Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Michael Jackson Becoming a "Tool of the Trade"

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Michael Jackson Becoming a "Tool of the Trade"

Michael Jackson
The First to Sing a New Song…

   

Breaks are sometimes good, even if only for two or three days, but boy!  I seem to go through these mini-anxiety accelerations if I am “away” from this purpose that this blog has become.  But it gives me time to sort in my brain the glut of information at my disposal with the distraction of further information to sort facing me on this computer. 

I think my mental “RAM” needs an upgrade.  Either that or I just needed to shut it down for a few days to cool the inners and do a hard reboot when I got back.

My husband and I decided to drive down to see my dad, whom I’ve talked about on this blog before and whom I haven’t seen since 2007.  I wanted to talk to him about the dream I had about him, trying to “wake” him up as I ran up ramps trying to get him to help me up – but it was him that needed the help waking up.

My dad lives a state away, just over the border inside Florida by about a half an hour in St. Augustine.  Of course I never watch T.V. so I had no idea that a tropical storm was off the indent of the east coast there.  But we drove out to the beach anyway the next morning.

One of my favorite things to do when I lived in Delaware was to drive out the beach when a tropical storm or hurricane was coming in (stupid, I know).  The wind, the sand hitting the back of your legs and the wild surf is my cleansing of all the junk in my mind.  In a world where men displace truth and want us to forget, it is a reminder for me of who is really boss as my senses take in the small example of the power of Him.  I had never done this in Florida, where water temperatures and the jet stream are more beneficial to storm development most of the time.

So on Sunday, after a very tough sleep after a five hour drive, my dad drove us both down to the beach.  Parking was not too difficult on that holiday weekend since the beaches were essentially closed due to rough surf.  But that didn’t stop the news people, the tidal pool waders and the one para-surfer we saw as we got out of the car.

My husband had no interest in going into the water, so I walked down the steps over the dune myself, with my shoes in my hand.  The water was up to the steps and when I stepped down, and was up to the top of my legs.  There was no current there because a sand bar separated that tidal pool from the real ocean.  I walked out to the sandbar which was only up to my ankles.  My husband took video on his phone.  I waved.  I felt like a little kid.  Sometimes ocean water is just healing.

I walked out to the waves coming in to that sand bar but did not venture out far.  The pull was killer.  Even on the sand bar, the pull from the ocean side waves took the sand right out from under my feet.  In the distance I could see the waves white-capping into the piles of the pier just under the walkway, which was about twenty feet or more from the water when the waves receded.

We drove to another beach further south, Flagler I think.  It was there that my dad came up behind me and scared me with a loud “whoooo-hoo!” in my ear.  (he will be seventy in the same birth month as Michael).  My dad is another one who is a kid at heart, never growing up which when I was – I’d wished he did.

My husband likes my dad.  He says he’s a good guy.  My dad has always been on the soft side personality wise and rather mellow for the times I did know him.  He preferred to confront with humor if he confronted at all.  I thought at one time he should have been tougher with mom and not let her take control, and maybe they would have stayed together.  That really makes me wonder what I’ve missed and what possible stories buried and left untold happened there.  But that doesn’t really matter now.  What matters is that I had a dream that God obviously wanted me to have, and that God wanted him too – another child within.



Revelation 4 and 5


After the chapters in Revelation in which John tells each of the seven churches what God is observing about their works, and they are given their warnings, the angel shows John what will be happening as Heaven prepares for the day of judgment.



After this I looked, and, behold, a door was opened in heaven: and the first voice which I heard was as it were of a trumpet talking with me; which said, Come up hither, and I will shew thee things which must be hereafter.  2). And immediately I was in the spirit: and, behold, a throne was set in heaven, and one sat on the throne.  3). And he that sat was to look upon like a jasper and a sardine stone: and there was a rainbow round about the throne, in sight like unto an emerald.


John describes being “in the spirit” as he is shown the things in Heaven.  I took note of the “One” who sat on the throne was like looking upon a jasper and sardine stone.  This is two of the same stones described in the book of Ezekiel as the beauty of him who was in the Garden of Eden and who was also in the King of Tyrus:


Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created."


God also created the angels – including the ones that disobeyed him.  Below in verses four through six is the description of the twenty-four elders, the seven lamps of fire which are the seven Spirits of God.  The seven candlesticks spoken of in Revelation 1:20 and the seven stars which are the seven churches and the angels of the seven churches.  Between chapters one and 4 in Revelation we have seven chandlesticks (the seven churches), seven stars (seven angels of those churches) and the seven lamps which are the seven spirits of God.  Are the seven angels the same as the seven Spirits of God or are they separate? (again evidence of a group of three: Father, Son, Holy Spirit – Spirit, Body Soul).


4). And round about the throne were four and twenty seats: and upon the seats I saw four and twenty elders sitting, clothed in white raiment; and they had on their heads crowns of gold.  5). And out of the throne proceeded lightnings and thunderings and voices: and there were seven lamps of fire burning before the throne, which are the seven Spirits of God.  6). And before the throne there was a sea of glass like unto crystal: and in the midst of the throne, and round about the throne, were four beasts full of eyes before and behind.”

7). And the first beast was like a lion, and the second beast like a calf, and the third beast had a face as a man, and the fourth beast was like a flying eagle.  8). And the four beasts had each of them six wings about him; and they were full of eyes within: and they rest not day and night, saying, Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, which was, and is, and is to come.  9). And when those beasts give glory and honour and thanks to him that sat on the throne, who liveth for ever and ever,


This is not the same beasts that are mentioned in Daniel 7, which were a lion with wings like an eagle, a bear, a leopard and a great beast with the seven heads and ten horns (this one is discussed later in Revelation).  If you read down to verse 24 in that chapter of Daniel, you can see where the “little horn” rises up and subdue’s three horns (nations) and the horn that rises up out of the ten.  Some speculate that this is the United States – others speculate that it is Israel (state of).

It is however the exact same vision that Ezekiel saw in the “creatures” that flew down to him with the four faces like four beasts:



"As for the likeness of their faces, they four had the face of a man, and the face of a lion, on the right side: and they four had the face of an ox on the left side; they four also had the face of an eagle."


What is this telling us?  The “craft” that they arrive in is described as “wheels” where the turning of the wheels shows different colors.  The “faces” described could have been possible insignias or logos on the vessels and the “eyes” could have been the windows of the craft – but these craft had the “likeness of a man”.  Back to Revelation 4 -


10). The four and twenty elders fall down before him that sat on the throne, and worship him that liveth for ever and ever, and cast their crowns before the throne, saying,   11). Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created."



Who was and is, and is to come




“And I saw in the right hand of him that sat on the throne a book written within and on the backside, sealed with seven seals.  2). And I saw a strong angel proclaiming with a loud voice, Who is worthy to open the book, and to loose the seals thereof?  3). And no man in heaven, nor in earth, neither under the earth, was able to open the book, neither to look thereon.

4). And I wept much, because no man was found worthy to open and to read the book, neither to look thereon.  5). And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof.  6). And I beheld, and, lo, in the midst of the throne and of the four beasts, and in the midst of the elders, stood a Lamb as it had been slain, having seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven Spirits of God sent forth into all the earth.


We know that the one worthy to open the seals is none other than “The Lamb” – Christ from the tribe of Judah, the “Root of David”.   The four beasts remember are the four described above with the same likeness of those in Ezekiel.  Also remember too that Ezekiel’s experience as a vision, the same as John’s in Revelation.

The “seven eyes” are the “seven Spirits of God” but what else does this say?  The “Lamb” as it had been slain has “seven horns”.  Back in Daniel and later in Revelation there is a beast with seven heads and ten horns that is THE BEAST.  So what are the seven horns on the Lamb?  Could that be the seven churches that have been sent forth unto all the earth?


7). And he came and took the book out of the right hand of him that sat upon the throne.  8). And when he had taken the book, the four beasts and four and twenty elders fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps, and golden vials full of odours, which are the prayers of saints.  9). And they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation;

10). And hast made us unto our God kings and priests: and we shall reign on the earth.


Verses nine through ten describe the “New Song” which later in Revelation 14:3 says only the chosen of the Tribes of Israel will know.   They are singing this to Christ who redeemed us to God out of every kindred, tongue, people and nation.  This is also in reference to the 144,000 of the called out of the Remnant of the children of Israel.  This is also those who the dragon seeks to make war against in Revelation 12.


11 And I beheld, and I heard the voice of many angels round about the throne and the beasts and the elders: and the number of them was ten thousand times ten thousand, and thousands of thousands;  12). Saying with a loud voice, Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive power, and riches, and wisdom, and strength, and honour, and glory, and blessing. 

13). And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, heard I saying, Blessing, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever.  14). And the four beasts said, Amen. And the four and twenty elders fell down and worshipped him that liveth for ever and ever."


All of creation.  But John soon learns what will happen for all this to come about in the coming chapters of Revelation.




What About Those Four Years, Eh?



There are some things that are beginning to open up and come together in the foretelling of things to happen in the Bible.  Sometimes I see metaphors and parables.  Sometimes I see the literal interpretation.

Michael’s songs had the same quality and unfortunately Michael battled the same enemies that the Bible battles.  The same disinformation and twisting of the truth has been his burden.

Take a look at how important all this is to the establishment that was behind what happened to Michael:


4 Years to Get it Right?
123 Shows
4.4 Million Fans
1 Complete Concert
July 16, 1988
London’s Wembly Stadium
BAD 25


25 Years to Make it “Bad”, July 16, 1988 + 25 Years = Makes 2013 – 1 Complete Concert? - (thanks to Diana).

Bad World Tour was the debut concert tour by American singer-songwriter Michael Jackson. Sponsored by Pepsi and spanning 16 months, the tour included 123 concerts to 4.4 million fans across 15 countries. When the tour concluded it grossed a total of over $125 million, adding two new entries in the Guinness World Records for the largest grossing tour in history and the tour with the largest attended audience.[1] In April 1989, the tour was nominated for "Tour of the Year 1988" at the inaugural International Rock Awards." –


The second leg of the tour touted the Wembley Stadium London Tour as the most successful in Europe, exceeding all other concert records for that venue at 1.5 million.  The July 16, 1988 date is the date that Prince Charles and Princess Diana attended –

"The most successful of the European dates were those in London at Wembley Stadium. Ticket demand for the five July dates exceeded 1.5 million, enough to fill the 72,000 capacity venue 20 times.  Jackson performed seven sold out shows, beating the previous record held by Madonna, Bruce Springsteen and Genesis. More shows could have been added, but the venue had reached its quota for live performances.  The third concert on July 16 was attended by Diana, Princess of Wales and Prince Charles." – Source, Wikipedia

They have planned for "BAD 25" right before the Olympics which is to start on July 27?  Is this just an album release and if so, why use the July 16th attended in London by Princess Diana as the promotional example?  Seven sold out shows. 

Just what are we supposed to be watching for?



The Remix Teaser


This is the comment I left and no, I did not bother with poetics.

Well, I can't speak for Michael, but neither can Sony because they killed him. So I will take the liberty of telling you from artist's standpoint that BAD did not NEED redone. I'm sorry to tell you this but this is a very heartless and pathetic attempt to resurrect perfection. You can't replace his soul with mixing equipment so please stop trying, or most of your efforts will fall along the lines of the fake "Michael" album, which sucked."



Positioning of the Beast



I am witnessing a rather sickening shift in the underbelly of the mechanism which will become the beast of this whole thing.  TL has been posting some rather interesting links.  While I work on those, I couldn’t help notice that the Michael Jackson “wolves in sheep’s clothing” are also doing their part to either distract, misrepresent the message or both.


Seven Bowie

I know some of you think her blog is a beautiful site.  So did I.  A long time ago (in the scheme of this mess).  Despite her loving bashing of this blog she did on Catherine Gross (other words in English: Disgusting, unsavory, distasteful, nauseating – I could go on . . .) blog talk radio show, she’s been rather unwilling to drop her political posturing on her personal (for a fake name) Facebook page.  To each their own.  That’s fine.  It’s her page.

However, the MJ community has been rather inundated of late on the “777” blog with promotional articles geared to sell the books of artists that again seem to have an inferiority issue with genuine photos.  I know Bowie is a photo shop/graphic artist amongst other things – And if she did this one, she’s not as good as she thinks she is.

The latest that was brought to my attention, is artist Nati Canada.

I was sent this picture:


Michael Jackson “Looking Glass”



And I was told “look at this picture.  There is something wrong with his eyes. Does that look like the Michael you’re used to seeing?” (paraphrasing).

Well, I looked at more than the picture, and truth be told, there is something wrong with the whole story.  So I did a little research.


Nati Canada


This is the article on Bowie’s site that was published back in November of last year.  But this is not the first publishing of this article.  It was lifted from a Spanish site who was the original publisher.

Seven Bowie Disinformation Artist

This is the original blog it appeared on - Original Translation

I ran this through the Google translator and it is the same exact wording as Seven Bowie and other forums have posted.


Take note of the painting or the images in the painting. These are previous poses of Michael in publicity photographs. 


This is the Painting Itself
Michael allegedly sat for in 1993


Inset on painting same as this
Just flip it on Photo editing software and draw!



Both blogs also show a photo of Canada and Michael together.  Michael is wearing the same outfit and same hair style as in the 2000 video below:


Same outfit


Michael wore this same exact outfit (minus the changed had which is easy enough to do on Photoshop – easy pasting job), the light blue “armband” is hiding behind the painting in the pose with Nati.  Michael has the same sunglasses, the same hollows showing in his cheeks and the very same strands of hair as in the Stan Lee video.  A clearer video is seen below:


Never before seen video series of Michael Jackson visiting Hillary Clinton whistle blower Peter F Paul and Spider Man creator Stan Lee's studio in Spring, 2000, to discuss buying Marvel Entertainment together. Here Michael Jackson describes pop icon Stan Lee's fame.www.hillcap.org" – source, http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6150762698748441866


Nati said she delivered this painting to Michael in 1996 three years after he originally sat for her.  She says the photos she took will forever remain a secret (except for the photo shopped one she shows?  I guess “confidentiality” has its limits when you’re trying to sell a book about a sitting that never happened).

We see the same shirt, same pants, same glasses, same hair style in 1996 as the photos with Stan Lee studio visit that happened in 2000???  In 1996 Michael still had shortish hair, especially in the early part of the year when he was still  married to Lisa Marie.


This is Michael Pictured with Nati – According to Nati
In March of 1996 when she says she Delivered
The Painting


This is Michael on March 1 of 1996


This is Michael on March 18 of 1996
With Prince Al Waleed



Other problems with her story are the fact that she recounts her meeting with Michael to deliver the painting with the claim that he met her with his son on his hip and she could hear his “other child” in the back ground.  Michael didn’t have his FIRST CHILD until February of 1997.  Must be some good incense she has burning in her crock pots.

Nati Canada is also writing a book – How convenient.  Seven Bowie’s Website thinly disguises the advertising of artists and propagandists that never met Michael.  Why?

Michael “married” Debbie Rowe in September 1996, was also on tour in Germany, Russia, Bucharest and supposedly Australia (where he and Rowe Married) all during September of 1996 according to old press.  Michael still had shorter hair (and getting longer) in September of 1996 when the famous picture of Michael and Debbie was taken.  In early 1996 when Nati said Michael “met” with her at a hotel, Michael was:

Going through the divorce with Lisa Marie in January  But according to Wikipedia this didn’t actually become finalized until August of 1996.

Married life for the couple was difficult; they had frequent disagreements. The union ended with divorce in August 1996, though Jackson and Presley remained friends.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_relationships_of_Michael_Jackson 

That same article says that Rowe suffered a miscarriage in 1996 in March (with Michael still married to Lisa Marie?) and that Rowe didn’t marry Michael until November of 1996 and she was very pregnant in that photo.  Michael still had shoulder-length, straighter hair. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_relationships_of_Michael_Jackson


In February of 1996, Michael was in Britain for the “Brit Awards” and dealing with that Jarvis Cocker: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkdikcrjbZk


This website claims Nati also painted Tony Curtis, Charleton Heston, Placido Domingo and the Spanish Royal Family . . .. I have found none of these paintings associated with her name . . . none.  Google turns up NO relation to those names matched with Nati at all.  She’s starting to look like DeGosson and her “photography” career.

I even went to the horses mouth . . . and there is NO information on her site, much like many of the phonies whom Seven and her other Marxist “New World Order” patsies like to create careers for -  http://www.naticanada.com/biografia.htm

Her website Whois claims her web site was registered in August of 2003.

[Querying whois.verisign-grs.com]
[whois.verisign-grs.com]Whois Server Version 2.0Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered
with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net
for detailed information.   Domain Name: NATICANADA.COM
   Registrar: ARSYS INTERNET, S.L. D/B/A NICLINE.COM
   Whois Server: whois.nicline.com
   Referral URL: http://www.nicline.com
   Name Server: DNS7.SERVIDORESDNS.NET
   Name Server: DNS8.SERVIDORESDNS.NET
   Status: ok
   Updated Date: 13-aug-2011
   Creation Date: 12-aug-2003

Expiration Date: 12-aug-2012NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring registrar.  Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration. – Source, http://www.betterwhois.com/bwhois.cgi?verification=8151&domain=naticanada.com&submitbtn=Continue

This is what her website (if the same one) looked like back in 2003, which is when the creation date of this site shows on Whois:


Link popularity report, shows a whole three links, all from the same blog.


Inbound links/reputation, only 6 since 2003???  A “painter” of Michael Jackson, Tony Curtis and Charleton Heston?  http://www.alexa.com/site/linksin/naticanada.com

Alexa traffic Rank . . . no data - http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/naticanada.com

Just for comparison, this blog, which has only been online since January of 2010 shows these numbers  http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/michaelsguardian.blogspot.com


I don’t know why Seven Bowie is promoting people with false stories.  With the thousands upon thousands of pictures of the inside of Neverland when Michael was still a resident, why does this painting never show up?  Not one picture of it prior to 2009.

What is the point of all this?

If she did paint Michael, good for her.  It’s not a bad painting.  The eyes in the main image are not Michael’s but it is still a good painting.  Why Lie?  Why try to convince people that she did these paintings in person?  (Oh yeah . . . to sell a book!  I forgot . . .)

One last little piece of information.  This “only” picture that she didn’t keep “secret” of her and Michael posing as she delivered the painting in “1996”, Nati seems to be exactly the same age as she does in THIS photo taken at a wine tasting at an art gallery in 2011:


Nati and a copy/paste of Michael in “1996”
Just My opinion but she looks OLDER here then below in 2011


Nati in 2011
There should be a sixteen year difference in Age - Where is it?



(shakes head)  “I don’t understand it . . . yeah yeah, don’t understand it, hey!”




Catherine M. Gross


Another propaganda artist, in her infinite wisdom, decides to borrow some New-Age mantra from Karen Faye  (Just what is she Reverend of?  One of those Insta-ordinations from the Libertarian Unified Church?)  I lifted this from a news item post that showed up on my wall on Facebook.  And it says . . .


Catherine M. Gross
Okay, I will tell you now, what Michael meant. He knew that after President Obama was gone, that would be the last chance for us to get the environment right. It has been a hard fought fight. It now appears that we are planning to live on the moon, as we have trashed the earth. Its lot too late...lets love each other, and lets love the planet."


Let me say it for you – “Huh???”

I’m still trying to figure it out.  Let’s take it sentence by sentence.  I assume that she was referring to Michael’s “four years to get it right” speech.  And after three years of listening to his music and salivating over his gold pants THIS is the best she could come up with?  Obama?   Who’s birth certificate was probably photoshopped from the same person who did Nati’s picture of Michael, yet he’s going to save the planet?

Sweetheart, which one?  The one Obama was actually born on or this one?  Because Obama has no power to do anything here!  The bankers have him anchored to the Military Industrial Complex.

She says that we are now planning to live on the moon. Who is we?  The TINI girls?  And how are you going to get there?  Home-grown weed and a really strong bowl of chili?

Most of us already love the planet – Just not what they continue to do to it.  And I’m almost positive that most of us can love one another if we are not continuously lied to about what love actually is.  (Shakes head again).

I’m learning that a blogtalk radio show of your own does not a legitimate message necessarily make.  But who am I?  I’m nobody.  I’m just somebody who writes a blog and allegedly “attacks” other people for LYING.  While there is no law against LYING specifically, I just really, really, really HATE IT when they use Michael to gag us with their New Age, demonic-oppression propaganda.

I don’t see any of these “love one another” doing one damned thing for any of Michael’s children that he loved so much, like HELPING EXPOSE this kind of garbage:


EXPLICIT CONTENT: This report contains graphic details of sexual abuse of children as it has appeared in numerous locations on Facebook. WND immediately reported images of child pornography and child sexual abuse to the FBI. Censored screenshots published are among the mildest of those found.)"” - Source, WND.com

If you don’t care about human life . . . every ONE that God made, chances are you really don’t give two craps about anything else on this planet either ‘cept yourself.  If your argument FOR killing babies boils down to “choice” and “it’s my body” really, what chance does the spotted owl or the whale ultimately have?  ‘Nuff said.




Shared in an email to a friend

There has been some controversial stuff brought up on the blog - DNA manipulation as it pertains to the rebuilding of the temple, and the symbolism on Michael's "BOTDF" album with the "destruction of the temple/chromosomes/DNA" and a new "hybrid/chromosomes/temple" brought up in its place.  Michael's picture with Debbie Rowe and that fact that children just seemed to "appear" at the same time a story about Debbie "offering" to carry children for Michael has left me foaming at the mouth angry.  Regardless of what they did (their schemes and their plans), It seems to me that Michael made the hearts of those children to be with God.  Trying not to think about other possibilities.

Yes, Barry is alone now, but NOT alone.  So I hope he knows that.  Unlike some of the others that have left us, Robin's departure was more than evidently health related.  The things they can do to people now, just dropping something in a drink that will spread cancer throughout the body in record time without the recipient ever knowing.  Scary stuff.

Yes, on Lisa Marie.  I could see some of her songs as being the "announcement" of her leaving Scientology.  All the smoke and mirrors religion distractions will now be "sacrificed" for the new "One World Religion" that will probably manifest itself either during or shortly after the 2012 Olympics disasters.  But unlike some theorists, I don't think the MAIN EVENT will be IN LONDON (really, why would so many celebrities move there if it was going to be destroyed?), but the possibility of a smaller, cover-fire false flag event will distract people from where the big disaster will take place and I assume it will be here in the States.

I am watching the posturing of the fake fan gangs - Seven Bowie and "Reverend" Catherine Gross and how heavy they are now hitting the agenda promotion.  Yes - Michael's "4-years to get it right" has everything to do with Obama saving the world.  Bunch of garbage, I can't believe people are swallowing this.  We have one more month to go.

"Michael Jackson loves Lisa Marie return together". 

I got spammed with that search term all last year.  I haven't seen it at all in the last four months.  Something is up.  All of this is really sick.

Not sure I believe the story about the child/milk carton either.  But they will expose the more horrible of what was being done as what I believe will be the last push of people over the cliff - something like, "This is what your governments have been up to, hidden and financed by you!  We have exposed it and now, with the help of "God" all of us can come together for healing, peace and "unity".  Now hold out your hand and accept your number!  It's all for L.O.V.E."

And I’ll close with the below:


Just Creepy


From Micheline via Email -

"Bilderberg’s high-power participants interact with, and are cross-represented on, the global private power web through membership and directorship in the Trilateral Commission, CFR, AEI, governments, corporations, banks, media and others.

Interestingly, also in attendance are founders and top executives of giant Internet management and intelligence gathering companies as Google, Facebook, LinkedIn and Microsoft.

Clearly, they run countries around the world, not voting citizens…"

This country of ours is cooked...


Propfol Executions?

The Missouri Department of Corrections has announced plans to remove the current 3-drug cocktail for lethal injections and instead use a massive dose of Propofol.

If approved Missouri will become the first state ever to approve Propofol for the legal execution of an inmate or anyone for that matter . . . Missouri currently has 19 condemned men sitting on death row, if approved they could all soon be given the Michael Jackson death penalty." - Source, The Inquisitor



It’s just one big joke isn’t it?  Anyone laughing?

Not Me!


14 comments:

  1. Anonymous,

    I hear you. Keep the faith okay? I am working on other things too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Right : The BAD Remix teaser is pure cacophony, nothing to do with Michael's original. The BAD Kids' version is the only one I found cute :o) ..in Michael's time however :

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DeCqVAOqsI

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I can live with that, I guess ):o) and for some reason, I'm looking at the word "cute" and the word itself resembles its meaning.

      Delete
  3. www.livescience.com/5537-michael-jackson-cloned.html

    Do you recall this article Bonnie?

    www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/michael-jackson/5766472/michael-jackson-obsessed-with-cloning-himself.html........or this (obviously the first comes from the second)? or worse still..THIS:www.clonaid.com/page.php?18. This cannot be REAL.Surely. There seems to be a few links like this. Was Michael hinting again??

    TL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I remember seeing them along with the glut of other "sensationalized" articles. An element of truth to them? Well, we know that stem cells have been a researched and political item for well over two decades now.

      Delete
  4. Hey Bonnie, I followed your links for Nati Canada's websites from 2003 and current. If you click on the links at the top of the page on the 2003 website you will come to a page with portraits. Here's the link http://web.archive.org/web/20040704174204/http://www.naticanada.com/frsetobra_ret.html Click on the numbers at the top of the page, you'll get different portraits. I recognized Charlton Heston, Placido Domingo, Tippi Hedren and the one above of Michael among other people I don't recognize. As for the current website, the link you posted for the non-existent biography. If you click on the links at the top of the page you'll open up lists of where her works have been and a list of the people she's painted. I'm posting the link to the list of her subjects. http://www.naticanada.com/algunos_retratos.htm Interestingly, the person above Michael's name in the list is Desiree Presley, daughter of singer Elvis Presley (translated to English). Huh??? I googled her name and supposedly she's the daughter produced from an affair between her mother, Lucy De Barbin, and Elvis Presley. Strange....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Debbie - Thanks for the links, but I was looking for proof of these works on some other website other than hers. I did images searches on Google and still turned up nothing. That pic doesn't look like Heston to me but that doesn't mean it isn't. The list of famous faces I have charcoaled and pasteled is longer, but I never claimed any of them sat for me or tried to write a book about the sitting. I did a portrait of Ronald Reagan in 1981 and sent it to him, but he STILL never sat for me.

      The photo above of Nati and Michael together is a photo shopped picture and she looks older in that pic (supposedly taken in 1996) then she does in the 2011 publicity shot, with a Michael that does not match his 1996 look. So why would she do that and try to sell a book about Michael when she never met him? What is the purpose of photo shopping a picture of him next to her? Doesn't she get paid enough in her profession? What's the agenda behind this?

      The Desiree Presley item was interesting. I did read some years back that Elvis had an illegitimate daugher but believed it was just another tabloid story. I didn't recall the name though.

      Delete
    2. Deborah, at the site I did post, I did take note of the "Spirits" theme of her web site and suspect that this book of hers may have an esoteric theme behind it as well. That is why I pointed that web site out.

      Delete
  5. I've been reading around the web this morning and came across a piece sent to a blogger - one important sentence ...."The New Age movement is a deliberate joining of occult organisations with political organisations by well connected individuals with power."

    I agree with the writers thoughts. It is as plain as day, beyond obvious and in fact, thrown in everyone's faces and yet nothing seems to be able to stop them. I guess that's the beauty of teeing up with those that run the world, you becocme unstoppable.
    The doctor whose links I left for you Bonnie (Dr Gregory) is affiliated with these people and that is why I am very concerned. We can see how he slots in right up at the top there (politically, educationally and so on)I wonder what it was Bill Clinton wanted with him in the past? Anyhow,almost everywhere you turn whilst searching out "Michael stuff" ,are names of those tied to the New Age movment.(Some of the poor suckers may not even know what sort of people they are supporting).

    TL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TL,

      http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2012/05/michael-jackson-and-brave-new-world.html

      New Blog . . . You're going to have to bear with me. There is a LOT of information buried. The funding sources are very, very interesting.

      Think Colony Capital and business filings of 2008, and Raymone Bain and Michael's business filings/reorganizations in 2006-2008. Carbon copy.

      Yes I agree with that blogger. Michael's "conspiracy" that he talks about.

      On Gregory, we will cover more about him, but I got a good start in the posting tonight. Others in there two . . . all of them tied to the Huxley's, Sangers, Marx, Freud and the pharmaco industries/Hitler's biological experiments.

      There is also connections to the international pedophile rings which . . . (breathe) I'm just cracking now.

      Delete
  6. Now, this Dr Greg and his line of work, brings to mind that video we all saw (filmed prior Michael 'leaving') of Prince with Tavis. He spoke of musicians own creations, the genome and God Talk. It was only a brief comment from him. Seeings he rarely gives interviews, this one seemed rather timely. Then Michael disappears on Princes 25th Anniversary of Purple Rain. I just wonder about all of this..........is it related to what Michael may be fighting against, or is it just a mere conincidence.

    TL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Prince with Travis or Tavis? (Tavistock?) I will have to look into that one. I don't remember it, but I do remember the interview about the "indentured servitude" and his opinion of Obama, which I thought was funny. (Hmmm - well I don't vote. I got no dog in this race...") Would love to talk to that man. He strikes me as intelligent but SNEAKY.

      Anyhow, what I find on that could very well fit into tomorrow's expansion on this topic. Lots of info . . . lots and LOTS of info and connected dots . . .

      Delete
    2. Yes, there is lots and lots and lots and lots of info tied and connected with all of this Bonnie. The reason I put that Doctor up is not just for his mission in life but the people he chooses to promote who, in my opinion, are terribly dangerous. They are all in on IT together.

      Can't get past Prince becoming a bit more public than usual around Michaels' 'leaving' and Kenny's comment to Oprah about Michael being worried that "God would give it to Prince" , then the death/anniversary date 25th june 2009, and the strange feel in that studio during Princes interview on the VIEW.....he said..I LOVE YOU, to the audience and someone yealled back I LOVE YOU MORE and it just 'did something'....did you ever see that? hmmm, could have just been the timing. I worry about his tie to Dick Gregory I have to admit. Anyhow, its the same video that you said he mentions not having a dog in that race.....that interview is with TAVIS SMILEY. Another favourite TAVIS SMILEY vid is the James Ingram one prior Michaels 'passing'......you MUST watch it if you haven't already seen it.... its about Michael and its lovely.

      TL

      Delete
    3. Prince's interview Tavis is the one I've featured before then, but I don't think I have the whole interview. I was with him until he started talking about the there being presidents of the U.S. before George Washington and the fact that he BECAME a Jehovah's Witness which is another Mason-started church here in the U.S.

      I do not think "God will give it to Prince". Prince won't need Michael's, because they are going to try to give it to another Michael. A created one.

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.