Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Michael Was Afraid They Were Going to Kill Him

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Michael Was Afraid They Were Going to Kill Him

December 16th – Possible Connection between Motolla, Death Threats and Michael


Last night we covered the song “Heartbreaker” tying in with the business deals made in the time period of Lisa Marie’s marriage to Michael.  During this time we also discovered through online resources that Tommy Mottola had offered Lisa Marie a recording contract with Sony in 1993 before her son Benjamin was born.  During this same time period, Michael went through the allegations, a strip search in his home, the turning over of management to his ATV catalog to Martin Bandier at EMI, marriage to Lisa Marie, endured the globally advertising for Michael Jackson “victims” by Sneddon, talked into settlement in the Chandler case, and talked into merging his ATV catalog with Sony all before his divorce to Lisa Marie in 1996.

So what did Tommy Mottola have to do with all of this?

Tommy is the “GateKeeper” of Michael’s Unreleased Music

Tommy Mottola was fired from Sony as CEO of Sony Music in 2003.  How is he “the gatekeeper” of Michael’s music?  Why did Matt Lauer not ask this question?

In 2003, Michael endured the humiliation of the Bashir documentary in February, Michael fired Branca the same day it was released in  the U.S. 

In September of 2001, Michael made this speck at a speech in Harlem against record companies defrauding artists, but listen to what Michael says, because he touches on a much broader and deeper agenda.

Harlem Speech for Black Artists, Sept. 7, 2001

At 2:09 Michael says, “I am really, really tired of the manipulation.” 
At 2:13, Michael says, “I am tired of how the press is manipulating the situation”.
At 2:32 Michael says, “They manipulate . . . they manipulate our history books.  The history books are not true, it’s a lie.”

After that he lost me.  Why?  Was it because he launched from that point into what was done to black musicians, songwriters and singers?  What he said was true.  You don’t see black artists on the covers of magazines.  It’s 2010 and you still don’t!  This isn’t the point of this blog post, but I did want to point it out because of what he said about the history books.  I also wanted to point out what is still in my head at times. When someone mentions the oppression of a race that is not your own, our ears close or want to close.  Even knowing what Michael went through I had a problem with this part of his speech.    I guess I wanted to hear that he was fighting for all artists, which he was, but he was addressing black artists at this event.   This is definitely something I want to cover in a future update, because this is important. 

Michael speaks of several examples, mentioning Otis Blackwell who wrote a number of Elvis’s songs,  then after a few shouts at 5:07, Michael states “I’m here to speak for ALL injustice . . .”

At 5:50 Michael goes through the list of allegations they used the press to lodge against him, citing his success as a black man.  Remember this was back in 2001.  Michael’s Invincible album had not been released yet (October of 2001) and Michael was in full battle with Sony.  I would like to submit that it just may have also been something else.  That those behind a certain ideology running the entertainment industry, couldn’t afford an artist as successful and world-revered as Michael, being such an effective witness for God, because he was.  I used the example of what they did to Yetnikoff when he began praying at board meetings.  Despite his excesses, Yetnikoff was canned after he cleaned up and became faithful.  Michael was attacked after he gained control of the third largest music publishing catalog in the world.    Control of the music/entertainment industry.  This is bigger and scarier than just the catalog.

Back to Mottola, he married Mariah Carey in June of 1993. First rumors about allegations surface in may 93. Michael was ordered under threat of prosecution to submit to a strip search in December  of 1993. Michael was on tour and cancelled some concerts because he had to go in rehab in November of 1993 for addiction to the pain killers they gave him during recovery of scalp reconstruction surgeries (Pepsi commercial accident).  He was pulled out of rehab when he learned of the order for the strip search and had to come home. 

It was during this time that all this was going on that he supposedly met Lisa Marie Presley, but she had been trying to meet him for months before that through one of Michael’s friends, to help her with a record deal.  Lisa Marie, allegedly Elizabeth Taylor and Michael’s (consisting of Grubman, Weitzman and Branca, who was back after a short hiatus from Michael), legal team decided that it was better for his health to settle out of court in January 1994.   

Michael is rumored (hate that word) to have requested from Mottola a $30 million check and a statement of support. 

Interesting from the book “Hit Men” by Frederick Dannen:
Yetnikoff thereupon ordered Grubman banned from the premises and told Tommy to begin directing CBS acts to other lawyers.  “Bust him,” Walter commanded.  “Take away Living Colour [a rock act]. Then tell Mariah to move.”

Instead, Tommy (Mottola) went to Schulhof.  Walter, he reportedly complained, was being “irrational,” unsettling “the team,” hurting Sony.  “Tommy was really shook up,” says a witness. “His loyalty at that point was more to Allen than it was for Walter.” By mid-August, this dawned on Yetnikoff, and he presented the Japanese with an ultimatum: it was either Tommy or him.

Word of the threat promptly reached Mottola, who began planning countermeasures with Geffen and Grubman.  Among the first, according to a highly knowledgeable source, was reaching out to Sony co-founder Akio Morita, through his goddaughter, Seiko Matsuda, a Japanese pop star with whom Mottola had spent many very long yet – according to Tommy – wholly professional evenings. Source  .

Proof Mottola has used the press to “leak” embarrassing/damaging information to the press for the purpose of manipulating opinion for a desired outcome, as was done most effectively with Michael Jackson’s career and personal life:

“That attempt failed, but an approach to The Wall Street Journal did not. Long suspected as a repository of Mottola leaks, the Journal reported on August 17 that Yetnikoff had recently signed a contract which would phase him out of the record group’s management. The “most logical candidate” to replace him, the paper noted, was his trusted lieutenant, Tommy Mottola.” Source - taken from the article, “Tommy Boy” – Vanity Fair, November 1996.


Dick Gregory Talks about Death Threats



Michael after battling for years with Sony, since the 1995 hijacking of his AT V catalog, and the deliberate sabotage of “Invincible”, Michael finally had it and went public, both with Al Sharpton and again in London, and again in protest outside of Sony in New York.

During the London protest, Michael taunted Mottola in his speech by mentioning Tommy’s divorce to Mariah Carey at 7:04 in this  video. 

7:04 Michael on Mariah Carey

One of the songs on the Invincible album, “Threatened”, contains the line, “Every time your lady speaks, she speaks to me".   
“You should be watching me, you should feel threatened
While you sleep, while you creep, you should be threatened
Every time your lady speaks she speaks of me, threatened
Half of me you’ll never be, so you should feel threatened by me

Listen to Threatened


It is rumored to be a jab at Mottola, but “Threatened was recorded in 2001 for the album “Invincible” and it is the last song on the album.  The album was not yet finished, so there was nothing to sabotage unless there was more going on under the surface at Sony at that time.  Mottola and Mariah separated in 1996 (same year Lisa Marie and Michael divorced) and divorced in 1998, so Threatened could very well have been written with Tommy in mind.

During 92 Billy Joel filed a suit because he had difficulties with Mottola, as revealed in the same Vanity Fair article above.  George Michael .   and so did George Michael in 1993. Source

Mottola with Clive Davis and L.A. Reid at VEVO Launch Party

Mottola and his partner in crime (at least with Michael) John Branca may have fed stories like this one to one of their media thugs, Friedman at Fox News (Friedman has since been fired from Fox and Hollywood Reporter because he’s such a gem of a human being). 

According to this article, amongst the rumor that Bubbles the chimp died from neglect (he’s still alive in an animal sanctuary, treated much better by Michael than Michael was treated by just about everyone in the business with “man” or “a” at the end of their last names), I found this:

“Michael's recording contract with Sony is over. His last release from the label will be a greatest hits set at Christmas containing four previously unreleased tracks.”

“My source says that on more than one occasion he has been present during speaker calls between Jackson and Sony Music President Tommy Mottola in which Mottola "threatened" Jackson. "Not physical threats, but certainly the threat that Michael would be destroyed and his career would be over if he didn't agree to Tommy's terms. It's Tommy saying 'I'll ruin you.’

The basis for all this? "The Beatles catalog," says my source. "That's it in a nutshell. This has all been done by Tommy in an effort to squeeze Michael financially. Tommy wants the Beatles catalog."


So according to Sony’s pocket-journalist, Michael was done with Sony . . . no ongoing relationship.  No good relationship.  No relationship . . . period.    Since Friedman fried his integrity by illegally downloading a pirated Hugh Jackman Movie “Wolverine” and getting canned from Hollywood Reporter, Sony had to find a new “heavy”, Johnnie L. Roberts.

Tommy Mottola is also practicing some damage control lately, through is wife, Thalia who claims that Michael and Tommy not only made up but that Michael came to their wedding.  (Time to find Samantha DeGosson and get some photo-shopping done, quick!  No pictures to document this Tommy?)  Not only that but Tommy leaving Michael Jackson alone with his wife . . . his YOUNG wife . . . Somehow . . . Nahhhh.  Source

He is also writing a memoir (since everyone else is and minions within the Branca fan groups have started pointing the fingers at him for Michael's problems), which will include a tell all about Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson, and we're hoping, Branca and Grubman (please, please!  Oh we want to hear about Branca and Grubman!)  Source  

We have one more blog update before the Christmas Present for Michael (and YOU).

God Bless you

24 comments:

  1. I am sorry, but Google was having problems tonight, either that or the weather out here (ice north of us) I did not get pictures loaded because Google wouldn't let me but I did get the blog with the videos up. I will add the pictures tomorrow when Google is sober.

    There are some typos in there but again Google is hiccuping, so please accept my apologies. I will fix and dress tomorrow!

    ReplyDelete
  2. hi bonnie.I've been meaning to write to you on several occasions but have been out of circulation after I posted some things beyond the Mottola dealings.There is more.you may recall that Michael had a joint venture in 97 with Prince Alwaleed,and they were going to produce Kingdom Entertainment.They did,with Mike's logo of Excalibur on the front.Somehow,it all evaporated.Kingdom financed HIstory tour and the prince sent his best PR to serve as road manager of the tours,though Paul Gongaware appears as this in both History CD's.I've checked the credits over and over.Paul Gongaware is nothing till Producer of TII?
    Michael had also some business deals with Schaffel that ended up in suing Michael on Marc's behalf having him end up having some shares of Neverland.The prince of Saudi Arabia is partners with Rupert Murdoch(owner of Fox,the sun,etc)who employed Bashir.AEG also financed all politics in CA.AEG,Colony,Murdoch and Prince Alwaleed are partners.the only connection was Phillips,who's sister was married to Tohme at one point.also related it appears to Halima Jackson.Barrack and Tohmme are lebanese.Prince's mom is lebanese...so you tell me.I think there is much more.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear Bonnie,

    Here is an article for you to check out!


    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,197585,00.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bonnie – great post as usual. Thank you for addressing the root cause of the problem.

    If Branca is really protecting Michael as some claims why deal with Sony now knowing their past relationship. Well, we all know the answer. Branca is more loyal to Sony than to Michael from the get go.

    I believe Tommy Mottola was embarrassed when Michael went on public and told the world the true nature of him, EVIL. I was surprised that Tommy did even hire a hit man to kill him since he was so ruthless.

    Bonnie, what you mentioned about Mottola feeding the media is very crucial in over all understanding of the abused Michael received over the years by the media. Corporations = media.

    It’s is not secrete the media most of the time and in fact all the time at the service of corporations. We see it every day in every way. Therefore, Michael’s abuse by the media really sprang from those who run the music industry that use the media to brainwash the population, and as Mottola said “I'll ruin you” and sure indeed finally put him to his demise or I might say to his disappearance, whichever one is true.

    Michael’s fans and those who are not fans but who love him dearly need to understand and learn the most fundamental lesson where the media abuse of Michael came from in order to have genuine fight that will end the continuation abuse of him even after he left us.

    If we continuously fighting the media without addressing the root source (the music industry and their allies who feed the media) our effort to vindicate Michael will never be achieved.

    Our strategy need to be changed.

    I can’t wait for your post about the music industry treatment of black artists.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi,Bonnie!

    You are doing wrong!!!

    The date on this video is wrong!!

    Michael had his speech against recording companies not in 2001 in September. It was on 6th and 9th of July in 2002 after his speech against Tommy Mottola in London on 15th of June 2002 . After his actions with his fans before Sony's office in London ( 15 of June 2002). After his action with his fans before Sony's office in New York (6 of July 2002). All of these events were AFTER release INVINCIBLE. And all of these events had been connected with Sony's sabotaging promoting his album - INVINCIBLE.

    There is the mistake on YouTube. You should check these dates in the book of Adrian Grant "Michael Jackson - Illustrate encyclopedia. "

    Michael was in New York during 6 - 9 of July in 2002 in Harlem with All Sharpton. And Branca and others bring their aka " Michael Jackson's Last Will" which had been signing by Michael in 7 of July in 2002 in Los Angeles.

    Michael's family said in July in 2009 right away that Michael wasn't in Los Angeles on 7 of July in 2002. Since Michael was in New York on 7 of July in 2002 with All Sharpton's " National Action Network". And hundreds of witnesses saw Michael in New York.

    But the court didn't acсept Michael's father and his attorney Brian Oxman's complain .

    Just check Michael's HIStory, Bonnie!

    With all my respect and love to you, Bonnie!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Darril - No the date on THAT video is not wrong. There was another speech that Michael did in July of 2002 and it is NOT THE ONE FEATURED ABOVE. Michael is dressed differently in THAT video and he is wearing sunglasses.

    The video ABOVE is the speech Michael did in Sept of 2001. He was already in New York remember, when the attacks happened because he was making THIS SPEECH in support of black artists in the recording industry.

    It is two separate speeches.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Amsu - I've never seen you post here before. I have covered AEG/Waleed/Colony/Tohme in many previous blog posts. I stand by my previous theories on their involvement with this at this time.

    You said - "They did,with Mike's logo of Excalibur on the front.Somehow,it all evaporated.Kingdom financed HIstory tour and the prince sent his best PR to serve as road manager of the tours,though Paul Gongaware appears as this in both History CD's.I've checked the credits over and over.Paul Gongaware is nothing till Producer of TII?"

    Paul Gongaware does appear on the credits of the HIStory CD's and as a producer in TII. So does Randy Phillips and he's never been associated with Michael in the past (rumor L.A. Gear commercial back in the 80's?) Yet people that worked with Michael for YEARS WITH SONY are the ones I am watching.

    Tohme's sister married to Randy Phillips. This doesn't mean much to me. Why are we assuming that Tohme even LIKES Phillips if his sister divorced him?

    You said - "Michael had also some business deals with Schaffel that ended up in suing Michael on Marc's behalf having him end up having some shares of Neverland.The prince of Saudi Arabia is partners with Rupert Murdoch(owner of Fox,the sun,etc)who employed Bashir.AEG also financed all politics in CA.AEG,Colony,Murdoch and Prince Alwaleed are partners.the only connection was Phillips,who's sister was married to Tohme at one point.also related it appears to Halima Jackson.Barrack and Tohmme are lebanese.Prince's mom is lebanese.."


    LOL, You know, we are ALL RELATED UNDER GOD. Maybe we are all in on it.

    Here is what I know: Michael is gone. I don't know where, but he is gone.

    AEG had something to do with it but I dont' at this point believe it is sinister (helping).

    Prince Waleed is NOT partnered with Murdock/Fox. Prince Waleed owns shares in the company . . . different story. That is like saying you are partners with Exxon because you owns shares of the company. Prince Waleed does not speak on behalf of Fox and quite frankly Fox would probably much rather see him gone.

    Prince Waleed IS PARTNERED WITH COLONY CAPITAL. The rest you can read throughout the blog.

    You ARE RIGHT . . . There is SOMETHING there.

    Here is what I SUSPECT -

    AEG was a "Bridge" only ONE could cross.

    Michael is gone . . . not dead.

    Something has been in the works since at least 2003 (the allegations, pre-trial investigations) to save his life.

    Tohme had a role to play in this, but not sinister.

    Tom Barrack is probably one of the few people Michael could trust. When all this comes out, I will know if I am wrong or not . . . so will you.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bonnie, Darril's reference to Michael's NY appearances with Sharpton July 6-9, goes back again to that Will of July 7th; which I've posted here and on other blogs; either the Will is a phony, fake, NOT Michael's signature, if made in LA on July 7th, Michael being in NY. I don't believe it was made in NY and stated to have been made in LA because the witnesses, McClain, Siegel and Green, were all California residents who would not have been in NYC. I can't find anything anywhere that says where Michael was on July 7th, so I continue to think he feared for his life while in NYC and ran out to LA signing his will in LA at 5 pm on Sunday, July 7th, UNDER DURESS, which is a valid ground for tossing that will; Blanket was born February 2002 and was not in Michael's previous will; UNDER DURESS he wanted to update his will; have the witnesses been questioned under oath? Green, Siegel and McClain, who knows? I don't see anything in the court records showing they were brought in to attest after Michael's death, to the credibility of the Will under which Michael's name and estate is being manipulated and used by those who claim to have loved him. A will proven to have been signed UNDER DURESS can be thrown out; this is a reasonable explanation, but IMO Judge Beckloff didn't do his job when admitting this will to probate.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Mimi said - "If we continuously fighting the media without addressing the root source (the music industry and their allies who feed the media) our effort to vindicate Michael will never be achieved.

    Our strategy need to be changed."


    >>> This is EXACTLY WHAT the Thomsons/Jones/Kunesh/Jacob's groups are trying to keep people from figuring out. I stated this much on another blog comment a few posts back. You hit the nail on the head.

    This is what they are trying to direct attention AWAY FROM . . . the root evil.

    Seeing that in the article about Mottola coupled with what Sony has done to defraud the public into thinking the forums gamers were posting on were actually outside gamers when it was a marketing company and the fake fan sites and facebook pages, it's not hard to put together what they did to Michael and how they did it.

    They are doing the same thing to get this album sold. Deborah Kunesh and the Margaret Hunter-types that insist on telling fans they are hurting Michael's children if they don't buy the album is about as close as you can get to emotionally criminal deception. This is how they tried to destroy Michael, using his love for children.

    These same people . . . SONY is using the fan's love for Michael to try to continue to do that.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Bonnie,
    I am going to get withdrawal sysmptoms whilst you are taking a well earned break over the holiday! You have put so much work into your blog, bless you.
    Going back to the topic, of course, on a more general level, people fear 'celebrities' like our Michael and of course Princess Diana, because they know that whatever they have to say is likley to be front page news. It knocks other people, like the President etc., onto page 4 or 5. Isn't it strange that as soon as these 'celebs' become more political (remember Diana's landmine campaign?) they seem to be 'silenced'?

    ReplyDelete
  11. @MarvelousMary - I have seen these rumors before and coming from Roger Friedman, can't say I believe 1/4 of what he writes. That article was written to smear BOTH of them.

    Why wasn't Elizabeth at Michael's trial? Well, Elizabeth Taylor is kind of up there in years. She is not in the best of health. That was only five years ago. Secondly, Marc Shaffel will have to testify if he loaned Michael money for any such gift.

    Thirdly, If you listen to Jermaine talk about what that state's justice system did to that family (only six seats for Michael's family/friends and a ton for the press), I don't think Liz could even get in there, even is she was Elizabeth Taylor.

    Interesting article but typical of the crap they were putting out back then to smear Michael and anyone that supported him . . . even badmouthing his family when everyone in his family TRIED to get into court and could not . . . Janet and Jermaine had to go to an upstairs room on the day of the verdict. The press was granted more seats than the family.

    YES! There is something HORRENDOUSLY WRONG WITH THAT.

    ReplyDelete
  12. June - Reliable resource tells me it was signed in New York. He did not want to sign it. When you look at WHO the witnesses were, can we REALLY assume that they signed the same time Michael did or that they were NOT in New York?

    Michael's travel was usually documented by the jackall press. However, these less publically visible people are less easy to track.

    I am going to go with my source on this one because of what was going on at the time. I can't imagine anyone flying across a continent just to sign something he did not want to sign, then fly back the same day to fulfill his appearance obligations. Logic tells me it was signed in New York, if signed at all (by him).

    My source told me he did not want to sign. They did not tell me that he DID sign it, only that he did not want to and that the meeting was in New York.

    ReplyDelete
  13. PrincessGlam said - "Going back to the topic, of course, on a more general level, people fear 'celebrities' like our Michael and of course Princess Diana, because they know that whatever they have to say is likley to be front page news. It knocks other people, like the President etc., onto page 4 or 5. Isn't it strange that as soon as these 'celebs' become more political (remember Diana's landmine campaign?) they seem to be 'silenced'?"

    >>> If you listen to Michael's songs, (of course you do) you can hear what they wanted to silence. Even Earth Song and We've had Enough . . . About God, asking God for help, Earth Song at the end he is pleading with people to look at what we are doing to what God gave us. In "We've had Enough", I love that song it is so moving, and the music short film for Earth Song, the end of it . . . (gasp!) God's renewal of everything we've messed up.

    We've had enough, someone put that video together for the song on Youtube and the "official" shows the twin tours going down . . . the powers that are behind these wars and the destruction of human life. Yes, the establishment wanted to shut him up.

    Just about that catalog? No.

    ReplyDelete
  14. To PrincessGlam cont. -

    Michael is a powerful, powerful performer and if his short films are any indication of what he wanted to do with coupling film with music, with the message he had, you can just imagine.

    They could not afford to let him loose to do this. I get little bumps on my arms and up the back of my neck just thinking of what he could do with film. Michael was a reader of history, religions and philosophies, the Bible and the history of culture/art.

    Michael's speeches and writings reveal his understanding of what entertainment was/is being used for.

    There are two types of people that giggle and point fingers at those who even mention the word "conspiracy" . . .

    Those that are followers

    Those that are behind it.

    They are NOT the people that read and do the research on their own.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Dear Bonnie,

    I thought I would have to nobly go through the days leading up to the holidays without a blog from you. So happy to see this one and maybe another 2?

    I truly hope the trap is set for the RATS.
    The great clean-up of Mattola and Branca is in effect. Unfortunately a lot of people believe that JB and JM is rescuing Michael's multi-billion dollar estate from ruin. They don't realise the lie so, therefore, they do not see the rape. Somehow, in the series, "The Wrap", Branca is responsible for Michael's greatest successes. Ridiculous, of course, but there you have it.

    In the industry, they all know that Mattola is a thug. There are many stories about his thuggish ways, even with the head of Sony. That child, Thalia just needs to return to her shelf with all the other wind-up dolls. Sorry.

    Insidious
    Oh, the executors of Michael's estate made a move against his mother. Tell me if you find anything wrong with that statement.

    Waiting for the next post. Love Always

    ReplyDelete
  16. Bonnie, back to "the Will" and your comments to me; like I said I could find nothing indicating these "witnesses" ever testified in Court after Michael's death during the probate of the Will, that yes, they were there, yes, that they were in the presence of each other, and yes, that they saw him sign it. This is what hangs me up, as I've never seen a situation where a subscribing witness to a "contested" will was not brought into court, put their hand on the Bible, and swear to these facts. If this had been done, then any falsehood or fakeness about the Will would have been brought forth at that time. SOMEONE has to have some information. You mention a reliable source which I would not expect you to reveal, but are you free to say WHY Michael didn't want to sign it? He had a new child, he was being threatened big time, he was an intelligent man. I would think he WOULD want to sign a will under those conditions. And those witnesses would not have been in NYC, McClain, Siegel and Green. I saw a copy of his will posted somewhere over a year ago that had THEIR CALIFORNIA ADDRESSES under their names before the addresses were blacked out by every source. There's no sightings of Michael anywhere on July 7, 2002; yes he was with Sharpton on the 6th and the 8th-9th; he COULD have flown to LA to sign a will on Sunday, the 7th; I do not believe Michael would have signed a will in NYC, with someone telling him, "well, that's okay, we'll get witnesses (California witnesses at that) to sign at another time". I don't want to goop this up with further rhetoric; however, IMO the Will is at the heart of Sony's rape of Michael's estate and would be Sony's ultimate revenge for past arguments.

    ReplyDelete
  17. hi bonnie,
    Michael said:(The messages come from 2003)"I left a day or so ago. I am very concerned. I don't trust that man. We think he's bad, we think he is Italian mafia."
    In this conversation, Michael talks about Mottola?
    Tommy Mottola is part of the Italian mafia?
    I'm sorry but maybe you have discussed this topic previously.
    Tonight I will pray for the whole Jackson family
    but especially for Michael and his children.

    ReplyDelete
  18. June said - "like I said I could find nothing indicating these "witnesses" ever testified in Court after Michael's death during the probate of the Will, that yes, they were there, yes, that they were in the presence of each other, and yes, that they saw him sign it. This is what hangs me up, as I've never seen a situation where a subscribing witness to a "contested" will was not brought into court, put their hand on the Bible, and swear to these facts."

    >>> Yes I know . . . and if Branca was so close to Michael, why did he have to wait until Miss Katherine filed intestate before Branca realized there was "no will" and came out of t he woodwork with this piece of garbage "oooh lookie here, state of CA! I have a will and lookie! I'm even the executor! Me and yeah . . . that guy! John McClain!" Then he suddenly shows up on "This is It" as executive producer with MCClain AFTER SONY BUYS THE RIGHTS TO THE FILM and puts their "finishing touches" and additional players in there. What a slimeball. (Grrrr . . . okay, I'm okay . . . little steam, that's all . . .)

    You said - "You mention a reliable source which I would not expect you to reveal, but are you free to say WHY Michael didn't want to sign it? "

    Michael was aware of what was going on in 2002. Do I know for sure why? No. Let me ask you this, if you were getting death threats, and you knew the people trying to strong-arm you into signing something you didn't want to sign had relations with who you suspected was behind the death threats . . . would YOU want to sign it?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Judith said - "Insidious
    Oh, the executors of Michael's estate made a move against his mother. Tell me if you find anything wrong with that statement."

    >>> If you are referring to the Howard Mann Lithograph book, they are going after Howard Mann. Kathleen is not mentioned on the documents that I saw.

    If it is something else, you are going to have to be more specific. I am answering between wrapping gifts, LOL so I am not researching today.
    -----------------------------------

    Daniela, that message sounds familiar but I'm unsure where it was or when it was made, but I do remember hearing/reading about something like that.

    This is not just Mottola and it is not just Italian Mafia . . . Jewish Mob involved throughout the entertainment industry.

    ReplyDelete
  20. @Judith, yes the execs are going after Howard Mann and his cohorts. I know you addressed this to Bonnie, but I just want to say this is one issue that makes me so angry and confused. Katherine is Michael's loving mother. I bought that book, Never Can Say Goodbye. It's a lovely picture book. Henry Vaccaro sold the contents of the Jacksons' storage locker to Howard Mann. I won't go into more detail, I'll become more mad! Vaccaro and Mann belong together at the bottom of the ocean. I believe Katherine just saw this business arrangement as a method to regain her possessions and have some control over her family's history. Otherwise Vaccaro would be peddling this stuff to the highest bidder. At least this way we know the venture has the blessing of Michael's mother.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Hi, Bonnie. Wonderful post as usual.
    This is a little bit out of topic, but have you seen this interview?
    Exclusive: Teddy Riley Talks New Michael Jackson Album (Video) - all very interesting but mainly and what he says at the end of the interview.
    http://thatgrapejuice.net/2010/12/exclusive-teddy-riley-talks-michael-jackson-album-video/
    LYM
    Anapassionheart

    ReplyDelete
  22. In the Harlem speech Michael said, “The minute I broke the all time records sell, they said I bleach my skin, I am a child molester, a homosexual……..” Yes, the media broadcast those horrific allegations. But pay attention to the most revealing point he made afterward. He said “this is all complete conspiracy, you have to know that.”

    Wow!! Michael really wanted the audience in that speech and us who will listen to his speech at any time to remember and not to forget who is behind the conspiracy to pull him down as he rose up as an artist who broke all records in his field, which is “the music industry.”

    I am really touched by that speech. Michael is really a good public speaker and a feisty one. I love it when he assert about what he wants and what's right.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Ana said - "This is a little bit out of topic, but have you seen this interview?
    Exclusive: Teddy Riley Talks New Michael Jackson Album (Video) - all very interesting but mainly and what he says at the end of the interview."

    Well Teddy is lying about that being Michael's vocals on those three songs. Teddy works for Sony. He was paid by Sony to produce the album so for me to sit here and expect him to be truthful about something that is his bread and butter is too much for me to ask. I guess Michael is the only artist from that outfit with any integrity and Teddy didn't learn a damned thing from him.

    The other squalking he did about Michael being alive. Sony believes it, why shouldn't he? Interesting interview Ana . . . thank you. :o)
    --------------------------------------------

    @Mimi - Thank you for posting that. Yes, how often did he have to tell us? Those rediculing "conspiracy theories" (Charles! Deborah!) are rediculing Michael.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Darril - I deleted your post because you were being a pain in the butt.

    Everyone knows that Michael was in NEW YORK BETWEEN SEPT 7 AND SEPT 11, 2001.

    He was ALSO IN NEW YORK on July 5 - 9, 2002.

    You want proof?

    http://www.michaeljacksonjustice.com/MJ_Speech_Harlem_2001-2002.htm

    Now, take a close look. You may be able to explain Michael changing clothes for the SAME speech but AL SHARPTON TOO?!!

    It was two different speeches. Two different years! Both are searchable on the web.

    It might help if you stop reading that "other" blog. They are confusing you.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.