Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Jackson Family Drama Brought to You By - Branca & Company

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Jackson Family Drama Brought to You By - Branca & Company

What Did Geraldo Prove On Jackson Interview?
Branca Losing Control of P.R.?



And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure.  [8] For this thing I besought the Lord thrice, that it might depart from me.

9 And he said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me."



With such collusions
Don’t it make you wanna scream?


Lots of info this time too, sorry!  But I wanted to cover Revelation 19, more current events and the Geraldo interview with Tanay Jackson.

Our last Revelation coverage we went through Revelation 18 and covered in more detail a couple of the verses last night.  Revelation 18 again identifies Babylon with Jerusalem.  The last four verses of Chapter 18 are below:


"And a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying, Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all.  [22] And the voice of harpers, and musicians, and of pipers, and trumpeters, shall be heard no more at all in thee; and no craftsman, of whatsoever craft he be, shall be found any more in thee; and the sound of a millstone shall be heard no more at all in thee;

[23] And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.  [24] And in her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth."


In Revelation 19, we get to John witnessing Heaven exalting over Babylon, preparations for the marriage of the Lamb, Christ on the white horse and the beast and his armies being defeated.  This of course happens after the plagues and after the gathering up of God’s people (the rescue from Babylon’s plagues).

Here we will also see something very interesting regarding the archangel Michael and Christ.


"And after these things I heard a great voice of much people in heaven, saying, Alleluia; Salvation, and glory, and honour, and power, unto the Lord our God:  [2] For true and righteous are his judgments: for he hath judged the great whore, which did corrupt the earth with her fornication, and hath avenged the blood of his servants at her hand.  [3] And again they said, Alleluia And her smoke rose up for ever and ever.

[This confirms into the vision that “the great whore” is the same in who the blood of God’s servants is found.  Jerusalem.]

[4] And the four and twenty elders and the four beasts fell down and worshipped God that sat on the throne, saying, Amen; Alleluia.  [5] And a voice came out of the throne, saying, Praise our God, all ye his servants, and ye that fear him, both small and great.  [6] And I heard as it were the voice of a great multitude, and as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of mighty thunderings, saying, Alleluia: for the Lord God omnipotent reigneth.


[I am still trying to figure out who the four beasts represent.  Different and separate from the beast with the seven heads who comes out of the sea, these worship God with the 24 elders.  Here also the “great multitude” is likened to the voice of “many waters”. And the whore is described as “sitting on many waters” in Jeremiah, and earlier in Revelation “many waters” refers to many nations.  Here John witnesses creation praising God at the judgment of Babylon.]

[7] Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready.  [8] And to her was granted that she should be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white: for the fine linen is the righteousness of saints.  [9] And he saith unto me, Write, Blessed are they which are called unto the marriage supper of the Lamb. And he saith unto me, These are the true sayings of God.


[Here the marriage of the Lamb (Church-bride and Christ-bridegroom, Matt. 9.  The marriage supper of the Lamb is the celebration in which God’s people are reconciled through Christ and all things are made new.  All prophecies fulfilled, all promises made profitable for those who persevered with God and with Christ.]


[10] And I fell at his feet to worship him. And he said unto me, See thou do it not: I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus: worship God: for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.  [11]  And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.


[Here John is scolded by the angel for bowing down to him, and reminds John that angels are servants just like himself.  He tells him “worship God”.  Then John sees the He who rides on the white horse as shown us in Rev. 6.  And from the description of “Faithful and True” we know this is Christ in verse 12 below.]


[12] His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself.  [13] And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.


[This same “Faithful and True” on the white horse wore many crowns, and he had a name that no man knew but he himself.  In Revelation 2 we learn that we will be given a new name (written in a white stone).  In Rev. 14, we learn that the 144,000 have this name written in their foreheads and they will sing a song that only they know.  We also know his vesture is dipped in blood (and also has a name written on it), and that his name is called “The Word of God”.  Who was the Living Word?  Hebrews 4 tells us that the “Word of God” is sharper than any two edged sword, and is living and powerful and can discern the intent of the heart.  And in John 1:4 we are told that “The Word became flesh and dwelt among us” and we know that this is Jesus.]


[14] And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.  [15] And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.


[Here is where we have to pay attention.  The talk of the armies which were in heaven following him.  Again they describe the sword that goeth out of his mouth.  Jesus will be judging them with the Word of God (sharper than any two-edged sword, able to separate soul and spirit.  But what did we learn back in Revelation 12?  In Rev. 12:7 we learn it is Michael and his angels who fight the dragon and HIS angels, but here they are not cast into the lake of fire, they are cast into the earth.  Also, ironically Michael is also mentioned in DANIEL 12!  There, Michael is “taken up” as the angel tells Daniel of this prophecy.  And when that happens there is a time of trouble like never before. And at that time all shall be delivered after these things.  In Matthew 24, Jesus tells us to mind the prophecy in Daniel.  And in 2 Thes. 2 we are told by Paul that “he” will be revealed in his time, the one who will “letteth” until he is “taken out of the way”.  Both Matt. 24 and 2 Thes. again refers to Michael in Daniel 12.]


[16] And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, King Of Kings, And Lord Of Lords.  [17] And I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven, Come and gather yourselves together unto the supper of the great God;

[18] That ye may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all men, both free and bond, both small and great.  [19] And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army.


[Rev. 18 first talks about death of the flesh of Kings and might men of the earth, those who stand against Christ and his army.]


[20] And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.  [21] And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh."

The end of the corrupted  that worship the beast and his image.  The beast and his false prophet are cast into the lake of fire, and the remnant left were slain with the sword of him that sat on the horse, with the sword of the Word of God from his mouth.


There are three more chapters in Revelation, 20 – 22 that we will cover.

I have gone over and compared many things in the Bible to the things that are going on with Michael here in the past.  Because the last three chapters of Revelation are review mixed with prophecy, I want to start looking at some of Michael’s songs to determine what it is they wanted out of him.

We are either watching Biblical prophecy unfolding with Michael in the thick of it.  We are watching the mimicking of Biblical prophecy with them USING Michael to deceive (his name, his image, most fans worship his image and don’t even know it, it’s not the REAL Michael), or we have BOTH happening simultaneously.

It is said that we will not know the day or the hour, but we will know the times and the seasons.  We will see and recognize the signs – that is, the ones who are not hard-hearted and that “have eyes that see and ears that hear” . . . (oratory ears?)

We are trying to “hear” and we “can’t” because of all the noise the enemy is trying to make, which is why God gave us his word.  If we “reach for the truth” and don’t give up, it will be revealed to us.  And I write this as much for my own reminder as it is a help to you.  Because as YOU KNOW, I can get tied up in those details too.




Current Events


More from Pakalert Press.  You may not be interested in all of it (most if it is U.S.A. centered) but I will put the links up and a brief summary.
 
Obama's October Surprise: Bombing Iran

A devastating strike would create an upsurge of patriotism in America and fully
neutralize Mitt Romney's contention that Obama is a foreign-policy wimp. It
could allow Obama to sweep to victory in November.

Could this be Michael’s “October” date, if we misread the second clock on “This is It” rehearsals as a “year”?

I still have a very hard time with Obama.  As a matter of fact I don’t even recognize him as our president because his whole identity is a mirage.  He is the only president this country has ever had sit in the oval office that has had aliases.  He’s the only one who sports a social security number of a dead man and he is the only one who’s whole past is SEALED from the public, including college records . . . it’s unheard of.

Other than that, I don’t like his policies.  He is “Agenda 21” all the way.  He is sold out to the U.N. and Israel and Britain even though the Queen didn’t want to have anything to do with him (that was interesting).

Patrick Treacy once told me that Obama was going to change the world, LOL!  Yeah.  That’s not “Change you can believe in”, that’s “Change we can do without”.  I wonder how Patrick meant that.  :o)


Do these government records tell of Obama’s false flag event?

Recently, Tennessee state Rep. Kelly Keisling (R-Byrdstown) sent out an email
from his state email account to his constituents with a concern that Obama and the Department of Homeland Security are planning events leading to “martial law”.

Theories are only theories until facts allow them to be worked into being real.
Two such theories are of evolution and creation. Neither can be called factual
until one of them actually takes place.

Such is the animal known as “Conspiracy Theory”. Often whispered in the dark
over a few beers as the fire in the camp fire goes out, or screamed across the
airwaves over the fruited plains.


Crazy Details About The Bank That's Been Accused Of Transferring $250 Billion To Iran

U.K. investment bank Standard Chartered could be suspended from operating in New York after state finance regulators found hundreds of billions of dollars worth of transactions with Iran.

"Motivated by greed, SCB acted for at least ten years without any regard for the legal, reputational, and national security consequences of its flagrantly
deceptive actions," the New York Department of Financial Services says.


Heh!  They didn’t seem to take this strong of a stance against HSBC or Barclay’s or Bank of America or Goldman Sach’s! Whatupwitdat, New York?


The Beatles -- Illuminati Mind Controllers

In his book, The Committee of 300, former MI6 officer John Coleman reveals the Beatles were a psychological operation run by the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations.

The Beatles were created to advance the formation of a corrupted Brave New
World-style slave populace. This agenda kicked in big time during the 60s, with rock groups acting as social agitators.

Free love, drugs and rock music were promoted. To replace Christianity, the
Illuminati introduced the New Age Movement: spiritual doctrines that do not
require the individual to follow the Moral Law. (See this interview with John

The Beatles were presented as anti-establishment but received endless mainstream media attention. In 1965, they received MBEs (Members of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire) from the Queen.


I covered this last year.  Interestingly enough one of the songs discussed on that article is “Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds”, which they say refers to Lucifer in the sky.  I covered the Beatles last year, here on part 3, part 4, and part 5 of the series “Murder of the King of Pop”.

Kinda makes you wonder how a group as powerful as the Beatles were artistically programmed but we’re supposed to believe that Michael somehow escaped this kind of control?  Considering their plans for him, it is very easy to see why they went on the attack when he wanted to take control artistically.  Really makes you wonder.


Sikh Shooter a Former Psyop Soldier Linked to FBI’s National Alliance

The alleged shooter in the Wisconsin Sikh shooting is a former soldier who
worked in military psychological operations, according to the corporate media.

Sikh Shooter a Former Psyop Soldier Linked to FBIs National Alliance CBS News reports that Page enlisted in the Army in April 1992 and was given a
less-than-honorable discharge in October 1998. He was last stationed in Fort
Bragg, N.C., serving in the psychological operations unit.


This happened just a couple of days ago.  The same controversy surrounded the  “Dark Night” shooter.  All of them controlled, “false flag” operations – mini-terrorist events to try to shove more draconian legislation down our throats.  There are way too many connections to intelligence and military with these people.


Breaking: Monsanto Forced Out of UK by Activists

It has been a truly rough week for Monsanto. After being slammed with a lawsuit by concerned farmers over their GMO crops and thrown out by China, now the corrupt juggernaut is being thrown out of the United Kingdom. In an
unprecedented announcement, Monsanto announced a major departure from the UK due to “intense opposition” to genetically modified foods from activists.

I really hope this is true!  Of course Britain is the “New Jerusalem” so they may very well be the only country that the U.N. allows this to happen in regard to stopping GMO poisoning of its people.  (Oh, and Israel).



Michael’s Niece Shuts Down Geraldo


Before I start this, I want to congratulate Tanay for her poise in dealing with Geraldo.   I remember him back in his “Jerry Springer”-like talk show days and the chair throwing, un-reality T.V. interviews.  It is not often I see an interviewee who can take control of the interview from Geraldo like you did.  And I respectfully request that you give Diane Sawyer, Dimond, Nancy Graceless, Jane Valez Mitchell the same “lesson” in how to accept the “I’m not going to talk about that” barricade. :o)

I also want to commend Geraldo (and believe me this is NOT easy to say) for at the very least touching on ALL the information and getting both sides out there.  You could have restrained yourself from insinuating Michael’s brothers and sisters were doing this for control of the estate, but I can’t complain about the fact you did present both sides.

With that said, here is the video (three parts which starts after the last one ends).   Since Micheline is the one that grabbed this for me (I did not see it on T.V.) I wanted to publish her comment with the link:


Here's last night's show in three segment videos.  After the first segment ends, the next segment will play after a short delay.   When you watch the part between Geraldo and Tito's daughter, Tanay, it almost looks like Geraldo was "feeding" her the questions and she knew what they were going for.  An odd moment was when Geraldo asked Tanay if she was appearing on the show with the blessing of the Jackson family, and she paused and said, "yes I am appearing with the blessing of one relative. "  Geraldo asked if she would say which one and she nodded her head "no" and had a cagey expression, then said "I don't want to say who."  Hmm...isn't that strange...do you think it was Michael?


Or you can watch below:


Part 1



Geraldo opens this with Michael’s speech against Sony with Al Sharpton on July 7, 2002, the same day John Branca says Michael was in L.A. signing the will.  He quickly covers the letter leaked from the Jacksons, the rebuttal from the estate and he also shows the letter, which I have also published on my blog (its all over the internet) where Branca was fired in 2003 and never hired back.

They first interview a woman (Remember Model, Twiggy?  She’s a legal analyst now and a “music industry insider”)  who states that Branca and McClain would have motive to forge a will because of the incredible amounts of money to be made just earning off the percentages.  They don’t even go into the fact that John Branca has set himself up as CEO of Michael’s trademark company and also works for Sony, earning on all sides of the transactions.

This woman also makes it clear that the family members who produced this letter to the executors have no financial claim or motive to question the will’s authenticity as it does not change who the beneficiaries are.

Then they go into Branca et. al.’s rebuttal to the claims, but Branca et. al. never state or explain how Michael could be in L.A. and in New York at the same time.  He leaves that to his hired bloggers, who try to claim Michael signed it in New York even though the document states L.A. and apparently don’t know the law.

As Janet’s attorney stated, those who have the most to lose are the EXECUTORS AND THOSE ON THE EXECUTORS PAYROLL. 

That would be your bloggers Justice4some, Taaj Malik (we’ll get to her in a minute), truthvslies, VindicatingMJ, VindicatingMJ2.0 (the new Edwards and Ffrench blog), Qbees blog, Justice4MJ and MJ4Justice and all.  These are the ones who are getting Michael’s children’t money – NOT Michael’s brothers and sisters who have their OWN careers and their OWN businesses.

Vicki Roberts suggest that the only way the siblings would have possible access to Michael’s estate is if they try to get Miss Katherine declared incompetent.  But that STILL would not change the beneficiaries, nor would it even effect who executes the estate.  They would still have to battle the estate.  I have ANOTHER theory, but  I will wait and see before I throw it out there.

Now we get to the buffoon that Geraldo interviews about Miss Katherine being “snatched”.    Geraldo also brings up Dr. Metzger who allegedly “came to the house and said she had to go to this R&R” with Rebbie instead of with Trent Jackson who’s “head of her security” and her “Grand-nephew”.  (Since when is it a crime to go anywhere with your daughter?)

Is Craig Rivera related to Geraldo?  (just saw the last name)  He states Metzger testified FOR Dr. Murray.  However Metzger, if anyone remembers the trial, did not do Murray any favors.  He condemned his use of Propofol, and we learned that Metzger was the doctor that accompanied Michael on tours and took care of his “intravenous” needs.  This was backed up in Jermaine’s book when he discussed walking in on Michael in a hotel room while Michael went back on tour, to run into the shocking scene of Michael being hooked up to I.V.’s.

Now Craig states that there was a STATEMENT made by Miss Katherine that Metzger had come to the house on behalf of her doctor, but in truth Miss Katherine had said that Metzger had nothing to do with her being in Arizona.  Geraldo asks who sent Metzger to the house and Craig answers that Perry Sanders (the one the five Jackson siblings complained about in the letter to estate execs), stated that Jermaine and Rebbie knew about this examination.  He said that Sanders went to Arizona and “confirmed” that Miss Katherine did not know where she was going and had no communication with Calabassas.  She didn’t know she was reported missing and she didn’t know the children were trying to contact her.  This is what Sanders allegedly told Craig.

Geraldo then goes to Tanay Jackson who he states is Tito’s daughter.  What she says is interesting.

Tanay begins stating that she wants to make it clear that Miss Katherine was “not kidnapped”.  I also notice that Miss Tanay is wearing a very interesting upside down pyramid pendent which covers her décolletage.  She touches it and moves her hair to bring attention to it.  




Part 2


Geraldo starts this part off by ticking me off (Paris foils a plot by her aunts and uncles to gain control of Michael’s estate) aGAIN bringing Michael’s kids into this when a FAKE Paris has been twittering  (as Prince’s removed Tweet stated, pictured below)


Prince’s Twitter Removed



After it was removed This showed up from Paris



Radar Online of course, carried that story, and of course the fake Paris is tweeting that the Real Prince tweet was false and the ones slamming her relatives were real.  If tweets are being removed so late at night, you know it is not Michael’s REAL children that are removing them.  This is the Estate hired hacks that are involved in this impersonation of Michael’s children. – Source, http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2012/07/paris-jackson-confirms-brother-prince-twitter-hacked-false

This is the kind of bullcrap that the Jackson family is battling.  This is how slimey that sick excuse of a human being John-Racketeer-Branca is and John McClain, his non-existent, shadow sidekick who is co-executor in name only.  He has no voice, and no one has seen the man since Michael’s 2002 Marvel Studios Tour.  For all we know the man is dead too and Branca took over HIS identity.

Back to Tanay (sorry ‘bout that Tanay).

T.J. has (currently) co-guardianship of Michael’s children (his REAL ones), who of course is Tanay’s brother.  Tanay answers Geraldo that she is speaking with the “consent” of one relative.  When Geraldo asks who that is, she declines to identify.  I thought that was odd.  Why not?  However I respected that she did NOT want to answer that  (I will explain why at the end).

She says she has not spoken to T.J. since he was granted co-guardianship.  I find this a bit odd since they are brother and sister, but this seems to happen a lot in the Jackson family.  She mentions a lot going on and a court dealing going on but doesn’t specify what court dealing.  This leaves us with the idea that there is a court case in process in regard to the will and the guardianship of Michael’s children.

She is asked if she knew where Miss Katherine was and she stated she did and KNEW that she was not kidnapped.  Now if SHE knew this, wouldn’t T.J. have also known this?

Tanay declines to go into detail about what Michael’s children may have known about Miss Katherine’s whereabouts.  She responded that THAT was not explained to her, so she surmises that perhaps Miss Katherine did not tell them, but that she was not privy to that information.

Geraldo gets rude (sorry, but that’s what he was) and he challenges Tanay about knowing what is going on in her own family (I'll get to this in a minute.  And here is where I start to want throw things at him because Geraldo, you’re JOURNALIST who interviewed LAWYERS connected to the ESTATE and who are PAID by the ESTATE and you take the stance that THEY know more, and that TABLOIDS know more about what is going on in the family then the ACTUAL FAMILY MEMBERS.  He could also stop interrupting her.)

Tanay handles that with a bit of attitude, and the tone of her voice sounds like “Yeah, Geraldo I know what the circumstances are, and you’re just a lowlife bottomfeeder that doesn’t know a daggone thing about my family that the other bottomfeeders don’t tell you.” – but she doesn’t actually say that.   She states that “Yeah I do, I do is this Geraldo?  Yeah I do”.

Why did she have to ask if this was Geraldo?  Is she getting feed in that ear piece from two different sources?  She also lets out this odd “okay” as if she is talking to someone else or getting a cue from someone else through that earpiece.

Then Geraldo continues by asking her about this “altercation” between Janet and Paris.  Tanay states that Paris was just trying to stop the tweets, that “Paris” is a teenager and is emotional.  Geraldo challenges why Paris would not know what was going on and she did.  Tanay answers because she spoke with someone in the family.  (And I guess this means that Trent is not a member of the family, who is the one who actually called in the missing person’s report).

Geraldo asks if Miss Katherine was supposed to be going with Trent to a concert in New Mexico instead of with Rebbie to Arizona and Tanay looks confused and says no that’s not true, she didn’t know anything about her going to a concert.

She answers no, that there was no physical altercation between Randy and Trent.  Geraldo asks if that was the scuffle that was reported and she says “no, no I don’t know anything about that.”  When Geraldo asks if it’s her opinion that everything was copacetic with this ‘disappearance’, I love the look on her face and the “Yah! Yah!” as if “that’s all you’re gonna get outta me!”  She answered Geraldo as if she were in court. :o)  She kept her answers pretty short and didn’t elaborate or take any bait.

Geraldo apologizes for interrupting her twice, which was rather polite and I appreciated he did that.

Part 3


Geraldo starts off with a summary of the letter to executors from Janet, Rebbie, Tito, Randy and Jermaine, Miss Katherine’s trip to Arizona, “Paris” tweets and the fact that this “Paris” tweeted for help from the “fan community” with the phone number of security personnel (whom Micheline did actually call to see if it was a real number).

No one questions the validity of a child/alleged child who tweets to the following fan base with her security’s phone number?  Was this Trent’s number?  And why would this person give permission for “Paris” to tweet this to the general public unless of course they were on board with creating this firestorm against the Jackson siblings that questioned the estate executors?

The phone number WAS 818-876-0186.  This is probably changed now since all America has seen it, but if it hasn’t been changed yet . . . I invite you to call it.  Call it and say whatever you want to them. They put it out there, you might as well give them what they asked for . . . attention!

Geraldo covers Jermaine’s tweets confirming his mother is resting.  He plays a recording allegedly of and interview with Randy stating that Miss Katherine was told to get away via doctors orders.

The only reason I can think of that Miss Katherine would have been taken out of the house without the knowledge of the people living with her that are allegedly Michael’s children is if those people in the house are NOT REALLY MICHAEL’S CHILDREN and Trent is no relative.  If it was doctors orders that she had to get away, could it be the stress of being surrounded by people installed by the estate executors that are impersonating family members?

Then a tweet from Paris is shown addressing the subject of Dr. Metzger:


“Paris” Tweet



So now we come to the subject of Dr. Metzger.  Geraldo had mentioned that later in person, Miss Katherine had no clue that Dr. Metzger was involved in this.  That means one thing . . . if the FAMILY did not hire Dr. Metzger, then only one other entity did and THAT entity would have been the SAME ENTITY that hired Dr. Metzger to infuse Michael with I.V.’s during TOURS . . . so who would THAT have been?

If Metzger did not see Miss Katherine then someone planted the idea in the press that he did SPECIFICALLY TO DISCREDIT THE FAMILY.

BRANCA. The same pseudo-gentleman who made sure Dr. Klein and Metzger got paid for their services, but not the people Michael hired outside of Sony.

Geraldo shows the security video of Janet (allegedly Janet, allegedly Paris and allegedly Randy, where it looks as if Janet is trying to grab the phone).  Some dufus on TMZ says that Janet slapped Paris Jackson in the face.  Clearly this did not happen.  It was also spread around by the Branca goons on twitter (Qbees and the like) that the family arrived there with a film crew, and that Janet called Paris a spoiled b*tch and that Paris told Janet to “get the f*ck out”.

The FILM CREW consisted of cell phones being held up to record the goings on.  I surmise that these will come out eventually.

I’m also getting the impression that Miss Katherine may have been gotten out of the house, away from the people the estate installed around her that are NOT her relatives or grandchildren, and that the family members went over there to confront the posers, stop the fake Paris from tweeting, and you can see Randy directing Janet to capture something on video with her camera.  I’m sure this will come out in time.  Miss Katherine may have been gotten out of the way long enough for them to get some evidence that this fakery was going on.

T.J.  Why would the estate be okay with him having custody?  Perhaps they believe they have him under control.  Tanay doesn’t seem concerned about that.

A recording of Randy stating they went to the home to let “Paris and Prince” know that they can visit with Grandma.  For now they are not addressing any issue of a fake Paris and Prince.  For all we know that was a fake Randy recording.  They’ve done it with Michael plenty of times, Randy who’s voice has not been heard as much as Michael’s, would be easy.

Then we have the “interview” with Marlon, Jackie and Tito.  For some strange reason all three are wearing sunglasses.  Are they the real Jacksons?  Marlon sounds like Marlon, but why the glasses?  And why the hats?  And why did Marlon say she was doing well then break up and say “we don’t know where she is”?

Is it possible that Miss Katherine was not missing or gone at all?  That this whole farce was cooked up by the estate and that THEY took her somewhere and Marlon was upset because it WASN’T family that took her?

Perhaps Janet and Randy went to the Calabassas house to confront the “fake” twitterers because they were trying to film and confront those behind this “drama”?  Note that when Marlon says he doesn’t know where his mother is, he does not SAY that this is family members doing this, he just says “he was told”.

And Perhaps Tito and Jermaine took their support from this letter against the estate executors because they were threatened with the health of their mother unless they played ball?

We know by Randy that the letter they sent to the estate was valid (if that was Randy Twittering).  Perhaps after getting that letter, the ESTATE or those hired by them are the ones who took Miss Katherine and set it up to look like the relatives behind the letter were conspiring to get control of the estate!

We know Miss Katherine said that “her children would never do that”, in reply to them kidnapping her.  That doesn’t mean she wasn’t kidnapped by someone else.

Remember how long they sequestered Michael, and Latoya from their family.  We know they are capable of this.

Oh, and Taaj Malik and TeamMichael, who also leaked the document to the fanbase?  She didn’t get it from Jackson family members.  She got it from ContactMusic web site.  Contact Music reports in favor of Sony and the Estate.  So the Jackson family, although may have WANTED to keep this private, were made to look like troublemakers when the ESTATE leaked it to their sources for publication, then set up those family members with this “disappearance”.

And on top of that, if anyone has ever checked into the actual family of Tito Jackson . . . he HAS NO DAUGHTERS.  Tanay is a total fake.  Take a look at the picture above.  Tanay is posed in a fan photo with Joe Jackson.  Tanay is also outed on Lipstick alley as a fake AND . . . 


An article back in January of 2009 reveals that this witch SUED Tito to try and force him to publicly declare her his daughter.  She's a stalker and nothing more. - source, CelebNews

Tito's family members are listed here . . . he has three sons through Dee Dee Jackson.  He did not remarry and has no other children listed.  So Geraldo's tableside manner with her was right on the money.  This girl works for the estate and is NOT A RELATION OF THE JACKSONS.  This is why she could not identify a family member who's permission she had to speak for them (it was probably Trent, the other fake Jackson relative) and this is why she did not know anything about the will and why she said it was good.

What this is, is another version of causing drama, then trying to smooth over the problem when they get the "subjects" back into compliance.  Just like they did with Michael during both sets of allegations.  They created the problem, then flip-flopped to advocate for him (Geraldine Hughes, Aphrodite Jones, Charles Thomson, etc....)

People we need to put pressure on the estate executors all over the internet what they are doing.  They are faking everything around the Jackson family.  They are hurting Michael's REAL children, they are HURTING Miss Katherine and HURTING Michael's family!

The "other voice" in the fake Tanay's ear?  Probably Saunders, Miss Katherine's estate paid lawyer.

DO NOT LET THEM GET AWAY WITH THIS.


I’m sure more will develop from this.

God bless, and sorry for the length.  Please keep praying for the family (and truth everywhere).


20 comments:

  1. This is just another part of the Plan. Vicki is already listed as an uncredited cast member for the memorial.....wonder if she'll be credited for other chapters in this show.

    The model you note was born in the 1940's and is English (and designing clothes).

    TL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TL - Twiggy . . . is there more than one? LOL! My bad.

      Vicki. I wasn't sure about her. From her testimony in Geraldo you can't tell who's side she's on. Thank you for reminding us of her place on the memorial. I didn't even remember her there.

      Delete
  2. BONNIE - Your last Para on Tanay "Jackson" is not surprising. Who knew she existed 2 weeks ago ? Even if she is Tito's daughter from a past encounter with an unknown, she surely has not much of Tito or the Jacksons. Just a bold & smart chick, better said an opportunistic vulture now also using the Jacksons' latest events to boost her career by putting her boobs on TV & talking about a family feud that doesn't concern her. Tanay also said Katherine is too old to raise children : does she know better than Michael who is good for his MJ3 ? did she raise 10 children like Katherine ? Did Katherine really expect at 80 to get the guardianship of the MJ3 with all the tricks of the Estate & other leeches that go with it when she could have instead enjoyed the MJ3 differently with her son Michael around ? Katherine doesn't only "need her space" but an ocean from that ordinary troublemaker. Grrrrrr ! Geraldo at "Narrow": "promoting" a nobody like Tanay to comment on the Jacksons, is that all he could find ? Go home ! A pity for he also made nice interviews with Michael in 2004 & publicly defended him in 2005 (I know you disagree as Geraldo also played bad games as well before).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She didn't "become" a "Jackson family member" until early 2009 in the press. Her "boobs" were covered well enough by the upside down pyramid, but the full size pic with Joe, you can tell she's not a Jackson. She looks and dresses like your typical hired Jackson stalker.

      The estate put Katherine in as gaurdian in this post-2005 constructed fake will because they perceived they already had total control of her and she is a senior citizen. They figure her easily manipulated.

      I think if it weren't for Geraldo certain issues would not have been looked at a second time - so I thank him for that. He didn't seem like he believed her either. I agree! "GO HOME!"

      Geraldo plays both sides of the fence. He's a JOURNALIST. But he has been fair to Michael and this interview was certainly revealing whether he meant it to be or not.

      Delete
  3. Bonnie,

    This is really getting wild!! A lot of the public believe it too! One of my co- workers asked me what was wrong with that crazy Jackson family. He said they all need to die (how cruel I thought). He said Mike should have left the money to animals. He likened them to the Kardashians. I told him you should not believe everything the news says, but he buys the news reports hook, line and sinker! I asked him if he had seen the video ( Janet and fake Paris) His answer- No. So how can a person believes what they say if you haven't viewed it for yourself? (Brainwashed)
    When I watched the video it looked as if Janet was using her phone to record the fake Paris and wanted to get a close up. I though she swiped at the fake Paris's phone too and then Randy appears while the fake Paris moves out of the cameras view. Randy begins pointing in the direction of the fake Paris while Janet is recording.
    I question how was the security tape released to the public?
    Also, there was a report where it was stated that TJ spoke to his grandmother but it didn't sound like her. That her speech was impaired. I was thinking don't tell me they snatched Miss Katherine to try to make Mike appear?? Because I like you, Bonnie think they know they didn't take out the Real Michael Jackson. I think that's why Conrad Murray continues to state: he did not kill Michael Jackson!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unfortunately anonymous, this is the impression with most people who believe the news tells the truth. We don't even know if the KARDASHIANS are the Kardashians.

      I agree with you. He hasn't seen the video, so what is he basing his opinion on?

      You're right. Janet and Randy were recording with their phones. Someone did something that made Randy point toward the front door, and Janet turned away from "Paris" just as "Paris" began walking toward the door of the house.

      The security tape was released to the public by Trent. He's the only one that would have had access to it. And he did it to cook up this story that Janet was abusing "Paris".

      We have to remember that we do NOT know T.J.'s real position in this. We know what the news has REPORTED that he said. T.J. may very well have told a judge that Miss Katherine didn't sound like herself. But we have no proof that ANY of the Jackson's took Katherine out. The photo produced with Rebbie and her family playing cards with Miss Katherine? Look how YOUNG Rebbie looks compared to today! (Sorry Rebbie, you look fantastic, but you ARE younger in that picture). Rebbie's hair is not even the same. This is an OLDER picture that someone in the house got ahold of and submitted to prove Rebbie was with Katherine and that SHE took her. Jermaine and his brothers were PERFORMING when this was going on . . . so any statements made were done by siblings who only knew what they were told.

      I still believe they know Michael escaped them. I also firmly believe that they are not going to get away with this.

      Delete
  4. Oh Bonnie I was also thinking what about an online petition of some sort???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous,

      I believe in Branca's case, we should just bury him in individual letters. I also believe we should pummel the news agencies. They need to know WE KNOW. I'm going to pound on this idea for a bit, but online petitions have no power behind them. Branca doesn't care about signatures.

      Delete
  5. Anonymous, thank YOU. And you're welcome. Please accept my apology.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Janet Jackson and siblings Rebbie and Randy are not stopping the fight to overturn Michael Jackson’s Will. They seem to have lost Jermaine, however. Janet put a statement from their lawyer, Blair Brown (not the famous actress) on her website, in which she and the remaining three vowed to keep fighting for “what Michael wanted.” What Michael wanted, however, was for all them to go away, and not be interested in his money. Paris Jackson Tweeted something to that effect today. Janet Jackson is no longer “the normal Jackson.” Her interest in this is peculiar to say the least. So is her antipathy to Michael’s co-executor John McClain. Without McClain, Janet would never have had a singing career. At this point, she’d be better off writing Randy a check and shutting this thing down. Janet, Randy, and Rebbie’s letter is beyond clueless. They’re claiming the estate is managed badly. When Michael was alive, he was the defendant in dozens of lawsuits, and had nearly $400 million in debts. He had no home. Since he died, the estate has earned hundreds of millions of dollars; his children are secure for life. What the heck are these people talking about? Here’s a reproduction of the letter:
    - Source, http://www.showbiz411.com/2012/08/04/janet-jackson-and-two-siblings-still-want-michael-jacksons-executors-out



    "At the time, I trusted people to be honest with me," Jackson said. "While I was away, I had no reason to question whether the people whom I placed the trust would inform me that Prince, Paris and Blanket were trying to reach me."

    Those people included four of her children -- Janet, Jermaine, Randy and Rebbie Jackson -- according to her lawyers and others involved in the events. Her other children, including La Toya, Tito, Marlon and Jackie, have said they did not know where their mother was taken. -

    Source, http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/03/showbiz/jackson-family-drama/index.html

    ReplyDelete
  7. Twitter from Taryll Jackson -


    Taryll Jackson ‏@tarylljackson
    @eonline Tanay Jackson is NOT related to us. Please clear up any confusion you may have caused. Thank You.

    Thank you for verifying Taryll. ♥

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hey Bonnie,

    i think this Celeb News Link is broken...
    greetings

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Anonymous,

      Thank you . . . Just fixed it (they took the page down, how convenient) Tons of other sources have it. And I just did another twitter blast to the main news sources. Even if they don't take action, it will be seen.

      Delete
  9. Hey Bonnie,

    I was checking out the latest blog and saw you posted about Tanay Jackson. I saw the tweet that Taryll has sent out stating that Tanay is not their sister. What crossed my mind is if she is not their sister and she's speaking on behalf of the Jackson family using their name and all, shouldn't the family press charges against her for fraud? Maybe it will put a stop to all those who are passing themselves off as a family members when they are not.

    I sent an article via email that I think you really need to check out. Hit me back!

    P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi P,

      I'm working on tonight's blog. As to why the Jacksons are not suing the tar out of all imposters - the same reason Michael could not go legally after every person that lied about him. They'd be in court longer then there are years in the human lifespan. There are other things going on that will eventually expose the whole structure, including Branca and his filthy deceit. It will not stop other attackers coming on board. That's like saying that suing one drug dealer will bring down the whole drug cartel.

      I'll go look at your article after dinner ... Micheline sent me one too but I don't know if it will fit in tonight's blog. Do you want me to respond to it here or in email? Let me know! And thank you!

      Delete
    2. You can respond to me about the article via email.

      P

      Delete
    3. I think that Tanay girl was supposed to do her piece on Geraldo for whatever reason (not saying I believe she's a Jackson relative) because like so much of the rest of all this,,,,,its been scripted.Of course the family can go ahead and say,,,,"she's not related" but that wouldn't matter if she was actually playing a role of some kind. Its like a mix of a reality show and a scripted piece... abit like when Joaquin Phoenix was himself but not himself...if anyone can understand what on earth i mean !!!!

      TL

      Delete
    4. TL,

      So are you saying that you believe she is on the Jackson's side?

      Delete
  10. Okay, someone please tell me how a "christian woman" can claim to be Biblical and write this kind of stuff?

    This is the same person that has repeatedly sent comments to this blog (that I delete) claiming Michael is some restless spirit posessing her and other women and "making them" write about them. She says I need to "help him cross over".

    On her blog she publishes links of people that need to be stopped. One of the Hoax forums and THIS BLOG. She wants people to stop writing about Michael. The Hoax forum and this blog are the only blogs she attacks.

    A Christian who reads the Bible doesn't believe in "spirits" that wander around "posessing people". The Bible calls them "demons". And DEMONS can call themselves by any name they want, which tells me that the person who is writing this blog - if she really believes "Michael" is posessing her and other women, is perhaps not as Christian as she claims to be.

    https://twitter.com/nikkijoy7 This is who she is. She is the is also twittering about the same teenager that posted to this blog.

    Not that anyone believes this strange person, but it seems even the weird and unexplained for some reason do not want to help Michael get the truth out. And anyone having a problem with the truth is not about the truth OR about God. Which leaves only one other source.

    Beware of them. They are out there in all shapes and sizes.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Katherine Jackson: Vigilance could be key for her, Michael Jackson’s children
    By Barbara Reynolds

    Reynolds is an ordained minister, a columnist for TheRootDC and the author of six books, including “Out of Hell and Living Well, Healing From the Inside Out.” She is a former editor and columnist for USA Today.

    After the world watched the slow crumbling life of superstar Michael Jackson, the stage could be set for another tragedy in the life of his elderly mother, resulting from the millions her son left behind."


    The article continues as Reynolds lays the blame at the feet of the Jackson brothers and sisters:


    "Unfortunately, the suspected grab for Katherine Jackson’s money is not unusual. The National Council on Aging says that 90 percent of elder abuse where seniors are preyed upon -- if this is the case -- is not the work of strangers but the work of close family relatives, a pattern that seems to describe what is happening to Jackson. In recent weeks, Mrs. Jackson alleges that she was duped, misguided, betrayed and virtually held hostage by family members she trusted, according to court records." - Source, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/therootdc/post/katherine-jackson-vigilance-could-be-key-for-her-michael-jacksons-children/2012/08/09/7efab778-e0f6-11e1-a421-8bf0f0e5aa11_blog.html


    She then informs her readers of a part of Randy Jackson's statement to Al Sharpton during an interview, where he stated the Estate was using the children to pressure Miss Katherine to say things in favor of the estate.


    "Randy also stated in an interview with the Rev. Al Sharpton on MSNBC “that the executors of Michael’s estate — John Branca and John McClain — were “using the children to try and put pressure on my mom to try and come out and get her to say things in their favor, to kind of clean up their image.”



    In a sworn declaration, Jackson suggested she had been held incommunicado: “When I arrived at the resort, I was asked if I could communicate by iPad and I answered, “Yes,” and my iPad was taken. My telephone was not working, and I could not dial out. There were no pictures on the television in my room.”

    Little did she know that during her absence that her grandchildren were upset because they could not talk to her. Granddaughter Paris was tweeting her concerns to the world that she wanted her grandmother home at once. Court documents state that Jackson learned that she had been reported missing when a broken TV in her room suddenly powered on and began broadcasting a story about her alleged kidnapping. In addition, she said, “I was also never told that on July 25, my attorney Perry Sanders had flown to Tucson to find out what was going on.” That meeting, however, was not allowed to take place.

    In her written statement, she said: “When I asked about my grandchildren, I was informed . . . they were fine. I was never informed that Prince, Paris, Blanket and [grandson] TJ were trying to reach me. At the time, I trusted the people I was with to be honest with me.” - Source, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/therootdc/post/katherine-jackson-vigilance-could-be-key-for-her-michael-jacksons-children/2012/08/09/7efab778-e0f6-11e1-a421-8bf0f0e5aa11_blog.htm

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.