Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: The Murder of the King of Pop, Part 5

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Friday, January 28, 2011

The Murder of the King of Pop, Part 5


The Murder of the King of Pop, Part 5
The Pedophile Threat


Matthew 18:17: And if he refuses to hear them, tell it to the church. But if he refuses even to hear the church, let him be to you like a heathen and a tax collector.

If you got through all that information yesterday my hat off to ya!  If you haven’t you have make-up work to do on yesterday’s blog, “Social Engineering and the Entertainment Industry”.

Today I want to tackle the motive for the “ATV/Northern Songs” catalog and the whole “giveth and taketh away” campaign.  I also want to discuss what I believe to be Michael’s motivation in protecting it and why he believed they were aiming for the children.

One of the biggest tip-offs that Michael knew what they were up to is this song he wrote and performed, here:

They Don't Really Care About Us
In the beginning of this video, we see children clapping and chanting “All I wanna say is that they don’t really care about us” and, “We know the truth!” 

Children on a school playground behind a chain-link fence.  Did we have these around children’s schools before World War II?

Before the first verse starts we are met with images of multiple police beating civilians with night sticks, kicking them, images of rioting and blacks ganging up on a white truck driver (Rodney King riots everyone), white people ganging up on blacks and beating them and a baby screaming in the background.

Next you see Michael sitting in a prison and the first verse consists of labels and slurs. . . names given different ethnic and religious groups:

“Skin head, dead head, everybody gone bad . . . Situation, aggravation, everybody allegation . . . In the suite, on the news, everybody dog food . . . bang bang, shot dead, everybody gone mad . . . All I wanna say is that they don’t really care about us . . .”

Did you listen to the whole song?  I chose a version that had the lyrics right up there on the screen.  Judging by the length of Michael’s hair and his look, I would say he was still married to Lisa Marie when this was filmed (circa “Childhood” era).

What’s the next verse? 

During the chorus and the next verse, Michael’s video takes place in a lunch hall inside a prison.  Then he launches, in his own prison cell, into the next verse:

“beat me, hate me, you can never break me . . . Will me, thrill me, you can never kill me, Jew me sue me, everybody do me . . . kick me kike me, don’t you black or white me . . .” and he launches into the chorus again.

The Calling out of Ethnic Separation via Hatred

DIVIDED WE FALL . . . EASIER CONTROL

The next part (I don’t know if this is considered a bridge in this song or another verse) “Tell me what has become of my life . . . I have a wife and two children who love me . . . I am the victim of police brutality . . . I’m tired of being the victim of hate, Their raping me of my pride oh for God’s sake, I look to Heaven to fulfill it’s prophecy . . . set me free”.

Then:

“Tell me what has become of my rights, am I invisible because you ignore me . . . Your proclamation promised me free liberty, now . . . I’m tired of being the victim of shame, you’re throwing me in a class with a bad name . . . I can’t believe this is the land from which I came . . .”

“I really do hate to say it, the government don’t wanna see, but if Roosevelt was living . . . he wouldn’t let this be”  (I could tell Michael a thing or two about Roosevelt).  We had two Roosevelts for president.  The picture shown in the prison cell was of FDR, our only three-term president and the enactor of “the New Deal”. 

Franklin D. Roosevelt


FDR (Franklin D.) was the one that enacted many of the federal programs that regulated businesses and expanded the government, one of which was the head-counting of the social security system.  My grandfather told me how unpopular that mandatory new tax was.  Even though it was voted against by popular vote, it was put into place “temporarily”.  It was supposed to be a “savings account” for the working individual so they would not be broke when they retired.  It was supposed to be voluntary AFTER the war, and it was supposed to be paid back to the individual, with interest.  By the time first contributors of that tax become of age, the Social Security System had completely morphed into a permanent, mandatory contribution in which you received monthly payments until you died.

Today the Social Security system tracks your every move, job, your health records . . . everything.  And if you haven’t been paying attention most in this generation who have paid into it are NEVER going to see their investment.  They keep pushing the retirement age back.  Last mention in the news, the Social Security System is due to go broke in

Roosevelt was also the one that began the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.  Both programs began, as most did, with good intentions.

One good thing Roosevelt did was refuse to get involved in the war, instead offering funding to allies of Britain.  His hand was forced with the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor.

Roosevelt did not live to see the end of the war.  He was the only president to serve three terms.  Ironically it was after the war and the death of Roosevelt that the Tavistock Institute was founded as a “charity” organization and the Legion of Nations became the United Nations.  And Tavistock became more than just a mental clinic using the psychological methods developed in Hitler’s Germany.  The ending of the war was the perfect opportunity to get into this country and get established.

Woodrow Wilson


The actual selling out of our country actually began before Roosevelt.  In 1913 Woodrow Wilson signed over Sovereignty of the United States to the Federal Reserve Bank with the Federal Reserve Act, coerced by those owning the central bank, which included the Rockerfellers and the Rothschilds.  A private banking system was effectively given control over our government’s issuance of currency, the setting of interest rates and wouldn’t you know it?  A mere 16 years later began the “Great Depression”.  Many families and small businesses lost their fortune, but certain elite “old money” interests actually prospered. 

Woodrow Wilson was immediately regretful of his decision:

"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country.
A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit.
Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation,
therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men.
We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely
controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world.
No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by
conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by
the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." 

“Paul Warburg’s Crusade to Establish a Central Bank in the U.S.” provides interesting reading . . .

“In paying tribute recently to Henry Wallich, late member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, Bankers Magazine noted that Wallich was a successor, in more than one respect, to Paul Warburg. Both of these board members were emigrants from Germany—and from the higher circles of German and European finance.”   Source  Read “Warburg’s Early Banking Experience” further down on that document.  Very revealing.  The Federal Reserve Bank powers worship this guy.

We still have a Rockerfeller in congress today.  There is the short of the history. You can follow up on all this on your own.  Please read the Key Laws enacted that effect the Federal Reserve, such as the “Federal Income Tax”.  That’s right, your taxes go to pay private bankers who have NEVER BEEN AUDITED SINCE THEIR EXISTENCE.

These are the people who fund Tavistock.  These are the people who cause our wars and infiltrate their agendas into our children’s educational programs and entertainment.  Same people . . . same pattern”.

Jesse Jackson Interview Again

Interesting, at 0:39, he calls it “ana-gossip”.  From my Bible Study I know “Ana-Baptist” were “re-baptizers”, meaning they didn’t believe infant Baptism was what the Bible taught so they would “re-baptize” people that had been baptized as infants by the early Catholic church, after they were old enough to understand the purpose.  “Ana-gossip” . . . Re-gossip or “repeated” gossip.  A Tavistock  training staple.  Listen to the early part of this video closely.  He says “It’s the same pattern I told you before with these people in the past . . .” He Knew.  He goes on to talk about the fight over the catalog, because now that their “experiment” did not work, they wanted it back.  Michael was a “disobedient” artist.

Modern Media Infiltration

The popularity of Television increased and only three years after the end of the war, the Ed Sullivan show debuted in June of 1948 on CBS and ran until 1971 . . . two years before he died.

Interestingly I missed this yesterday.  On the “politics” listed on Ed Sullivan’s wiki page it says:

“Reacting to the Cold War fervor of the 1950s, Ed Sullivan worked closely with Theodore Kirkpatrick of the anti-communist Counterattack newsletter. Sullivan would check with Kirkpatrick if a potential guest had some "explaining to do" about his politics.

“Sullivan wrote in his June 21, 1950 New York Daily News column that "Kirkpatrick has sat in my living room on several occasions and listened attentively to performers eager to secure a certification of loyalty."[20] Jerome Robbins, in his PBS American Experience biography, explained that he was forced to capitulate to the House Un-American Activities Committee, identifying eight Communist sympathizers and disgracing himself among his fellow artists, because Sullivan threatened to reveal Robbins's homosexuality to the public Source

The problem with this was that anyone questioning the U.S. Government’s activities were labeled “communists” as was done with Lennon. 

I was familiar, thanks to some of the reading on Tavistock, with some of the methods they used to “train” and “educate” and found some disturbing similarities to what was done to Michael Jackson.

From the Greg Hallet Interview linked on the blog of the 26th:

- Using evidence of pedophilia as a threat, to control people (they tried to do this to Michael, threatened to expose him in order to control him)

*However they had to “create” the evidence. Enter the manipulation of introducing Evan and Jordan Chandler through a “breakdown” of Michael’s car in front of the Schwartz-owned “Rent-a-Wreck”.  How CONVENIENT.

- Promoting pedophiles in order to control others further down the hierarchy (I don’t know names but can guess a certain large corporation might be involved?) Source – Greg Hallett Interview.

* We have several journalists who have printed and published blatantly vicious and salacious articles through various tabloids and media shows.  Halperin, Taraborrelli, Dimond, Crosby, Sawyer, O’Reilly, Friedman, Roberts amongst others come to mind.  I can’t say with any assuredness that any of them are pedophiles or that their bosses are pedophiles, but a number of the names above mentioned are gay and back when this started, it was still a socially frowned upon to be gay.

Michael Jackson – “Look what they did to George Michael . . .”



We also learned that the Institute had reference in their history, “The Beatles” first hit with George Martin, “Please Please me”.

Also with the help of one of your fellow commentors (PrincessGlam) other “Michael” similarities:

- Deconstruction of the minds of the public, to stop free thinkers and those that can use the power of their mind, who eventually become part of history (we know Michael felt he channelled his creativeness from elsewhere, and he has already gone down in HIStory)

* Using mass media, the television, now the internet.  They tried to pry Michael away from God.  They failed.

- Simplified and erroneous information fed to the public through the media, to further deconstruct their minds (yes, another method to try to take Michael down).

* Very effective wasn’t it?  Many are still resistant to any other possibility than that Michael was guilty of crimes against children when in fact he was trying to STOP it.

- Fake trials of supposed terrorists, to further delude the public (I burst out laughing at this one, because if Michael turned the tables and faked his death and followed it with a fake trial of Murray....)

* If Princess is right here, it might explain the almost comical incompetency of Dr. Murray. 

I am no longer in danger of mentioning these things because it is apparent that the “bad guys” already know.  How do I know?

Because of the campaign put in place to stalk him, divert the attention of millions of fans using fake Facebook groups and identities, photo-shopped pictures, the TINI web site and it’s origins and elaborate (since changed) web host, the various twitter stalkers and attacks on the Jackson family members and the infiltration and manipulation of the fan base.  All of it is proof that this is bigger than one doctor, a few people in Sony management and some contrived vendetta of a couple of police officers and a now retired D.A.

The ONLY WAY what happened to this man even makes sense, with a cooperative press and media here and across the big pond, law enforcement, political officials and a corporation in charge of his career all in collusion to destroy him, is to look beyond just a battle with a music label over a music catalog.

I have to cut this off because it is getting too long.  Part 6 is coming, but I want to break it up with a couple of “tabloid” issues that need to be addressed.  Plus, my husband wants to actually see me this weekend.

Next time we are back on this subject, we will dig into how they are getting to our children and where it started.  What Michael did is take on this fight by himself and somewhere got help along the way. 

This is hard stuff to take seriously and they are hoping you don’t.  If you had tried to bring this up to me five years ago, I would have pushed off the subject.  I said to my husband just last night, “You know, you don’t want to believe this is real, it’s insane!”  But those of faith know it’s coming.  Most never thought they would see it in their lifetime.

Michael, God bless you wherever you are.  Seriously . . . Thank you.



Two thousand years ago, a Roman Senator suggested that all slaves wear white armbands to better identify them.  -"No," said a wiser Senator. "If they see how many of them there are, they may revolt."


Laws enacted under the Federal Reserve Act

70 comments:

  1. The song “They don’t really care about us” is very powerful. Oh Bonnie, bless your heart. How would I know all this without you? No way, truly.

    Is that true they, I don’t know who they are, will not let him record the video here in America and he has to go to another country? Yes, he was still married with Lisa at that time. I remember Dian Sawyer's interview with him and Lisa that she asked him about the verse on that song “Jew me sue me” if he was trying to disrespect the Jewish people.

    It seems like Ed Sullivan was used as a puppet and given a platform on his show to fulfill his bosses command in molding his guests in ways they want them.

    I strongly believe now it wasn’t really about the catalog they were trying to destroy him; it was about the message he was spreading against what has been done to our children and to those who have been oppressed systematically for so long.

    I am still not quite sure why he fought hard to hold on to the catalog if it’s not for the value that is worth? I also remember what you said long time ago in one of your blog that they knew what his capability and what he could do if he embarked on producing and directing movies, and they would not take a chance to let him do that. I see the truth in what you said now clearly.

    Whatever they did to this man is unforgivable and very cruel. I wonder how they are going to pay for it and if we ever going to see that.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bonnie, thank you so much for all of your hard work. I always enjoy being enlightened and consider my life journey a learning experience so I am learning yet again.

    To be open minded and a free thinker is such a blessing but especially today because of technology and the effect of globalism. We are all targets for "deconstruction" and manipulation and when you consider that mainstream media is by and large controlled by a small number of huge and wealthy corporations, it is frightening to consider the possibilities of what agendas they can push on the population.

    Just a thought Bonnie - do you believe that Tavistock was behind the McCarthy era in the States? It seemed to be a purging of anybody considered to be a free thinker or a threat to so called "democracy" at the time. History has always attributed it solely to the cold war but perhaps there was more behind it than meets the eye.

    I am awaiting your next part Bonnie. Jesus was considered a threat by the Romans and the Jews in his day because of his disdain of their very control. He advocated looking to a higher authority and was murdered for that very reason. Other prophets of peace have also been persecuted. Gandhi was murdered and Nelson Mandella was imprisoned for years and years. I believe that God's truth will always prevail in the human spirit.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mimi said - "Is that true they, I don’t know who they are, will not let him record the video here in America and he has to go to another country?"

    >>> I heard a rumor about that but can't confirm.
    ------------------------------------------------

    Mimi said - "I remember Dian Sawyer's interview with him and Lisa that she asked him about the verse on that song “Jew me sue me” if he was trying to disrespect the Jewish people."

    >>> You know this is a song they didn't want out there when they nit-pick like this. It was okay to leave all the other slurs in there but not the Jewish ones? Michael explained that he was pointing out the stereotypes being used to incite distrust and hatred among people but they weren't interested in that because it WENT DIRECTLY AGAINST THEIR AGENDA.

    You said - "I strongly believe now it wasn’t really about the catalog they were trying to destroy him; it was about the message he was spreading against what has been done to our children and to those who have been oppressed systematically for so long."

    >>> Bingo! Add to that a bit of oppression of the sharing of God's message, this was out and out persecution. Never thought I would see anything like this in my lifetime. Color me disgusted.

    You said - "I am still not quite sure why he fought hard to hold on to the catalog if it’s not for the value that is worth? "

    >>> It was to protect the artists on it and keep control of it's use away from THEM. There may have been other reasons, but with everything I've researched brings me closer to these two reasons.

    -------------------------------------------

    ReplyDelete
  4. Karin said - "do you believe that Tavistock was behind the McCarthy era in the States? It seemed to be a purging of anybody considered to be a free thinker or a threat to so called "democracy" at the time. History has always attributed it solely to the cold war"

    >>> I do not know enough about that to say for sure. I can tell you that in the research listed here and the previous blog that there are some people that believe the Cold War was "engineered" and some even go so far as to say that Kennedy was at first on board, then had a change of heart and that is why he was assasinated, but??? I have more research to do on that. What I would like to concentrate on is more what is in their plan from here on out because that is what Michael was trying to tell us.

    You are so right about the persecution of truth having a deep and diverse history.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bonnie – do you know Michael’s sister Rebbie Jackson was on the View? I thought the ladies from the View were going to talk about her, but no it was all about Michael until the end where they asked one question about her.

    She was asked about his drug use as usual and her answer was also as usual, how the family tried several interventions to get to him.

    If the family are saying he had drug problems, then they are talking about to the contrary of the autopsy result which found no long term drug use of any kind in his system. What I don’t understand is the word interventions they use whenever they are asked about the drug as if he has one.

    Here is the link:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWx-ChwpIC8

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bonnie said:

    I do not know enough about that to say for sure. I can tell you that in the research listed here and the previous blog that there are some people that believe the Cold War was "engineered" and some even go so far as to say that Kennedy was at first on board, then had a change of heart and that is why he was assasinated, but???

    - - - -

    Interesting that you mention that about JFK Bonnie as both he and Martin Luther King were in my thoughts after reading your blog.

    Can anybody help me out? Is the Tavistock system the same as the Illuminati? I have seen videos on YouTube about the Illuminati but to be honest I dont know enough about them. There are those who believe that the Illuminati was responsible for Michael's death.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I know who Halperin, Taraborrelli, Dimond, Sawyer and Friedman are.
    O’Reilly is the guy on Fox news?
    Who are Crosby and Roberts what are there full names?

    I think Nancy Grace, Martin Bashir, Oprah and Maureen Orth should also be on the list.

    ReplyDelete
  8. BonnieL said...
    "SandyK said - ""I dedicate this to Ronni. Anything I get, I will dedicate to Ronni." Warren won her Golden Globe for "You Haven't Seen the Last of Me," performed by Cher in the movie musical "Burlesque." (THR)"

    >>> that was very interesting. I very much appreciate you taking the time to post that. Did Ronnie do the publicity on Burlesque or did she just attend the premier?"

    Source:
    http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2011/01/michael-jacksons-starry-night.html


    ~~~~~~~~~~~~Bonnie, it appears that R. Chasen's only involvement with "Burlesque" professionally was as Diane Warren's publicist. As you already know, R. Chasen was shot after leaving a party she went to that occurred shortly after she attending the premiere screening of the movie "Burlesque."

    Quotes concerning R. Chasen:

    "Chasen was walking the party with her client Diane Warren, who wrote the song "You Haven't Seen The Last Of Me" for the film's soundtrack."

    Source:
    http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/11/ronni-chasen-described-as-happy-go-lucky-in-moments-before-fatal-shooting.html

    "Chasen has represented such entertainment luminaries as the late actress Natalie Wood, composer Hans Zimmer, and move producers Dick Zanuck and Irwin Winkler."

    "Hollywood publicist Howard Bragman, who worked with Chasen on a number of projects, described her as “a lady and a grown-up” in an industry of flash and impermanence.

    “She had been doing this forever. She had a lot of class, a lot of style and a lot of intelligence. She was just very, very well-respected,” Bragman said."

    Source:
    http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/11/slain-hollywood-publicist-had-attended-cher-movie-premiere-before-beverly-hills-attack.html

    ReplyDelete
  9. Mimi, "I am still not quite sure why he fought hard to hold on to the catalog if it’s not for the value that is worth?"

    Why fight for the catalog? Michael clearly had the name recognition and the respect as an artist. In order for him to do the kinds of movies and other projects that he may have wanted to do, and communicate the kind of message he wanted, he needed more than that, he needed to have money, and lots of it. Having the catalog gave him the ability to borrow large quantities of money at a moments notice. Any creditor can see that the catalog as collatoral makes Michael a risk worth taking. The Sony/ATV will always increase in value over time. He bought what was originally called the ATV publishing catalog for around $50 million in the 80's and it's worth well over $1 billion today. The highest believable estimate that I've seen is $5 billion. (He sold 1/2 of it to Sony for an estimated $95 million in 1995. Two years after the first allegations and the beginning of his money problems.) With that kind of potential access to capital, Michael would be able to control the content of any film he made with out someone else diluting his message. He could be an independent film maker that would not have to bow down to the Hollywood power ellites. Simply put, the catalog means freedom to create what he wants to create. He would be the master of his own destiny and not feel forced to be someone else's performing puppet. Ultimately, he wanted to be a media mogul on the scale of Merv Griffin. At one time, Merv Griffin's name was on almost everything. He was one of the most powerful people in that industry. Unfortunately, that kind of opportunity was being taken away from Michael by chipping away at his credibility with ugly false allegations and repeated negative press over many years, as we are all painfully aware of. Of course, this reduced his earning power, increased his debts, causing him to rely heavily on the catalog to reduce debt as opposed to being a source to obtain capital for movie projects or any other project for that matter.

    At the end of the day, maintaining the catalog was a means to maintain financial credibility wich ultimately leads to power, independence and freedom. That's why he ABSOLUTELY needed to keep it.

    Also, as Bonnie said, he may very well have wanted to protect the widely diverse collection of artist's on it as well.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The deception is very old in origin. The deception began long before the United States came into being.

    As for the purpose of the Tavistock, it was not an experiment but a definite. Look at the generations affected since then.

    Michael new what they were really doing and why. If you look at the armband Michael wore in his video and it looks like a 777...He wore the true name of our creator written in paleo Hebrew. That name has been "purposely" hidden by them so that humanity would remain in the dark. There is great power in that name. The lengths that they have gone through to hide the truth is barely comprehensible. The manipulation of the scriptures....People we are a witness to the domination of the world and ownership of our souls are what is at the center....

    Michael tried so hard to tell us and now through investigating his death we are finding more truth than we imagined...It's deep, very deep.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Mimi said - "do you know Michael’s sister Rebbie Jackson was on the View?"

    >>> No, I do not watch The View. I have seen it a couple of times and I don't like it. Bunch of women complaining with no offered solutions. Another show devised to divide and conquer.

    You said - "If the family are saying he had drug problems, then they are talking about to the contrary of the autopsy result which found no long term drug use of any kind in his system."

    >>> I've gone over this before too, and while Michael MAY have been drugged, he was not a drug addict. I think there may have been attempts to make him one. The family answers questions like this very carefully. They don't talk about WHEN the interventions took place and they NEVER put the word "drug" and "intervention" in the same sentence . . . they let the deceivers do all the talking. Smart!
    ---------------------------------------------

    Karin said - "Is the Tavistock system the same as the Illuminati? I have seen videos on YouTube about the Illuminati but to be honest I dont know enough about them. There are those who believe that the Illuminati was responsible for Michael's death."

    >>> "Illuminati" is the word that most people fear of even using in a sentence for fear of losing any credibility. Why? Because it's been pounded into our heads that admitting you entertain any thought of a "conspiracy" somehow puts you in a "class with a bad name", like "unrealistic" or "crazy" or "conspiracy theorist".

    Instead of using "Illuminati" I prefer "deceivers" because that is what they have done. That Tavistock Institute is funded and directed by those few men in power that want a one world government controlled by them, yes, but it is only one of the tools. Consider it a "basic training" facility for those that want to be part of "the system".

    ReplyDelete
  12. LoveMJandGod said -"I know who Halperin, Taraborrelli, Dimond, Sawyer and Friedman are.
    O’Reilly is the guy on Fox news?
    Who are Crosby and Roberts what are there full names?"

    >>> "Oh-Really" is on Fox News, yes . . . The "untruthful" and "unbalanced" that "Cares about Me". Rita Crosby was with (Fox News Live, and Inside Edition), Johnnie L. Roberts wrote for the Wall Street Journal, Newsweek and now writes for "The Wrap". Consider Grace, Oprah, Bashir and Orth added. :o)
    ---------------------------------------------
    SandyK said - "Bonnie, it appears that R. Chasen's only involvement with "Burlesque" professionally was as Diane Warren's publicist."

    >>>> thank you for the info. :o)
    -----------------------------------------------

    SandyK said to Mimi - "Michael clearly had the name recognition and the respect as an artist. In order for him to do the kinds of movies and other projects that he may have wanted to do, and communicate the kind of message he wanted, he needed more than that, he needed to have money, and lots of it. "

    >>>>>>> In 1995 he already had a partner and substantial financial backer . . . Prince AlWaleed. They were blackballed and Michael was screwed over by Spielberg, amongst other "friends". All these "friends" he had in the business and the financial backing in 1996 to do what he wanted and the stonewalled him. Everyone in the industry.

    Nobody asks why? If he had all this respect, name recognition and still had the bargaining chip of the catalog, then what the heck happened?

    >>>>> The last five blog updates is what happened. They didn't just want to take the catalog away from him, they wanted to stop him from undoing what they had been in the process of doing for decades. True taking the catalog away was ONE of the ways to stop him, but WHY DID THEY ALLOW HIM TO HAVE IT IN THE FIRST PLACE?

    Branca was key on orchestrating that whole mess, at the beginning.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Miss Shae said - "As for the purpose of the Tavistock, it was not an experiment but a definite. Look at the generations affected since then."

    >>> You're right. Tavistock was not an experiment, the "Beatles" were and perhaps, "Michael" was but that experiment broke out of the lab . . . didn't he?

    You said - "If you look at the armband Michael wore in his video and it looks like a 777...He wore the true name of our creator written in paleo Hebrew."

    >>>>> THANK YOU!!!! Excellent observation and timely posting of it.

    You said - ".It's deep, very deep."

    >>>> We're going to find out how deep, aren't we?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Also Miss Shae -

    Has anyone noticed what has been going on in Egypt lately? Tunisia? Keep an eye on this stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Bonnie said, "Has anyone noticed what has been going on in Egypt lately? Tunisia? Keep an eye on this stuff."

    And the EU (European Union), mainly Prince William...

    ReplyDelete
  16. Bonnie,
    I am honored that you re-used my comments in your blog! I am going to Greg Hallett's website now to see how to reconstruct someone's mind....

    ReplyDelete
  17. Miss Shae said - "And the EU (European Union), mainly Prince William... "

    >>>>>>>>> I wonder if Michael ever got to meet Princess Di's children?

    --------------------------------------------------

    PrincessGlam said - "I am honored that you re-used my comments in your blog! I am going to Greg Hallett's website now to see how to reconstruct someone's mind...."

    >>>>>>>>> I liked the way you outlined the methods of deconstruction. It was better organized than what I had so I scrapped it and put your outline in there so I could better elaborate on it (and it made more sense that way).

    If you can do that with the "reconstruction" I would be so very grateful!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Commenting bit by bit as I read and things strike me.

    "His hand was forced with the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor."

    Are you sure about that, Bonnie? I know he was a beloved President. My own mother would get very angry with me when I questioned Roosevelt's integrity.

    "III. The Warnings That Went to Hawaii

    We have now seen that the President in Washington was conducting a war against Germany, though no declaration of war had been made and that he had, as Mr. Lippmann put it, declared "economic war on Japan" while American Army fliers disguised in Chinese uniforms were bombing Japanese troops and American ships were ferrying armaments to the Chinese armies. These were skirmishes preceding the grand scale attack.

    We have seen that the President had decided on all-out war with Japan but that he was maneuvering Japan into a position to attack first and that he succeeded in this. That attack came on December 7 at Pearl Harbor, the Philippines, Guam, Malay and other points. We have seen that the President went before the American people and Congress and declared that we had been "surprised" and that Japan had struck while we were engaged in an effort to produce peace in the Pacific. The appalling disaster the government blamed upon Admiral Kimmel and General Short, in command at Pearl Harbor, on the theory that they were not on guard against an attack about which they had received ample warning.

    First of all it must be understood that as soon as the astounding nature of the defeat was known there was a very general hustling by everyone in authority from the President down to provide themselves with appropriate alibis."

    http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance189.html

    I'm beginning to believe EVERYTHING we thought we knew was carefully crafted illusion. Maybe that's Michael's parallel intent.

    ReplyDelete
  19. "The problem with this was that anyone questioning the U.S. Government’s activities were labeled “communists” as was done with Lennon."

    communists/extremists/terrorists...the key word changes by era, according to the fears they have instilled in the masses. Have you noticed that?

    "- Using evidence of pedophilia as a threat, to control people (they tried to do this to Michael, threatened to expose him in order to control him)"

    You know what I find interesting about that? It's about the human psychology of accusing others of what you are guilty of.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weSzkIB8184

    ReplyDelete
  20. Bonnie,

    This Travistock, Illuminati, New World Order, Federal Reserve Bank, Global Take Over is all behind the Persecution and Murder of Michael Jackson.

    Yes Indeed It Is!!

    He wanted to change the world for the better with LOVE and JESUS.

    He wanted to use the catalouge for $ to make movies about LOVE - FAMILY - AND JESUS.

    That's why he was murdered.

    I agree with you 100%.

    The Anti-Christ will be on the scene real soon!

    Maranatha = Come Lord Jesus!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Truthbtold - "Are you sure about that, Bonnie? I know he was a beloved President. My own mother would get very angry with me when I questioned Roosevelt's integrity."

    >>>>> Well, I'M CERTAINLY NOT going to get angry with you. ( can't rewrite ALL of history in a couple of blog updates, won't fit). Yes, publicly after Pearl Harbor, he had to get involved in the war. Roosevelt was right BEFORE Tavistock was established as a "charitable institution" but after the F.R.A. Wilson put into place. You are most free to comment and correct or fill in what I miss (mainly trying to focus on Michael while pealing all this back at the same time), which brings me to this . . .

    Didn't Michael know about Roosevelt when he put that video together? What was point of Michael glorifying him in that video? That's okay, I used to think Reagan was a good guy too . . .

    You said - "and American ships were ferrying armaments to the Chinese armies. These were skirmishes preceding the grand scale attack."

    >>>>>>>> That's right. You're right and I should have should have elaborated, especially since we are familiar with the missionary that was shot and killed by the Communist Chinese against the Nationalists and our own men. This is how John Birch was killed. We FUNDED THEM!!! On Pearl Harbor you are absolutely right.

    (Kenny Ortega - The Illusion Starts Tomorrow)

    ReplyDelete
  22. Bonnie,

    Once Michael called out Sony/Mottolla and made music with a Political Message, he (Michael) started making Enemies in High Places!

    I remember when I first heard his song "They Don't Really Care About Us." I remember how I Cringed when I watched THAT video on M-TV for the first time!

    I said to myself, "Micheal! Are you trying to take on the Whole United States Government ALL BY YOURSELF?"

    "Michael! You are only 1 person!"

    I knew at that moment, that Michael's life was in great danger!

    I am really surprised that Michael lasted as long as he did.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Truthbtold - "communists/extremists/terrorists...the key word changes by era, according to the fears they have instilled in the masses. Have you noticed that?"

    >>>>>>> Yes, I have. And every staged incident a reason to remove one freedom at a time.

    You said - "You know what I find interesting about that? It's about the human psychology of accusing others of what you are guilty of.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weSzkIB8184 "

    >>>>>> I noticed that. TINI is full of them. Charles Thomson is just learning the art, but he's really bad at it and the Ganesha Om members create a new web identity for every lie they tell.

    ReplyDelete
  24. ROFL!!! I'm sorry Truthbtold:

    "You're right and I should have should have elaborated,"

    I keep turning my head to watch what is going on in Egypt on the T.V.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Truth said, "I'm beginning to believe EVERYTHING we thought we knew was carefully crafted illusion. Maybe that's Michael's parallel intent."

    Now you are getting the picture. The conflicts in world history leading up to present day seem to follow a pattern. Look at the assignations in the US alone, they have a pattern. It is one particular entity that has a hand in everything but it is the ones behind the scenes that are the most dangerous yet they make up a unified body.

    Truth if go look at pictures of royalty figures and a certain religious leader past and present you will find something in common with light man in the This Is It.

    I am certain Michael knew and that is why there is a common theme in his work just like it is a common theme and pattern in thiers. We need to put our spiritual hipboots on because we are in deep deep water.

    ReplyDelete
  26. @Bonnie you said, “The View...I have seen it a couple of times and I don't like it. Bunch of women complaining with no offered solutions. Another show devised to divide and conquer.” I agree. I don’t watch it either. I just found the video and thought when is the media stop asking the same tired question over and over again and make the family uncomfortable.

    The last 5 blogs updates are the most eye opening. The need to have POWER & MONEY by few men enslaves the majority of human minds and become the greatest deceivers that ever exist in human history.

    For many years, I have lived in third world country that the government was still is handpicked puppet of USA. People there have no freedom of anything practically. No freedom of speech, no free thinking, no freedom of movement, and nothing. The government and very few percentages of privileged citizens control everything throwing few crumbs to the masses.

    You want to know what mind control is, you will find it in such society. Nobody trusts anyone. Not even you own family. If you find speaking negative about the establishment, you will be eliminated execution style, and no joke.

    What great “FEEDOM” we experience in the Western World. We can express what we feel in writing, speaking, organizing, protesting and dialoging among ourselves with no fear of prison or death.

    Here in the Western Worlds, brainwashing to oppress and divide and conquer the masses is very delicately crafted and very subtly design through different means such as the media to fulfill the mission with the hidden agenda.

    I have heard this long time ago. Human beings can try to do whatever to hurt one another, but in the final analysis no one escaped the hands of God.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Today, January 29, 2011, on studies of Cologno Monzese, Milan, has flown an airplane with a banner: MICHAEL JACKSON CHANGE CHARGES
    TO MURDER
    It was all funded by fans of Michael, who have voluntarily contributed by paying a sum as they wish, up to the amount needed.
    Bonnie see how much love for Michael?
    After Bonnie!

    ReplyDelete
  28. They Don't Really Care About Us:
    “Tell me what has become of my rights, am I invisible because you ignore me . . . Your proclamation promised me free liberty, now . . . I’m tired of being the victim of shame, you’re throwing me in a class with a bad name . . . I can’t believe this is the land from which I came . . .”
    Dear Bonnie, these words in the song of Michael make me very ill.
    The injustice in the world exists.
    Michael, with his songs he repeated constantly. He made us feel his pain, he feels the suffering in the world.
    We know that the powerful decide our lives. Michael fighting the powerful and injustice.
    He saw that the children were the most 'suffering, the more' vulnerable in this society 'world.
    I love you Bonnie!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Bonnie, thanks for responding to my question about the Iluminati. I feel really unsophisticated and a bit naive but now get the idea. You're right, it doesn't really matter what name desribes it - deception is deception in any language.

    Well, it's ironical. Branca facilitated buying the catalogue for Michael and now he has snatched possession of it. At the risk of being accused of indulging in conspiracy theories (heck what do I have to lose?), we were always told to follow the catalogue and guess where the trail leads to?

    ReplyDelete
  30. @ Bonnie ~

    I didn't mean to be confrontational. I often write what I would say if I were sitting across the table from you but obviously vital facial expressions and body language are missing. My intent is only to put out what I find...for correction and comment, to learn. I'm no expert on Roosevelt or any of them, am sometimes shocked at what I find, just trying to untangle the mess in my mind.

    I don't always mention MIchael in my comments but he is the reason, your blog the vehicle for continuing his mission, exposing what he knew, or sure would be interested in knowing with help from friends.

    "Didn't Michael know about Roosevelt when he put that video together? What was point of Michael glorifying him in that video? That's okay, I used to think Reagan was a good guy too . . ."

    That was my thought - that Michael was not yet aware of the Roosevelt charade. Wow, Reagan too. Yet, Michael's belief in Roosevelt can still stand - as testimony of generational manipulation and the process of awakening. I honestly can't say I've liked any president since Kennedy.

    "ROFL!!! I'm sorry Truthbtold:

    "You're right and I should have should have elaborated,"

    I keep turning my head to watch what is going on in Egypt on the T.V."

    That's OK Bonnie, no problem! But now I'm confused! Do you think the analysis on that link is correct, REAL history?

    What is going on in Egypt is what awaits us all if we stand together in protest. I've only been reading about it, might be time to turn on the "news".

    Egypt: Draconian law sparks protests
    A law that gives police wide-ranging powers is challenged after the death of Khaled Said.

    http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/egypt/100628/egypt-public-protests-government-brutality

    "global" kinda makes me cringe. Pavlov?

    http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/01/whats-happening-egypt-explained

    ReplyDelete
  31. @ MissShae ~

    Thank you for that information!

    "It is one particular entity that has a hand in everything but it is the ones behind the scenes that are the most dangerous yet they make up a unified body."

    Unity is the key, which is why they work so hard to divide us, keep factions alive and busy tearing one another apart. WE so outnumber them!

    "Truth if go look at pictures of royalty figures and a certain religious leader past and present you will find something in common with light man in the This Is It."

    Ok, I will watch again with THAT in mind.

    "I am certain Michael knew and that is why there is a common theme in his work just like it is a common theme and pattern in thiers. We need to put our spiritual hipboots on because we are in deep deep water."

    Well...that statement just gave me shivvvers!

    Thank you again MissShae!

    ReplyDelete
  32. @ MissShae ~

    "Truth if go look at pictures of royalty figures and a certain religious leader past and present you will find something in common with light man in the This Is It."

    I believe I know which country's royalty figures and which religious leader. I may be thick but I don't see it...hint, please?

    I do notice that Light Man appears to have two left hands though. I wonder why?

    ReplyDelete
  33. @Truth,
    Lightman in TII is holding a sphere or orb. This is a link that may help you gain some insight and you can research further.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDQSWerokow&feature=related

    While you look for pics or paintings of current and past royals you will notice that it changed or should I say something was added over time.

    ReplyDelete
  34. This was posted by Appolo 3 times on the same blog entry (number one) and he is complaining that I am not allowing "opposing" opinions. This is his post:

    apollo c vermouth said...

    ....Most everyone here remembers the sounds of the Beatles and their early works. “Love, Love me Do”, “I Wanna Hold Your Hand”, “Hard Days’ Night”. The Righteous Brothers they were NOT! They stunk! They weren’t even cute! (except maybe Paul). How in the world did they get so popular? What kind of marketing anomaly took place?

    You are foolish if you believe this is a starting point for trying to base the Beatles successes on some nefarious activities and/or secretive organizations.
    A house of false cards that undermines later arguments and significantly challenges your credibility on anything that follows.
    You might fool some of the people some of the time but it doesn't take competent historical evaluation to recognize the absence of reality in your facts.
    Your storyline can be easily dismissed as very many people have been paying close attention to the Beatles for 50 years.

    Better luck next time.


    I've posted these comments twice already but they were apparently not allowed.
    Seems any opposing opinions are not allowed?

    ReplyDelete
  35. Appolo said - "You are foolish if you believe this is a starting point for trying to base the Beatles successes on some nefarious activities and/or secretive organizations.
    A house of false cards that undermines later arguments and significantly challenges your credibility on anything that follows.
    You might fool some of the people some of the time but it doesn't take competent historical evaluation to recognize the absence of reality in your facts.
    Your storyline can be easily dismissed as very many people have been paying close attention to the Beatles for 50 years."

    >>>>>>>>> Apollo, EVERYONE has an opinion. I have BLOG with REFERENCES. You accuse me of being historically inaccurate without any references to prove your point.

    A house of false cards is EXACTLY what I am uncovering. My credibility again, is referenced, yours is not.

    Where is your "competent" historical facts? I invite you to "easily dismiss" what I've posted. But if you are going to come here trying to start an argument without any basis of fact OR references for what you want to accuse me of, I will keep deleting your posts because we have more important things to do than DEBATE YOU.

    Fair enough? Thank you for your post.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Appolo - Just so you understand the difference between a BLOG and a MESSAGE BOARD, I am NOT OBLIGATED to entertain your insults. If you would like to insult me, please take it to Twitter. Thanks again.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Truthbtold - I have information on the light man for you but I'm not posting it here. It's not time.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Truthbtold and Miss Shae -

    "Yes, there are plenty of indications in the Bible that the religion of the ancient Israelites evolved from tribal polytheism to national monotheism over time. Archeology is confirming this. Google "Yahweh and his Asherah" or "Samarian Yahweh". The earliest indication of the existence of Yahweh is from the 9th c. BCE and shows he was the household god of an extended lineage group and not the national god."

    This was a posted comment further down on that video posted by Miss Shae.

    This is taking this blog off track. This blog is about what they did to Michael, who did it and why. We are finding what they did to US.


    Getting into discussion at this point about whether or not the Bible was translated correctly from the Hebrew or Greek versions, and what certain ancient ceremonial objects were back in the Old Testament is not going to help us at this time.

    What is going on today? Who is behind it, how are they doing it and why? Connecting that to Michael has already been done. Let's keep this tight, Miss Shae . . . agreed?

    ReplyDelete
  39. Thank you MissShae, trying to understand and will look to see what's been added over time.

    Bonnie ~ Thank you, I'd really appreciate receiving that.

    ReplyDelete
  40. "Getting into discussion at this point about whether or not the Bible was translated correctly...ancient ceremonial objects..."

    Oh, that's what it was about! Kinda flew over my head. I'm telling you, THICK I can be.

    Point taken here too. Tight ship, hiyi dee-ho on this front cap'n. :o)

    ReplyDelete
  41. The Beatles, A Tavistock Creation ??
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1OuQrXJQjg

    I listened to the You Tube Tavistock 'interview' where a spokesman asserted that new 'code' words like 'rock', 'teenager' and 'cool' were not used before the Beatles arrived on the world stage.

    Sure, like 1950's songs with these common references didn't really exist.

    And that Tavistock was behind the British 2nd (music) Invasion 'every inch of the way'.
    The Tavistock spokesman claims that when the Beatles first arrived in the US their music had not been played here. So girls were paid $20 and bused out to the airport to greet them.....Unknown/not heard, I guess in spite of having the #1 single and album (Billboard magazine) at that very time, Friday 7 Feb 1964.

    Of course the concept starts that a mystery Tavistock related person (Adorno) actually wrote Beatles songs! And the name The Beatles was chosen by Tavistock. They were a 'carefully crafted plot' by Tavistock.
    And that Tavistock was connected with the death of John Lennon, who was about to 'blow the whistle'.


    I've checked some other references and whatever Tavistock is (I don't much care), I don't need to reference Winipedia (apparently your typical support) to challenge these patently phony and absurd statements.
    Believing and/or relying on these ludicrous comments and then further linking the Beatles and Tavistock to Michael Jackson undermines certain theories and assertions.
    An agenda to anoint Jackson with Sainthood or see him as an Angel delivered to Earth cannot be supported using this form of underpinning.

    The Tavistock material indicates your willingness to stir into your pot of conspiracies material that cannot be realistically supported. So what else in the 'pot' might be but shallow references justifying connections that simply have no basis in fact?
    Certainly like minded Michael Jackson supporters may accept wide reaching facts. But others with a better grasp of history simply can't ignore mistaken obvious and mistaken details.

    Tainted broth makes a whole stew of ideas unpalatable.
    Better luck next time.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Bonnie said "If you can do that with the "reconstruction" I would be so very grateful!"

    I haven't found as much detail on reconstruction/deconstruction (I think I'd need to buy Greg's book) but here goes:
    One of the KGB methods to reconstruct the mind used music.
    - Music is used to keep the conscious and unconscious mind busy, whilst the message is directed to the subconscious. The message could be carried via sound pulse or lyrics.(Maybe this is why Michael's 'angry' songs are so powerful? 'They Don't Care about Us' and 'Scream' could be talking directly to our subconscious, telling us to sit up, listen, and take action?)

    ReplyDelete
  43. Bonnie,
    I just remembered another deconstruction tactic:

    - the destruction of the family in order to achieve destruction of patriotism. (We know from his Oxford speech in 2001 that Michael already saw the destruction of the family, and wanted families to take steps to repair the damage).

    ReplyDelete
  44. Thank you Bonnie~Your words are liberating and filled with truth. God bless you....With love and respect, Leslie

    ReplyDelete
  45. I understand what you are saying Bonnie. I am not intentionally attempting to take this blog off topic in any way. In order for me to understand Michael and his message I am looking below several layers to make an honest attempt to understand the total message.

    I am only "sharing" my thoughts because, as I am discovering, it all ties in....

    I have no problem with you sensoring my comments and refusing to post them if you feel they are not relevant to the topic and or lead the discussion astray.

    I posted that video only as a aide that may lead to further research, as I stated in my previous comments. I am also aware of the use of the word Yahweh and its origin. As for the translations, it is a direct example of the deception that Michael and we are living "Today". Tavistock was just another tool.

    In my comments I am only expressing my thoughts in response to your blog and all the comments as they spur futher thought. Nothing more and nothing less.

    If you deemed it neccessary to not post some or all my comments I will not be offended, this is your blog.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Truthbtold . . . You sent me your email address correct? I'm not sure which request you are, LOL! That is why I have not sent yet. Is there a "G" anywhere in your name?

    ReplyDelete
  47. Hi, Bonnie

    Wonderful post as usual.

    This is all connected, Tavistock, New World Order and Codex ALIMENTARIUS.

    Please watch this video. This summarizes everything very well.

    http://www.viddler.com/explore/wauksdachurch/videos/2/

    LYM
    Astreajustice

    ReplyDelete
  48. Appollo said - "I listened to the You Tube Tavistock 'interview' where a spokesman asserted that new 'code' words like 'rock', 'teenager' and 'cool' were not used before the Beatles arrived on the world stage.

    Sure, like 1950's songs with these common references didn't really exist."


    >>>>> How old are you? If you listened to this, why are you misquoting it?

    You said - "The Tavistock spokesman claims that when the Beatles first arrived in the US their music had not been played here. So girls were paid $20 and bused out to the airport to greet them.....Unknown/not heard, I guess in spite of having the #1 single and album (Billboard magazine) at that very time, Friday 7 Feb 1964."

    >>>> Where is your reference? Again misquoted. They were #1 where? Where? They were NEVER HERE before that very time here. They had never played the States.


    You said - "Of course the concept starts that a mystery Tavistock related person (Adorno) actually wrote Beatles songs! And the name The Beatles was chosen by Tavistock. They were a 'carefully crafted plot' by Tavistock."

    >>>> No ADORNO DID NOT WRITE THEIR SONGS. ADORNO DIED in 1966. George Martin did not even write their songs. George Martin wrote their MUSIC and ARRANGED their music following ADORNO'S INFLUENCE.

    You said - "I've checked some other references and whatever Tavistock is (I don't much care), I don't need to reference Winipedia (apparently your typical support) to challenge these patently phony and absurd statements. "

    >>>> What reverences? If you can't post them why are you here? Wikipedia is also not the ONLY reference used. I used them ONLY to reference who George Martin was, The timeline of the Beatles. Tavistock I got from THEIR OWN WEBSITE, as well as a few published books.


    You said - "An agenda to anoint Jackson with Sainthood or see him as an Angel delivered to Earth cannot be supported using this form of underpinning."

    >>>> Ah . . . I understand where this is coming from now, LOL. Okay, I don't think Michael is a saint (There is one though!) but I'm sure he would be flattered with the title. And your insults cannot be supported without any references. But your posts sure are revealing.

    You said - "The Tavistock material indicates your willingness to stir into your pot of conspiracies material that cannot be realistically supported."


    >>>> The Tavistock material, again, is posted on their very web site. You have not realistically UNSUPPORTED THEM. F for Fail.

    You said - "So what else in the 'pot' might be but shallow references justifying connections that simply have no basis in fact?"

    >>>> Wow . . . the only question presented in your whole diatribe. Disprove me. You still have not posted one reference to debunk me. Your insults might impress a fifth grader but they're not doing much to convince any of the readers here.

    You said - "Certainly like minded Michael Jackson supporters may accept wide reaching facts."

    >>> What would you know about like-minded Michael Jackson supporters?

    You said - "Tainted broth makes a whole stew of ideas unpalatable.
    Better luck next time. "


    >>> That is about the dumbest attempt at sounding witty I have ever seen. "Better Luck Next Time" is the same exact cut-n-paste you put on the last three attempts to post here.

    Since you have nothing intelligent to add and seem to value elementary insults as references your posting days here are done. We have learned nothing from you. Thank you for wasting our time.

    ReplyDelete
  49. PrincessGlam said - "One of the KGB methods to reconstruct the mind used music.
    - Music is used to keep the conscious and unconscious mind busy, whilst the message is directed to the subconscious. The message could be carried via sound pulse or lyrics.(Maybe this is why Michael's 'angry' songs are so powerful? 'They Don't Care about Us' and 'Scream' could be talking directly to our subconscious, telling us to sit up, listen, and take action?) "

    >>>>>>>>> Music is a very powerful medium, I agree. Michael liked the "marriage" of music to imagery and knew how powerful that was. Michael knew how they were using it. THEY apparently found out how Michael WANTED to use it.

    Saint Michael . . . LOL. Still laughing. This is what happens when the vampires are "outed.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Princessglam said - "- the destruction of the family in order to achieve destruction of patriotism. (We know from his Oxford speech in 2001 that Michael already saw the destruction of the family, and wanted families to take steps to repair the damage). "

    >>>>>>> That . . . you're absolutely right. We are going to get more into that, but if you look at what has happened to the FAMILY in the last 50 years . . . The slow and gradual destruction of the family through increase in cost of living,

    insertion of the generation gap,

    introduction to (what they considered) vulgar music,

    the gradual acceptance of certain behaviors both in the mass media and in public (Does anybody question what the heck the FTC even does anymore? Because they sure don't police the airwaves anymore!)

    The acceptance of the wedging of government institutions between parent and child (teachers taking students over state lines for abortions), the handing out of condomns . . . the GOVERNMENT SUBSIDY OF DRUG ADDICTION . . .

    I could go on. Great contribution Princess and you are right. Michael was gently trying to GRADUALLY break into that arena with his speeches . . . 2000 and 2001, right about the time the REAL ABUSE began.

    ReplyDelete
  51. I just now sent you another contact request so you don't send it to the wrong person. ;o)

    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  52. Leslie said - "Thank you Bonnie~Your words are liberating and filled with truth. God bless you....With love and respect, Leslie "

    >>>>> I hope you are not using your real name . . . we have trolls. Thank you for your comment. I had a very good conversation with Spotlight on the phone today in regard to Michael and even though I cannot post all of it, she brought up some very good points.

    Get ready to get angry.
    -------------------------------------------

    Miss Shae - "I am only "sharing" my thoughts because, as I am discovering, it all ties in...."


    >>>>> I have a lot of information for you, but we don't want to miss anything in the "rush" to connect the dots. There are a lot of signs that may or may not mean what we think they mean.

    If this will help:

    In reference to Michael -

    Why?
    How?
    Whom?
    With What?
    Where(When)?

    We want to stick close to Michael and you're correct in referencing TII . . . we will get into that if you can just hold on. :o)

    I do not feel any need to not include your posts. I just don't want to lose Michael in the rush. ♥♥♥ Your input is valuable here.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Why?
    How?
    Whom?
    With What?
    Where(When)?

    I just had a sudden urge to play Clue!

    Sorry, didn't mean to butt in. :o)

    I agree, your input is valued here MissShae.

    ReplyDelete
  54. @Appolo - For your reference:

    George Martin considered 5th Beatle.

    George Martin, composer for Beatles.

    George Martin, Musical Score writer for Beatles, Paul McCartney and the Wings, Ringo, amongst others:


    http://www.george-martin.com/

    http://www.beatlesagain.com/bgeorgem.html

    http://beatlesnumber9.com/martin.html

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2jHbwE4DdM

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3R8f6UloOYU

    http://emusician.com/ms/beatle_tech/fifth_beatles/to_sir_love/

    http://www.amazon.com/My-Life-George-Martin/dp/B00000DFE9

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6665771

    http://georgemartinpresents.com/

    http://www.wma.com/sir_george_martin/bio/GEORGE_MARTIN.pdf

    http://web.archive.org/web/20070202161325/http://www.rockhall.com/hof/inductee.asp?id=149

    http://www.grammy.com/photos/ringo-starr-and-george-martin

    http://www.genesis-publications.com/books/playback/

    I could go on Appolo but this is getting boring. I made my point. You will get no further attention from me.

    Bye

    ReplyDelete
  55. Astreajustice said - "This is all connected, Tavistock, New World Order and Codex ALIMENTARIUS.

    Please watch this video. This summarizes everything very well.

    http://www.viddler.com/explore/wauksdachurch/videos/2/"


    >>>> This was an EXCELLENT find! I don't know who you are but you're my hero (under God, my husband and MJ of course, LOL!)

    I can see why it isn't on Youtube.
    --------------------------------------------

    ReplyDelete
  56. http://www.viddler.com/explore/wauksdachurch/videos/2/"

    As the above video link points out, we, humanity are being attacked from every concievable angle. Only our creator can save us. PRAY!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  57. Dear Bonnie,

    Being no top researcher myself, I was again impressed by the invaluable info as well as the other commenters' info in these 5 chapters.

    Neither you or anyone may pretend at all times to hold the Truth 100% on any subject BUT your sources & references are definitely there, as usual, so for the Beatles. Thank you again.

    ReplyDelete
  58. @MissShae - I agree, that is a very good lecture he gave covering how they are doing it.

    I know here there is talk of further legislating farms . . . even those with small gardens if you so much as give food away to your neighbors they want to regulate you as a "food production facility" forcing you to use "patented and genetically altered food"

    http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/food-safety/130175-senate-to-vote-on-food-safety-1099-on-nov-29?page=2

    http://www.govtrack.us/users/questions.xpd?topic=bill:h111-875

    http://blog.friendseat.com/rosa-delauro-hates-small-farms1/

    Control the food supply you control the people . . .

    ReplyDelete
  59. LineCH said - "Neither you or anyone may pretend at all times to hold the Truth 100% on any subject BUT your sources & references are definitely there, as usual, so for the Beatles."


    >>>> Thank you LineCH and no, I don't claim know everything, I am learning with the rest of you and posting what I find.

    One thing that irritant "Apollo" posted that is correct is that the ONE YOUTUBE video posted DID claim the Beatles were the introduction of certain Tavistock-generated terms like Rock and Teenager, rebellion and generation gap. They were not. That began with the advent of "Rock-n-Roll" in the 50's, which the OTHER youtube video covers as well as the OTHER RESOURCES I posted that he obviously did not read.

    ReplyDelete
  60. I was away from the computer for one day and find out all these interesting discussions.

    Bonnie said to Appolo, “I have BLOG with REFERENCES. You accuse me of being historically inaccurate without any references to prove your point.” That is an answer that should be uphold. It is not beneficial and credible for someone to comment having opposing views on the subject without referencing to base the argument. It’s not the person who is at fault referencing everything on the topic of discussion but the other who start argument on the subject of significant as this one without referencing is the one using “A house of false cards that undermines...credibility on anything...”

    Wow!!! Bonnie, I am proud of you in every inch for giving very intelligent answers to Appolo.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Bonnie said, “I know here there is talk of further legislating farms . . . even those with small gardens if you so much as give food away to your neighbors they want to regulate you as a "food production facility" forcing you to use "patented and genetically altered food.” That is so true and so scary what they are trying to do to even to small farmers.

    Long time ago, I stopped buying my foods from chain grocery stores and switched to community grocery stores who buy their foods from local farmers. They (the government) even refused to label our foods if they are GMO (genetically modified foods) so we can make our choice. When you buy your foods from chain grocery stores, you are taking risks maybe your foods are genetically engineered that causes health hazard.

    Sorry for going out of topic. The topic of food what they are going to do and are now doing to it is dear to my heart.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Mesrak said - "It’s not the person who is at fault referencing everything on the topic of discussion but the other who start argument on the subject of significant as this one without referencing is the one using “A house of false cards that undermines...credibility on anything...”

    What "Apollo" doesn't realize is that I know exactly who she is. I think is was probably about six years old when the Beatles "came to town". Special thanks to my computer pal out there. :o)

    ReplyDelete
  63. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Bonnie said ~

    “I know here there is talk of further legislating farms . . . even those with small gardens if you so much as give food away to your neighbors they want to regulate you as a "food production facility" forcing you to use "patented and genetically altered food.”

    Well that is just darn scary! And, I have to wonder how much press that legislation will get. When will people mass together and stand up?!

    After Wilson signed away our money system it was "Control the money, control the people." Now it's come to "control food production, control the people". They certainly are on top of their game!

    Mimi said ~
    "When you buy your foods from chain grocery stores, you are taking risks maybe your foods are genetically engineered that causes health hazard."

    Thanks for the reminder, Mimi!

    We all need to be stocking up on these:

    http://www.non-hybrid-seeds.com/

    Lots of good info. there including growing organic guides.

    "Cross-Pollination
    With the advancement of genetically modified plant varieties, the danger of cross-pollination with organic and non-hybrid varieties is not only possible, it is happening as you read this. If it is possible for GM vegetables, grains and legumes to cross-pollinate with organic and non-hybrid varieties, then it’s possible for the food system to be altered uncontrollably and irreversibly."

    ReplyDelete
  65. @Truthbtold - Thank you for the links! If you start your plants indoors or grow them in a controlled environment (green house), you have a much better chance at keeping your plants natural. We bought a bunch already and they are big on that down here. This is probably how farmers got their "subsidies" . . . they were bought out to accept these seeds, similar to getting "fined" as the U.K. does for not accepting GM beef and meats from the U.S.

    I noticed also in the Jesse Jackson Radio interview I've posted many times, that Michael talks about how he is "in perfect health, actually...." and that he eats "natural foods" mostly, aside from the "10 chicken fingers" Randy Phillips talked about Michael scarfing down in one interview, LOL! But at home . . . healthy foods, and that is what his children got too.

    ReplyDelete
  66. I just want to say a big "thank you" to Astrea for posting the Codex video. It made me cringe when he said "Control the food and you control the people".

    What an eye opener this blog has been.

    ReplyDelete
  67. You're welcome and thank you for the growing tips, Bonnie!

    Sometimes I am just paralyzed with the knowledge of what is going on in front of our noses. But, glad to be aware.

    I know you're really busy Bonnie (probably no idea just how busy!) but still awaiting Light Man info., dying of curiosity!

    ReplyDelete
  68. @Karin - I second that gratitude on the info from Astrea!

    ------------------------------------------

    @Truthbtold - Like I said, you don't want to believe it is real but you thank God that you see it.

    Light man!! Man!!!!!

    I'm sorry!!! I'm writing a note. Tomorrow Morning. I'll dig it up out of files. Sorry!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  69. @ Bonnie ~ Yah, I'm glad I know, trying to be thankful, but it is torture when people don't believe the proof in front of their eyes. Plant the seed is all I can do.

    Light Man...thank you, anxiously awaiting! No problem, I know you are beyond busy. :o)

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.