Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Nimrod - It was BLACK Thing . . .

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Nimrod - It was BLACK Thing . . .

Angels and Demons

"Quenched the violence of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, out of weakness were made strong, waxed valiant in fight, turned to flight the armies of the aliens."

The video below is over an hour long.  I watched that one and the one I will post below that.

I know that some of this is going to be far-fetched and quite frankly I have a hard time wrapping my mind around this myself.  But there is some validity to SOME of what they are saying.

We know that our own CIA (as well as MI5, MI6, Mossad, Hitler’s 5th Reicht and Russian intelligence) all studied and researched mind control.

We know that MICHAEL knew SOMETHING about this.  He talked about the power of the mind, he drew PICTURES of it, and he put it into practice.

Michael Drawing – Power of Thought

Michael Advice for Dreamers

Jermaine said the Government didn’t
Want him around any more, he was too powerful (1:25)
0:30 – “before the trial, this was all planned”
3:25 “his kindness became a threat”

All this is a testament to not only what Michael knew, but how much of a THREAT he was because of what he disciplined himself to get back under his control.

When you watch this video below, don’t look at it closed minded.  Look at it as a story with embedded information.  A re-enactment made to look real, but to sound like a hoax, lies and schemes with TRUTH buried in it.  The Illuminati like to do that all the time.

I have timed certain points so that if you are pressed for time, you can skip to those points in the video.  The first 15 minutes or so is mostly a narrator giving you background on area 51 and Nellis AFB.

Start at 16:49

19:00 – They describe these beings as being able to communicate through thought.  This is not impossible.  When I dreamed of Christ when I was a teenager, before I had any concept or thoughts of this being possible, we spoke to each other through thought.  I heard what he said in my mind and he could hear my thoughts.  The same thing with my dream of God.  The same with Michael’s “Power of thought”. The same with the experiments reportedly done to materialize thought into solid objects. 

(10 part series I posted last year).
Will will cover the projects he mentions
In depth at a later time.

Back to the UFO video:

21:40 – President Ronald Reagan’s September 21, 1987 speech to the U.N. General Assembly is covered where Reagan.  Here President Reagan said, “In our obsessions with antagonisms of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity.  Perhaps we need some outside universal threat to make us recognize this common bond?.

(Enter movies like “Close Encounters of a Third Kind” and “Independence Day” and “Men in Black”.)    Reagan continues, “I occasionally think how quickly our differences world wide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world”.  (The build up to the Strong Delusion did not start with Reagan.  He was only the beginning of spoon feeding the public information.)

25:50 – Someone under disguise is interviewed about what he’s seen at area 51.  He is borderline hostile witness and threatened to terminate the interview several times because of questions out of bounds (personal protection).  He discusses that he had seen the “being” that was interviewed on a tape he supplied but he was not at that particular interview on the tape.  Interesting he mentioned infighting amongst scientists on who gets to ask it questions and what they ask him.  He says the “being” becomes unresponsive if they try to interview him more frequently or for too long so this is done only a couple of times a month.  “Being” has been here since 1989.

27:49 – Interviewee says “Oddly enough the ‘being’ seems to have a much easier time communicating spiritual concepts.

29:00 – Interestingly in the recreation the ‘being’ communicates that the human body is a vessel in which the spirit is housed and that the vessel must be maintained in order to serve the spirit to function at its most efficient.  “A broken vessel can be replaced.  It also was communicated that the spirit can be placed in another vessel.  If we go to the Bible, this is expressed by Jesus when he tells the disciples that Elias had already come to them:

"And as they came down from the mountain, Jesus charged them, saying, Tell the vision to no man, until the Son of man be risen again from the dead.  [10] And his disciples asked him, saying, Why then say the scribes that Elias must first come?  [11] And Jesus answered and said unto them, Elias truly shall first come, and restore all things.  [12] But I say unto you, That Elias is come already, and they knew him not, but have done unto him whatsoever they listed. Likewise shall also the Son of man suffer of them.  [13] Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist."

Jesus did not want the disciples disclosing the vision of his transformation until he rose from the dead.  Also when Jesus arose from the dead he was not recognized physically by those who had traveled and taught with them for three years, his own disciples, because he appeared in more than one form.  Jesus explained to his pupils that the prophecy that the Pharisees spoke of, that Elias would return, had already happened, in John the Baptist and the Pharisees did not recognize it.

"And they, when they had heard that he was alive, and had been seen of her, believed not.  [12] After that he appeared in another form unto two of them, as they walked, and went into the country.  [13]  And they went and told it unto the residue: neither believed they them."

Jesus appeared to Mary in one form, and to the disciples in another form.  And in Luke 24:

"And, behold, two of them went that same day to a village called Emmaus, which was from Jerusalem about threescore furlongs.  [14] And they talked together of all these things which had happened.  [15] And it came to pass, that, while they communed together and reasoned, Jesus himself drew near, and went with them.  [16] But their eyes were holden that they should not know him . . .

[29] But they constrained him, saying, Abide with us: for it is toward evening, and the day is far spent. And he went in to tarry with them.  [30] And it came to pass, as he sat at meat with them, he took bread, and blessed it, and brake, and gave to them.  [31] And their eyes were opened, and they knew him; and he vanished out of their sight."

Jesus appeared in spirit form and inhabiting “vessels” or other human beings.  It seems to me that if demons can inhabit a body upon being given an opening, then so can do the spirits that God sends.  In discussion concerning this “interview”, the concept of the “vessel” needing to be healthy for the spirit within it to function at it’s highest efficiency, you can see why it is so important to the usurpers to malnourish us through chemical, genetic and biological depletion of nutrients from our food, and poisoning our water – SORCERY.

Now lets move on with the video:

30:00 – Interesting, the interviewee makes it a point to explain that a ‘being’ that is so far removed from us technologically or spiritually, that these ‘beings’ don’t necessarily have our bests interests in mind. 

This aligns with the “War in Heaven”.  These ‘beings’, whatever it is our governments are harboring secretly, are only looking for “vessels”.  They sought to take possession of God’s creation back when he created it. They coveted . . . the ghost of jealousy.  Here I believe we are listening to a good explanation of  the difference between the “mark of the beast” in the forehead, and the “seal of God” in the forehead.

War in Heaven

Our “elite” are promised they will be “gods” or be “like God” – the same lie as the serpent gave Eve in the garden of Eden.

I am thinking of Michael again, what “power” Jermaine talked about, and why those in our government and so many other participating industries considered Michael a threat.  To continue . . .

At 45:00 - or so minutes we hear opinions from experts from Hollywood film making and prosthesis creation to UFO experts on whether the film is genuine, untouched, contains special lighting effects or holographics.

54:50, “Victor” the identity-protected interviewee is featured on Art Bell’s program.  Art Bell has been exposed as being CIA.  This tells me one of two things is going on with this “release” of information.

Either it is a hoax to instill plausible doubt and to overwhelm with confusion or . . .

It is a hoax to falsely identify these “aliens” as aliens instead of what they REALLY are.


Aliens really Demons/Fallen Angels

This film is just as controversial, because there is also truth mixed with deception in this.  It opens with the Art Bell radio program I featured here last year, of a man who claims to have worked at area 51 calling in to tell Art Bell that these aliens are not extra terrestrials they are “inter-dimensional beings”, and that the government “knows the disasters that are coming”.

Into 2:50 minutes or so, the narrator explains that the “beings” whatever they are, have been deceiving mankind “since they got here”.  Then he mentions that “Christ” would have been one of these individuals in a human disguise.  I see this going to the “both sides have been deceiving us” claim that we are also warned about in the Bible.  At 3 minutes, he goes into the use of “mind control” to make people believe they were abducted or on a spaceship when they may have been in a military facility here, or underground, being experimented on.

Have you seen my childhood?  I’m searching for the world that I come from . . .” – Michael Jackson, Childhood.

7:00 minutes he clarifies his opening by stating that we don’t see evidence of intergalactic beings coming to and from earth.  We only see them or evidence of them on films when they are already here.  I.E. we get to see a light show in the sky or between satellites above the earth.  But no evidence of them traveling or traffic coming from elsewhere in the solar system to us.

15:50 – He explains that fallen angels have the ability to “transform”. 

17:10 – Where we use resources to form objects, fallen angels have the power to transform themselves into different objects (power of thought?).  Ezekiel describes the creatures who’s wheels move when the creature moves and that the spirit of the creature was in the wheels.  Ezekiel 1:20

18:00 – 19:00 minutes – He talks about their abilities not being as powerful (doesn’t clarify comparison) and that there is a weakness in them in our dimension.

20:00 – Talks about the creativity of the fallen angels and their deception and ability to deceive.  They like to be identified as aliens, then he begins to get into the Nephalim, which are the children of fallen angels.

21:22 – Book of Enoch is mentioned, and it’s discussion of the children of the fallen angels.  Enoch saw these beings coming from another world (through portal, he says), their universe is BEHIND our universe.

22:16 – Discusses the rulers, our government leaders making deals with these things (they are lied to, told they are aliens or told they are gods), which matches what “Victor” in the first video said from the alien point of view – That they “don’t necessarily have our best interests in mind”.

26:00 – Says what happened in Enoch’s time is going to happen again, Revelation tells of it happening.  Also a picture is shown of Hitler shaking hands with a Nephalim (real or not, it was never published in a local paper, so where did it come from and why the secrecy?)

27:00 – 31:00+ - He shows both pictures and diagrams of some of the craft that developed or confiscated and studied during WWII.  It is interesting to note that some of these engineering drawings resemble Tesla’s diagrams of flying craft NOT airplaines.

32:40 - 33:44 – He discusses something else familiar with “Victor”’s description of the craft – that there are three levels of compartments.  Then there is allegedly a “Nazi base” on the moon.  (Press reportedly made fun of Michael saying he wanted to be the first to travel to the moon, he even paid a deposit.  True?  Who knows…).

35:45 -  He discusses trips to the moon and a city built there by the Rothschilds, the visible evidence of light sources/fallen angels appearing there.  However, there is also controversy that there WAS NO ACTUAL LANDING on the moon.  There is pictorial evidence we covered of that last year so who to believe?  If these creatures are interdimensional beings, why would they need to help the leaders here set up cities on the moon?

I will stop at 35.45 minutes on this vide and cover the rest another time (I’m tired.)   But before I close I wanted to show you something.

I had for some reason began looking into Nimrod again, as he was mentioned in some of the sources, I was looking through for the topic of “Mystery Babylon”.  What I found was very interesting.

Mystery Babylon

Going back the Old Testament of the Bible and namely the founding of Babylon, which is assigned to Nimrod, there seems to be a lot of misinformation about this man and I still was not satisfied as to why.  This was a controversy last year for which I found no supporting evidence that Nimrod was responsible for the Tower of Babel. – Source,

In researching more on this, I tried to find whether Nimrod was mentioned in Apocryphal books not included in the English Version of the Bible, since Nimrod is so anemically mentioned.

I found one source that claims that Nimrod’s wife was Semiramis, who was considered the “Queen” of Babylon.  But there is nothing Biblically supporting this either.  This same source ascribed and very succinctly explained the error of giving the Roman Catholic church the “honor” of the title of “Babylon” and where that error came from.  However, they lost me when they began discussing Nimrod. – Source,

I did a search on the Bible Gateway for the name Semiramis and it does not appear at all in the King James Version, or three other English versions of the Bible.  I checked the Aramaic translation of her name, Shammuramat, and that did not appear in the Bible either.

As a matter of fact, searching Wikipedia put this character as a “mythical” figure who’s rein would have been between 809 B.C. to 792 B.C. – WELL after the period of Nimrod and the founding of Babylon.  She most CERTAINLY could not have been his wife. – Source,  They may have gotten this from pairing one of the cities in which a monument inscription to her exists in the ancient Assyrian city called Calah (in what is now Iraq), or what the Arabs called “Nimrud”, which was named after Nimrod. but this does not make her Nimrod’s wife, nor does it connect her to Nimrod in any way.

Nimrod lived long before this Semiramis, which looks to be the very same one who is assigned to the starting of “polytheism”.  Where are these people getting Biblical support for a union between Nimrod and Semiramis?

In this source, Nimrod is described as a warrior, not a hunter as it states in the Bible.  They go into detail about the “seven cities” in which Nimrod started. That much IS mentioned in the Bible.  The source states:

"It was in Mesopotamia that the first cities were built after the flood, and the first of these was quite naturally named after the very first city built by man before the flood---Enoch. Due to vagaries of linguistic permutation, this name has come down to us as Erech or Uruk in Sumeria. In all there were seven major cities built near the head of the Persian Gulf, leading to the name "Land of the Seven Cities" commonly found in the early mythologies of the world. These seven cities are enumerated in Genesis as those which were conquered by Nimrod, establishing the world's first empire." – Source,

These are the verses discussing Nimrod in the Bible.

"And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth.  [9] He was a mighty hunter before the Lord: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the Lord.  [10] And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shinar.

[11] Out of that land went forth Asshur, and builded Nineveh, and the city Rehoboth, and Calah,  [12] And Resen between Nineveh and Calah: the same is a great city."

This assigns the building of Nineveh, Rehoboth, Calah and Resen to Asshur, who is one of Shem’s sons, NOT Ham’s.  This is described in Genesis 10:22.  Nimrod BIBLICALLY only has credit for beginning his kingdom with Babel, Erech, Accad and Calneh.  That is four cities, not seven.

1 Chronicles 1:10 repeats this – “And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be mighty upon the earth."  Again, this doesn’t elicit that this is a negative thing.

Nimrod is only mentioned 4 times in the Bible, the last being in the book of Micah 5:6-8 which ironically prophesizes the remnant of Jacob being scattered amongst the Gentiles and “many peoples”.

"And they shall waste the land of Assyria with the sword, and the land of Nimrod in the entrances thereof: thus shall he deliver us from the Assyrian, when he cometh into our land, and when he treadeth within our borders.

7 And the remnant of Jacob shall be in the midst of many people as a dew from the Lord, as the showers upon the grass, that tarrieth not for man, nor waiteth for the sons of men.

8 And the remnant of Jacob shall be among the Gentiles in the midst of many people as a lion among the beasts of the forest, as a young lion among the flocks of sheep: who, if he go through, both treadeth down, and teareth in pieces, and none can deliver."

We know bad stuff happened at Babylon.  We know their language was “confused” because of their pride and rebellion against God.  But where in the Bible does it say anything about Nimrod causing this?

Even Wikipedia lends the story of Nimrod as the builder of the tower an "Extra-Biblical account".  It is not Biblical.

"He is depicted in the Tanakh as a man of power in the earth, and a mighty hunter. Extra-Biblical traditions associating him with the Tower of Babel led to his reputation as a king who was rebellious against God." – Source -

Remember what Jesus said about the “traditions of men”?  Wouldn’t that be “extra-Biblical” traditions?

And according to Wikipedia, it is unclear even in the Hebrew text who is assigned to building the other cities of Assyria.

"Genesis says that the "beginning of his kingdom" (reshit memelketo) was the towns of "Babel, Uruk, Akkad and Calneh in the land of Shinar" (Mesopotamia) — understood variously to imply that he either founded these cities, ruled over them, or both. Owing to an ambiguity in the original Hebrew text, it is unclear whether it is he or Asshur who additionally built Nineveh, Resen, Rehoboth-Ir and Calah." – Source,

Was Nimrod a Victim of Color Discrimination by Jewish Pharisees?

Here is where the ambiguity ends.  Since modern day Christianity has been prefixed with the “Judeo-Christian” label, it is no wonder that the assignment of Babel to Nimrod is made originally in the Talmud NOT in the actual Holy Scriptures:

"In Hebrew and Christian tradition, Nimrod is traditionally considered the leader of those who built the Tower of Babel in the land of Shinar,[4] though the Bible never actually states this. Nimrod's kingdom included the cities of Babel, Erech, Accad, and Calneh, all in Shinar. (Ge 10:10) Therefore it was likely under his direction that the building of Babel and its tower began; in addition to Flavius Josephus, this is also the view found in the Talmud (Chullin 89a, Pesahim 94b, Erubin 53a, Avodah Zarah 53b), and later midrash such as Genesis Rabba. Several of these early Judaic sources also assert that the king Amraphel, who wars with Abraham later in Genesis, is none other than Nimrod himself." – Source,

Flavius Josephus was a Jewish Roman "Historian" (a re-writer of history).  The two most popular sources of this association of Nimrod is Josephus and the Talmud.


Now this answers EVERYTHING (almost everything.  This is after all, Wikipedia).   In reading the below (and passages in the Midrash).  We covered last year the sons of Noah after the flood, repopulating the earth.  Noah’s sons and their wives, the wives of Ham, Shem and Japheth and where their descendents settled, I covered here -  “Michael Jackson and Nimrod – Case of Mistaken Identity

On that blog I gave a background of the origins of the Hamitic, Semitic and Japhethtic tribes:

Shem = Semitic The word "Semitic" is an adjective derived from Shem, one of the three sons of Noah in the Bible  The term Semite means a member of any of various ancient and modern Semitic-speaking peoples originating in southwestern Asia, including; Akkadians (Assyrians andBabylonians), Eblaites, Ugarites, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Hebrews(Israelites, Judeans and Samaritans), Arameans, Chaldeans, Amorites,Moabites, Edomites, Hyksos, Arabs, Nabateans, Maganites, Shebans, Sutu,Maltese, Mandeans and Ethiopian Semites.”

Now wait until you see this:

Ham = Hamitic: “The term Hamitic originally referred to the peoples believed to have been descended from the biblical Ham, one of the Sons of Noah. When Ham dishonors his father, Noah pronounces a curse on him,stating that the descendents of his son Canaan will be "servants of servants". Of Ham's four sons, Canaan fathered the Canaanites, while Mizraim fathered the Egyptians, Cush the Cushites, and Phut the Libyans

Further on this page it states:  During the Middle Ages, this was interpreted to define Ham as the ancestor of all Africans. The curse was regularly interpreted as having created visible racial characteristics in Ham's offspring, notably black skin. According to Edith Sanders, the sixth-century Babylonian Talmud states that "the descendants of Ham are cursed by being Black and depicts Ham as a sinful man and his progeny as degenerates."[2] Both Arab and later European and American slave traders used this story to justify African slavery.”

The hatred towards blacks and the negativity this generated toward skin color began as far back as the Talmud and the Mishnah.  (Michael Jackson’s “Morphine”, “you hate your race, baby . . .”)  Further in Wikipedia it says:

"Some rabbinic commentators have also connected the name Nimrod with a Hebrew word meaning 'rebel'. In Pseudo-Philo (dated ca. AD 70), Nimrod is made leader of the Hamites; while Joktan as leader of the Semites, and Fenech as leader of the Japhethites, are also associated with the building of the Tower . . . The Book of Jubilees mentions the name of "Nebrod" (the Greek form of Nimrod) only as being the father of Azurad, the wife of Eber and mother of Peleg (8:7). This account would thus make him an ancestor of Abraham, and hence of all Hebrews." – Source,

So “Babel and Babylon” was assigned to Nimrod because he was Hamitic?  Black?  Dark skinned?  In most depictions of Babylon like this one,  Nimrod is not even mentioned as a King of Babylon, even in Ancient Babylon!    As a matter of fact, all the Bible says of him was that he was a “great hunter before the Lord”.   Nimrod is described as “great”.  Was Goliath described as “Great”?  No.  Was Baal described as “mighty”?  No.  Where did the word “great” get so twisted and given a contradictory meaning?

If you recall in Genesis 9, God told Noah that they were to eat of the animals because there was no vegetation after the flood.  And God told them that he would make the animals fear and dread them.

This would make Noah’s sons and grandsons the first hunters, and Nimrod became a “mighty hunter before the Lord”.   How this was translated into “rebellious against God” is beyond me.  I read it as physically superior.

Then hundreds of years later they name their “Talmud” the “Babylonian Talmud” after a city founded by Nimrod who is blamed for building “Babel” and rebelling against God when THEY are the ones that have been doing so?  I see the irony in this but the truth?  I think we found our stone thrower (one of them).

Nimrod is the son of Cush, grandson of Ham.  This is why the “Curse of Canaan” was misappropriated by the Talmud Jews to ALL of Ham’s sons when Noah cursed ONLY the sons of Canaan.  Another lie to further smear dark skinned people.  But why were they so hated by the Jews?  Did this deception begin with Ham and Nimrod, or was this re-write of history done later . . . after Christ?

The people who claim to be Jews today are mainly from the land of “Gog and Magog”.  Russian and Bavarian converts who relocated to Palestine.  These are the descendents of Japheth.  Where is the enmity between the two and how did it originate?  What did the Hamites do to make the Jews hate them so much?

All throughout history, from the more recent story of AIDS originating from Native “Africans who had sex with monkeys”, black people have been falsely accused.  Convenient scapegoats.  They are FALL GUYS for the real perpetrators.  As far back as the misinformation about the “Curse of Ham” and the false witness against Nimrod, they’ve been victimized.

The modern day practitioners of “Judaism” don’t like GENUINE Semitics either, the Arabs and real Israelites.  They’ll just accuse THEM of being anti-Semitic as if they themselves are when they are not.  The angel calls them out to John in Revelation 2:9 and 3:8-9.

What was Madonna’s song “Like a Prayer” really about?  She’s a white woman, a harlot who witnesses the murder of a woman.  She watches and DOES NOTHING as a black man who comes to the woman’s rescue gets accused of and punished for a crime he did not commit.  She instead preoccupies herself with the seduction of the same “black Jesus” who comes to live behind steel bars in a church.

The age old condemnation of the innocent to pay for the crimes of the guilty.

Their Plans With Michael

Michael gave an interview to Rock and Soul back when he was filming “The Whiz”.  I found a few of his statements rather odd for someone who was just getting started in the second stage of his career.  Michael was “afraid” to fulfill his potential?

Did he know a lot more about his role in history then even we thought THAT FAR BACK?

It’s not like I don’t talk at all.I’m a prisoner of myself.I’m afraid to fulfill my potential,just like the character I play in The Wiz.I come alive when I’m onstage or in the studio or doing a film.I’m confident and aggressive- but that’s not hard for me.Onstage I’m playing a role: I know what’s expected of me and what I have to do.  It’s all very well planned.  Life isn’t well planned: it’s unpredictable.  It scares me! It’s so much harder than being on stage.  One time Q asked me to come to a party at his Bel Air home.  I drove up and saw all these cars parked outside his driveway and the next thing I knew I was driving off.  Just too many people to deal with.  That’s me! What can I do?  All I owe the public is a good show, good music and the very best of my talent.  Goodness knows, they’ve got that and always will get it!”** Michael Jackson - Rock and Soul

We will get back to the video on the fallen angels.  Tomorrow is Jesus’s day.  :o)

God bless you, and please keep your prayers in your heart open for the Jackson family, regardless of what is real and what is not.  God knows.

Grasping – God knows when this is all going to go down.  We don’t.  Not up to the minute, but we see the signs.  I think the next blog update is needed.

Lost Children

Michael’s true purpose was not their agenda, and they know it.  That is why you see the trouble you are seeing right now.  It is foretold.

The truth is coming to light.



  1. Well, I don't know about the
    Rothschilds and the moon but Michael has land on the moon.....I remember reading it a long time ago and I had a little chuckle over it. And it reminded me of this lovely song by Berry's relative.


    1. Geeze, I haven't seen that video in a long time (three years or a little less). I wasn't impressed with the impersonator though. And no, I'm not sold on the Rothschild's moon either. Every one of these videos has some little thing stuck in there to contradict other information. They can't just leave it at Biblical truth. They have to MESS with it.

      I'm not even convinced man EVER made it to the moon. Did you ever see some of those pictures?

  2. SAdly Bonnie, not everyone believes in biblical truth so there's the very biggest problem to start with.

    I didn't like the impersonator in that vid either but I don't like any impersonators at the best of times. I thought the little girl was like Janet as a young child,,,very sweet.

    I have seen lots of pics of the moon landing and all the rest of it. I've read lots from Neil Armstrong, Buzz etc and watched the vids from the year before last or the year before that.. (I think, time has gone haywire since all this MJ stuff began)when the astronauts from that moonlanding were honoured by Obama. I really can't say one way or the other what they did at the time re the landing. I actually thought they landed on the moon. I hope they didn't lie to the world.


    1. TL,

      There is going to come a time when it is too late to consider the Bible. The good thing about all this "bad stuff" going on and the blatant disregard for decency and truth (especially in the news, today's modern "devotionals") have more and more people turning toward the Bible as they realize everything they THOUGHT was truth or a source OF IT, is deception.

      I can't tell you how many people have emailed me or even just posted on these comments about getting Bibles or asking their parents if they can borrow their Bibles. The interest in that has definitely peaked. You can check out these videos and they can have very good information, TRUTHFUL information, but they have lies twisted around it, or they've tried to fit the Bible to the lies.

      Common sense. Back then people like us didn't know as much as we know today about photograph anomalies. Today NASA pictures of the moon landings are alot like looking at the difference between the film "Star Wars" technology and "Star Trek" the original series. I.E. they were really bad at touchups.

  3. Well, I will say we all remember it as a bit of a space race at the time with the US and the Russians as I recall so you never know....that is sometimes enough to urge people to tell a tall story. Just to be 'first'. As I say, I truly hope they did not Lie to the People. If they did, it will eventually come back to bite them in the butt.


  4. I hope they wouldn't lie to us, I'm so sick of the lying. And the news I just can't stand to watch anymore.....(sigh)


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.