Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Jesus and Michael the Great Prince

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Friday, October 5, 2012

Jesus and Michael the Great Prince


The Etymology of Michael




Yesterday I had a prayer answered, or actually it was the night before.  But I finished the blog yesterday with that answer. 

Today I want to go into a little more detail and I am going to bring Michael Jackson into this because if it wasn’t for him and his faith, I would never have started on this path.

Yesterday, I posted this on the affiliation Biblically with Jesus and the Archangel Michael:



We were told in 1 Thessalonians 4:16 – "For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:"

How does this surely tie Christ in with the Archangel Michael?  You almost want to believe that since the Jehovah’s witnesses and the Seventh Day Adventists are the only ones seemingly to teach this, that it has to be wrong because they are, after all “cults” . . . aren’t they?

But it’s in scripture.  You may not agree with their militant “visitations” requirements for their members and you may not agree with what they did to Michael Jackson, but look what happened to him AFTER he left that church?

We were given another story by the press and in interviews a young Michael who we all know by now, told stories mostly to protect others.  Latoya was kidnapped by Jack Gordon, Janet was neck deep in the industry and Michael also had to protect his mother, who was and to my knowledge still is very much a member of that church.

Below, the scripture in the Gospel of John tells us who’s voice belongs to the “archangel”:


"For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself;  27 And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man.

28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,  29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation."

Not the voice FROM an archangel but HIS VOICE.  And just to get the Jehovah’s witnesses and Seventh Day Adventists off the hook here, they are not the ONLY ONES who believed Jesus and the Archangel Michael were the same.


Early Protestant Beliefs

Some early Protestant scholars identified Michael with the pre-incarnate Christ, basing their view, partly on the juxtaposition of the "child" and the archangel in Revelation 12, and partly on the attributes ascribed to him in Daniel.” – Source,Wikipedia/Michael_(archangel)_earlyprotestantviews

So what changed?


We showed in the previous blog how “angels of God” were God actually speaking to various people and prophets in the Bible on yesterday’s blog (Angels of God).  Now let’s concentrate specifically on the Archangel himself and Christ.

And before people read these two blogs and think I am advocating for Jehovah’s Witness doctrine, I am not.  Jehovah’s Witness still teach some dangerous doctrine, some examples are toward the end of this blog.


We also posted on yesterday’s blog that early Protestant views also held that the Archangel Michael was Jesus before Jesus had a human body.  We took the questions about angels and the archangel Michael and Jesus directly from SCRIPTURE, not from any religion.  So now let’s move on.


Jesus The Seventh Son or Seventy Seventh Generation?

On the previous blog we had also quoted verses from Revelation 1, 3, 4 and 5 that mentioned the “seven Spirits of God”, the seven churches, and the fact that John was told to “write these things” to the “angels of” those seven churches.

Revelation 5:6 also reveals that the “slain lamb also had the seven Spirits of God because Christ was God in the flesh:

And I beheld, and, lo, in the midst of the throne and of the four beasts, and in the midst of the elders, stood a Lamb as it had been slain, having seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven Spirits of God sent forth into all the earth.

The number seven is quite prominent in the Bible.  Michael Jackson, of whom most people I know that ridiculed him were not aware that he was a very Christ-faithful man, sported sevens on some of his clothing, and in his own artwork.

Michael Jackson’s clothing sported the “777” armband and occasionally the embroidered jacket or shirt, but there has been some argument as to whether this was the Kabbalah number his handlers made him wear, or if he wore it for another reason. 

Since the number itself does not appear in the Bible, I had a lot of trouble with this.  The only correlation is In Revelation possibly, if you put together the seven seals, the seven angels with the seven trumpets and the seven angels with the bowls of plagues at the end times.  You could put those together and make 777, but the number itself is not present in the Bible.  And since this number is a heavily used number in Jewish mysticism and the ancient Babylonian religion, I questioned Michael’s wearing of it.  But we’ll get to the music industry’s created “Image” of Michael Jackson later.

The generations from God to Adam all the way through to Jesus according to Biblical historians is seventy seven.

"Augustine[6] notes that the count of generations in Luke is 77, a remarkable number symbolizing the forgiveness of all sins.[7] This count also agrees with the seventy generations from Enoch[8] set forth in the Book of Enoch, which Luke probably knew.[9] Though Luke never counts the generations as Matthew does, it appears that he too follows the hebdomadic principle of working in sevens." – Source, Wikipedia

Here is the passages in Luke dealing with the Generations (lineage) of Christ.  Luke 3:23–38

From God, to Jesus is 77 generations.  Seventy from Enoch.  I counted myself, in Luke.  I also have a chart of Jesus lineage all the way back to Adam.  God is my everything.  Isn’t it amazing?  God is certainly consistent.  Perhaps God likes his patterns not because HE needs them, but as a blueprint for us to learn from.

 Now that we have that bit of knowledge about the generations to Jesus Christ, let’s look at the created Spirit of God, Michael.

It is said in Ecclesiastes 1:9 that there is nothing new under the sun. What has been done will again be done.  So we see a pattern of people appearing that don’t seem to have a lineage.  There are three.  Adam, and Jesus, the second Adam (Jesus’ is fathered by the Holy Spirit), but there was one before Jesus.

Melchizedek.


"For this Melchisedec, king of Salem, priest of the most high God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings, and blessed him;  2 To whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all; first being by interpretation King of righteousness, and after that also King of Salem, which is, King of peace;

3 Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually.  4 Now consider how great this man was, unto whom even the patriarch Abraham gave the tenth of the spoils."


Melchizedek is also spelled various ways in the Bible, but he is mentioned in Genesis, Psalms and in the New Testament.  In Hebrews, Paul talks about how great this “king” was and it was also important that he include in his letter that he was “without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days nor end of life but made like unto the Son of God.”

The etymology of Melchizedek reads as follows:

"The Epistle to the Hebrews, along with Philo and Josephus, interpret the name as meaning "the king", and "tzedek", meaning "righteous(ness)" or "justice". This interpretation is upheld by modern scholars because in the Dead Sea Scroll 4QAmram 2.3 is found the opposite name Melchi-resha
("king of evil") for a chief angel of darkness" - Source, Wikipedia/Melchizedek


The opposite “Melchi-resha” if the Dead Sea Scrolls are not a fraud, would set Melchizedek up as the “opposite” of “chief angel of darkness”, as the “chief angel of God”, which would be Michael.  As Paul said in Hebrews 7, Melchizedek had no “beginning or end of life” and no lineage.  And I find it rather meaningful that Melchizedek just happens to show up during another time of great apostasy – right before the destruction of Sodom.

Is this a pattern that God wants us to see, to help us recognize the end?

Before the flood we had Noah, who’s great-grandfather Enoch was taken up into heaven without dying.

Before the destruction of Sodom we have Melchizedek who is described as a great priest without lineage, birth or death.

Jesus breaks the cycle by dying on the cross for our sins and to restore us through the power of his pure blood.  Satan is put away for a thousand years and Christ reins in Heaven with the saints that were resurrected with him (Matt. 27:51-53).  From that point on, Satan is defeated.  From that point through the end times, Human beings have a chance to accept Christ as Lord, repent and be saved from what is to come.  However those demons still at work are also still deceiving mankind and building Satan’s army.  We are close to God making his margin call.

The ONLY healing we have is through Christ.  The devil has been let loose to deceive man for “a little season”, into believing that MAN is going to fix his own corrupted bodies and spirits.  Christ heals our DNA and he restores our souls.  Satan using man has corrupted our DNA and atrophied our souls.

The end, it says in Daniel, will come with a flood, but it will also come with earth and the firmament burning up and a new Heaven and new Earth being created.  Who gets taken up before all this begins to unfold?

Michael, the “great prince” in Daniel 12:1.  Could Melchizedek, Michael and Jesus all be the same spirit?


"Some Jews used to think he was the Ur-Mensch (the Original Man), in whose image Adam was created; some that he was Noah's son Shem reincarnated. Others that he was an archangel, perhaps Michael. Early church fathers taught that he was the preincarnate Jesus. Some Christians today still teach that Melchizedek was Jesus the Son of God, even though the New Testament never makes this connection." – Source, Hebrew-streams.org


There is also a passage in the Gospel of John that I quoted last night, in which Jesus tells the Pharisees that he was here before Abraham:


"Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?  58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am."


Was he here as Melchizedek?

Now let’s look at the etymology of Michael.



Etymology of “Michael”


Michael – the name means “who is like God”.

The name Michael is quite popular in the Bible. The most famous Michael is the archangel and angelic captain (Dan 10:21) who battled satan over the body of Moses (Jude:9) and expels satan from heaven (Rev 12:9). Other Michaels are: The father of the Asherite spy of the reconnaissance contingent that also includes Joshua (Numbers 13:13); Two Gadites (1 Chronicles 5:13,14); a Levite musician in service of the Davidic tabernacle (1 Chronicles 6:40); A son of Uzzi, son of Tola, son of Issachar, one of the twelve sons of Jacob (1 Chronicles 7:3); a Benjaminite (1 Chronicles 8:16); A captain from Manasseh (1 Chronicles 12:20); The father of Omri, the chief of Issachar during David's days (1 Chronicles 27:18); A son of king Jehoshaphat (2 Chronicles 21:2); And the father of one of the returnees under Ezra, named Zebadiah (Ezra 8:8);" - source, Entymology of "Michael"

"The name Michael is commonly translated with Who Is Like God, but, more accurately, the name denotes a question or rather an inquisition for the identity of God: Who's God? or What's God Like? As captain of the heavenly armies and expeller of satan, Michael's main mission is perhaps to inspire humans into seeking the identity of God:

Who is like Thee among the gods, O Lord? Who is like Thee, majestic in holiness, awesome in praises, working wonders? - Exodus 15:11 - Source, abarim-publications.com/meaning/Michael

"From the bible, the Archangel, meaning "He who is closest to God" - Source, Urban Dictionary/from the Bible


I also found this:


"Archangel simply means the head or chief messenger. It's taken from the two Greek root words [archo], meaning the first in rule or power, and [aggelos] meaning messenger, or one who brings tidings. It is also translated as the chief or top messenger. The word [aggelos] (messenger) is also translated angel (in that an Angel is a messenger from God) to signify one who brings tidings from God." - Source, mountaintretreat.org


On that same site was a slightly different interpretation of the name Michael in Hebrew:


"The word Michael is of Hebrew origin [miykael] and most nearly means "He who is assuredly God". Taken from the root Hebrew words [miy] (who is), [kiy] (assuredly), and ['el] (God). Kiy, the prepositional prefix has also been rendered as meaning "who is certainly God" or "who is as God". This is totally consistent with all of scripture which deals with the work of Michael. For Christ, the messenger of God has or will do all the things assigned to Michael, the head or chief Messenger. Christ is the Messenger of God in charge of the army of God. And He assuredly is God, and that is what the title God gives of "Michael" signifies." - Source, mountainretreat.org


I searched out this spelling of the Hebrew name “Miykael” and found this:

"Meaning and origin
Miykael is a Hebrew boy name. The meaning of the name is `Who is Like God`." - Source, I-am-pregnant.com/names/boy/miykael


On other sources, I looked up the breakdown of the name too:


Miy - "an interrogative pronoun of persons, as (04100) is of things, who? (occasionally, by a peculiar idiom, of things" - Source, biblestudytools.com

kiy - "nevertheless, surely, that is" - Source, Biblestudytools.com

‘el - "god, god-like one, mighty one, mighty men, men of rank, mighty heroes, angels" - Source, biblestudytools.com  


So Michael the name, means “who” or “who is”, “nevertheless, surely, that is”, “God, God-like, mighty one”

After breaking it down, we put it back together:

“who nevertheless is God or God-like”, “Who is surely God or God-like” or, “who that is God or God-like”.


“God-like in my heart” at 3:36



"As captain of the heavenly armies and expeller of satan, Michael's main mission is perhaps to inspire humans into seeking the identity of God:" - Source, abarim-publications.com


Wow.  I know someone who’s name is at the top of this blog who has inspired me to do just that!  Michael – Inspires inquisition into the identity of God.  I’m going to remember that and expound on that later.  Now lets’ look at another name that is associated with God:


"Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us."


Melchizedek means “king of righteousness” or “king of Justice” (oppositeof Melchi-rasha meaning king of evil or prince of darkness).

Michael means “Who assuredly is God or God-like”.

Emmanuel means “God with us”. 

And again from yesterday:



Some early Protestant scholars identified Michael with the pre-incarnate Christ, basing their view, partly on the juxtaposition of the "child" and the archangel in Revelation 12, and partly on the attributes ascribed to him in Daniel.

Revelation 12 is linked here – read it, it’s very interesting.  And finally, the Jackson’s faith in which they were raised, Jehovah’s Witness –



Jehovah's Witnesses believe that there is only one "archangel" in heaven and in the Bible. They teach that the pre-human and post-resurrection Jesus and the Archangel Michael are the same person, saying: "the evidence indicates that the Son of God was known as Michael before he came to earth and is known also by that name since his return to heaven where he resides as the glorified spirit Son of God." They point out that the actual term "Archangel" in the Bible is only used in the singular, never clearly in the plural.


Michael as the Great Prince

"But I will shew thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince."

"And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book."


Jesus the great prince

"For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace."

"But ye denied the Holy One and the Just, and desired a murderer to be granted unto you;  15 And killed the Prince of life, whom God hath raised from the dead; whereof we are witnesses."

"The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree.  31 Him hath God exalted with his right hand to be a Prince and a Saviour, for to give repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins."


Both Michael and Jesus stand for justice and for the children of Israel (spiritual Israel – all those who are saved).


"And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood,"

"Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.  12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. 

13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.  14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness;"


Our armour is the blood of Jesus Christ.  We cannot stand against the devil except through  him.  Jesus stands for his children.  Michael stands for his children.
  
On this website where I got the etymology of the word “Michael”, I found this:

"Christ came to cast the accuser down and establish the Kingdom of God in Righteousness in Him. When we see the symbolism in Revelation chapter 12 of Michael and His messengers fighting against the Satan and his messengers, it is a picture of Christ, the ruling Messenger going forth in war against Satan and those He rules over. They are the two who have battled from the very beginning (Gen. 3:15)." – Source, Etymology of Michael/bible


At the time that “Michael” stands up in Daniel 12, he no longer is restraining the evil and lets go of the reins.  In heaven Satan is cast down to the earth and a third of his angels as well and they wreak havoc as well because they “know their time is short”.

There is also another interesting fact.  If the Archangel is also Christ, and he is the one that is restraining the evil (remember Alice Bailey said the rein of Christ must end, for their new world order to take place), wouldn’t he have to “leave” before they could bring out their counterfeit or . . . for “evil to be revealed”?

I will close with this tonight . . .


It is one thing to throw accusations at various churches, religions or denominations and call them a cult.  It’s another to buy their doctrine just because they have A TRUTH attached to it.


Jehovah’s Witness was founded by Charles T. Russell – a 33rd degree Mason.  That much I do know.

I also know that they are every bit as pagan in their doctrine as Jewish Mysticism even though most every day parishners are not aware of it.  Case in point:


“Divine Plan of the Ages”




Look familiar?  This is the very same symbol of “Ra” that David Wilcock uses for the entity he “channels”.  This has nothing to do with Christ.  Inside that book we have this:


“Divine Plan of the Ages Chart”




Isn’t that pretty?  Wonder where Mr. Russell “channeled” THIS from?  Rothschild perhaps?  Geeze.

This does not mean that all Jehovah’s Witnesses will go to hell any more than every Baptist will go to Heaven.  There are individuals in every religion, walk of life, country, ethnicity and culture that WILL RECOGNIZE GOD when it is their time to see the truth.  It is our job as God’s witnesses to put the truth out there.  Just plant the seed – with love.  Something I too tend to forget when I see Obama’s face on my newsfeed on Facebook (I still don’t think he’s human, but that’s just my opinion).

Tomorrow, we will take another look at the Luciferian angle on this.

God bless you and THANK YOU for you all hanging in there.


"For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,

39 Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord."






"And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful."


39 comments:

  1. Hi Bonnie,
    Iv seen many things said about the witnesses beliefs/practices etc that couldnt be further from what they teach.. Infact many are a complete contradiction of what they teach. I also wondered why Michaels Mother would remain a witness if it is pagen.. I myself am not a JW but my Grandfather was and I know that he studdied constantly. So much of what you have covered here my Grandfather was teaching before I was born.. Fallen angels, not to take someone elses blood/DNA, not to take vaccines, symbols are pagan, not to have idols, to be wary of the messages in music etc etc. Im not saying they are right about everything. I do wonder though why they are attacked with so many untrue things. They have been wrong or fooled by certain things but have corrected them. Isnt that true about many of us here today? I have seen the pictures of the pyramid at the burial site of Charles T Russell and thought they looked fake. Was he even the person that founded the Jehovah's witness? Was he really a mason?
    I know you are very busy but I wondered if at some point you could take a look at this site. Im in no way near as smart as you so I would value your opinion.

    http://pastorrussell.blogspot.co.uk/2008/09/was-charles-taze-russell-mason.html

    Like I said im not a JW, im just interested in the truth seeing as all of what I have seen said isnt what I understood to be true at all. It seems those attacked the most are those that have the least to hide.

    God bless you Bonnie xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HI Anonymous,

      Like I said most of your parishners are not aware of what is taught in the upper levels, just like in the Freemasons. I also believe that MOST in the witnessing level of the church are Christ centered. But as far as the church doctrine being accused of things that aren't true . . . Did Charles Russell author that book "Divine Plan of the Ages" or not? Is that chart taught or displayed anywhere in the church or not? Why does the "Watchtower" Magazine, of which I have a copy, sport the cross through the crown symbol?

      Please understand that I personally do not look to go after JW. But if a book written by their church founder sports the symbol of "Ra" on it's cover and the New World Pyramid on its "Divine Plan" chart . . . AND it's own, church specific authored Bible sporting the "New World Translation" title, I have to ask you, what else do I have to see before "coincidence" is no longer coincidence?

      I have seen this website before. Here is what caught my eye:

      "Many do not want you to see the first photo from 1916, showing that Pastor Russell was dead long before the Masonic Temple was built. And others do not want you to see the second photo, because some people teach that Russell is buried "under the Pyramid", or "in the Pyramid", or that the Pyramid is "his grave marker." Now, how can that be, see Russell's headstone, see the Pyramid marker, they are in two different locations, with other graves in between them. The pyramid marker was used as a marker for all (275) of the Watchtower Society burial plots in the Cemetery, nothing more. "

      Last sentence: "The pyramid marker was used as a marker for ALL (275) of the Watchtower Society burial plots in the cemetery . . ."

      Question: Why would they use a pyramid AT ALL? Is that their church symbol that every JW plot at that cemetery has to be recognized by a pyramid?

      New World Translation: http://www.jw.org/en/publications/bible/ This is from their own web site.

      Again from their official web site:

      "Russell published a book that came to be called The Divine Plan of the Ages, this volume contained a chart linking the ages of mankind with the Great Pyramid of Egypt." - Source,
      http://wol.jw.org/en/wol/s/r1/lp-e?q=Divine+plan+for+the+ages&p=par

      JW was a church set up and funded originally by an agent of Rothschild through the Rockefellers just as the Mormon churc was. Both churches were started within 100 miles of each other, within 50 years of each other. Both use the same sun god symbols.

      I've been through this last year with someone through email. I don't know if you are that same person, but it's pretty hard to argue for their innocence it's all over their own official web site.

      I will have more on this later too, since their "cross through the crown" is a mocking symbol of Christ, or some some thought. But it's actually in reference to the second "Adam". And since Michael Jackson and his mom hailed from this church THAT particular piece of info makes me very, VERY nervous.

      Believe me I would LOVE for all this to be false and Michael's mother to be safe. But it's not and SHE'S not. And if they are teaching alse doctrine and DANGEROUS doctrine they should be exposed. And FYI, JW is not the ONLY church that has ever been persecuted. They are just picked on because they send their people knocking on doors alot. Their recruiting is almost as aggressive as Scientology.

      If you have an answer to the questions I just posted I would very much appreciate it. God bless you too.

      Delete
    2. And please forgive my typos. I was typing fast. "f" in False and "h" in church is missing. Flying fingers. Sorry.

      Delete
    3. I agree with you Bonnie about the Jehovah's Witnesses. From the research I have done. You are spot on. Katherine Jackson isn't safe and I pray she finds a nice Baptist Church that she can join. I don't believe Katherine Jackson is a pagan. I believe she is a Christian but is misguided. I hope someone tells her the truth. Some of the things JWs say are true and Biblical but a lot is brainwashing and is linked with Freemasonry.

      Delete
    4. IloveMJ,

      Katherine wasn't JW until after she moved to Indiana. She was Baptist before that (Southern Baptist P.R. vice pres. is also a member of council of foreign relations so they are not innocent either). Nearly all churches have been corrupted but individual congregations and people fight to stay true. Same with those who remain innocent, as I believe Miss Katherine is, in the JW church. I believe Miss Katherine knows every single thing that is going on and the Piers Morgan interview I saw with her, she was not happy or comfortable saying some of what she said. I am WORRIED about her! But I know God has her back. It's just really stressful!

      Delete
  2. Im sorry Bonnie, im no expert and my Grandfather is no longer here to ask. Thats why I asked you, if anyone will get to the truth u will :O) The things I had read about them sound so far from what I had understood to be true. I was unaware of the cross through the crown symbol, Id thought they were against any kind of symbol. My Grandfather would not have allowed anything like that into the house or a pyramid for that matter. Also dont they believe Jesus was crucified on a stake (due to the greek translation) so a cross seems rather an odd thing to be associated with them (I am not saying they are right or wrong about the stake). I certainly didnt know it was on an official website.
    I see where your going with that being associated with the second Adam and Michael being raised in that church :(
    Sorry that you had also been through this before, it wasnt me that you spoke to via email so I was unaware.
    I do agree that if they are teaching a false doctrine it needs to be exposed.
    And I didnt mean that they are the only church being persecuted. I ment anyone in general. Im just very poor at wording what I mean, haha.

    Thank you for taking the time to answer. God bless.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Anonymous,

      I'm sorry. I really am not trying to be insensitive to your grandfather. Mine was a Mason. My great grandfather was a high ranking Mason who got out, and I assume it was because he was discovering what they were really about. He never told us exactly why or at least he never told my mother. (I was 12 when my great grandfather died) He was very angry about it though.

      The Cross through the crown symbol is no longer used on their WatchTower magazines from what I've seen. And the reason I have their booklets in my house is because whenever they call, I let them in and I talk to them. I love the people. But I won't be recruited and I tell them that up front. But I love talking about God and I know MOST of these people are completely innocent about what is behind the true doctrine of their church. I would like to hope that JW could have changed over time and with newer hierarchy . But they still use the "New World" translation and they still push and sell the "Divine Plan" through their church website.

      Last year around May I posted sources - http://michaelsguardian.blogspot.com/2011/05/illuminati-had-big-plans-for-michael.html

      There are pictures of the insides of buildings, symbols on their magazines, and the history and origins of both the Mormon and the JW church. Ironically both of these churches were founded near regional Masonic centers. JW's near Pittsburgh and Mormon's in Western New York, then moved to Ohio.

      There were also two satanist who got out of the system they were in (one rather high ranking) that went through what some of these symbols meant because they used them. John Todd went through the different churches (all denominations) and the payouts to their upper management of those they infiltrated. John Todd was institutionalized by our government in a mental hospital where he died. But he is the one that saw the letter about the "Adam" they were looking for. I have all that on a separate blog. I did a three part series on John Todd and if you're interested you can do a search on this blog for him. I don't agree with everything John Todd said, but he was a reformed Satanist. His story is amazing. He worked inside the music industry. Never told us who "Adam" was but apparently the Rothschilds (or someone in the circle of 13) found "him" in 1970.

      Also I am not mad at you, so please don't think I am, for asking questions. I was just trying to get a lot of information in that post and they do cut off after a certain amount of characters.

      I don't even like churches badmouthing each other, and I don't like people picking on JW or anyone else because it's just ugly. But the stuff I did investigate is true even though they will deny that Russell was a Mason. Your grandfather and most parishioners that go out witnessing are unaware of what some of these logos or symbols mean just as My great grandfather spent 50 years as a Mason and had no idea they were Lucifer worshipers until he was about to become a 32 degree. That's when he got out even though he never told us the story. England called not long after that to return lands and titles back to his "family" over there and he was the next direct descendent. He told them off and that story was legendary in our family. Makes me wonder if they were trying to entice him back in. He remained silent and we are left to speculate, but he was very, very angry about it.

      Thank you for reading my ranting :o) God bless you too.

      Delete
  3. I'm not sure if its still current but when ordaining Catholic Priests they used the line "Thou are a priest forever after the order of Melchizadek".

    One of the eucharistic prayers (during the mass) makes mention of Abel, Abraham and Melchizedek also.

    There are so many thoughts on this fellow...some think he's the Archangel Michael, some think he's JC, etc etc. Are we to think that the idea of Christ (when he wasn't on the earth as Jesus) was Arch Michael whilst in heaven and then Melchizadek at one point in time. If so, are we meant to know then who the current rep of Christ is here on earth?? ( Not to be confused with all those avatars that the hippies talk about as being another incarnation of the Christ.)

    TL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Melchizedek is one of those mentioned in the Bible with suggestions of "other than" human but next to nothing is known about him. Perhaps more lies in books of the apocrypha that I haven't read. It's just like Enoch, who was such a great man that God took him up into Heaven, had him write prophecies that never appeared in the Bible (because the church has something to hide). In one of the chapters of the 2nd book of Enoch, it is stated that the book is for a future generation (says that in book 1 too) and that it will be used to judge the angels that sinned. The hairs went up on the back of my neck last year when I saw that.

      We don't have a current "rep" of Christ here on earth. If he was here, then evil could not reveal itself because it is HE they plan to mimmick. If evil is going to "reveal itself" and the false prophet is revealed in December (as the Newage people claim the "shift" will take place), then I doubt that the one who "restrains" is still here.

      Delete
    2. TL,

      Surely you heard about this?

      http://ivarfjeld.wordpress.com/2012/10/03/archbishop-we-need-world-government/

      Delete
    3. This one was in Forbes in 2011 -

      http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2011/10/25/the-vatican-calls-for-world-government/

      Do you think they all went to the same indoctrination centers as Ahmadinejad?

      Delete
    4. Quote Bonnie: We don't have a current "rep" of Christ here on earth. If he was here, then evil could not reveal itself because it is HE they plan to mimmick. If evil is going to "reveal itself" and the false prophet is revealed in December (as the Newage people claim the "shift" will take place), then I doubt that the one who "restrains" is still here.

      Why can they not mimmick someone who was/is on earth currently? They needed a perfect example of the prophet didn't they? They had one: Michael. They knew how much Michael was loved and that he was someone very special, studied him carefully and now when they THINK they got him out of the way, they can perfectly imitate him. They tried to make him look like a fool, mocked and ridiculed him (didn't they do this to Jesus a long time ago?) trying to make people loosing their faith and interest in him, to take him out of the way and now, to fit the predictions in the bible, come up with a false prophet. But Jesus was never out of the way and I believe neither was Michael. He's here, watching carefully what is going to happen and he will come back when we need him most. Oh how I wish and pray we will be saved.
      Thanks for reading Bonnie, I hope I make some sense.

      Delete
    5. Ah yes I've seen that top one Bonnie....I had never seen the bottom link though, till now. Interesting. I don't know where any of these people went apart from the obvious but I'm sure there are some that are happy to meet at a convenient place and chat about upcoming plans. So many of them its mind blowing really. Everywhere. Many of them are not in churches or running countries, but some are. Massive network. They have their own 4 yrs to get it right plan that will finish in 2014 and then the world will be just lovely for the next THOUSAND yrs......such a damned worry, Im sick of them all.

      TL

      Delete
    6. By "Michael" you mean Michael Jackson right? Well this is what I am currently working on. And there is no better way to tell then his songs. But I am also trying to adhere to this Biblically and what we find there is rather surprising.

      In Several interviews (two specifically come to mind) Michael says "In no way am I saying I am God, but I try to be God-like in my heart" . . . 1993 Neverland Statement and also in 1993 Oprah "I'm not saying I'm Jesus, I'm NOT saying that . . ."

      Those are Michael's own words. Yet in his songs he is DEFINITELY singing FOR God in some songs, TO God in other songs, and TO US about what he's going through and what THEY are doing to HIM and US. And here's the thing:

      Melchizedek wasn't Christ. He was a priest "of the highest order" and some say from Levi, but there WASN'T TRIBE of Levi yet. Abraham was the father of Israel and Israel had not yet been born. Israel is the father of Levi and the other 12 tribes. BUT Melchizedek according to the Bible was not of this world. And Enoch, even though was translated without seeing death, DID have a lineage and also had children, but was SO of God that God gave the prophecies of the end times to him . . . told him and showed him EVERYTHING about the angels, their order, their jobs, etc... and he "was found no more".

      Jesus was very, very human but very, very pure. Pure DNA as Adam had once been. Jesus was also filled with the Holy Spirit and did not begin his ministry in earnest until John the Baptist baptized him. He was also God's son but also "God with us". He did see death, but also defeated death . . . rose again as well as some of his saints that were in the ground, with him. Jesus was so filled with God that he could perform miracles, cure illnesses, bring back people to life that had died and cast out demons that tormented people.

      Jesus also SHOWED HIS DISCIPLES how to do the very same IN HIS NAME.

      Michael the archangel - Is the ONLY ANGEL that fights Satan. He's the only one that has the power to bind Satan in chains, put him in the pit for 1,000 years (While Christ Reins in Heaven with those saints that arose). Where did Michael get this power? We can fend off Satan in the Name of Yeshua the Christ, or in the name of Jesus the Christ. Michael the Archangel also needs this power in order to defeat Satan.

      Michael is the only one that "restrains" the evil here on earth until the day he is taken up. No other can restrain evil but God, and Jesus being God. Michael the Angel cannot do it without the power of Christ either.

      Michael Jackson - People have a problem with this because Jesus, after all, would never dance lewdly on stage. And I can't for the life of me picture Jesus saying the word sh*t in a song - But there is another element to the Bible prophecy that we need to pull in here, in which I thoroughly believe fits in perfectly. That is what I am working on.

      No, you're right. Jesus was never OUT of the way, he's in our hearts. But out of the way in the sense that evil was now free to reveal itself, which it will . . . shortly.

      Delete
    7. TL,

      Where did these people go? There's still running the Catholic church! On the day of Michael's Memorial, July 7, 2009, the POPE declared the same thing:

      http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/world/europe/08pope.html?_r=0

      You probably haven't seen that one either if you didn't see the 2011 news.

      Many of them ARE running churches and countries. They can't DO THIS without their cooperation.

      1,000 years? They don't have that long. What Bible are you reading?

      Delete
    8. Oh that wasn't from a bible Bonnie, it was from a blogsite I'd read. That's what they say on it,,,four years to get sorted and then a thousand years of peace. And I did see what happened via the church july seventh 09. What I'm saying is....they are everywhere, there are reps in every sector, church, govts, depts of all kinds and the aim was to get it all up and running at a grass roots level,,,,the little people who honestly don't seem to have a clue of what they are linked in to, from what I read. Like a whole pyramid thing I guess, those at the top and it works its way right down. Its frightening. Regarding the New AGers whole thousand yrs thing, I'm sure that that's what they believe will be ushered in. We've talked about the thousand yr thing before. You have to get rid of current religion to usher in a whole new one. I guess to them, Peace will be when there is no God worship. Even when I listen to people here in my own home town and take note of local govt changes, I can hear and see the New AGers plans being put into place and accepted. Its terrible.

      TL

      Delete
  4. Anonymous,

    Thank you for setting me strait. What was done last night has been undone and thank fully he has a sense of humor. God bless you for your advice. I'm still amazed though.

    ReplyDelete
  5. hi Bonnie!
    I was going to post my comment earlier but something came up and I didn't have to time to comment at the right moment. I have to say I'm a bit confused but also you might say happy about your last two blog entries. Please correct me if I'm wrong though:
    Quote Bonnie: What I am trying to say in the blog is that Jesus and the Archangel were the same. Not the same in the sense that they had bodies, but that same "of God" spirit.

    Quote Bonnie: Did I wonder if at one point that the Archangel Michael was Michael Joe Jackson? Yes I did. I still do. The Michael in Daniel 12:1 IS the Archangel Michael.

    Wow! I know in the past we talked about the possibility if Michael could be a messenger of God (comments section of your blog entries on february 5 and 7 of 2012). I didn't go that far to say that Michael was Jesus but that I was (and am) very open to any possibility. To me, God is almighty and there can certainly be things He would do that we don't expect or comprehend yet. To me, it seemed you were not open to that option at the time, so I'm very, very pleased to read your above quotes! Why? Because it is sooo comforting to know that Michael might be the one and I'm so exited about that!! We all know that Michael has something very very special and attracted many people who all felt the same about him: his music was great, but Michael himself was even greater. He has something inexplicable. He talked about God and Jesus many times, saying that he was NOT Jesus, but If he was, he never could have said that, because then he would have ended in a mental institution like many who actually claimed to be Jesus. Again I'm not saying Michael Is Jesus, but open to the fact that Anything is possible and I'm sensing you are beginning to feel the same. Or am I totally wrong now?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous,

      I am actually working on all this, because Michael Jackson is, well let's put it this way - I BELIEVE that he is the one who "restrained evil" until he was taken out of the way. However lets remember that the whole method behind Satan's plan is to SUCCESSFULLY CONVINCE mankind that he is the returning Christ (or the Messiah to those who don't believe Jesus was the Christ).

      There is another element in play. Satan is not running this show. There is a book that a friend of mine is sending me and I haven't read it yet of course. I never even heard of it before she told me about it, but it all ties into the whole science of propaganda and perception management.

      In war, half of the strategy is to give the enemy the PERCEPTION that they are winning. Sometimes the victor's plan cannot go forward without certain actions by their opponent that will reveal their positions and their plans. It's the same in football or any other strategic sport where deception is used to make the enemy move one way, so you can move in another.

      I have always believed that Michael Jackson . . .the REAL ONE was of God. I think he struggled also and went through horrendous torment, just as Jesus did when the devil was tempting him and the angels had to attend to him after the 40 days. I also believe Michael was THEIR GUY to collect the masses.

      You are not totally wrong. I have struggled, struggled, struggled myself with this. I can't even tell you how much I struggled. I cried, pleaded with God, please show me because given the stakes you do NOT want to be wrong. It's even worse when people are READING YOU and you have a responsibility NOT to steer them in the wrong direction. It's like having your soul shredded because you hurt because you doubt and you hurt because you doubt.

      The answers are in the Bible. That is what I was shown and that is what I am sticking to. So instead of pulling Biblical prophecy to Michael Jackson, we are going to pull Michael Jackson to Biblical prophecy. We are told to test the spirits with the name of Jesus so that is what we are going to do.

      Delete
  6. PLEASE DO NOT DISTURB....

    I am working tonight.

    For those that have not seen this:

    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr6566/text - a friend alerted me to this. It's a mass fatality plan Obama just signed.

    The next couple of blogs will be important so please give me some time.

    God bless - Love,
    Bonnie

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Bonnie, yes I mean Michael Jackson. Now I know he said he wasn't Jesus during that interview and in his Neverland statement but think about it: could he ever say it if HE WAS? O my God, they would have really torn him apart. Ofcourse the man was careful about what he was saying, but in my opinion showed occasionally a (subtle) hint, not only in interviews but also in his lyrics. About the purity of Jesus: IF, and I say IF, Michael had that same purity, would we ever going to know about it? No way. I remember a story about him that he took his own blood with him on tour because that was the only blood that he could trust (this was at the time HIV started to show up in donor blood). Ofcourse that was what the media wrote about, that he was afraid of someone else's blood, a story which Michael vehemently denied, but it could also relate to his Jehova background, which teaches one is not allowed to accept bloodtransfusions. Ofcourse this story could mean nothing, but what IF he really took his own blood with him for 'particular' reasons? Yes Bonnie I know I'm speculating here, but I'm trying to make sense out of so many things I heard or read about.

    A few days ago I posted the revelation Conrad Murray had, saying that the Holy Spirit came to him. When I saw the statement Murray did just after Michael past away, I could have sworn that I heard Michael talking (can't find it on youtube right now). Since then I kinda feel that Murray represents Michael in all of this. Remember the family couldn't get their stories straight about meeting Murray in the hospital. One was saying that Murray told Katherine Michael passed away, then later Katherine was saying she never spoke to Murray. What I'm trying to say is that I think Murray is also giving subtle hints or maybe big hints for all we know. What if he was saying that the Holy Spirit actually came to Michael, long time ago? Again....speculating, I'm sorry.
    And.....Michael J actually healed illnesses, there are many stories/reports of children about that, this is one http://www.michaeljacksontributeportrait.com/group.php?group_id=2087

    Quote bonnie: Michael the archangel - Is the ONLY ANGEL that fights Satan. I immediately thought about Michael J, fighting Mottola, who he calls 'the devil' It's a methaphore, or also a hint?

    Quote bonnie: Michael Jackson - People have a problem with this because Jesus, after all, would never dance lewdly on stage. And I can't for the life of me picture Jesus saying the word sh*t in a song.
    Oh Bonnie, you made me smile about that! When Jesus was on earth, there weren't that kind of stages at all, neither the kind of exiting up tempo music we have totday!I'm sure Jesus would make himself fit in the 21st century, to reach as many people as possible! Even if that meant he has to use the word sh*t occasionally (I'm joking!) Sandals and a long gown are not fashion anymore!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm looking at all of this, but like I said, approaching it from the foundation of the Bible TO Michael Jackson.

      As far as Michael saying "sh*t" in a song . . . Jesus cursed a fig tree. The disciples heard it. It's the one string of verses in the Bible that made me chuckle and I actually loved Jesus for that. He did it to show them something, but he still did it so your point is not lost on me. (It made me think of Jesus as cute, I don't know why).

      Stages, lights and gold pants . . . No Jesus didn't have those. But there is also another element to this in the Bible that will make THAT make a little more sense . . . you'll see. :o) Just hold your gold pants on, I'm working on it (smile)

      Delete
  8. Quote Bonnie: In war, half of the strategy is to give the enemy the PERCEPTION that they are winning. Sometimes the victor's plan cannot go forward without certain actions by their opponent that will reveal their positions and their plans.

    Yes, that's why Michael 'hoaxed' his death, to make them feel they won so he could watch them closely while they reveal their (evil) plans.

    Bonnie, I do know you've struggled,you wrote about it many times and you were close to desperate several times. That's why I told you the other day I admire you so much! Don't give up Bonnie, this is what God told you to do. Don't be afraid. We all struggle, especially the last 3,5 years. I hurted so much for Michael, I felt shame, guilt, whatever, that we were not able to protect him.
    I admire you because you care about your readers and don't be afraid you might lead us in the wrong direction,sometimes a d-tour is helpful and necessary to come to the right conclusions.
    We are with many devoted readers over here and together we'll always find the right direction again!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous,

      Your post and the anonymous just above me just cleared something up for me and you don't even know it.

      You mentioned Michael hoaxing his death. He didn't hoax it. There was no death. There is another element in the Bible, of this prophecy that we are told about. I will go over this next two blogs. But you are really, really, REALLY close.

      I am not giving up! Who told you I was? Mercies! I'm not afraid. I was but I'm not now. I told everyone I had a prayer answered. But like I said there is something else in the Bible I have not added in the last couple of blogs that will make "Michael Jackson" make sense (sorry Mike, you know what I mean). And thank you so much for your encouragement.

      Now I have to get back to work. God bless♥

      Delete
    2. Hi Bonnie! That anonymous and me are one and the same! I understand all the posting 'anonymous-ses' are really confusing! I wiil sign my future comments with 'D', okay?

      Did you have some sleep last night ;))

      'D'

      Delete
    3. D,

      Yes, I had SOME. And two dreams. One Michael was in and I can't remember exactly but we were outside. The atmosphere was one of Yes, it is getting ready to happen. Very short dream, just a feeling. I was standing next to him and this was the feeling I was getting from him. No words.

      Second dream was weird. We were on a road side on a very large ATV. Three of us were getting on. I didn't know either person. We were supposed to be preparing something but the guy who was our leader told us "get on, I'll take you for a short ride first". It was exhilarating and I was kind of scared because he was going high speed in the grasses off the side of the road. Then he veered off the road, through some trees to get to a meadow. He yelled "I'll take you to a spot I always go to".

      All three of us had a separate seat on this thing so it was big, and we had handles to hold onto. We ran the length of this field, when through some more trees on a trail and came through onto this beach. he stopped because the beach was full of people and some woman came up to him and said, "you don't belong here any more" and she pointed at him and yelled to the other partiers on the beach, "he doesn't belong here. He's one of them!" So we peeled out of there but couldn't get off the beach. Finally we got out of range of all those people and were on a deserted part of the beach. Once we were out of their range and couldn't see them anymore he stopped the vehicle. He looked rather shocked and said, "I dont' understand it. I ALWAYS go there!" and in the back of my mind, I knew it was because we were not of the world anymore.

      When I woke up this morning, that dream kind of gave me the feeling that this was telling me of the coming separation and persecution even though nothing physical was done to us.

      So, how's that for sleep?

      Delete
    4. Sounds like an exhausting night to me! But the message that you were getting in the first one is promising! Do we have to brace ourselves?
      The second one: don't know how to feel about that one yet, but I don't know that about my own dreams either :) It has been awhile fortunately, but I used to dream a lot about the end of the world (I have to say that it's some time ago), and these were rather disturbing dreams, with planets/the moon came racing to earth and all we could do was wait in fear till we got crashed. Or a big nuclair bom that blew away all live on earth in a few seconds. I can still feel the mortal agony when I saw my loved ones burn away in seconds, till the shockwave got to me.
      I hope there comes a night when I dream a good dream about Michael, that still doesn't happen to me :(

      Everything okay with your new blog entry, can't wait to read it!

      D

      Delete
  9. OH I've seen that, so work hard on it
    Bonnie. A bit more of the plan in place to remove a quarter of the people.

    TL

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hi Bonnie,

    How are you? I'm sorry to intrude on your work, as I am sure you are presently in the middle of, but I want to leave this message in the hopes that you see it asap. and by the way, yes, I am the same Diamandus from youtube haha :p I love all types of music up until the late 2000s...truly all the nowaday mainstream nonsense is ridiculous. But anyways, I wanted to show you two items of interest that may answer and spark anew some questions, and I hoping you could help me in the questions I've been having. And if you have seen and discussed these things then please let me know your thoughts, it would be greatly appreciated. :)

    First item is a painting that I am sure that you have already seen. It is called 'Archangel Michael and Devil': http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b3/Simon_Ushakov_Archangel_Mikhail_and_Devil.JPG

    The power in this painting is phenomenal whenever I see it, and the message is none other that the Lord is supreme, that his plan will come to pass, no matter what happens. Not only that, it confirms many events that take place in Revelation (I know a lot of questions will be raised). How mind boggling it is that this is a painting from the 1600s! It was painted by a man named Simon Ushakov, and I suggest you look into his other paintings whenever you have time. However I have drawn some theories from this painting.
    The first) the woman in the bottom left corner this painting is the same woman from 'the woman and the dragon' in Revelation 12. It is said that this woman would be given the 'two wings of a great eagle' where she would go to someplace out of the serpent's reach. I'm guessing the 'two wings' are a plane and the 'eagle' is America..it make sense to me, even though it sounds so simple. This would then mean that this woman does still exist, which I am sure, which brings me to my next picture.

    Michael Jackson 'Dangerous' Album cover: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Px1OYE0uWeA/TFTQbQrpf2I/AAAAAAAABAA/SUb-RwgzKhk/s1600/Dangerous+-+Michael+Jackson.jpg

    I feel there is a large connection between both this specific album cover and the painting from earlier. Do you see the child that Michael's hand is holding up? I believe this child is the same woman, and I believe that this woman will be heard about in the years to come, before the end. In essence, this painting (...from the 1600s!) kinds of falls in line with everything and 'clicks' when I look at it from this viewpoint, even from a biblical overview. But this is just what I feel in my heart. And that would mean that the Archangel Michael and Michael Jackson are indeed more closer related than thought. It is a coincidence that has puzzled me for a long time,and your blog has been helping me majorly recently. I want the chance to help you, even if in minor fashion. I want the same answers you do. However, if it is just a coincidence, then so be it, but...I just feel it's too big to be a coincidence.

    I hope this information helps. There is more to this information that I am letting forth, but if you check this blog tonight I was hoping you could respond. Thanks and God bless you! :)



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Diamandus,

      Every time I look at that album cover (Dangerous) I see stuff I haven't seen before.

      I was all over this last year and I backed away from it, vacilating between news coverage of the Estate and Michael's family and that Murray trial. Now we're back here again.

      It is amazing that the painting of the Archangel is also one that I've seen before but never noticed the woman. And the little girl on Michael's concrete, taped-fingered hand holding the animal skull . . . looks like the head of a defeated dragon, doesn't it?

      I am with you on MOST of this. But BIBLICALLY there is one thing that kind of throws a wrench in the works . . . sort of, depending on how you interpret it, and that is what I want to cover.

      Good points you brought up. The new blog should be up tonight. That will close a few more loose ends.

      My head is saying "no, this can't be." My heart is saying, "What did God tell you in August of 2009?" And THAT is something I cannot ignore.

      God must want to throw me to the curb with my indecision. I know but I'm fighting. Does that make sense?

      Delete
    2. Well thanks alot Diamandus. Because of you I am not going to get this blog up tonight. It's 2:30 here in the morning. It's all your fault. I hope you feel real guilty! LOL! (It's okay I forgive you) :o)

      Delete
  11. This is not worth opening a whole blog topic on, but my husband and I were discussing Mormons (we have the book of Mormon in our house, a friend had sent it) and I found this on their web site:

    "ven though Alma 17:14 describes the Lamanites as being a wild, ferocious, plundering, robbing, and
    murdering people, God felt the need to change their skin color to make them not enticing to the Nephites ...
    as if their immoral acts were not sufficient enough to deter the Nephites into wanting to become like
    them. It is also stated in 2 Nephi 5:23 that the Nephites would also be cursed with the dark skin if they
    married with the Lamanites.

    The Lamanite babies that were born to the dark-skinned Lamanites also had the sign of this curse.

    How black skin is not attractive to the white-skinned Nephite people is a discussion for another time." - Source,
    "http://www.ldslearning.org/book-of-mormon-curse-of-dark-skin.htm

    This "false" interpretation of the "curse of Ham" is the same stupid crap that is in the Talmud. The curse was not AGAINST Ham but against his son Caanan, who was told he would be "a servant of servants". Has NOTHING to do with black skin!

    Is this really what the Mormon church teaches? Because it is the VERY SAME LIE, just with different names attached to it - that the TALMUD has created against black people. I'm sick of this garbage! It's in here too:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamanite

    And "Laman" is not mentioned in the Bible. There IS NO ISRAEL TRIBE OF LAMANITE.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Here you go:

    And [God] had caused the cursing to come upon them, yea, even a sore cursing, because of their iniquity. For behold, they had hardened their hearts against him, that they had become like unto a flint; wherefore, as they were white, and exceedingly fair and delightsome, that they might not be enticing unto my people, the Lord God did cause a skin of blackness to come upon them. And thus saith the Lord God; I will cause that they shall be loathsome unto thy people, save they shall repent of their iniquities." (2 Nephi 5:21)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Later, the Book of Mormon records that an additional group of Lamanites converted and that "their curse was taken from them, and their skin became white like unto the Nephites… and they were numbered among the Nephites, and were called Nephites" (3 Nephi 2:15-16).

      Really? I mean REALLY???!!

      Delete
  13. High-#five brother! Somethin's going down baby . . . blood is on the dance floor, blood is on the knife . . . Suzie got your number and she stuck it to your back, seven inches in.

    Live! No Hoax. Models on the runway all atwitter.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous,

    I will. I know, thank you. God bless you

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pththt! Sorry! I know you heard me the first time :o)

      Delete
  15. Hi, Bonnie...another great blog! I'm anxious to start on the one you just completed, but wanted to post this link. Remember the flurry of articles that circulated last week claiming Janet delayed Michael's burial until the family repaid her $40K Forest Lawn deposit? That was a despicable piece of slander printed in Vanity Fair, which was subsequently posted by several other news outlets. Janet's lawyer, Blair Brown wasted no time shooting off a letter to VF demanding a full retraction of the lie.

    I sense something nasty is brewing with the timing of this latest piece of tabloid garbage against the Jackson family, who is once again the target of the corrupt media. They chewed on Michael's neck for decades, but they just can't seem to lose their thirst for Jackson blood!

    http://www.janetjackson.com/story/news/letter-from-blair-brown-to-graydon-carter-of-vanity-fair

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for posting that Spotlight (should I call you spot for short, LOL!)

      You're right. They are gearing up for more persecution of that family. Anything to keep people's heads turned from what THEY did and are doing!

      They've really been after Janet lately. They must have found out that she's not "under control" anymore.

      John Branca is not a man . . . throwing stones to hide your hands.

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.