted until it is safe to do so.

    But I understand Mimi's apprehension because I have the very same.

    ReplyDelete
  29. To make light of the whole Sony album situation and way off topic I have to tell you about what a well meaning friend gave me as a Christmas present. You guessed it - for all of my "I will never spend one cent on Sony and I am more than happy with the music Michael gave us when he was alive" - yep I got the new album as a gift. I didn't have the heart to tell this person my feelings as they genuinely believed that being such a Michael admirer that I would be thrilled. You wouldn't believe it. Here am I happily boycotting and yet I end up contributing to Sony vicariously.

    ReplyDelete
  30. @Karin - (Gasp!) Oh no . . . what's her phone number! We HAVE to talk! I'm gonna have to pray about this one! (big grins).

    It's not her fault. She doesn't know. All she knows is that you love Michael and she got you that CD. I don't even know how I would handle that.

    My grandmother gave me a Ouja board for Christmas for my 12th birthday. She had no idea what it was, she thought it was a board game. I was afraid to touch the box. We ended up burning it in the fireplace after she left (You'd have to know what my mother was into when she was a very young adult to understand why we did this). I never said a word to her about it, just thanked her for the gift.

    No, I am not telling you to burn the CD. If you are looking for ideas to feel better about it, maybe call her over to listen to it one day with you, and then casually ask her, "Does Breaking News Sound Like Michael?" How did they get this after he died?" Or . . . say nothing at all. Someone else I know got the CD as a gift too (not me) and she didn't know what to do with it either, LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  31. @ BONNIE "Everyone is writing a book or doing a documentary. I am cautious."

    You are right, so I am. Just that the 3 guards seem to have been very far from the worst that surrounded Michael so many years.

    BONNIE "I do not believe the phone call to June Gatling was authentic."

    It seemed at first to me that Michael's voice was his but everything is possible after all (I'm no expert) so I accept your assumption on this issue. The only true "factors" for now at the origin of Michael's demise : the big "S" with their horde of lawyers, bankers, financial advisors, judges,(nicely called "greedy bunch") plus their low-class paid conspirators (Chandler, Arvizo & of course...most media). AEG & related pals ? I still have my doubts on those but they came late in the picture. Sony accomplices or not, it only remains an assumption. Except for the important "S" factors above (will they ever be charged?), the rest around the 06.25.2009 still only leaves many open questions.

    Many thanks for your patience in replying to me on your previous 2 posts.

    KARIN : "LineCH, to my knowledge Bill Whitfield and the other two bodyguards stopped working for Michael once he got involved with the AEG concerts"

    Many thanks, Karin. Till now, I never "face- booked". I just wonder : did the 3 guards had another work contract, or were dismissed & by who ? true, their book is not published yet : why ? Don't bother of course to reply as I may try myself on Facebook. If these 3 guards were not around in L.A. on 6.25.2009 they are not the most notorious witnesses, but who knows ? they heard & seen a lot around Michael in 2 years. Anyhow, I wrote my first post yesterday for I was so angry (alike you regarding the big "S") thinking then that no compassionate & decent human being was around Michael in 2009 to prevent the tragedy: to me he was controlled by shadowy figures. Now, should it be part instead of a contrary plan aiming to save his life thus obliging him to disappear from the public eye, I am still skeptical but ...still open. Let's see what the future brings.

    JUNE : "If this Discovery "autopsy" gets cancelled, it will be the power of united fans that is the cause, not one overdue letter from Branca".

    Right ! on that particular issue, I do agree & have at least my conscience at peace that I posted my letter to Discovery London : my voice alone is of course worth nothing but millions of voices may make that Discovery & the Estate start at last scratching their heads on the full impact of angry fans in motion to defend Michael.

    ReplyDelete
  32. LineCH said - "You are right, so I am. Just that the 3 guards seem to have been very far from the worst that surrounded Michael so many years."

    >>> Just for the record, I don't believe that everyone writing a book is bad. I'm just cautious about their motives and the timing (that was almost three years ago, they wait to announce this book after Michael is gone. Estate not stopping them, etc) which is why I withhold opinion on them because Sony is not the only one with "installed" people.

    on Gatling - If she wants to try to convince people that Michael was "deathly afraid ... that's a good word ... deathly", she's going to have to come up with a more convincing taped phone call then that. And again, why would Michael agree to be taped? Did he know how this call was going to be used? Lots about this story does not add up, like the fact that the NOI body guards isolating Michael from family and friends was hired by that pack of vipers pictured at the top of this blog NOT Tohme . . . they're just the ones responsible FOR that rumor on Tohme. This confirms for me that Gatling is conveniently "installed" to perpetuate hate toward Tohme.
    ---------------------------------------------

    SandyK said - "I agree. I also post on other blogs. To be informed means one has to read other sources."

    >>> I also read what the other blogs are saying. Reading to stay informed and posting are two different things. Discovery, just like Sony, has a head office. Notice the picture making it's rounds on the internet the caption is in French.

    Here:http://dsc.discovery.com/ Not a single peep about this program.

    Here: http://investigation.discovery.com/ Not a single peep about this program. Not even a "coming shows".

    Now here: http://www.yourdiscovery.com/uk/?cc=US Not one mention of an autopsy show. I did a search on that site under Michael Jackson and here: http://search.discovery.com/search?proxystylesheet=DCUK&site=ukDiscovery&client=DCUK&region=uk&output=xml_no_dtd&getfields=*&filter=1&ie=utf8&oe=utf8&q=Michael+Jackson&searchbtn=go Shows a list of about four forum topics NEITHER ONE TALKING ABOUT AN AUTOPSY SHOW.

    Here: http://www.ketknbc.com/news/michael-jacksons-autopsy-to-be-aired-on-discovery-channel It is announced on KETK NBC news as a blurb, again picture in french. But no mention of it on the Discovery Channel sites.

    At this site: http://www.yourdiscovery.com/uk/?cc=US Scroll to the bottom and there is a list of countries that the Discovery Channel airs in. Guess what? France is not even listed.

    So just where is this supposed to Air and why would the Discovery Channel not even advertise their own show ESPECIALLY considering it is Michael Jackson!

    SandyK - applaud the estate executors if you wish. Just don't do it on Michael's blog. I am removing your post.

    ReplyDelete
  33. More?

    http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&hl=en&q=Discovery+Channel+U.K.+Michael+Jackson&aq=&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&pbx=1&fp=9bef8cda26d1a6ec

    I search under the terms "Discovery Channel U.K. Michael Jackson" Guess what comes up? Not ONE SINGLE DISCOVERY CHANNEL LINK. It's all the Examiner, KETK news, blogs, Michael Jackson Forums, LATimes blurbs. Not one single Discovery Channel link.

    Does this show even exist???

    ReplyDelete
  34. More:

    Searched for "Michael Jackson Autopsy" (without the quotes) and came up with ONE FORUM TOPIC:

    http://community.yourdiscovery.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/45010602/m/862108395

    I recognize some of the nicknames there, LOL!

    Still no mention of it on any Discovery Channel web site link. Just one forum thread with a whole 21 comments, all from 8 of the same people, three of which have nicknames I recognize.

    But no Discover Channel Web site mentions or acknowledgments of this show, which is reported by tabloids and MJ fan forums as going to be aired in the middle of January in the U.K. yet who's advertisement is in French.

    Does anyone want to venture to guess that Branca and team are to be "applauded" for shutting down a show that does not exist?

    ReplyDelete
  35. Ladies and Gents:

    http://johnny.depp.mediafetcher.com/news/top_stories/actor_austria.php

    Johnny Depp Fell to his death.

    Not mainstream news yet.

    I am reading Atlas Shrugged again.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Posted for Mimi who could not post this from work:

    @Bonnie said, “Mimi's problem if I am not mistaken, has to do with support of someone twisting the facts that are right there in past news items and PICTURES THEY THEMSELVES USED to twist those facts.” Bonnie, you are not mistaken and that is exactly my problem is. Thank you for explaining it better than I can do it.



    @June said, “Same as reading four different newspapers, or four different magazines. Reading several, and posting comments when able to do so broadens knowledge not confined to one writer's opinion.” I have no problem on what you said and I agree too. However, I DO NOT support any newspapers or magazines or radio talk shows or television programs that twisted the facts and lies continuously to brainwash the mass and keep them in dark.



    There is nothing truth can be found on lies and propaganda. That’s what the other “blog” does, brainwashing fans hiding the truth. I seek the truth where ever I can I find it where ever it is – I am “not confined to one writer’s opinion.” If I see someone twisting the truth and lies in the name of Michael, I run away as fast as I can, because I want my support for Michael to be CLEAN and PURE.



    Supporting Pro Branca Blogger IMO is not what Michael wants me to do, and it should be true also for everyone else who loves Michael because WE KNOW what Branca did to harm Michael working behind him(WITH SONY) to sabotage his assets and his life. In fact he sabotaged him big time while he was his lawyer by not telling him about the fine prints that prevented him to have a full ownership of his music catalog on the year he was eagerly expected it. That angers me a lot and make my blood boils every time I think about it, and everyone who LOVES Michael should feel the same way and let this thieve know about it how we feel.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Taaj Malik was "in court with a couple of friends". Really?

    Where is she getting her docs to post on Twitpic?

    http://twitpic.com/3l89nr/full

    ReplyDelete
  38. Bonnie, check out the bottom of that website on the Johnny Depp death story. Another fake death.

    "about this web site. this story was dynamically generated using a generic 'template' and is not factual. Any reference to specific individuals has been 100% fabricated by web site visitors who have created fake stories by entering a name into a blank 'non-specific' template for the purpose of entertainment. For sub-domain info and additional use restrictions: FakeAWish.com
    Copyright © 2009 FakeAWish.com All rights reserved."

    I guess just because we read it in a magazine, or see it on the tv screen, or the internet...particulary the internet, don't make it factual. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  39. BONNIE : "Does anyone want to venture to guess that Branca and team are to be "applauded" for shutting down a show that does not exist?"

    1st scenario : Do you assume that a manipulation was set up to restore publicly the estate's reputation ? then the world is SICKER than I even imagined & I don't understand the world anymore.

    2nd scenario : the show is real & aired as of 01.13.2011. The estate sent their claim letter lately (at last) & under the public pressure only. But as a Michael defender knowing the past Sony/ Branca history, I don't feel at all to praise the Estate. Let's never forget :

    - J. Branca played many years very bad games with Michael by favouring his client Sony's interests against Michael's, also his client. Strange "ethics".
    - Branca/McClain did not even drop in to pay their respects at the 2009 Memorial to their long-time valuable client Michael who still makes them richer each passing day.
    - Michael died/disappeared 12 small days before July 2010 when he could have finally recovered his music rights back from Sony when in 2002 already he should have been back into possession of them should the "good works" of J. Branca not have been on this Sony contract.
    - No single Sony delegate appeared at the 2009 Memorial but Sony continues to make a LOT of money on Michael's name.

    The above facts say it all. So those ignorant or cynical enough to "applaude" the Estate, it is their issue, not mine.

    My own approach on this Discovery program is pragmatic : the program has to be cancelled, no more no less. It is a small battle compared to the forthcoming 2011 hearings, but any small battle won for Michael is worth it. Only in this context I did send my own claim letter to Discovery. But if manipulation/fraud there is then it comes from the US on Michael & it would also mean that everything will continue to be manipulated on the Justice's side. I do hope it's not the case.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Happy New Year Bonnie,

    I just had to thank you for a couple of comments you made. The June Gatling/Michael Jackson tape. I agree with you. And, thanks a bunch for the research on that Discovery Channel Show. Having signed the petition, I have been vacillating between writing the letter and not writing the letter. You have helped me a great deal.

    The Branca/McClain Show is getting just a bit much, don't you think?(rhetorical)

    ENJOY THE REST OF THE YEAR, BONNIE. HOPE THE NEW YEAR BRINGS YOU AND YOURS A WEALTH OF LOVE AND HAPPINESS AND MOST OF ALL GREAT HEALTH.
    LOVE ALWAYS

    ReplyDelete
  41. @LineCH - You have laid that out very nicely. You said - "It is a small battle compared to the forthcoming 2011 hearings, but any small battle won for Michael is worth it. Only in this context I did send my own claim letter to Discovery. But if manipulation/fraud there is then it comes from the US on Michael & it would also mean that everything will continue to be manipulated on the Justice's side. I do hope it's not the case. "

    Agreed.
    --------------------------------------------

    Judith said - "I just had to thank you for a couple of comments you made. The June Gatling/Michael Jackson tape. I agree with you. And, thanks a bunch for the research on that Discovery Channel Show. Having signed the petition, I have been vacillating between writing the letter and not writing the letter. You have helped me a great deal."

    >>> You are welcome Judith. I will keep watching this Discovery Channel thing but I have found NOTHING on their site about this supposed show. Me thinks this is all tabloid-generated deception.

    Thank you very much and HAPPY NEW YEAR TO YOU AND YOUR FAMILY AS WELL. Please remember to keep praying for Michael and family.♥

    ReplyDelete
  42. Bonnie,
    I have a new post about a British documentary on Michael (NOT the autopsy!), which a source sent me today. It revealed some interesting information which I thought would interest you and your commenters, and may open some interesting debates.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Oh Bonnie, I got a good laugh when I saw you post my older comment on the "other" blog in reply to sometheing Mimi said here, wherein I thanked the "other" for the stats on the execs and their reports. I stand by that as I am interested in viewing the estate's filed reports (as imo supporters should be); however, the court system requires payment of a fee for this information. I am always interested in seeing the long list of opportunists filing claims in Michael's estate and the actions taken on such claims by the execs.

    I think it's a good thing for one blogger to read the blogs of others and the comments thereon, just as I believe in the rights of commenters to read and post on blogs of their choice. The blogger always has the final say about posting comments anyway. Exchanges of information are helpful; posting on a particular blog does not mean one agrees with the blogger's opinion on every issue.

    Bonnie, imo please rethink your comment about the "autopsy" being a "tabloid generated deception." Unfortunately, it's not and must be stopped.

    I've decided "Butterflies" from Invincible is my favorite Michael song; I've listened to it a dozen times today. Cheers me up when I think of what's to come over the next couple months.

    ReplyDelete
  44. @Liberian Girl - you said""about this web site. this story was dynamically generated using a generic 'template' and is not factual. Any reference to specific individuals has been 100% fabricated by web site visitors who have created fake stories by entering a name into a blank 'non-specific' template for the purpose of entertainment. For sub-domain info and additional use restrictions: FakeAWish.com
    Copyright © 2009 FakeAWish.com All rights reserved."

    >>> ROFLMBO!!!! Well, at least now we know how the amature journalists do it, hahahaha! Thank you for the laugh!

    ReplyDelete
  45. @PrincessGlam - I would be interested in seeing it if you want to submit it. I'm not looking for debate though, just discussion and un-burying the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Bonnie said, "SandyK - applaud the estate executors if you wish. Just don't do it on Michael's blog. I am removing your post."

    Bonnie, I didn't mean to offend you. The issue about the show doesn't mean I agree with everything the estate does. For instance, I don't agree with the huge deal that was done with Sony earlier in the year concidering Michael wanted nothing to do with them again. We've seen how poorly Sony handled the release of that album recently with the questionable vocals and the like. An album containing songs that Michael left for his children; songs that should not be sold off in order to line the pockets of Sony executives. I feel very strongly about that and those feelings won't change. Anyway, as for Discovery U.K. I was so sickened by the prospect of an autopsy show that seeing that letter gave me some hope of some redeaming human qualities in the executors. However, they are still corporate attorneys, and the corporate mindset is first and foremost to make money. Certainly the LOVE of money is the root of all evil and we know that Michael was also very keenly aware of this. I never forget his Sony talk.

    I was wondering, if this show was in fact fake, as I believe has been suggested, why hasn't Discovery not come out and said that there is no such program on their schedule? It's been advertised since early December and they've never made any statements disavowing it? I am very confused with this.

    If I may, I wanted to add this web site. It lists complaints about the program from individuals from around the world on the Discovery U.K. site:

    Source:
    http://community.yourdiscovery.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/45010602/m/862108395

    Peace to you Bonnie.

    ReplyDelete
  47. June said, "If the "autopsy" is shut down, we all know the "hero" won't be Branca or Weitzman, it will be Michael's supporters who banded together in sufficient strength. THAT'S THE TRUTH."

    At the end of the day it will be the fans. You're absolutely right! If it wasn't for the fans pushing so hard, we wouldn't have heard from the estate at all I believe.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Bonnie, if I may, I'd like to include this Discovery U.K. tv schedule that shows the date and time of the program in question. Looking forward to you thoughts on this.

    http://www.yourdiscovery.com/tv-schedule/?type=search&country_code=GB&channel_code=DCUK-ENG&time_slot=16&date=13012011&search_string=What

    ReplyDelete
  49. Dear Bonnie,
    Thank you once again for your through work and although it shakes every single bone in my body reading the horrifying reality of these disgusting specimens who call themselves human, knowledge is power. So the saying goes. If we close our eyes or turn our backs, Michael will never be free, or his children.

    God bless you, dearest Bonnie.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Bonnie,
    This Fake A Wish.com is one SICK Site!
    Yet, I am not surprised. Because we are dealing with some Very Sick People here.

    As to whether the story about the Autopsy Doc. is True or False, I wouldn't be surprised either way.

    If True, it's exploiting a human being and if False, it's the IDEA of exploiting a human being.

    Both reasons are SICK and that's why nothing surprises me anymore.

    As for setting Thome up, I agree with your reasoning, Bonnie.

    And Yes, on that June Gatling Tape, Michael (fake Michael) didn't sound the least bit scared for his life.

    I remember when I first heard that tape, (around July of 2009) I thought he sounded too calm and now I know why.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Jacques Peretti made a second documentary for British television about Michael Jackson, which was aired December 30 2010. For his first documentary about Michael, Jacques flew to America a few weeks after 25 June 2009 to interview people for “Michael Jackson’s Last Days: What Really Happened”, which was aired 12 July 2009.

    The latest documentary “Michael Jackson’s Secret Hollywood” included some interesting new information, and confirmation of what some of us had already suspected.

    That Michael was surrounded by advisors, doctors, lawyers and fixers that all wanted a piece of him.

    People fought to get into his entourage, and often wanted to BE the star at the center of the entourage. Brian Oxman was interviewed, and said that the theft from Michael by his own staff was astronomical, and that Michael told him ”I hire the people that steal from me the least”.

    It was clear that Michael knew EXACTLY what was going on around him, and periodically had a ‘spring clean’ of his staff, replacing managers and even bodyguards. Michael‘s managers over the years:

    1984-1989 Frank DiLeo

    1989-1997 Jim Morey/Sandy Galin

    1996–2003 Dieter Wiesner

    Wiesner was interviewed for the documentary, and said that Michael asked him to spring clean, to “To get rid of everybody” and also to come up with a plan for his future : MJ Universe (see my post for more details about this 2003 project). Wiesner says that because he was not part of the Hollywood scene, MJ Universe never took off, but we all know the real reason; the Bashir interview and the child molestation charges brought against Michael in 2003.

    Brian said that the reason for the trial, was NOT about child abuse, but because the prosecution had found out about Marc Shaffel’s gay pornography background. Marc was a videographer who had made a video for Michael for his single called “What More Can I Give”. They wanted to prove a connection between Schaffel’s shady past and Michael, and tar Michael with the same brush. To top it off, it was then revealed that Wiesner himself owned a string of sex clubs across Germany. This is what they wanted to use to take Michael down. Guilt by association.

    Jacques also looked into the ‘clean-up’ services provided by Hollywood when things went wrong for stars like Michael. He spoke to Private Eye Paul Berezi or ‘The Enforcer’, who realised that witnesses to the alleged 1993 child molestation charges against Michael, were embellishing their story, as the price for their story went up. Berezi spoke about another job he had undertaken for Eddie Murphy, and how he had got witnesses to recant their stories, and that the only witness not to do so had mysteriously fallen to her death. At this point, I started to realise that the idea that the deaths of Peter Lopez, Bruce Ayers and Sulema and Jerriell Wilborn, could be linked to the vampires and werewolves surrounding Michael Jackson, really wasn’t as farfetched as I had thought.

    ReplyDelete
  52. "You have laid that out very nicely..."

    ... I always mean as I write it, Bonnie. But your "bomb" theory that the Discovery program could just be a pure "fraud" gave me the chills & raised my doubts, I admit : but again, in addition to the evil program airing, I do hope it's no evil fraud.

    Your Blog going out of the comfort zone sometimes is quite an experience, but I do appreciate that you openly & at your own risk dig into any unexpected scheme in order to possibly find the core truth.

    Happy New Year' Eve to you & Family
    & to Everyone on this Blog

    ReplyDelete
  53. Bonnie said ref: the 3 guards : "they wait to announce this book after Michael is gone.".

    Yes. But their book is not even published yet ...will it ever be ? what stopped it from ? the official ongoing investigation ? the Jackson family ? any corporate identity ? no one knows, maybe only the 3 guards who - if their agenda is honest - they decided to put on hold or even to cancel, either to save their peace of life, if not more, or because they were ordered to. Any other possible shadowy agenda of theirs, I don't know of course. I however hardly see these 3 guys "used" by evil entities : they would rather be fired by a "group" & why not replaced by NOI.
    A theory of mine only.

    BONNIE on June Gatling - "If she wants to try to convince people that Michael was "deathly afraid.."

    June Gatlin: totally unknown to me until I heard the famous Video "Michael/Thome" largely recorded BTW on the US channels after 6.25.2009. Were in the end that "Video" & June Gatlin just FRAUDS ? if one may indeed prove it to me, then CASE CLOSED !...& as usual, we would "corporately" have all been "crooked" once again.

    ReplyDelete
  54. SandyK said - "We've seen how poorly Sony handled the release of that album recently with the questionable vocals and the like. An album containing songs that Michael left for his children; songs that should not be sold off in order to line the pockets of Sony executives. I feel very strongly about that and those feelings won't change."

    >>> I'm very happy to hear that. When I see how things are going and how certain bloggers are deliberately misleading fans, I just want you to know that I cannot entertain that on this blog. God is not the author of confusion or hypocrisy. So please don't take it personally if I don't post everything because I do usually look into the urls before I post them. I see how these people are working.

    There is no such thing as a "little bit of a liar" and when you take into consideration that THESE PEOPLE conspired and had NO REMORSE WHATSOEVER about DESTROYING THE INNOCENCE OF CHILDREN to bring Michael down, I really do not see how you can even post on that blog, but that is your decision.

    This is NO DIFFERENT then the placing of bombs on children in vietnam to destroy soldiers most of whom were not more than children themselves . . . Sandy THESE ARE THE KINDS OF PEOPLE we are dealing with! Arvizo? Chandler? Those children are dead! Maybe not physically but certainly in spirit because they EXPERIENCED UNCONDITIONAL LOVE and were manipulated into throwing it away. There is nothing left for them now. The people that DID THIS and are BEHIND THIS are the ones that THAT BLOGGER and their ilk are protecting! Just so you understand where my anger is coming from.

    With that, I am going to delete those comments about the Discovery Channel because it is a waste of time. No, on second thought, I will leave them, but no more will be posted about this. Anyone finding it worth their time to play this game, you go right ahead. There is a much bigger battle at stake and that show, existing or not, is akin to the enemy throwing pop caps in one direction to distract you while the shoot the crap out of you from another direction.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Josie said - "This Fake A Wish.com is one SICK Site!
    Yet, I am not surprised. Because we are dealing with some Very Sick People here.

    As to whether the story about the Autopsy Doc. is True or False, I wouldn't be surprised either way."

    >>> I agree with you 100%. I couldn't agree with you more. I found it amusing that the internet would allow or even advocate a web site that would assist others in writing up false headlines. The link came up on a Google search, but not the explanation for the site, only that Johnny Depp was dead.
    ----------------------------------------------

    Leslie said - "Thank you once again for your through work and although it shakes every single bone in my body reading the horrifying reality of these disgusting specimens who call themselves human, knowledge is power. So the saying goes. If we close our eyes or turn our backs, Michael will never be free, or his children."

    >>> This is just it Leslie . . . Michael has always been free. His isolation from the "normal" world kept him free from its influence. I wonder if he realizes now that his loneliness was purposeful, in that God wanted him separated from those who sought to twist his understanding of what he was discovering?

    One thing I know is that Michael is free. His children, thanks to they way they were brought up, are free. That is why they are such a threat and that is why they have to be protected. All those people that surrounded Michael are still trying to get inside the Jackson family via Miss Katherine, Joe, any of them.

    ReplyDelete
  56. PrincessGlam said - "It was clear that Michael knew EXACTLY what was going on around him, and periodically had a ‘spring clean’ of his staff, replacing managers and even bodyguards. Michael‘s managers over the years:

    1984-1989 Frank DiLeo

    1989-1997 Jim Morey/Sandy Galin

    1996–2003 Dieter Wiesner"

    >>> Princess, I could devote a series of blog entries to what you just posted. Be careful of what they are telling you. I don't believe Frank DiLeo was involved. Why? Because Michael was manipulated into firing him so they could get to him. This is when things began falling apart. Some of these interviews seem well intentioned and they are definately valuable for information purposes, BUT, check everything. I found if you stay close to Michael, much of this confusion becomes clear as to what they were doing.

    Princess this same pattern of deception is going on not just with Michael. Spanish moss is beautiful, but it kills trees. So does Kudzu, so does English Ivy. If we don't keep on top of it . . .

    ReplyDelete
  57. Princess cont.: "Eddie Murphy, and how he had got witnesses to recant their stories, and that the only witness not to do so had mysteriously fallen to her death. At this point, I started to realise that the idea that the deaths of Peter Lopez, Bruce Ayers and Sulema and Jerriell Wilborn, could be linked to the vampires and werewolves surrounding Michael Jackson,"

    >>> You're getting warmer.

    ReplyDelete
  58. LineCH said - "I however hardly see these 3 guys "used" by evil entities : they would rather be fired by a "group" & why not replaced by NOI. "

    >>> They were not replaced by NOI. They were replaced by AEG hired bodyguards which were NOT NOI.

    You said - ""Michael/Thome" largely recorded BTW on the US channels after 6.25.2009. Were in the end that "Video" & June Gatlin just FRAUDS ? if one may indeed prove it to me, then CASE CLOSED !."

    >>> What would you need to have it proven? We already know that Tohme did not have anything to do with NOI bodyguards and I've shown you who did. We already know that Sony trolls are and have been working to implicate AEG since before Michael actually died/disappeared. AEG is out there accusing or making ANY public statements other than the obligatory answer to lawsuits. They have neither blamed or tried to point the fingers at anyone. Tohme didn't work for AEG he worked for Barrack, so why does this matter?

    Because the timeline that has been sold to us through TINI and other groups affiliated with them is wrong. Colony was involved with Michael as far back as the trial. Tohme didn't come on board this thing until 2008. Tohme didn't tell Barrack about Michael, it is the other way around.

    We have to take the information out there, throw out the contradictory statements and piece together the coinciding info and then compare it to MICHAEL and what HE SAYS.

    That tape of June Gatling's? It is a matter of opinion, but that does NOT sound like a frightened and/or angry Michael. We also do not get a clear, uninterrupted listening to that conversation.

    These people are EXPERTS and piecing together fake vocals/overlaying vocals, noise, imposters and fill ins and selling an album as authentic Michael when THEY LEGALLY ARE NOT EVEN WILLING TO EXPOSE THEMSELVES BY LISTING MICHAEL AS LEAD VOCALS ON SONGS WHERE HE MOST OBVIOUSLY IS NOT.

    The Gatling tape? Sure, I can believe it is a fraud.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Anonymous asked me to post this since she's tried and does not know what she is doing wrong. I will add her name as soon as she tells me what username she wrote this under:

    I spend my evening (it's 01;10 right now) surfing the web and I came on the site of muzikfactory on the blog she posted on the 26th.
    There is an article about a book from Lynton Guest. I have never heard of the man but I thought it might be a good read.... When I got to the part of Michael being at the WMA 2007 and he was found by Beyonce in a foetal position and his performance after that was very bad. I thought I could check that one out for myself.

    1, it was in 2006 not 2007
    2, look at this clip around 5.00 Michael says he is not going to perform. http://www.facebook.com/l/cefb2YG3xsyCtYS5nPVMhRX-8UQ;www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4zS54ezG9Q
    3, He does not look scared or anything whatsoever so why does this man say these things.
    http://www.facebook.com/l/cefb2JguRP4jRd9pPoB9ta9mjWQ;www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKdiP8gsRs8&feature=related

    http://www.facebook.com/l/cefb2nr_lgC-Lt28B5kkFVigdUg;www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SMtPYYrHMs&feature=related

    It was also said that he was booed (in another article) of stage because he was going to perform thriller with Chris Brown but he didn't. When you listen to the YT clips there is NO booing going on AT all. Michael said he was not going to perform this explaines the time it took for him to get with the children on stage. But when he gets there he looks fine by me. Yes he did not sing to much but my guess is that he did not want to sing because the sound was not that great. Anyone could hear that. But you can see him enjoying the audience and you can see him put his fist in the air so maybe he was mad at someone (forging him to get on stage maybe?). Man... why do people do this! Needless to say I did not read any further...

    What you are telling me about Branca is no surprise (thanks for telling me first though!) he has his PR machine at work. When I first saw the wrap stuff I had a gut feeling it was pro Branca written and therefore not completely true. Wauw these men would do anything!

    Yes I have to agree with you about the blogger supporters and I read your comment to LG hee hee. I wondered about the big bye bye comments because if you want to leave just leave! If you want to know why you don't see them to much on your blog anymore you will ask them yourself won't you? Wel maybe it's because I am a very down to earth Dutch girl (we are known for that) but I always thought the big byebye's where overdone.

    In regard to the Mariah stuff we shared I have one big question altough I think money is the answer, why is she teaming up again with Mottola? She once said that this man was the devil, had her phones tapped and had here followed. Then why go back? Maybe it's a rumor though.

    Thank you again Bonnie I am going to bed now (it;s 01;35) and catch some sleep.

    Love,
    Anonymous

    ReplyDelete
  60. Bonnie said : "What would you need to have it proven"

    Once thing about me Bonnie you need to know I am also conciliatory but am a free mind & don't intend to turn my comments or have my comments turned into arguments. I personally play no games & do not allow anyone to play games with me either. I am just someone, like many others, trying to defend Michael by respect for the Human Being he was. The heated arguments or explanations, I do not need that these days. I am no devotee of any Blog but a devotee to Michael's Justice. That's all. BTW, one comment of mine you did not post although I made it nice. I do not care - do not post it, it's your Blog.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Bonnie said ">>> Princess, I could devote a series of blog entries to what you just posted. Be careful of what they are telling you. I don't believe Frank DiLeo was involved. Why? Because Michael was manipulated into firing him so they could get to him. This is when things began falling apart. Some of these interviews seem well intentioned and they are definately valuable for information purposes, BUT, check everything. I found if you stay close to Michael, much of this confusion becomes clear as to what they were doing.

    Princess this same pattern of deception is going on not just with Michael. Spanish moss is beautiful, but it kills trees. So does Kudzu, so does English Ivy. If we don't keep on top of it . . ."

    I do realise that what is said in documentaries is not always 100%. The problem I have is telling who is lying! The misdirection swirling around us right now makes me gasp. For the record, I don't think diLeo is a BIG "S" mole either. I was just illustratng the number of managers Michael had over the years, and the possible spring cleaning that was required.

    You are so right that we should listen to what Michael said - unfortunately he didn't speak about everything, so that is where I tend to step in the doo doo. That is why I value your opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  62. @LineCh - Actually, I honestly wanted to know what you were looking for in the way of proof of Tohme. The stuff I have already posted is not enough, granted, but it is proof that he was NOT involved in NOI and it was IMPORTANT for the other side to try and make people believe that he was.
    -----------------------------------------------

    @PrincessGlam - I KNOW what you mean. This whole blog has been turned into a "who's who" and I am shocked of what has come of this so far. I remember my surprise when Thomson's blogs and FB pages went down because of the Taraborrelli blog. It took a couple of "exposures" for me to get used to the abuse but as this happened, the patterns started emerging.

    No your right. Michael doesn't speak about EVERYTHING, but after the 2005 trial, he couldn't. We have only what he said in his songs, speeches and where to focus our research because of it. That is why this blog has turned into what it has turned into . . . because it was about MICHAEL . . . not defending everyone else BUT Michael.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Dear Bonnie,

    Just to which you a very Happy New Year, filled with love, health and everything you desire.

    As a New Year gift, here is a Michael 2011 calendar. Hope you like it.

    http://www.mjworld.net/christmas/2010/2011-calendar.jpg

    LYM
    Anapassionheart

    ReplyDelete
  64. @LineCH - You said "BTW, one comment of mine you did not post although I made it nice. I do not care - do not post it, it's your Blog. "

    >>> I'm sorry I forgot to address this. Which post was this that I did not post? There is nothing in the spam folder either. I did not delete any of yours today at all.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Hi Bonnie,
    One last word on the Discovery thing. They have CANCELED the show!!! I really wanted to share this with you, however, I do understand if you don't want to post this comment.

    Source:
    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6BS3VZ20101231

    ReplyDelete
  66. @LineCH said, “J. Branca played many years very bad games with Michael by favouring his client Sony's interests against Michael's, also his client. Strange "ethics".
    - Branca/McClain did not even drop in to pay their respects at the 2009 Memorial to their long-time valuable client Michael who still makes them richer each passing day.
    - Michael died/disappeared 12 small days before July 2010 when he could have finally recovered his music rights back from Sony when in 2002 already he should have been back into possession of them should the "good works" of J. Branca not have been on this Sony contract.
    - No single Sony delegate appeared at the 2009 Memorial but Sony continues to make a LOT of money on Michael's name.”
    “The above facts say it all. So those ignorant or cynical enough to "applaude" the Estate, it is their issue, not mine.”

    That’s what I’m talking about Line, thank you so much for emphasizing those important statements. Believe me those applauding Branca know all what you said but their support and love are for the estate executers not for Michael, as simple as that and it’s very sad.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Anapassion said - "As a New Year gift, here is a Michael 2011 calendar. Hope you like it.

    http://www.mjworld.net/christmas/2010/2011-calendar.jpg

    LYM
    Anapassionheart "


    >>> Please don't be offended, but someone already sent it to me. My husband won't let me print or hang it. He says he has his line in the sand, LOL!

    Hey Michael . . .wherever you are, it's a nice calendar :o) My husband still likes you, but not on my wall. ♥

    ReplyDelete
  68. SandyK said - "One last word on the Discovery thing. They have CANCELED the show!!! I really wanted to share this with you, however, I do understand if you don't want to post this comment."


    >>> SandyK! Shame on you! It's New Year's eve! Get off the computer! (snicker).

    Spotlight did email this to me earlier this afternoon. I still believe this would never have been shown. The biggest news was the fan's reactions to this, not the show itself as all the searches I did pulled up only tabloid and one LATimes article and forums posts about it.

    The T.V. shows link I didn't see it on their either until you posted it here. Thank you for finding it.

    Happy New Year! Now get off the computer. :o)♥

    ReplyDelete
  69. BONNIE said : "Actually, I honestly wanted to know what you were looking for in the way of proof of Tohme. The stuff I have already posted is not enough, granted, but it is proof that he was NOT involved in NOI and it was IMPORTANT for the other side to try and make people believe that he was."

    Many thanks for both your replies. My "little burst of bad temper" yesterday, I am sorry : was not meant to hurt you just to put things straight on my general thinking. It is true that I do not have your expertise so my somewhat naive comments on some issues may aghast. OK, Thome Thome is Colony Capital related. My basic problem however remains : WHO DID IT to Michael ? 1. Sony alone or 2. Sony-AEG related or 3. more positively, part of a bigger scheme aiming to save Michael ? only if crime there is, key indices may have been erased to ensure Michael passes for a drug addict or a suicidal person .. that would REALLY BUG ME if the Justice turns it that way.


    MIMI MESRAK : "Believe me those applauding Branca know all what you said but their support and love are for the estate executers not for Michael, as simple as that and it’s very sad."

    Mimi, I 100% agree with you & this is why I joined Bonnie's Blog & trust her comments. The criminal agenda of this Sony's greedy bunch is crystal clear & above any discussion. My only problem (I repeat myself here), as Bonnie & you may have noticed in some of my past comments is that I am still not at peace with the identity of the Sony related accomplices or any other people around Michael in the weeks till 6.25.2009.

    Sorry again if you both believe I'm a "pain", it is really not meant from me that way as I really DO enjoy reading all comments here. BLESS YOU ALL.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Happy New Year and I liked the calender link from Anapassionheart. That's a keeper!

    ReplyDelete
  71. Hi Bonnie,

    Happy New Year!

    If you haven't seen these videos from the UK, I thought you might like to look at them. It's a documentary called, "Michael Jackson's Secret Hollywood" Of course, there's reading between the lines required.

    As you go through the vids, there's reference to Scientology. While I think NOI is shady as all get out, I think Scientology is worse. I have lots I can say about the connections...

    Here's a youtube vid for Part I and the others will follow in sequence. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cE3ZOVeCpM&feature=player_embedded#!

    Here's a synopsis:
    Jacques Peretti lifts the lid on how the weird world of Hollywood really operates behind the scenes. For the first time since Michael Jackson's death, key players - including his lawyer, agent, private eye, a former classmate and personal spiritual advisor - shine a fascinating light, through Jackson, on Hollywood's hidden underbelly.

    From http://www.tvthrong.co.uk/documentary/michael-jacksons-secret-hollywood

    Written and presented by Jacques Peretti, Michael Jackson's Secret Hollywood lifts the lid on how the weird world of Hollywood really operates behind-the-scenes. For the first time since Jackson’s death, key players – including his lawyer, agent, private eye, a former classmate and personal spiritual advisor - shine a fascinating light, through Jackson, on Hollywood’s hidden underbelly.

    Peretti (The Rise and fall of Tiger Woods, Michael Jackson: What Really Happened and The Last Days of Jackson) gains unprecedented access to some of the people who really pull the Hollywood strings. He offers a rare glimpse into the Hollywood behind the smog and shows that Jackson, far from weird, was a perfectly normal Hollywood customer. He demonstrates how the machine created to service the star, ultimately, destroyed him.

    Made up of Rasputin-like figures working behind-the-scenes, Hollywood is designed to manage and control every aspect of daily life, and when necessary, make very big problems disappear. This is the deadliest circle of the Hollywood infrastructure, populated by private investigators and gangsters. According to private eye Paul Baressi, who is known as The Enforcer and has worked for a string of Hollywood greats including Jackson: “The Hollywood underbelly stinks, it reeks.”

    Attorney, Brian Oxman, describes the bare-faced stealing and power struggles amongst Jackson’s entourage: “The greed, the theft that was taking place around him was so enormous.” He also points to the people that directly led to the child abuse allegations in the city where “…everything has a connection with the porn industry.” As Jackson approached death - addicted to medication - he entered the hidden world of rehab. Howard Samuels - rehab doctor to stars including Lindsay Lohan - opens the doors of his clinic for the first time to give a taste of chemical dysfunction Hollywood-style.

    In Hollywood, cults like the scientologists are not what we think. When often your own family, let alone your entourage, will sell you down the river, Peretti argues that cults are not a crackpot side effect of becoming famous but a sensible insurance policy. The film explores Tom Cruise's career from the inside and concludes the complete opposite of what you’d imagine.

    But Hollywood demands a happy ending and 'Death agent' Mark Roestler shows there's life in Jackson yet. With a client list unlike any other, Roestler masterminds the post-death careers of the deceased – from Monroe to Elvis - and makes more money from celebrity corpses than living stars could ever dream of.

    Director: Mark Rossiter
    Written and presented by Jacques Peretti
    Executive Producer: Peter Grimsdale
    Production Company: Fresh One Productions
    Commissioning Editor: Hamish Mykura

    ReplyDelete
  72. Please disregard my earlier post.

    I've actually read the comments and I see that the secret hollywood documentary was already discussed here.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Bonnie said, "The T.V. shows link I didn't see it on their either until you posted it here. Thank you for finding it."

    You're welcome. I wanted to give you an update on that link. Although it was still there yesterday, as of today that program has now officially been removed from their on-line T.V. listing.

    http://www.yourdiscovery.com/tv-schedule/?type=search&country_code=GB&channel_code=DCUK-ENG&time_slot=16&date=13012011&search_string=What

    ReplyDelete
  74. Bonnie,

    Has Dr. Hoefflin been discussed before? I don't know what happened after he apparently wrote this letter a year ago.

    Do you know anything about this? He clearly calls out Branca.


    Reference: http://site2.mjeol.com/attachments/2814 ... tter12.pdf
    Statement from Steven M. Hoefflin, M.D., F.I.C.S., F.A.C.S.

    I am personally going to put a stop to all of the threats on my life and the threats against my family.
    I am now bringing out to the public all of the credible evidence in my possession on the corruption in Los Angeles Law Enforcement pertaining to the Michael Jackson Investigation. I am going to personally stop all of the threats from the LAPD on my life and the threats against my family. These are occurring because those members of law enforcement know that I possess abundant incriminating evidence that is going to put a lot of people in prison. I am not going to allow and will expose those people who are colluding together, such as Diane Dimond of Entertainment Tonight, with the police to use false documents to threaten me, obstruct my independent investigation into Michael’s death and to stop me from providing evidence to the proper authorities. All of the people that have been threatening my family and I that I have incriminating evidence on are going to be exposed with this evidence in the public eye so they will stop their attempts on my life that I have been experiencing for too long. For me to wait for the slow wheels of government investigations to catch on and bring these people to justice is no longer feasible. Colin Powell is a friend of mine.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Here's more of the letter:

    I have already called his house and left a message for him. I am asking him to engage a congressional investigation into all of the LAPD and Los Angeles Sherriff Department Law Enforcement Corruption in Los Angeles that is taking place in the Michael Jackson and other important investigations that is ruining our city. I want a Congressional Committee to subpoena these people, put them under oath, gather credible evidence for a good District Attorney, and bring them to proper justice. I have already asked Bob Woodward to report on this matter in the Washington Post. I am going to put an end to these threats now. I owe it to my family. I owe it to myself. But, most of all, I owe it to the public who always wants to know the truth and especially the truth about what happened to Michael Jackson. In reference to yesterday’s lawsuit filed against me by Dr. Arnold Klein, I am established Government Witness in the Michael Jackson Death Investigation. It is my clear opinion that Dr. Arnold Klein and his attorneys are attempting to prevent me from discussing incriminating evidence that I possess on Dr. Klein. They know that I have provided this evidence to the authorities. They also know that credible, incriminating evidence is going to be shortly released in my book. In my opinion and that of others, they desperately want me to stop any further investigation and to stop providing the public and the authorities the evidence that I acquire.
    It is my opinion that Dr. Klein is using a letter with falsified information sent to him by Howard Weitzman, Esq. In July 2009, I was asked to have a privileged meeting with Mr. Weitzman and another attorney. I shared incriminating evidence that I possessed on Dr. Klein and that he was under investigation by multiple agencies of the Department of Justice.
    Mr. Weitzman told me that he would neither talk with Dr. Klein, would not provide him any defense, nor would he assist his defense attorneys. On August 1st, 2009, after that privileged legal meeting, Mr. Weitzman prepared a letter with false information to Dr. Klein’s defense attorney, Mr. Charnley, in an attempt to discredit me. The false information in his letter was known to be false by both he and Mr. John Branca. Mr. Weitzman had told me he had discussed it with Mr. Branca. Mr. Weitzman falsely stated that I had no permission nor right to talk about Michael or his mother. H also stated that he and Mr. Branca did not condone me providing evidence to the public about Dr. Klein’s criminal activities, that may have actually contributed to Michael’s death, the very person who’s estate they now represent.
    Shortly after the publication of his letter containing false information, I had left Katherine Jackson’s home, and Mr. Weitzman, my wife and I had a telephone conversation. We requested that he provide a corrected letter to Mr. Charnley, to the media who requested a correction, and to send a copy to me. He already had the hand-written and signed consents from both Michael Jackson in March 1999 giving me permission to publically discuss his medical records and from Katherine and Rebbie Jackson from July 18, 2009 giving me permission to talk with the media about Michael. He told me that he had discussed the issue with Mr. Branca and that both of them agreed to provide me, Mr. Charnley and the media with a corrected letter. Both of them failed to do this despite having documents proving the information in Mr. Weitzman’s letter was false.
    On July 24th, 2009, I had corresponded about the issue of slander and defamation with one of Dr. Klein’s lawyers, Mr. Boyer. I invited Dr. Klein and Mr. Boyer to sit down with me and go over all of the evidence that I had on Dr. Klein’s criminal activities and that I would delete anything that they proved to be false. I never heard back from them. His client, Dr. Klein, also had knowledge of my being given consents by Michael Jackson and by Katherine and Rebbie Jackson to discuss Michael and his medical records.

    ReplyDelete
  76. and the rest:

    Dr. Klein, all of his attorneys Richard Charnley, Bradley Boyer, Susan Wootton and the firm “Ropers, Majestic, Kohn, and Bentley” together with Howard Weitzman and now apparently John Branca knew of the falsity of Weitzman’s letter, yet are attempting to use it in their attempts to bring a frivolous lawsuit against me, obstruct my testimony, and to discredit me.
    With this evidence, I have contacted the Attorney General of California, Jerry Brown. I expect that he will put a stay on this lawsuit because he would never allow a court to proceed in an action that would obstruct one of their primary witnesses (myself) in a federal investigation.In addition, I expect that he will now open an additional investigation into probable felonies that all of these individuals have committed in attempting to obstruct justice, intimidating a government witness with a document that is known to be false, and possibly other crimes.
    I believe that with this evidence, I now have a legal standing to bring a lawsuit against all of them, which I certainly will, for possible felonies committed against me. I am going to start providing the media and Michael Jackson’s fans all of the evidence that I have involving the Michael Jackson Death Investigation, the Corrupt Los Angeles Law Enforcement, and others colluding together to obstruct Justice. If anyone wants to file another slander and defamation suit, I suggest that they send a copy directly to the Attorney General of California Jerry Brown.
    Those trying to hurt my family and I should stop because all of the evidence that we possess will not be with us but with the public.
    Steven M. Hoefflin, M.D., F.I.C.S., F.A.C.S.
    Sincerely,

    Steven M. Hoefflin,
    MD,
    FACS Immediate Past President Los Angeles Society of Plastic Surgeons

    ReplyDelete
  77. AEG Court Document:

    http://alturl.com/ve3gq

    ReplyDelete
  78. @PY - Geeze!!!! Holiday over Bonnie! Get back to work!

    Could you have been a little more subtle? LOL!

    the Hoefflin info I have, but I never dug into it. As a matter of fact before you posted this I forgot I had it. Can you give me some time on this? The site itself is questionable but let me dig.

    AEG Docs . . . I have and have read. We can discuss them but I'd rather have the discussion on the most recent blog if you would like to put it there? That way it will get seen.

    Thank you!!!

    ReplyDelete
  79. SandyK said - "You're welcome. I wanted to give you an update on that link. Although it was still there yesterday, as of today that program has now officially been removed from their on-line T.V. listing."


    I did see that. That was easy, wasn't it?

    Did you see KF's twitlonger about Branca "giving credit to the fans" for getting it removed?

    I am not convinced the show was ever going to air. I am probably in the minority on that, but that is what I believe. There was absolutely no advertising of this show and it was about Michael Jackson. The backlinks of the T.V. listings was probably all Branca could talk them into. (forgive my cynism, but Branca is a roach).

    Again, thank you SandyK.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.