Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Michael Jackson, Sony and Madonna

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Michael Jackson, Sony and Madonna

Michael Jackson, Sony and Madonna
The CIA and the Drug Trade – And a lil’ Bit O’ Hope



Part One of this blog is at this link here – Corruption Beyond Michael

SONY AND MADONNA – SONY’S MUSIC CATALOG?  REALLY?

Another DAME (oops, I mean SIR) Howard Stringer and Madonna (another Kabbalah thief) is involved in some of their own dirty dealings. 

In 2005, Sony illegally dove headfirst into my Copyrighted Catalog without permission, that contains 12,000 songs, 300 movie scripts and short stories, 15 book manuscripts, 200 music video treatments, 500 photographs, 150 photo treatments, a perfume line and clothing line. They illegally passed it around to Sony's music and film artists and writers, who knowingly infringed my Copyrights and routinely visit my websites (before and after the infringements occurred). They criminally received an illegally made copy of my Copyrighted Catalog, procured through hacking commissioned by Madonna, whose lawyer, Robert Jacobs of Mannat Phelps, is also in charge of Sony's music catalog (Madonna has a side distribution deal with Sony).”   Source

Is this the very same “Sony/ATV” music catalog?  Or is this a separate catalog?

Let’s zoom out and take a look at the bigger network picture.

Your Government, Pedophilia and Beastiality

Sent to me from Vanessa:

The two are accused of "immoral and indecent" sexual acts involving a 6-year-old child, according to information from DeKalb County Magistrate Court and an arrest warrant.

The bestiality charge says Lindsey "did unlawfully perform or submit to any sexual act with an animal."

The alleged incidents took place between January 1, 2010 and August 22, 2011.
”  Source

Yes folks, apparently these people have nothing to do while your tax dollars are paying them to work for you, so their uninspired minds take to victimizing not only children but animals.  Of course since Hollywood has been trying to normalize sex with children for years, I take it bestiality is next so that government “officials” can keep their jobs when press like this crops up.

This is worse than the Barney Frank “D.C. Call Boys” scandal.




CIA and The Drug Trade

From Cathy, this will tell you why the war on drugs is really the war on citizens.   The founder of Skull and Bones was involved in the Opium trade.

CIA Drug Trade,


Back to the Music Industry and our Government

No wonder Quincy Jones was reported as saying he didn’t understand why Michael wanted to be white, or called him a drug addict.  He was on Sony’s Payroll (grandfathered in from CBS).  Yes, he and Bandier and Mottola and Stringer all one world –order puppets, happily tag-teaming all the good-ole-boy meetings.


MJ 2011 Quincy Jones WEF 2004



Above is Quincy Jones attening World Economic Forum in 2004 in DAVOS/SWITZERLAND, 21JAN04 - Quincy Jones, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, The Quincy Jones Listen Up Foundation, USA, takes off his ties at the entrance of the Davos Congress Center during the Annual Meeting 2004 of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, January 21, 2004. Copyright by World Economic Forum swiss-image.ch/Photo by Andy Mettler  Source




Uganda and Barack Obama

I spoke to our friend in Uganda last night.  He’s a missionary and he had messaged my husband to let him know that the troops that Obama is sending over to his country are gather youth together and teaching them to riot.  He went offline immediately after he began asking my husband not to vote for Obama, so I don’t know if his internet was disconnected or not.

In the discussion it was learned that Uganda’s president is pro-life, and is not open to changing his policies to give control to world government organizations.  He said Obama’s troops (this is YOUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS, PEOPLE) are being sent over to teach Uganda youth to riot against the government . . . just like in Egypt and Libya.  I did a search on the news to see if this was true under President Museveni’s name and this is what I found:

Youth Stand Up Campaign?  This actually began in February 2011.

The current electoral process is considered by many to be relatively peaceful compared to 2001 and 2006 elections. The politicians and the media have however reported a number of electoral irregularities, including; having a biased Electoral Commission, internal rigging of elections within political parties, denying opposition politicians access to the media, voters intimidation and training of youth military brigades to antagonize the electoral process.

On the other hand, there’s growing frustration among the youth due to;

  • High unemployment rate among both the educated and uneducated youth
  • High level of poverty in Uganda where more than 25% of the population live on less than one U.S. dollar per day.
  • Rampant corruption that has widened the gap between the poor and the rich
  • Miss- guided colonial education system that produces job seekers instead of job creators

Funny . . . What is Obama doing over in Uganda, organizing youths to riot with demands like these, when this is exactly the problem we have in OUR COUNTRY right now?

This could be the REAL reason . . .

Obama’s Billionaire Friend Soros Interested in African Country’s Oil. Source

Please pray for Uganda and the other countries that are suffering under invading, foreign rioters.



Yes, This Makes Sense, Doesn’t it?


Wallstreet Protesters getting paid
Who’s Paying them?

THIS is an intelligent interview
About what the protest is, even though
She was a little flustered.

Jesse Ventura Supports Occupy Wall Street
In Minneapolis

Despite some rogue troublemakers wanting to show up and give you a bad name, PROTESTERS PLEASE  . . . Remember what this is about.  Humanity.  Exhibit honorable behavior . . . ignore the bad behavior from people paid to make you look bad.


FactCheck.Org

Cathy sent me this information.

All you have to do to lend an air of credibility to your lies is add the word “fact” to your name, get funded by a front organization camouflaged in an American University and claim to be “bipartisan”.

FactCheck.org is funded by this group:

Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania

"The fact is, the ANNENBERG Public Policy Center (APPC), the sponsoring agency behind FastCheck.org, is itself supported by the same foundation, the ANNENBERG FOUNDATION, that Bill Ayers secured the 49.2 million dollars from to create the Chicago ANNENBERG Challenge “philanthropic” organization in which Barack Obama was the founding Chairman of the Board for and Ayers served as the grant writer of and co-Chair of for its two operating arms.Source

Apparently Obama worked for the annenberg foundation in chicago prior to running for president. Bill ayers was in on it too.  Source

Although the press has been notably lax about pursuing the matter, the full story of the Obama-Ayers relationship calls the truth of Obama’s account seriously into question. When Obama made his first run for political office, articles in both the Chicago Defender and the Hyde Park Herald featured among his qualifications his position as chairman of the board of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, a foundation where Ayers was a founder and guiding force. Obama assumed the Annenberg board chairmanship only months before his first run for office, and almost certainly received the job at the behest of Bill Ayers. During Obama’s time as Annenberg board chairman, Ayers’s own education projects received substantial funding. Indeed, during its first year, the Chicago Annenberg Challenge struggled with significant concerns about possible conflicts of interest. With a writ to aid Chicago’s public schools, the Annenberg challenge played a deeply political role in Chicago’s education wars, and as Annenberg board chairman, Obama clearly aligned himself with Ayers’s radical views on education issues. With Obama heading up the board and Ayers heading up the other key operating body of the Annenberg Challenge, the two would necessarily have had a close working relationship for years (therefore “exchanging ideas on a regular basis”). So when Ayers and Dorhn hosted that kickoff for the first Obama campaign, it was not a random happenstance, but merely further evidence of a close and ongoing political partnership. Of course, all of this clearly contradicts Obama’s dismissal of the significance of his relationship with Ayers.”  Source  And Source

Michael and “Hope”

Cathy also sent me this:

Announcing the Debut of the Jackson 7 (I love the music on this site by the way).  You remember the “Jackson Seven” right?

A collection of seven exquisite signed giclee prints by artist Patrick Whelan representing works acquired by the late King of Pop and art aficionado Michael Jackson is being offered on a limited basis to the public as of November 27th, 2009. Additionally, all of the net profit will be donated to "Make-A- Wish Foundation" charity in honor of the entertainer's own immense contributions to art and to culture. And also to help carry on the spirit of his efforts towards easing the pain and suffering of children from around the globe.”  Source

Now this should not be a surprise because this was posted in 2009.  However the eighth thumbnail at the very bottom is not a painting, but a link to a piece of paper image of a transaction.  The link to it says this:


 Click on the link and you will see the transaction.

Why would AEG purchase paintings for Michael?  This wasn’t rent on a house, it wasn’t a tutor for the children, security, travel expenses or expense for a doctor . . . this was for ART!

Does this sound like someone that was trying to kill Michael?

This reminded me of the secret hanger where Brett-Livingstone Strong secretly kept Michael’s artwork for almost two decades.  My first question was, did AEG make this transaction for Michael for the same reason?

Second question – Why now?  Why would that link appear on that site, worded THAT way?  Why was it important to know WHO wired the money for the purchase?

Third Question – There are seven paintings.  Seven.  Why these paintings, and what do they mean?  (Okay that is more than three questions).  I bet there are answers here . . . .


Michael’s One True Love

It’s not Brooke Shields, it’s not Princess Diana (although she came close) and it’s not Lisa Marie.  It’s not even music.  Music was the tool in which to spread the message.  Michael said it “comes from above” . . .

Cathy sent me this one too (she’s spamming me!  Thank you! LOL).

Michael’s One True Love – God

2011 Poem Back of Painting at Neverland


The handwriting of the poem found on the back of the Picture at Neverland.

I dream of you at night
You whisper in my ear
I wait for you in silence
Yet still you wont appear
I still can feel you with me
Even though your far above
I love you so completely
You are my only love* dated 2.14.91 MJ


William Wagener, Conrad Murray and Robert Earl Carter

Now we did cover some of this last year on this blog update:  Here, and Here okay, we KNEW this information.  Now Conrad Murray may indeed be a real doctor . . . but a MEDICAL DOCTOR?  There were controversies with his license way back in April of 2010 and that of his wife/exwife Yvonne.

Cathy sent me this video – I don’t like William Wagener either
But he caught something I didn’t - Listen/Watch Carefully
At 1:04!


At 1:04 they play the Objection by the prosecution that Murray is a real doctor.  The objection is “assumes facts not in evidence” . . . and it is sustained.  Gotta give credit where credit is due, so William Wagener, I HATE IT that you solicit funds from fans to buy property Michael already owns, but thank you for that information.  I still don’t trust you, I still think you are a low-level thug awaiting a payday from an even BIGGER corporation than AEG, but thank you. 

I would like you to thank me for helping you out with the information on Murray and his names and licenses since I covered those OVER A YEAR AGO, but that’s okay.

The offices in Hawaii and Houston I was suspicious about, but the one in Vegas I covered before that he shared with his wife, who also shared the same number even though she’s not a cardiologist but a pediatrician (the one Michael may have very well REALLY have taken his children to).  I covered that here – Trial Day 6

Then Wagener wants us to believe that AEG set Michael up in a house, paid all his expenses, hired a phoney doctor for concerts, only to set Michael up to fail so they could collect what?  He says, “unrefunded ticket sales”.  Wow.  Wagener sucks at math.

Let’s not talk about Sony, and the MILLIONS they have made from posthumous deals.  We’ve already shown you the collusion between Branca, Weitzman and Watenmaker’s firms (you know, the ones that also stole from Cobain and Quaid) that we talked about last blog entry.

William Wagener, not sure of his game, but it sure sounds like he’s funded by Sony to me . . . Remember who he’s had soliciting funds for him.  He won’t mention Sony’s name as a corporation but he sure has no problem mentioning AEG.  Big red flag there!  I would still like to know why Mesereau would condescend to consort with the likes of him . . . Tom’s a defense lawyer.  Maybe he’s just networking for future business.  Wagener’s been arrested before, so he’s almost a sure thing.

Wagener has never answered any of my questions even though I emailed him in PRIVATE so that he wouldn’t have to answer me in public.  Then I tried commenting in public my questions but that didn’t work either.

One major issue keeps me from believing anything he says.  There is no explanation on how a guy who supposedly is calling out the corrupt government, ends up getting the lottery for court admittance EVERY DAY . . . not just for the Murray trial, but during Michael’s 2005 trial as well.

Erin Jacob’s group gets in there every day too and we know she has advertised for Sony and has the estates blessing in selling her “Michael” merchandise when Michael’s own mother DOES NOT . . . William Wagener calls out publicly AEG because the “other” corporation most likely has him in their back pocket . . . and have for a long time.

Now Wagener is of the impression (or he wants to give you the impression) that Murray was actually trying pass as a doctor for SINISTER reasons.  So here’s the question:

Was Murray faked by the bad guys, or was he faked by the good guys?

Twitters from ABC On Murray Trial

Now the trial doesn’t resume until Wednesday.    Hmmmmmm.  The twitters from ABC7 are below:

abc7MurrayTrial ABC7 Murray Trial
Judge Michael Pastor has ordered jurors to call the court tomorrow afternoon at 3 to find out if the trial will resume on Wednesday or not.
54 minutes ago

abc7MurrayTrial ABC7 Murray Trial
Trial will not be in session again tomorrow because of a new issue having to do with a new test done on Michael Jackson stomach content


Somebody screwed up . . . maybe it was me.  I’ve never seen such a mess.  How often are court cases postponed because the prosecution wants to admit new evidence on stomach fluids collected more than two years ago?  Wouldn’t that stuff be VODKA by now?

It’s a mess, I’m going to bed.  Keep the Faith and God Bless you. ♥♥♥



21 comments:

  1. “In 2005, Sony illegally dove headfirst into my Copyrighted Catalog without permission, that contains 12,000 songs..."

    I was curious who this was about so looked around that website, found this:

    http://www.judiciaryreport.com/fbi.htm

    it's Aisha and Judiciary Report is one of her many websites.
    "She was a child prodigy and has a genius level IQ.".

    That is the court document - her suing the FBI, very revealing. (Have you seen this, Bonnie?)

    2. "The release of (FBI) files and records under the Freedom Of Information Act and 2.) $850,000 in punitive and compensatory damages against the Defendants and all other remedies the court deems fit, due to massive, gross negligence, harassment, abuse and inhumane indifference from the FBI, under Robert S. Mueller’s instructions, which nearly claimed her life, while destroying her health, assets and finances, with the Defendants’ conduct being a proximate cause of the subsequent life threatening, unprecedented, stress-induced brain hemorrhage Aisha suffered, somewhat similar to the aneurysms Vice President Joe Biden suffered."

    3. "...due to physical side effects stemming from the stress induced brain hemorrhage and a nerve damaged right leg, the byproduct of a botched angiogram, when the hospital performed an emergency surgical procedure, trying to ascertain the source of the “life threatening” brain hemorrhage that was later attributed to stress."

    "8. The FBI’s delays and negligence in the Anthony Pellicano case, caused cases such as Bo Zenga v. Brad Grey to be corrupted and dismissed, much like Aisha’s 2005 civil case against Madonna."

    Her copyrighted catalog also contains:
    "...nano-technology, a solar cell phone and thousands of other items. Aisha is also the author of forthcoming medical and science patents to extend and improve human life, health and well-being."

    Perhaps using the music industrial complex via Madonna is a cover and what they are REALLY after is THOSE latter things mentioned in the lawsuit? The usual outcome (as with Tesla) would be to either destroy it or use it for evil.

    Aisha is speaking out. Good for her!
    Does this make the evening news?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bonnie said "Is this the very same “Sony/ATV” music catalog? Or is this a separate catalog?"

    Who is the author of that page of that blog Bonnie, because I can't see a name? It is interesting that you highlighted this theft of property today, when only yesterday I saw an interview with Sir Cliff Richard who fronted a campaign in Europe, where they planned to end copyright on sound recordings after 50 years.
    That meant, if an artist recorded a song when they were 14, they would stop receiving royalties on it when they were 64 - just when they need it most. The time frame has now been extended to 70 years. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-14882146
    It's still shocking that they can steal your own propery in this way. And that blog entry you linked to is even more shocking. Why are they getting away with it?

    ReplyDelete
  3. BONNIE said : "I’ve never seen such a mess. How often are court cases postponed because the prosecution wants to admit new evidence on stomach fluids collected more than two years ago? Wouldn’t that stuff be VODKA by now?

    Yes, they had over 2 years to get prepared ! It makes the trial look fishy & irreal but maybe it's worth waiting after all ! If God will (not the twisted justice), we'll know what happened.

    Bonnie, so many issues in this Blog, you are amazing ! Thank you also to all the friends who send you these Videos supporting your writings. Madonna (teaming with Sony?) is a very smart woman but no good person & she chose her camp to assure her immunity & protection in the showbiz world.

    From W. Wagener's Video : "Some big huge conglomerate corporation that was funding this thing (murder) & they did not want to give Michel the power to make another successful 50 concerts?"

    Then Sony (not AEG) would rather be in the picture (Branca appearance 7 days before 6.25.2009, Michael's music rights that were to be contractually reverted to him by Sony sometime in July 2009). Sony now has problems but no one still dares "touching" them nor even less naming them. As to AEG, I don't know what to think about them anymore but what disturbs me is the apparent "tough love" meeting held with K.Ortega, R. Phillips, F. Dileo & Murray at Michael's house. If Michael really received kind of threatenings over the possible cancellation of the TII shows with its following bad financial consequences for him, it certainly contributed to overstress him. Besides the arrogance Murray showed toward Kenny Ortega during that meeting probably did not lead Michael to sign Murray's employment contract that quickly either. So yes, what really happened between Murray & Michael on the 24/25th of June 2009 ? But whatever Wagener's game or camp is, many of his speculations raised in his Video were already developed in your Blog & also by many people worldwide before. Murray, a real doctor ?..Pfuiiiit !

    ReplyDelete
  4. Your video - "Wallstreet Protesters getting paid Who’s Paying them?"

    At 2:18:

    "It seems to be common sentiment that the government shouldn't be (? inaudible) printing cash and that The Fed should be audited or abolished."

    This is typical misleading FOX "news". The anchor runs two issues and entities together as though it's one in the same, playing on people's ignorance. Or am I misunderstanding? Anyway, that is my impression.

    "The Fed" is the Federal Reserve - private bankers. The U.S. Treasury Department is part of the federal government and prints the "cash" as directed by the Federal Reserve, which lends money back to the U.S. government with interest.

    The Federal Reserve has never been independently audited. I think it's safe to say it never will be. That is a problem, along with the fact that it even exists.

    Attempts to abolish the all-powerful Federal Reserve, along with many other eligible 'transgressions' earn assassination by way of "suicide" or a "crazed lone gunman". Their powers have now expanded to include various "natural causes".

    I have one of JFK's silver certificates - it is not a "Federal Reserve Note" but payable, in silver, to the bearer on demand. I don't think the bank would hand me silver in return though. Paper money in and of itself is worthless. Federal Reserve notes are actually a credit or certificate supposedly REPRESENTING something valuable that is never seen.

    Money...real money can not be "printed". And, The U.S. Constitution does not give the federal government the right to coin money, so far as I can tell.

    The Constitution does however say:
    ""No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts;"

    My understanding (though I never studied The Constitution in 12 years of government schooling), is that ALL rights belong to the people and states, unless The Constitution specifically gives a right to the federal government. If it's omitted, doesn't say then the right belongs to the people. Correct?

    The Oligarchy behind The Federal Reserve and IRS (income tax), which work hand in hand, has almost finished wiping it all away. Officially, it's taken them barely less than a century. But, they were hard at work laying the foundation long before 1913.

    "...and that government of the people by the people for the people, shall not perish from the earth."
    - Abraham Lincoln, 1863

    ReplyDelete
  5. Truthbtold said - "That is the court document - her suing the FBI, very revealing. (Have you seen this, Bonnie?) "

    ........ Yeah! Last year. I even quoted some of it before but I was looking for other information at the time, so I never followed up. During the time that Sony was stealing patents. I think that is the blog I was working on when I came upon that information.

    She has quite a story. It's funny because before I got to the end of your post the FIRST THING I THOUGHT ABOUT was Tesla!

    Now, put this in Michael's lap, and you realize the things he knew, and what cured illnesses, and what caused illnesses, how do you talk to a child and teach them how to bring themselves out of cancer? THIS . . . is the knowledge they want to keep from us. I believe most of the fatal diseases are probably manufactured or known chemical interactions that can cause everything from prenatal damage to diseases like Cancer and AIDS.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Truth said - "Perhaps using the music industrial complex via Madonna is a cover and what they are REALLY after is THOSE latter things mentioned in the lawsuit? The usual outcome (as with Tesla) would be to either destroy it or use it for evil."

    ......... Yes, I agree with you . . . one goal, one mind - destruction and enslavement.
    ---------------------------------------------

    Princess said - "Who is the author of that page of that blog Bonnie, because I can't see a name? It is interesting that you highlighted this theft of property today, when only yesterday I saw an interview with Sir Cliff Richard who fronted a campaign in Europe, where they planned to end copyright on sound recordings after 50 years."

    ............

    Aisha - if that's not a psuedonym. I will read more on that article you sent, Richard Cliff sounds familiar. What do they do with the copyrights here though? I think they still revert back to the artist (I believe that's already happened) that most of the music from the sixties would automatically leave control of label and revert to the artists. I wonder in Britain who gets those copyrights after the artist hits seventy?

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Princessglam -
    ""The new law also includes a number of provisions designed to ensure that musicians see a fair proportion of the extra income, including a fund for musicians who signed away their rights when a recording was made.

    The fund will be financed by record labels, who put aside a percentage of the benefits they get from the prolonged copyright."

    This can be good or bad as most labels control the rights to most musicians songs anyway. If anything, such as studio recordings, why can't the artist retain those rights to THEIR OWN CREATIONS and the labels just get a cut of the profit (without rights to say how it is used?)

    Artists should be controlling this, not companies. After a certain amount of time and loans are paid back (dangerous territory here) the artist should control their own catalog of songs, recordings etc.... and the entity that helped them should get a cut but NOT CONTROL IT. I never understood that.
    --------------------------------------------

    Line said - "It makes the trial look fishy & irreal but maybe it's worth waiting after all ! If God will (not the twisted justice), we'll know what happened."

    ........ I know this is going to be hard for you to take . . . BUT I AGREE! (can you handle that one, LOL!)

    You said - "Madonna (teaming with Sony?) is a very smart woman but no good person & she chose her camp to assure her immunity & protection in the showbiz world. "

    ......... Not as smart as she thinks she is . . . It's not the showbiz world she is going to have to answer to when all is said and done.

    on William Wagener - I heard that too. It's aggrivating, I want to like the guy but he is making it very, very hard. I have some other information on him but I don't know if it is relevant or not. I was getting Mad at T Mesereau when I found it but I have more searching to do. I at one time wanted to start a private blog for a few people, just to talk about some of the things that I have found and have not been able to post for fear of it hurting people, but I just don't have time to do two blogs, even a shorter one.

    Here's the thing with Wagener . . . I am TOTALLY on board with his fight against big and corrupt government and the string pulling corporations, but his talk and his actions are not matching up. The donation collecting is particularly irritating to me. And it doesn't wash that this guy is badmouthing the local government and that same local government is making sure he gets in to every single court day both in 2005 Michael's trial and this one.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Line said - "As to AEG, I don't know what to think about them anymore but what disturbs me is the apparent "tough love" meeting held with K.Ortega, R. Phillips, F. Dileo & Murray at Michael's house. If Michael really received kind of threatenings over the possible cancellation of the TII shows with its following bad financial consequences for him, it certainly contributed to overstress him. "

    ........ Okay this is going to be interesting. We've heard this from the prosecution's side, not yet from the defense side. I am willing to bet that this was completely taken out of context. It could have been over something as little as Michael being nervous about all this going down and he needed a "pep" talk.

    It could also be a conversation that was had with the "other" Michael. We won't know the total truth of this until the defense presents IT'S side and we can weigh the pros and cons, checks and balances.

    The interesting thing I DID take from that reported exchange was Murray telling Ortega "I'm the Doctor, your the director" . . . for all we know they could have been arguing over the roles they are playing.

    ReplyDelete
  9. His name is "Cliff Richard" - not "Richard Cliff"

    ReplyDelete
  10. In Britain, the rights revert to the public domain.
    To direct quote from a government copyright site:
    -----
    What happens when a copyright expires?

    The work will fall into the public domain, making it available to anyone wishing to use, copy or reproduce the work. This is how so many companies can publish works by William Shakespeare, classical composers etc

    --------

    ReplyDelete
  11. Oh.. one more thing. So this means after 70 years have passed since The Beatles composed whatever songs MJ owns in his catalogue... they will revert back to the British public domain. His children/estate wont make money from those songs anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Bonnie – this what I found. “The judge...give defense attorneys time to analyze new testing that coroner’s officials recently conducted...defense attorneys said they needed time to prepare for how to deal with testing the coroner’s office conducted last week on the level of the sedative lorazepam in Michael’s system.”

    “Murray’s attorneys have suggested that authorities ignored the effects lorazapam may have had on Michael and said their own testing suggested Michael had taken eight pills before his death. Coroner’s officials determined Michael died from a lethal dose of the anesthetic propofol.”

    “District Attorney said the defense lab’s results combine two numbers to make it seem like there was more lorazepam in Michael’s system than may have been present...coroner’s tests show a much smaller amount was actually…inconsistent with the theory that he swallowed several pills.”

    Since the defense abandoned the theory that Michael drunk the propofol, I think they are now concentrating to make their case on the amount of pills he took that caused his death.
    Mimi

    ReplyDelete
  13. Truthbtold said - ""It seems to be common sentiment that the government shouldn't be (? inaudible) printing cash and that The Fed should be audited or abolished."

    This is typical misleading FOX "news". The anchor runs two issues and entities together as though it's one in the same, playing on people's ignorance. Or am I misunderstanding? Anyway, that is my impression."

    .......... Nope, you're absolutely right. The problem is that most people don't know that the "Federal" reserve is and always has been a private enterprise. Once they get this the rest of the picture would fall in for them. It's not government owned, ruled or regulated. It is a prison built by private bankers to enslave governments under the guise of a government institution, using their economies as hostages.

    I did see some signs that actually had Rothschild's name on them. They ought to publish the rest because the same group of people also own/run the Bank if England and the Central Bank of Europe.

    ReplyDelete
  14. BONNIE said : "The interesting thing I DID take from that reported exchange was Murray telling Ortega "I'm the Doctor, your the director" . . . for all we know they could have been arguing over the roles they are playing."

    Yes if one believes that Michael is alive, although you know I am very skeptical about it. But I do wish I were wrong for once :o)

    ReplyDelete
  15. Truthbtold said - "is that ALL rights belong to the people and states, unless The Constitution specifically gives a right to the federal government. If it's omitted, doesn't say then the right belongs to the people. Correct?"

    ........ Correct, although amendments have been added that are questionable, but the main point is we still have people fighting for the words on that document and that's a good thing.

    I have more on the IRS - was just waiting for a relevant time to bring it out. :o)
    ------------------------------------------

    Anonymous said - "His name is "Cliff Richard" - not "Richard Cliff" "

    ........ LOL! My apologies. Temporary dyslexia. Must be the pollutants. :o)
    ---------------------------------------------

    Monika said - "The work will fall into the public domain, making it available to anyone wishing to use, copy or reproduce the work. This is how so many companies can publish works by William Shakespeare, classical composers etc"

    and "So this means after 70 years have passed since The Beatles composed whatever songs MJ owns in his catalogue... they will revert back to the British public domain."

    .......... Thank you Monika. I believe they already had that law over here in the States or something similar. Be that as it may, I have mixed feelings about that because even though I believe music should be shared, if it is being used to assist in the profit of something else (like a commercial or used in a movie) or a play, or an artist wants to re-record it . . . it should still be kept in the artist's family. That is their legacy, unless the surviving family member/heir wills it to public domain.

    ReplyDelete
  16. @Line - You can ask a person to open their eyes, but you can't make them see. But I'm trying . . .

    --------------------------------------------

    @Mimi -
    I found this while searching to see if it was even VIABLE to retest the stomach contents of a decedent after two and a half years:

    The process through which food is absorbed into the body can take anything from twenty two hours to two days to complete and within that time food is broken down and reduced to a liquid pulp from which essential proteins are extracted.

    Given that this process can take such a long time the contents of the stomach - and in particular their condition at the time of autopsy - can help to estimate the time of death.

    Also it can be used to prove if the deceased was perhaps lured into a false sense of security by their assailant by having a meal with them. A good example of this would be if the deceased's stomach contents consisted of some sort of pizza. The pizza would take roughly two hours to digest within the stomach and if the autopsy was performed and showed that the pizza was still in the stomach then it would be safe to assume the deceased died within two hours prior to discovery.

    http://www.exploreforensics.co.uk/stomach-contents-as-a-means-of-evidence.html

    Other bodily fluids and organs may provide samples, particularly samples collected during an autopsy. A common autopsy sample is the gastric contents of the deceased, which can be useful for detecting undigested pills or liquids that were ingested prior to death. In highly decomposed bodies, traditional samples may no longer be available. The vitreous humour from the eye may be used, as the fibrous layer of the eyeball and the eye socket of the skull protects the sample from trauma and adulteration. Other common organs used for toxicology are the brain, liver, and spleen.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forensic_toxicology

    Cont....

    ReplyDelete
  17. @Mimi cont.

    "Stomach contents: Hospitals normally "pump" the stomach contents of survivors of drug overdoses by way of a gastric tube that is inserted through the nostril and into the stomach. Once the contents are extracted from the stomach, they are washed to remove any stomach acids and tested for the presence of drugs or poisons. During an autopsy, forensic medical examiners test the stomach contents in the same manner. Getting stomach contents is crucial where criminal investigators suspect poisoning or drug overdose. Concentrations of any drugs found in the stomach are not necessarily proportional with their levels in the blood and thus their effects on an individual."

    From what I have found, there is a shelf life on stomach contents and after two years?

    "Forensic Collection Kits: NMS Labs provides a variety of specimen Forensic Collection Kits that ensure specimen integrity. NMS Labs will accept specimens in any shipping package (collection kit, etc.); however, failure to meet forensic collection, identification and transport requirements may jeopardize the acceptance of analysis results as evidence for use in criminal, civil, judicial or administrative proceedings. Please include the chain of custody form(s) in the same shipment as the specimens. Enclose the form(s) in a separate plastic bag to prevent contamination."

    "Embalmed, Fixed or Decomposed Tissue: The analysis of (formalin) fixed, embalmed and/or severely decomposed specimens presents unique and difficult challenges to the laboratory. In some cases, special preparation and handling, above and beyond that required for "normal" postmortem specimen is requested. In such cases, additional surcharges may be imposed for these services. To determine if additional, special preparation and handling is required, contact NMS Labs prior to sending these types of specimens." http://www.nmslab.com/sample-submission-forensic/

    Okay I'm done . . . YUCK!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Last one . . .


    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X09001759

    Very interesting reading. Now when do I get my doctorate? :o)

    ReplyDelete
  19. Monika said "Oh.. one more thing. So this means after 70 years have passed since The Beatles composed whatever songs MJ owns in his catalogue... they will revert back to the British public domain. His children/estate wont make money from those songs anymore."

    No. It only applies to sound recordings NOT music catalogs. Lots of artists only sing on records, it is those royalties NOT royalties from the use of music in catalogs e.g. for ringtones.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Thank you Princess for clarifying that.

    ReplyDelete
  21. --
    No. It only applies to sound recordings NOT music catalogs. Lots of artists only sing on records, it is those royalties NOT royalties from the use of music in catalogs e.g. for ringtones.
    ---

    I dont understand what you mean by this. Could you word it differently so i can understand?

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.