Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: The Prophetic Message In Michael’s Who Is It

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Thursday, November 10, 2011

The Prophetic Message In Michael’s Who Is It

Who Is It? A Secret so Untrue
Michael Jackson’s Agony in Biblical Perspective

I'm sorry for the stupid remix but apparently there is a reason SONY took off all the ORIGINAL "Who is It" videos.  Imagery.   Who is it?  Who is Michael talking about?  Is Michael telling a story God wants us to know?  Is "she" God's Israel?  Is "she" the "Whore of Babylon"?





Habakkuk 2:1-4, 8-10
1I will stand upon my watch, and set me upon the tower, and will watch to see what he will say unto me, and what I shall answer when I am reproved.  2And the LORD answered me, and said, Write the vision, and make it plain upon tables, that he may run that readeth it.  3For the vision is yet for an appointed time, but at the end it shall speak, and not lie: though it tarry, wait for it; because it will surely come, it will not tarry.   4Behold, his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith.”

8Because thou hast spoiled many nations, all the remnant of the people shall spoil thee; because of men's blood, and for the violence of the land, of the city, and of all that dwell therein.  9Woe to him that coveteth an evil covetousness to his house, that he may set his nest on high, that he may be delivered from the power of evil!  10Thou hast consulted shame to thy house by cutting off many people, and hast sinned against thy soul.


It’s Really Not Worth It


Is truth a game, daddy, To win the fame baby, It’s all the same baby…” Michael Jackson, Morphine.


I found a source from which I branched off my research using their key words to find collaborating events in history.

I have been waiting for the end of Murray’s trial to finally get back into this.  Most of what I am going to post below is taking from one web site, with references to other sites.  I will post comments and try to correspond with what it says in the Bible which is my basis for the truth.

Let’s go back to the conspiracy mentioned by Michael in his latter interviews.

@2:27 – The word Conspiracy makes
An entry onto Michael’s World Stage
For the first time

He announces his intent.  It wasn’t publicized much, except in a “he’s crazy” light and this got minimal press.  His music was being misinterpreted by his label and those writing in industry rags, so he went public.

Between 2001 and 2002, Michael came out of the web and was brushing the strands from him. Then the 2003 allegations, the raid and the arrest.  Then this happened:

2003 – The first time he actually publicly
Used the Word Conspiracy in an interview

Next was the interview with Geraldo, during the course of the trial.  Michael was incredibly thin here but not drugged, not incoherent and not even nervous.  Considering the testimony of Latoya and what they did to her food, it is no wonder Michael had trouble eating.  How can you when you don’t know of your own hired help is drugging your food or not?



Geraldo Interview, Part 1

In this interview, Michael sounds strong, during the trial of his life, not drugged, not incoherent.

Below, the last interview in which Michael mentions the “conspiracy”.  He gave this interview in 2005 via phone, during the trial.  “I can’t comment on it but there is a lot of conspiracy, I say there is a LOT of conspiracy going on right now, as we speak about that.”  Jesse asks if the conspiracy is about the catalog and Michael says, “Well, you know I don’t , I don’t want to comment.  I don’t want to make a comment, Jesse, uh – it’s a real delicate issue, and uh, I’ll let you – I’ll let you uh, make the comment on that one.”


While the trial was ongoing
Jesse Jackson Radio  Interview
Part 4 – Load of info in this, also took place
During the trial

Latoya immediately after June 25th talked about a conspiracy and that it was more than just Murray.  Constant references after that to Murray being a fall guy.  When “This is It” came out, this scene below was in the film:

Michael’s “Four Years to Get it Right, or
It’s irreversible, the damage we’ve done.”

Jermaine said it too.

Jermaine at 0:34 – Conspiracy
American Government, The FBI
Michael got too powerful . . .
@2:19 – He says “conspiracy” again.

Yes, he did mention the publishing catalog, but read between the lines . . . was the government and the FBI really after a publishing catalog?  No.



Spelunking into the Rabbit Hole

Over the course of the spring and the summer, we’ve taken this blog behind curtain of the wizards – those running Hollywood. We’ve connected sexual, physical and psychological abuses to Hollywood and the music industry.  We’ve connected the advent of those industries to CIA Mind control and MK Ultra/Monarch programming. We’ve connected CIA mind control to various institutions of schooling and medical study in this country to Tavistock and Tavistock to the Nazi doctors and the experiment’s they’ve run which helped develop our psychiatric and pharmaceutical industries.

We’ve connected Nazi Doctors and World War II to those that planned most of the wars in the last 100 years or more, which currently run our international banking systems.  We’ve connected the bankers to the Khazarian Empire and the Babylonian Talmud to the modern day Pharisee – your Rabbi’s back through the time of Jesus when they were giving HIM a hard time and conspiring to kill HIM.

Now that I’ve summarized January through today of 2011 on this blog, I am posting the history below.  I will leave most of it to this writer of the web site below, but I will copy various excerpts with the links to those pages. This way if you want to read more, just click the linked “source”.


THE CONSPIRACY OFFSPRING

This conspiracy actually began with the temptation of Eve and Adam.  It took root with the first murderer, Cain.  It was eliminated through the flood and took root again with Noah’s sons and their offspring. 

It continued to grow through Abraham’s son Esau and some of Jacob’s sons (Levites) some who lived in Edom.  Moses on the mountain with the seventy elders below with Aaron conspiring to build their own God (impatience with the time God took with Moses on the mountain), and the lie that began with the oral law which grew into the Babylonian Talmud.

Jesus faced down these same liars, thieves and conspirators during his ministry.  They conspired to put Jesus to death, but had to use the Romans to do it (because direct murder was against their laws, but manipulating others to do it was not against their laws).  God’s will allowed for this evil to happen because Jesus was the only way we were ever going to see justice.  All we had to do was believe and remember the price he paid.

As the apostles began putting together the congregations of believers and Paul set about planting the churches, they conspired against him too.  Every one of the apostles was either jailed, tortured or crucified, hung or beheaded.

When the power of the truth could not be squelched and the faith of those men reached the hearts of people, the conspirators had to find another way to corrupt the movement.  So they infiltrated and took control through intrigue, flatteries and bribery, blackmail and soon organized religion took the place of the gathering of the faithful. 

This grew through all countries, ethnicities and other religions began to spring up to ‘correct’ the teaching of Christ.  Rumors of corruption of the scripture began and were spread.  You know what amazes me?  None of this controversy follows the other religious texts.  Not the Koran, not the Talmud, not the book of Kabbalah, not Hinduism, not Buddhism.  The Bible is always the one under attack.  Why?

Because the devil does not like the truth.

As the history of man on this planet matured, and the “whore of Babylon” intertwined her way through the merchants, governments, schools and industries of the planet, we will continue with the history they did not want you to know.

740 AD - 1818

“In 740 A.D. in a land locked between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, known as Khazaria, a land which today is predominantly occupied by Georgia, but also reaches into Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Hungary, and Romania, the modern Jewish race is born. A modern Jewish race that incidentally is not Jewish.”  Source

King Bulan would not live to see his Asiatic race of converts to Judaism, one day represent 90% of all the Jews on the planet.  He would not witness their adoption of the term Ashkenazi Jews to identify themselves.  They were in fact not Jews, but simply an Asiatic race of people who converted to the Jewish religion.

They continued to speak the Khazarian language of Yiddish, totally different to the language of Hebrew.

They would evolve over generations to spawn the Rothschild dynasty in Germany, and they would usurp the wealth of the world through deception and intrigue, gaining control of the world’s money supply.

Revelation 18:3-4, 7, 10-11, 23
3For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies.   4And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.

7How much she hath glorified herself, and lived deliciously, so much torment and sorrow give her: for she saith in her heart, I sit a queen, and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow.  10Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come.  11And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more:

   23And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.

Oliver Cromwell obtains backing from the British parliament for the execution of King Charles I on a charge of treason.  England is not the first country to expel the Jews.”  Source, scroll down there is a list of countries - Source

In 1688 – “Thirty-three years after Cromwell had let the Jews into Britain a Dutch Prince arrived from Amsterdam surrounded by a whole swarm of Jews from that Jewish financial centre. Driving his royal father-in-law out of the kingdom, he graciously consented to ascend the throne of Britain. A very natural result following on this event was the inauguration of the National Debt by the establishment six years later of the Bank of England for the purpose of lending money to the Crown. Britain had paid her way as she went until the Jew converts arrived.”  Source

In 1694 – “The deceptively named, “Bank of England,” is founded. It is deceptively named as it gives the impression it is controlled by the Government of England when in fact it is a private institution founded by Jews. In his book, “The Breakdown of Money,” published in 1934, Christopher Hollis explains the formation of the Bank of England, as follows,”  Read more

In 1744 – “On February 23rd, Mayer Amschel Bauer, an Ashkenazi Jew, is born in Frankfurt, Germany, the son of Moses Amschel Bauer, a money lender and the proprietor of a counting house. 

Moses Amschel Bauer places a red sign above the entrance door to his counting house. This sign is a red hexagram (that geometrically and numerically translates into the number 666), which under Rothschild instruction will end up on the Israeli flag some two centuries later.”  Source


Rothschild Shield


Israel Symbol.



Whore of Babylon infiltrates the Churches
Across the world



Part 2 tomorrow.


11 comments:

  1. @BONNIE - Your historical resumé, in spite of what we learnt here from the past is always englighting & refreshing for our memories.

    From a gossip link below, is a pic of Frank Cascio with Rabbi Schmuley stating they are good friends, also with Roger Friedman :

    Message of 02.01.2011 at 12:37 - Nr. 69
    http://www.lipstickalley.com/f227/wow-frank-cascios-signed-book-deal-279235/index5.html

    A few ones under, Frank writes on his FB page that the proceeds of his book will be used for charity abroad in Michael's name: OK. Anyway how come F. Cascio is so well acquainted with these two Michael's traitors ?!

    Now the heat of the trial verdict slows down, books & documentaries plus "Michael was a child molester" declarations, all re-emerge like poisonous flowers: Nauseating ! D.A. Dooley should have also abstained to impose himself publicly after the verdict for his presence & demeanor, instead of gloryfying the LA Justice reached the opposite, even Murray is no good guy.

    Apart from the events of the 06.25.2009, it's to wonder at times if Michael, in spite of his TII tours & other great projects, would have survived any much longer, because of 1) continuous daily Propofol treatments during the London tours might have killed him soon or late & 2) whatever he undertook, he was constantly "surrounded" by "Michael is/was my friend" types of guys, incl. C. Murray who now also capitalizes on it (next: memories' book?). But Bonnie, if Michael escaped that mud, OK:o) Just THEY were too many :o((

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bonnie,
    I know you are going to blast me (again! LOL) but Michael's 2001 speech was about the suppression of black history, and the conspiracy around that. How the contribution of black artists is wiped from history, how a black man is not 'allowed' to become powerful in his own right.
    His other two conspiracy speeches were about the conspiracy of the Arvizo allegations, and yes I DO think they are linked.
    But the rest is speculation. It may be insightful speculation, but we don't know the true facts because Michael couldn't talk about it, for obvious reasons. Even his songs are open to interpretation.
    I also believe the TII speech was about the planet. Michael has been a passionate green for decades, and fans all know this. Earth Song and the bulldozer onstage are the clues to what message Michael had for the fans. Why would they rehearse those and Heal The World, if Michael had another message? Perhaps you or someone can suggest which song was going to be in TII that covered the other message? Wouldn't fans feel preached to if there were two messages in TII? The bulldozer ending is sobering enough after the Earth Song film sequence, so is Michael likely to top this with more ?? I think even he would know that was overkill.
    A lot of fans have gone on about 'other messages' in TII, not just you Bonnie, and I can't see it. There wouuld be a danger of watering down the message if you mix it with other messages.
    (sits back and waits for the blasting!)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bonnie – I too heard that Dr. Murray’s defense team is preparing to appeal the conviction. In my opinion, I don’t think the appeal is going to be successful on the basis the Jury found him guilty.

    Yesterday, on Good Morning America, one of the Jury layout three reasons that lead them to guilty verdict:
    1 – not calling 911.
    2 - not having proper equipment to revive his patient in case of emergency.
    3 - living his patient alone without having someone to monitor him in his absence.

    I said, this Jury is smart, really smart to live the controversial issue aside, who gave Michael the final fatal dose that killed him? She did not even mention the acute Propofol intoxication the autopsy showed and can only happen with drip infusion or 25mg Propofol the doctor claimed he only gave him.

    Some of Dr. Murray supporters were shouting loud during the trial saying “if there is no drip, you must acquit” did not hold water for them. Again, the guilty verdict has nothing to do with propoflol drip or other sedatives Michael received. So on what basis the defense is going to appeal since the three reasons above really happened?

    Can’t wait to hear more Jurors talk about what went on the deliberation room and how they reach their verdict.
    Mimi

    ReplyDelete
  4. Line said - "A few ones under, Frank writes on his FB page that the proceeds of his book will be used for charity abroad in Michael's name: OK. Anyway how come F. Cascio is so well acquainted with these two Michael's traitors ?!"

    ............ And how many have made that claim? Remember Erin Jacobs? Remember me calling the charity she said she was giving money to and no one there ever heard of her? (Not Justice4MJ either). I have some more information on the Cascios but I'm waiting to put it up. First things first.

    You are not the only one seeing that the worms are coming out of the woodwork now that they think the "fall guy" has paid for their crime. I also want to caution you that the Cascios COULD BE playing with the devil. That possibility exists - But I'm feeling no, these "friendships" even if faked, do not explain how and why the Cascios had no trouble gaining access to Michael all the years his own family could not.

    It will probably get worse before people see who is who in Michael's life.
    ----------------------------------------------

    PrincessGlam said - "Michael's 2001 speech was about the suppression of black history, and the conspiracy around that. How the contribution of black artists is wiped from history, how a black man is not 'allowed' to become powerful in his own right."


    ........ No, I agree with this, for the most part. This conspiracy included separating and keeping the black man from controlling or owning what the powers didn't want out of THEIR control. But that is not the ONLY thing Michael said. He talked about a conspiracy. The conspiracy was not just about the black man and not just about the music industry. He talks of lying history books and lying press. They did not just lie about the black man. He also said "all races" if you listen to the whole speech.

    You said - "His other two conspiracy speeches were about the conspiracy of the Arvizo allegations, and yes I DO think they are linked.
    But the rest is speculation."

    ....... Really? So his songs are speculation? "Be Not Always" is a lie?, "Jam" is a lie?, "We've had enough" is about the plants and trees?

    Do you debate that Michael's film "Earth Song" (the original one) showed people coming back to life? Do you believe that Michael advocated the raping, torturing and killing of children for the benefit of depopulation, and killing people with plastics in food, and pharmeceuticals to get the population of the earth below 500 million?

    Princess, if you are going to sparse Michael's message for your own political preferences don't do it here. There was MORE than a bulldozer pictured in that film. And the images on his STAGE ACT was not a bulldozer but a tank . . . a machine of war . . . for PROFIT.

    What about the winds blowing and things being renewed in the film? If not God's work than what do YOU think it was?

    Michael's love WAS about the planet - ALL OF IT. God didn't just create trees, he created PEOPLE, and there has been unfettered destruction of BOTH in the name of control, money and enslavement.

    There is no doubt THAT is all through his songs. If you think TII was the only place Michael ever performed Earth Song and you can't "see" the message then try watching the film he did.

    You saying what you just said really sells Michael short - and that pisses me off, but that's as much blasting as you're going to get from me. I can't make you see his message. I only know that there has been just as much attempts to screw with his message as they did they did the pathetic songs they put in the "Michael" album.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @PrincessGlam-In reference to Earth Song-What good is saving the planet if there are no People? If you listen to the song the entire background vocals"What about Us" "What about Us?"Peace.Linda

    ReplyDelete
  6. I saw this (heard it?) and wanted to pass it on. It is Michael talking to "Ebony".

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvK4RkvqFhI

    ReplyDelete
  7. BONNIE said : "Michael's love WAS about the planet - ALL OF IT."

    The profit run of the Elite, governmental & corporate, is indeed the base for created wars & the destruction of the humanity & the Nature. But please, Bonnie & Princess, Peace & Love. Said by me..:o(

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mimi said - "In my opinion, I don’t think the appeal is going to be successful on the basis the Jury found him guilty."

    Well, yes, but that is if they use only the evidence THIS COURT allowed them to use. Appeals don't normally happen without further discovery added to the evidence.

    I saw that juror interviewed. Now according to what I heard about the documentary, Murray practically begged security to call 911, he had his hands full administering to Michael. Since we did not hear him testify, we never heard that in this court, and of course with Murray sitting there and listening to each body guard testifying that HE didn't call 911, I doubt Murray thought for a second that they would do that to him.

    "1 – not calling 911.
    2 - not having proper equipment to revive his patient in case of emergency.
    3 - living his patient alone without having someone to monitor him in his absence.

    2 - IF he did not have the equipment there (since the house was open for four days, anyone could have removed the equipment), but if he didn't have any there, on this point I agree.

    3 - If he actually left him alone for more than the two minutes. I'm not sure I agree with this because Murray testified that he didn't leave until the propofol would have been out of Michael's system, he sat there for twenty to thirty minutes he said AFTER administration. HOWEVER the other sedatives he gave him also contributed, so says Dr. Shafer.

    One other thing that bothers me . . . the woman juror they interviewed is a paralegal. What firm does she work for? Anyone know?

    I don't agree with this either:

    So on what basis the defense is going to appeal since the three reasons above really happened?"

    ....... They never proved a drip for the 25th. and we had a house that was open for four days with detectives, family members and guards in and out of that house. Pictures were taken that showed evidence was left behind and tampered with, so I don't buy that.

    I know there has been argument that Murray said he did Propofol drip the other days he had Michael on the propofol, BUT Michael did NOT have it on the 23rd, 24th and Murray did not PLAN on using it on the 25th either, so given the testimony from him, the timing of the other medications AND Murray himself stating the times Michael complained when he woke back up, he didn't really have time to set up a drip.

    The syringe was LEFT IN THE PORT that submitted to the coroner, so we can't have both.

    There was no propofol in the tubing and there was no tube for a second infusion line. To me that is not proof there was a drip.

    My ONLY hangup with this whole scenario is that propofol was given at home in the first place. Michael, I love you, but if you had asked me for it, I would have told you NO, no and double no . . . and given you a back rub instead - GUARANTEED you would have fallen asleep. Just ask my husband! :o)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Line said - "The profit run of the Elite, governmental & corporate, is indeed the base for created wars & the destruction of the humanity & the Nature. But please, Bonnie & Princess, Peace & Love. Said by me..:o( "

    ....... I'm good. I just want to know if Princess believes that Michael cared about THINGS over people and what she thought "Be Not Always" was about?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Commenting on the Geraldo interview, Michael is asked whether his faith helps him, and he replies twice ''of course it does, of course it does....''. Geraldo talks about how Michael was the victim of many media malicious rumours, and Michael said that he was very strong, gestures with his hands that he is human, but that he has the skin of a rhino. :-)
    Now I am in absolute AWE of Michael's solid strength of attitude and character. Only earlier this eve I was sickened to hear a part of a chat show programme (UK.) Things that were said I will not repeat, but it was really nasty and dishonouring to Michael. The chat show host made reference to the trial,and said some very degrading things about Michael to his 2 'guests' on the stage next to him, as they addressed their remarks to a live audience.
    It made me feel so mad and upset, but Michael had to live with this daily, and much worse......that's why I am in awe of him, I wish my faith was as strong as his....
    Love Jenny

    ReplyDelete
  11. Mimi said - "In my opinion, I don’t think the appeal is going to be successful on the basis the Jury found him guilty."

    Bonnie said: "Well, yes, but that is if they use only the evidence THIS COURT allowed them to use. Appeals don't normally happen without further discovery added to the evidence."

    Actually Mimi is correct. An appeal does not look at new evidence. The appeal judges cannot review questions of fact. The judges do not reassess the credibility of witnesses. There are no oral arguments. The only thing an appeal does is that the appeal judges review the written record to determine if the lower court properly interpreted the law and used correct procedures when considering the case. I mean think about it, when people on death row claim they find new evidence and want it heard, do you know how difficult it is for that new evidence to be heard? Especially by an appeal court.

    No, I think this conviction is going to stand, unless the appeals panel finds something grossly in error regarding the law or procedures. And if they do, Murray will be retried; he won't automatically be freed.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.