Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: November 2011

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Michael Jackson and Sony Getting Closer

Michael's Day in Court
Murray, Sony and the Left Hand

I will comment on Murray below and the sentencing, but first I have to comment on something I experienced today and to be perfectly honest, I am going to ask for something a little selfish . . . I need someone’s shoulder to cry on.

It’s not that I don’t have an understanding shoulder at home but there are just some things that are harder to explain to your husband then to others who share the same type of pain.

I drove to the store today and I on the way I was listening to Michael’s “Heal the World”.  I noticed the lines in the song,

there are ways to get there, if you care enough for the living, make a little space, make a better place . . .” and I thought, “This is all about people”.  


And it reminded me of the Bible verse I posted not too long ago, about love growing cold as one of the signs of the end times.

Matthew Chapter 24 – “11And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many. 12And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold."

It is this that is causing so much pain and I dwell on this.  It’s bad enough to know there are people out there deceiving Michael’s fans who are unaware.  It’s bad enough that the ‘love’ some profess they had for Michael all centers around his marketability and then I think beyond all this.  I think about the news clips and links people send me about what is going on in Africa, Iran, Uganda, Libya, Egypt, Palestine, South Africa, Haiti and even here in the states.

Does anyone know where the love of God goes . . . .” – Gordon Lightfoot

This is the link for the lyrics to that song “Heal the World”  Source

The Song

I go into the store, get what I need and come back out to the car.  Just to put you in my shoes, I am wearing a short sleeve, tie-died shirt, grey sweat pants and running sneakers.  My hair is pulled back in a ponytail and the 76 degrees we had yesterday with thunder and rain has been replaced with a sky full of boiling, low and angry clouds and raw temperatures in the fifties.  There are spits of rain in the air and the bite of air pockets wanting to be colder nipping at your skin.

I slip into the driver’s seat and place the bag on the floor in front of the passenger’s seat.  I click the start for the CD again.  I push past a couple of songs because I wasn’t in the mood for anything aggressive and I lit upon “Will You Be There” and let it play.

As I drive home, the tears start filling my eyes just as I turn onto my road.  I barely made it into the driveway and turned the car around to back up to the garage before they poured over.  I thought about God.

As the car continued to run, I reached into the center console to grab some napkins.  I bent into the steering wheel and just cried.  I didn’t say it out loud, but it was coming out of my heart to God and I know and felt that he heard me.  The song continued to play and in the background I could hear Michael’s voice talk about our turbulence and our violence, and I cried.

I asked God, “What’s going to happen?  How do we not fear it?  How do we push aside this pain?  So, so many people just getting plowed over and under.  Nobody cares, nobody loves, nobody wants to because if you let yourself, you feel like this . . . Just pain and nowhere to put it.  There are so many lost it is unfathomable.  I read about the multitude there will be in Heaven, the elect, but how many will not make it?  How many will be deceived right into the pit?

I didn’t dare ask God to take the pain from me because for me that would be going backwards to what I used to be.  But I do feel there would be less pain if other people knew they could ask God to take it from them or give them some relief.  How do we tell people that God cares when all they can see is this going on in the world?

I couldn’t exactly pinpoint what I felt.  It wasn’t just about Michael.  It was some of it but not the bulk of what I felt.

While I listened to Michael finishing his monologue at the end of “Will You Be There” I wanted to ask God to let me talk to him.  Because in writing this blog I really feel sometimes that in searching for the truth, the potential for hurting and not helping those working to help Michael is always a risk.   And God knows if I knew I hurt someone . . .

Whatever the plan is I support the Jackson family and I support Michael’s message, but I am not a liar and I am not used to deception or having to maneuver through it.  Just a search term entered into my blog will sometimes rip my heart out.  Sometimes I just want to lay down and sleep and never wake up, I am so tired.

How many children lay where they sleep at night thinking the same thing?  How many will die not ever knowing what an arm felt like holding them, or a warm hug that told them “I will protect you”?  How do people go through life justifying the money they make off the name of a man they profess to love, that only wanted them to care about those same children?

These people that called Michael their friend . . . people like Boteach or Uri Geller.  Has ANY charity they’ve run actually produced funds that went to the people those charities were supposed to benefit?

When was the last time Eddie or Frank Cascio tossed a thought toward an eleven pound two year old child lying listlessly in the dirt in Ethiopia while they make the rounds on T.V. hawking their book about Michael?

Ignorance is excusable . . . Intentional and mendacious duplicity is evil.  Lying hurts other people.  Lying hurts beyond the person who received the lie.  The immediate shot spreads through the veins of humanity.  The consequences of that lie infects and spreads like a disease and the longer it goes on, the harder it is to contain the damage it causes.  

Those wanting the truth are left to sort through the fallout and when you are trying to help other people find that truth, the weight of that responsibility becomes your identity.

This is only a FRACTION of the burden Michael drug around on his little shoulders.  And there are people on Facebook, people on twitter who are basking in their selfish glory while the new and unsuspecting believe their lies.  More children will fall.

Matthew Chapter 24:

4And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.

 5For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.

6And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet."

Well, I’m failing . . . I am troubled.  I know things must come to pass, but it hurts when I see people blocking others from the truth.  They are cutting them off spiritually, just like they tried to do to Michael.  Michael tried to tell us and look what they did to him. 

Here is the thing – I have never shied away from answering questions about how I felt, what I believe or for saying the truth.  I do not believe that Michael is dead.  But it is not my job to prove he is alive. That is not the point of this blog and I’m sorry if I ever led anyone to believe that is the TRUTH I am trying to uncover.  On the contrary, I believe Michael is much SAFER wherever he is now.

However, in searching for answers and the TRUTH, all possible avenues have to be looked at and the clues being left for those that care to consider them are not LEFT out there just for giggles.  There is a purpose for them.

I also believe that this whole “case” as Latoya calls it, is much, much bigger than the person they believe was in that house on Carolwood on June 25th, 2009.

This is not a game, it is not a “whodunit”, this is not a drama.  This is reality with extreme and extraordinary ramifications.  There are PEOPLE that do not want you to KNOW about it and they are NOT keeping you in the dark to PROTECT YOU, but to HURT YOU.

I was watching the sentencing today and the whole time I felt it was a waste of time.  How is this helping people?  It’s not.

What is this really about?  Are we trying to find the truth about what happened to Michael?  And if so, how is that going to help Michael?  Will it bring him back?  Jermaine says no.  Latoya says no.  People will go to jail and the estate executors will make money and Michael’s children will end up pretty much like Courtney Love or Randy Quaid . . . having to sell their souls to the devil and cut albums to prevent crooked, mob-connected jerks from coming after them with bogus felony charges or sexual crimes if they don’t do what the’re told!  (right Weitzman?)

If this is about the BIGGER picture, and this goes beyond Michael and a few greedy lawyers and a gaggle of rabid, incense-infested stalker groupies who are deluding themselves into some kind of significance with same mob-connected jerks, how is this “drama” helping us to focus on that?

Frustration.  Isolation.  Pain, responsibility, terror, threats, fear, crying, anguish, fighting and struggle.

That was Michael Jackson’s life.  Do I want him to come back to this?

No way in hell.  He couldn’t fix it when he was here, I don’t see that changing now, when it is so much worse.

Michael Jackson is not an Icon.  He’s not a celebrity and he’s not some sideshow attraction whose worth is limited to a twisted tabloid story and how many tickets he can sell . . . How many books authors can profit from or the incredible log of documentaries and talk shows one can build for themselves on his name.  I’m sick of it.

I was never a fan of Michael Jackson . . . SUE ME!  I didn’t buy his music, I didn’t go to his concerts and I knew next to nothing about him other than he had been in the business for a long time and I heard his songs when they were on T.V. or radio.

As a result Michael became something more to me when I went on this discovery trip.  Michael became known to me as a human being.  And not just a human being, but one that loved God as much as he’s shown me that I could love God.  Michael became hope to me.  He became someone who showed me just how human Jesus was, and what the strength of faith can do. 

Michael became a mentor to me in the growth and maturing of my faith.  What made me want to get to know Michael Jackson was this sentence I heard out of his mouth during the very first interview of his I ever listened to . . .

@2:35 –Jesus said to love the Children
To be like Children

That sentence is what made me fall in love with Michael Jackson, and when I say “fall in love”, I mean it was the start.  I wanted to know more about who he was from HIM, not from the press or the media or people who don’t know how to be HUMAN to others.  This interview/deposition made me start pouring through all others and in every single one of them Michael talked about God, Jesus, praying and reading the Bible.

When I see people not learning simple lessons from Michael’s past pain, it hurts me.  When I see people grabbing for dollars off of Michael’s name while the children he cared so much for die of starvation and abuse in EVERY part of the world, it hurts.  It HURTS!  The pain is more than I thought I would ever feel!

Losing someone like Michael is painful enough . . . WASTING HIM is unbearable!  Do you hear me?  You people know who you are!!!

God is behind Michael. I fully believe that.   Sometimes I go to God with the pain I feel and my confusion and affliction about all this but I will never ask God for him to take this pain back.  It brought me back to life.

Michael, have no doubt wherever you are I love you with all my heart.  You are in mine.  And sometimes I don’t even know what I’m doing here, this is INSANE, but I never question where the call came from.  Just know that.  I will cry a million more tears before this is over but I want God to know I will do whatever he asks me but sometimes I just need some help.  I love you and God bless your big heart.

Now onto the Murray Thing.

Dr. Conrad Murray Sentencing Hearing

The judge had some things to say on opening and he went through some instructions.  He also asked both side’s councils if they had submitted their sentencing statements and asked about pertinent changes or submissions.

Walgren has Mr. Panish, who is the *new* attorney for the Jackson family, read a statement from the family.  The statement read reviews the pain and loss to the family, brothers, sisters and Michael’s children, and that they wanted the judge to pass a sentence that would deter other doctors from selling their services to the highest bidder. 

My opinion is that other doctors should be in that room getting passed the same sentences, but Murray is filling their shoes for now.  Murray is the one who was charged with the manslaughter charge and although Michael’s plethora of other doctors didn’t actually kill him, it’s not like they didn’t try.

Walgren reads from the Probation report Miss Katherine’s statement, which makes no sense when Latoya’s speech on Nov. 20th in the video.  Walgren states that Miss Katherine asked for the maximum sentence, but this is not reflected in the written statement read by the Jackson’s actual attorney.  I found that telling but not surprising.

Letter from Weitzman states restitution for costs of funeral (memorial?) of $1,186,817.00 plus, and loss of revenue from concerts $100 million.  This ticked me off and I’ll talk more about that further down.

Chernoff speaks and Judge states that Murray has a right to speak.  Murray does state that he declines to make a statement (he actually speaks!)  Chernoff’s presentation bothered me because he was the most emotional out of all of them there.  Chernoff was upset and I in turn got upset.

Chernoff’s choice of words rather telling (the book of life???) when he says that Murray’s book of life should be considered and not just one chapter in it.  I was not too impressed with his presentation, but he did not seem to be able to put words together.  Chernoff is probably one of the more caring and personally involved of any of the attorneys from either side.  I decided I liked him even though he did say Michael was ‘drug seeking’ . . . I did NOT agree with that at all (Michael is not an addict, but he was DRUGGED by others).  Aside from that rather offensive remark, Chernoff in my book is an asset to a rather offensive profession.  I wish there were more compassionate lawyers like him.

After Chernoff’s plea, the judge makes some inquiries as to any other statements, then proceeds to offer his presentation and ruling.  Oddly, the judge refers to Chernoff’s review of the time Murray has already served as “protective custody”.  I wasn’t sure if this was what Murray’s incarceration was actually for, or if that was the description of possible solitary confinement due to threats on his life.

Judge Pastor gave Murray 4 years with 46 months credit (time served and good work, 23 days each) but in L.A. County jail instead of state prison because of the  sentencing realignment law recently passed in California. 

Judge then entered a charge of restitution for the court of $800 and $30 security fee, $40 criminal assessment charge.

Walgren asks to defer date for restitution to be able to talk to Estate people and family.  Judge suggests within 120 days.  Walgren asks sometime in January and Chernoff asks if it could be sooner.  Judge said with the people involved in gathering receipts and calculations two weeks is unrealistic.   Date set for January 23, 2012. 

Estate asks for Restitution

The judge was not very happy with the way the prosecution submitted the request by Michael’s estate executors for restitution.  The judge read the one page request reviewing the $1 million plus determined by receipts (Judge said, “I’d like to see it”) and  the $100 million in lost concert earnings.  Judge Pastor stated that their request would be reviewed when resubmitted with appropriate receipts and itemization and that the appropriate restitution in amount and manner would be determined by the court.  Judge will not order restitution for the estate without more information and receipts.

I am suspecting of the whole restitution issue because AEG paid for that memorial or at least half of it.  Also a $1 million plus memorial is NOT a necessary punishment for a doctor that never even got paid.  The memorial was beyond extravagant and if anything, a REASONABLE funeral expense, if not covered by life insurance, would be understandable, but not a multi-million dollar memorial.

Walgren asks the judge to consider restitution from Murray . . . the ESTATE requested payment for the MEMORIAL?  Excuse me but didn’t AEG pay for that?  Source, and Source and Source

According to THIS SOURCE, both AEG and the Estate were to split the memorial costs of a little over $3 million dollars, plus costs for police equipment.

Michael Jackson's Staples Center memorial was almost a year ago, and the bickering over costs incurred by the city--the cost of the event was put at $3.2 million, according to the LA Times--have been going on nearly as long, with the city, and in particular then-newly-elected City Attorney Carmen Trutanich, demanding AEG pay for the extra police, permits, and sanitation needed for the funeral. Today everyone made up with some money and some kind words for one another. AEG and the Jackson estate have agreed to donate $1 million to the Los Angeles general fund, per a press release, and $300,000 in cash and equipment to the Los Angeles Police Foundation.

Is AEG getting reimbursed or the estate?  Because from what Walgren and the Judge both read out loud, this is a request from THE ESTATE.  And what exactly are they asking for?  Funeral costs or memorial costs?

Why would the estate ask for funds for a memorial from Dr. Murray?  Who’s decision was it to hold a memorial?  A funeral perhaps, but REASONABLE COSTS for a funeral.  I know of no other murderer aside from Murray, who has been asked to pay for a funeral or lost wages of a person killed.  This is what insurance is for.

The other side of this outlandish request is Judge’s response.  On a single piece of paper, I guess the estate executors expected to be granted restitution for the total of $101,186,817.00 (memorial/funeral and proposed Michael Jackson earnings from concerts) without any receipts of costs paid or itemization of lost earnings.  Judge Pastor said, “I want to see them”.  So they have until January 23, 2012 to come up with some receipts and figures.

Murray and council has 60 days to file an appeal.

Also the $100 million dollar loss of revenue – If memory serves me correctly, the Estate has already made over $200 million from the movie.  That is $100 million more than Michael would have made during the concerts MINUS expenses . . . Didn’t the estate already make 100% increase in expected earnings with Michael’s death?  Now they want their fall guy to pay for what  . . . the monetary loss that never occurred?  What is the family going to get out of this? 

Nothing.  It goes to the estate, right?

Now, let’s see what Branca’s bloggers and paid trolls are doing.

What the MJJC is doing and certain other bloggers are promoting

By the way, I got attacked by Gatorgirl/Nicki/Nikki on Twitter, only I wasn’t there to see it.  I saw her Twitlonger post that someone sent to me and while she claimed she is not pro-Sony, she called me illiterate.  Since I’m not aware of what her standards are as far as being able to read and think critically, I’ll leave her to her opinions.  She and most of her buddies still follow my blog so I must not be too hard of a read. 

I’m not too concerned with name calling, only in revealing the players and uncovering the truth.  A complete sentence from her though, would have been more effective in proving her point.  There you go, Nikki . . . I gave you a freebie.  I still have copies of her emails and facebook messages asking me not to tell anyone she’s writing a book, so I know what her motives were way back in 2010. 

Pro-Bono, Pro-Bullsh*t

This statement was in MJ777’s wall posted with a link to MSNBC article on the sentencing hearing:

Attorney Brian Panish read a statement from the Jackson family saying that there was "no way to adequately describe" their loss and asking for a sentence that would "remind physicians that they cannot sell their services to the highest bidder."

The statement did not specifically request the maximum term of four years in jail, but a lead prosecuting attorney David Walgren later said that was what mother Katherine Jackson requested. Walgren also said that "Every morning, the first thing (Katherine Jackson) thinks about" is her late son.
”  Source

So why didn’t Miss Katherine ask for it in her read written statement?  Then further down I saw this in reference to MJJC:

They are promoting a special edition of Jermaine’s book in which they say only a few were printed.  Does Jermaine know about this?  Source

The MJJCommunity also solicit donations “to keep the community alive”.  Is Sony going broke?  Proof  But that’s not all.  They are also, according to supporter Seven Bowie, soliciting for gifts to give the prosecuting attorneys, Judge Pastor and prosecution witnesses such as Dr. Shafer.

Found originally on Seven Bowie’s “fan” Facebook page was this write up by her:

The fans at MJJC took up a collection and sent gifts and flowers to Walgren, Pastor, Steinberg and Shafer. This is what Dr. Shafer wrote back to the fan club!

Dear Ms. Vetchinina:

It is very nice to hear from you. I am honored and humbled by your kind generosity.

I am a little conflicted about the gift, and I will be happy to explain why. I testified because I have spent years studying the safe use of intravenous anesthetic drugs like propofol. I also wanted to state that doctors do act like Conrad Murray. My testimony was “pro bono”, which means “for the good.” I did not receive any payment, and I offered my testimony with no expectation of any personal reward. I am a little concerned that accepting gifts might look like I actually expected something in return for my testimony.

I will receive your gift with appreciation. I am sure that it will be “from the heart”, and I will accept it with gratitude “from the heart.” You will find my address in my contact information below.

Again, I appreciate your kind comments and thoughtfulness.

Steve Shafer

It is also posted directly on MJJC site  - Source

And Just in case they delete the thread:

Screenshot, donations

I am unclear as to why Seven Bowie would post these two issues, because you have to admit, this doesn’t make the people she promotes look very good.  The way she worded the entry about Walgren’s statement made Walgren look like another tabloid misquoter of the Jacksons.

The issue with the gifts for the prosecution – Is she uneducated about the legalities of this or did she post this to call them out? 

I’ve had my issues with Bowie before, but nothing serious. She called my blog “weird” on Catherine Gross’s radio show, but she promotes the blog of a woman who claims God showed her Michael’s face on her bathroom floor, so how can I hold anything seriously against her?

Here is the link directly to the page at MJJC forum –

Someone copied the original request

Announcement of amounts collected

According to this, they collected almost $500 for “flowers” but apparently, and according to the letter from Dr. Shafer posted, they had enough to also send him gifts.  I wonder how the other doctors made out?

There are pages and pages of discussion on getting doctors addresses and where to send gifts to Judge Pastor and Walgren and Brazil.  The only two doctors I believe they planned to gift was Shafer and Steinburg. They should have written me, I have their addresses and their professional affiliations!  It took me less than three hours to find ALL the prosecution’s doctors.

Proof QBees, Wendy/Tinkerbell, Ginvid, Lorraine,
Stacey MJ and others work for Sony

After doing some more snooping, I took some screenshots of the “senior” staff at this site.  It’s boldly obvious to anyone on this site that the use of logos and sales of merchandise are sanctioned by both Sony and the Estate.  Their “legal” disclaimers are interesting, but let’s take a look at some “seniors”

I recognize some names, do you?

I recognize several names here, just from the harassment I received as far back as last year.  You’d think some of these goons would at least change their names:

Ginvid, Jasper, Lorraine, Qbee (Queen bee and several other ID’s for this one, I still have copies of her hateful messages through facebook and the MJJustice web site.)  StaceyMJ and Angela_MJJ.  Daryll748, and senior staff Ivy, “MJ Tinkerbell” (wendy, hello!), Maria MJ, Lucilla and jadore.  The owner is listed as “GAZ”.

The site is licensed by Sony and sanctioned by the Estate.  Their marketing and promotion is done on this site and Ron Sweet’s site, which I have also listed below.

Now, what would a Sony-licensed and managed site be doing taking donations and soliciting for gifts for the prosecution?  Is this legal?  I didn’t see it in their disclaimer, but this does remind me of something Latoya said . . . .

Latoya’s “left hand” people, who she said “I’m not saying AEG, I’m saying these people that surrounded themselves” . . . and “people that Michael did not want back in his life” were in that court room telling the judge “you do understand we’re friends with the chief of police, don’t you judge?

These are the same people asking for donations and buying GIFTS for PUBLIC SERVANTS???  Is this that BRIBE LAW that 400 California Judges took part in and that Richard Fine was jailed in solitary confinement over a year, for exposing?

Sony – Nice work.  Why not post it on Fox News!  Talk about conspicuous!

It will be interesting to see what comes out of this restitution issue in January.  The itemization and receipts that the Judge asked for especially.

They are going to have to go through AEG to get some of this, and we KNOW expenses between Sony and AEG will have to be aired.  I can’t wait!

Remember what Latoya said – The right hand was presented to us in court.  It’s the left hand we need to reveal.

By the way, don’t confuse MJJC with MJJC.  Michael J. Jackson Community and Michael J. Jackson Collectors are two different, but still Sony-sanctioned sites.

This is Ron Sweet’s site where they market all kinds of Michael Jackson stuff, I’m assuming, with the BLESSING of the estate executors.  I covered Ron Sweet here:

MJ SubMarket, and Sony Pimps.  (Ron Sweet is another Journalist-turned-MJ-entreprenuer. What a guy!)

Every SINGLE one of these people are siphoning off of Michael’s children . . . EVERY SINGLE ONE!


Owners and contributors listed there.  “

I’ll close again with this question . . .

What are Sony-sanctioned and funded web sites doing soliciting donations for gifts for the prosecution and the judge?

These are the people attacking AEG and campaigning for Murray’s hide, which is fine if he is guilty . . . but we already know Murray is not the left hand.  And since AEG has been front and center in the accusations, I don’t think AEG is the left hand either. 

Remember, the contract left on the bed in Michael’s house had Murray’s signature on it but NOT MICHAEL’S AND NOT AEG’S.

Who put that there on MICHAEL’S BED?

Latoya said that AEG asked to be part of this case.  Who would do that if they had anything to hide?  She said people attending the preliminary told the judge they were friends with the L.A. police department.  But she also said “I’m not saying AEG, I’m saying the people that surrounded themselves” and that “Michael did not want back in his life”.

Who is that?


This is Michael Jackson’s Blog . . .

Monday, November 28, 2011

Revisiting Michael Jackson's "This Is It"

November 28, 2011
What We Didn’t Catch about “This is It”
Michael Jackson’s Bible Verses Again

I broke back into the Gospels in the Bible in my daily reading, from the minor prophets in the Old Testament, and as I read through the one page explaining the transition (400 years between the old and new Testaments), I read down the summarization, as I always do, of the books of the new Testament.  As I read through this I caught a reference to the book of John, and the partial passage “I’m the light of the world”. 

I ran to my computer and pulled up a song I hadn’t listened to probably since 2009, when it first made waves.  A song next to no one paid much attention to other than it was the first new song people had heard Michael sing in years.  The controversy surrounding it though, reminded me very much of the right hand keeping people distracted from what the left hand is doing.  (Thanks LaToya!  God bless you!)

What happened next?  I pulled up the song on Youtube and found one with the lyrics and I listened to it in its entirety.

Then I listened to it again.  Then I listened to it a third time and I realized that much like “Dangerous”, there were parts of Bible passages in this song.

I remember in the beginning of this “case” as Latoya calls it, one of the first “newer” songs that was leaked out (after Michael’s passing) for the “concerts” was “This is It”.  It was leaked on youtube and the forum and other forums Sony ran.

This is It
With Lyrics

These Bible verses are referenced in the very first stanza of this song:

“This is it . . . here I stand . . .”

1And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.

“I’m the light of the world, I feel grand . . .”

12Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.

In reference to the number “a thousand” and “a thousand years”, this is also in the Bible, ironically in Revelation, three times:

“And it feels as though I’ve seen your face a thousand times…”

Revelation 20:2
And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,

“And I feel as though I’ve known you since a thousand years . . .”

Revelation 20:3
And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.

“And if feels as though I’ve known you for a thousand years . . .”  (Michael’s lyrics to this song are here – Source)

Revelation 20:4
And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

There is also  this in verse five:

Revelation 20:5
But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.

The rest of Michael’s song is rather personal and can be interpreted as either Michael singing about his love for Christ, or expressing what Christ wanted to tell us.  It could be interpreted a number of ways, but there are two lines that caught my attention, only because of the dreams I’ve had:

And you tell me that you’ve seen my face before . . .

And –

And you said you saw my face yourself

This could be taken personally, by any believer in Jesus, whether you dreamed of him or whether you’ve seen his face in any of God’s creation.  And before people go getting half-cocked on the lines referencing “I never thought that I would be your lover”, consider that even Jesus talked about the marriage of the bride and the bridegroom – Christ and his church, which all of the elect would attend the wedding feast.  Jesus also talked about “becoming one” with his church and us becoming “one” with him and of “one mind” with him.

Matthew 25:1
Then shall the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom.

Revelation 18:23
And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.

Revelation 21:2
And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.

Revelation 21:9
And there came unto me one of the seven angels which had the seven vials full of the seven last plagues, and talked with me, saying, Come hither, I will shew thee the bride, the Lamb's wife.

Revelation 22:17
And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is at thirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.

This kind of pure love, for Jesus who loved us first and enough to die for us, for those that can see, and see his face and to be able to witness Michael’s translation of this in this beautiful song  (No, I am not going to run away).  Could Michael have been singing for Christ, telling us the time is near?

There are even references to “This is It”, that exact phrasing in the Bible:

Genesis 49:28
All these are the twelve tribes of Israel: and this is it that their father spake unto them, and blessed them; every one according to his blessing he blessed them.

In Genesis, introducing the 12 Tribes of Israel, of which shall number as the sand in the sea, but a “remnant” shall be saved.  Of these twelve tribes, Judah, from where Jews came, will also a remnant be saved.

Leviticus 10:3
Then Moses said unto Aaron, This is it that the LORD spake, saying, I will be sanctified in them that come nigh me, and before all the people I will be glorified. And Aaron held his peace.

In this passage above, Moses admonishes Aaron for burning incense to foreign gods after the fire from God destroyed those who sought to make their own gods.

Numbers 8:24
This is it that belongeth unto the Levites: from twenty and five years old and upward they shall go in to wait upon the service of the tabernacle of the congregation:

This is it, what God told Moses that he would give Aaron the gift of the Levites to purify them and work in the tabernacles to cleanse the children of Israel.

What remnant is left of them could be the very reason not all of the children of Israel fell into the hands of the “Mystery of Babylon” and will be saved.  This is history I am still putting together given the disobedience of Israel throughout the Bible (really, of all of us).

During my conversation with Micheline, she brought up a very, VERY interesting point.  How did “This is It” come to be part of “the movie”  documentary “This Is It”?  Not one piece of footage do we see Michael performing this song.  It is not in the song lineup for the “concerts”, it is SPECIFICALLY ADDED TO THE MOVIE VERSION OF THIS “CASE”, as if they had PLANNED there to be a film and Michael wanted this song used.

How else could this get put in the Movie and how did Sony get a hold of it to put into the Movie?

Something else – at the beginning of the song, you hear Michael saying “one, two, three, four”.  While this could be something “they” decided to keep in a rather “unfinished” track by Michael’s standards, it also could allude to the “four years to get it right”.

We have covered other things in the Bible that our shadowy governments are trying to twist into their version of ‘controlled knowledge’ when in reality they control nothing. They are however keeping you from the truth by blocking your access to it with lies.

Republic Lost
Republic, Lost from lessig on Vimeo.

Michael tried to tell us the only way he could, about what they were doing to him and doing to us.  Michael was trying to warn us about this, but he was also trying to tell us about the bigger picture, beyond the material.

Once you kill a man’s spirit, the rest will usually soon follow, unless they can draw their strength from something greater than self.   This is where Michael and God embraced.  What Michael knew, he wanted to share with us because he knew what would happen if hope ever died.  The children Michael was trying to save?  Us.  All of us.

Knowledge was a big part of that.  Michael’s dreams included reaching the child through the very tools the conspirators were using to destroy us.  Music, entertainment, movies, games, resorts but instead of using these things to peel families from one another, Michael wanted to bring them back together.

Malachi 4:6
And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse.

Luke 1:17
And he shall go before him in the spirit and power of Elias, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just; to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.

Ephesians 6:4
And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

Colossians 3:21
Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged. 

Do you think Michael knew something we did not?

Michael’s dream to reach children and reconnect families was thwarted at every turn, with every partner.  Michael announced his intentions with Prince Al Waleed in 1996 at a press conference.  What happened?

Michael’s plan was to start a children’s hospital as far back as 1999. 

What happened?

Michael wanted to branch into video games and interactive multi-media.  The partnering with Stan Lee and Peter Paul from Marvel Comics is known to most of us because of this video of Michael’s tour of this studio in 2000:

Michael Intends to invest in Marvel Comics
(I know I’ve pointed this out in the past,
But Michael knows his paints just by looking
At them and that just impresses me with
Everything else he knows).

Note that both Stan Lee and Peter Paul are standing by Michael in various shots of this video as they tour him around the animation studio.

Now watch what happens to this business deal:

Stan Lee, Michael Jackson and
Another “FRIEND”, the Clintons?

Notice Michael Jackson’s name doesn’t even come up in this at ALL even though this is the very same business deal and the same timing.

Yeah, Michael and the Clinton’s were real good friends . . . who is the one that tried to tell me that in a comment?  Where are you?  The Clinton’s don’t have many friends who aren’t pushing up daisies.

Vince Foster Died over This

List of the Dead
Bush’s not the only crime family

By the way 1993, aside from the fact that Vince Foster lost his life, was also the same year that Michael was:

1.   Squired away to England for “intervention” (MK Ultra)
2.   Was accused by Evan Chandler of molesting his son
3.   Was strip-searched at his own home
4.   Was found by Jermaine and family hooked up to I.V’s in a hotel room in Taiwan.

And that’s just what we know.  If you remember, one of the other Clinton associates I reported on earlier, Marc Rich, who at the behest of Abe Foxman, was pardoned by Bill Clinton before he left office.  His ex-wife Denise Rich was involved in a fundraiser with both Schmuley Boteach and Michael’s “Heal the Kids”, who’s fundraiser Denise hosted was embezzled.  Source


He’s on the same “destroy people’s lives” agenda that the “Bush/Clinton/Bush” policies infected us with.

3 men who pulled down Wall Street-- where are they now?

Here's a quick look into the three former Fannie Mae executives who brought down Wall Street.

Franklin Raines was a Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Fannie Mae.  Raines was forced to retire from his position with Fannie Mae  when auditing discovered severe irregularities in Fannie Mae's accounting activities. At the time of his departure The Wall Street Journal noted, " Raines, who long defended the company's accounting despite mounting evidence that it wasn't proper, issued a statement late Tuesday conceding that "mistakes were made" and saying he would assume responsibility as he had earlier promised. News reports indicate the company was under growing pressure from regulators to shake up its management in the wake of findings that the company's books ran afoul of generally accepted accounting principles for four years."  Fannie Mae had to reduce its surplus by $9 billion.

Raines left with a "golden parachute valued at $240 Million in benefits. The Government filed suit against Raines when the depth of the accounting scandal became clear. . The Government noted, "The 101 charges reveal how the individuals improperly manipulated earnings to maximize their bonuses, while knowingly neglecting accounting systems and internal controls, misapplying over twenty accounting principles and misleading the regulator and the public. The Notice explains how they submitted six years of misleading and inaccurate accounting statements and inaccurate capital reports that enabled them to grow Fannie Mae in an unsafe and unsound manner."  These charges were made in 2006.  The Court ordered Raines to return $50 Million Dollars he received in bonuses based on the miss-stated Fannie Mae profits.

Net windfall . . . $190 million!

Tim Howard -  Was the Chief Financial Officer of Fannie Mae. Howard "was a strong internal proponent of using accounting strategies that would ensure a "stable pattern of earnings" at Fannie.In everyday English - he was cooking the books.  The Government Investigation determined that, "Chief Financial Officer, Tim Howard, failed to provide adequate oversight to key control and reporting functions within Fannie Mae,"

On June 16, 2006, Rep. Richard Baker, R-La., asked the Justice Department to investigate his allegations that two former Fannie Mae executives lied to Congress in October 2004 when they denied manipulating the mortgage-finance giant's income statement to achieve management pay bonuses. Investigations by federal regulators and the company's board of directors since concluded that management did manipulate 1998 earnings to trigger bonuses.. Raines and Howard resigned under pressure in late 2004.

Howard's Golden Parachute was estimated at $20 Million!

Jim Johnson -  A former executive at Lehman Brothers and who was later forced from his position as Fannie Mae CEO.   A look at the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight's May 2006report on mismanagement and corruption inside Fannie Mae, and you'll see some interesting things about Johnson. Investigators found that Fannie Mae had hidden a substantial amount of Johnson's 1998 compensation from the public, reporting that it was between $6 million and $7 million when it fact it was $21 million."   Johnson is currently under investigation for taking illegal loans from Countrywide while serving as CEO of Fannie Mae.

Johnson's Golden Parachute was estimated at $28 Million.

FRANKLIN RAINES? Raines works for the Obama Campaign as his Chief Economic Advisor.
TIM HOWARD?  Howard is a Chief Economic Advisor to Obama under Franklin Raines.
JIM JOHNSON?  Johnson was hired as a Senior Obama Finance Advisor and was selected to run Obama's Vice Presidential Search Committee.

So Michael’s “four years” to “get it right or it’s irreversible, the damage we’ve done” more than likely has to do with humanity then it does whether or not a tree is going to grow back where it was cut down.

Michael was a threat to these people because as Micheline said so eloquently in an email to me several weeks back when she sent me the accompanying video on his reception in Russia:

This is only one city on the planet, and Michael was received this way everywhere he went.

Bonnie, this is so much more than simple appreciation for the humanitarian work Michael does.  There are other people who do good work as well and I'm not trying to minimize their contributions, like Bono, U2, etc.  But this is different.  The more I look at the powerfully positive impact Michael had with heads of state, and the way they showed their unbridled admiration, the more I am seeing exactly why the system felt they had to destroy him.  There is no other reason in the world, other than the threat Michael posed to the plans for an oppressive One World Government.  No one else had the power to mobilize the masses the way Michael was able to.  He did it for the good of humanity - but since when does humanity count for anything in the corrupt world of power politics?”

“And at 19:20 on the timer, Michael is sitting at a large reception table with the host of the city and the press, and who is sitting next to him?  None other than members of the Cascio family!  You can see Mrs. Connie Cascio plain as day, and the two young kids sitting next to him are her children.  It might even be Dominic Cascio sitting next to Connie - don't forget this was 1993 and he was much younger then with no glasses.”

Michael’s Reception in Russia
Sorry, it’s in Russian But you
Can still read faces and see what
Micheline is talking about

The reaction of one young
Man as he recounts his meeting
With Michael at a
Russian Orphanage

Now, with all that above, what I promised you two days ago.  I did copy Latoya’s words to the best of my abilitly.  I will comment in between each time paragraph recorded.

Latoya’s Speech
Listen Carefully
November 20, 2011

@1:22 – She says “I want you to listen carefully when I say to you” (and she says this twice before continuing), “that we all want justice.  And that in the beginning, Dr. Murray was the fall guy.  And I will continue , and listen to me carefully . . . I will continue to say that he’s the fall guy.  He was instrumental in what happened to my brother.”

This is a good lead in.  Murray is the fall guy.  Yes, I think we all believe this and that he did not act alone.  But she does not say “in the murder of my brother” she says “in what happened to my brother”. 

@1:38 – She continues, “He’s to be held accountable for what happened to my brother and he WILL be held accountable for what happened to my brother.  But I want you to know one thing.  He was not alone in this.”

Agreed.  But she still does not pair Murray with a murder in this statement.

@1:48 – She goes on, “I want you to know when I say ‘fall guy’ that’s exactly what he is and was.  There are other people that are behind this, that did this.  Dr. Murray took the rap for it and he should be (proceeded?) for it because he was instrumental but we must get to the bottom and find exactly who did it.”

Find out who did what?

@2:09 – She’s talking a lot with her hands.  “You know, your intuitions told you at the very beginning.  Don’t let that leave you.  What happened is the truth.  What you know is the truth.  You must remember I said something earlier that this whole case was like an Illusionist. 

Here we go, she mentions “The Illusionist”. But before that she says something key . . . “your intuitions told you at the very beginning”. Then she said “What happened is the truth” and she said “What you know is the truth.”  What this tells me is that she is leaving the truth to the individual mind.  This is an argument for “his truth, her truth” which I’ve had battles with commenters on my blog about this in the past.  This reminds me of a Bible passage that I’ve posted before.  It’s 2 Thessalonians 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:  and it also says it in Isaiah 66:4 I also will choose their delusions, and will bring their fears upon them; because when I called, none did answer; when I spake, they did not hear: but they did evil before mine eyes, and chose that in which I delighted not.

“…I also will choose their delusions”.  You may disagree with me on this one, but Latoya is not telling us all this in such a fashion just for her health.

@2:24 – She goes on, “It’s like the movie the Illusionist and when I say that to you I say it because we’re all concentrating and focusing on this right hand.  We’re not paying attention to what this left hand is doing.  When we were in court, we were presented with the right hand.  The left hand is what was instrumental in getting rid of my brother”.

This is very important.  If we were presented in court with “the right hand” then those not participating in court are the left hand . . . The right hand is throwing the stones to hide the left.

@2:46 – “And those very people that were in court, they know this and they covered it up and they hid it because they didn’t want you, you, you or you (she points to various people in the audience), to know this is what really happened!  My brother and I promise you and I will tell you this, they murdered him, he was murdered, this was no mistake and yet they let someone else take the rap.

She does not name any names and does not say WHAT people in court know and tried to cover it up.  Here she finally says the word “murdered”.  She does not say who was murdered. She does not put it together in this particular sentence.   She promises that they murdered him?  I didn’t get that quite, but onto more pertinent things.  You could also say, because of the way she put this sentence together, that her brother murdered somebody.  She said this was “no mistake”.  This could be in reference to Murray and a possible accident, or that it was planned.  Whatever happened, I agree . . . it was planned.

@3:06 – “They altered everything.  I asked for the surveillance tape of who came in and out of Michael’s house and the police told me no.  What did they do?”  (and she points the microphone toward the audience.  They shout various answers, among them ‘erased the tape’), Latoya then answers “erased it all!  You are so right!  You know why?  Because they know!  They know who was on that tape.  They know who walked in that room.  They know who went in there and injected Michael.  But I was there the first day he passed.  The coroner came back and told me and Mr. Phillips (this is Jeffre she is gesturing to?) somebody injected Michael with Propofol intentionally to kill him.”

They altered everything.  Now that’s an interesting statement.  Further down she says that somebody “injected Michael with Propofol” intentionally to kill him.  Here, she says TO KILL him but doesn’t pair this statement with the result (whatever that is).  The surveillance tape she mentions the police erasing it. Then below it gets good.

@3:41 – “This is something you don’t do in your home, and it was done all at night (sounds like night), whoever did this intentionally murdered him and this is what they did.  I will say this to you, I don’t wish to get anyone in trouble, but I will say this . . . In the very beginning when this case started, AEG asked to be a part of this case. 

Again, we get from Latoya that someone did this intentionally.  Then she says something interesting.  She says she doesn’t want to get anyone in trouble, but that “at the very beginning”  when “this case started”, she says “AEG asked to be part of this case”.

Okay, when did this case start?  Because the Conspiracy Michael talks about was mentioned by him back in 2001 for the first time at an Al Sharpton Function.  On national television for the first time Michael mentioned the conspiracy on the 2003 Ed Bradley interview.  If we are talking specifically to “The Illusion”  then AEG asking to be part of “the case” means more than just two people working for AEG testifying in court.  Just what does this mean?

@4:08 – “Now let me say something to you.  When there is someone who’s an artist, you’re the promoter and the artist is no longer with us, you walk away.  Why did you ask the judge, why would you make a (I have no idea what she said here, why did you make a why?) to be a part of this case and you want to be here?  When you’re in court the first thing you say to the judge is that ‘we’re very good friends with the Los Angeles Police Department, you do understand that don’t you judge?’  and of course the judge says ‘yes I do’.  I saw right through what was going on.

Here what Latoya said gets a little garbled trying to hear with the yelling people.  She’s asking why a promoter would want to be part of a case, but then she says that someone said we’re very good friends with the L.A. police department.  But she doesn’t say WHO said this.  Did AEG say this and if so WHO in AEG?  If not AEG then who else?  She doesn’t want to get anyone in trouble, she tells us that the right hand doesn’t want us to see what the left is doing, but then she presents us with the right hand . . . Two playing this game?

@4:41 – “I knew what was going on, why should they be a part of this?  They are the ones that Michael said (I wish people would shut up, it sounds like she said ‘they are the ones that Michael said would murder you).  They are the ones, I’m not saying AEG, I’m saying these people that surrounded themselves . . . These people that he did NOT want any longer in his life.  I will say this (she says this a lot before making a point we need to pay attention to), every last one of them is (left?  People are yelling, they must not be interested in what she has to say). 

Again who is “THEY”?  AEG?  She knows what is going on, so tell us?  But she doesn’t.  If it is TRUE that she said “Michael said they are the ones that would murder you” . . . (or murder him), then this is NOT AEG, because Michael said this long before AEG was in his life.  She also completes this by telling us that she’s NOT saying AEG but “these people that surrounded themselves”, leaves the sentence half finished before continueing with “the people he did not want any longer in his life.   This part is a mess, but that is what I am getting out of it.  I did not hear clearly her last sentence.

@5:04 - “There was someone in that house that night when my brother came home.  Do you guys know who that someone is or was?  (some people yell Tommy Mottola, some yell Randy Phillips)  . . . and Michael didn’t know it.”  Then Latoya says, “Michael did not know that THIS MAN she just said, was in that house.  He didn’t have a clue.  But the reason I know he was in the house, I didn’t see him, but the reason I know is someone in the house told me they let him in.  And I said, where was, I won’t say who it was, but I said where was you’re dad?  He said ‘my dad was at rehearsals’.  Then I said ‘well where did you go?’ ‘I went to bed, it was late and he was still there.’  So, (whispers) what happened to my brother?”

Latoya never commits to a name and I don’t know which one of the shouts she responded to.  Randy Phillips according to court testimony was till at Staples when Michael left.  Randy Phillips also testified to Michael telling him “You got me this far,  I can take it from here . . .” that does not sound like something Randy Phillips would just make up to throw in there if he expected to be at rehearsals the next day.  It DOES most definitely sound like something Michael would say if he was saying “goodbye and thank you” to someone who helped him.

Now on the latter half of this, Latoya does say that she spoke to the person who let this unknown person in the house.   And this person refers to “dad” being at rehearsals when this person let the guy in, so we are to assume that this was one of Michael’s children that let this person in.  This does not sound like Michael’s children, do they answer the door in the middle of the night?  Latoya says she won’t say who it was.  This could have been anybody but someone the children would assume would be okay to let in at a late hour?  How did they get past security?  We know security testified AGAINST Murray, so who would Security be covering for?

Remember, the right hand was presented at court.  Where did security get their jobs?  Who interviewed security?  Where did at least two of them work before getting the job with Michael?  Security Measures in L.A. which is now shut down.

@6:05 – Latoya continues “I wasn’t there, I don’t know, I don’t know if Randy Phillips did it or not, but I’m telling you, I was told, I was told this, that he was in that house.  I am not accusing anyone, but I am saying, keep your eyes open.  You watch everything.  It’s very important that we do this.”  (through cheers), “I am not accusing anyone, I will reassure you and let you know that, because I wasn’t there.  But I will say this,”  (again with the “I will say this”), “There were people in that house and now he is no longer here.  These people that were in that house are getting away with this, and I believe, a part of me believes that Murray truly knows what happened.  I truly believe that.  That he truly knows what happened and he’s not speaking, of course.  So I’m hoping and urging that somebody will know something and will definitely come out and speak the truth. 

Here Latoya says she doesn’t know if Randy Phillips did it or not, but that she WAS TOLD THIS, THAT HE WAS IN THE HOUSE.  Does she mean Randy Phillips?  She says she is not accusing anyone, so why the big speech?  Randy Phillips was at the trial.  Is he the right hand or the left hand?

What other people were in that house?  If these people were instrumental in “what happened” to her brother, then what exactly happened?  Moving on . . .

@7:02 – “Whether it’s a paralegal, whether it’s a girlfriend, whether it’s a colleague,  whether it’s a secretary, but anybody that’s involved with these people that know what happened, they need to come forward and speak the truth. Because this is not right and its not fair.  You can’t go around doing this to other people and getting away with it, its just not right.  So I’m asking all of you, let’s just please stick together, work together and find out what truly happened, because it’s not over. This is not over.  This is what . . . this is what this right hand wants you to believe, while the left hand did everything.  Don’t buy the media with the right hand.  This is what they put, what they impregnate (good word!) in our minds so we can believe this.  Don’t believe it, please.  I love you, thank you VERY much (Reverend Fox?).  You have been wonderful, you have been so wonderful with your support. Continue to speak the truth.  Please do, please do.”

Then at the very end she leans over to someone in the front row and says “Of course”.  At the very end of the video the statement “1st Choicelocations TV, Los Angeles, CA, November 20, 2011. 

Now this parting monologue I get the feeling that she is talking about more than June 25, 2009 with her declaration that “you can’t go around doing this to other people and getting away with it.”  She says to work together and find out what truly happened, but SHE KNOWS what truly happened.  She knows better than anyone in this audience.  She’s not asking this for her benefit because she already knows.  She wants US TO FIND OUT.

This is the only way we are ever going to learn for sure what Michael’s conspiracy is about.  She also said “this is not over” (no kidding).  This “is what THIS right hand wants you to believe, while the left hand did everything”.

Well she presented the right hand and the right hand, including Randy Phillips/AEG which she not only presented but claims they wanted to be “part of this case”, is the right hand.  The right hand wants you to believe that they did it?


Ortega stated both in interviews and in court, that Michael was excited about the Illusion the next day.  Latoya makes reference to the “Illusion” and “The Illusionist”.   The right hand of the Illusionist wants you to believe what the right hand is presenting, so you don’t see what the left hand is doing.

Is there any question at all, on this blog, just who the ILLUSIONIST is?