Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Michael Jackson Princess Diana Shared Common Enemy

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Michael Jackson Princess Diana Shared Common Enemy


Michael Jackson’s Privacy and Princess Diana


“Every child is an artist. The problem is how to remain an artist once we grow up.” - Pablo Picasso


What She knew - Please read this through, for Diana knew who Michael was.  I will place this link also at the bottom of the article so you don't have to scroll up.  "Mouth Of The Dragon".

Michael had a particularly high regard for Princess Diana.  He loved her though, not because she was a princess – that only paved a path for them to meet.  It was because she had a heart of gold and he could feel it.

During several interviews Michael said some things that made me want to take a second look at this relationship, since the press couldn’t seem to decide if Michael and Diana were close friends or if Princess Diana was “just a fan”.

I noticed a Barbara Walters interview where Miss Walters down played the relationship off camera, narrating while Michael  states in the later clip, “I knew her personally.”

As I began watching interviews I began to see some very familiar discrepancies in the press version of what Diana said during interviews.  There was also a pattern of misinformation surrounding her and clues in Princess Diana’s answers as to her recognition of the precarious position she was in.

Michael talked about the patterns in the same stalking and abuse they both suffered, in the song, “Privacy”. 

I want you to take time to listen to every one of these videos because you will see that neither Michael nor Princess Diana believed these “paparazzi” were your ordinary, run-of-the-mill photo seekers.



Privacy

We will go over the lyrics of this song at the bottom of this blog.

Princess Diana Interview with Bashir

A short version of Princess Diana’s interview says a lot, but I am also going to include all parts of the interview.  However, in the “highlights” if you want to call it, Princess Diana talks about the “Establishment” that she’s married into, and how she is considered a “threat” because she wants to “love” people, not cause destruction.

Excerpts of Princess Di and Bashir Interview

Part 1 Princess of Wales
Interview with Martin Bashir


Part 2 – Princess Diana talks about her Depression
And how “they” used it to label her imbalanced
(Just like someone else we love)



Part 3 – She Talks about her discovery
Of Prince Charles Affiar with Camilla and
She “wasn’t in a position to do anything about it”.



Part 4 – Diana talks about a “chess game”
Being played against her.  Sound familiar?



Part 5 – Princess Di talks about
The abusive Press


Now lets view what happened on August 30, 1997.

Press covering Diana’s death in the U.K.

Oddly enough, as news show progresses, Princess Diana was reported as “escaping rather lightly” with a broken arm lacerations to the thigh and a concussion, but as the reporter was speaking, he states he is now getting reports that she was in an “reanimation” portion of the hospital which tells him things were  a bit more serious.

I remembered reports that Diana had died at the scene before they got her to the hospital but that was after news hit the U.S. and I only watched it on one show. We got conflicting reports over here.

The reporter than describes the vehicle escaping Paparazzi on motorcycles (like road rage on a bicycle in Hollywood?) how does one take pictures while operating a motorcycle???  The reporter than says that the Diana’s vehicle hit a wall and was involved with collisions with other vehicles.  However the “debris” being shown as they are cleaning up the scene is only from one car, no others are present.

The way this car is crushed, it looks like it flipped several times.  They also show images of “scooters” believed to be involved in the incident loaded onto police trailers.  However none of these “scooters” are damaged and in such good condition, if Paparazzi were indeed responsible for causing this horrific crash, would they have stuck around to get arrested?  Or did they just leave their scooters and run?

At 6:02 on the above report, the correspondent at the hospital talks about being worried because he says he has reports of the broken arm, the concussion and the lacerations, but there are no statements being released.   Right after the correspondent reports that, the host announces that they just got a report from an “unofficial source” that “The Princess of Wales has died”.  He reports on this with all the compassion of a riding mower. 

Funny thing is . . . Princess Diana was in a Paris hospital, yet the announcement is made on BBC quoting an “unofficial British Source”.  And the correspondent in Paris says, “yes and I have a feeling this is true.”

Well, we know now why they didn’t get the Oscar for their acting jobs!

So?  Did they kill her before or after the actual “unofficial” leak?  And what was the cause of death?  Ready for this?

CARDIAC ARREST! At 8:43 on the video.

Cardiac arrest from a broken arm and a concussion . . . or perhaps Propofol?

Now let’s look at some of the crash photos.

This taken of treating doctor
Notice frame of the back of the car intact


This one is of the vehicle resting against a tunnel wall.
Notice again the frame of the car in the location of the
rear seat and trunk is intact.


Same vehicle?  It looks like someone
Dumped it on it’s roof!




Side View



Now listen to what Michael says about Princess Diana’s death.  He says “I thought I was going to be next . . .”

Why would he think he was going to be next?  Michael had been already almost thirty years at this point dodging paparazzi, since he was a child.  He was an expert dodging them if need be, using everything from dummy limos to impersonators to disguises.  Why would a driver used to  being hounded by the press suddenly feel it necessary to race them through a tunnel?  They obviously couldn’t take their picture while riding at such high speeds, what spooked him?

Perhaps it wasn’t cameras these “photographers on high speed motorcycles” were carrying?

They wouldn’t release information to the family, no autopsy records until they had plenty of time to doctor them.  Fayed’s family could not get any answers.



Michael’s interview with Barbara Walters
talking about Princess Diana’s death.

Now here, oddly enough, Barbara Walters states before Michael talks, that Michael “doesn’t pretend that he and Diana were friends . . . she was a fan”.  But that is not what Michael says.  You don’t fall down crying and get sick to your stomach over a “fan” dying.  Michael said, “I knew her personally”.

In 1999,  Michael talks during an interview over the phone about his “last album” which was Invincible that he was working on at the time.  At 3:15 Michael answers questions about Princess Diana, how they would talk and talk for hours on the phone, how he loved her and her love for people and for children “like I do, like I do”.  So Barbara Walters needs to stop sticking words in people’s mouths.  The were friends whether she likes it or not.

Her work with Children



Michael talks about coaching her over the phone, about rising above it mentally, that they both felt hunted.  He told her to be defiant.  Now why would he need to tell her that?  Be defiant?  Against who?  Just the press?  I don’t think so!



This blog also had the same theory on why photographers were made “the fall guys”, just as “bin Laden” was made the fall guy for “9-11”, and just like the press and media were made the fall guy for Michael’s death, or what lead to his death.

“The "evil photographers" vs. "Bin Laden" and the suicide terrorists - the perfect scapegoat served by illuminati media in the first minutes.  Source

 

“Same patter with these people . . .” huh Michael?




Michael also gets angry about the “U.S.A. for Africa” saying he thought it was “ignorant” that they didn’t want artists from other countries participating, saying he didn’t get into politics and that he thought it was “ignorant”.

He then mentions politics and religion and how they hurt innocent children and called it genocide over political issues and it was wrong (he had been asked about Yugoslavia, which now no longer exists.  (Middle East get ready . . .)  He mentions ethnic cleansing. 

At 7:30 on this video below, he talks about how the British press treats him and makes fun of him and how they say he “ignores the children” in the hospitals.  He then begins to cry and says, “If it weren’t for children I would throw in the towel, I would kill myself.”

Michael in his Battle Gear


On his own Bashir interview in seven years later, Michael talks about hours long phone conversations with Diana.  He does the same on the Schmuley tapes and he also describes Princess Diana as “his type”, because she was so like him.

In the Barbara Walters interview above, Michael says that he prayed that the “next one” wasn’t him.  Now why would he say that?  Why did he be so afraid of being “next” after Princess Diana’s death?  Princess Diana was “on the inside”.  What they must have discussed.  Princess Diana’s talk of an “establishment” that she was married into, and her statement that she was about “loving people” not “destruction”.



Let’s take a look at another version of what happened:


Part 2

Part 3

Now let’s look at Michael’s “Privacy” Lyrics.  I will underline the parts that reference the murder of Princess Diana:

"Privacy"

Ain’t the pictures enough, why do you go through so much
To get the story you need,
so you can bury me
You’ve got the people confused, you tell the stories you choose
You try to get me to lose the man I really am

You keep on stalking me, invading my privacy
won’t you just let me be
‘cause you cameras can’t control, the minds of those who know
That you’ll even sell your soul just to get a story sold

[CHORUS]
I need my privacy, I need my privacy
So paparazzi, get away from me

Some of you still wonder why, one of my friends had to die
To get a message across, that yet you haven’t heard
My friend was chased and confused, like many others I knew

But on that cold winter night, my pride was snatched away

Now she get no second chance, she just ridiculed and harassed
Please tell my why
No there’s a lesson to learn, respect’s not given, it’s earned
Stop maliciously attacking my integrity

[CHORUS]

Now there’s a lesson to learn, stories are twisted and turned
Stop maliciously attacking my integrity


In the first stanza of the first verse, Michael sings about them getting “the story you need so you can bury me.”  I no longer think this is just a metaphor for being buried in lies.  Because he tells of them trying to “get me to lose the man I really am.”  This is not about the paparazzi trying to confuse Michael as to who he is, this sounds more like something/someone a bit more sinister than every day photographers, was we saw in the investigation just above us.

In the red, first stanza of the second verse, Michael sings, “Some of you still wonder why one of my friends had to die, to get a message across that yet you haven’t heard.”  This leads me to believe that Michael knew the death of Princess Diana was no accident – to get a message across that yet you haven’t heard.  Michael was or had been trying to tell us what was in the planning, that we hadn’t “gotten” yet.

He sings “My friend was dazed (chased) and confused like many others I knew…”  Same pattern with these people – Michael Jackson to Jesse Jackson in 2005.  Other people were killed to keep the “lesson” from being “learned” that stories are twisted and turned.  Michael’s integrity was attacked, Princess Diana’s integrity was attacked.

I left out the last line in the second verse, “But on that cold winter night my pride was snatched away”.  I left it out because this is not in reference to Diana, this is about something else.  Princess Diana was killed in August.  That line is in reference to something specifically that happened to Michael and he placed it there, sandwiched between his story of Diana for a reason.

I want you to listen to another song of Michael’s, “Invincible” with the lyrics:

Invincible

This is again about the music industry and Michael’s “girl” his career/label in which he believed he was ‘married’ to.  He looked at this as being “one” with his music.

Now look at the lyrics in the beginning:

“If I could tear down these walls that keep you and I apart
I know I could claim your heart and our perfect love will start
But girl you just won’t approve of the things that I do
When all I do is for you but still you say it ain’t cool”

Michael’s “girl” doesn’t approve of the things Michael does, even though all he does is for “her”.  He wants to change the industry, the music and how it is being used.  He sings of his struggle to get his “girl” to understand that this will be good for her.

The other verses are more of the same, trying to win “her” over to his side, his “way of thinking”, taking the music/his girl to places they’ve never been before. 

Several of his songs on “Invincible” relate to his struggle with getting them to give in to him on where he wants to take the music, which was to build up people, inspire them and make a positive impact. 

Back to Diana and the very same pattern of abuse that was inflicted upon Michael was also inflicted upon Diana.  Princess Diana was also loved all over the world, respected and much like Michael, was heavily involved in trying to better people’s lives and was especially drawn to the plight of children.

Michael and Princess Di had a lot in common



Negative Press and Michael

Children and Michael’s past – Martin Bashir
Statements jumping off balconey if no children existed
You haven’t been where I’ve been - @4:22


Michael has talked about thoughts of suicide when he was a child, above he’s talked about jumping off a balcony if there were no children left in the world.  These are pretty extreme feelings for someone if we are to be convinced that Michael’s only issue with a lost childhood had to do with a strict father and a life on stage.  Michael felt he could trust no adults.  None.  He felt safer around children.  Why?

He and Princess Diana shared a lot of conversation.  The establishment was after both of them.  It is not hard to put two and two together on this, those videos of “what really happened” practically do that for us.

Princess Diana, after leaving the Kensington Palace life and Prince Charles, was also maligned by the establishment press, stalked, followed, taped, surveillance and threatened. 

Michael loved Princess Diana and the person she was.  He once called her his “Ideal girl”.

I will give you guys two days to read over and watch these videos, I know there is a lot lately and I’m sorry, but you need to see the information connected, so please take the time to view the videos because they back up the information we are finding.

I wish, wish, wish I knew more about what was going on back then.  No wonder Michael felt so alone.  Can you imagine knowing people are after you to bring you down, watching it happen to another innocent friend who also wanted to change the world, and not be able to tell the world because a thug has your sister and your family has been infiltrated?   There was no safe place.

God kept a protective cocoon around Michael, but that cocoon had walls he could see through and the threat was always there.

The quality of innocence is the most rare
and most sought after commodity in which
it’s very condition is compromised
upon ownership.  Bonnie Cox © 2011


Michael We are so Sorry :o(


We loved her too and knew she was a good person


Please See "Mouth Of The Dragon"



44 comments:

  1. Bonnie,
    Princess Diana's death was always suspicious, in my opinion. In the same way that Michael's was - a whole bunch of stories with holes so big you could drive a truck through. A lot of people lying - to cover up what? It wasn't just about the scooters Bonnie, there was a mysterious white Fiat car, whose owner vanished. The surviving occupants of the Mercedes car are too scared to tell the truth. Why?
    The word on the street is that once Diana was 'free' from the establishment, and starting to take interest in landmine campaigns etc., she was a 'loose cannon ball'. As with Michael, stories about her bumped world leaders from the front pages, and she was seen as meddling in areas she had no right to.
    Power and Money. Those are the things at the root of all this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Bonnie, now you made ​​me go back to August 31, 1997. I remember that terrible day, I cried so much for the death of Diana. I was very sad.

    Recently I saw the movie "The Queen ". I do not know if you saw this movie, but it speaks of the death of Princess Diana.
    The British people are stricken by the death of the "People's Princess".
    While the royal family seems indifferent. Fortunately, Tony Blair speaks to Queen Elizabeth.......

    Bonnie said:"God kept a protective cocoon around Michael, but that cocoon had walls he could see through and the threat was always there."
    These words are very wise!
    Unfortunately, being evil know how to infiltrate everywhere.

    A final farewell with the hope that you, Bonnie, could walk better.
    God bless you.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Princess Glam said - "Princess Diana's death was always suspicious, in my opinion. In the same way that Michael's was - a whole bunch of stories with holes so big you could drive a truck through. A lot of people lying - to cover up what? It wasn't just about the scooters Bonnie, there was a mysterious white Fiat car, whose owner vanished."

    >>>>>>> I know a lot of people felt this too, but it was never talked about and I wanted to cover it. I did not go into detail about the white Fiat because the video did a much better job and I had no other info on it.

    I got more information watching the way Princess Diana answered those questions from Bashir and the way she referred to "The Establishment" and not just "The Monarchy". And she is the same as Michael in the sense that she is very smart as a whip but had this aura of innocence about her.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Skiper said - ""The Queen ". I do not know if you saw this movie, but it speaks of the death of Princess Diana.
    The British people are stricken by the death of the "People's Princess".
    While the royal family seems indifferent. Fortunately, Tony Blair speaks to Queen Elizabeth......."

    >>>>>>>>>> No, I did not see this movie, but you describe the "indifference" of the royals accurately and I think it's in their DNA. On my mother's side, my grandfather's family is from Nobility and probably the most prevelent memories of my great grandfather (he didn't pass away until I was 12), was this constant "we're above this" air about them. They don't cry, they don't get visibly upset, their aloof and you just want to grab them, shake them and WAKE THEM UP!!! They don't talk about anything with each other, there is no heart-warming talks, it's a fake existence.

    Nobody says, "I love you." or "I care about you" and you tow the line and actions speak louder than words but you know . . . sometimes you really just want to hear the words! Children are "seen and not heard" "Don't speak unless spoken to first" and children are pretty much trophies of the parent's accomplishments, you get SICK OF IT! Where is the heart???

    I would love it if Queen Elizabeth would come out of her coma. I wish God would touch her heart and open it up and she could just have a good cry about EVERYTHING she has advocated in her lifetime.

    Skiper thank you for your words. Are you leaving for good or just taking a short break from commenting?

    ReplyDelete
  5. @BONNIE : For Michael I did cry & still do but for Princess Diana I did too, I remember her death was a shock & a loss to me also. Princess Diana & Michael had in common an infinite grace & a true concern for the suffering humanity.

    Frankly, which decent & wise man would prefer a Camilla Parker-Bowles (older, jealous, not even beautiful, naughty, perverse & dishonest) to such a young, beautiful, gentle & gracious woman like Lady Diana, the class in person, who also truly loved Prince Charles in the early days of their marriage ? I also believe in a conspiration against Lady Diana leading to her death, first organized at the roots by the Royal Family assisted by the Secret Services & the UK Government. Yes, there was jealousy & fear that Diana with her bright aura not only was preferred in the public's heart to the Royal Family but also wanted to improve things like charity & compassion, unknown to the UK Royals. Prince Charles should have been proud & honored instead with such a wonderful wife. Michael & Diana, two gentle souls, Lights in the world, murdered by we know who they are.

    Prince Charles & his Royal parents (except his 2 sons of course) may go back to where they belong .. Hell, instead of still parading in the world jet-set. Same for those who attacked Michael. Thinking of it, I am angry, sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bonnie –thank you so much for this post. I love Lady Diana. My heart still broken from her death. She was a true inspiration.

    That is so true when you said “Michael had a particularly high regard for Princess Diana.” At one time when she went to see his show in London, she asked him if he was going to sing “Dirty Diana.” He said to her, he wasn’t going to sing that song in respect of her, and she was so disappointed and said to him that she particularly came to the show to hear that song. Even though the song has nothing to do with her, he took it out just because of the song’s title. What a gentleman.

    Her boyfriend’s father tried so hard investing so much money to find out whatever happened to her and to his son, but no luck. That’s what happened when big money and power involved. No amount of investigations would help any case. They cover it up with cash for the truth to be buried forever. Good examples are, President John F. Kennedy’s and Martin Luther King’s murder are few of them.

    Do you remember the news were saying for so long that the driver was intoxicated with alcohol and that’s why he crashed. Do you buy that? I don’t.

    Good job Bonnie for telling it like it is, “So Barbara Walters needs to stop sticking words in people’s mouths. They were friends whether she likes it or not.”

    I will watch every video you posted since I am very much interested in Lady D and the similarity of Michael and her life.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Bonnie! Very revealing blog! As usual, I'm learning so much. Princess Diana and Michael have so much in common (Even Bashir!)Princess Di was as caring, loving, humane and intelligent as Michael. Their missions= Spreading LOVE to everyone in the world! Something that this world has been so deficient of for a very long time.
    Two of the strongest people I have ever learnt about. God richly bless them! Princess Diana's death was so tragic. Gone to soon. The good ones die too soon. May His Will be done.
    Thank you, Bonnie! God bless you and your family! Hope that foot has gotten much better! The last blog left me very sad. The movie you described struck me deeply. I wonder if I'd be able to watch it. So sad that things haven't changed much in the world.

    Hugs!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. What do you think of this?

    http://www.letitflow.com/michael-jackson-statue-unveiled-at-fulham-fc-football-stadium/

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/apr/01/fulham-michael-jackson-statue-fans

    ReplyDelete
  9. LineCH said - "Frankly, which decent & wise man would prefer a Camilla Parker-Bowles (older, jealous, not even beautiful, naughty, perverse & dishonest) to such a young, beautiful, gentle & gracious woman like Lady Diana, the class in person, who also truly loved Prince Charles in the early days of their marriage ?"

    >>>>>> Well, truthfully I don't know much about Camilla, so I can't determine if she was perverse or not, but she did have an affair with Charles while he was still married to PRINCESS Diana, so dishonest would be an accurate statement. Would it be too much of a stretch to surmise that Charles and Camilla planned the affair specifically to drive Princess Diana out when they learned she was not on board with their affiliations with certain bankers and their plans? So possibly began the plan to drive her away, isolate her, spread the rumors about her depression or at least make them worse than it was, then in steps sleezy documentary "wolf in sheeps clothing" Bashir with his demoralizing, flagship interview and two years later, she's gone.

    I wish Michael had seen that interview of hers before he agreed to Bashir's lie-u-mentory.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Mimi said - "Her boyfriend’s father tried so hard investing so much money to find out whatever happened to her and to his son, but no luck. That’s what happened when big money and power involved. No amount of investigations would help any case. "

    >>>>>>>> Yes, I know. They talk about that in those "What really happened" videos above, and they also talk about the lie concerning the driver and his drug/alcohol usage" they cover the lack of availability the families of those that died had to the autopsy reports and their own investigations into what caused the crash. Very interesting.
    --------------------------------------------

    Nana said - "The last blog left me very sad. The movie you described struck me deeply. I wonder if I'd be able to watch it. So sad that things haven't changed much in the world."

    This is the trailer for the movie, it gives you a shortcut of what is in it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGeMGxWIoJ8&feature=related

    This is the ending scene: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBkxpcIgmvM

    Nana said - "What do you think of this?

    http://www.letitflow.com/michael-jackson-statue-unveiled-at-fulham-fc-football-stadium/

    >>>>>>>> I commend Mohammed Fayed for wanting to honor Michael AND for selling Harrod's store. But the statue looks more like James DeBarge then Michael. (shrugs)

    ReplyDelete
  11. @Nana - I also want to say that I RESPECT Mr. Fayed's comment about people can "Go to H*ll" if they don't like it." Mr. Fayed has first hand knowlege of the "people" that tormented Michael and I LOVE HIM for speaking out. I like the THOUGHT, I just don't think the Statue looks much like Michael. I know what Mr. Fayed lost and I understand his anger.

    {{{Mohammed Fayed}}}

    ReplyDelete
  12. @Nana - Okay, I take back what I said about the statue, if you look at it from the front, it's much better. From the side . . . James DeBarge.

    I think Mr. Fayed should KEEP IT THERE!!! And the FOOTBALL fans need to take a moment and realize that there is a message here -

    GET TO KNOW THE MAN! He symbolizes endurance, a "never give up" attitude, won't cave to his opponents and has a fighting spirit. Not to mention that this is a good time to start dismantling the walls between people. (Fayed, feel free to use this if you want!!! Don't give in!!!)

    From the front, the statue is kinda cute. Not exactly Michael, but we know who it's supposed to be . . . still cute. http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/apr/03/mohamed-al-fayed-michael-jackson-statue

    ReplyDelete
  13. BONNIE : On the contrary, "perverse" is a completely accurate statement for Camilla who renewed her "romantic" relationship with Charles in the early 80s (wasn't he freshly married to Diana by then?) & contributed largely to destroy Diana's marriage with Charles, as per Diana's own statement. And BTW isn't he married now to Camilla who if Queen Elizabeth dies may become the new "Queen" ? In the early 80s Camilla was already married & should have withdrawn from her relationship with Charles in particular when he was newly married with Diana & was herself married.

    Charles & his Camilla did not have only a one time "accidental affair" but pursued regularly after Charles married, with the blessing of the Royal family, to still ridiculize & vilify Diana : the press scandal did not stop them, on the contrary. Diana was chosen only to sire heirs for the Royalty but wasn't loved by Charles & despised by his family. Terrible tragedy for a young & gentle woman like Diana who met the wrong people so early.

    Good night !

    ReplyDelete
  14. That 'family' didn't deserve Diana and she sure didn't deserve the mess she married into.

    A bit of Camilla trivia...

    She is the great-granddaughter of Alice Keppel - famous mistress of King Edward VII:

    "Even early on, Alice Keppel had a reputation for adultery...Keppel quickly climbed the social ladder through affairs with prominent men of the day."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_Keppel

    Affairs are a royal family tradition.

    Maybe they know they can trust Camilla since her family has an intimate history with them. I simply can't imagine why any man would choose her over Diana!

    There's something I don't understand. I thought Charles was ineligible for the throne and William was next in line. Now the press is saying Charles is heir to the throne again. Does that mean Camilla will automatically be queen? (Eeek!) Did William get 'bumped' when Diana fell out of favor with the royals?

    I would really appreciate if someone would explain that to me.

    Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  15. LineCH said - "On the contrary, "perverse" is a completely accurate statement for Camilla who renewed her "romantic" relationship with Charles in the early 80s (wasn't he freshly married to Diana by then?) & contributed largely to destroy Diana's marriage with Charles, as per Diana's own statement."

    >>>>>>> I don't know much about this story as the information on Diana and the above interview is the first time I had ever seen it. You saying that Princess Diana was "chosen" to bear heirs, I wonder why Camilla couldn't do this? I don't disagree that could be a possible reason Charles chose Diana, but I don't understand why not Camilla in the first place? Could Diana have been chosen in the same way Michael was chosen??? For different qualities of course, by the establishment. Michael for his intelligence, inner strength and talent, Diana for her looks and discipline? (just for an example).

    I saw a picture of Michael once where he was much younger, probably about 21 or so, and he was dressed in a green sweater I think. I've posted the pic somewhere. He's viewed from the side, just right off profile, and he's staring strait ahead. You can see a hint of a mustache and the way the light hits his eyes, you can just see into them. It's a very striking picture and the eyes just grab you and hold you. You can't stop looking at them. If you look at some of his early 70's picture, he has the same look in his eyes, even as a child.

    If you look at Diana, she doesn't have this look in her eyes but more of a soft, guarded look. She has very soft eyes as well.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Truthbtold said - "There's something I don't understand. I thought Charles was ineligible for the throne and William was next in line. Now the press is saying Charles is heir to the throne again. Does that mean Camilla will automatically be queen? (Eeek!) Did William get 'bumped' when Diana fell out of favor with the royals?"

    >>>>>> Why would Charles be ineligible for the throne? I thought he was being passed over (for some unknown reason) for William, then you telling me THIS is something new.

    I read somewhere that Prince William refused the "mark of the beast" and I didn't save the link. It was my hope that Diana's children would pull away from the establishment and do some digging into their mother's death.

    Did you notice that neither child looks like Charles? Prince William looks like his mother and Harry has red hair and looks like, well, someone else. I dare not speculate, but I have had my thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Bonnie commented on Skiper:
    "Are you leaving for good or just taking a short break from commenting?"
    This sentence I sent (in London) to translate it to my son, cause I did not understand.
    Bonnie, you know that I have difficulty to understand your language but I'm stubborn and I continue to study English.
    Therefore, you have patience with me as I write. Sometime, I can be misunderstood. I'm sorry.
    Bonnie, you know how much I love Michael. You talk about him constantly and I appreciate you for that.
    That's 'cause I'll try always write to you.

    Now I want to report this message: "Slaughter in the boat in Lampedusa, sinks barge: dozens of corpses, including children. "
    When I read, I was wrong. They are innocent. The population of the Middle East, is seeking refuge in Italy. The British press does not write anything about these poor people.
    I pray every night for them.

    I love you Bonnie.

    ReplyDelete
  18. BONNIE : "I don't disagree that could be a possible reason Charles chose Diana, but I don't understand why not Camilla in the first place?"

    All I recall from the past having once followed much on Diana & Charles story is that he & the UK Royals wanted a young bride from very good aristocratic family (Diana was through her father, Lord Spencer, with royal ancestry Duke of Malborough), representative & with impeccable manners so Diana was too. Physical beauty is a Gift of God but not the most important. Only if one looks at the face expression between Diana & Camilla, Diana is definitely advantaged for her inner beauty in spite of her natural reserve. When Diana learnt about Charles & Camilla's ongoing affair shortly & long after her own marriage, she fooled around too with not the best choices. But Diana was actually born to be a good wife/mother & a great Queen giving a fresh wind to the dusty & corrupt UK Monarchy if Charles had been a decent & loving man to her.

    Diana & Michael were both respectively ill-fated by corruption, jealousy & power greed around them & badly never found each their soul mates. Maybe yes for Diana with Dodi Al Fayed ? Anyhow Mr. Mohammed Al Fayed has all my sympathy for the loss of his son & his recognition of Diana & Michael as great people.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Bonnie,
    The reason that Charles did not marry Camilla is that Camilla had a 'past' i.e. she had had lovers. Diana was a virgin. Pressure was put on Charles to chooses a 'pure' bride. In the aristocracy it is considered OK to have lovers, as long as you are discreet about it. Wives can have lovers AFTER they have produced an heir and a spare. Personally, I could never accept that arrangement and I think Diana felt the same.
    As for accession to the throne, the only blot on Charles' copybook that I am aware of was a divorce, but as Diana is no longer here, that barrier was also nicely tidied away. How convenient.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Bonnie said:
    "Why would Charles be ineligible for the throne? I thought he was being passed over (for some unknown reason) for William, then you telling me THIS is something new."

    I don't know. But I do remember it being reported that William was next in line. That is no longer what is being reported.

    I may have found an answer, it's about the rules of The Church of England:

    "Church of England bishops sent out rules which bar adulterers whose infidelity wrecked their first marriage."

    "The death of Princess Diana in 1997 means that Prince Charles is not himself barred from remarriage."

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-159665/Rules-adultery-dash-Charless-hopes-marriage.html

    This is probably why Charles & Camilla married in a civil ceremony rather than in the church. Ultimately though, it seems that "heir to the throne" is up to the queen or present ruling monarch.

    Ascension to the throne:

    http://askville.amazon.com/Prince-William-king-Charles/AnswerViewer.do?requestId=26122919

    "There for a while there was some doubt about his succession when he married his second wife because she, even though she had a legal divorce, still had a living husband. ... Since as the monarch of England Charles would also be the head of the Anglican Church there was a considerable possibility that the Anglicans would refuse to recognize him as King and by a statute of English law they could block his coronation on moral grounds. Some how or another though the Queen worked it all out so that the church was happy and Charles could be King. "

    http://askville.amazon.com/Prince-Charles-UK-King-son-line-future-king/AnswerViewer.do?requestId=403880

    "The Sovereign holds the title 'Defender of the Faith and Supreme Governor of the Church of England'."

    http://www.royal.gov.uk/MonarchUK/QueenandChurch/QueenandtheChurchofEngland.aspx

    I would like to read about William refusing the "mark of the beast". I've read a lot recently about people's negative speculation about William - numbers and the unusual celestial positions at his birth.

    I too hoped Diana's boys would pull away and look into their mother's death. Maybe they have but THAT is not likely to be reported. They're still young, sometimes that need to dig doesn't happen until later in life. Surely their environment since Diana died has played a big part - she can no longer protect them.

    Yes, I too notice that neither boy looks like Charles. I'll speculate on Harry, many have already:

    "According to the source Prince Philip threatened Hewitt's life if he didn't go along with the coverup."

    "Under HYPNOSIS (!!!) for a tv interview Hewitt admitted he met Diana in 1981 or 1982..."

    http://www.matrixofevil.com/matrix_of_evil_2_018.htm#Princess%20Dianna2

    ReplyDelete
  21. I forgot to say...

    That first photo of Michael and Diana is delightful...oh the joy! What a powerful team they would have been.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Skiper said - ""Slaughter in the boat in Lampedusa, sinks barge: dozens of corpses, including children. "
    When I read, I was wrong. They are innocent. The population of the Middle East, is seeking refuge in Italy."

    >>>>> Thank you for letting us know this. See? This isn't something the people in the Middle East want! This is what the U.S. and the brainwashed radicals want! Do the radicals even know they are setting the demise of their own sovereignty? This really makes me angry!!!

    And Skiper, thank you for the explanation on the translating. I'm glad your not leaving for good :o)
    ---------------------------------------------

    LineCH said - "UK Royals wanted a young bride from very good aristocratic family (Diana was through her father, Lord Spencer, with royal ancestry Duke of Malborough), representative & with impeccable manners so Diana was too."

    >>>>>>>> I remember her background, but Camilla royal ties also. I remember in one of the parts of the Bashir interview above, Diana was asked if she thought she would ever be queen and she replied, "No." That's what is so chilling. She knew they would never let her be queen. And I don't even know that Diana did fool around. She also explained during that same interview that there were men who were good friends that she was talking to alot and that were helping her through this, and they were reported in the papers as being her illicit lovers, which she said never happened. At least not with the ones they were referring to.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Bonnie said:

    "And I don't even know that Diana did fool around."

    Well, I wouldn't put it that way but at the end of Part 4 of Bashir's interview with Diana when asked if she was unfaithful regarding James Hewitt she says "Yes, I adored him, yes I was in love with him. But I was very let down." Let down after Hewitt published a tell-all book that Diana previously (at 8:10ish) describes: "Yes, there was factual evidence in the book but a lot of it comes from another world. It didn't equate to what happened. There was a lot of fantasy in that book. It was very distressing for me that a friend who I had trusted made money out of me."

    This, coupled with evidence from my last comment leads me to believe "the family" was likely at some point in control of Hewitt - another tool to bring Diana down.

    ReplyDelete
  24. The Royals are well know for not letting their children marry who they want to.
    princess Diana was not Charles's first choice it was Camilla but seeing as she was engaged at the time,Diana was brought forward as good breeding stock.
    Diana became more popular than Charles by far she overshadowed him on Royal tours etc.Hence the need to get rid of her.my grandfather was a coldstream guard the ones that stand a buckingham Palace with the bear skin hats he said you would not believe the comings and goings that went on.

    ReplyDelete
  25. BONNIE : "remember her background, but Camilla royal ties also"
    Camilla's mother only as daughter of a baron, not to compare with Diana's background although Diana's character & personality really matter. The British folk & the world loved Diana & cried for her, not the Royals.

    Thanks to Princess, Truth & Dizzy for helping further on the Royals & Camilla because both subjects irritate me & I've had enough. Alike for Michael, I am a Diana's defender since in a way she paid prematurely with her life for the corruption & jealousy of the Royals.

    Bonnie, how would any young loving woman freshly married react by realizing that her husband prefers a former mistress to her & maintain that mistress as a regular ? None. Diana made maybe bad choices with some lovers thereafter but I can understand her. At her age, I would have been devastated & lost too.

    Again, R.I.P Diana, Princess of the Hearts, also hoping that William & Kate - nice couple - will have a happier destiny & soon a legitimate access to the Throne... if they are let.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Bonnie,
    The other speculation as to why Diana was chosen, also fits in with our fears over the manipulation of Michael. Diana was chosen because she was young, a bit naive, shy and could be easily molded.
    Wow, whoever came up with that assessment got it seriously wrong!

    ReplyDelete
  27. I remember when Diana died, I sat on the end of my bed in front of the TV for two days, and cried. My family ask why I was so upset and I couldn't explain. I felt like everything good and right in the world was being taken away. Like Michael said, who is next? I was devistated. I mean just like Michael she was a threat because of her Love and Kindness and the influence she had on the world, and the people that Loved her. It was so appearant that someone or group wanted her gone. And like Murray they wanted to blame it on the driver. The fall guy...this world wreaks of evil and deceipt. And people can't see that what is going on with natural disasters or maybe not so natural...maybe man made and the polical unrest in the middle east is the beginning of the End of this corruption by the hand of God. He is ready to put an end to Satans rule on this earth and the attacks on his people. I am sorry to rant, but all this just gets me right in the heart...Love you Bonnie..and thank you for every second that you spend bringing awareness for Michael....At times I too feel gutted...

    ReplyDelete
  28. Truthbtold said - "Yes, I too notice that neither boy looks like Charles. I'll speculate on Harry, many have already:"

    Wow, that's a lot of information, truth! Thank you for looking all that up. So is William still in line for King? He should be right, if Charles is still the adulterer? Hewitt - I agree with you 100%.
    -----------------------------------------

    dizzydi said - "Charles by far she overshadowed him on Royal tours etc.Hence the need to get rid of her.my grandfather was a coldstream guard the ones that stand a buckingham Palace with the bear skin hats he said you would not believe the comings and goings that went on."

    >>>>> I remember all that talk about Princess's popularity and appeal. She was just a good person. What a nightmare that turned into for her. I really believe she was killed in the hospital and not from her injuries.
    ---------------------------------------------

    LineCh said - "Again, R.I.P Diana, Princess of the Hearts, also hoping that William & Kate - nice couple - will have a happier destiny & soon a legitimate access to the Throne... if they are let."

    >>>> I am hoping no such thing will exist when it becomes time for someone else to take over. I would never wish being a part of that "establishment" on anyone . . . sell your soul to the devil for that? No.
    ------------------------------------------

    PrincessGlam said - "Diana was chosen because she was young, a bit naive, shy and could be easily molded."

    I bet that played a strong part in it. I agree.
    -----------------------------------------------

    Victoria said - "My family ask why I was so upset and I couldn't explain. I felt like everything good and right in the world was being taken away. Like Michael said, who is next? I was devistated."

    >>>>>>>>>> I was just in shock. I couldn't believe it It was like watching Swan Lake - the morbid version. I was about 32 or 33 when she died. That was a horrendously busy time for me. I had a business and young boys in sports, but I remember just that black ball in the pit of the stomach feeling. Where was Michael then? I can't remember if he had Prince by that time or not. 1997, right? In August, prince was about six months old, so that could not have been easy for Michael to deal with and still be "dad". :o(((

    ReplyDelete
  29. You're welcome, LineCH & Bonnie.

    We all cried at the same time when Diana died and we thought Michael died. God heard and knows our hearts.

    dizzydi15 said:
    "The Royals are well know for not letting their children marry who they want to."

    Diana's words to William in Part 4 of Bashir interview: "If you find someone you love in life, you must hang onto it and look after it. If you are lucky enough to find someone who loves you, you must protect it."

    I deeply hope Catherine Middleton is William's choice. With her basically being a "commoner", I don't understand why there doesn't seem to have been any royal interference.

    I hope all the best for Diana's deep-thinking son and his soon-to-be wife Kate. The wedding day will be a British national holiday. A lot of people will be in one accord all over the world, wishing them well with remembrance of Diana in the front of their minds.

    William is next in line to the throne after Charles. Although I believe he would bring the monarchy closer to the people's level, be the people's king and a stronger and more righteous leader than his father, I too do not wish that upon him.

    I read that one of the first things William would do as king is re-instate Diana's title - Her Royal Highness. I have to wonder with all they put her through and all she knew, if she would truly want that. On the other hand, she would probably be flattered by her son's loving gesture and graciously accept.

    We love and miss you Diana, Queen of Hearts. :'o(

    ReplyDelete
  30. BONNIE : "I would never wish being a part of that "establishment" on anyone . . . sell your soul to the devil for that? No."

    Who said "sell your soul to the devil for that?" YOU Bonnie, not I. Please do not twist my comments.

    William & Kate seem to me good young people & would be better fit to bring a fresh wind & do some cleaning in the present Monarchy : if they can achieve that without compromising their soul or life, good. In case however they are not chosen & thus spare their peace & life & avoid the pain Diana suffered, then BE IT. But it means the evil could continue undisturbed too with his destruction within the royal circles.

    Prince William by birth is part of that establishment. Just that the old establishment is still strongly in place so one may not measure William's real -good or not- capacities.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Bonnie, I recently watched the movie “Lady Jane” .. have you seen it? I quite enjoyed it, you may like to add it to your list for the next time you put your feet up. She was also known as The Nine Days' Queen. An English noblewoman who occupied the English throne from 10 July until 19 July 1553 until they took her head off. I wonder how history may have been changed had she had the chance to rule.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Jane_Grey

    (sorry for posting late to this blog ♥)

    ReplyDelete
  32. Hi everyone. I have company tonight so I will be back on some time tomorrow to answer all the posts here and on the Diana post. Love to all of you and God Bless you♥

    ReplyDelete
  33. Truthbtold said - "I deeply hope Catherine Middleton is William's choice. With her basically being a "commoner", I don't understand why there doesn't seem to have been any royal interference."

    >>>>>> That is one beautiful girl! Prince William looks like he has a good head on his shoulders and I'm hoping he has his mother's character. His eyes say he does. I hope God surrounds him with protection.
    ------------------------------------------
    Line CH said - "Who said "sell your soul to the devil for that?" YOU Bonnie, not I. Please do not twist my comments."

    >>>>>>>> Ummmm Line? Could you do me a favor and go back and re-read my comment. I never accused you of saying that. That was just me voicing my hope that William has not done that. I in no way twisted any comment of yours, I only commented with my feelings. Could you try and re-read it? There was no malice whatsoever in what I said.
    ---------------------------------------

    Cathy said - "Bonnie, I recently watched the movie “Lady Jane” .. have you seen it? I quite enjoyed it, you may like to add it to your list for the next time you put your feet up. She was also known as The Nine Days' Queen."

    >>>>> Hi Cathy! No, I have not seen the movie. I don't watch a lot of T.V. If they have it in DVD I may get it though, and I can always do some reading up on her. No problem on the timing of the comment. Anytime. I just approved a comment to a blog post from two months ago, so you are fine! ♥♥♥

    ReplyDelete
  34. BONNIE : "Could you try and re-read it? There was no malice whatsoever in what I said."

    Thank you VM, Bonnie, for your patient reply. OK I misunderstood, not the 1st time anyway :o( Do I become an old "touchy" one ? :o)

    The Diana's Blog this week, I admit, woke up my "agressive" energies directed to the UK Royals in my comments, recalling their coldness, lack of empathy & the conspiracy against Diana. It is all far away but alike for Michael, same pattern : both very good people suffering bad injustice leading to their elimination, so we may today still be revolted against their enemies' acts. But whatever such enemies "achieved", Michael & Diana will always be loved & remembered dearly.

    So Bonnie, I am what I am, Hmmm.., but please know : I DO love & respect You & Your Blog entirely... just I love watching Michael or cute babies :o) but the reality of the Illuminati & other torturers, sometimes...Grrr.

    God Bless You & Family. Nice Week-End.

    ReplyDelete
  35. LineCH - "Thank you VM, Bonnie, for your patient reply. OK I misunderstood, not the 1st time anyway :o( Do I become an old "touchy" one ? :o)"


    >>>>>>> Please do not worry. I have been there many times on this blog and I did understand where the emotion was coming from. The reality of what is going on vs. the more pleasing, innocent time of Michael holding babies is one of those doors I did not want to open either.

    The day I first embarked on this part of the journey, and found out our own government was behind 9-11 . . . and other things, I spent most of the day having to get up from my computer, crying, praying. So please know I understand . . . with love ♥♥♥ God bless you.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Hi Bonnie! Sorry for not replying earlier. It's been a busy week.

    Bonnie said:I also want to say that I RESPECT Mr. Fayed's comment about people can "Go to H*ll" if they don't like it." Mr. Fayed has first hand knowlege of the "people" that tormented Michael and I LOVE HIM for speaking out. I like the THOUGHT, I just don't think the Statue looks much like Michael. I know what Mr. Fayed lost and I understand his anger.


    >>>> I agree with you 100%. I can only imagine how his loss has affected him over the years. The haters 'And the FOOTBALL fans need to take a moment and realize that there is a message here -

    GET TO KNOW THE MAN! He symbolizes endurance, a "never give up" attitude, won't cave to his opponents and has a fighting spirit'.

    I truly admire what Mr. Fayed is doing.I pray he stays strong and keeps it there. I know it's going to be hard for him because the British press are going to hound him for this. I don't even know which is worse- The American Press or The British Press!

    You're right. From the side, the statue really does look more like James Debarge than Michael! It's adorable, too.

    Boy, I'm learning so much from this blog post and the comments.

    Thanks again, Bonnie.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Bonnie said:This is the trailer for the movie, it gives you a shortcut of what is in it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGeMGxWIoJ8&feature=related

    This is the ending scene: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBkxpcIgmvM

    >>>> Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  38. BONNIE : "The day I first embarked on this part of the journey, and found out our own government was behind 9-11"

    9/11 : I feel for you. It's again too much. One can lose his faith with such truths.

    But life is short : we may lose our temper, but never our sense of humour: a crutch only but guarding us from insanity at times. To-morrow, I'll have a question for you on D. Wiesner from my readng today your last 2 Blogs.

    I don't even know how to produce technically by commenting the small "heart" emoticons or how to transfer them on my comments, do you imagine? but my heart is with your Blog.
    Good Night!

    ReplyDelete
  39. @Nana - You're welcome Nana and thank you for the words of support. Mohammed Fayed knows what is going on. I support him and his statue.
    ----------------------------------------------

    LineCH said - "But life is short : we may lose our temper, but never our sense of humour: a crutch only but guarding us from insanity at times. To-morrow, I'll have a question for you on D. Wiesner from my readng today your last 2 Blogs."

    >>>>> On 9-11, it broke my heart like you wouldn't believe, learning my country's crimes, but I am glad I know and my eyes are now opened. Still, I had my head on the desk crying to God when I learned, just begging him that it wasn't true, asking him to show me something else. I could almost feel him patting my head. I agree with you on humor guarding us from insanity.

    Let me know what I can answer on Dieter Wiesner, if I know.

    The small hearts. You hold the "alt" button down while pressing the "3" on the numeric pad and it creates the heart.

    "alt" and other numbers make other symbols as well.

    "alt" + "13" = ♪
    "alt" + "14" = ♫
    "alt" + "3" = ♥

    Now go play, LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  40. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  41. @ BONNIE
    ♥ found it ! a kid would be smarter anyway. The Alt is OK but "3" I had to type it from the small keyboard on the right of computer not "3" from big keyboard, Goofy me !

    Bonnie for you now plenty of ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ !

    ReplyDelete
  42. Hey, I didn't read all the comments above but what you said about the S Class' frame can be explained by the fact that when firemen rescue people out of wrecked cars they usually have to saw the roof off. The roof was clearly sawed, it wasn't an attempt to make the accident look worse than it was.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Me too. I can see why the late, great pop star Michael Jackson took a liking to her. If she had said "no" to Charles and then asked Michael to marry her when the time was right, he would've said "yes". They would've made a great couple.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.