Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Who's Responsible for Michael's Daughter Paris?

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Monday, May 14, 2012

Who's Responsible for Michael's Daughter Paris?


Michael Only Wanted to Help Them
The Victims of the One World Cult


 Another happy picture of Michael and fatherhood?  Raise your hands if you think Michael's expression is that of an absolutely thrilled, happy father?  Anyone?


How about this one?



That's HIS CHILD whom he is covering with his hand, isn't it?   Where's that beaming, ecstatic look of pride?  I wonder how many shots with the tazer it took to get him to pose for this picture?  Because that is about the only comparison I can make for this expression on his face.

Supposedly Debbie Rowe cried in court in 2005 when she stated to the judge, "I just want to be his friend again . . ."

Why?  Helping Klein poison him with Demoral wasn't enough?  Making sure he had "Jewish" children wasn't enough?  Here's what I don't get Debbie . . . 






Really?  How in the world were you going to keep this up as the children matured and not one shred of African American IDENTITY is visible in these children?  I'm still reeling at the thought that you'd let ANY DNA of Arnold Klein's anywhere near you, but no accounting for taste!

His mouth is the same shape, Nose is the same, hair color is the same, eyes the same . . . he even has the same crooked little smile!

Photoshop all the vitiligo on him you want, this is KLEIN'S KID and that is the evident truth.

Does ANYONE honestly see ANY Michael in the two oldest children?

Blanket is the ONLY one that remotely looks like Michael and that is IN THE EYES   (She told my baby we danced til three - baby cried his eyes were like mine . . . . )  Prophecy or conspiracy?

Why does Michael look terrified Debbie?  Why?

Now we have Paris running around throwing devil horns and wearing "33" T-shirts while at the same time "twittering" about the Illuminati.  Since they are being "put out there" in provocative poses with purposely deceptive messages, it must be a sign they are not really Michael's.  Maybe they have some clips of her at Bohemian Grove?  Plans for the future?  Did I give it away?  Ooops!

What's the purpose of all this?  Just what CLUE are you trying to give away by putting the children out there to market evil?

Why is "Dealz" or whatever the hell his name is, shilling for Branca on his radio show, complaining about fans distrust of the estate with that malware of a human being, Majestic the Malignant?  Perhaps Dealz is happy with his "cut" of his uncle's blood money?  After all, he can sit back, DJ on his internet radio show, let them put his nieces and nephews to work to continue to fill the estate's coffers.  This will enable him to continue pontificating about how much he misses the man he's living off of while pretending to be significant to his fan base!  One I.V. stick for every dollar, eh Dealz?

Is that what you want to hear?  If not, why don't you USE some of that air time to tell fans the TRUTH instead of blathering about how much we DON'T KNOW?  It's been three freaking years!  This isn't CUTE anymore, okay?  And tell Paris to wash her face!  She's too young to look like Elvira.

I was in a GOOD MOOD until I saw that today, well SAW THAT and HEARD THAT on Dealz IRC.  Let's just forget about the fact that it was HIS OWN UNCLES that complained about the "estate executors" back in 2009 and 2010 which is the reason the FANS drew distrust about them in the first place. Where does Dealz think we GOT our information?  Unless his uncles on Twitter are fake too?  Maybe Dealz is fake?  Maybe the suffering his uncle Mike went through is fake?  At least if he believes that it will make it easier to accept his money from the estate executors!

This is what I was originally working on before I saw all this today.  I am so sick of crying over this crap and this is what it is . . . crap!  I'm beginning to think the Jacksons (or some of them) get some sick satisfaction  in wrapping the fan's emotions around their little fingers and then SPITTING on them!

I am sick of writing and researching this SHIT day after day and having people like DEALZ sit there and advocate for these demons!  These sick PERVERTS that TORTURED HIS UNCLE and covered up the rape and maiming of children!

Then to top that off, we're supposed to just let it slide that Paris is out there looking like one of the TINI stalker sluts from Mars that camped out in front of her dad's house every day like rodents getting ready to take each other out over a bread crumb.  Next it will be a tattoo and swastika jewelry!

Michael?  What ever happened to letting children be children?  Hard to prey on innocence when there isn't any left.  Is that the plan?

I'm getting back to the children now - the ones that DON'T have to depend on the Jacksons.  Understand I was in a much different mood when I wrote the below (some of it two days ago).



And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.  12. And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.  13. These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.

14. These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.  15. And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues.



Falling In Love Was Not My Plan
I’m the Light of the World Run Away


I love that song.  That song means a lot to me.  When I hear that song, I really feel it and I feel Michael.  I never expected to fall in love with him either, but I’m glad I did.  Because he made me really, really see Jesus’ words in the Bible about “being of one heart and one soul” for what they really mean.  In Christ.  Michael has been my guide to understanding who God is and how He works and what is in His Word.

Well, now that Michael is the “light of the world run away”, we know that Michael also said “I don’t wanna walk away”, because there are still children here that need help.  He asked us to help them, many, many times.


We Are God’s Children


I almost don’t want to listen to this song anymore because of the corruption of God’s word in it (God did NOT change stone to bread.  Jesus said NO to the devil) and this song no longer means what it used to.  They changed Michael’s song, just like they changed and manipulated everything else in History.  But I didn’t chose that video for the song.  I chose it because of the images of Michael with the children.

As I look through the images I realize that none of what you see there has to be.  Yes there are people using children for a lot more sinister reasons, but even the starving children and those with diseases are the victims of the very same evil.

When we covered the blog topics on DNA (Structure of the Temple, Michael and the Third Temple, and Michael Victim of Selfish Kind of Love) and the fact that we are the temple, we learned that the temple they seek to corrupt (and have) is the human body.  It is easy to see how and why our own bodies would be the targets of these fiends.

Most of the disease in the world is the result of what the Bible referred to as sorcery.  And from a previous blog topic (Taking back what is God’s) we know that the word Sorcery is derived from a Greek word meaning “Pharma”.  We know that “Pharma” actually comes from a word meaning “poison”.

1640s (pharmaceutic in the same sense is from 1540s), from L. pharmaceuticus "of drugs," from Gk. pharmakeutikos, from pharmakeus "preparer of drugs, poisoner," from pharmakon "medicine, poison." - Source etymonline.com


Now we know why Michael did not want pain killers after his burn accident in 1983.

Word history and origin:


“pharmaceutical
1640s (pharmaceutic in the same sense is from 1540s), from L. pharmaceuticus "of drugs," from Gk. pharmakeutikos, from pharmakeus "preparer of drugs, poisoner," from pharmakon "medicine, poison." - Source, Dictionary.com


Origin of the word “sorcery”:


sorcery
c.1300, from O.Fr. sorcerie, from sorcier "sorcerer," from V.L. *sortiarius, lit. "one who influences, fate, fortune," from L. sors (gen. sortis) "lot, fate, fortune" (see sort). Sorceress (late 14c.) is attested much earlier than sorcerer (1520s)." - Source, Dictionary.com

Emphasis is mine.  I noted “one who influences”.  On the same source, dictionary.com I found

Influence - in·flu·ence   [in-floo-uhns]  Show IPA noun, verb, in·flu·enced, in·flu·enc·ing. noun

1. the capacity or power of persons or things to be a compelling force on or produce effects on the actions, behavior, opinions, etc., of others: He used family influence to get the contract.

2. the action or process of producing effects on the actions, behavior, opinions, etc., of another or others: Her mother's influence made her stay.

3. a person or thing that exerts influence: He is an influence for the good.

4. Astrology .
a. the radiation of an ethereal fluid from the stars, regarded as affecting human actions and destinies.

Synonyms -
sway, rule. See authority. impress, bias, direct, control. incite, rouse, arouse, instigate, induce, persuade.


I would say this pretty much describes mind control.  So “mind control” or “to influence or control another human being” is “sorcery”.  But it doesn’t stop at the mind.  No, they wanted to influence down to the very cell of the human body.

This is done a number of ways, either through music, drama, colors, pharma (poisoning), scents or touch.  Understand that poisoning doesn’t always have to have a fatal effect.  It is essentially the corruption of natural body processes with the unnatural or  the corruption of God’s work, (God’s temple).  In other words, the corruption of natural signals processed from one cell to another.  Like the disruption of signals to pain receptors in the brain, or the inhibiting of the body’s natural propensity to produce fever to fight foreign matter.  (The corruption of the protein molecules that tell the cells what their jobs are?  Like Laminin?)


Cell Adhesion Molecule
Organized into a certain structure
That tells the cell what it’s job is
In the body @ 2:03


Certain intensities and textures introduced through the five human senses induce certain responses to influence human emotion.  The power of “thought”, who’s engine is “human emotion” which is seated in the “seat of the soul” or the “Pineal gland”.  Once you calcify that pineal gland or exert “influence” over human emotion, you control that human being. 

Michael drew a lot of pictures.  One of them that I remember is this one:


The Power of Thought


He also drew this one:


A mind shocked beyond recognition
YOU PAYING ATTENTION DEALZ?


He left these around to tell us something.  Getting through the very protein molecule in which God made us to “consist” and be made “by Him and for Him” – the very protein molecule that tells our cells what their jobs are.  But that’s not all they have done or are in the process of doing.

TL on a previous blog sent me to this video:


Blue Brain Project


She posted this with a warning about “Freeman.org”.  I will go into that later.  Below is another video, a rather too quickly moving PowerPoint presentation on what the Blue Brain project is.


A Powerpoint of Advantages/Disadvantages



This is something we can keep an eye on, but in my personal observations?  If this information is coming out NOW - They’ve had this technology for a while and have kept it hidden until they have had things in place. 

The powerpoint presentation, which shows nanobots or examples of them more or less explains the “mark of the Beast” and how it will work.  Again, this takes us back to control of the mind or control of the “soul”.  You can’t clone a person without being able to clone a soul.  (stealing of souls) – or Stealing from God.


What is Sorcery?

Sorcery has been practiced as far back as the first influence of the fallen angels, corrupting the human DNA through the taking of “daughters of men” as wives and bearing children through them.  The first “sorcery” or “influence” exerted over God’s creatures was in the Garden of Eden, where the “King of Tyrus” was accused of being in Jeremiah.


"Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus saith the Lord God; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty.  13. Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created."


Their “secrets” were given to their offspring to “influence” or exert influence over “common men”.  To enslave and oppress.  To become “gods”………

This has been a gradual process. One which incorporates the infiltration, then influencing of various institutions that guide the processes of society.   This includes the educational, medical/health, governmental, entertainment, information management and technology.

Aiming  their influence at the younger generations they can within a generation change a society.  Between the 1940’s and the late 1960’s, the operation and morality of an American family was changed forever.

Below is a posting of a report written up by a member of the Belgium parliament.  Read what she says about the changing of the acceptance of birth control and abortion:


"The fact that ordinary people no longer seem to be appalled by abortion-and their ready acceptance of the concept of the “unwanted child”-illustrates a terrible truth: the notion that there can be a discardable side effect of intercourse that is nothing more than a “problem” to the woman has become embedded in the collective subconscious of our society.

It is only a small step to the idea the sexual act is infinitely more valuable than the life of the child, or any respect for the child, or for life itself. This idea underlies the statements of a vociferous group in our society, including not only militant feminists but also “educators” who propagate such thinking among our children." - Source, http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1135141/posts  


This sounds very much like a cult or the mentality of someone involved in a cult.  That life is less important than the act of sex.  However, this “cult” is world wide.  It is taught in public schools, it is legislated and it is written into law and subsidized by tax dollars.

This was written by a member of Parliament in Belgium who had listened in and was researching a case involving the ritual murders of five girls.  I found her notes on the blog “Freerepublic.com”

She also wrote:

"It was Christianity that brought a fundamentally difference view of humanity. A human being no longer belonged to his master but to God. Our society is gradually becoming a post-Christian society in which there is a return to the pre-Christian vision of man. The process is underway but has not yet fully completed itself. Hence, we object not only to the murder of Julie, Melissa, An, Eefje and Loubna, but also to the way in which they were raped and abused as objects of for the satisfaction of sexual lust. But we do not object to using people as objects when they consent to it. And we do not object to aborting unborn human beings. If this process continues, the day may well come when we consider the crimes committed on the Belgian children as only infringements of their parents’ property rights!"

"The idea that children are property of the parents also underlies the “right to have children” which is used to justify in vitro fertilization and surrogate motherhood. As in the case of abortion, the argument is twisted. If it is true that unwanted childlessness is a terrible affliction, it is true precisely because of the “outdated” paradigm of the child as a unique human being-the old-fashioned belief that it is a child which makes a couple’s love tangible and gives meaning to their unique “two in one flesh” relationship. Whereas the now-available reproductive technology reduces the child to a commodity which can be ordered, bought, “farmed” as it were, to fulfill the demand of the customers and owners, its parents."


I have always believed this.  And ironically so did Michael Jackson.  How often did we read that Michael commented to his children that he loved ALL children and that they did not “belong” to him?  This is also a subject I will delve deeper into later.  I do not believe Michael had children through invitro, nor do I believe that he had intercourse with either woman, Lisa Marie or Debbie Rowe and I will leave it at that for now.  A picture is worth a thousand words and the photo of Debbie and Michael tells me Michael looked terrified.  More on that later.

I got this from Alex Constantine's Blacklist.  Another journalist-turned-investigative-blogger.  As a Preface to his article on the case in Louisiana, he wrote this (a truth as why these things never come to light).

The article contains this paragraph:


"I could only read about 15 pages at a time," said Wall, assistant district attorney of Louisiana's rural Tangipahoa Parish, north of New Orleans. "It just really wore on me. It just made me tired."

Of all the bizarre tales of ritualistic child abuse accompanied by sacrifices and group sex, Wall's case stands alone — his was proven in court. It is a story of sexual hedonism in a house of worship, some of it perpetrated by parents against their own children. . . Numerous cases have been proven in court. The press constantly downplays ritual abuse, covers it up with facile distortions.


This is why there is a very small percentage of actual court documents in evidence of Satanism or rituals in these abuse cases:


"Former pastor Louis Lamonica was sentenced last year to four concurrent life terms for having sex with his two sons. Another church member was sentenced to three life sentences for systematically abusing his daughter until she was 5. A third pleaded guilty to sexual battery of the same girl and received a 10-year sentence. A fourth awaits trial.

"I had McMartin (the California preschool scandal) thrown in my face a lot during all this," Wall said. "That's the main reason I kept this devil worshipping stuff to a small portion of the trial. Worshipping the devil is not illegal. Child molestation is. That's what I focused on." - Source, http://aconstantineblacklist.blogspot.com/2009/08/abuse-in-louisiana-ritualistic-child.html  


They used the McMartin case as an example of quashed details and what was really behind the case of the preschool child abuse scandal.  This was long before “Boys Town” came out, “DC Callboys” and the “Hershey Orphanage” and Sandusky’s “Second Mile Program” began tying things together with the Catholic church scandals and the Netherlands international child pedophile rings.


"In excruciating detail, the ex-leader of Hosanna Church in tiny Ponchatoula on the northwest bank of Lake Pontchartrain, wrote in a journal how he and others stood shoulder to shoulder in the youth hall, passing children to each other, committing every imaginable sex act upon them.

"Everybody got a turn," Lamonica said. "It was like nobody missed out, including the women."

The Hosanna faithful, once a thriving congregation, had dwindled to a dozen or so families over the past decade. They abandoned their First Assembly of God affiliation and whitewashed the windows of its sanctuary and school.

Behind the glass, members abused children from infants to toddlers and beyond, splattered animal blood and dabbled in devil worship, Lamonica and others set down in thick journals written in hopes of forgiveness. The books were later seized by sheriff's deputies."


More . . . Blackwater Security Firm used in Iraq, used child prostitutes at its compound in Iraq's "Green Zone".  This is on top of the other government contractors such as Dyncorp and Haliburton:


"According to a report by MSNBC and based on alleged sworn declarations by two Blackwater employees in federal court, the firm used child prostitutes at its compound in Baghdad's fortified Green Zone.

The declarations added Iraqi minors got involve in sexual acts with Blackwater members in exchange for one dollar and Erik Prince, the firm's owner, "failed to stop the ongoing use of prostitutes, including child prostitutes, by his men."

Based on other statements, the firm was involved in another sex scandal; "Prince's North Carolina operations had an ongoing wife-swapping and sex ring, which was participated in by many of Mr. Prince's top executives." - Source, Presstv.ir, http://edition.presstv.ir/detail/102887.html


Further it said –

"Based on other statements, the firm was involved in another sex scandal; "Prince's North Carolina operations had an ongoing wife-swapping and sex ring, which was participated in by many of Mr. Prince's top executives."



Seems this is quite the trend with American Government Contractors -


Rumsfeld's "Dyncorp"


Dick Cheney's "Haliburton"


Haliburton and the Military Industrial Complex


@2:07 National Press Conference Dinner
Two seats away from Dick Cheney and
Opposite the podium from Cheney's daughter Liz
is none other that child abuction victim Jeff Gannon

Remember him?

Johnny Gosch/Jeff Gannon

Geraldo reporting on the abduction
Ironically some unknown "detective" claims the
children in the photo are NOT Johnny and are models
Excuse me - What are they modeling? Abduction gear???


And the one who confessed to assisting in
abucting Gosch when he was eleven?


Part of a 1993 interview with Paul Bonacci
where he is asked about Bohemian Grove Killing of
another boy.  He's very upset - lots of sniffling



Paul Bonacci talks with Ted Gunderson

This ties Boystown Scandal to D.C. Call Boys Scandal to Barney Frank, George Bush, Dick Cheney and Bill Clinton.


"Bonacci was also able to accurately describe the lay out of the Bohemian grove, and had relayed in great descriptive detail, the stone owl on the premises, years before any of this was public knowledge or spoken about in Cathy O'briens "Tranceformation of America". – Source, video description

Hunter S. Thompson was living in San Francisco at the time Bonacci names [the summer of 85] and he was working around the porn industry. He was living at the O'Farrel porno theater in SF, where he was working on a story for playboy" – Source, video description


Back to the security firm of "Blackwater" the website quoted a news source as saying this:

"Prince also allegedly forced health professional to endorse the redeployment of those Blackwater members who had been mental problems, such as excessive drinking and drug abuse.

Other charges against the firm include arms smuggling, money laundering and tax evasion.

The criminal activities of the firm first came under scrutiny after a group of the firm's members who were tasked to guard US diplomats in Iraq opened fire on civilians in Baghdad on September 2007, killing 17 people.

According to federal contract data obtained by The Nation, the Obama administration has recently extended a contract with Blackwater for more than $20 million for "security services" in Iraq. "


Blackwater has since been purchased by Monsanto, who now has their own armed security force.

So as you can see, this is across party lines.


Hunter S. Thompson was one of the ones named that filmed the child snuff films and sacrifices at Bohemian Grove, one of which Paul Bonacci talks about.  Hunter S. Thompson was also a Hollywood darling, which I don't understand at all.  Reportedly committing suicide in March of 2005, Many of Hollywood's elite attended a memorial at Hunter's Ranch in Colorado.

Would this be the same ranch in which Dick Cheney schedules and participates in human hunts, sometimes with children?  (written about in Brice Taylor’s book, “Thanks for the Memories”.)

"Stars such as Jack Nicholson, Johnny Depp, John Cusack and Sean Penn turned out for the private memorial service of gonzo journalist Hunter S. Thompson last weekend -- and Nicholson even paid tribute with his own hand-drawn portraits of the late writer.

In the sketches, photos of which were obtained by PEOPLE, Nicholson depicts Thompson with his trademark cigarette, cap and sunglasses, with quotes such as "All were not wrong" and "How'd ya like the elk heart." (Thompson once famously delivered a bleeding elk heart to Nicholson's house as a joke.) " - Source, People Magazine, http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,1036621,00.html

Yeah, Hunter is a real charmer.

Johnny Depp starred in a Screenplay written by Thomspon S. Hunter in 1998 called "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas" and counts him as one of his good friends. - Source, IMDb http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120669/


Which brings us back to the entertainment industry and Michael.


This is Hunter S. Thompson


I tried to find some kind of exposure to Thompson that Michael might have had.  I did not find any direct connections to Michael. But I found a LOT of INDIRECT connections - all over Hollywood.

Tomorrow we cover more about Hunter S. Thompson and Paul Bonacci.


Michael I am TRYING!  I'm not getting any help here . . . .:o(



77 comments:

  1. Well since you asked I don't see in those pictures the reaction from Michael you see. I see a face on Michael that I've seen before. I don't see a terrorized man, perhaps a little shy, maybe something funny was being said.

    I don't agree with you on your speculation regarding the children. Unless you have DNA tests,which proves they are not from Michael, your point is lost honestly. This is the same line that keeps being told over and over again but it doesn't make it right. Have you seen the kids in person? If you did you might see a darker olive skin complexion-not that that proves anything at all. That happened quite often to Michael even. Paris is 14, to call her a slut, well that isn't a name to call any pre-teen. You may not like their behavior but it isn't right to call them names - it's called shaming and it is detrimental to a young girls developing sense of self as a young woman. Do you know who she is at all, except for what you are picking up off the internet and on twitter feeds? She was raised by Michael Jackson and Michael Jackson did not live in a box of societal conformity. Therefore, it doesn't surprise me that Paris is expressing herself in the manner she is. Michael wore dark mascara around his eyes, for all we know, in her grieving process, she is wearing it to connect with her Dad in some way. None of us know who that little girl is, neither do we know her life growing up with Michael - we can speculate.

    The Dealz guy Siggy, "Dealz", is a nickname. He actually sings some pretty good Hip Hop rap, I'm not usually into it but pretty good. Yes - his estate alliance is clear and until I know the truth (not the internet speculation truth) I can say "I don't know". I can speculate but I truly don't know.

    Michael - loved - adored - treasured his kids. In honor of him and his way of living according to Jesus' teachings I will not resort to judging, assuming, speculating. I will not do that to those children of his. It's none of my business.
    That's my 2 cents Bonnie - I'm just expressing my truth and not trying to dump it on you to change you in any way.I understand we each have to draw our own conclusions which are filtered through our beliefs. I would hate to see the kids pounded with these speculations about there heritage and if they were truly their faather's child. I wouldn't have liked hearing that at all.

    All the best to you and I hope you had a treasured Mother's Day.

    Oh, as well, I am around kids Paris' age frequently and they all tallk about the Illuminati, secret societies, they show the signs. I don't think they truly understand it but "conspiracy" talk and all of it is very popular amongst many of them. It is interesting, honestly, because I grew up not hearing about it at all till I got older. Also, 14, shock factor is in effect and generates alot of the way they talk and act.

    LorLor

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LorLor,

      Look at his eyes in those pictures. You are not going to convince me that those eyes are HOLDING BACK A LAUGH. Are you blind?

      Fine, you don't agree with me speculating on the children. Well, I'm not the one that put them out there. There is not one eye, nose, mouth, hair color or texture that REMOTELY matches Michael's . . . none. You can fantasize all day that Klein didn't have a part in fathering those children. That doesn't make them fathered by Michael. My point is lost on the unobservant and the delusional. That's no surprise to me, and the fact that the ONLY time you seem to comment is when it is along the lines of the stalker chicks which brings up another point. I did NOT call Paris a slut. I called the STALKER CHICKS sluts. Learn to read.

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Michael LOVE, TREASURE AND ADORE ALL CHILDREN? Not just HIS?

      And if you were doing anything close to honoring Michael's honor of living the way "Jesus teaches", then you would not be taking ownership of "truth". That's new age slang and I'm sick of hearing it. You tell THE TRUTH or you're a liar. There are some that don't like THE TRUTH so they make up their own. I've seen that before too.

      I agree with you on one thing . . . it's "NONE OF OUR BUSINESS". And if that's the case, then they need to get those kids off the internet. WE'RE not the ones putting them out there, marketing them, telling them to throw up devil worshiping signs, so if they don't care how Paris conducts herself, then their not concerned with the reflection she puts out there of her dad raising her.

      My mother day turned crappy real fast after seeing that. It just reminded me what kind of people were around Michael, and where his children might have been while they were busy sticking him with I.V.'s! But you don't care about any of that. Your truth is behind rose colored glasses. Happy mothers day to you too. I hope you're more vigilant with your children then the Jackson's are being with Michael's.

      Delete
  2. OWL FARM could be a bit of a giveaway ! The fortified compound of Hunter S Thompson.

    TL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wonder why they murdered him if he was so devoted?

      Delete
  3. I read about him the other day when you mentioned his name to me. It seems some think he killed himself and others think he may have been killed. Something to do with 911 info perhaps. He had a bit of a following . The interview you showed above, on Letterman, was a bit of a worry. He seems very scattered, stressed. I read he was a drinker so perhaps that's why he appears as he does. I do know that the locals were unimpressed with the arrival of the Hollywood guys at his funeral. Its all rather suspicious. I would really need to read alot more about him to try to make sense of him. I'd not heard of him till you made mention of him.

    I do think people out there are trying to draw attention to the plight of the children....as in, all children who are being mistreated in any way. Now, I do believe in raising children with discipline, manners and so forth. Its most important. I'm tired of the brats that abound. I do know though that if they were cared for properly and knew the boundaries and were taught respect and shown love they wouldn't be brats (small chance).

    I'm sick and tired of grown adults taking no responsibility for their babies. No matter the circumstances, once you are a parent, that's it.If you are old enough to rumble in the jungle then you are obviously old enough to deal with the possible outcome of said rumble. Time to grow up and get a grip on reality. Raise your children, don't drag them up or mistreat them to where they end up running away and getting into terrible trouble which screws their minds and souls for life. Its a travesty. I'm over self absorbed @(#$T^@__+($@T& beep beeps !!

    TL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TL,

      On Thompson, I had read that those speculating he had been killed had to do with the exposure of Johnny Gosch as Jeff Gannon (Hunter was found dead just days after). I remember Thompson as a snuff film producer, not as a Hollywood screen play writer. Scattered? I got that too. It was like listening to Letterman's interview with Joaquim Phoenix (you remember that one,right?)

      You're right. I know others ARE drawing attention to the plight of children - some of them are the very ones that were abused by those people in the establishment. Discipline and manners was something my mother drilled into me, unfortunately though not in what I would call a constructive manner. I feared ALL adults to the point of not talking about the abuse I received. I couldn't even tell my peers "no". Everyone was my boss.

      I was different with my children - of course my mother thought I was 'too permissive', but I wasn't. My children didn't get away with everything and I let them enjoy childhood. And they enjoyed childhood without leaving any victims. I have some regrets with my oldest with regard to the Aspergers and the school system but I protected him.

      Rumble in the Jungle. THANK YOU! The physical "becoming one" with your spouse is a gift that God gave us and like anything else he gave us gets USED AND ABUSED. Society has been talked into downgrading the act of "murder" to the act of "choice".

      Delete
    2. Please excuse my expression Rumble in the Jungle. I was just trying to make a point. Love is respectful, lust is just lust. Two becoming one (thinking of marriage here) is SACRED.

      TL

      Delete
    3. I thought it was cute. We are on the same wavelength with the Love vs. Lust definitions. Love = becoming one/sacred/matrimony = one in God.

      Delete
  4. Hunter loathed Richard Nixon but would vote for him over Bush any day (so I read).

    TL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's something. Nixon was pictured at Bohemian Grove with Ronald Reagan back in the 1960's. There is a recording of Nixon describing Bohemian Grove as the "faggiest G-- D------ think you ever saw". In that same sentence he said he would never shake hands with anyone from San Francisco. Bush on the other hand, according to two books, swung both ways and were rather Sodomistic in their morals. Perhaps Thompson really didn't enjoy what he did?

      Delete
    2. Its amazing to discover which of your Presidents has done what, where. I've read some nasty info and might go and grab it again tomorrow.

      TL

      Delete
  5. I had to show you this pic. http://dontejackson13.tumblr.com/post/22788085820

    TL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TL,

      From Luke 17 -

      20 And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation:

      21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.

      22 And he said unto the disciples, The days will come, when ye shall desire to see one of the days of the Son of man, and ye shall not see it.

      23 And they shall say to you, See here; or, see there: go not after them, nor follow them.

      24 For as the lightning, that lighteneth out of the one part under heaven, shineth unto the other part under heaven; so shall also the Son of man be in his day.

      25 But first must he suffer many things, and be rejected of this generation.

      26 And as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man."

      Many people take that to mean that God is not a sovereign being. I wonder what Donte believes?

      Delete
    2. You really don't want to know, trust me! It upsets me so much, I can't talk about it, except to show you the pic.

      TL

      Delete
    3. TL,

      Donte is the one that posts the typical, esoteric, New World You are God stuff. Jaafar is the one that posts the anti-Illuminati stuff.

      I think it's important to point out thanks to your post that we should all remember . . . if WE were God? There would be no reason for the death of Christ.

      Delete
    4. I am hoping beyond all hope that Donte and the others are simply doing all this (on their sites)for a 'particular reason' at the moment. With all things Michael you will find contrariness, opposing thought and so on so lets hope that that is all that Donte and the rest are doing (just for the sake of this 'hoax' for want of a better word). This New Age stuff upsets me more than I can say. Everywhere you turn, there they are.


      TL

      Delete
    5. Well, Donte's dad posts on Twitter about us "Lovelies" and Jaafar's daddy usually posts in regard to Michael or the case. Decoys? Possibly.

      Right now we are getting this horrible thunderstorm. I'm half tempted to look up and say 'I'm sorry!' But I don't know if I did anything wrong. We have flooding down here. It's been storming all day.

      The New age stuff. Just deleted a bunch of "Michael is in purgatory and can't handle it" and "Michael is Christ/ the seven chakras" posts.

      You know what I'm thinking don't you?

      Delete
    6. People send you that stuff??

      It is a very very serious problem. It is what I read alot of. It has permeated every agency, charity, many church groups, govt, just everywhere. They have plans (and strangely enough, Michaels ideals he conveyed have been used by some of these dangerous people to make many think Michael was on side). I iimplore people to pay mind.

      TL

      Delete
    7. I hope they do. Matthew 24.

      Delete
  6. I kind of sensed that "kids are Kleins!/Gellers/name any other
    fishy Jew here" coming, but didn't expect it so soon.
    It doesn't matter what I say now, everything will
    be met with attack of sorts, calling me delusional and blind,
    so I only hope in time deception won't go deeper and everyone
    will see mistakes or snap judgments they passed clearly,
    and admitting these openly won't be impossible thing to do, too.
    It never was impossible for me, so it's for everyone.

    People, do not be led easily and think for yourselves, think.
    Your opinions and thoughts should really be yours.

    And, of course, remember the children.
    Help and protect all the children, it's best
    and relevant advice. Always.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Anonymous,

      Well, LorLor took this as me attacking the children. I am not. I am not attacking Michael either as I do not believe HE even had a say in this. I do not believe that Michael went to Debbie and said "have my children" nor did he agree to this. Michael was still under control of Klein at the time and Hoefflin was TRYING to get an investigation started against Klein and Rowe because he believed they were poisoning Michael.

      Michael being Michael wanted NOTHING to do with the adults who conspired this garbage and KNEW they would use any children he might have as a bargaining chip. But he loved them because they were INNOCENT CHILDREN IN A CONSPIRACY.

      Michael being afraid of them getting his DNA and having his hair dressers sweep up clippings into a bag I believe was a clue that he knew what they were trying to do.

      I also THANK YOU for saying that - to remember the children and continue to fight for them and protect them, which is EXACTLY why I posted what I posted above. I never expected to get so emotional over someone elses children. There was a reason they did this and BELIEVE ME it was NOT for the good of those children OR Michael. These people USE, ABUSE AND TAKE POSSESSION of people. This was not in God's plan.

      And if I was Paris' mother, I would be protecting her whether SHE liked it or not!

      Delete
    2. Diane just emailed me about the video/promo/clips of Paris' Movie and said "Did you notice that they got a definite shot of a Pepsi can"?

      Anonymous who posted about "fishy jews" - re-reading your post, I think I know who you are. And you are right. People should think for themselves. We've been carried along on this "delusion" for three years. Quite long enough, don't you think? How many more people have to be hurt? Lied to? Taken advantage of? Mislead?

      Snap judgements? It's been three years. I've protected that lie until now so consider yourself lucky that's all I've revealed.

      Delete
  7. We do not know for certain if Paris and Prince are or are not Michael Jackson's biological children. In interviews he has said they are biologically his. Many bloggers encourage us all to listen to Michael's words in interviews rather than reading all the crap put out in writing. I choose to listen to Michael's own words. Paris just started retweeting after being absent for several weeks after she posted pics of herself and her friends in swimsuits. Perhaps the Jacksons finally stepped in for that two week period. On Mother's Day Paris tweeted about going out of her room, looking around, and going back inside (not her exact words) but I thought very sad on Mother's Day this child does not have and never has had a mother in the true sense of the word. Seems grandma doesn't have any objection to Paris' "look" as who else would have agreed for Paris to be among People trashmag's 100 most beautiful, May 7 issue?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's just it. There has never been any direct, televised quote of Michael saying they are biologically his. Bashir's interview? He gives us an argument that Paris' "green eyes" could very well be from Joe, but doesn't say they are. He never comes right and and says yes, they are biologically his. All he says is that Paris is "conceived in Paris".

      Michael has also told us time and again that he is told to lie by his label. In the Geraldo Interview Michael call them "the children". In the MTV interview Michael calls them "The children". He never uses the word "his".

      I have gone back and forth over this for the last few weeks (as soon as I started on the DNA research and chromosomes) over what Michael has said, when he said it (Geller controlling, mind control, Boteach etc...) and like others have said a PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS. Look at those above.

      Then there is just common sense. Look at the children. Do either of the oldest look like Michael? At ALL? Where is Michael in those children?

      You know, if we are TRULY going to help Michael, we can't just discard evidence just because it isn't popular. They DID THIS for a reason! And it's not because Michael wanted children, he HAD children all over the world.

      Why would these people move hell and earth to stop Michael from helping these children then turn around and LET HIM have his own? Why did the mother have to be Jewish? Why do they resemble Klein and Debbie more than they resemble Michael?

      There is a lot more to this than just Michael being tortured or tazered to tell a tale in front of a camera for Bashir!

      Delete
  8. Michael's children, mainly Prince I & Paris, lost their cute childhood the day Michael disappeared : the world spotlights suddenly all over with honors & attention rebounding on them by extension of Michael's world fame : any 12-14 years old can be dazzled & unbalanced by it. The MJ3 are not unbalanced but Michael, their beloved Daddy & Light, is gone. The influence now exerciced on them by their own personal & showbiz environment, particularly at this vulnerable teenage period, might be damaging for their character but let's wait how things turn when they grow older, hopefully for the best. The MJ3 are EXPOSED too early in fact so I still see them as innocents. Paris is a beautiful girl just following the teenager's prototype I see all over around : very precocious & influenced by today's teenage fashion, music & behaviour & above all, she is attracted maybe but anyhow already pushed into the showbiz system. Badly Michael is gone, Katherine thanks God still there but other influences are already on these kids. The wheel is spinning & will still accelerate, the MJ3 will even be more coveted in the future. Paris & her siblings now enjoy teenage playful craziness, joy & lavish life with Katherine & cousins & friends, but if they all "choose" showbiz seriously later, I do hope they will be well prepared psychologically. God Protect them..they'll need it...unless as adults later, they fully embrace & play with the "system"..you know what I mean.

    But even out of showbiz & as a mother you know better, once a kid goes to school & socializes with friends, he/she gradually takes distances with the parents' own educational efforts making it difficult to keep their child protected from our nowadays society's external dangers &/or negative influences. Adversely, one of my former bosses told me only a few years ago that he always taught good manners & behaviour to his own boy. Result ? the poor kid was mobbed at school by real rowdy ones up to the point this father had to teach his son to become instead much tougher to "survive" at school. The school playground's problems always existed but educating a child properly & alltogether making him armoured for our society nowadays is a real challenge for parents.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Line,

      This must have been a tough topic for you to comment on. Personally, I still think they are cute, but their mixed messages are not. I agree with everything you said and your sentiments that they are too young. This is not okay. I'm sorry but it is not.

      I have trouble trying to put together a "breaking out" of teenagers. They didn't lose their father "normally", they didn't have a "normal" upbringing and they know what was done to their father or at least a great majority of it. Unless Michael's handlers did more of the raising of them than he did and that is what scares me.

      Michael and his likeness is and will be used and molded to their agenda. I have no reason to believe that they are not attempting to do the same with children they believe are also their property.

      Delete
  9. BONNIE, "A tough topic for me to comment" ? I'm eager to know WHY or ..maybe I better not know ? :o) But your reply I received loud & clear : yes, "their property", exactly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Line,

      I thought maybe this would be hard for you. Just got off the phone with Micheline (she during lunch break) and I couldn't stop crying long enough to be coherent. I don't even know what I said to her. Telling the truth sometimes hurts the deliverer as much as it hurts the recipient. And there are people for which this deception is potentially very, very lucrative.

      My concerns?

      Did they shock Michael's children too? Drug them? Isolate them from their dad?

      These people do not love. They don't know what love is.

      They covet, they steal, they take possession.

      I was onto something with the DNA (and I'm not the first), not just with Michael but with all of us.

      Delete
  10. Katherine Jackson Interview on CNN today 9pm. A mother's day Interview. Just incase someone reading this blog missed that info. I think it's on Piers Morgan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I saw that anonymous, thank you. I don't know if I can watch at this point but I will try. I'm getting very Jackson-weary right now. It would be really nice if something resembling reality would be forthcoming SOMETIME in the near future.

      I have a blog due tonight. It's about deception. Hopefully I'll get it up before 9pm. Thanks again for reminding everyone.

      Delete
  11. Well? If the "end" is coming "with a flood" then it is probably starting at my house! I do have a blog for tonight. Whether it gets up tonight or not remains to be seen.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I wish I could find that article where Michael says he was never having any children. This had something to do with Joe and Michael having a negative relationship early on. On the other hand I think of Joe's good friend telling us that ITS ALL JUST A MOVIE (Joe just acting like he's the bad guy).Then we have Frank C telling us that Michael needed a family to do a deal with some Sheik/Prince or other and Debbie stepping in so kindly. Although he'd initially said he'd never father his own children there is always the option to change ones mind. Michael loved all children so that would include Prince, Paris and Blanket.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do you want me to try? (to find the article). Circa??? approximate year? And I don't know who "Joe's good friend" is. Majestik? Leonard Rowe?

      I agree with you that Michael loved all children. It goes without saying Prince, Paris and Blanket. Someone posted "Geller" instead of the one who's running around now claiming he is Blanket's father. Blanket has dimples. But Blanket also looks more like Obee. And Obee is someone else that seems to just pop in there during Michael's "conditioning" days seemingly without any trouble from the handlers.

      I don't remember seeing Michael saying he would never have his own children.

      Remember the notes supposedly found all over Carolwood? The ones they say Michael wrote? The "No violence ever" notes? As if he could commit violence.

      Delete
    2. www.youtube.com/watch?v=PG9S915GNPc

      WHAT DID MARSHALL THOMPSON SAY HOW JOE JACKSON FEELS ABOUT MICHAEL JACKSON CHILDREN?

      That strangely worded title is the name of the vid where Joes friend Marshall speaks. He is Joe's partner in Marantz label/company. Remember?? Joe was promoting this company soon after Michaels 'leaving' at BET awards I think it was and everyone went nuts at joe for seeming unfeeling.

      Obee, Life is a Movie.

      Michael behind that camera next to Kenny.

      And as a friend reminded me, the article with Katherine filming Michael.

      I have this fixation about all of this being the longest script ever written and played out....another Guiness Book of REcords notice for Michael.

      I am not making light of Michaels dire situation when I say this. I just think he had a plan set out. He would never have his Mother lie but by all accounts it seems she has, or has had a memory loss, which I guess is acceptable at her age BUT if its part of a script, then you are not at fault. Insane thoughts.

      Michael is known for filming every move that is tied to himself.

      TL

      Delete
    3. TL,

      LIFEISAMOVIE, LIFEISAMOVIE, LIFEISAMOVIE!

      Michael behind the camera with Kenny (was that really him? Forehead seems kind of sloped. Maybe the angle).

      The very first dream I had about Michael, I WAS BEHIND A CAMERA and I was filming a wrestling match with a counterfeit Michael trying to dance in the ring around the wrestling match. I could see the REAL Michael outside the ropes, but ONLY when I looked through the camera. When I pulled back to look with the naked eye, I couldn't see him. And I could only hear him when I looked in the camera and what he was saying to the kid faking him in the ring was "come on kid, dance! Move! Do SOMETHING!" and I woke up.

      If you ask me, I think the script was written before Michael began dramatizing it IF this is really Michael.

      The script you mention, if Miss Katherine is indeed following one, could be the "strong delusion" and if it is . . . Well, let's just say we know how it ends.

      Delete
    4. Gosh Bonnie, that's a vivid dream you had.

      Yes, we don't really know if it was Michael or some other Michael behind the camera with Kenny. I just remember Michaels nephew making a point to tell us all about the particular camera and how he is now using that one himself (that brand/type).RED camera's. I thought it ann odd thing for him to specifically point out to us all.

      It could be that the script is someone else's, for sure. Either way, it seems there is a script in place. I pray its Michael one step ahead of them all, with the help of his family. Katherine told us Dr Murray came and broke the news of Michaels 'passing' to her and yet on Piers she said she'd never met him to this day! Memory loss or script?

      The very obvious Liberian Girl "shots" of Michael at the Memorial may just have been the bad peoples way of making us think Michael is behind what's going on. That could be their own doing....just not sure yet. The paganistic show that was put on that day has worried me no end. I still cannot decide if it was Michael trying to tell us all about these pagans (because we know he wouldn't have a ritual done like that for himself) or was it the opposition (who would love to have Michael known as their offering).

      I often go over the lyrics of Life Is A Movie!

      TL

      Delete
    5. TL,

      Have you read this?

      http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2010/08/curtain-call-for-norma-jean-god-bless.html

      I wrote it back in August of 2010 . . . before I knew any of the stuff that I've researched this year. And when I wrote that, it was one of those things that I had no idea where it came from. I'm not that poetic, normally. Tell me what you think.

      Delete
  13. I forgot to add to what I just left about Michael initially saying he would never have children etc that.....Arnold Klein made a point of having legal input regarding Prince and Paris' education and so forth when Michael 'left'. For some reason this was done quite openly. Also, over the period of time I've seen two comments elsewhere that might tie in: one person suggesting the children were actors from the get go. The second was that the children couldn't tell which "michael" they were with on occasion. These may mean nothing much but have just 'stuck' in my head.

    Once again, this whole 'acting' theme seems to be prevalent. Joe is just acting, the kids could be actors, Michael ALWAYS showing us what he has DIRECTED himself. Life is a movie.


    TL.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Crying . . .

      "The attorney for Dr. Arnold Klein asked to be heard. Mark Vincent Kaplan said that Dr. Klein, who was present, was concerned about Joe Jackson's involvement with the children and wanted input as to the education and welfare of Prince, 12 and Paris, age 11. (Kaplan, also happens to be Kevin Federline's lawyer.) The judge ruled that Dr. Klein had no legal standing in the case and that Michael Jackson and Debbie Rowe are recognized as the parents. There have been rumors that Klein is actually the biological father of the two older Jackson children. The lawyers for Katherine Jackson said that they were perplexed as to what Dr. Klein was actually trying to accomplish by petitioning the court to be heard in the custody hearing. However, the judge did say that he could raise objections in the future."

      Source, http://voices.yahoo.com/surprise-jackson-hearing-dermatologist-klein-challenges-3943734.html

      sources for article: Sources: CNN
      TMZ
      MSNBC
      FOX News
      LA Times

      They need to keep that thug away from the kids.

      Delete
    2. RECOGNIZED as the parents? Indeed why was Klein even there and why did the judge grant that he could raise objections in the future?

      Delete
    3. Then of course we forgot all about these tweets between the loathsome Klein and the equally loathsome LIZ Taylor:

      Dr. Arnold Klein is Tweeting back at Elizabeth Taylor over the legendary actress' recent implication that he supplied Michael Jackson with lovers ... of both genders.

      The Twitter-tongue-lashing he got resulted from comments he made about MJ's sex life, saying he was gay and confirming rumors of an affair with Jason Pfeiffer.

      Taylor lambasted Klein for betraying Michael's confidentiality and trust, and got in an extra dig that the dermatologist supplied Jackson with men as well as women.

      Both Pfeiffer and Jackson's former wife Debbie Rowe worked in Klein's office (Klein is also rumored to be the father of MJ's kids, but that's neither here nor there).

      He counter-Twittered Friday: "Dearest Elizabeth Michael CHOSE whom he loved; I only SUPPLIED medical care. May God bless you and Michael. Your friend Arnie."

      Was Michael Jackson gay? Is Arnold Klein lying? Did the doctor betray the star's trust? Was Elizabeth Taylor out of line? The list of questions goes on and on ...



      Read more celebrity gossip at: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/stars/arnold-klein/page-2.html#ixzz1uvskJGLT

      Delete
    4. More: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/stars/arnold-klein/page-3.html

      I know these are old - 2009 but it doesn't make sense. Why would Klein's lawyer show up in court, demand interest in education/raising of Michael's kids, be told he had no "legal standing" but could "petition" properly. Then Klein turns around and says "to the best of my knowledge" I'm not the biological father.

      Did he get threatened? (Bruce Ayers - Key - Now dead?)

      Delete
    5. TL, you asked me about Rosa Koire. Not sure if you thought SHE was dangerous or what she was reporting on was dangerous (or both). I can tell you I don't trust her but I don't know that much about her. Didn't dig into her yet in earnest.

      Delete
    6. My interest in Miss Koire is based only on the subject she brings to public notice. I read about it prior to discovering her but the title of her long long video was "behind the green mask". I think Agenda 21 is of great concern.

      TL

      Delete
    7. Yes, I agree. I was surprised to see her call out Agenda 21. But we have to remember that these "plans" are not the end of their plan. They are creating the chaos. Their next step is to have the "beast" disguised as the "savior" come in and shut down all the "bad guys".

      In the Bible, in Revelation, the "10 horns" which are the ten kings without a nation but have power "one hour with the beast" will turn on the "whore". I believe that is Israel or the Mystery Babylon religion behind the Judaism and occupation of Israel (the state of).

      This "Savior" will be the false Christ and that is where I believe (as you seem to also) the false prophet will arise from.

      You think of Michael's "brain" being removed during autopsy (hate this talk but has to be done). And I keep going back to Michael's lyrics (and adlibs) in "This Time Around", "Is it Scary" and "Threatened".

      Delete
    8. OH yes, I'm well aware of the fact that a CRISIS has to be established first and foremost and then the savoiur (fake) swoops in to SAVE the day. And Agenda 21 could be just that, the CRISIS (or part of it). Meantime it is a definate issue for all people. I can see the effects of this nonsense already, way over here in Oz. People cannot do a damned thing on their own properties. No one has a leg to stand on.

      I know which 'mystery group' is ready to swoop in and save the day (or so they think). They are the antithesis of christian. In fact, they have 'plans' for Christians. Not very nice ones.

      TL

      Delete
    9. We're starting that here too - "eminent Domain gone berserk". They are trying to outlaw private food gardens here. Then you just want to slap those that are saying "this is a good thing! People are polluting the soil and ruining habitat". Well, where do they think their spinach and lettuce salad they are eating came from? Utopia?

      Delete
  14. Have you read or watched Rosa Koire? The problems she discusses all began with these 'futurists' (aka New Agers,paganists).

    I'll leave a 1988 quote from a dangerous woman that I have been reading on for a very long time now..."Now all the resonating core groups with outwardly different purposes are merging and blending and coming together to do THE ONE WORK". You don't need to display this comment Bonnie. I'm just letting you know why I think alot of what we see is all tied in to a much grander scheme. I do believe Michael has been used in this, or was trying to prevent these types of people from getting their way. These peoples ideals are already well embedded into society/culture now and its getting worse every day. They have managed to get their foot into doors that count, those that get around the law, or rather , make laws. Such a disaster. Christianity is their number one enemy. Anyhow, I guess I've veered off on a tangent. As always, trying to figure out the reason for the funny business on June 25th 09.

    TL

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hello Bonnie glad you finally tackled this subject which has been on alot of minds. It is so very tragic these children are being disected like lab animals just like Michael was. I'm guilty of questioning their paternity even did comparison of Prince to Klein and no I am not proud of myself. Ultimately I decided biology doesn't matter Michael is their Daddy. I feel as many do that Paris was offerred to the cyberspace wolves to be abused, she has a tremendous following of loyal subjects to do whatever is asked of them. Paris's final 'initiation' IMO was the Grammys. They were all innocents when they were with Michael you can still see that innocence in their faces at the memorial/funeral. Very evident that innocence was taken from them since their whole look and attitudes changed before our very eyes particularly Paris. The whole family is under the evil spell Janet didn't step up in defense of Paris while she was being tortured on the internet. Instead Paris was handed to LaToya IMO because Janet said Michael was in denial and addicted to drugs while LaToya said Michael was murdered. Of course they have Paris handled by the one capturing the most fanbase interest and loyalty to promote their agenda. My heart hurts so much for Michael, his children and his family. On the other hand I am ever so grateful through Michael I'm awakened to see what's going on all around the world and am reconnected to God. Although I want to walk away turn a blind eye I can't but I do stay out of the cyber chatter as much as possible and notice many trouble makers on Twitter are leaving all part of the plan. I do my best to counter darkness by shining the light and love of God faith perserverance and hope every day while asking the angels to protect all children everywhere. I keep the faith that God is always in control even when it doesn't seem that way. God Bless us all.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous,

    I agree with you as far as who those children love as "daddy", Paternity doesn't matter. If it did, a lot of adopted children would be disenfranchised from their relationships with their parents.

    What DOES matter to me, is the leverage being used or that WILL be used to get to the children. It's already being used apparently.

    It also is important to bring this up not to dissect the children as you said, but to dissect WHAT their plans are and why they did this to Michael in the first place. Maybe that doesn't matter NOW, but it matters in piecing together the motives of these people, and how far they went to control Michael.

    I agree with you that Paris' whole countenance seems to have changed.

    I too stay out of the cyberchatter (meaning Twitter, for the most part). I don't go to the fan forums unless I see a referral link in my stats (to see what they are talking about in regard to this blog), but I don't seek them out for info. I don't follow the Jacksons except perhaps Jermaine now. I think he's the only one. I have never followed Prince and Paris because for a long time, I didn't believe they were the real kids. Sometimes I still don't.

    God is in control. Whether we understand at the moment what he is doing or not. :o)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bonnie you should a see this coming them executors gonna use the money to get to these kids from long time...i saw it coming.

      Delete
    2. Hi JA - I did see this coming. Many did. Just didn't think the Jacksons would let it happen and I'm not happy about it.

      Delete
  17. Even if you have the greatest parents on the planet it comes a day when adopted children want to know who their biological parents are. Perhaps Paris, Prince and Blanket also want to know who their biological parents are when they become adults. Or maybe they already know. I watched a program series years ago were adopted children searched for their biological parents. All of them said the same thing afterwards. To meet their biological parents made them happy and they felt whole/complete as a person. Before they knew who their biological parents were they had identity crises and felt that a part of who they are was missing. But they still loved and considered the parents they grew up with to be their real parents. Most of them kept in touch with their biological parents after they met the first time. I don't think it is a good thing to keep the truth about who MJ3's biological parents are from the children. Because it will make them suffer in the future as adults. And if they are told the truth they will still love MJ and see him as their father.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmmmm . . . I don't think they want to know THAT! LOL! But I understand what you are saying.

      I don't doubt who THEY consider their daddy. I worry what goes on around them, and these vermin crawling up out of the sewers trying to lay possession of them. Branca manages their allowance, and since he's seen fit to sell Michael's likeness to the demons, what do you think his plans are for the children?

      I am so glad I don't have money. I don't have to worry about any of that garbage, but now that I know what is on it? I DEFINITELY don't want it.

      Delete
    2. Lol, maybe you're right that they don't want to know if they knew who it was. NO MONEY - PROBLEMS, LOTS OF MONEY - MORE PROBLEMS. Yeah, the pyramid, that is sick. Maybe you better get euro money or something. There is no pyramid on those YET I think.

      Delete
  18. Bonnie yoou went in this is too much info LOL i thought you loved Debbie wat happenend LOL????

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What happened? Research.

      Delete
    2. JA - This blog is a work in progress. You have to remember back in 2010 when I first started this blog I thought Karen Faye was a truthful person. Everyone that has read this blog from the beginning is traveling this road with me. You are trying to catch up to almost Three years of research and writing.

      Delete
  19. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsSp78gq8UQ Bonnie I am confused about everything I am gonna take it to Jesus in prayer i do not like how these kids are in the spotlight so much fro day one what u tweeting bout illuminati what Ms katherine doing oh lord. Anyway look at that video and tell me if you think this is really Michael everyone say this a double. Prince sure looks like klein LOL only blanket look like michael sorry... and Bonnie he does not look happy in them pics but he was very happy talking about his kids I mean he owned them so he must have accepted they did not belong to him. Michael gotta take responsibility for his choices and marrying debbie cause katherine talked him into it...i just wanted to smack him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi JA,

      No. I do not think that is Michael (the real one). The reason I don't believe that is Michael is because I have three of those pictures from that event in a big picture book. One of the shots of him shows him with his hands up (holding the microphone) and you can see down his sleeve below his wrists and honestly, it looks like a pair of hands that do not belong on those wrists. It almost looks like a bigger hand is taped over the real one and perhaps made up. I have some pics about that from a year ago and some new ones too of what they possibly did (testing things). If you want my HONEST opinion, I believe we have seen very little of the REAL Michael between 2005 and 2009.

      Yes, Michael was happy talking about the kids but he never called them his. He called them "the children". Thus far anyway that's what I have caught going back over old interviews ( where HE is talking not what they quoted in print which could have been faked). And in the pictures with Debbie Rowe, especially THAT one with his hand on her belly? He looks terrified and on the verge of tears. I really, REALLY having a hard time with that picture and I DO NOT LIKE THAT WOMAN and what she possibly took part in. Why I didn't ever scrutinize that picture before was because I ASSUMED Debbie Rowe was his friend because she defended him. Never make that mistake again (famous last words).

      I don't think Miss Katherine talked him into ANYTHING because I don't believe Michael PLANNED on having children. So that is probably a trumped up story too.

      Delete
  20. Bonnie di post is di best LOL the secretary and the pentago woman cant even answer those simple questions mere fact they are stuttering and tumbling over there words means a lie is there. Bonnie I had to ggogle Bohemian grove the pics are worth a thousand wordsnI know when they are bowing at an alter is not Jesus they praying to so is who???? everything look and sound demonic bout that club and All the republican presidents are memebers and a few demorcat ones America is officially the whore of babylon for me no sah this government too corrupt and every president has been talking about in their speeches this New World Order.Johnny deep a nastiness!!! he defend Roman Polanski bout Roman should be free and is years it happen.There was proof roman drug sodomize and rape a 14 yr old and him free plus a make movie and winj award and look wha dem do to Michael Bonnie??!!! Bonnie what are they going to tell GOd??? when God come mi sorry fi dem . Hollyweird a soddom gommaroh!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. JA,

      Bohemian Grove - It is a 40 foot tall stone owl that they supposedly create a "fake" body. The ceremony is called "The Cremation of Care", where they are "sacrificing" and "destroying" their ability to "care", their ability to feel empathy. It's a sick ceremony and most of our presidents have taken part in attending this. Not just Republican . . . Democrats too. Clinton was there, so was Carter. This is across party lines.

      Oh, the whore of Babylon. You're not kidding! I can't afford to get out so I'm stuck. Do a Google on the layout of the streets of Washington D.C., our capital. Pentagram. Nice huh?

      I don't know what those people are going to tell God. I just know what God is going to tell THEM.

      Delete
    2. JA,

      I said "where they create a fake body" I MEANT to say they "cremate" a fake body.

      Delete
  21. Bonnie why u tink michael never leave hollywood??? all whitney ?? why them stay after the shame and disgrace hollywood put onthem ??? hollywood have a lifestyle the hype I feel it is hard for these stars to let go of fame and to heal tgem body and mid from the corruption they need to leave hollywood that environment it is toxic all katherine she still there usually when people get older they move back to their origin she still there .

    ReplyDelete
  22. I think Liz was asking not confirming that Klein was supplying him with men and women lovers. I truly do not believe MJ was gay but hey ya never really know

    ReplyDelete
  23. Hey Bonnie,

    Catching up on some reading here. You said "Yes, Michael was happy talking about the kids but he never called them his. He called them "the children"."

    He actually did call them "my children" in the infamous Bashir interview. See the clip below at 4:00 and 4:25.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=2cDWAqqhrIo

    Also, I've thought off and on that the children may not be his biologically. Maybe they are, maybe not. But when you said that they don't have one shred of African American identity in them (at least the older two), I beg to differ. There are some pictures of them that I've seen that look like they could be mixed. You really CANNOT tell from pictures or even in person sometimes if a person is or is not mixed. If I could attach pictures to this post I would. Instead I'm emailing them to you. My three children are mixed. I'm white and my ex is black, much the same shade as Michael was at age 10; my ex has brown eyes, I have hazel; 2 of my kids have brown eyes, 1 has hazel; they are all very light complected but tan very easily in the summer. In these pictures of my kids, you might very well say the same thing, they don't have one shred of African American heritage in them, but yet and still they are mixed. Mixed children come in all shades from dark to very light, with wide noses and narrow, full lips and thin, dark eyes and light. Please do not go by their coloring or features and make the bold statement that they don't have any African American heritage in them. You may turn out to be very wrong.

    Otherwise, a very thought provoking blog...yet again. Take care and God bless.

    Deb

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Deb,

      I thank you for sending pictures of your children. They're beatiful but I have to disagree with you. With the exception of your daughter (who's picture was really too small for me to get a good look) they very much look as if they have some African American in them.

      I'm a little ticked that you would think I was referring to just skin color because I was not. I NEVER said SHADE I said FEATURES. That includes shapes of nose, mouth, HAIR, and skin. So I stand by my statement that Michael's children do NOT have one shred of African American features. None.

      I am also going by the picture above. The wedding shot with Debbie Rowe. Michael looks like they tazered the crap out of him to get him to pose with her. This is supposedly HIS CHILD? that he's putting his hand over? Did YOU look like that when you found out you were pregnant with your ex-husband's children?

      My "bold" statement is not just by photographs. You happen to watch video of the children pushing themselves around on their carts in Michael's house? Michael playing chess with Prince. Paris telling her daddy thank you for the cake and ice cream (birthday). They don't look mixed there either.

      There were possibly three different Michael's in the Bashir interview. Two of them DEFINITELY did not look like the same man. Bashir was filmed in 2002. Right about the time Geller and Boteach were drugging the crap out of him.

      I am fully aware that children come in all sizes, shapes and colors regardless of their heritage. I'm not twelve years old. You act like I just dove onto the scene here and made judgement calls. No, sorry I did not. I agonized over this. I am more concerned with the TRUTH of what they DID TO THIS MAN then trying to talk myself into the fairytale, okay? I would love to believe that Michael fathered these children. But that face above and Klien's involvement with the two oldest and the fact that NO PICTURES EXIST OF MICHAEL GOING TO AND FROM HOSPITALS when he could not escape the paparazzi any other time leaves me VERY UNCONVINCED that this wasn't sprung on Michael as a "gotcha".

      I do not believe Michael agreed for Debbie to have these children. Sorry. Not with that face above and not with the fact that Prince looks exactly like Klein. There is also the issue of the lyrics in Billie Jean which I have gone over before.

      People better start facing the evidence and stop trying to talk themselves out of it. This doesn't mean Michael loves them any less. He would make sure those idiots never got their hands on them regardless.

      the truth is in his song lyrics, not on that DRAMA they made him go through in front of the press and the media.

      Delete
  24. Bonnie, I don't want to pick a fight here but I'm feeling a little put out by your accusatory words. I'm hoping I'm just being a little overly sensitive.

    Going by footage, pictures, etc. I still stand by my opinion that the children COULD be mixed. Just in the pictures above, Prince has fuller lips than either Debbie or Klein and his nose is somewhat broad but so is Klein's. It's certainly not long and pointy like mine (and plenty of other caucasian people's noses). His upper lip has that bow shape that Michael's had, it's not straight like Klein's. His eyebrows have the same shape as Klein's but they're the same shape as Michael's as well (when Michael was younger his eyebrows were not arched they were pretty straight). I said in my post that maybe they are his, maybe not, but I am going by his words, he did call them his children in Bashir's documentary, unless they forced him to say those words as well. And if that's the case, what can we really believe or not believe from ANY of his interviews then? I personally don't think there were 3 Michaels in the Bashir interview. I listened to his voice, diction, pronunciation of words and looked at his facial features, profile, etc. and I think it's all Michael. The interview was taped over an 8 month period. His face looked a little fuller at times but he still sounded the same. And that's just my opinion.

    You said you were ticked that I said you were referring only to skin color. I did not accuse you of saying you were only going by skin color, I did say kids have different features (nose, lips, etc.) You say you can see the African American in my kids. People have asked them, to their faces, "what are you" (I know, people can be so crass) because they look like they can be Indian, Mexican, Hispanic or probably any of a dozen nationalities and people are truly dumbfounded when they tell them they are African American and Caucasian...they just don't see it; so I stand by THAT statement as well. I can see some African American features in Prince. That's my opinion. You do not see any. That's your opinion. We can agree to disagree and we don't have to argue to change the other's mind, because frankly I don't want to change your mind as I hope you don't want to change mine. That's the beauty of discourse, people share their opinions. We are each able to embrace another's opinion or discard it.

    I know you didn't just start researching this man, but neither did I. I've listened to this man sing, talk, I've watched interviews, looked at pictures almost every day for the past almost 3 years. I know you've delved deeply into aspects of his life and what he went through and I haven't. But when it comes to the end of the day neither one of us is privy to the inner workings of Michael's mind. We can each interpret his songs differently and I think that's the beauty of listening to music, because unless he came right out and said out of his mouth that "this is what I meant when I wrote this song" no one can possibly say, hands down, point blank, this is what he meant and he couldn't have possibly meant anything else. If we make that statement, I think we're fooling ourselves.

    I do get a lot out of your blog. It sometimes confirms things that I had been thinking and sometimes opens my mind to other possibilities and other times I think you're a little misguided...please do not take offense....this is my opinion :-). Again that's the beauty of opinions...we can choose to embrace what we agree with and discard or disregard what we do not. I just hope we can agree to disagree about certain things and still be friends.

    Deb

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Okay . . . we'll agree to disagree. And on the me "being ticked", it wasn't so much what you said about skin color but the statement to "not to go by their skin color or features and make bold statements", which pretty much tells me not to make any statements about what I believe is the case based on Michael's face during posing with Rowe and his newborn or Rowe WITH HIS CHILD (in the picture above) and the fact that despite Michael not even being able to get out anywhere without a photog on his butt, not one single solitary, not even an attempted FAKE picture of Michael being caught leaving or entering a hospital for any of these doctors appointments, any of these deliveries, any of these artificial insemination places . . . not one. Not one single picture or tabloid story saying " we suspect this was Michael coming out of such and such clinic, or "Michael was caught taking Debbie to the E.R." . . . none of it exists. Just babies popped out of Nowhere and Debbie Rowe appears PREGNANT on a Magazine with a shocked to hell Michael and a sudden story that Debbie "Offered" to have babies for him. None of this story existed before that freaked out looking Michael on that mag.

      Why?

      Delete
    2. Also on Klein . . . Yes Prince does have his mouth. Try to forget that Klien sports a pathetic mustache and the fact that he's fifty years older than Prince and doesn't have the youth "pout" anymore. The hair color is even the same. I'm sorry if this shatters your rose colored glasses, but if you are going to accuse me of being "misguided" then by ALL MEANS please be a bit more specific. Slapping blanket statements around is not a really effective way to debate.

      Delete
  25. Interesting article Bonnie. Wow, Prince does look a lot like Prince. I always knew Prince favored Arnold Klein, but now I can really see the resemblance. And Paris looks a lot like Debbie Rowe.

    Bonnie you believe MJ never had sex with Lisa or Debbie. I always knew MJ never had sex with Debbie, but I thought he had sex with Lisa. Lisa said during an interview with Diane Sawyer, in 1995, that she had sex with MJ,and told a close friend of her's, that MJ was hot in bed. MJ too said that he and Lisa were trying for a baby, meaning they had sex. MJ said he was getting impatient, and really wanted a baby.

    During the Diane Sawyer interview, MJ was asked by Diane if MJ were going to adopt Lisa Marie's children, and out of the blue, MJ says----"But children of all races, Arab children, Jewish children, Black children, it's all races". Why do you think MJ said that when he was only asked if he were going to adopt Lisa children?

    And notice MJ mentions the races, Arabian, Jewish, and Black, which are the most hated races by racist, wow. Do you think he meant something by that?

    And little did we know, MJ had Jewish children. Do you think Debbie Rowe may have saw this interview, and it gave her an idea to provide MJ with Jewish children?

    And why was MJ so fascinated in having children with Lisa Marie?When MJ and Lisa were engaged, MJ made Lisa promise him to give him children. Usually when you are married, children automatically come. It seems that the whole marriage to Lisa was in the hope of having Lisa children. So why was MJ so fascinated with having Lisa's children?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Starla,

      For the record, I don't believe Lisa Marie could tell the truth about Michael to save her own life. She had a chance to do that and blew it. Lisa Marie was only put with Michael to try to get him into Scientology. She was a bridge between handlers (Uri Geller is Larry Geller's cousin. Larry Geller was Elvis' handler).

      Nothing with those two ladies being put with Michael had anything to do with Michael's wishes. None. The whole story about Lisa and Debbie was nothing but stories the press/tabloids created to hide what they were doing to Michael and BOTH those ladies are responsible for Michael's pain. It was Michael that left that marriage when he got a chance and Lisa Marie acted like the spoiled, narcissistic child that she is, because someone took her prized possession away and that is all Michael was to her - a tool for attention.

      Delete
  26. What about MJ being so fascinated in having children with Lisa Marie? When MJ and Lisa were engaged, MJ made Lisa promise him to give him children. Usually when you are married, children automatically come. It seems that the whole marriage to Lisa was in the hope of having Lisa's children. So why was MJ so fascinated with having Lisa's children?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Starla, can you find me ONE T.V. interview where Michael said "I'm fascinated with having Lisa Marie's children"? This is all fan-fantasy talk. Lisa Marie did not love Michael. She is an MK Ultra child who's job was to control Michael and get him into Scientology so THEY could get him under control. She failed. Now she's out there lying with the rest of them.



      Delete
    2. Starla,

      Do you even CARE what happened to Michael? Because your questions are very superficial. We're talking about the torture of Michael here. All you want to talk about is Michael and sex, sex and Michael. You can go somewhere else if you want sexual fantasy talk. I've answered this same frigging question twice now. Do yourself a favor and get a brain cell.

      Delete
  27. Yes, I can find ONE interview, not a T.V. interview, but a voice recorded interview of MJ and Rabbi Shmuley, where MJ said that he wanted Lisa's children, but Lisa did not want to give him any, and that hurt him, because Lisa promised to give him children when they were engaged. MJ really wanted Lisa's children. MJ said so himself during the Rabbi Shmuley tapes, go listen for yourself. This is not fantasy. And I wanted to know why he wanted her children so badly.

    Also, during the 2005 Oprah interview, both Lisa and her mother Priscilla said that the whole purpose of marrying MJ was so that he could have Elvis's grandchildren.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So in other words you CAN'T find a televised interview where Michael said he wanted Lisa's children. Thank you.

      Rabbi Schmuley - if you trust him you don't care much for Michael and what that man put Michael through. Same goes for Lisa Marie and that lying devil, Druscilla.

      Michael did not want Lisa's children. The REAL Michael did not even want Lisa, other than to help her get out of that Scientology outfit. Why don't you try listening to Michael's SONGS instead of those who raped Michael financially and were paid to embarrass him. Lisa Marie loves HERSELF. Period. She knows no other human being. I did several blogs on what Lisa Marie, her possessed mother and Schmuley and Geller did to Michael.

      I know it's hard to sift through all the handlers that surrounded Michael, it took me three years to do it. NOBODY got close to Michael unless they had Sony and John Branca's okay and if they had Sony and Branca's okay, then believe me they were NO FRIENDS of Michael.

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.