Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Revisiting Michael Jackson's "This Is It"

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Monday, November 28, 2011

Revisiting Michael Jackson's "This Is It"

November 28, 2011
What We Didn’t Catch about “This is It”
Michael Jackson’s Bible Verses Again

I broke back into the Gospels in the Bible in my daily reading, from the minor prophets in the Old Testament, and as I read through the one page explaining the transition (400 years between the old and new Testaments), I read down the summarization, as I always do, of the books of the new Testament.  As I read through this I caught a reference to the book of John, and the partial passage “I’m the light of the world”. 

I ran to my computer and pulled up a song I hadn’t listened to probably since 2009, when it first made waves.  A song next to no one paid much attention to other than it was the first new song people had heard Michael sing in years.  The controversy surrounding it though, reminded me very much of the right hand keeping people distracted from what the left hand is doing.  (Thanks LaToya!  God bless you!)

What happened next?  I pulled up the song on Youtube and found one with the lyrics and I listened to it in its entirety.

Then I listened to it again.  Then I listened to it a third time and I realized that much like “Dangerous”, there were parts of Bible passages in this song.

I remember in the beginning of this “case” as Latoya calls it, one of the first “newer” songs that was leaked out (after Michael’s passing) for the “concerts” was “This is It”.  It was leaked on youtube and the forum and other forums Sony ran.

This is It
With Lyrics

These Bible verses are referenced in the very first stanza of this song:

“This is it . . . here I stand . . .”

1And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.

“I’m the light of the world, I feel grand . . .”

12Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.

In reference to the number “a thousand” and “a thousand years”, this is also in the Bible, ironically in Revelation, three times:

“And it feels as though I’ve seen your face a thousand times…”

Revelation 20:2
And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,

“And I feel as though I’ve known you since a thousand years . . .”

Revelation 20:3
And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.

“And if feels as though I’ve known you for a thousand years . . .”  (Michael’s lyrics to this song are here – Source)

Revelation 20:4
And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

There is also  this in verse five:

Revelation 20:5
But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.

The rest of Michael’s song is rather personal and can be interpreted as either Michael singing about his love for Christ, or expressing what Christ wanted to tell us.  It could be interpreted a number of ways, but there are two lines that caught my attention, only because of the dreams I’ve had:

And you tell me that you’ve seen my face before . . .

And –

And you said you saw my face yourself

This could be taken personally, by any believer in Jesus, whether you dreamed of him or whether you’ve seen his face in any of God’s creation.  And before people go getting half-cocked on the lines referencing “I never thought that I would be your lover”, consider that even Jesus talked about the marriage of the bride and the bridegroom – Christ and his church, which all of the elect would attend the wedding feast.  Jesus also talked about “becoming one” with his church and us becoming “one” with him and of “one mind” with him.

Matthew 25:1
Then shall the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom.

Revelation 18:23
And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.

Revelation 21:2
And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.

Revelation 21:9
And there came unto me one of the seven angels which had the seven vials full of the seven last plagues, and talked with me, saying, Come hither, I will shew thee the bride, the Lamb's wife.

Revelation 22:17
And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is at thirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.

This kind of pure love, for Jesus who loved us first and enough to die for us, for those that can see, and see his face and to be able to witness Michael’s translation of this in this beautiful song  (No, I am not going to run away).  Could Michael have been singing for Christ, telling us the time is near?

There are even references to “This is It”, that exact phrasing in the Bible:

Genesis 49:28
All these are the twelve tribes of Israel: and this is it that their father spake unto them, and blessed them; every one according to his blessing he blessed them.

In Genesis, introducing the 12 Tribes of Israel, of which shall number as the sand in the sea, but a “remnant” shall be saved.  Of these twelve tribes, Judah, from where Jews came, will also a remnant be saved.

Leviticus 10:3
Then Moses said unto Aaron, This is it that the LORD spake, saying, I will be sanctified in them that come nigh me, and before all the people I will be glorified. And Aaron held his peace.

In this passage above, Moses admonishes Aaron for burning incense to foreign gods after the fire from God destroyed those who sought to make their own gods.

Numbers 8:24
This is it that belongeth unto the Levites: from twenty and five years old and upward they shall go in to wait upon the service of the tabernacle of the congregation:

This is it, what God told Moses that he would give Aaron the gift of the Levites to purify them and work in the tabernacles to cleanse the children of Israel.

What remnant is left of them could be the very reason not all of the children of Israel fell into the hands of the “Mystery of Babylon” and will be saved.  This is history I am still putting together given the disobedience of Israel throughout the Bible (really, of all of us).

During my conversation with Micheline, she brought up a very, VERY interesting point.  How did “This is It” come to be part of “the movie”  documentary “This Is It”?  Not one piece of footage do we see Michael performing this song.  It is not in the song lineup for the “concerts”, it is SPECIFICALLY ADDED TO THE MOVIE VERSION OF THIS “CASE”, as if they had PLANNED there to be a film and Michael wanted this song used.

How else could this get put in the Movie and how did Sony get a hold of it to put into the Movie?

Something else – at the beginning of the song, you hear Michael saying “one, two, three, four”.  While this could be something “they” decided to keep in a rather “unfinished” track by Michael’s standards, it also could allude to the “four years to get it right”.

We have covered other things in the Bible that our shadowy governments are trying to twist into their version of ‘controlled knowledge’ when in reality they control nothing. They are however keeping you from the truth by blocking your access to it with lies.

Republic Lost
Republic, Lost from lessig on Vimeo.

Michael tried to tell us the only way he could, about what they were doing to him and doing to us.  Michael was trying to warn us about this, but he was also trying to tell us about the bigger picture, beyond the material.

Once you kill a man’s spirit, the rest will usually soon follow, unless they can draw their strength from something greater than self.   This is where Michael and God embraced.  What Michael knew, he wanted to share with us because he knew what would happen if hope ever died.  The children Michael was trying to save?  Us.  All of us.

Knowledge was a big part of that.  Michael’s dreams included reaching the child through the very tools the conspirators were using to destroy us.  Music, entertainment, movies, games, resorts but instead of using these things to peel families from one another, Michael wanted to bring them back together.

Malachi 4:6
And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse.

Luke 1:17
And he shall go before him in the spirit and power of Elias, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to the wisdom of the just; to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.

Ephesians 6:4
And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

Colossians 3:21
Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged. 

Do you think Michael knew something we did not?

Michael’s dream to reach children and reconnect families was thwarted at every turn, with every partner.  Michael announced his intentions with Prince Al Waleed in 1996 at a press conference.  What happened?

Michael’s plan was to start a children’s hospital as far back as 1999. 

What happened?

Michael wanted to branch into video games and interactive multi-media.  The partnering with Stan Lee and Peter Paul from Marvel Comics is known to most of us because of this video of Michael’s tour of this studio in 2000:

Michael Intends to invest in Marvel Comics
(I know I’ve pointed this out in the past,
But Michael knows his paints just by looking
At them and that just impresses me with
Everything else he knows).

Note that both Stan Lee and Peter Paul are standing by Michael in various shots of this video as they tour him around the animation studio.

Now watch what happens to this business deal:

Stan Lee, Michael Jackson and
Another “FRIEND”, the Clintons?

Notice Michael Jackson’s name doesn’t even come up in this at ALL even though this is the very same business deal and the same timing.

Yeah, Michael and the Clinton’s were real good friends . . . who is the one that tried to tell me that in a comment?  Where are you?  The Clinton’s don’t have many friends who aren’t pushing up daisies.

Vince Foster Died over This

List of the Dead
Bush’s not the only crime family

By the way 1993, aside from the fact that Vince Foster lost his life, was also the same year that Michael was:

1.   Squired away to England for “intervention” (MK Ultra)
2.   Was accused by Evan Chandler of molesting his son
3.   Was strip-searched at his own home
4.   Was found by Jermaine and family hooked up to I.V’s in a hotel room in Taiwan.

And that’s just what we know.  If you remember, one of the other Clinton associates I reported on earlier, Marc Rich, who at the behest of Abe Foxman, was pardoned by Bill Clinton before he left office.  His ex-wife Denise Rich was involved in a fundraiser with both Schmuley Boteach and Michael’s “Heal the Kids”, who’s fundraiser Denise hosted was embezzled.  Source


He’s on the same “destroy people’s lives” agenda that the “Bush/Clinton/Bush” policies infected us with.

3 men who pulled down Wall Street-- where are they now?

Here's a quick look into the three former Fannie Mae executives who brought down Wall Street.

Franklin Raines was a Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Fannie Mae.  Raines was forced to retire from his position with Fannie Mae  when auditing discovered severe irregularities in Fannie Mae's accounting activities. At the time of his departure The Wall Street Journal noted, " Raines, who long defended the company's accounting despite mounting evidence that it wasn't proper, issued a statement late Tuesday conceding that "mistakes were made" and saying he would assume responsibility as he had earlier promised. News reports indicate the company was under growing pressure from regulators to shake up its management in the wake of findings that the company's books ran afoul of generally accepted accounting principles for four years."  Fannie Mae had to reduce its surplus by $9 billion.

Raines left with a "golden parachute valued at $240 Million in benefits. The Government filed suit against Raines when the depth of the accounting scandal became clear. . The Government noted, "The 101 charges reveal how the individuals improperly manipulated earnings to maximize their bonuses, while knowingly neglecting accounting systems and internal controls, misapplying over twenty accounting principles and misleading the regulator and the public. The Notice explains how they submitted six years of misleading and inaccurate accounting statements and inaccurate capital reports that enabled them to grow Fannie Mae in an unsafe and unsound manner."  These charges were made in 2006.  The Court ordered Raines to return $50 Million Dollars he received in bonuses based on the miss-stated Fannie Mae profits.

Net windfall . . . $190 million!

Tim Howard -  Was the Chief Financial Officer of Fannie Mae. Howard "was a strong internal proponent of using accounting strategies that would ensure a "stable pattern of earnings" at Fannie.In everyday English - he was cooking the books.  The Government Investigation determined that, "Chief Financial Officer, Tim Howard, failed to provide adequate oversight to key control and reporting functions within Fannie Mae,"

On June 16, 2006, Rep. Richard Baker, R-La., asked the Justice Department to investigate his allegations that two former Fannie Mae executives lied to Congress in October 2004 when they denied manipulating the mortgage-finance giant's income statement to achieve management pay bonuses. Investigations by federal regulators and the company's board of directors since concluded that management did manipulate 1998 earnings to trigger bonuses.. Raines and Howard resigned under pressure in late 2004.

Howard's Golden Parachute was estimated at $20 Million!

Jim Johnson -  A former executive at Lehman Brothers and who was later forced from his position as Fannie Mae CEO.   A look at the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight's May 2006report on mismanagement and corruption inside Fannie Mae, and you'll see some interesting things about Johnson. Investigators found that Fannie Mae had hidden a substantial amount of Johnson's 1998 compensation from the public, reporting that it was between $6 million and $7 million when it fact it was $21 million."   Johnson is currently under investigation for taking illegal loans from Countrywide while serving as CEO of Fannie Mae.

Johnson's Golden Parachute was estimated at $28 Million.

FRANKLIN RAINES? Raines works for the Obama Campaign as his Chief Economic Advisor.
TIM HOWARD?  Howard is a Chief Economic Advisor to Obama under Franklin Raines.
JIM JOHNSON?  Johnson was hired as a Senior Obama Finance Advisor and was selected to run Obama's Vice Presidential Search Committee.

So Michael’s “four years” to “get it right or it’s irreversible, the damage we’ve done” more than likely has to do with humanity then it does whether or not a tree is going to grow back where it was cut down.

Michael was a threat to these people because as Micheline said so eloquently in an email to me several weeks back when she sent me the accompanying video on his reception in Russia:

This is only one city on the planet, and Michael was received this way everywhere he went.

Bonnie, this is so much more than simple appreciation for the humanitarian work Michael does.  There are other people who do good work as well and I'm not trying to minimize their contributions, like Bono, U2, etc.  But this is different.  The more I look at the powerfully positive impact Michael had with heads of state, and the way they showed their unbridled admiration, the more I am seeing exactly why the system felt they had to destroy him.  There is no other reason in the world, other than the threat Michael posed to the plans for an oppressive One World Government.  No one else had the power to mobilize the masses the way Michael was able to.  He did it for the good of humanity - but since when does humanity count for anything in the corrupt world of power politics?”

“And at 19:20 on the timer, Michael is sitting at a large reception table with the host of the city and the press, and who is sitting next to him?  None other than members of the Cascio family!  You can see Mrs. Connie Cascio plain as day, and the two young kids sitting next to him are her children.  It might even be Dominic Cascio sitting next to Connie - don't forget this was 1993 and he was much younger then with no glasses.”

Michael’s Reception in Russia
Sorry, it’s in Russian But you
Can still read faces and see what
Micheline is talking about

The reaction of one young
Man as he recounts his meeting
With Michael at a
Russian Orphanage

Now, with all that above, what I promised you two days ago.  I did copy Latoya’s words to the best of my abilitly.  I will comment in between each time paragraph recorded.

Latoya’s Speech
Listen Carefully
November 20, 2011

@1:22 – She says “I want you to listen carefully when I say to you” (and she says this twice before continuing), “that we all want justice.  And that in the beginning, Dr. Murray was the fall guy.  And I will continue , and listen to me carefully . . . I will continue to say that he’s the fall guy.  He was instrumental in what happened to my brother.”

This is a good lead in.  Murray is the fall guy.  Yes, I think we all believe this and that he did not act alone.  But she does not say “in the murder of my brother” she says “in what happened to my brother”. 

@1:38 – She continues, “He’s to be held accountable for what happened to my brother and he WILL be held accountable for what happened to my brother.  But I want you to know one thing.  He was not alone in this.”

Agreed.  But she still does not pair Murray with a murder in this statement.

@1:48 – She goes on, “I want you to know when I say ‘fall guy’ that’s exactly what he is and was.  There are other people that are behind this, that did this.  Dr. Murray took the rap for it and he should be (proceeded?) for it because he was instrumental but we must get to the bottom and find exactly who did it.”

Find out who did what?

@2:09 – She’s talking a lot with her hands.  “You know, your intuitions told you at the very beginning.  Don’t let that leave you.  What happened is the truth.  What you know is the truth.  You must remember I said something earlier that this whole case was like an Illusionist. 

Here we go, she mentions “The Illusionist”. But before that she says something key . . . “your intuitions told you at the very beginning”. Then she said “What happened is the truth” and she said “What you know is the truth.”  What this tells me is that she is leaving the truth to the individual mind.  This is an argument for “his truth, her truth” which I’ve had battles with commenters on my blog about this in the past.  This reminds me of a Bible passage that I’ve posted before.  It’s 2 Thessalonians 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:  and it also says it in Isaiah 66:4 I also will choose their delusions, and will bring their fears upon them; because when I called, none did answer; when I spake, they did not hear: but they did evil before mine eyes, and chose that in which I delighted not.

“…I also will choose their delusions”.  You may disagree with me on this one, but Latoya is not telling us all this in such a fashion just for her health.

@2:24 – She goes on, “It’s like the movie the Illusionist and when I say that to you I say it because we’re all concentrating and focusing on this right hand.  We’re not paying attention to what this left hand is doing.  When we were in court, we were presented with the right hand.  The left hand is what was instrumental in getting rid of my brother”.

This is very important.  If we were presented in court with “the right hand” then those not participating in court are the left hand . . . The right hand is throwing the stones to hide the left.

@2:46 – “And those very people that were in court, they know this and they covered it up and they hid it because they didn’t want you, you, you or you (she points to various people in the audience), to know this is what really happened!  My brother and I promise you and I will tell you this, they murdered him, he was murdered, this was no mistake and yet they let someone else take the rap.

She does not name any names and does not say WHAT people in court know and tried to cover it up.  Here she finally says the word “murdered”.  She does not say who was murdered. She does not put it together in this particular sentence.   She promises that they murdered him?  I didn’t get that quite, but onto more pertinent things.  You could also say, because of the way she put this sentence together, that her brother murdered somebody.  She said this was “no mistake”.  This could be in reference to Murray and a possible accident, or that it was planned.  Whatever happened, I agree . . . it was planned.

@3:06 – “They altered everything.  I asked for the surveillance tape of who came in and out of Michael’s house and the police told me no.  What did they do?”  (and she points the microphone toward the audience.  They shout various answers, among them ‘erased the tape’), Latoya then answers “erased it all!  You are so right!  You know why?  Because they know!  They know who was on that tape.  They know who walked in that room.  They know who went in there and injected Michael.  But I was there the first day he passed.  The coroner came back and told me and Mr. Phillips (this is Jeffre she is gesturing to?) somebody injected Michael with Propofol intentionally to kill him.”

They altered everything.  Now that’s an interesting statement.  Further down she says that somebody “injected Michael with Propofol” intentionally to kill him.  Here, she says TO KILL him but doesn’t pair this statement with the result (whatever that is).  The surveillance tape she mentions the police erasing it. Then below it gets good.

@3:41 – “This is something you don’t do in your home, and it was done all at night (sounds like night), whoever did this intentionally murdered him and this is what they did.  I will say this to you, I don’t wish to get anyone in trouble, but I will say this . . . In the very beginning when this case started, AEG asked to be a part of this case. 

Again, we get from Latoya that someone did this intentionally.  Then she says something interesting.  She says she doesn’t want to get anyone in trouble, but that “at the very beginning”  when “this case started”, she says “AEG asked to be part of this case”.

Okay, when did this case start?  Because the Conspiracy Michael talks about was mentioned by him back in 2001 for the first time at an Al Sharpton Function.  On national television for the first time Michael mentioned the conspiracy on the 2003 Ed Bradley interview.  If we are talking specifically to “The Illusion”  then AEG asking to be part of “the case” means more than just two people working for AEG testifying in court.  Just what does this mean?

@4:08 – “Now let me say something to you.  When there is someone who’s an artist, you’re the promoter and the artist is no longer with us, you walk away.  Why did you ask the judge, why would you make a (I have no idea what she said here, why did you make a why?) to be a part of this case and you want to be here?  When you’re in court the first thing you say to the judge is that ‘we’re very good friends with the Los Angeles Police Department, you do understand that don’t you judge?’  and of course the judge says ‘yes I do’.  I saw right through what was going on.

Here what Latoya said gets a little garbled trying to hear with the yelling people.  She’s asking why a promoter would want to be part of a case, but then she says that someone said we’re very good friends with the L.A. police department.  But she doesn’t say WHO said this.  Did AEG say this and if so WHO in AEG?  If not AEG then who else?  She doesn’t want to get anyone in trouble, she tells us that the right hand doesn’t want us to see what the left is doing, but then she presents us with the right hand . . . Two playing this game?

@4:41 – “I knew what was going on, why should they be a part of this?  They are the ones that Michael said (I wish people would shut up, it sounds like she said ‘they are the ones that Michael said would murder you).  They are the ones, I’m not saying AEG, I’m saying these people that surrounded themselves . . . These people that he did NOT want any longer in his life.  I will say this (she says this a lot before making a point we need to pay attention to), every last one of them is (left?  People are yelling, they must not be interested in what she has to say). 

Again who is “THEY”?  AEG?  She knows what is going on, so tell us?  But she doesn’t.  If it is TRUE that she said “Michael said they are the ones that would murder you” . . . (or murder him), then this is NOT AEG, because Michael said this long before AEG was in his life.  She also completes this by telling us that she’s NOT saying AEG but “these people that surrounded themselves”, leaves the sentence half finished before continueing with “the people he did not want any longer in his life.   This part is a mess, but that is what I am getting out of it.  I did not hear clearly her last sentence.

@5:04 - “There was someone in that house that night when my brother came home.  Do you guys know who that someone is or was?  (some people yell Tommy Mottola, some yell Randy Phillips)  . . . and Michael didn’t know it.”  Then Latoya says, “Michael did not know that THIS MAN she just said, was in that house.  He didn’t have a clue.  But the reason I know he was in the house, I didn’t see him, but the reason I know is someone in the house told me they let him in.  And I said, where was, I won’t say who it was, but I said where was you’re dad?  He said ‘my dad was at rehearsals’.  Then I said ‘well where did you go?’ ‘I went to bed, it was late and he was still there.’  So, (whispers) what happened to my brother?”

Latoya never commits to a name and I don’t know which one of the shouts she responded to.  Randy Phillips according to court testimony was till at Staples when Michael left.  Randy Phillips also testified to Michael telling him “You got me this far,  I can take it from here . . .” that does not sound like something Randy Phillips would just make up to throw in there if he expected to be at rehearsals the next day.  It DOES most definitely sound like something Michael would say if he was saying “goodbye and thank you” to someone who helped him.

Now on the latter half of this, Latoya does say that she spoke to the person who let this unknown person in the house.   And this person refers to “dad” being at rehearsals when this person let the guy in, so we are to assume that this was one of Michael’s children that let this person in.  This does not sound like Michael’s children, do they answer the door in the middle of the night?  Latoya says she won’t say who it was.  This could have been anybody but someone the children would assume would be okay to let in at a late hour?  How did they get past security?  We know security testified AGAINST Murray, so who would Security be covering for?

Remember, the right hand was presented at court.  Where did security get their jobs?  Who interviewed security?  Where did at least two of them work before getting the job with Michael?  Security Measures in L.A. which is now shut down.

@6:05 – Latoya continues “I wasn’t there, I don’t know, I don’t know if Randy Phillips did it or not, but I’m telling you, I was told, I was told this, that he was in that house.  I am not accusing anyone, but I am saying, keep your eyes open.  You watch everything.  It’s very important that we do this.”  (through cheers), “I am not accusing anyone, I will reassure you and let you know that, because I wasn’t there.  But I will say this,”  (again with the “I will say this”), “There were people in that house and now he is no longer here.  These people that were in that house are getting away with this, and I believe, a part of me believes that Murray truly knows what happened.  I truly believe that.  That he truly knows what happened and he’s not speaking, of course.  So I’m hoping and urging that somebody will know something and will definitely come out and speak the truth. 

Here Latoya says she doesn’t know if Randy Phillips did it or not, but that she WAS TOLD THIS, THAT HE WAS IN THE HOUSE.  Does she mean Randy Phillips?  She says she is not accusing anyone, so why the big speech?  Randy Phillips was at the trial.  Is he the right hand or the left hand?

What other people were in that house?  If these people were instrumental in “what happened” to her brother, then what exactly happened?  Moving on . . .

@7:02 – “Whether it’s a paralegal, whether it’s a girlfriend, whether it’s a colleague,  whether it’s a secretary, but anybody that’s involved with these people that know what happened, they need to come forward and speak the truth. Because this is not right and its not fair.  You can’t go around doing this to other people and getting away with it, its just not right.  So I’m asking all of you, let’s just please stick together, work together and find out what truly happened, because it’s not over. This is not over.  This is what . . . this is what this right hand wants you to believe, while the left hand did everything.  Don’t buy the media with the right hand.  This is what they put, what they impregnate (good word!) in our minds so we can believe this.  Don’t believe it, please.  I love you, thank you VERY much (Reverend Fox?).  You have been wonderful, you have been so wonderful with your support. Continue to speak the truth.  Please do, please do.”

Then at the very end she leans over to someone in the front row and says “Of course”.  At the very end of the video the statement “1st Choicelocations TV, Los Angeles, CA, November 20, 2011. 

Now this parting monologue I get the feeling that she is talking about more than June 25, 2009 with her declaration that “you can’t go around doing this to other people and getting away with it.”  She says to work together and find out what truly happened, but SHE KNOWS what truly happened.  She knows better than anyone in this audience.  She’s not asking this for her benefit because she already knows.  She wants US TO FIND OUT.

This is the only way we are ever going to learn for sure what Michael’s conspiracy is about.  She also said “this is not over” (no kidding).  This “is what THIS right hand wants you to believe, while the left hand did everything”.

Well she presented the right hand and the right hand, including Randy Phillips/AEG which she not only presented but claims they wanted to be “part of this case”, is the right hand.  The right hand wants you to believe that they did it?


Ortega stated both in interviews and in court, that Michael was excited about the Illusion the next day.  Latoya makes reference to the “Illusion” and “The Illusionist”.   The right hand of the Illusionist wants you to believe what the right hand is presenting, so you don’t see what the left hand is doing.

Is there any question at all, on this blog, just who the ILLUSIONIST is?


  1. Bonnie did you watch the movie The Illusionist yet? I know I posted this before for everyone to watch it but I did not go back and see if anyone responded or if you posted it..... The ending is phenomenal!

  2. @Anonymous - No, I couldn't find it in the stores here. Where did you get yours?

  3. I found the Illusionist on Netflix Bonnie. You might find you can get a free one month trial for Netflix and watch it there.

  4. Hi Bonnie. I can't get over the gurney and autopsy photos. How many pixels was it in Fleaks camera? 0,00000000001 pixels or what? It's unbelievable! And when she was done I guess she handed over her camera from 1945 to our beloved Dr.Rogers. We talked about MJ's bodyparts looking strange. Him not having no navel and stuff. But nobody mentioned his nose. Who's nose is that? Does our nose turn into a different shape when we die or what? That is not MJ's nose, trust me. I've been going back watching some of the trial on YouTube. The second time you pick up things you missed the first time you watched it. It is interesting to study body language and stuff too. It's funny too at times. First Dr. Rogers comes on and speak extremely slow. And the judge says, would you please speak up. He should have said, would you speak a tiny bit faster please. Then his opposite character Dr. Shafer comes on and start speaking exctremely fast. You said what? The judge ask him to speak slower. Dr.Shafer does what he is told for like 10 seconds and then he is back to turbo speed. I love Dr.Rogers and Dr.Shafer they are charming, intelligent and polite and Dr.Shafer seem to have a sense of humour even though he had just lost his father. And the, "If Looks Could Kill", scene. What about that? Dramatic! And the cameras was there to catch that scene between Murray and Lee in close up. Good job you camera guys, it's a wrap, he he. Now back to the future. The Murray sentence. Susanne

  5. Bonnie,

    Thank You for posting the speech LaToya gave.

    Where was this speech given?

    Also, Conrad Murray's Sentencing is suppose to

    be today, Tuesday November 29th around 11:30 am EST.

    I will be glued to my TV set, for sure!

  6. Bonnie,
    Well, the ones who 'came back into Michael's life' after the TII contract was sgned were: Frank DiLeo, John Branca, Karen Faye.
    Before that, there were other managers,lawyers,make-up artists on the payroll.
    So, if I have got the list right :-)WHO brought them back. Was it Michael or was he forced to get them back by someone putting pressure on him? And who was THAT?

  7. Cathy said - "I found the Illusionist on Netflix Bonnie. "

    .......... Thank you Cathy. My husband is getting increasingly leery of ordering anything online/free trials and such. Once they have your info, they have it he says. Grrrrr! I'll have to call around. I wonder if any of the vid stores will have it for sale.

    Susanne said - "I can't get over the gurney and autopsy photos. How many pixels was it in Fleaks camera? 0,00000000001 pixels or what? It's unbelievable! And when she was done I guess she handed over her camera from 1945 to our beloved Dr.Rogers."

    ......... LOL! Yes, you have a good point. There was a photo that Latoya posted on Twitter of herself with Catherine Bach over Thanksgiving and as many other pics that she had posted online in various places, with other people I couldn't understand why the photo with Bach was so underexposed to the point you can't even really see Bach's expressions clearly. I'm not even sure it was her.

    It's always a good idea to go back and re-watch. it's like getting up from a letter you wrote and coming back to re-read only to realize you wanted to word it another way. I will be watching today.

    @Josie - I think this speech was given at a Tribute put on in L.A. on Nov. 20th. At first I thought it was at THE TRIBUTE in Cardiff Wales, but I don't think that is the case. This looks more like a more intimate nightclub setting.

  8. Princessglam said - "Well, the ones who 'came back into Michael's life' after the TII contract was sgned were: Frank DiLeo, John Branca, Karen Faye.
    Before that, there were other managers,lawyers,make-up artists on the payroll.
    So, if I have got the list right :-)WHO brought them back. Was it Michael or was he forced to get them back by someone putting pressure on him? And who was THAT?"

    ......... Well, I don't know, because if you REMEMBER correctly, wasn't it Karen Faye who was whining and moaning about AEG hiring Zaldy and another makeup artist CLAIMING Michael wanted THEM and not AEG's choice?

    Remember . . . SONY is the one that HAD TO GET INVOLVED with this thing because THEY HAD CONTROL OF MICHAEL'S MUSIC . . . No music no concert. Make sense?

    Now once this CONTRACT between Sony and Michael or Sony and AEG to ENABLE Michael to perform HIS OWN SONGS was established (which NO ONE HAS YET BEEN MADE PRIVY TO) THOSE PEOPLE brought in FOR SONY'S INTERESTS to be represented at this CONCERT would have brought in (of course) the likes of BRANCA, who's ALWAYS BEEN ON SONY'S PAYROLL, and other Sony-affiliated roaches.

    Michael did NOT WANT SONY BACK IN HIS LIFE. I would THINK that the SPEECH in LONDON back in 2001 would have made that ABUNDANTLY CLEAR to most.

    Again for the hard of reading . . . NO MUSIC NO CONCERT.

    Sony pulled the strings. Sony was the LEFT HAND that BROUGHT THOSE PEOPLE SURROUNDING MICHAEL back into his life.

    Now with that said, Do you believe for ONE MINUTE that Michael did not KNOW THIS WAS GOING TO HAPPEN if he put on a concert? He's not stupid.

    Michael KNEW! He KNEW Sony still had control of his music until July of 2009.

    How was AEG going to put on a concert with Michael Jackson when SONY HELD THE LICENSING??? Michael knew this . . .


  9. @Princessglam -

    I'll tell you something else that many people have forgotten about the significance of . . .

    Who's idea was it to move the concert dates back in July? Why was this REALLY done? Did someone force that "left hand" to act?

    Remember, remember the 5th of November, the Gunpowder Treason plot . . .

    I know of no reason, the Gunpowder Treason should ever be forgot . . .

  10. @BONNIE - Thank you vm for studying for us La Toya speech above. I always believed what she said about the fall guy & the gang behind him. But unless any infiltrated security or house employee mandated to kill was "hidden behind the door", can we imagine Phillips, Branca, Dileo or any big wheel of the showbiz do the job personally?! Or ?.. And if Murray was innocent from injecting a lethal Propofol dose to Michael, he could drop back into Michael's room any moment the killer operated on Michael. But as Jermaine once said in 2010, Murray did not "spit it out completely" yet so he might rather have played an active part. Whatever, another clue from La Toya without tangible proof leaving me with more frustration & doubts. If Michael was really murdered, either LAPD & Justice should know it & work silently on a survey OR huge bribes were paid to them to cover up high-level criminals in the showbiz or even the L.A. Authorities. If instead, Michael faked his death & escaped, God Bless : I wouldn't worry that much then. But Michael is a too precious human being to be indefinitely played with : too much harm was already done to him. Last, I do not trust ANYONE who was in Michael's entourage even lately, from Branca, Sony, AEG, staff, doctors, ANYONE..except his children & family !

  11. @Line - Well all we can do is wait and see. I can't forget what I researched last year and I did my research on both Phillips and Gongaware and I look at the timing of these people in Michael's life during certain events.

    No trust here either for anyone but God. I still believe Sony is the left hand, not AEG.

  12. Posted from Natural News, Please read:

    Dear NaturalNews readers,
    Things are getting gnarly in the Eurozone debt realm these days, and now national leaders and mainstream media writers are openly warning about a "debt apocalypse" that's fast approaching.
    I've been warning NaturalNews readers about this since at least 2008, and since then the European debt situation has gotten far worse. There will be economic spillover into the United States and other nations as well, thanks to the fact that so many nations are intertwined with highly leveraged debt.
    The artice I've written on this is not recommended for everyone. If you're new to being "awake" and operating in the real world, don't read this article because it touches on some rather horrifying truths about history repeating itself in some rather disturbing ways:
    Solutions: What can you do about the global debt crisis and its impact on your own personal finances? Stay tuned to NaturalNews as we will continue to provide front-line analysis and news coverage as this financial implosion unfolds. Above all,diversify! Don't put all your savings in one bank, or one currency, or even one type of asset. The real assets that will outlast the coming financial storm include gold, silver and farmland...

    On the good news side of things today, here are some useful ways to help prevent diabetes:

    Global health organizations are now mounting a huge push for aggressively pushingHPV vaccines into third-world countries:

    And did you know that wi-fi, cordless phones and EM radiation may promote cancer?

    Finally, here are some wonderful health benefits of cinnamon, a popular addition to holiday spice recipes:

    P.S. If you really want to learn more about the looming Eurozone financial implosion, here is a must-listen interview with Max Keiser and Alex Jones:

  13. Submitted via email by Karen:

    MONDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2011
    You thought the Patriot Act was bad?
    Remember when you thought the Patriot Act was bad. And when you learned that an FBI agent could write his own warrant and show up at your door - and you couldn't tell anyone, not even your own attorney, about that warrant?

    Get a load of this?

    From comes:

    "Since Occupy Wall Street began, American police officers have arrested thousands of people for exercising their constitutionally protected right to protest. On Monday or Tuesday, the US Senate will vote on a bill that would give the President the ability to order the military to arrest and imprison American citizens anywhere in the world for an indefinite period of time.

    "A provision of S. 1867, or the National Defense Authorization Act bill, written by Senators John McCain and Carl Levin, declares American soil a battlefield and allows the President and all future Chief Executives to order the military to arrest and detain American citizens, innocent or not, without charge or trial. In other words, if this bill passes and the President signs it, OWS protesters or any American could end up arrested and indefinitely locked up by the military without the guaranteed right to due process or a speedy trial."

    It's time to get on your phone and call your U.S. Senators. It's too late for e-mail, letters, faxes. Call !!!

    Remember what happened in the 1930s in Germany. The people slept through small, nibbling changes. When the big bites came, it was too late.

  14. @BONNIE : Michael was loved worldwide but the Russian personalities interviewed about him seem to have caught the essence of Michael's soul much better than in Western Europe or the USA, infected by the media nuisance for so long. Africa, Middle-East & Asia also honored Michael, an adorable big kid always nicely available to everyone & apart of Princess Diana, the best Ambassador for the children & the world. An Angel, as said the young Russian man. I enjoyed the Videos. Many thanks. (The Cascio family was lucky to make beautiful travels with Michael).

    In completion of your interesting Natural News, bad news too below :o(

  15. Bonnie,
    From what I hear, the U.S. also is heading for a debt crisis. They are having to cut back on military, to the point that it will become a 'paper tiger'.
    Hmm I have some gold and silver but no farmland LOL!

  16. BONNIE said : "I still believe Sony is the left hand, not AEG"

    Your above analysis on Sony to Princess makes full sense indeed, but MY problem is : in addition to Sony/Branca, I continue see bad guys everywhere. Hope we'll get fixed once.

  17. Something is cooking :

  18. Good eyes, Line Thank you.

    According to media outlets, a group of Russian warships led by a heavy aircraft carrying cruiser of the Northern Fleet, "Admiral Kuznetsov", will be put in in the Syrian port. According to official Russian version "the main task of the Russian fleet will be guarding the coast of Syria and prevent a military conflict with the Western states".

    Late last week, crews of only gang aircraft carrying cruiser of the Russian Navy "Admiral Kuznetsov" and a large anti-submarine ship "Admiral Chabanenko" completed preparations for a campaign against NATO in Syria, following the exercise program at the sites of combat training in the Barents Sea.

    In the campaign against NATO gang ships of Russian Northern Fleet will come already in early December. Aircraft carrier group will round the European continent to the west and will enter into the Mediterranean Sea via the Strait of Gibraltar. After passing through the Bosporus and the Dardanelles, the Black Sea patrol ship Ladnyy will join the ship. At the "Admiral Kuznetsov" will be eight naval Su-33 fighters, a few new MiG-29K and two anti-submarine helicopters Ka-27.

    The aircraft carrier will also have 12 launchers for anti-ship missiles "Granit", six-barreled anti-aircraft missile system "Dagger", eight anti-aircraft installations "Dirk", six six-barreled 30-mm gun mounts AK-630M, two rocket launchers RBU-12000 "Boa" .
    The heavy aircraft carrying cruiser project 1143.5 "Admiral Kuznetsov" is unique in the Russian Navy in its class. Designed to engage large surface targets, the protection of marine compounds from potential enemy attacks.

    Meanwhile, the situation around Syria escalates. America has deployed from the Persian Gulf to the shores of Syria newest multi-purpose attack nuclear-powered aircraft carrier George H.W. Bush, two guided missile cruisers and two missile destroyers.

  19. BTW - Murray got four years minus 46 days credit (23 for days served, 23 for good work credit). Judging by the way they calculate credits, Murray will probably serve 2 years of a four year sentence, but because of sentencing reallignment for non-violent crimes, Murray will not serve in State prison but in the L.A. County Jail.

    I will have the rest of this tonight.

  20. @Line you said - "in addition to Sony/Branca, I continue see bad guys everywhere."

    ........... Oh yes! Certainly not JUST with Sony/Branca . . . agreed!

  21. @BONNIE : The Murray sentence, did you see it ? I just saw the end 20mn ago :o( Now D. Walgren gives a speech is speaking with D. Brazil & D. Brazil.

  22. Line said - "The Murray sentence, did you see it ? I just saw the end 20mn ago :o( Now D. Walgren gives a speech is speaking with D. Brazil & D. Brazil"

    ............. Yes, I saw the whole thing and I will cover it tonight on the blog, along with a couple other things I had waiting until this moment. Wait until you see. The colors are bright and visible!

  23. Line said - "Africa, Middle-East & Asia also honored Michael, an adorable big kid always nicely available to everyone & apart of Princess Diana, the best Ambassador for the children & the world. An Angel"

    .............. :o)))))))♥

  24. Michael Jackson pain and tears . . . and we have not a clue, when it's all gonna end, but we're getting a better idea.

    Sometimes I just want to be told what to do. There is a certain comfort in that.

  25. Princessglam said - "From what I hear, the U.S. also is heading for a debt crisis. They are having to cut back on military, to the point that it will become a 'paper tiger'.
    Hmm I have some gold and silver but no farmland LOL!"

    ......... We can't be a paper tiger just yet, because Israel still needs us to fight it's battles for it. Besides, Obama's whole plan to fix the employment numbers includes hiring people, including civil military to police the citizens of THIS country. I'm sure the Zionist Congress will fork over some extra dough for that since it's in their plan anyway. (shrugs)

  26. Sent via email from Karen:

    Bonnie I found an interesting article about FOX the supposed cable '”news” channel...
    This is also a very good website...some other very good information.

  27. Next . . . (public service announcements) is aimed at the folks using the internet. I'm sorry to say that this is going to make some frequent posers and internet faux personalities a bit unhappy, if they think they can enforce such a thing:

    MEDIA ALERT: Downsize DC's Jim Babka will guest host a radio talk show tomorrow (Wednesday). Details are in the P.S.

    Have you ever checked a "Terms of Service" agreement without reading it? Have you ever been less-than-truthful in an email or social network?

    Then you may be a criminal. At least, that's what the Justice Department claims, and they want to strengthen the law to ensure that they have the power to prosecute you.

    That's why I sent a letter to my Representative and Senators to resist this power-grab and protect our freedom to use the Internet.

    I hope you do the same, and you may borrow from or copy this letter...

    I am disturbed that the Obama Administration wants to strengthen the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) to prosecute violators of "Terms of Service" (ToS) agreements on the Internet.

    The CFAA was intended to outlaw hacking and identity theft. But its vague language has led three federal courts to rule that employees can be prosecuted merely for violating their employer's "acceptable use" policy. The feds also prosecuted a woman under the CFAA for violating MySpace's Terms of Service. (

    The Administration wants to go further, and make ToS violations explicitly illegal under federal law. There are at least five reasons to oppose this...

    1. It criminalizes activities that would not be criminal in the physical world. You can assume a false identity at a party without breaking a law, but using a pseudonym on the Internet could be a felony.

    2. The innocent will be unjustly punished. If someone is falsely accused of a real crime like hacking, prosecutors will also charge him or her with ToS violations in order to secure a conviction.

    3. Since almost everyone is guilty of ToS violations, the law could be used by U.S. Attorneys to wage personal or political vendettas.

    4. It threatens the First Amendment because it could be deployed to prosecute individuals who criticize the Administration or Congress in comments sections or forums.

    5. A ToS is a PRIVATE agreement, and Internet hosts are free to ban violators. Trolls are often banned on websites. Fake profiles on social networks are often deleted. Employees who violate agreements and use their work computer for fantasy football can be fired.

    The Justice Department claims it wouldn't have the time or resources to go after trivial ToS violations, such as lying about one's age on a dating site. And yet it calls "worrisome" an amendment by Sens. Franken, Grassley, and Lee that would protect most people from ToS prosecutions. (

    Criminalizing ToS violations won't prevent serious computer crimes, but it WILL give the feds tremendous powers to abuse and harass harmless Internet users. Please support the Franken-Grassley-Lee amendment and provide other safeguards to protect the American people from an out-of-control Justice Department.


    You can send your letter using's Educate the Powerful System.

  28. Liberian Girl HeeheeNovember 29, 2011 at 7:48 PM

    Hey Bonnie,

    Here is the link to the Amazon website where you can purchase The Illusionist DVD. $8 and change and free shipping if you purchase a total of $25.

    The whole Aisha thing that you asked my opinion about seems a bit weird. I tried reading as much as I could get through on her site and all of the lawsuits that she has going. I never heard of her myself, so I am not really sure what to make of her.

    Looking forward to your post on the Murray conviction. Not sure what to make of that either right now. Was at work all day so I didn't get to see any of the trial yet or the statement made by the Jackson attorney.

  29. Hi Bonnie.
    Please have a listen to this and tell me what you think?

    It is the song 'This is it' backmastered.

    Love Jenny

  30. As for how Murray will serve out his sentence, I predict a custom bracelet for his ankle to coordinate with his blue ties and decor of his home! He got the four years, then credit for 46 days, no state prison in favor of county jail. Do you think they finally cleaned the feces from the bathroom they stuck poor Michael in? I don't think it's over yet. Murray should brace himself for house arrest!

  31. Bonnie said "Remember . . . SONY is the one that HAD TO GET INVOLVED with this thing because THEY HAD CONTROL OF MICHAEL'S MUSIC . . . No music no concert. Make sense?"

    From my understanding, this is only partly correct. Licensing is very confusing, so I may not get this 100% right but here goes.
    If you perform a song live with live musicians etc, in a public place, the royalty goes to the music catalog owner, in this case mainly Michael himself. So I doubt he payed himself a royalty, in effect then it is free for the majority of songs.
    If you play a track from an album in a public place, then you pay a royalty to the owner of the recording, in this case Sony (I believe some of the royalty is split between the catalog owner, singer, musicians etc.).
    So for TII Sony would get a cut if they played tracks from the album in the shows.You see how an artist can maximise their royalties by taking multiple roles in the the production of the music, so they get a cut when someone sings their songs and plays them on the radio.
    The other point which I'm more foggy over is whether the venue is licensed to play music, and if this would cover the royalties to Sony. So what I'm suggesting is that if the O2 is licensed to brodcast music, they have already paid the royalties in their license fee.

  32. Liberian girl said - "The whole Aisha thing that you asked my opinion about seems a bit weird. I tried reading as much as I could get through on her site and all of the lawsuits that she has going. I never heard of her myself,"

    .......... I never heard of her either before digging into all this. Time to revisit her I think. Madonna was an issue with Michael too, saying she was jealous of him (seems to be the carbon copy calling card for fellow Kaballists. Do they teach this stuff in Jewish Mysticism?) The religion of SELF. FISH.

    Thank you for the link but after today, I think I'm pretty much done with the thought of running around - I don't have the money to keep paying for clues nor do I want anyone else to feel they have to.

  33. @Jenny - That link with the backmasking of "This is It" was probably the first time I laughed today (and it's actually the next day, it's 4:17am and I have not been to bed yet). Sounds like Michael is whining, LOL! It's cute.

    Spotlight said - "I don't think it's over yet. Murray should brace himself for house arrest!"

    ........... No, not if he expects to stay alive. As far as the conditions of the bathrooms there, I have been lucky not to have been in a prison bathroom, so their cleaning habits are foreign to me. But if they haven't cleaned it I think Branca belongs in there more than Murray.

  34. Princess said - ""

    Every time you use such music for any other than your personal use . That is the law !

    The user is liable to obtain the license first, before performing or recording such copyright protected music.

    You do not need such a license for your personal use, that is, if you make one recording of your playing for yourself, or play music for yourself at home

    This is different again, when you intend to give away or sell your recording, or if your performance has an audience ! You will be surprised, that a few people constitute an audience, even in your own home! Most likely nobody will come after you, but at the moment, when it is classifiable as a public performance, you must obtain a license first! (copyright law) If you perform as a musician under a contract, the event organizer must obtain this license, check your contract carefully that this is not "downloaded" to you!. Most entertainment premisses have a 'blanket'-license, so you are covered, however, you might be required to make a list of the music you performed, so make and keep a record of it for yourself - always.In one case we know of such a list was demanded by court nearly a year after the event - could you recall every song you played at this event, even if you had only few gigs since then ?

    You also need a (different ) license, if you record copyright protected music. The moment you give only one copy to someone else, you are distributing or duplicating the music and it is no longer your personal use, you must get a license to do so first. You also record protected music without a license if you "only" download "free" music files! Many computer music users are not aware that their recordings and exchanges are violations of copyrights. Read the article on Computer music files and copyright and to say it again this applies to all computer sound file formats !)

    Also in reference to licensed venues - The O2 for example doesn't just "broadcast" music. One royalty fee covers hundreds of artists/labels? When I performed (and NONE of it was my own creation), I paid or the venue paid and I wasn't even getting paid! Church, we couldn't even play a movie without a license even though we were not charging for it.

    Then there is the marketing of merchandise which you know darned well Sony was going to get involved in. Are you telling me AEG could have put Michael on that stage and Sony could have been cut out, even with Sony owning the rights to Michael's songs until July 2009?

    Sony's relationship with Michael was a little more complicated than that . . .

  35. Bonnie said:
    "The Clinton’s don’t have many friends who aren’t pushing up daisies."

    Some of those people probably thought at one time that they had it made, cavorting with the Clintons. But, they involved themselves with the problem. It goes to show how expendable people are to the tyrannical if you get in their way.

    "List of the Dead":
    Wow! I had heard that people died around Clinton but I had no idea!
    They sure liked shotgun suicides, an almost impossible maneuver. And they got away with ruling shotgun blast to the back of the head...a SUICIDE?!? I doubt even a professional contortionist could manage that one.

    Karen said:
    "Remember what happened in the 1930s in Germany. The people slept through small, nibbling changes. When the big bites came, it was too late."

    History is certainly repeating. What's really difficult for me to grasp is children of holocaust survivors don't even recognize what's going on around them. Just as those famous words claim, people are more likely to believe a large lie than a small one...

    "All this was inspired by the principle--which is quite true in itself--that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the
    broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper
    strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and
    thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall
    victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often
    tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to
    large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to
    fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others
    could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously."

    "The TSA Exposed for Exposing Us – Again" - good article, lots of linked news stories of their personal abuses in searching people - children, the elderly and disabled.

  36. Bonnie-
    You are an amazing woman, and are doing such a wonderful thing with this blog! I have so much more to say to you but am having trouble posting here from my I wanted to say this to you now at least....and it is probably non-information, but I found it interesting...

    Regarding the lack of a belly button on Michael.....did you ever notice in his ...I believe...Childhood video...when he is in the water wearing the wings...the water comes up to....just barely.... his private area, and it appears he has no belly button in that video as well. I rwmember noticing that the first time I saw it. :

    Again....Great blog and i hope to post again soon

    - VampKira

    (ooohhh...they are doing Michael on X factor right now! :)

  37. Bonnie said "Are you telling me AEG could have put Michael on that stage and Sony could have been cut out, even with Sony owning the rights to Michael's songs until July 2009?"

    Perhaps that is what angered Sony? Perhaps Michael was walking away from Sony, taking his song rights and music catalog, and their goose-that-laid-the-golden-egg was slipping through their fingers? Perhaps they had the 'job' of controlling him, had failed to bankrupt him, and now he was about to relaunch his career and there was nothing legally they could do to stop him?

  38. Bonnie,

    Iwas just thinking about all the horrid things that the evil peoplein sweet Michael's life put him through, and when the particular thought below popped ito my brain, I felt compelled to post this here, and planned to do so later when I had more time, but Bonnie, I couldn't because it was really feeling odd, like something was making me think, " it NOW" and it makrs no sense because it isn't even close to critical or earth shattering, so I don't get it, but I have things to do, so I guess it must be now. :) :) very odd though........

    I thought about how he was made to lie at times, and I thought..."and we have PROOF!" Did you ever see the video of an interview with Michael where he was asked about touring, and Michael said"I hate to tour, I hate it" and they stopped the tape and told MJ not to say that, but to lie, and MJ said "Bu I DO hate to tour, it KILLS me to tour, I mean it KILLS me...I do'nt like it" and they did another take and he was asked aain, and this time he said " I love to tour" and kinda smiled and looked to the siade and everyone chuckled ait it and M ichael looked like ..exasperated.but look on Michaels face when he said it killed him to tour, ripped my heart out and no one seemed to notice or care....they just wanted to make sure Michael said what they wanted him to, for THEIR agenda, and Michael just wanted to be honest....AS ALLWAYS.

    That was it Bonnie...i hope i made sense, lol, i am a bit frazzled here and a bit curious as to why this seemed urgent. :)

    Thank you for all you very much.- Kira

  39. I believe when LaToya refers to the right hand she is talking about Dr. Murray. They keep showing us the right hand, but ignoring the left hand. Randy Phillips sat in court and said on the morning of Michael's death, he was called by other AEG people to get to Michael's house right away. Dr. Murray had called the AEG people and told them Michael was having trouble breathing. He was the closest to Michael's home, about 10 minutes away. HE SAID THIS OCCURRED AT 10:30 IN THE MORNING. THIS IS IN STARK CONTRAST TO WHAT MURRAY SAID HAPPENED. THIS MAN WAS CONTRADICTING THE STORY THE DEFENSE AND MURRAY WERE PRESENTING
    TO THE JURY. What did Waldron do? He IGNORED the contradiction. He didn't pursue this admission on the part of Randy Phillips. Why did Randy Phillips say this? Did he want to prove to us the power they have over the District Attorney, the police and hence all of us? Waldron did say in his robot like interview that he truly believed Michael was dead long before the time Murray claimed he was still alive.i noticed that Janet interrupted her tour in Austrailia to make a special trip to court when Randy Phillips testified. That was very telling.

  40. I am so thankful I found this site. It is a GOD send.

  41. VampKira said - "Regarding the lack of a belly button on Michael....."

    .......... I have the stills from that and you can see his bellybutton but everything is filtered for the "soft" look. Lots of airbrushing. Ilove that video. It's beautiful.

    Thank you very much Kira. I don't think I'm very amazing. I think what God is showing me through Michael's experience is amazing. What a way to build

  42. VampKira said - "but look on Michaels face when he said it killed him to tour, ripped my heart out and no one seemed to notice or care....they just wanted to make sure Michael said what they wanted him to, for THEIR agenda, and Michael just wanted to be honest....AS ALLWAYS"

    .......... I'm sorry it took so long to get back to you. It's harder to get back to the older blogs.

    Michael did say "I go through hell on tour". I think we are a LOT closer to seeing just how much and what kind of hell that was. Not the fans, not the sweat. The treatment by those who were supposed to care for and about him.

    Randy Phillips - I'm not sold on this because the prosecution witnesses lied and contradicted each other. Randy could very well have gotten a phone call from DiLeo. This was debated back when they all gave interviews in 2009. We will have to wait and see who is telling the truth. We have an appeal coming and the civil suit.

    Anonymous - Thank you, I am thankful you are here. God bless you♥


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.