Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Michael Jackson Conrad Murray Day 3

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Thursday, September 29, 2011

Michael Jackson Conrad Murray Day 3


Michael Jackson Conrad Murray Trial
Day 3 – Kai Chase Chases Cash





When I would have healed Israel, then the iniquity of Ephraim was discovered, and the wickedness of Samaria: for they commit falsehood; and the thief cometh in, and the troop of robbers spoileth without.  2And they consider not in their hearts that I remember all their wickedness: now their own doings have beset them about; they are before my face.  3They make the king glad with their wickedness, and the princes with their lies.


A Video Made by Jenny Last Night
After I saw Her Tweets (She has a cute voice)


There are days when I see the picture as clear as the type on this computer (with my glasses on) and there are days when it is a bit harder.  On the days that it is harder, I have to keep reminding myself of the research I’ve already put in and trust what God has already shown me.

Yesterday I had some words with one of the posters on my blog and while I do not object to anyone having a different point of view, I do have a problem with people cursing others to hell.  They have since apologized for that and it made me realize how tightly we are all strung and have been over the last two years.  I would like to apologize also for comparing her to Dimond and ask her to understand that I have had my battles with trolls and haters of the Jackson family and I am always on guard.  I don’t always want to be ‘right’.  I am okay with being wrong as long as I am learning that from the truth.

The reason I believe we are all here witnessing all this is to again be reminded of the wages of sin.  There is an ultimate truth and there will be a time when God finally throws his cards on the table and our eyes had better be open to the fact that he had been holding all of the cards the whole time.  The illusion that we have anything to bid will soon be gone.

This trial we are witnessing is not about who goes to jail.  It is about who gets freed out of bondage.  It looks as if Murray is the one on trial . . . but we are.  The trial we are watching is beyond the looking glass.  Murray is the mirage; the reflection in the glass that we don’t know is actually us.  The lies are the bars that keep us in and we are the ones that need to be freed.

This trial is about seeing the truth and there are those watching that are struggling to open their eyes.  As Michael has said in the past, “we need to pay a little more attention to the power of prayer and caring”.

If you feel you are not seeing the truth, then that is the time to pay to prayer.  If you think Michael never went through struggles or doubts, you need to listen to some of his songs again.  His fight cleared a path for us, just as Jesus cleared a path for us to re-establish our relationship with God, Michael tried to reconnect us to the love of the truth.



When Michael asked us to take over for him, when he asked us to cry with him . . . when he asked us not to walk away, not to let go of his hand, he was already aware that he had been chosen for something.  He was just as unsure at one time how this was going to go down as some of us are of who is on Michael’s side.  Michael knew God was going to win and that is what kept him fighting . . . that and the love God gave him for people.

We know God is on Michael’s side, or at least . . . I do.  I was told that in the Bible and I was told that after an anguished prayer one late night in August of 2009.  I don’t deserve to be reminded if I can’t remember that special gift.

I am not the most faithful person on the world.  I have more scabs on my spiritual knees from my stumbles then I can count.  The further along we crawl the more my dreams make sense to me, even if some of you reading have no idea what I’m talking about.  I realized  that it’s not about being able to dump your burdens to get to Christ . . . it’s about being willing to drag someone else’s with you as you continue to crawl toward Him.  You just have to keep going – endure to the end.

There are people that just might happen upon this blog for the first time today.  They will see Michael Jackson’s name and roll their eyes without even reading the contents.

These same people will most likely assume that the media went after Michael for a reason without the knowledge of what that reason was.

They will assume that Michael wanted “to turn white”.  They will assume he was guilty of crimes against children and they will assume that he was a lost, mentally unstable drug addict who was a victim of his fame without realizing that fame is not a noun.  It cannot hurt you in and of itself.  It is an adjective used as a weapon to cover the real culprit behind the crime.  It is the stone that is thrown to hide the hands of those who threw it.

These same people coming to this page will have no problem going out and purchasing or watching a movie made by people who commit the real crimes against our children.  They will have no problem getting behind the wheel of a moving vehicle while inebriated.  They may even be okay walking away with someone else’s dollar through deceit or cheating on their wives, their employers or  their best friends but cannot even give a stranger the benefit of a doubt.

These same people would rather continue to walk past the beaten beggar in the street then risk being seen helping him.  They would rather hide in the crowd as Jesus is beaten, kicked and mocked then risk reaching out to him, not even considering the cross he is carrying was THEIRS.

These are the same people that base the integrity of a person on shape of his nose or the texture of his hair.  These are the people that are on trial.  Latoya is right . . . Murray is the fall guy . . . for every single one of those people, just as Michael was for those who put HIM on trial in 2005.

Lou Ferrigno is not being called as witness, except by HLN T.V.  What he had to say last night was interesting too.  He told HLN T.V. last night that Michael was in great shape only two weeks before his passing.  He told us that Michael was looking to reshape his body and that he wanted to come back as a “new Michael”.

Lou says as he left Michael's house the last time -- two weeks before MJ's death -- Jackson said, "Take care of yourself."  Lou said, "I'm going to see you next week."  Michael just repeated, "Take care of yourself."  Lou feels Michael knew something bad was about to happen.  Source

The “between the lines” are not just in court.  These witnesses outside of court are also talking for a reason.  They bear listening to.

Day three of testimony also revealed some surprising revelations.


Witnesses Alberto Alvarez


I was off and on this computer today (had to make a store run for food) so I jotted down what I could and found transcripts for the rest posted by various sites.

Walgren was finishing up with Alvarez today, left over from yesterday.  More attention was paid to Alvarez since he was the one who assisted Murray with moving Michael from the bed to the floor. He was also the one who testified to Murray asking Alvarez to collect and put away bottles of Propofol before being instructed to call 911.

Alberto Alvarez – Saw 100mg bottle inside saline bag of I.V.  He is the one what called 911 when finally instructed by Murray.

Played 911 tape – sound quality different from operator to paramedic.  Oddly Michael’s name not mentioned by Alvarez, NOR WAS MURRAY’S NAME mentioned on the call by Alvarez.  When Alvarez is asked by paramedic if the doctor saw anything, Alvarez asks “Dr. did you see anything” instead of addressing him as Murray.  A woman’s voice can be heard in background of the call.

Alvarez saw Murray pull I.V. out of his leg . . . no mention of bleeding.  Alvarez then saw Murray put something on Michael’s finger before they moved him down to the floor.

Murray then attached a device in Michael's finger. Brown bag in the bed (later id’ed as Oximeter) not attached to Michael before he was lowered said Alvarez.  Murray took it, attached it to Michael.  Alvarez asked what that was and Murray said it was something like it was a monitor, as Alvarez testified.

Alvarez said Faheem arrived at the room, Alvarez approached him, told him "It's not looking good". Murray asked "anyone knows CPR?" -

Murray proceeded to do mouth to mouth.  Paramedics moved Michael to the foot of the bed (on the floor).

Alvarez testifies that tabloids offered him money for stories.  Financially wiped out because of his involvement in MJ’s death is what he says. 

Paparazzi following them, they wanted to protect Michael's privacy. He went towards paparazzi, "this is a private moment, please step away".  Murray told Alvarez "thank you for your help" Alvarez asnwered "We did our best".

Left the house early, he took the Jackson's dog (a labrador) to Hayvenhurst.

They break to cross examination by Chernoff.  During that time I check tweets.

ArsenioHallOfficial tweeted: “They are trying to tell me MJ was playing "possum" ... then he woke up and SELF administered the chemical that took his life?!” 


Chernoff cross exam of Alvarez


Chernoff is challenging that the bag Alvarez says he saw has not milky substance in it.  Alvarez says “yes".  Chernoff testifies to difference between his testimony at the preliminary hearing and today, saying his testimony has become “more interesting”.

Donte_Jackson Tweets http://dontejackson13.tumblr.com/post/10812987873  Photo.  Why he is tweeting this during the trial I don’t know, but I don’t disagree with him.


Alvarez testifies to Chernoff questioning about talking to children and walking them out of the room out into the foyer when Paris followed Prince upstairs.  Alvarez says that Paris is on the floor curled up, crying and Prince is just standing there.

After removing the vials, Murray told him to call 911.  12:20 pm. Alvarez calls 911.

Chernoff asks Alvarez “it seemed surreal didn’t it?  Like it wasn’t happening”.  Alvarez answered “it was something I wasn’t used to.”  I thought this was a very odd question and not at all helpful or valuable to either defense or prosecution.  However I did get something out of it.

Chernoff kept questioning each of the security staff, including Alvarez, of why they didn’t call 911.  It is apparent that the one first notice Michael’s condition, Dr. Murray was the one there and responsible.  Perhaps they will ask him if he ever gets on the stand.  This was pointed out by various Twitter participants.  Opportunity to follow up on questions was not exercised.  Chernoff is not well liked judging by tweets, but his phrasing of some of his comments are rather interesting.

During break Donte_Jackson posted this:

After noon break Chernoff resumes cross with Alvarez

On June 25th, Alvarez didn't say anything about the IV bag to police officers.  Chernoff pointed out that the first time he did was the preliminary questioning on August 31st, 2009.

Alvarez testified that the first time he saw the picture of the IV bag was in 2011, at the Prosecution's office.

Chernoff: "You think you might be mistaken?" Alvarez: "No chance"

Alvarez is saying they put Michael on the floor during the 911 call .  Alvarez gives an example of how he held the phone to his shoulder with his chin as he helped lower Michael to the floor while talking to the paramedics on the cell phone.  It doesn’t sound believeable.

Someone gets kicked out of the court room for their phone going off.  Hope it was press.

Alvarez stammering about when he realized he should call and report that he touched a bag that may have had Propofol. He then called Williams.

Alvarez says he has not been able to get consistent work since appearing on T.V. as being involved in Jackson Case.

Chernoff pressed him about how he made it to Michael Jackson’s security detail.  Alvarez explains  that he worked for about six months in 2004 in Beverly Hills, then was relieved.  In 2007 in Las Vegas for a few months then he wasn’t needed anymore.  In 2008 through Michael Amir for two to three months and was relieved again.  In February of 2010 he also worked for the Jackson family for only two months, after repeatedly calling the house to check on the children.

When asked by Chernoff how this happened, Alvarez testified that between November and December of 2009 he discussed getting a job with the Jacksons when he called to ask how the children were doing.  Why didn’t Chernoff ask him why the Jackson’s let him go?

Alvarez was finished shortly after they returned from Break.


Kai Chase is called by Prosecution

Kai testified to being with the children in the downstairs foyer watching paramedics then security take steps two at a time.  She said the children were with her, holding hands in a circle and praying.  Missed some of this questioning by Brazille (sp?) because I had to run to the store for my husband, but I caught a lot of the testimony in the cross examination.

Toward the end of Brazille’s questioning I heard about the numerous media interviews Kai Chase granted.  I had seen some of  them back in 2009 and early 2010.

Surprising, she earned approximately $7,000 through different foreign media outlets for interviews.  Chase testified that they were all foreign media outlets, seven total at approximately $1,000. Paid to her from each one.  She did not seem embarrassed that she accepted payment (first witness to admit to doing so) and when asked, Chase testified that they were shows that focused on her cooking expertise and the love that was in Michael’s house.

I caught a bit of disingenuous over-explaining when trying to justify that she did it because “Michael is loved all over the world”.  Brazille asked Chase if she expected t o get rich granting interviews about working for Michael Jackson and Chase replied “no”.
 

Chernoff cross with Chase:


Chernoff verified information Chase gave in response to her paid interviews and the happenings of the morning of June 25th.  He then began questioning her in regard to why she didn’t attempt to contact security when Murray first requested help.

She had only Michael Amir’s number.  She could not contact anyone else including Michael Jackson directly.  She said with her, everything went through Michael Amir Williams.  She said children let her in on the a.m. of 25th. She made them breakfast. They ate without their dad.  She testified that Michael came down approximately twice to three times a week to have breakfast with his children and that him not coming down on the morning of the 25th was not an unusual occurrence.

She said 12:05 she saw a panicked Dr. Murray – he said go get help, go get security, go get Prince.  When asked how old Prince was Chase replied that Prince was about 12 or 13.  She then ran in to get Prince in the Den.  She said to Prince, “Prince, Dr. Murray needs you,  there may be something wrong with your father”.  Prince went with Dr. Murray.  Chernoff does not ask her why she would assume something was wrong with Michael and why she would say that to a child without knowing what was wrong.  I would have been all over this.

She can’t recall seeing Prince go up the stairs. She then went back to work preparing lunch.  She did not get security as Murray had asked.  Wow, her answer made NO SENSE as to why she didn’t attempt to get security even though Murray asked for security. 

Her answer was that Prince was in her eyesight.  When Prince was sent to Dr. Murray, she did not get security.  That is a biggie considering she testified to Murray being panicked and wide-eyed.  This was confirmed between 12:05 and 12:10. 

Chernoff asks her three different times why she didn’t get security. One answer she gave was that she didn’t want to take the risk of security not being present.  I guess finishing lunch was more important.  This really made me angry.

Ms. Brazil declines to recross.  (Why?  Who are these people working for?)

Kai Chase is excused.  Court adjourns for the day.


The After-Reports on HLN:

As everyone leaves, Hanoi Jane on HLN jumps on Murray but no one questions Chase’s cashing in on interviews, the fact that she testifies to Murray’s panicked, wide eyed requests for help and for SECURITY and Prince . . . so Kai gets Prince and goes back to making lunch?  Her explanation on cross examination?  She didn’t want to take the risk that Security would not be in the trailer?  What risk?  Lunch would be late???

Some other tweets from those watching after Chase’s testimony:

Charlie Thomson:  “What on earth is the point of this exchange? Is he suggesting she intentionally didn't get security as part of a murder plot?”

Gatorgirl277 (aka, Nikki) – “Come on Flanagan, Chase didn't know that MJ was dead upstairs or she'd never have called Prince over to the stairs...”

My Replies:  @gatorgirl277 Murray asked for Security, why didn't she get them? Lunch more important than Michael?”

And “@gatorgirl277 $7k in fees for interviews for Chase . . . She's the only witness thus far cashing in. Bet you're proud!”

Seems those involved in those fan groups who are used to making money since Michael died think its okay that Kai Chase did the same. I smell a common bond.

How is what she did any different than what Michael’s PREVIOUS house help did to him during 2005?  Because she didn’t say he was a bad guy?  She went on the road, talking about Michael and his children and their household habits for money before the trial.  Just because it was FOREIGN PRESS doesn’t make it any less opportunistic. There were others who were happy to talk about the goodness of Michael without the exchange of cash.  That did rub me the wrong way, especially considering that she hadn’t worked for Michael all that long AND she couldn’t bring herself to get security like the “frantic, panicked, wide-eyed” doctor had asked her to.

HLN’s Jane is ignoring the fact that Murray did not JUST ask for Prince, he asked for Chase to get security which she neglected to do.  Aside from continuing to make lunch which no one ate, perhaps she was too pre-occupied with her plans to cash in on interviews further down the road?

Raymone Bain was again interviewed on HLN (is she an employee now?)  She said something today that made me laugh out loud.  She said in London a member of the press, who they thought originally was a fan, handed him a printout of the lyrics to Michael’s song “Morphine” and asked him “are you hooked on Demoral?” 

Raymone said that Michael walked away shaking his head and looked at her.  Raymone said, “Michael said to me, ‘if I was hooked on drugs why in the hell would I sing about it?’”

I could see Michael’s face and hear the tone of his voice the way she described this, so I just had to post again, Michael’s song “Morphine” which is the second song on his “Blood on the Dance Floor” album.  Remember we covered this previously here:  Source ,  and some of the lyrics on this video are misquoted.

Morphine

Why is HLN completely ignoring facts in exchange for the sensational sale of grieving children?  Seems the press wants another crucifixion and it’s only day three of the trial.

Yesterday, I told Susanne I would post some documents with Michael’s legal last name on them from the 2005 Trial and the 2003 complaint.  I had a copy of the birth certificate . . . but wonders, now I can’t find it.  These should do.

Susanne . . . It ‘s in Jermaine’s book that Michael’s name is NOT Michael Joe Jackson.


2003 and 2005 Legal Documents
Death Certificate - Note spelling of middle name
and his address listed as Hayventhurst Drive
He had not lived their since 1988

2005 Ammended Complaint April of 2005

 2003 Original Complaint Filed Against Michael on File at Findlaw
 2004 Toxicology Report for 2005 Trial
Note the Name, his height and weight





Have we learned anything from 2005?  Or did we just exchange Michael for Murray?  I can’t see that he would be happy with this familiar pattern.

We are about to fail another test.  I can’t believe it.



33 comments:

  1. WHOA! What an incredible blog, Bonnie! I'm only half way through it and have to go to bed and will finish tomorrow. But I wanted to post a comment on this quoted section below because it stood out like a glaring WHAT THE...?

    "Chernoff asks Alvarez “it seemed surreal didn’t it? Like it wasn’t happening”. Alvarez answered “it was something I wasn’t used to.”

    Bonnie, you thought it was an odd question by Chernoff, and you're right. In any trial proceeding, this question would have received an immediate objection by the prosecution and sustained by the judge for LEADING THE WITNESS! I can't believe no one caught this! (Uh, Michael...hee-hee!)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Spotlight said - "In any trial proceeding, this question would have received an immediate objection by the prosecution and sustained by the judge for LEADING THE WITNESS!"

    ........ Why is no one else saying anything about this on Twitter? What are they afraid of? (what are you afraid of, Michael asked...)

    I could have missed other possible things like this because I couldn't be TIED to the computer, but that was a good one.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bonnie, I am unable to follow the trial so I am extremely thankful for you covering what you can as well as you usually do. I hope your headache is better!

    I am off on tangents tonight. I looked up Michael in my dictionary. Do you know that Sept 29th is Michaelmas? The feast for the archangel Michael - one of the four quarter days in England.

    Also, because of the Michael serving up Pepsi in that pic in Jermaine's book I've had his Pepsi Dreams commercial on the brain. Have you ever seen this? I ran across this over a year ago and I don't think I've ever sent it to you.

    http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=11251

    This was also and interesting take on the same commercial:

    http://anthony-king.com/blog/michael-jackson-performing-who-is-it-and-our-pepsi-and-mj-conclusion/


    Just some interesting stuff. I know you're extremely busy so file this away for now. It will surface when things are ready.

    Bless your eyeballs, you furiously typing fingers and your sharp brain cells. God only knows how you do all this! (I'm sure He's right there with you!)

    Hugs!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oops, here I am again.

    I forgot to mention, my search for the Pepsi commercial on your blog turned up "Show me the way - a short allegory of things to come"

    What a lesson in patience! Oh for that day to arrive - Michael would call it BLISS and it will be!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Bonnie. Words of wisdom and so true what you wrote on today's blog. But I think those who need to read and understand the first part of your blog post are not even interested of this blog or MJ. Sometimes I tend to talk a lot. And when I am finished talking , I start to think and go like, did I say that? What was I thinking? I apologize again for saying that I wish Joe will burn in hell. I dont want nobody to burn in hell. Just the thought that an adult would lay a finger on a child makes me mad and upset. And therefore I over reacted. I am sorry for that. IV in the leg? Is it not supposed to be in your arm or on your hand? Thank you for the apology. Diane Diamond is/was on MJ's black list. She is not a person you want to be compered with. She is not nice. At MJ's first anniversary there was a documentary called last days I think. And the first and last person you see in this documentary is her. On his anniversary. In the end she says something like, It's hard for the family and its difficult for the fans to accept, but Michael Jackson was a drog addict. Susanne

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Bonnie. It's sad when you think about Dr.Murray's cute little son. He may lose his father for a couple of years. And that is like forever when you are 2-3 years old. Susanne

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bonnie,
    Well the questioning of Alvarez by Chernoff just seemed totally amateur and pointless! He floundered and was directionless - why did nobody in the media comment on that? If he was trying to discredit Alvarez as a witness, he totally failed, so what WAS he doing? If he'd been my attorney I would have had to restrain myself from jumping up and saying 'what are you doing man? I could do a better job than you!'. If he continues like this then the prosecution are going to walk all over him. Seems like he such a rookie at the job, he is making silly mistakes and getting reprimanded by the judge! I thought of your blog post where you had to leave the computer due to fits of laughter!

    ReplyDelete
  8. BONNIE said : "Latoya is right . . . Murray is the fall guy."

    First, the first part of your Blog was GREAT, I loved it too !

    La Toya : hope you did not take me wrong yesterday as I actually agree with La Toya' declarations. Just found that parts of her past interviews, book & Twitters might possibly endanger her. Maybe I exxagerate. After all, the Jackson family never made any mystery on their assumption favouring a "foul play" from the very start.

    Yesterday I read the last chapters of Jermaine's book although I'm not that far in reading. Heartbreaking despite the fact : since 09.14.2009 Jermaine only heard external reports about the TII set's atmosphere. So I am anxious to read your detailed comments on those chapters in due course.

    Key Chase : charming, seductive, good cook certainly but I do not trust her either. Her not calling the Security is shocking. For a few weeks interval of her employment, Chase did not work at the Jackson residence because of a disagreement over the terms of her contract not meeting her financial requirements : money-money. Could she have been eventually infiltrated ? I try not to think that far but who knows ?

    The security guards & personal assistant to Michael are key witnesses but I still wonder : were they only regular employees unexpectedly (to them) plugged in the tragic event or possible small "tools" to bad guys pulling the strings from behind ? I'm getting paranoiac by seeing conspiracy everywhere !

    As usual, I gave my opinions on everything but in fact know nothing :o(

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hey Bonnie. I don't understand why MJ didn't use his real name on the childrens birth certificates? Do you? Susanne

    ReplyDelete
  10. Blake said - "I hope your headache is better!"

    ............. So far so good! (praying it stays away for a while). Hey I will look at those links, thank you! I've seen his pepsi commercial. I love the one with the little kid sneaking in while he's playing piano. Reminds of of the pic with him and lil' Prince at the Piano with Debbie Rowe in the background with baby Paris. Furiously typing fingers. ROFL! When our friend from Maryland was down visiting he used my computer to send an email to his wife (instead of calling? hee-hee!) and he couldn't type because I have no letters on my keyboard, LOL! (I can actually type, with my whole hand, no looking) He made ME sit down and type this email to his wife while he dictated. Funniest thing I ever heard of. Yes Michael is here with me. I'm looking at his face right now. He's on the background of this blog, LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Blake said - "I forgot to mention, my search for the Pepsi commercial on your blog turned up "Show me the way - a short allegory of things to come"

    ...... Oh, that song of Styx that I found, I had never heard it before that day I wrote that. I just loved the message and you know, they are another musical group that were trying to wake people up but they had lots of conflict in their history.
    --------------------------------------------

    Susanne said - "Is it not supposed to be in your arm or on your hand? Thank you for the apology."

    ......... You're welcome and thank you for yours. I understand Joe probably because my stepfather is a lot like him (was. Bob passed away back in 1992). I don't agree with what I have HEARD that Joe did, but I am also learning that MUCH of what Joe did was also embellished in the press. At the time Michael gave his Bashir interview he was in a precarious position and surrounded by very bad people.

    During Michael's Oprah interview, remember Latoya was already under Gordon's control and being threatened with the death of her brother and sister Janet if she didn't malign Michael in the press . . . the very same COULD HAVE (and I believe it was) going on with Michael. Michael knew that Latoya was separated from her family and Michael could have been told she would be killed if he didn't say things about Joe.

    Now Jermaine does say in his book that Joe used a switch (from the tree) and a belt, and he also says there were times it wasn't fair, but that is what parents did back then to correct their children . . . MINE INCLUDED. I don't like it, but I don't think it makes Joe evil. I don't agree with using object to hit children, but that doesn't mean I think Joe is evil. I also do not agree with letting anger dictate your child's punishment . . . THAT is when things get out of control. When you let anger get between you and your child, the punishment is not going to fit the crime, ever. Correction and punishment are two different things.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Susanne said - "It's sad when you think about Dr.Murray's cute little son."

    ........ We know so little about Dr. Murray and his personal life. It was different with Michael being maligned in the press. Michael started off his celebrity being everyone's sweetheart. Murray began his celebrity as being the man who killed everyone's sweetheart. He never had a "good" period so no one cared about Murray's life story. We don't even know if Murray's reported lifestyle is true. It's been reported that Murray has five kids from four different mothers or something like that. True? I doubt it.

    On Diane Dimwit Dimond, she needs to face the fact that she knows absolutely nothing about Michael and get her fractured mentality off our t.v. sets. Nobody cares what she things. Until I heard her talk about Michael I had no idea Beelzebub had a sister.
    --------------------------------------------

    Princess Glam said - "I would have had to restrain myself from jumping up and saying 'what are you doing man? I could do a better job than you!'. If he continues like this then the prosecution are going to walk all over him. Seems like he such a rookie at the job, he is making silly mistakes and getting reprimanded by the judge! "

    ............ Yeah but you know what? Prosecution is making the same mistakes, only they're not getting called on it. Niether side followed up with Alvarez on why the Jackson family let him go after only two months (I'm assuming they still need security? Especially now?) and neither followed up sufficiently on contradicting timelines of phone records between Murray, Paramedics and the security team/Williams.

    Chase's testimony yesterday? I would have been all over her about why she didn't get security or ATTEMPT to, and why she made the interview rounds. Someone above made a good point about her contract dispute which I neglected to mention (because I was away from the computer during that part of the testimony.

    See what transpires today.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Line said - "Just found that parts of her past interviews, book & Twitters might possibly endanger her. Maybe I exxagerate. After all, the Jackson family never made any mystery on their assumption favouring a "foul play" from the very start."

    .......... This is exactly why I turned down interview offers. There were a couple of people I talked to but when they didn't seem to be on Michael's side I would jump to expose them on this blog. The trouble is, not ALL those people were actually bad, they just weren't sure who I WAS and where I stood because there is so much deception out there. Anyhow, it's best I just stick with the blog.

    I will definitely get to some of Jermaine's book this weekend. I'm on page 250 . . . very interesting. Some very funny/cute things in there too, like Jermaine's getting pulled over by a traffic cop and being teased about his voice. And I don't understand why they pick on their voices anyway . . . Did you ever hear CHRIS TUCKER TALK??? Michael's voice is deeper than that but they pick on Michael's? Chris Tucker's voice has the effect of a dog whistle!

    I suspect a couple of the security and I suspect Chase as possible infiltrators. I am beginning to see why Tohme fired everyone even though I suspected last year Tohme was actually a legitimate protector. We shall see.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Susanne said - "I don't understand why MJ didn't use his real name on the childrens birth certificates? Do you?"

    ......... Well, I'm not convinced those birth certificates are real . . . if Michael's has been blocked what makes you think they would let the children's be exposed? Someone probably faked them and didn't think to check what Debbie's real name was.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Instead of wondering why Kai Chase didn't get security, the real question is why didn't Murray call 911.

    Did you miss the testimony where Alvarez said that he was offered $200,000 from the Enquirer, and $500,000 from an overseas outfit? Kai Chase was not paid anything for her American interviews, and only about $1,000 each for her foreign interviews, which took time and preparation on her part. She's a working woman - she can't afford to give endless interviews for no compensation. If she wanted to cash in, she could have scored a fortune making up bs for the tabloids.

    We've heard repeatedly that Michael's children were very mature and intellectually advanced for their young ages. It's been said that Prince Jackson ran the household - when Kai Chase was hired, Prince and Paris interviewed her, not Michael, and they asked her to accompany the family to London. It probably seemed appropriate to KC to get Prince. Everything happened within a few panicky minutes. It's easy to judge someone harshly after the fact.

    ReplyDelete
  16. BONNIE said : "Did you ever hear CHRIS TUCKER TALK???"
    No but I will search separately.

    BONNIE said "I suspect a couple of the security and I suspect Chase as possible infiltrators."

    On my side I would suspect Williams a/o Mohammed (but good point for them as both refused to let Murray return alone to the residence). Alvarez was tense yesterday but seemed OK : what do you think ? A pity for him he retained a capital info in 2009 before he finally talked : fear of retaliation ? Alvarez still suffers on the job side : injust in case he did nothing wrong. Chase not calling immediately the Security ? fishy, or except for paid interviews, is she always that slow ? Maybe all 4 are finally innocent of any wrongdoing. Where is the truth in all this ?

    Bonnie, I stop for today as you have enough in the pipeline...but I'll be back tomorrow. Take care.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Bonnie Hi, I just wanted to say that there are a lot of lies that are coming out in this trial. For instance...the famous ambulance picture.Now proven on national T.V. to be a fake. According to the paramedic Michael had a tube down his throat and his eyes were still open.The picture shows an oxygen mask and eyes closed. Pay attention to details,the media lies will be found out.Something else that has been bothering me are the abundance of oxygen tanks.But no tubing or masks for them to be used has been mentioned.Were they just opened up to be let into the air? I believe these are a prop.To make things "look" a certain way.Peace.Linda

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous troll said - "Did you miss the testimony where Alvarez said that he was offered $200,000 from the Enquirer, and $500,000 from an overseas outfit? Kai Chase was not paid anything for her American interviews, and only about $1,000 each for her foreign interviews, which took time and preparation on her part."

    ...... Well if you look at the OTHER DAYS I reported on you will see where I did include Alvarez's information. If Kia can't afford to give interviews for free, maybe she should not have given any? I don't have a job, I make NO MONEY and I'm reporting for free so your argument is invalid.

    Judging harshly after the fact? There is a man on trial, medical license revoked. So far I have seen two liars who have already testified against Murray - Chase and Alvarez. All information gets reported. Should Murray have called 911? Sure. but ANYONE WITH A CELL PHONE can do that. If Murray is NOT THE ONE who gave Michael the lethal dose, then someone else DID.

    It's only day four. If you don't like me pointing out the discrepancies then get your news from Nancy Grace.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Hypocrisy alert:

    Anon said - "We've heard repeatedly that Michael's children were very mature and intellectually advanced for their young ages. It's been said that Prince Jackson ran the household - when Kai Chase was hired, Prince and Paris interviewed her, not Michael, and they asked her to accompany the family to London."


    ..... Well in that light I guess it's okay with you for Sony and Branca to put the children to work since they are so mature. I am aware the Michael did an amazing job raising and teaching his children, but I don't see how sending Prince upstairs to watch his sister balled on the floor screaming is going to help the doctor any, do you?

    ReplyDelete
  20. NOTE - I'm not putting up with any trolls. If you cannot read what I wrote before commenting I am not posting your comment. Chase or anyone else LYING is going to get reported here.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Line said - "Alvarez was tense yesterday but seemed OK : what do you think ? A pity for him he retained a capital info in 2009 before he finally talked : fear of retaliation ? Alvarez still suffers on the job side : injust in case he did nothing wrong. Chase not calling immediately the Security ? fishy, or except for paid interviews, is she always that slow ?"

    ......... Okay . . . Williams testimony I am okay with. Mohammed seemed rather calm but not emotional enough for me. Alvarez seemed more emotionally "correct" but his testimony was laid to waste today by Seneff's observations (first responder, paramedic). I will have this up tonight.

    Michael was wearing a surgical cap supposedly when Seneff got there but not in the hospital gurney pic (fake photo?).

    Alvarez testified to helping Murray get Michael from bed to floor while holding phone talking to paramedics, yet Seneff testified that Alvarez and Murray were still in the process of lifing Michael off the bed when he came in the room. Alvarez testified to taking the I.V. out of Michael's leg after moving him to the floor, but Seneff said Murray did it when they moved Michael from the floor on the far side of the bed to the floor at the foot of the bed. . . .lots of descrepancies.

    Chase should have gotten security as asked. If Murray was panicked, wide-eyed and frantic according to her when he asked for SECURITY FIRST then for Prince, she damned well should have gotten security, EVEN AFTER GETTING PRINCE! Prince can't drive! Geeze!

    ReplyDelete
  22. Bonnie Good For you! A lot of lies!!!It's time to finally hear the truth.Sometimes what's good for you hurts. The fact is,even if you only have half a brain,you can see the liars.They're not very good at it.Peace.Linda

    ReplyDelete
  23. Linda said - "For instance...the famous ambulance picture.Now proven on national T.V. to be a fake. According to the paramedic Michael had a tube down his throat and his eyes were still open.The picture shows an oxygen mask and eyes closed. Pay attention to details,the media lies will be found out.Something else that has been bothering me are the abundance of oxygen tanks.But no tubing or masks for them to be used has been mentioned.Were they just opened up to be let into the air? I believe these are a prop.To make things "look" a certain way.Peace.Linda "

    ......... Thank you Linda . . . I will just repost what you posted because I agree with you whole-heartedly. So far we have the Prosecution presenting it's case (and so far they've provided more defense for Murray than the defense). I can't wait for the defense to begin presenting it's case.

    We have to remember that this is not "the Jackson's" vs. Murray . . . this is the people of the state of California vs. Murray. None of these lawyers work for the Jacksons, so keep that in mind. The Jackson's are learning some of this just as we are. So they are probably just as shocked to hear some of this evidence as we are.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Question: Why would prosecution use a fake photo of Michael on the gurney?

    ReplyDelete
  25. BONNIE said : "
    Alvarez testified to helping Murray get Michael from bed to floor while holding phone talking to paramedics, yet Seneff testified that Alvarez and Murray were still in the process of lifing Michael off the bed when he came in the room."

    By concentrating to follow in spoken English the long testimonies of A. Alvarez yesterday & R. Senneff today was a good language exercise to me but obviously I failed the test with Alvarez on the road :o(

    Defense lawyer Gourdjian : offensive, efficient but with an evil profile...which was to expect from which past Law firm or S-bunch he comes from.

    Good Night Bonnie. Dont get too angry, spare your energy : it is only Day 4 !

    ReplyDelete
  26. Spotlight said "Bonnie, you thought it was an odd question by Chernoff, and you're right. In any trial proceeding, this question would have received an immediate objection by the prosecution and sustained by the judge for LEADING THE WITNESS!"

    Actually that's not true. I'm taking a trial prep class this semester and we just learned that leading is allowed on cross-examination. However, leading is NOT allowed under direct examination. The prosecution questions of Alvarez were direct examination so leading was not allowed. The cross-examination was by Chernoff so leading was allowed.

    I do agree though, it was a totally weird question to ask.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Spotlight said "Bonnie, you thought it was an odd question by Chernoff, and you're right. In any trial proceeding, this question would have received an immediate objection by the prosecution and sustained by the judge for LEADING THE WITNESS!"

    Actually that's not true. I'm taking a trial prep class this semester and we just learned that leading is allowed on cross-examination. However, leading is NOT allowed under direct examination. The prosecution questions of Alvarez were direct examination so leading was not allowed. The cross-examination was by Chernoff so leading was allowed.

    I do agree though, it was a totally weird question to ask.

    ReplyDelete
  28. hey Bonnie, do you have your approval setting turned off?? I keep trying to post but when I click "post comment" after typing in the word verification, the comment disappears without leaving the confirmation that used to appear... "your comment will appear after it has been approved"

    Anyway, hope you get this but if you do that means you'll get the other comment I posted 20 times...LOL

    ReplyDelete
  29. @Deb - Yes, I have to moderate these posts or I will be overrun by trolls. It's been like that since late last year. I'm covering the trial so if you don't see your post right away it's because I haven't moderated yet.
    ----------------------------------------------

    Deb said - "However, leading is NOT allowed under direct examination. The prosecution questions of Alvarez were direct examination so leading was not allowed. The cross-examination was by Chernoff so leading was allowed."

    ......... Ah . . . thank you. Good info to know. So we will not beat up so much on the protocol for whoever is cross-examining. :o)

    ---------------------------------------------

    Line said - "Defense lawyer Gourdjian : offensive, efficient but with an evil profile...which was to expect from which past Law firm or S-bunch he comes from."

    They all come from the same club, don't they? None of these people are actually working for Jacksons this is state vs. Murray.

    Save my anger? For what? Got to release or boil over. Vents are working and oiled. LOL!

    Alvarez has now been contradicted by two paramedics.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Interesting info:

    Senneff did not recognize Michael - testified to surgical cap, extremely thin, cool to the touch.

    Blount: did recognize Michael immediately, mentioned nothing of surgical cap, didn't mention weight, said warm then cool to the touch, but believed he had been dead for longer than a minute.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Bonnie,did you notice the pillow that Michael was laying on in the pictures? Somebody must have fluffed the pillow and ironed the pillowcase just prior to taking the photo.Peace.Linda

    ReplyDelete
  32. Is Alvarez stupid?? I just dont understand why he would say such a stupid lie KNOWING the paramedics would contradict him. Its just all so silly. I dont understand right now.
    Also... Kai Chase even said she had a phone on her as she used it to check the time for her cooking. So she had a phone.. why not call 911 or at the very least call the security guy she had the number for. Is she stupid?? Who goes back to cooking lunch after the doctor makes such a panick-stricken request.
    And what the hell was the nanny doing letting Prince and Paris up to the room?? And no-one has even mentioned where and what Blanket was doing???? Was Blanket invisible that day, or something??? No-one ever talks about him or his reaction to what was happening.
    OMG... and one more thing... what the heck is Karen Faye doing on twitter right now?? To tweet anything during this trial about Michael is down-right disrespectful. She should just put her iPhone down and be quiet. Urgh!! Isnt she a potential witness still?? They mentioned her in Kenny Ortegas testimony so i am guessing she could still be called by the defence. Is the woman totally stupid to be on twitter?

    ReplyDelete
  33. Linda said - "Bonnie,did you notice the pillow that Michael was laying on in the pictures? Somebody must have fluffed the pillow and ironed the pillowcase just prior to taking the photo."

    ........ I saw it in the closeup but it didn't register. I was too busy trying to figure out how to spell all those medical terms! I wonder if there is a site to look at all the exhibits?
    -----------------------------------------

    @Monika - You have some very good and valid points! Yes, I agree, Alvarez was discredited today by two paramedics, but then Senneff and Blount's testimony didn't exactly match either as far as where Michael was on the bed when they arrived, where the IV was and who took it out, who moved Michael from bed to floor, etc (if this is even Michael!)

    Children = Where was nanny? What was Kai thinking? Where was Blanket? Very much I agree with this.

    Karen Faye from what I heard is not being called nor is Tohme which I find very VERY ODD.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.