Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Jermaine and Piers Morgan, Michael and Estate Executors

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Monday, September 19, 2011

Jermaine and Piers Morgan, Michael and Estate Executors

Things I Notice about Jermaine’s Piers Interview




Interview Part 1

00:00 – Don’t laugh.  I know this is barely into the interview, but I notice a few things already.  One, Jermaine looks really good for a 56 year old guy.  I stopped that interview at 0 seconds because Jermaine is looking at Piers Morgan sideways.  I don’t know why, I just noticed it.

At 0:07 seconds Jermaine tells Piers he didn’t talk to Michael that much during rehearsal but the last time they (family) saw him was May 14th, 2009.

(This means that every bit of information about Michael after the 14th and before the time they arrived at the hospital was from OTHERS NOT MICHAEL)

0:15 After Morgan asks Jermaine if he knew how long Michael had been taking Propofol, Jermaine answers that there was a lot of footage taken out of “This is It” that people never saw.  He said, “The edit before the edit”.  I will get to that in a minute.  (Not trying to rhyme, LOL).

(He doesn’t really answer this question directly, opting instead to mention the missing footage.  Now if Jermaine was not there for rehearsals how would he know there was a lot of footage taken out?  Again from “others”?  Who did the ‘edit’ before the ‘edit’?  Perhaps Sony didn’t get all the footage?  This is very telling.

I can tell you that the TII footage that was released online after Sony bought the rights looked a lot different than the footage AEG released to the News stations of the last night of rehearsal.  It did not look like the same Michael.  I know lighting changes, I know makeup changes, hair, clothing but I’m with Jermaine on this one.  I want to know how a healthy man could lose so much weight in (according to Lou Ferrigno) three weeks and according to Jermaine in six weeks.

We covered stills on Michael using the liquefy tool on so many of the pictures put out on the internet by TINI thugs. This is how that works:


How to lose weight using photo shop

The elementary version of how DeGosson was
Added to all the celebrity photos . . . including Michael with
Talitha, with Joanna Thome, Taaj Malik with Randy, etc…
This is how it’s done




And below is a step by step showing the frames as they edit them and thin out a seal swimming in the water.



Basically what you can do in photo shop you can also do to video, frame by frame.  I was able to spot some of the error though and I cover those here - Source and Source where I show the different Michael’s all supposedly filmed in the same three days.  I know I covered all this last year but some new readers have not see this.  Back to the Piers Morgan interview:

0:30 Morgan asks Jermaine if that footage would be damaging, was there a man walking around in a daze, what is the stuff “we didn’t see”.  Jermaine starts to answer that “these are the things that we noticed”, and he goes on to explain that the defense is going to try to paint Michael as a drug addict and that it wasn’t true.  He further explains how can someone be dancing and singing since 2008 and be dependent on drugs (and notice body damage from long term abuse did not show up on autopsy but Jermaine does not bring this up here).  Jermaine instead includes in his answer that Michael was practicing four hours a day, he had a five year plan and he was going to start a new life. 

(I was thinking about the “five year plan” in 2008 and Michael’s “four years to get it right” speech.  Just as I was writing this, Micheline sends me this in the email.  We were thinking this at the same time!)

"How could Michael have been a drug addict when in 2008 he was dancing four hours a day, and had a five-year plan about starting a new LIFE."  In 2008 it was a 5-year plan.   In 2009 Michael gave that speech on stage and said we have 4 years to get it right.  Could the 5-year plan Jermaine alludes to in 2008 be the same plan that Michael is referring to a year later in 2009?




0:53 – Morgan interrupts Jermaine in mid-sentence (I kinda wanted to hear the end of Jermaine’s thought process there…) by asking Jermaine to consider an experience a friend of his had with sleeping pills and he himself with pain for cracked ribs. 

1:25 – Morgan is still explaining that the Ambien he was on is “strong drugs” and goes on to explain that Propofol is even stronger.  Jermaine shifts in his seat and sort of ducks his head down.  I can’t really read his face, but he could be thinking the same thing I am thinking at this point . . . Propofol is not addictive and Propofol is not a pain killer.  So I continue to watch.  Jermaine blinks a couple of times, narrows his eyes and has a slight pull to the sides of his mouth.  I don’t want to say it is a slight smile but if I was going to be anal about this I would say it was a slight smile.  Watch his face.

Morgan explains that with Propofol Michael could appear to be functioning but inside it is causing damage (again no organ damage in autopsy). 

2:17 – Jermaine states that Michael always had an anesthesiologist around him and he has lived all his life with having that, and taking demorol for pain (he doesn’t say it was for intermittent pain and didn’t take it 24/7 but that’s how people will interpret this) and then points out that he never at any time had problems forgetting which way to turn or forgetting his lines, etc.  When Morgan asks Jermaine if he saw Michael like that, Jermaine says, “No this is what others have said that were around him” and at 3:06 Jermaine does crack a smile while trying to describe a Michael that can’t even lift himself up but then his brows immediately draw together in a pained expression. 

All this information he got from others.  You can see the rest of the clip here and a short one on his first time meeting Dr. Murray.  Source

In another clip which I did not include on here (because it was so short and is accessible on the link above), Jermaine is describing his first time meeting Dr. Conrad Murray.  He describes the room in the hospital with his mother next to him and Murray across a table from him.  Jermaine mentions that he gets strange feelings about Murray (yeah?  The guy is six foot-forever!  I’d feel funny too!).

The first thing I notice about that part of the interview and granted this clip is very short – is that Murray is supposed to have fled the hospital to avoid signing a death certificate and couldn’t be found.

In the book (the excerpt that someone put online), Jermaine supposedly went to the hospital room, held Michael’s hand, opened one eyelid etc, but in this interview he is describing sitting in a room with Murray across from him.  Was this before or after Michael is declared dead?  And why would Murray sit with the family?  Just when was it that Murray supposedly fled?

In Latoya’s book, she talks of confronting Murray after Michael passed.   Was that before or after this scene that Jermaine describes in the book?  Does Jermaine even mention this confrontation in the book? (I don’t have the book yet, I am just asking…)

The interviews in print, such as the one in "Musicroom" I don’t put too much stock in because they can more easily be taken out of context, misquoted or completely falsified.  The televised interviews are more easily deciphered because you can see edit breaks and read people’s expressions.  What they didn’t show sometimes says more than what they did, and you can piece together what they didn’t show by the way it was edited and where in the conversation it was edited.

Micheline had sent me an article that professed to quote from Jermaine’s book.  It was worded though, like Jermaine had given an interview (which he may very well have, but I don’t recall seeing that on his twitters).

The article didn’t have any information that I wouldn’t find in the book, but at the bottom of the article was links to another interesting piece of information:


Estate has Lloyds of London Policy?  Fresh!

According to this article, Estate executors are trying to get Lloyd’s of London to cough up the claim money:

The row over Michael Jackson’s millions of dollars he left on his death has taken a dramatic new turn.

His estate are going to war with his insurance company over a $17.5 million payment.

Further down it says, “But Lloyds has asked courts in Los Angeles to declare the policy null and void, claiming Michael – who passed away from acute Propofol intoxication in his rented Los Angeles home – had lied about his medical history and drug use.”   Source

I’m a bit perplexed because according to Branca-bloggers Justice4nobody, TruthvsLies, MJgoodwitch, Tee_storm and tstorm, Nikki-gatorgirl, David Edwards and those people, AEG had the policy.  They swore up and down that AEG’s motivation for pushing Michael “to the edge” was this insurance policy they expected to cash in on?

Now the estate has the policy?  How did that happen?  Their whole case about AEG cashing in on his death went out the window just on that insurance policy alone.

Their other claim was that AEG put a clause in this insurance policy that insured Michael in case of an overdose.  Now Lloyd’s of London is not paying based on that same theory of drug use and medical history?

Wasn’t it Branca’s bloggers and TINI who were perpetuating that myth throughout the online fan forums in the first place?

Excuse me for a minute, I have to leave the room for a quick second . . . be right back . . .

(ROFLMBO – LOLOLOLOL – ROFLMORE – LOLOLOL – HEE-HEE-HEE – HAW-HAW – LMBO – CAN’T BREATHE – HEE HEE – sniffle – wipes eyes – slaps knee and holds belly – recovers – comes back in room)

Eh-hem, sorry but I had a lil’ emergency, but we’re good.  It’s good now.

Branca, you guys suck at chess.  You can’t even keep track of your OWN moves, LOL!  Checkers may even be a bit too challenging for you.  How about Old Maid?  Or the game MEMORY!

How in the world did you expect to cash in on a policy while at the same time perpetuating the tabloid rumors and paying your TINI thugs to regurgitate drug addict rumors all over the MJ fan community?

How does it feel to walk into your own snare?  That’s a bit embarrassing isn’t it?

It’s funny but even last year, I was under the impression that if “TII” was sold to Sony, that meant the insurance involved with that was included . . . it’s like the transfer of a warranty when you sell a used car (sorry Michael, you are not a used car, I know, okay?).  But then it would go to Sony.  Michael Jackson was now the property of the estate . . . so it would make sense that the insurance policy would also transfer over or at least it may have been a request on the part of the estate executors.  If this was in conjunction with TII though, why does the estate and not Sony have this policy?

At least, if this is true, this is proof that the Estate and NOT AEG has this insurance policy.  This renders moot any motivation or arguments to that effect on the part of AEG trying to kill Michael for the insurance policy OR the catalog, because the letter of agreement did not say AEG would get the catalog upon death, only upon breach of contract or non-completion of the contracted concerts (remember, we have not even seen a contract yet, only the letter of agreement).

This also further proves that AEG was NOT in a position to profit from Michael’s death. The only entity that would are the ones now controlling his music, his likeness, his trademarks and his catalog . . . SONY AND ESTATE EXECUTORS BRANCA AND MCCLAIN with WEITZMAN representing Michael’s children against Miss Katherine.

While this does not absolve AEG of wanting to profit from Michael’s shows, I’d like to know how that is any different from what Sony and Branca have done to Michael over DECADES.

Look at the people that helped paint this picture of a drug-addicted, sickly and incompetent Michael using their corporate media and press.  Look at all the organization that went into what was done to Michael!

You will see a lineage that goes all the way to the Order of the British Empire (sir’s McCartney, Sony’s  Stringer, Goldman, Lehman, the Monarchy and the Rothchild-owned banks).


Rothschild and the Music Industry





Low-level thugs exit first. Yes, that's you folks on the bottom of the elitist pyramid.  No, "they don't care about" you either.


Healthy Michael
Real Michael before Photoshop



34 comments:

  1. Bonnie,Hi...Linda here.I've just been watching,listening,learning.Something I came across today that everybody might be interested in hearing.The interview is an hour long,but you won't be disappointed.Even fits in with Michael's timeline. divinecosmos.com/podcast/Wilcock_Fulford_2011-9-14.mp3
    Peace.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bonnie said "It’s funny but even last year, I was under the impression that if “TII” was sold to Sony, that meant the insurance involved with that was included . . . it’s like the transfer of a warranty when you sell a used car (sorry Michael, you are not a used car, I know, okay?). But then it would go to Sony. Michael Jackson was now the property of the estate . . . so it would make sense that the insurance policy would also transfer over or at least it may have been a request on the part of the estate executors. If this was in conjunction with TII though, why does the estate and not Sony have this policy?"

    I did not understand it this way. Not being a lawyer myself, my view was that it would only have transferred to Sony IF Sony had taken over as concert promoter at some point before 25 June 2009. The cancellation policy (if the one on the net is genuine) covered BOTH AEG Live and The Mark Jones Company (Michael) for Specified Costs, Expenses and Committments. Sony did not pay out any of these initial costs, AEG and/or Michael did, so they are the assurers.
    The estate have the policy because Michael (as Mark Jones) was a named assurer, and therefore the estate want their money.
    I do agree with you though, they can't use their cronies to run around saying Michael was on drugs and then fight Lloyds because Lloyds refuse to pay due to drugs! Besides, I think the REAL point of Lloyds refusing is that there was a condition that Michael had to undertake a second medical in London, and that obviously never happened. You can't argue against that fact.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Linda said - "The interview is an hour long,but you won't be disappointed.Even fits in with Michael's timeline. divinecosmos.com/podcast/Wilcock_Fulford_2011-9-14.mp3
    Peace."

    Linda, you're Bibilical, right? This guy teaches that there is no Messiah, that "we are God" and that is right along the lines of the false religion/new age Illuminati religion. Like a lot of these guys, they appear to expose the "lie" of the Illuminati while promoting their false religion at the same time.

    This is exactly the stuff we have to be careful of. Thank you for the link and I'm sorry if you watched all that to show me. I have seen Wilcox's stuff and that is exactly why I put him in the "Illuminati" can. He and that guy with the UFO club I just covered a couple of days ago . . . Greer - false prophets.

    ReplyDelete
  4. PrincessGlam said - "Not being a lawyer myself, my view was that it would only have transferred to Sony IF Sony had taken over as concert promoter at some point before 25 June 2009."

    ...... I used to sell insurance/life insurance and although I didn't sell life to any CONCERT promoters, you don't just TRANSFER a policy for life insurance. It either has to be signed over or the person has to die, or the person who is Insuree cancels the policy (not the insured necessarily).

    This means AEG would have had to willfully sign it over because as you say, they were the ones that laid out the money (that some speculate Michael would have had to pay back out of his concert profits).

    While we dont' know the particulars on that deal, you are right in that a "concert" no longer existed so the policy should have just been paid out to AEG, but this didn't happen. There was speculation in the beginning that this policy was actually cancelled before Michael passed - which again is speculation. Could the the "other" policy you surmised could have existed. But the executors now have this policy and the executors are not the ones who laid out the premium for this policy nor was Michael as was our understanding . . . so why does Branca have this policy and not AEG?

    The "second physical" do not make it to this article as a reason payout is denied, but the drug issue . . . I'm amazed Branca and his partners in crime didn't see that coming.

    There is also the possibility that this whole article is bogus and none of this happened . . . stay tuned. (ugh) :o)

    ReplyDelete
  5. To Princess -

    Where I said "...... I used to sell insurance/life insurance and although I didn't sell life to any CONCERT promoters, you don't just TRANSFER a policy for life insurance. It either has to be signed over or the person has to die, or the person who is Insuree cancels the policy (not the insured necessarily)."


    .....By "transfered" I mean you don't just transfer a policy to a new beneficiary without the payor signing off on it. AEG would have had to do this willingly or the estate would have had to request this and AEG agree to do it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. To Princess - I'm aware of the typos in the first reply and I know it reads like crap but this is what I get for trying to half-edit a reply on two hours sleep. Me going to bed now.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bonnie said "But the executors now have this policy and the executors are not the ones who laid out the premium for this policy nor was Michael as was our understanding . . . so why does Branca have this policy and not AEG?"

    Well I think they BOTH have a copy of the policy, as both Michael (Mark Jones Company LLC) and AEG Live were assured. From my understanding, Lloyds have already put their case to AEG as to why thay are not paying them. Now the estate is after Lloyds for their share (Michael's share).
    I think there is a lot of confusion over these insurance policies. This AEG/Mark Jones policy was NOT a life insurance policy as I understand it, it was a cancellation policy. I think there may have been a life insurance policy for Michael already knocking about, and I heard rumor that the premiums on this had not been paid for a few years and it was cashed in. Pearl Jr keeps referring to the AEG/Mark Jones policy, and life insurance policy in the same breath, but I think they are completely separate. This has just added to fans' confusion.
    I do not know how the AEG/Mark Jones policy was to be split between them, but yes they are both named and therefore both will have copies.

    I know that the second medical is not being covered by the media, only the point about Michael taking medication and seeing a doctor, and not declaring it, but then what do you expect from the media Bonnie? This just shows how they latch onto the most salacious/newsworthy part of the objection by Lloyds. Added to that, wasn't Murray supposed to have spoken to an insurance rep on the morning of 25th June, and discussed Michael's health? Isn't that declaring he was seeing a doctor, if true?
    LOL I did see your typos but still understood what you were saying perfectly!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bonnie,Thanks for the info. Only thought it was relevant because of the "earthquake",there's a lot of talk about it being a nuclear bomb underground. Today I saw an article about a sinkhole behind some houses in Virginia very close to the actual site of the "epicenter". I am definitely "Biblical",and do not believe "we are God".Peace.Linda

    ReplyDelete
  9. Bonnie,just one more thing.I was more referring to what Benjamin Fulford was talking about on the subject of the nuclear bombs. Peace.Linda

    ReplyDelete
  10. Princess Glam said - "Well I think they BOTH have a copy of the policy, as both Michael (Mark Jones Company LLC) and AEG Live were assured."

    ........ Wrong. We need to make up our minds here. If it is not a life insurance policy then why would it be payable upon death? A cancellation policy is QUITE DIFFERENT as it would be paid upon the CANCELLING of a concert. In this case if the person DIED the policy would just have been canceled itself not paid out because the concert was not canceled due to willfull withdraw by one party or the other.

    Since the very beginning this has always been described as a life insurance policy. What changed? And Pearl Jr.? Does SHE have a copy of this policy? If so, maybe you should ask her how chummy she is to the estate executors to get a hold of that and the information on it. Who was it that put out the information that Mark Jones was the insured? TEAM BRANCA. It certainly wasn't AEG or Michael's family.

    As far as I know there is no such thing as a concert cancellation policy because any cancellation OTHER THAN DEATH of the artist is usually taken up in lawsuits. If there were there would be no point in holding an artist's assets hostage.

    This was a life insurance policy. In EITHER case, you NEVER write up a policy for each beneficiary to have a copy. There is always one copy with beneficiaries listed on it. It is the same policy with the same number.

    There is also no such thing as AEG trying to collect on the same policy as the Executors. It would have had to have been signed over. I could not tell you when this would have been done, but it would make SENSE for the policy to be signed over when the DEAL WAS DONE for "TII". Why? Because a life insurance policy is a CONTRACT in itself between the INSURER (LLoyds) and the POLICY HOLDER (originally AEG). The INSURED was MICHAEL/OR MARK JONES AS MICHAEL, not AEG.

    The POLICY HOLDER (AEG) agrees to pay an agreed upon amount to the INSURER (Lloyds) for indemnity of the INSURED (Michael/Mark Jones) to the BENEFICIARY (which can be whoever AEG designates, including themselves).

    Michael cannot be the beneficiary since he is the insured (Michael cannot receive funds upon his death).

    There WAS NO ESTATE EXECUTOR before Michael died, therefore the policy could not have been transferred BEFORE he died because there WAS NOBODY TO TRANSFER IT TO . . . meaning Branca and the others had no relation to Michael.

    Since AEG initiated and BOUGHT this "contract" between the insured and themselves (the policy holder) only AEG has the POWER to sign this policy OVER or change beneficiaries.

    Remember where we got this early information from and who people like Pearl are consorting with. AEG probably never tried to cash out the policy. Don't you think LOL would be filing charges of their own if Branca tried to put in a claim for the same policy if AEG also tried to put in a claim?

    I see where the story is now trying to be changed so that they can keep AEG in the "guilty" loop. You're smarter than that Princess. Pearl Jr. has her connections and they are not with the Jackson family.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Princess Glam said - "Added to that, wasn't Murray supposed to have spoken to an insurance rep on the morning of 25th June, and discussed Michael's health? Isn't that declaring he was seeing a doctor, if true?"

    ........ Again where did this information come from? Was it from actual court transcripts or more "insider" press suggestions?

    Even if Murray WAS talking to an insurance company, was it LOL or their agent? And we still have not established that Murray was working for AEG because there is NO SIGNED CONTRACT. Only a contract PLANTED on Michael's bed UNSIGNED BY MICHAEL OR AEG but signed by MURRAY ONLY.

    The reports in the press say that Michael insisted on having this doctor. The press reports that AEG apparently didn't like this doctor but agreed to Michael's demands.

    Yet neither party in part to Murray working there signed the contract EVEN SIX WEEKS AFTER MURRAY HAD ALREADY BEEN WORKING . . .

    We can't say that Sony hired Murray because they were not in the picture until TII footage was sold to them, and Branca didn't make the scene until June 17. Doesn't make sense that Michael wouldn't have signed the contract and it also makes no sense that Michael would have left something like that just laying on his bed.

    We know TINI has been after AEG even before Michael died (letters and press releases ready to go the day he passed, deals with multi-billion dollar corps for web site and advertising, coverage on CNN). For a bunch of stalker fans, that is quite a feat don't you think?

    What doctor would work without a contract KNOWING the risk he was putting himself under (if he was indeed going to sabotage Michael's health at the bequest of another) for six whole weeks?

    That PLANTED contract is key and so is the fact that Murray was working for six weeks supposedly without a SIGNED contract giving him some assurance that he would be paid.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Linda said - "Only thought it was relevant because of the "earthquake",there's a lot of talk about it being a nuclear bomb underground. Today I saw an article about a sinkhole behind some houses in Virginia very close to the actual site of the "epicenter". I am definitely "Biblical",and do not believe "we are God".Peace.Linda"

    ........ That's what I thought. Yes the info on the earthquakes was interesting. This was also reported in Russian news outlets. Now how would Russia know about underground detonations and not us poor citizens? I posted that last month I think when we had the earthquake on the east coast ("Did ya FEEL it"?)

    sinkhole? We have one of those in our backyard, but small and it's way in the back.

    There has been information put out also that nuclear detonations were also what brought down the towers (the only thing that could have melted the steel). Thermite? Not sure if that is the same thing. I'm no chemical scholar.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hi Bonnie. I don't understand the defence reasoning that if they can prove that MJ was frail then Dr.Murray will be a free man. Doesn't it make him even more guilty, giving MJ a large dose of propofol and then leave the room. IF MJ was frail and Dr. Murray was aware of it, shouldn't he as a doctor be even more careful and professional when treating him and give him propofol? What do I know? I am from another planet. Susanne

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hi Bonnie. This is off topic. Have you watched George Carlin - We are Equal on YouTube? Now and then we need a good laugh to get some strenght to carry on. To all the comedians around the world: - I love you! And I know that often there is a lot of pain underneath your talent! Susanne

    ReplyDelete
  15. Ambien is a sleeping drug.

    ReplyDelete
  16. @Princess - I just answered my own question:

    "We can't say that Sony hired Murray because they were not in the picture until TII footage was sold to them, and Branca didn't make the scene until June 17. Doesn't make sense that Michael wouldn't have signed the contract and it also makes no sense that Michael would have left something like that just laying on his bed.

    We know TINI has been after AEG even before Michael died (letters and press releases ready to go the day he passed, deals with multi-billion dollar corps for web site and advertising, coverage on CNN). For a bunch of stalker fans, that is quite a feat don't you think?"

    ...... Sony WAS in the picture before TII footage rights were sold because AEG would have had to purchase agreements with Sony - license for Michael to perform his songs (Sony still had control of these until July of 2009)

    Murray began working there six weeks prior to June 25 about Mid April. AEG would have had to contract with Sony for licensing to get permission to use Michael's songs (sick isn't it?). This would have to have been done before they began rehearsing obviously.

    It is possible that Murray could have been sent in or planted by Sony, but there are stories that Murray actually treated Michael's children for colds and such (which I doubt because Murray is supposed to be a cardiologist) . . . HOWEVER, Murray's wife (or exwife, depending on where you get your info) is a PEDIATRICIAN in Nevada.

    Could Sony have gotten to Dr. Murray? Why did Murray go to the estate to get paid if AEG is the one that hired him?

    That's all I have for now . . . brainstorming.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Bonnie,
    Thanks for this! The policy signed over to the estate? - yes that makes sense now. One of the reasons Lloyds has refused to pay is that they believe that AEG or The Michael Jackson Company have assigned their rights to the policy to the estate of Michael Jackson, without written consent. I was taken aback when I first read this, as nobody had mentioned it before, and I didn't understand the implications.
    For the record, I have not believed AEG was 'guilty' for about 18 months now. I'm thinking the big S is behind this with help from an Itslian?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Susanne said - "I don't understand the defence reasoning that if they can prove that MJ was frail then Dr.Murray will be a free man. Doesn't it make him even more guilty, giving MJ a large dose of propofol and then leave the room."

    .... Yes, good point. It wouldn't make a difference if Michael was ill or not. He still administered the drugs and seemingly very irresponsibly.

    And if you are from another planet, tell me which one it is so I know where to go when things get too messed up here! ;o)

    Yes, I've seen George Carlin. I agree with him but I don't like his language. :o) He's no longer with us either.... :o( He comes across as a jerk but he's really not.
    --------------------------------------------

    Anonymous said - "Ambien is a sleeping drug." Yes but apparently Piers didn't know that even though he said he was taking it for cracked ribs. Funny. Perhaps that's why Jermaine was trying not to smile.

    ReplyDelete
  19. PrincessGlam said - "One of the reasons Lloyds has refused to pay is that they believe that AEG or The Michael Jackson Company have assigned their rights to the policy to the estate of Michael Jackson, without written consent. "


    .......... Well it doesn't work that way. An Insurance agent would usually have to make that change and in person. At least I had to. If a grandparent for example, was insuring a grandchild and they wanted to sign their policy holdership to the parent, an agent would make the changes and bring the policy with the new changes out for them to sign, just like signing over title to a car, only the agent has to make the change on the policy.

    The policy cannot be surrendered (if Whole or Unverisal life) for three years. It's called a "lock in" period.

    Then there is the transfer or signing over the assignment which is a method of transferring of all benefits and rights under a life insurance policy to another person or institution including as security for repayment of loans.

    This could very well be how the estate executors/Branca were able to talk AEG into transferring the policy to the estate, because of Michael's loans, which half are probably bogus.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Princess - To assign the policy, the policyholder has to notify the Company. Assignment has the effect of nullifying the nomination in the policy. Assignment is not permitted in case of Retirement plans.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Princess - Sorry one more thing (Life Insurance can get complicated), I forgot to mention that the agent does not actually have to be present, but they do have to be notified and a form has to be filled out notifying of the change so it can be entered.

    Assignment or transfer of a life insurance policy may be made by making an endorsement to that effect in the policy document too.

    Another way of transferring or assigning the life insurance policy is by getting a separate assignment deed executed. The former case is a preferred mode of assignment as it is exempt from further stamp duty.

    The assignment form needs to be filled and signed by the Policyowner, Assignee and a Witness.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Oh my God Bonnie and Micheline, you guys are smart. You are right when Michael said, “we have 4 years to get it right.” It has to be about his life he planned 5 years ago but said it one year later. That’s it.

    That’s right Bonnie, Jermaine shouldn’t said, “Michael always had an anesthesiologist around him and he has lived all his life with having that...” I was perplexed when he said that. It sounds really means he was taking this Popofol all the time, which is not the case. Do you think this statement he made is damaging for the prosecutors and a winning one for the defense?

    Mimi

    ReplyDelete
  23. Good research 'Bonnie'. I no longer believe that MJ is 'with us'; based on the info you've presented here, it seems that 'evidence' is pointing, more and more to Sony/TM and 'others', a 'hit' was committed. Which is sort of what I've felt all along. Poor, darling, sweet Michael....; [

    ReplyDelete
  24. Mimi said - "That’s right Bonnie, Jermaine shouldn’t said, “Michael always had an anesthesiologist around him and he has lived all his life with having that...” I was perplexed when he said that. It sounds really means he was taking this Popofol all the time, which is not the case."

    ........ Well, let's not take this out of context . . . Jermaine also said this is the info that others gave him. How would Jermaine know first hand about Michael's propofol? Michael was estranged from the family. Jermaine himself said that he hadn't seen Michael in eight years . . . so we have to really listen to how he phrases these things.
    ------------------------------------------

    Annonymous -

    Why would the info I presented testify to Michael not being here? All we have is an insurance policy that the insurer refuses to pay out on. It's a piece of paper.

    I have a life insurance policy. Does it prove I'm dead? No. :o)

    ReplyDelete
  25. Hi Bonnie. Have you seen this two videos: "Beyonce pledges allegiance to Satan!" And "Jay-z subliminal message - Lucifer 9 reversed. In the Beyonce Interview she is doing the devil sign x number of times during a performance. I have also seen her doing the pyramid (Illuminate) sign. I guess she learned that from her dear husband. In the Jay-z video you hear a message from one of his backmasked songs. It says: "Murder Jesus 666". MJ and Beyonce was friends and he loved her, right? So this don't make any sense. Maybe its an anything for money kind of thing. But does Beyonce and Jay-z really need to do anything for money? They got talent so what is the need for that? What are they trying to do and why? And would MJ had loved Beyonce if she and her husband was a part of an Illuminate sect? In an Interview Jay-z says that he doesn't believe in Christianity. Why is he then wearing a Christian cross in some pictures of him? Susanne

    ReplyDelete
  26. Hi Bonnie. I saw a picture of a skeleton laying on a computer desk, ha ha ha. That was funny! You must have done A LOT OF RESEARCH!!! Or at least your husband thought so. You seem to have a husband with a good sense of humour. That's good! And you are welcome to my planet when things get too messed up. I Will send you a map. Susanne

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anonymous said - "Have you seen this two videos: "Beyonce pledges allegiance to Satan!" And "Jay-z subliminal message - Lucifer 9 reversed."

    .......... Gasp! NO!!! I have seen neither one. When I was researching MK Ultra, Monarch and the music industry, I had seen references to those videos but I didn't watch all of them.

    Not everyone that wears a cross is Christian or Christ-obedient. It's just a piece of Jewelery to some people. Madonna is not Christian either, she is Cabala but she wears them or she used to.

    - On the skeleton picture, yes, that has been a running joke in my family. My brother visited last month and BOUGHT ME a nic-nak of a skeleton on the computer. But he went one better. He shrunk a picture of one of Michael's album covers and glued it to the little computer, writing the word "conspiracy" underneath it.

    ReplyDelete
  28. @Truthbtold - Is this you on Twitter?

    @truthbetold777

    ReplyDelete
  29. Hi Bonnie. Jay-z is doing the pyramid sign with his hands all the time. He also has a clothing line with the pyramid (Illimunati) sign on Shirts and stuff. He said he is not into Illuminate. So I guess that the Illuminati sign don't mean anything to him. He just thinks the sign looks cool. He is wearing a cross but he doesn't believe in Christianity. He probably just think the cross looks cool. Maybe he is even wearing the hitler cross too now and then. Just because it looks cool. Jay-z you are SO COOL wearing all those signs that means nothing to you. NOT! Susanne

    ReplyDelete
  30. @ Susanne - ROFL!!! You had me laughing out loud on that one. You're cool! LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  31. Bonnie, I found this article about Dr. Murray’s upcoming trial on USToday.

    http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2011-09-20/michael-jackson-trial/50483088/1?loc=interstitialskip

    What caught my eyes is one of the thing that Brian Oxman listed from suspicious evidence that the defense will use, which is unidentified fingerprints that is found on the syringe. Is this an imagination the defense put out or is there another person’s fingerprints found for real?

    Mimi

    ReplyDelete
  32. Hi Bonnie. What does ROFL and LOL mean or stand for? I am from another planet remember. I just saw that you have like 300 members. Jesus Christ!! What if all of them would make comments on your blogposts. Then the skeleton picture wouldn't be a joke anymore. You would have to be awake 24/7 to give 300 or more comment answers every day. Maybe you should write a book someday. A book with all your poems. So the whole world can enjoy them. I hope you didn't mean that you think that I am as cool as Mr Jay-z. Susanne

    ReplyDelete
  33. Mimi said - "Is this an imagination the defense put out or is there another person’s fingerprints found for real?"

    ....... I found a lot of interesting information in there . . . notice that all of the people interviewed for this were either from TINI or previously fired lawyers. Nobody from Michael's family or their lawyers. Don't you find that odd?
    --------------------------------------------

    @Susanne -

    ROFL means rolling on the floor laughing. LOL means Laughing out loud.

    300 subscribers isn't much. I've seen blogs with a lot more than that. Not everyone wants to register with Google for an account so some of the commenters here are anonymous. I get, depending on the day of the week just under 2K readers a day. It's neat to see where in the world they all come from. (Please don't say Jesus Christ like that . . . sounds like you're yelling at him ♥).

    I can't write a book about this . . . I promised. That's why I do the blog. The poems though, except for the ones about Michael . . . the ones I have about faith I could probably publish one day.

    LOL, no, not as "cool" as J-Z Hee-hee! That was funny.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Hi Bonnie. I am sorry about that. Wont happen again. I love Jesus. And he will be in court every day during the trial. Susanne

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.