Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Hide Every Trace of Gladness - Michael's Fans Understand

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Saturday, May 28, 2011

Hide Every Trace of Gladness - Michael's Fans Understand


Marc Schaffel and Debbie Rowe
Christians and Muslims . . . and more




 Revelation 2: 8-10  "8 “And to the angel of the church in Smyrna write, ‘These things says the First and the Last, who was dead, and came to life: 9 “I know your works, tribulation, and poverty (but you are rich); and I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews  and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan. 10 Do not fear any of those things which you are about to suffer. Indeed, the devil is about to throw some of you into prison, that you may be tested, and you will have tribulation ten days. Be faithful until death, and I will give you the crown of life. "


Hide Every Trace of Gladness
Jermaine has a remarkable voice :o)

This gets tossed around on the internet a lot and I’m sure most of you reading already know how I feel about Debbie Rowe – LOYAL – To Michael, not a liar, not an opportunist has she has been betrayed and did one of the most UNSELFISH things that any of Michael’s friends have ever done.  Of course we know the ones bashing her are really not Michael’s friends or defenders.

Someone sent me this video today and I have use it before in reference to posting depositions (with the 2007 “drug” deposition as it has now been referred to) and his 1996 Brett Barnes deposition.

This deposition took place, according to the news item, in 2006 while Michael was still living in Bahrain.  Bahrain is one of the countries being BULLIED right now by the elite’s TROLLS posing as protesting citizens.

Any how, I noticed something very similar going on here in reference to suggestions being made about Marc Shaffel being a porn producer.  Let’s watch:

Michael in 2006

@1:30 minutes on the video the announcer makes it a issue to point out that Marc Schaffel is “dining” with Michael’s “ex-wife” Debbie Rowe.

@1:45  minutes, the announcer says that “jaws dropped” when it was discovered that Schaffel was a producer of gay porn.

So let ‘s stop there for a minute.  Because prior to the trial, Marc Schaffel was remembered for THIS:

In an exclusive interview, Schaffel talks about the situation and the future of "What More Can I Give."

Says Marc Schaffel, "Sony Music are punishing many innocent people who would have been the much needed beneficiaries of the proceeds [of this project]. This the most blatant disgusting act of Corporate greed. Sony should be ashamed of themselves and the public should not let them get away with this, without a stink."

Asked about what the public could do to push Sony Music to release "What More Can I Give," Marc Schaffel answered: "Publicly bringing this [subject] to the attention of the world is the best thing to do. I know that hitting Sony in the pocket book, and bad PR, is another great way of ensuring this gets released and is done properly. The last thing we want is for this to be just 'dumped' out for the sake of the pressure being taken off and minimal funds being raised. All eyes need to be on the company that puts this out to make sure proper attention is given. I know the Sony shareholders are meeting soon. Maybe the last effort should be made to focus on them. If they understand how this issue could potentially hurt Sony both in PR and sales, they will demand the release or replace the people who are hindering this and have made this such a public spectacle for Sony. We need as much support now as ever.

Every fan base from all the artist involved should be making the same demands. Charities that can show they give directly to the needy victims should be getting involved by publicly calling upon Sony to release this or let someone release this. They need to let Sony know not to 'Throw this away', you cannot just 'throw' people's lives away because it is not convenient for you at this time. The charities and all people alike need to join in by publicly showing the world how "stupid" this game is that the record company is playing, and get the victims to write, picket, demonstrate, contact the media, etc. Sony only hopes time will pass and this issue will go away, they do not want to face the public in a bad light. It would be so easy for them to put a little elbow grease behind this and do it properly. Raising a lot of funds would sure help close this wound and give the public a different view. One journalist told me that Sony's nonchalant response was that they already donated 13 million dollars in the past for charitable purposes, and they do not need to do this to prove anything to anyone. They refuse to be 'strong armed' into any fundraising effort. Maybe Sony needs to stop for a second and listen to the lyrics 'what more can I give' and then ask themselves that same question."  Source

@1:50 the announcer cuts to Michael just as he says, “I was shown a video tape by the lawyer and I was shocked, what I saw.  (cut, then ) he was directing two guys they were completely naked from head to toe…” (cut to announcer again).

This is why I do not believe that Schaffel ever directed porn.  No more than I believe Jason Pfeiffer ever said he and Michael were lovers.  He never said it.

When Schaffel was asked in an interview after Michael’s passing about his “porn directing” career, he didn’t even address it.  He didn’t deny it and he didn’t verify it.  He simply said it wasn’t something relevant to what was now going on.

Debbie Rowe would not align herself with anyone that hurt Michael.  But I did want to point out to you, as another example of what these people do to establish fantasy as truth.  You cut from the subject, inject your own comment (speaking for the person interviewed), power of suggestion of a statement THEY NEVER MADE.

Has anyone ever seen a porn film with Schaffel’s name on it?  (I only ask because I don’t watch them, PLEASE do not post a link to one here.)

Someone emailed me with portions of Leonard Rowe’s book AFTER trying to establish with me they believed Prince Al Waleed never broke his relationship with Michael.  While I would love to get back to this relationship, the disappointment soon followed that the object of the three EXTREMELY LONG emails was again the implication that Leonard Rowe was telling the truth about Randy Phillips and AEG in his book, with the slant of “empowerment for black entertainers”.

Now, We know what the connections are between the Prince, Colony Capital and Philip Anschutz.  Did that change?   No.

Leonard Rowe is still a liar regardless of what color he is, regardless of what he could not get accomplished in the concert promotion industry.  I don’t know how to explain what this person was trying to do without posting her correspondence, but I don’t want to waste your time.  I’ve wasted enough of my own reading it.

Michael was NOT anti-white people.  If Leonard Rowe is, that is his problem, not Michael’s.  There is no evidence Michael even hired this guy other than a questionable press release.  There IS however, a letter stating that Leonard Rowe is NOT handling Michael’s affairs.

Leonard Rowe is just another person proving that attempts to infiltrate the Jackson Family and splinter their solidarity are still going strong.  They infiltrate to extract information to be used later for their purposes JUST as they are currently doing to me and those who post to this blog and anyone else that is telling the truth they don’t want others to know.

I will not be posting her comments, but I know who she is.

For anyone else that wants to know . . . Yes, I STILL believe AEG is not the bad guy.  There is NO EVIDENCE they did anything wrong. 

This CONTRACT that is nothing more than a letter of AGREEMENT of discussed terms of an upcoming contract, is TYPICAL of what SONY and other record labels offer talent they are investing their money into.  Rowe says in his book that a contract didn’t exist or he wasn’t given a copy of one, so these people need to MAKE UP THEIR MINDS on WHAT they are going to LIE about.  Either it’s a contract or one doesn’t exist.  Do you even KNOW what a contract IS?

Secondly, Randy Jackson did give an interview to CNN shortly after Michael’s passing.  In that interview Randy talks about the people surrounding Michael and the “coincidences” leading right up to his death.  He does NOT NAME COMPANIES OR PEOPLE.

This information is important because what these people are doing to you and your thinking is the VERY SAME THING the press and media does to YOU and YOUR WAY OF THINKING with regard to anything else you hear on the news.

IT IS NOT NEWS.  It is FANTASY.  It is typical, Tavistock, Psychological gaming with your head, with fancy, cut-out-and-insert, suggestive truthing of information that does not exist as they are presenting it.  It's garbage.  It's gossip written in the same template for delivery.

Who would have thought that our eyes would be opened to such deception?  Michael said in one of his Bible Study notes, “Trust God’s words, not man’s”

For his reason many of Michael’s true friends have been silent for the most part, while the ones responsible for this debacle they call reality are the ones running around and scrambling to do damage control.

Seriously . . . aren’t you guys tired?  Out of breath?  I would be! Here's a free tip . . . TELLING THE TRUTH IS A LOT LESS WORK!  Try it sometime!

Why don’t you guys just sit down . . . take a break and let the truth cover you over because it is going to sooner or later, like it or not.  And everyone you are trying to deceive is going to see it. There is nothing you can do about it and you know it.  You are fighting such a losing battle.

The TRUTH IS –

Somebody with a heart and a love for people, despite the cruddy treatment he received from most, knew SOMETHING had to be done to wake people up.

THE TRUTH IS –

There is a prophecy that some do not want to come to fruition.

THE TRUTH IS –

The timing had to be impeccable

THE TRUTH IS –

God had someone’s back.

That song Jermaine sang above – there is truth in it.  Listen to it.

The interviews Michael gave to Jesse Jackson and Geraldo during the trial – There is truth in it . . . listen to them.

Michael’s songs – TRUTH  Go look at the lyrics. Then listen to him SING while following along with the lyrics.  Then if there are films MICHAEL MADE for those songs, watch those with the lyrics in hand.  Pay attention to detail.  He did!  And he put that detail in FOR A YOU.

Michael’s relatives twitter – again there is truth in it.  Don’t just take them at face value.  You will be surprised what you learn when you take a little Twittered phrase, copy it with a “+ Michael Jackson” in the search and see what you come up with.  Makes for interesting reading.

Same thing with the news.  Don’t just accept what they are telling you, do your own homework and research. 

The news is not your friend.  They do not love you, nor does any of those men who have occupied the White House in as long as most can remember.  They don’t care about you.  They do however, NEED you!  There is no purpose in obtaining power without having subjects in which to have power over.

Discrimination is alive and well in New Jersey


Update in Xanadu and Colony Capital – I haven’t talked about these guys in a while.  I was sent an email from someone ELSE today (think it was Spotlight), who did a little checkup for me.

If you remember from back last year, Colony Capital had taken over the project in Bergen County, New Jersey in 2009.  Finally after diddling around with the mob-controlled  building code administrators, environmental credits, labor unions, and stonewall after stonewall, Colony Capital reportedly threw up  their hands and said to the bank, “You deal with them” and left the project.

Now lookie!  Some company steps in with the “eh-hem” RIGHT agenda, lineage and allegiance to the false Jews (hereto known as THE ESTABLISHMENT) and all of a sudden, things get approved. 

They now announce that they plan to open the first phase in September of 2013 and the second phase in 2014.   So I did some background on the NEW collaborators:


Owner of the Xanadu-renamed-American Dream (Nightmare) is the sports authority of NJ.

Developer is Triple 5 Group:  

Triple Five Group is a shopping mall owner and operator, hotel operator and real estate company based in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. They are well known for their ownership of the Mall of America and West Edmonton Mall.[1] The company is also developing American Dream Meadowlands in New Jersey in association with a local developer.

The company is closely held, owned and operated by the Ghermezian family of Canada. It maintains executive offices in Alberta and Las Vegas, Nevada.
Ghermenzian Family:  "The Ghermezian family is a Canadian family of Iranian Jewish origin who have developed several of the world's largest shopping malls. The family's holdings include the Mall of America in Bloomington, Minnesota and the West Edmonton Mall in Edmonton, Canada.[1][2] In 2011, the family's Triple Five Group company acquired the troubled Xanadu Meadowlands project in New Jersey. Triple Five renamed the project American Dream Meadowlands and has announced a major expansion and revamping of the under-construction mall, now expected to open in 2015.

(if Michael has any hope of still having a part in this, it is through this family, but see below).

"Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II has honoured the senior members of the Ghermezian family with medals of honour in recognition of their significant contributions to compatriots, community and economy of Canada."  Source  http://www.ghermezian.com/  And they are on board with Planned Parenthood - Eugenics believers.

Owner of "Related Companies" who will be managing it now:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Related_Companies

Owner of company is Stephen Ross

"Ross was co-chair of the University of Michigan's fund raising campaign, which was completed May 2007. He is currently serving on President Mary Sue Coleman's Advisory Group and the Director's Cabinet in the University’s Department of Intercollegiate Athletics. In 2004, Ross made the single largest contribution to the University of Michigan by donating $100 million to the school.[3] The University renamed its business school, Ross School of Business in his honor.

He was on the executive committee of NYC2012, New York’s initiative to bring the summer Olympic Games to New York City in 2012, which failed when London won instead. As a trustee of the Guggenheim Museum (NYC) Ross is involved in the planning for a major renovation of the Frank Lloyd Wright building and other new museums. He is a member of the executive committee and board of directors of the Real Estate Board of New York, a trustee of the National Building Museum and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation. Ross is also Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Centerline Capital Group, and is a trustee of the National Building Museum and the Jackie Robinson Foundation, and longtime supporter of the UJA Federation of New York."

He began his career as a tax attorney at Coopers & Lybrand in Detroit, where he was born and raised as a child, and went on to become assistant vice president in the real estate subsidiary of Laird Inc. and in the corporate finance department of Bear Stearns, both in New York City.

We know what happened to Bear Stearns (GuggenHeim - all good little Zionists-World-Government people belong to at least TWO of these foundation-funded organizations)

"On March 17, 2008, JP Morgan Chase offered to acquire Bear Stearns at a price of $2 per share or $236 million. On March 24, 2008, that offer was raised to $10 per share or $1.1 billion in an effort to pacify angry shareholders. JPMorgan Chase completed its acquisition of Bear Stearns on May 30, 2008 at the renegotiated price of $10 per share. The U.S. Federal Reserve rewarded Bear Stearns' shareholders in the deal by taking responsibility for $29 billion in toxic assets in Bear Stearns' portfolio."

We bailed them out - Tax payer dollars.  But that was long after Ross left their employ.

Yeah, this guy is establishment all the way.  Funny how they were able to get everything okay'd for THIS GUY, but gave two previous companies the run-around including Colony Capital because . . ..  they consider them the enemy and anti establishment.
See?  Michael’s not the only one that gets doors shut in his face.  Gotta be Talmud if you want the project in New Jersey!

Yes, that’s exactly how I feel.  But Barrack did not get where he is by fighting losing battles.  After all, he’s now got Miramax.  There are plenty of Mike-like projects and opportunities for family-oriented activity complexes.  He’s got a good partner with the same goals and ideas he once shared with Mr. Michael.  And I still have yet to see any reason why they would abandon the vision Michael had.

Goodnight and have a great weekend.  By the end of next week, I should have my research completed for the direction this blog will take next. 

We’ve gotten to know Michael’s heart.  Michael also had an amazing brain . . . let’s get to know that too.

God Bless you, and when watching the news (if you must), keep an open mind.  There is a lot of victimization going on in the news.  I don’t like it at all.  Most people in the Middle East from what I have researched, do not hate Americans and they do not hate the people of Israel.   They’re not too happy with either of their governments right now but seriously . . . I’m not either.  Please think of them and understand their frustration.  Most of your real Muslim’s right now are in Michael’s shoes.  Think of it like that when you watch the news . . . and their persecution and being used has been going on longer than what Michael went through at the hands of the same elitist people. 

Please Pray for them.  They are human beings as are all of us.

If anyone from the Middle East reads this blog, please know that some Americans do know what is going on and I want you to know that we are not all bad either.  We HATE seeing what is going on over there and feel powerless to do anything other than pray.  If Michael and Prince Al Waleed could be friends, and Michael and the Prince in Bahrain could be friends, a Christian and a Muslim who believes in the same God of Abraham, we know that Love God created us with is still here to medicate our hearts with hope.



I ask that anyone in the Middle East and African countries right now under siege, if you have access and do see this, please just pray for God to see, for hearts to open and to love each other the way Jesus wanted us to love each other.

I love you and I am so sorry to see you being lied about and hurt.

See you all next week –   {{{{{{{♥♥♥♥♥♥}}}}}}}


53 comments:

  1. I found this, Awesome stuff to help you understand:

    "Most of the messages to the churches follow a similar format (with Smyrna and Philadelphia being the exception to this rule). Christ addresses each of the churches in a particular way which reveals something about Himself. He also finds areas of strength, virtue, and commendation to reinforce and encourage the churches. He will then tell about the negative aspects of the church and the various sins each are guilty of (whether it be idolatry, false teaching, apathy, immorality, etc.). He then pleads with each church to repent of their sinful deeds. Then the churches are faced with the choice of a blessing or a curse. For the "overcomers" there are promises and blessings beyond the wildest imagination of the reader. Consequently, for the unrepentant, there is the promise of sure judgement- both temporal and eternal. One theme that you begin to see is the great love that Christ has for His churches and for His servants. Even despite their failures and shortcomings, you see the outstretched arms of a loving Saviour. Rather than leaving each church to their own devices, Jesus intervenes to warn them of impending danger." Source - http://www.truthablaze.com/church.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. More on the church of Smyrna (who was monetarily poor, but spiritually rich...) http://www.truthablaze.com/smyrna.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bonnie,
    After reading Leonards Rowe's book, the two things that stood out for me were that, by his own admission a) despite allegedly being hired to look out for Michael's finances for TII, Michael never trusted him enough to actually hand over any details, and b) Rowe was unable to reschedule concert dates, but later DiLeo managed to do just that within days of being re-hired.
    Rowe also said that the contract was despicable, and would lose Michael money. That seemed plausible at face value, but I did some calculations on my blog, and it turns out Michael would have made millions from 50 shows. If a concert promoter with 30 years experience can't work that out, I can understand why Michael didn't want him handling his finances!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bonnie said - "We’ve gotten to know Michael’s heart. Michael also had an amazing brain . . . let’s get to know that too."

    >>>>>>Bonnie...that was an awesome statement! I hope everyone here has a lot of time, because when it comes to Michael's brain, there are no shortcuts and the well runs deep! All kidding aside, it's true that we know Michael's heart, which was never the reason for his persecution. That came from what he KNOWS! Michael's intellect, insatiable appetite for knowledge, meeting with other cultures, and his powers of observation of what's going on in the world were grossly underestimated. It's what made him a formidable opponent against the "system" that was relentless in their attempts to silence him!

    Wonderful blog tonight, Bonnie. I'll be thinking of you over the weekend and hoping all goes well for you and Ed. Love you both...and don't worry - we'll take good care of Michael while you're away! ♥

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bonnie looks what they written in Europe.

    Here's what happens when you make fun of the fans:
    "Sony Music: Jackson effect, 10% reduction in turnover"
    One fan replied:
    "Fans of Michael and Michael himself deserve the best, that all the naturalness and authenticity that this wonderful artist gave his life in the studio and on stage.
    No one should no longer afford to get their hands on his work.
    The only thing we need is the authenticity and purity of his art.
    Without This does not go anywhere.
    It may seem trivial, but it is reality.
    The Sony sowing evil and collects worse. "
    After!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Bonnie,
    This hasn't got much to do with this blog entry but what do you think of the 'Casio' family do you think they are real friends of Michael?
    I think one of them is writing a book. xxxx

    ReplyDelete
  7. Dear Bonnie,
    this page of your blog, I like very because you have nice words about the population of the Middle East. These people have the misfortune to have large sources of oil / money. That's it!
    God bless you Bonnie!

    ReplyDelete
  8. BONNIE : "No more than I believe Jason Pfeiffer ever said he and Michael were lovers. He never said it."

    This Video below however suggests it :

    http://www.hiphoprx.com/2010/05/04/jason-pfeiffer-claims-he-had-a-sexual-gay-relationship-with-michael-jackson/

    Publishing such a Video after Michael's passing was so unfair (to be polite) : Michael's private life was of NO public concern & he is not here to approve nor to reject this statement. Did it bring any bucks to disclose such news ? As to Marc Schaffel & Wiesner & Konitzer, well, I just hope they will keep away later from the MJ3.

    I see evil everywhere maybe but everything was done to Michael i.e. on the wrong side generally. Positive is that at least many fans will continue to love & defend his memory for long. Rest in Peace, Michael, whereever you are.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hello everyone, I have not had any new blogs up because I am not near my own computer. We also had a mishap with our car while away (two high school graduations to attend out of state) and I broke my toe (yes, on the same injured leg). It has not been completely a bad time, but not as UN-eventful as I would have hoped.

    I want to answer all these posts one by one, but I am not on my own computer and I've had trouble posting my own comments (at least I got yours moderated!)

    LIne - The interview above is mis-appropriated statements made by the press on Jason's behalf. Jason never said what they claimed he said. This is the press. The interview itself was chopped up and edited to make it appear as if Jason was saying something he wasn't. Jason gave an interview, THEY turned it into something it wasn't. Jason addressed this in a statement released AFTER this interview explaining that they took what he said out of context and misquoted him in papers. Sound familiar?

    Also, it seems certain slimey individuals just love to take advantage of my inability to get to a computer and address certain LIES. With that said, I will have to bide my time. I will say this. I have had NO ONE from the Jackson Camp come to THI8 BLOG and accuse me of printing lies. This includes RAYMONE BAIN.

    In her correspondence to another blog in which she addressed MISPRINTS on that blog, she stated that she did not know me. This is correct. She does not know me. She also to MY KNOWLEDGE does not know Craig Williams as CRAIG is not the one that interviewed her. Craig is the one editing and producing the video that is slated to be shown on Jume 25th, 2011. HOwever, since THE OTHER BLOG printed her phone number, I will be sure to give her a call because I DO NOT believe Bain is one of the bad guys.

    Michael said in his interview with Jesse Jackson, 2005, that this is a VERY DELICATE ISSUE, and there may be certain pieces of info that certain individuals do not know how I am getting, and OTHER individuals don't want put together yet. This is where I usually run into trouble in my quest to get the truth out there.

    The difference between ME and the OTHER blogger I mention is that THIS BLOG is to defend and protect Michael and those who are helping him. THE OTHER BLOGGER is more intent on defending Branca and the Estate Executors, whom the Jackson's THEMSELVES know are in their fraudulently.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hi Anonymous (?),

    On J. Pfeiffer, I personally have no way to check the truth but yes, the press is usually just too happy to misuse Michael's name : it sells. Whatever, my only real concern as always is: what HAPPENED on 06.25.2009 ? the family first & his fans will need to know once & get some peace although I'm sure Michael himself is at peace now & feels the love around him, at last.

    The other issues you mentioned are not of my knowledge but I DO hope any possible misunderstanding will calm down quickly & all parties will get back soon to peace with each other, at least for Michael's memory.

    God Bless

    ReplyDelete
  11. Bonnie dear (Anonymous), thanks! We are waiting for you. You must take all the time you need to return in great shape.
    God bless you!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Bonnie,
    What are you doin' gurl? You've broken your toe now? I guessed something was up as you had gone a bit 'quiet', but I look forward to hearing about what is going on with the other blog too. These people are unreal. Like you, I don't want to post anything unless it helps and supports Michael, but it still drives me crazy not knowing what you know!!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Bonnie – last night I watched Piers Morgan interviewing Paris Hilton and her mother Cathy Hilton, he asked the mother about her friendship with Michael. She was telling him they were friends since she was 14 and he was 13 or vice versa and remained friends forever.

    She said so many good things about him that we all know already. However, what I like the most is when she said “Michael is not a drug addict, he had a sleep problem whenever he was preparing for concert and he needed some help to help him sleep.” I thought the prosecutors should really call her to a witness stand and she will be a good source to explain that Michael is not a drug addict as the defense trying to paint him as one.

    Please watch the interview it is really interesting what she said about him. She even said she was in the hospital and Latoya took her inside where his body was to say goodbye to him.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hi Bonnie,

    Sorry to read about your troubles :(, so I'm going to put some good thoughts out there for you all, that the rest of your time away be as un-eventful as you wished it. Safe journey home.

    Congratulations to the graduates. =)♥

    ReplyDelete
  15. http://www.showbiz411.com/2011/06/02/michael-jackson-documentary-from-old-pal-david-gest-gets-screened
    I think that will be a nice documentary to watch.
    Bye!

    ReplyDelete
  16. I just got in the door and set my luggage on my bed. We walked into the house and found the air conditioner was not working. It's been in the high 90's down here all week. My husband took the front panel off and everything was frozen. He clicked a couple of things and found the fan had stopped working but the coolant was still moving through trying to cool, which froze up everything.

    Between that, my toe and the car repair - I am never leaving home again, so that is the update.

    Mimi - On Paris Hilton's mother. I don't know her or her character but I am sure I have never seen a picture of her with Michael in my thousands that I have seen of him through the years. I have seen ONE with Paris and her sister with Michael at some gathering back in 2002. I don't think Cathy would even know if Michael was a drug addict or not. Again where were all these "friends" during his trial? I'm happy she said something nice about Michael, but if any of the Hilton's were anywhere near that hospital with Latoya to "see Michael's body" don't you think it would have been all over the press?

    Princessglam - I will tell you about my toe tomorrow. If you had seen this on television you would have been doing everything in your power to keep from laughing at me. (I was a good girl - didn't curse, but I did wake my husband up trying to whine through both hands covering my mouth.)

    Judith - Thank you, we did have a safe journey home and I can thank God that he kept the roads relatively clear of accidents and backups both going up and coming back (on a holiday weekend! Couldn't ask for better travel conditions!) It was what happened at either points of interest that made me regret the trip. We have good friends and good relatives or we would have been stranded.

    Skiper - Thank you so much for your kind words and thank you for posting the link . . . but David Guest is not Michael's friend. He is bad news, Skiper.

    Line - On Pfeiffer, I agree. I do not know anything about Pfeiffer other than I know he did not say what the press accused him of saying. It was one of the first lessons I learned on this blog about how the press chops and takes statements out of context to tell a story THEIR WAY. I don't know if Jason is a bad guy or a good guy. I do know that the "lover" think was a total press fabrication.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Welcome back, Bonnie ! Without your Blogs it was indeed a long week.

    And that toe, grrr.. ? not "poupoupitoe" yet ? As you sing very well, try this Marilyn Song "I Want To Be Loved By You" : light but good for the moral ..Hhhh.. what I wouln't do to raise your spirits :oD

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQIvhotZSUw&NR=1

    BTW what is this "Raymonde Bain" story ? didn't find anything re: your comment above.

    ReplyDelete
  18. .."Mimi - On Paris Hilton's mother. I don't know her or her character but I am sure I have never seen a picture of her with Michael in my thousands that I have seen of him through the years. I have seen ONE with Paris and her sister with Michael at some gathering back in 2002. I don't think Cathy would even know if Michael was a drug addict or not. Again where were all these "friends" during his trial? I'm happy she said something nice about Michael, but if any of the Hilton's were anywhere near that hospital with Latoya to "see Michael's body" don't you think it would have been all over the press?..."
    ------------------------------------------------


    Greetings! 'Bonnie',

    Are you suggesting/implying that the Hiltons were not telling the truth about seeing/visiting Michael in the hospital on 6/25/09? Maybe the press was not allowed in that area of the hospital....

    ReplyDelete
  19. @Line - Thank you . . . It's good to be back, except our air conditioning burned up while we were gone, LOL! (throws up hands!) This has been one LAUGHABLE weekend. I loved seeing our friends and my two boys, and we brought my stepson back with us . . . but anything that mechanically could go wrong went wrong. Talk about being TESTED! (not sure if I passed yet . . . will have to pray a request for my grades. I give myself a "C").

    I will get more into Raymone later, probably Monday. I do not want to say anything that will hurt anyone or get them into trouble, so it may very well be that I can't say anything. I personally like her but I can't put my finger on why I feel that way. She seems to me to be genuine . . . just a gut feeling.
    ---------------------------------------------

    @Anonymous - I am suggesting/implying that there is a possibility that they may be lying yes. But don't worry . . . they would not be the first. I find it kind of amusing that more people claim frienships with Michael than Michael mentions friendships with them. It also amazes me how many "close friends" he seems to have AFTER DEATH then he had before death . . . . don't you?

    ReplyDelete
  20. BONNIE : " I do not want to say anything that will hurt anyone or get them into trouble, so it may very well be that I can't say anything."

    No problem, relax ! who did what to Michael on 6.25.2009 is what matters to me (& many) & this is already a long way to go.
    Good Week-End

    ReplyDelete
  21. Maybe you should look at the Hilton's interview with P. Morgan as there is a snapshot posted of MJ with the Hilton family and if you find the original long version of the CNN video of the interview (before CNN conveniently removed the last few minutes of the interview) you will see that K. Hilton persuasively debunks the drug addict theory.

    ReplyDelete
  22. @Anonymous - Many fans have had their pics taken and/or shopped next to Michael. That doesn't make them best friends except in their own minds. I just looked at the interview and I'm sorry but they don't impress me. I did say that I am glad they are "debunking" the "drug" story, since it is exactly that . . . a story.

    I hope you will understand that when it comes to people suddenly announcing their "long frienship" with Michael AFTER DEATH, I'm a little jaded and I don't trust them at face value. And quite frankly it's not the purpose of this blog to dissect the Hilton Family. If they are debunking a rumor about ANYONE, then good on them. But I keep my eyes open. I feel that is fair.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous said - "Hilton's interview with P. Morgan as there is a snapshot posted of MJ with the Hilton family and if you find the original long version of the CNN video of the interview (before CNN conveniently removed the last few minutes of the interview)"

    ..... Perhaps since you've obviously seen this long version, you could post the link here?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Line said - "No problem, relax ! who did what to Michael on 6.25.2009 is what matters to me (& many) & this is already a long way to go.
    Good Week-End "

    ...... LOL! Yes, I agree, but sometimes digging into what was done to him prior and by WHOM will reveal a pattern that will lead us right to that person/people responsible. This was not just one person, but I don't have to tell you that . . . you already know this. Yes, I feel we still have some time to go.

    This documentary that is supposed to come out on the 25th of this month (the Craig Williams documentary) is going to be very interesting because the people that I have talked to and who have called me regarding this have such a slant to this info. They (meaning Williams and Lowe/Vintage Pop) were both trying to convince me that Michael was a drug addict and wanted information from me that they should already have if they are interviewing people like Mesereau and Bain. (Include the "fired" Wilburn in the group).

    I am not qualified to tell Michael's story. I am only trying to uncover the lies by others trying to MIS-TELL his story.

    ReplyDelete
  25. @ Anonymous - You said - "Maybe the press was not allowed in that area of the hospital.... "


    ..... Wouldn't the Hilton family have had to ENTER the hospital? We saw everyone from Tohme and DiLeo to Michael's family in and out of the hospital, but not the Media-hound Hiltons? Paris makes her living getting her picture taken at events. No mention of the Hiltons being anywhere NEAR Michael or the hospital EVER by friend OR enemy of Michael until now.

    Paris has been waning in media interest lately. What a way to get her back into the limelight. Guess Gaga is stealing some of her thunder.

    ReplyDelete
  26. @BONNIE
    Re Mrs. Kathy Hilton in Michael's Hospital room on 06.25.2009

    OK I tend to be more credulous than you on the news I read but I hardly imagine Mrs. Hilton displaying that info on such a TRAGIC day on US TV if it were lies (or?) : the Jackson family would react. Now the real degree of friendship Michel & his family had or have with the Hiltons, we don't know really. Maybe Kathy Hilton really paid her tribute to Michael & on the way of course, PUBLICITY for the Hilton's name is not neglectable & Michael's name is now the "right one to place" : I hate that expression talking about Michael, but this is how many used & still misuse him. But Mrs Hilton only said very nice things about Michael so I prefer not to break my neurones on her sincere (or not?) motivations. But you are RIGHT : now more than ever, it is difficult to blindly believe in people's true & sincere tribute for Michael when instead during the 2005 trials most showbiz celeb (or pseudo-celeb) turned their back on him. Even Sony & the lawyer who made business with & on Michael for years & re-started business with him 8 days before his passing did not even show up at the Memorial to show their respect (yes, what respect indeed?). Sad.

    But even for a simple fan like me or others, did it really need the shock of Michael's passing to realize how much we could miss a human (not the artist only) we never met ?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Bonnie – sorry to hear about your toe. I said, not again. I am glad all is well with you now. I know doctors can’t put a cask on broken toe, and they just put tape together with the next toe to protect it. I broke one long time ago and it was very painful.

    Is this documentary supposed to come out on Michael’s anniversary going to air on national TV or where? I am just wondering because I haven’t seen any advertisement for it.

    I couldn't be able to post with my name with a computer that is not mine. I don't know what happen, and I used to do it before.

    Mimi

    ReplyDelete
  28. Line said - "Now the real degree of friendship Michel & his family had or have with the Hiltons, we don't know really. Maybe Kathy Hilton really paid her tribute to Michael & on the way of course, PUBLICITY for the Hilton's name is not neglectable & Michael's name is now the "right one to place"

    ......... Here is what I find really hard to believe. The Hiltons, who before June 25th have had no visible connection/frienship with any of the Jackson's, are allowed into Michael's hospital room BEFORE the family even gets there while this Cathy person supposedly rubs Michael's head, feet, arms and legs. There was no one at the hospital yet - according to THEM to even give them the okay. Some doctor supposedly just let them in, knowing what Paris is famous for? No pictures other than the one I have on file of Paris and Michael with the other Hilton Sister (can't remember her name) is the ONLY shot of them together.

    You know what this sounds like to me? Another red herring surfacing to get the attention and reaction of the Jacksons. Nothing more. I have NO CONFIDENCE in this story whatsoever and it's not worth the time off this blog. No, I don't believe her. The only convincing piece of information in that interview is that Michael is not a drug addict and that is because I already KNOW that.

    don't worry, I am not going to "break my neurons", over the Hiltons, LOL. The only truthful thing she said is that he is not a drug addict. The rest IN MY OPINION is fantasy. I don't see the Jackson's singing her praises about her loving support when Michael needed it. Period.
    --------------------------------------------

    Mimi said - "Is this documentary supposed to come out on Michael’s anniversary going to air on national TV or where? "

    .......... Thank you on the toe. I just can't believe it. You would think I play competitive sports the way I keep getting injured! ( I don't by the way) Brought tears to my eyes and my hands to my mouth to stifle the cries. The documentary I was told, was going to be in theaters (they were looking for a distributor) The reason you haven't seen any advertisement for it is because it was supposed to be hush-hush.

    I had the same problem trying to post a comment on my own blog while staying with our friends in Maryland. I think it has to do with cookies or clearing the cache, but I didn't want to mess with his computer. So I just posted as "anonymous" and identified myself. What a pain! When did this change???

    ReplyDelete
  29. Hi, Bonnie...I am SO GLAD you're back! It's awful being left "alone" for a week and not have you to call when the mind wanders. Do us a favor, will you? Don't ever go out of town again for more than two days...LOL! Your poor toe...can't believe your bad luck! But remember you're "Super Woman" - you can always cut a hole in those sexy red boots!

    Since we touched on the subject of how the media cleverly uses cut-and-paste editing to put their own spin on a story (i.e., Kathy Hilton), I noticed something disturbing while watching Part 1 of Frank Dileo's interview by Raffles Entertainment in 2009.

    At 1:58 Frank discusses Michael's weight during the TII rehearsals. A few seconds later keep your eye on Frank - at 2:06-2:08 you will hear a glitch or pop sound, which means Frank's words were being edited and the tape was altered. The second after Frank says, "I went back to that staff member" you will hear the pop and Frank's head jerks slightly, clearly indicating the audio and video were edited. Then you hear Frank say Michael "weighed 136 pounds and not 108 pounds." Makes you wonder why that segment was edited. What did Frank really say that we never got to hear???

    Multiply this crap by how many hundreds of times we've seen videos of people speaking about Michael and you have to take it all with a BIG grain of salt! This Raffles interview was a series of questions prepared on behalf of that "admirable" group of justice seekers, "This is Not It!" You know, the ones in a desperate panic over Michael's well being - but yet were busy spending all their time designing and launching a very professional website several weeks BEFORE June 25, 2009!

    Like I said...a very BIG grain of salt! Here's the link

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7NqrDLdN0A&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

    ReplyDelete
  30. Jermaine Jackson on his twitter account thanked her for saying the sweet things she did about Michael on the Piers Morgan Show. I have a feeling that, even though we think we know all about Michael's life with regards to who he knew and hung out with, we don't. Are you referring to the picture with Paris and Nicole Ritchie? It's been well known that he was friends, close friends with Lionel Richie and his daughter. Kathy Hilton was escorted in to say goodbye to Michael via Randy and LaToya. Is it at all possible that, the so called media hound Hiltons as you call them, may not be that and like Michael they too have been presented to us via a media that I don't trust or like?

    My question is why - why would anyone go to such trouble to lie so blatantly about something that could easily be disputed by his family? How do you know Kathy Hilton didn't support Michael in some way? I'm just saying it's all speculation when it comes down to it. Until I see evidence that this is in fact a lie - I will believe the message coming directly from the source. It's getting so hard to discern any semblance of truth with so much speculation and little actual evidence.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Anon said - "Jermaine Jackson on his twitter account thanked her for saying the sweet things she did about Michael on the Piers Morgan Show."

    ........ Jermaine also thanked Charles Thomson for apologizing and thanked Muzikfactory for saying something truthful about Michael even though she ripped into his mother in previous blogs. I looked at the video. Take a close look at that picture of Michael with "The Hiltons" Look at Michael's shirt where Ms. Cathy's hand is.

    @ 1:02 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJQZPhtU7Ho Look at the picture.

    Further into the interview, she can't even remember something as momentous as what Michael said about her daughter. Paris had to REMIND HER to plug the recording studio "memory". She moves her arms around an awful lot when she's trying to remember what she's supposed to say and at the end of this video, the plug for "Paris's business empire" is I guess part of the script?

    There is also the issue of the naming of the children "Paris". Michael TOLD US how his daughter got her name and it had NOTHING to do with Miss Hilton Jr. Funny he didn't seem to mention this in his interview.

    You will have to look at the ideology behind everything they did to Michael to fathom why it is so important to try and cover it up with interviews such as these. His family doesn't have the luxury of disputing much of anything until the time is right. The press does what the press does. We know that through Michael.

    How do I know CH didn't support Michael in some way? Well, she DID support him . . . AFTER JUNE 25TH. Like most of those who didn't give two hoots about him until then.

    The SOURCE would be who? The Hiltons? Michael himself? What evidence do you have that she supported Michael BEFORE June 25th?

    ReplyDelete
  32. @ Anonymous - I will give you a hint. Stop that video above at 1:02. Look at Cathy Hilton's HAND and Michael's SHIRT.

    Since when did her wrist become see through and Michael's shirt bleed into her hand? This is RIDICULOUS!

    I've seen this photo before and the person standing beside Mr. Hilton is NOT Michael in the original photograph.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Okay - I'm going to look at it - a see through wrist is pretty spectacular ;). See that is what I'm wondering - where is that original picture because there is a part of me that wondered that. Thanks :)

    ReplyDelete
  34. Bonnie, you have proved once again that you are amazing! Nothing gets past you, does it? Good thing, too! I knew you were going to pick up on that bit about how Paris got her name! Debbie Rowe already cleared up that bit of trivia (conceived in Paris, thus named for the City of Lights!). And you are so right about that group photo. I noticed the see through hand immediately! And also how short Michael looks for a man who's a statuesque 5ft 10in tall. He doesn't look much taller than Kathy herself when you match up the top of their head. Even with the added height of a fedora, he is dwarfed next to Daddy Hilton. PHOTOSHOPPED! What cracks me up is...how badly it's done!

    ReplyDelete
  35. @Anonymous - "http://crushable.com/entertainment/kathy-hilton-at-michael-jacksons-residence/

    ..... Hm, a headline and a picture is all we need to believe Michael wanted to be white.

    A headline and a picture is all we needed to believe Michael was a pedophile . . .

    A headline and a picture was all we needed to believe that Michael was buying the elephant man's bones . . . get my point? If that is actually Kathy (Cathy - seen it spelled both ways now), she sure has lost a lot of weight and wrinkles in the last two years. Good for her!

    I can't account for what you see or don't see, but if you feel the need to convince yourself that the photo shown in that video is actually genuine, see-through wrist and all, then the only thing I can suggest is possibly a really good ophthalmologist. I'll leave the link up for you, just in case you need to run to Hilton and tell her to magic-marker in that spot on the photo before reloading it to the internet. ;o) . Not a big deal. She DID say SOMETHING nice about Michael - again, So did Tommy Mottola - guess that makes him Mike's best friend too, right? (shrugs).
    ------------------------------------------

    Spotlight said - "Debbie Rowe already cleared up that bit of trivia (conceived in Paris, thus named for the City of Lights!). And you are so right about that group photo. I noticed the see through hand immediately! And also how short Michael looks for a man who's a statuesque 5ft 10in tall."

    ........ Thanks for the link to the video. Michael also cleared that up on the Bashir interview when he told Bashir that Paris was named Paris because of where she was concieved (get that Anonymous? Michael . . . the SOURCE said this).

    Yes, Michael's head again is so much smaller than everyone elses, plus his picture and coloring is totally not matching with the lighting of the rest of the folks in that picture PLUS the photoshopping was badly done - her right wrist and his left side of his shirt overlap.. One has to wonder, IF they were friends, why is this necessary to convince? and what was the point of the interview (oh yeah, plug Paris H's businesses. Pretty sad that even the HILTONS can't market anything now without the Jackson name. Elites must be fuming!)

    ReplyDelete
  36. Spotlight said - "Raffles interview was a series of questions prepared on behalf of that "admirable" group of justice seekers, "This is Not It!" You know, the ones in a desperate panic over Michael's well being - but yet were busy spending all their time designing and launching a very professional website several weeks BEFORE June 25, 2009!

    Like I said...a very BIG grain of salt! Here's the link

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7NqrDLdN0A&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL "

    You are absolutely right . . . at 2:08 minutes and it's a really sloppy splice job too (speakers were up too loud, hurt my ears). I wonder who the "staff member" was? (Karen?)

    ReplyDelete
  37. Why such a controversy & sarcastic comments on a superficial Video which for once was nice to Michael ? except for hers & daughter's publicity or her silence with the press since 2005 (what were the reasons, we don't know), Kathy Hilton seems OK & she wouldn't be around the Jackson family if they had serious doubts on her sincerity (if she says she met the Jacksons a few weeks ago in Calabasas, why not ? I mean, KH is rich & famous : why would she need to invent & lie like a young Hollywood wannabee ? Do also the Jacksons need to report to the media each detail of their social relationship ? Michael's real enemies & profiteurs, past or present, are rather the ones to be watched out.

    ReplyDelete
  38. @Line - Look at the photo. THAT is why I have doubts as to her sincerity. HISTORY is why I have doubts as to her sincerity. THEY are the ones that put themselves out there with a fake photo. ASK THEM WHY they have to do such a thing if they are genuine, life long friends. Who said she was around the Jackson family?

    I am not the one WATCHING the Hiltons I did not bring them up. If something is WRONG I am going to point it out. The issue I had was the hand-holding best friend story, not what she said about Michael. LOTS of people have been NICE TO MICHAEL SINCE HE IS GONE. The CASCIOS were VERY NICE TO MICHAEL but they at least had a verifiable relationship WITHOUT THE AFTER DEATH PRESS RELEASES.

    If you can explain the sloppy photoshop she produced for this interview (she couldn't have found anything else to use???) then you can chastise me about the controversy.

    ReplyDelete
  39. BONNIE : "Look at the photo. THAT is why I have doubts as to her sincerity"

    Honest, I maybe blind or about to be but if I myself look at that pic only once quickly & since I did not study photoshop art, I may gobble that pic for genuine :o((. So it was photoshopped : then bad for the Hiltons. What more can I say?

    On the Cascios : you have a good point.

    On the Hiltons generally : I don't care just that I found the Video nice to Michael although shown very late after 06.25.2009 so it really came as a surprise too many.

    Me CHASTIZE YOU ?? I wouldn't DARE .. ending like a mashed potato :oD ... but giving one's own opinion is anyone's right, as long as one remains decent & avoids hurting comments♥

    MIMI, where are youuu ? Heeelp ! you are the one who started to talk about the Hilton Video :oD

    ReplyDelete
  40. BONNIE : "Who said she was around the jackson family ?"

    I forgot to reply to you on the question above. On the longer version below, at 5:25 :

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJQZPhtU7Ho&feature=related

    ReplyDelete
  41. Bonnie: First of all I have been reading your blog for a long time now. I find your posts fascinating and confusing (for me) at times-I'm learning though. The reason I posted was because sometimes you make broad and sweeping statements and I like to look at all aspects so I ask questions to find out. I need evidence not assumptions.

    BonnieL"but if you feel the need to convince yourself that the photo shown in that video is actually genuine, see-through wrist and all, then the only thing I can suggest is possibly a really good ophthalmologist."

    You believe it isn't genuine. I showed it to my sister who is a graphic artist and has worked with photoshop programs professionally for many years(her opinion satisfied my inquiry). You have yours I have mine. It's all good. Had my eyes checked just recently and 20/20 at almost 50 - pretty good - so no visit to ophthalmologist here. ;)

    BonnieL"I'll leave the link up for you, just in case you need to run to Hilton and tell her to magic-marker in that spot on the photo before reloading it to the internet. ;o"

    No Bonnie - you don't know me so that behavior you have labeled me as engaging in is not how I operate. You've made an assumption based on some comments and questions I have.

    BonnieL"Not a big deal. She DID say SOMETHING nice about Michael - again, So did Tommy Mottola - guess that makes him Mike's best friend too, right? (shrugs)."

    She said more then something nice - she said he died and she said that she didn't see him as a drug addict which has been edited out of the CNN video link. Two important comments that are being made at a time of heightened controversy and confusion.

    I wish you well. I'm just inquiring - not judging or attacking anyone. Raising questions and inquiring to learn.

    Thank you for your time - I will continue to read your posts and learn from them.

    I post as anonymous because honestly I can't get the other options to work appropriately. I tell you this only in that I don't want you to think I'm some crazed stalker poster. I've never posted on your site before because I couldn't get it to work. Thanks again.
    LorLor

    ReplyDelete
  42. Line said - "Honest, I maybe blind or about to be but if I myself look at that pic only once quickly & since I did not study photoshop art, I may gobble that pic for genuine :o((. So it was photoshopped : then bad for the Hiltons. What more can I say?"

    ........ Honestly I passed by it the first time and it wasn't until the smaller version of it behind Kathy's head showed that I noticed the hand/wrist. I may be a bit biased when it comes to the Hiltons because of past Paris behavior but I have to tell you something. When I was in the hospital May and June of 2007 recovering from an emergency surgery I never should have had to have, All I could do was lay there and watch T.V. I couldn't even read because I had all these tubes all over the place and a 15" incision down my middle.

    All over the T.V. during that time was Paris Hilton in Jail, out of Jail, back in Jail to finish her sentence, scenes of her crying, stories of her parents telling the press she was being persecuted because of who she was. She drove without a license, HIT someone without a license, drove drunk, missed court dates and they had finally had enough.

    However - I cried for that girl, not because I was being a wuss, but because I believed she truly did not understand why she was paying a consequence for her actions and that was NOT HER FAULT but that of her upbringing. I felt every bit if fear she was going through and I prayed for her to find God in this situation.

    I cried for her, I cried for Britney Spears and because I couldn't get away from the T.V. I was educated on what both these girls were going through during that time. You remember how Paris became famous don't you?

    These two girls were still basically children, over exposed and SOLD into this industry for fame and money. They are taught/told what to do, who to do it to, how to market themselves in the press to assist in the desensitizing of those watching - If they can get away with it why can't we?

    Children used for evil intent. Back then I knew NOTHING about Michael, his warnings, his songs, lyrics, his SUFFERING, but I knew Paris Hilton was suddenly being put in the position and punished for something she didn't understand. I wanted God to help her. I hope he did. I don't know why the Hiltons did this, but I don't believe it was genuinely for Michael. It looks to me very much like a scripted interview and I'm sorry that I feel that way but I can't change it. I wish the photo was not a fake and they were genuine, I do. I don't doubt they may have liked Michael and I hope they LOVED him. But why this?

    There are sections where Kathy is telling the truth, there are sections where you can tell she's lying and she's fishing for what she was "supposed" to say.

    Please don't feel like mashed potatoes. I AGREE WITH YOU that the video was nice to Michael. I never questioned that at all. But wolves in sheep's clothing are mentioned in the Bible and that photo pretty much ruined their interview for me.

    ReplyDelete
  43. @BONNIE : No worry, I'm a small potato but still in whole :o). Seriously, I took nothing wrong, only that at times on some light issues, I play the clown in your Blog : doesn't each Royal Courtyard need their buffon ? :o) Michael & your Blog I treat seriously but some issues ... I liked watching the Video but did also see it was a kind of "mundane" interview. The Hiltons may be nice people but the rich & famous certainly have other concepts of life & business than we may have.

    What you said on Paris Hilton was very nice & true : a young & rich lady (not her fault) a bit spoiled brat but no bad girl I think. You said "children used for evil intent" : that's the point. Also some young people from rich families are thrown into the big showbiz & like sparkling butterflies may get burnt & hurt by the industry & the media : I hope the MJ3 will be spared later. But let's not forget : I read once that the "Paris Hilton" name & constant show-off representation is a big BIZ bringing LOTS of money to the media & to the Hiltons. As you know, in this socialite milieu, BIZ is the keyword. On Michael, the Hiltons' feelings were certainly good but BIZ is never far behind.

    On the photoshop pic, again I'm a retard so whatever you noticed is fine with me. On the wolf in sheep' clothings, I agree : who to trust after so much deception on Michael's name ?

    Bonnie, in spite of my (not very serious) ways to write, plse take life on the good side, take good care of yourself & laugh a max. Do you imagine, "laughing" therapy schools exist in my country : they need to "teach" people to laugh collectively within a group in order to relax because this natural ability seems to be lost in our modern world by many. Crazy ? yes, but if it helps avoiding the sofa of a psychiatrist, why not ? If I could afford it, I would go... but no, I'm crazy enough :o)

    Bonnie, I do wish you & Everyone here a very nice Whit Sunday & Whit Monday ♥♥

    Love

    ReplyDelete
  44. Annonymous said - "The reason I posted was because sometimes you make broad and sweeping statements and I like to look at all aspects so I ask questions to find out. I need evidence not assumptions. "

    ...... Please, if you are going to accuse me of something like "sometimes" making "broad, sweeping statements" please pick one of them and show me an example, otherwise it's just the pot calling the kettle.

    Sarcasm I think is what Line accused me of and I will assume that she meant the statement about the Opthamologist. My mother is a graphic artist and also teaches it at college. There are some things that you just don't need a specialization in to notice with the naked eye. I can't be convinced I don't see something that I see, I don't care what the opposition's title is behind their name.

    Lorlor said - "I wish you well. I'm just inquiring - not judging or attacking anyone. Raising questions and inquiring to learn. "


    There are a couple of your posts that did not make it to the pages of this blog. I don't know where else you have posted or as whom. If you would like me to know you, than please tell so I know who I am talking to. I have had the same problems posting from another computer even though it allowed me to sign in, moderate posts and check stats (which I keep private for a reason).

    I apologize for the sarcasm, but I prefer words to winky faces as they too can be misread.

    Anonymous said - "She said more then something nice - she said he died and she said that she didn't see him as a drug addict which has been edited out of the CNN video link."

    ..... Ah, I knew we would get to it . . . the GIST of this whole thing . . . "she said he died". Was that your point? Since she said Latoya was the one that walked her in, I was waiting for the report on body temperature since she claims she touched every extremity he has from head to toe. Latoya says warm and like sleeping . . . paramedics and bodyguard said noticeably dead, blue and cold to the touch.

    Some here do not understand my "sarcasm" but they have not seen the posts of yours that I deleted. If they knew what you thought about Jesus and his "position" in comparison to the other "gods" you talked about in the one comment I deleted, perhaps they would understand.

    You find my posts fascinating and confusing. That pretty much sums up this whole Michael saga so I haven't deviated from what is being portrayed. Some have eyes to see and ears to hear. I don't know what else to tell you but I wish you well too and hopefully, things will start to make sense soon, because I most certainly can empathize with you on that one! :o)

    ReplyDelete
  45. BONNIE : "Sarcasm I think is what Line accused me of and I will assume that she meant the statement about the Opthamologist"

    Nope ! your general comments only on the Video & the impact on your mood :o(

    From now on, the word "sarcasm" is banned :o)

    ReplyDelete
  46. Oh Bonnie - you don't know who I am - I'm not who you think. I haven't written a thing about Jesus and his position in comparison to other "gods" I don't know what you are talking about here. You have posted - all of my comments - I'm so sorry for the confusion. I apologize for not being able to express what I want to say with better clarity. I also apologize for making an unclear statement at the beginning. Sometimes what you write does seem sweeping (to me) yet I do believe that is my lack of understanding. Not you to blame and no attack. Again, my apologies for lack of clarity.

    No - that wasn't my point with the "she said he died". You and I don't agree on that one subject. That is okay - I'm not attacking you about that, honestly I don't know 100% but I just get a gut feeling he died. I, also, get on some level what you write about - I'm keeping an open mind. I think the fact that she mentioned it at all was interesting - that is all - no great statement. Your earlier posts have got me wondering if she showed up for this interview to push those hot buttons (death and drug addiction). That is all. I am an Episcopalian - raised to Love and Live in the light of Jesus. I have enjoyed reading your quotes from the bible. I'm a novice but I do believe you are mistaken as to who I am.

    Thanks Bonnie - I hope this sort of clears up confusion. Honestly - I don't have any accounts that would allow me to use other then the annonymous - my nickname is LorLor - I hope that helps you. I became an admirer of Michael Jackson after he died - I wished I had been more of one before but that is how it is.

    You don't have to post this - I just want you to know who I am so you don't think I am saying something I'm not.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Line said - "Nope ! your general comments only on the Video & the impact on your mood :o( "

    ....... LOL . . . okay I get you. I'm really sorry. You are right this is NOT worth all this.
    -----------------------------------------------

    @Anonymous - Okay, you're not the multiple gods lady? If that is not you then I apologize. Maybe I should change the settings back so people have to I.D themselves (her posts coincided with yours but on another blog post).

    No! LOL! I don't know who you are! LorLor I have never seen post here before, so I ask if you have posted before, can you tell me as who? I hate breaking up the relationship into different I.D's it gets very confusing.

    You said - "I became an admirer of Michael Jackson after he died - I wished I had been more of one before but that is how it is."

    ....... Me too before June 25th, I really cheated myself in not paying attention. It is amazing the things I believe were important then as compared to now. I am a completely different person, except I still have a problem with trusting people. If you are familiar with the history of this blog and the battles it has had with certain people who were very deceptive you will hopefully understand why I question everything.

    If it makes you feel any better, I do not believe that EVERYONE that says something nice about Michael is bad or suspicious. Just the ones that feel it necessary to "prove" it with a picture that has been toyed with or court documents that have been redacted to death or "punked" to make them look official.

    If I had such a "gut" feeling that he died, it would be better than going through what I go through now, because there would be some PEACE about that thought, ie: he's SAFE. But my gut and several conflicting comments all over the last year and eleven months tell me otherwise.

    Dead or alive, his MESSAGE is still being twisted, manipulated and COMPLETELY misrepresented for an agenda. I keep getting messages and replies that "the truth will come out" and "The truth always prevails". But if the truth didn't need the help of people, then why would Michael have been put here in the first place to GIVE us the message?

    ReplyDelete
  48. Bonnie - (annoymous LORLOR here)Yep - not the multiple God's lady though that would be an interesting moniker. (LOL) I have never posted here before - ever - so I'm a newbie in posting world. I do read your posts and yes I appreciate what you are saying about all of it. Yes - his message is being twisted - people have to navigate the truth - you are doing that - thank you (even when I can't grasp it all *smiling*). I am familiar with the history of this blog, I attempted to write in the best way to be clear that I didn't have a hidden agenda. I'll get better at that. I'll keep reading, learning, discovering and it was lovely to get to know you here. Take care~LorLor

    ReplyDelete
  49. @Line, I just saw your comment you addressed to me. To tell you the truth, my only interest is that she said in the national TV for million viewers “Michael is not a drug addict.” That alone by itself is the most important one to hear someone saying it for millions to hear across the world.

    Truly, I wasn’t paying attention of any of the other interview (even though the TV was on) until Michael’s name was mentioned. Whether they were friends or not is really irrelevant for me. As Bonnie said there are many people came out after Michael passed away claiming to be his friend. I am definitely sure they know each other but to what extent only God knows.

    I am so happy to the point I can’t explain my happiness when she said “Michael is not a drug addict.” You have no idea how many even Michael’s fans believe he abused prescription drugs and he was an addict. It really hurts me to hear this crap even from his fans let alone from others.

    Was she lying about the extent of her friendship with him? Perhaps she might. One lie I definitely know she committed was when she told us the reason why Michael gave his daughter the name “Paris.” You know what I really didn’t even care about that, I just said what is important for me, “Michael is not a drug addict.”

    ReplyDelete
  50. LorLor said - "I am familiar with the history of this blog, I attempted to write in the best way to be clear that I didn't have a hidden agenda. I'll get better at that. I'll keep reading, learning, discovering and it was lovely to get to know you here. Take care~LorLor "

    ......... So will I, at checking for YOUR moniker. That ability to post anonymous is going to pose problems, I see. So sorry I clumped you with two other anonymouses. And thank you for "walking" me through that.

    Grasping it all? This has been a "step program" for me as well. I'm not the conspiracy type. The things that have come to light to be truthful, I have not handled well. I'd have to stop, cry, pray then continue. This is the hardest, most frustrating yet WORTHY journey I have ever taken. It's one thing to fight the enemy or even defend someone else, but when you also are fighting yourself and your own weaknesses at the same time, it gets to be quite exhausting. Doubt and fear are two very vicious weeds you constantly have to uproot.

    It's been a very hard week and I have had a very hard time getting back "in the Spirit". There have been some disheartening things that have happened so I hope you'll forgive me.
    --------------------------------------------

    Mimi said - "You know what I really didn’t even care about that, I just said what is important for me, “Michael is not a drug addict.”

    ....... The Hiltons are not the first or the only ones to say that Michael is not an addict. Others have also said it and oddly enough EVEN THOSE that accuse him of being an addict have admitted they never SAW him using or taking drugs. Only that he APPEARED to be under the influence.

    I listened to that interview and Kathy/Cathy Hilton did also add that "he had trouble sleeping and only needed them for sleep". She also said that she thought that probably escalated due to stress for the concerts and THAT statement I listened to very carefully. I didn't stop listening to the rest of the interview just because she said that. She said some VERY NICE things about Michael and I'm glad she did. But there were some elements slipped into that interview that also made me very uncomfortable - suggestive. I care about the truth. I do not get at all why someone would have to lie to say something positive about Michael. I don't think we should stop looking just because she said ONE thing we agree with. I want to take another look . . .

    I agree, Mimi, it hurts me too to hear 'fans' accuse him of being an addict when he WAS NOT and even people that he PAID TO WORK FOR HIM promoting that garbage.

    ReplyDelete
  51. @MIMI
    Thank you for your reply which I agree with 100%. As you noticed, I wrote to you on the "joke" mode. I admit that for once I was pleased to hear nice words on Michael but I didn't scratch my head that deep into the issue details. Whenever some issues are real serious like Michael's past abusers who stole from him, bashed him & contributed to his demise or many others (as you mentioned) still now displaying false comments on him, then my "joke" mood is instantly replaced by the "warrior" mood.♥

    BONNIE : "It's been a very hard week and I have had a very hard time getting back "in the Spirit""

    Hope next week will get better. We are with you♥

    ReplyDelete
  52. Bonnie said: "It's been a very hard week and I have had a very hard time getting back "in the Spirit".
    Dear Bonnie, I wonder how do you respond to all. You have an incredible force.
    I love you, Bonnie!

    ReplyDelete
  53. I read marc schaffel was gay porn producer do you then why he sued Michael why they fell out or watever??? I realize the producer cut out what mike was saying so make didnt say it but schaffell didnt deny it. silence means consent.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.