Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: I Never Heard This Is It

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Saturday, November 17, 2012

I Never Heard This Is It

Trauma Gershwin
Clues from Michael Jackson

"Take heed to yourselves, that your heart be not deceived, and ye turn aside, and serve other gods, and worship them;  17 And then the Lord's wrath be kindled against you, and he shut up the heaven, that there be no rain, and that the land yield not her fruit; and lest ye perish quickly from off the good land which the Lord giveth you."

Thriller – And No one’s gonna save you
From the beast about to strike
You’re outta time . . .
There ain’t no second chance against
The thing before your eyes, girl . . .
The dead start to walk in their masquerade
Their’s no escaping the jaws of the alien this time
It’s the end of your life . . .

They’re out to get you
There’s demons closing in on every side
They will possess you
Unless you change that number on your dial…

Now is the time
For you and I to cuddle close together (you and Christ)
All through the night (tribulation)
I’ll save you from the terror on the screen
I’ll make you SEE . . .”

(When you get done reading this blog, please read most recent post on "Seven Seals" blog)

While I am awaiting some further instruction “from above”, I thought I would touch on some issues in the world concerning Michael and the clues that have been put out by a few of the “inner” circle.  Seems some have been upset by a few of them so perhaps we could stand back and take another look at what is going on.

We are also getting a little slammed here at home, and I think I have handled it pretty well, but it’s really tough watching my husband suffer.  We had the emergency with my mother tearing her eyes and the day before I come home my husband’s mom goes into the hospital with a heart attack (she’s still there as of the writing of this), and my husband is being persecuted at work.  It’s gotten to the point where I’ve had to block a couple of people from my Facebook page since I believe my blog has a lot to do with some of the things going on.  If it angers them that much perhaps they could just not read it and pay more attention to their own responsibilities before misplaced trust takes a big chunk out of their profits.  Unless of course that has been their goal all along . . .

I believe I am justified in my suspicions where that is concerned because of the reactions back when I started this from various people we USED to be close to.  Talk about taking the skin off the onion, you really begin to see what people are made of . . . and yourself as well.

I’m no longer bitter about these things, I kind of half expected the persecution and this is only the beginning.  It’s harder watching someone you love go through it knowing they can’t just sit outside the situation and view everything as you do.  It hurts and it makes you angry and the only thing that keeps you from feeding that anger is the knowledge that God doesn’t look too kindly upon oppressors and that their day of reckoning is coming.

If they can see nothing else through the games they are playing, I pray they would wake up and remember who God is and what wants to see in them before it’s too late.

Back to the issues at hand, I wanted to update you on some of the MJ news out there and put out some theories to discuss on the motives behind some of this news.

Whether you believe that Michael is one with God, an angel or just a genius (I wouldn’t turn my nose up at any of those offerings), it helps to remember most of all Michael’s message, which most certainly cradled evidence of all of the above.

A New Book on Michael

The book “Untouchable” was brought to my attention by someone who emails me on a regular basis and this person was understandably very upset.

In all honesty I can say from my own point of view that I’m getting a little tired of constant books published about Michael, by people who have never met him.  And the trash written by people that have met him but didn’t know him.

You don’t have to buy a book about Michael to learn about who he is.  All you have to do is watch him speak in interviews, read his writings and poems, and listen to his songs.  His songs tell you the story albeit in parables.  It was the only way he could get his story out unmolested by his label, the press and those manipulators with a whole conspiracy to hide.

In the books that I HAVE read about Michael “posthumously” published (Jermaine Jackson’s book, Latoya Jackson’s book, Karen Moriarty’s, Gloria Rhodes Berlin and others), much of the content was rehashed rumor and second/third hand information even from the family BUT . . . there was always some clues hidden underneath all that.  (Yes, even as angry as I was initially reading books I thought for sure would spell it all out, front and center . . . nope!)

I have not read the book “Untouchable” by Mr. Sullivan.  I have read the reviews of it from both ABC News and the New York Times.  The NYTimes review was not very flattering and most probably gave an inaccurate portrayal of what was in the book.  I say this because of the specific quotes from the book that were commented on and HOW they were spun.

If you read either review, you want to NOT like Sullivan; just because he was a journalist with Rolling Stone - Just because he was a journalist, period.  But if anyone has been following this blog and Michael’s story long enough, you know we have learned that you cannot get any truth out about Michael without it having a negative slant to it, because it won’t get promoted by the media.

The New York times article excerpt below revealed an observation of Sullivan’s that we have kicked around on this blog before:

Of all the answers one might offer to the central question hanging over the memory of Michael Jackson,” Mr. Sullivan asserts, “the one best supported by the evidence was that he had died as a 50-year-old virgin, never having had sexual intercourse with any man, woman or child, in a special state of loneliness that was a large part of what made him unique as an artist and so unhappy as a human being.”

Mr. Sullivan, however, does not present any persuasive evidence regarding this assertion. What’s more, he leans heavily, throughout this book, on his “tremendously helpful” source Tom Mesereau, the lawyer who in 2005 helped win Jackson an acquittal on all charges in another child-molesting case. Remarkably enough, Mr. Sullivan ends this book’s last chapter with the suggestion that you might even grant Jackson “the wish that he isn’t sleeping alone tonight.” - Source,

Michael – pure in thought, pure in intentions, pure in behavior.   This isn’t evident in some of his dance moves, but in his lyrics and in his off-stage personality – the REAL Michael was in an innocent place.  If he was abused through MK Ultra/Monarch training he effectively learned to block it off to do what he was called to do.  “Compartmentalized” was a word heavily used during the Murray trial and on Karen Moriarty’s book, “Defending a King”.

Why no one ever questions the attacks on Michael for being an innocent while people like Roman Polanski and Geffen can continue getting away with being slimeballs with honors should jolt most out of their anesthetic slumber as to what is going on in the world.

The New York Times article also states that Sullivan leans ‘heavily’ on source Tom Mesereau.  Karen Moriarty also stated the very same in her book.  Her two sources were two of the bodyguards from 2008 employment with Michael (2006 through 2008) and Mesereau.  Would Mesereau lend his name and time to a book of lies about Michael?  And if so, why?

Below is an except from the ABCNews writeup:

"You're relying on sources and in Michael Jackson's universe you have to bear in mind, there is no one with truly clean hands," Sullivan said. "So you're talking to people that always someone, some people have accused of this or that or who has this is or that issue. That was Michael Jackson's world." - Source,

That’s about as honest an assertion on a person’s own work as I have seen.   Like I told the person who sent these to me in email – The one big piece of information I have seen from this that is new, and no one else has claimed is that Michael was a virgin.  That reminds me of this:

3 And they sung as it were a new song before the throne, and before the four beasts, and the elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth.

4 These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb.

5 And in their mouth was found no guile: for they are without fault before the throne of God.

Can Michael be a “firstfruits” of God and still be the Archangel Michael?  Yes, as these are also “one with God” as Jesus requested in the Garden of Gethsemane during his prayer in our behalf.  “Sons of God” like it says in John 1 –

"But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:"

Through your own persecution, be it financial, spiritual, personal or professional, if you remember nothing else, remember who is behind you and how little time the oppressors have left in power.

Remember Michael’s persecution and the reason for it.  They didn’t go after Michael because he was guilty.  They didn’t go after Christ because he was sinful.  If these two were any such thing, they would have been heroes, protected in this world by the elite. 

Michael’s “HIStory” is all throughout the Bible.  Look at how many roles Michael Jackson the entertainer, played in just the one film “Ghosts”.

Could it have been clues as to what was coming?  Michael plays an innocent loner, the oppressor, the beast, the demon (skeleton) and the possessed oppressor and the giant before he comes back as himself.  How much of the full story and where it all falls in the grand scheme, who knows?

Jermaine, Sun of Jack?

I wasn’t sure what to make of this one!  A story ran in TMZ that went something like this: 

"Jermaine Jackson has filed a request to legally CHANGE his last name ... trading out "Jackson" for "Jacksun" ... TMZ has learned.

Jermaine filed a petition for a change of name with L.A. County Superior Court yesterday asking for the change in nomenclature.

In the docs, Jermaine says he wants to make the change for "artistic reasons" ... but he does not give any further details about the move." – Source, TMZ

And apparently this story was big enough to be covered also by Huffington Post, Daily Mail UK, and yes, even Fox News!

Micheline sent me this below on her thoughts of this in an email, in part below:

I want to share what I'm thinking right now about the latest attacks on Jermaine for wanting to change one letter in his name.  It all seems so predictable, that these fans groups would rear their ugly heads again and attack one of the Jacksons.  I know there's more to this story than meets the eye.  If you Google Jermaine, you'll see that it's being covered by every news outlet, not just a few obscure sites that no one takes seriously, but a whole list of news links.  And basically, all articles are the same in terms of how they write about the petition, including the quote given by Jermaine's ghostwriter, Steve Dennis.  For one thing, why would Jermaine need his ghost writer to speak to the media on his behalf?  He's not Jermaine's publicist. But more intriguing is the quote given to the media by Steve Dennis:

"It is something he has chosen to do, and it's fair to say that you cannot blame this one on the boogie, you've got to blame it on the SUNSHINE,"
 Dennis was coining the lyric to "Blame it on the Boogie."

Don't you sense a deliberate clue in there by Jermaine?  There was no reason to preface his petition as needing to blame it on anything!  It's as if the "boogie song" was meant to be used for the sole purpose of paying attention to the last part only - you've got to blame it on theSUNSHINE.  The letters S-U-N are significant in changing Jermaine's name, but I believe it has more significance with Michael, I just feel it.  

Are there any references to the sun in Michael's song lyrics or the Bible that might give us an idea as to why Jermaine is doing this?  For a mature man in his late 50's, I can't imagine why he would want to distance himself from his iconic family name by changing the spelling, when the world associates the name Jackson with Michael's creative genius, and a family dynasty of people who are incredibly talented.  

I can answer her questions in her last paragraph.  Michael songs referencing “sun” or “sunshine” would include:

“You are my life” with  - “you are the sun (son?), you make me shine, more like the stars that twinkle at night . . .”

Then we have  of course, “Blame it On the  Boogie” and those lyrics are above.

“Thriller” sports the lyrics “Wonder if you’ll ever see the sun (son?)”

“Earth Song” – “What about all the peace that you pledged your only son (sun?)”

Ain’t No Sunshine”, “For All Time”, Hold My Hand” all have song lyrics that reference the Sun.

The sun is also the morning star so I included some of those verses too.

Bible verses -

"And he dreamed yet another dream, and told it his brethren, and said, Behold, I have dreamed a dream more; and, behold, the sun and the moon and the eleven stars made obeisance to me."  (The eleven stars are Jacob’s/Israel’s sons, Joseph the youngest had the dream, he being the 12th of the sons of Israel)

"The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and terrible day of the LORD come."

"Thy sun shall no more go down; neither shall thy moon withdraw itself: for the LORD shall be thine everlasting light, and the days of thy mourning shall be ended."

There is also this one in reference to being “worshipped” as a sun-god:

"And he brought me into the inner court of the LORD's house, and, behold, at the door of the temple of the LORD, between the porch and the altar, were about five and twenty men, with their backs toward the temple of the LORD, and their faces toward the east; and they worshipped the sun toward the east."

Here the “morning star” is referenced and in 2 Peter 1:19 below, the “rising in your hearts” refers to Christ.

2 Peter 1:19
We also have the prophetic message as something completely reliable, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts.

24 But unto you I say, and unto the rest in Thyatira, as many as have not this doctrine, and which have not known the depths of Satan, as they speak; I will put upon you none other burden.  25 But that which ye have already hold fast till I come.  26 And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:

27 And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father. 28 And I will give him the morning star. 29 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.

Revelation 22:16
I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.”

I'm not sure what his "Jacksun" is supposed to imply but that was the first thought I had too (You are my life and I listened to that on the drive).

In the Bible, Christ is the "Bright and morning star"  The morning star is the sun.  However, Lucifer is also described as the morning star, but it is worded differently.

"How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!:"

According to Job 38:7, ALL the angels are morning stars.

Job 38:7
while the morning stars sang together and all the angels shouted for joy?

2 Peter 1:19
We also have the prophetic message as something completely reliable, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts.

Micheline, maybe ALL the Jacksons are angels?  "The morning star rises in your hearts"?  That is Christ/God.

Revelation 22:16
I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.

So that is if we are talking about the SUN as the MORNING STAR, Just what Jermaine’s intentions (or the intentions of the press/industry) on this provides an intriguing distraction.  But I found what Steven Dennis said a bit more interesting:

Now take what Steve Dennis said - You can't blame it on the Boogie, you've got to blame it on the "Sunshine" - So we can blame this on Christ, the "bright and morning star"?

Perhaps he told Jermaine to change his name . . . just so the "clue" could get out there, but just what is it a clue TO?

One more little issue and then we can pound on this in the comments.

This Is It – Somebody Lyin’

We’ve posted the information about “This Is It” the song before.  The story is, Paul Anka and Michael Jackson supposedly worked on this song (wrote it and recorded it) back in 1983.  I absolutely disagree with this because listening to the song, the vocals on Michael sound like a more mature voice (except for the “one – two – three – four” at the beginning).

Micheline sent me videos of an interview Paul Anka did explaining where this song came from, how the Executors of Michael’s estate found it and I want to post this below:

Paul Anka “Setting the Record Straight”?

Description below the video reads:

This segment aired Monday, Oct 26th, 2009.

I NEVER HEARD / Anka, Jackson

Type of Work: Music
Registration Number / Date: PAu000533333 / 1983-08-08
Title: I Never Heard / Anka, Jackson.
Description: 1 p.
Notes: Lead sheet.
Copyright Claimant: Mijac Music & Paulanne Music, Inc.
Date of Creation: 1980
Authorship on Application: words & music: Michael Joe Jackson & Paul Anka.
Names: Jackson, Michael Joe; Anka, Paul; Mijac Music; Paulanne Music, Inc.

- 0:58 – We’re not even a minute into this interview and already I see a problem with it.  They got things “hashed out” with the Jackson estate.  This video was uploaded on October 26, 2009.  This segment aired on Monday, October 26, 2009, two days before the release of the documentary in theaters.  Wikipedia says that Columbia purchased the rights to the rehearsal footage from AEG on August 10, 2009 (Columbia Pictures is owned by Sony Entertainment).  From Past resources, Mijac was not even a publishing company yet in 1980, which is supposedly the “date of creation”.  We can also argue that “This is It” was the concert name before Sony had their grubby little mitts on it, but by the date of this interview, Sony had the rights to the footage.

- 1:30 – Anka says Michael came to him in 1980 or 81 to work on Paul Anka’s album.  (With Kenny Loggins and Michael McDonald and others).

- 2:16 they play the “original” recording which sounds the same but with different instrumentals to which Paul Anka responds “this is the original” that they played for the movie version.

- 2:45 Anka agrees “It was called “Never Heard” when we wrote it”.   Anka says what you hear is that they did a nice job embellishing the original recording, adding some rhythm and strings but it’s the same “track” same vocals and same “piano”.

- 3:05 Behar asks why Anka didn’t use it before and he responds that Michael “didn’t finish the project” and he didn’t have the rights to use it on any of the albums. (remember this).

- 3:12 Anka says that a “few days ago” (from October 26, 2009?) that “fans” called the press saying that the newly released “This is It” was not a new song that it was an old one, saying it sounds like the song “I Never Heard” (remember this too).

- 3:33, Anka says he listened to both versions (doesn’t he know his own songs?) and got a record by a girl named “Safire”, he played the two records, and Anka said “This is It” is “I Never Heard”.  (again, doesn’t he know his own songs?)

- 4:36, Barbara Walters asks how Michael got these missing tapes.  Paul Anka tries to explain that during these “sessions” with Michael, Thriller was coming out, and that he didn’t know if it was Michael or those around him, but they “illegally” took the tapes out of the studio.  Anka says here that he was angry about it, it almost went “legal” and that the tapes were returned amicably but that Michael must have “copied” the tapes.

- 5:12 – Anka continues to try and convince us that Michael “kept” this original track (copy) all these years, and the people digging around his bedroom after his death FOUND this “original track” (copy) thinking it was a new song.

- 6:00, Elizabeth asks if Anka had ever spoke with Michael after the tapes had been returned (did they talk about this before the airing of the View?).  Paul Anka responds with this: “Well a few years later I was in a lawyers office and one of the attorneys came in and said “Michael Jackson’s next door, he wants to meet you”.

I’m going to stop there because it is almost the end of the segment and I have a lot of ground to cover.

So let me get this straight - According to Paul Anka, he and Michael Jackson wrote a song and recorded a demo in 1980 or 1981 that they both had copyrighted to Paul Anka’s catalog and the Mijac catalog which at that time did not yet exist.   And even though the estate executors contacted Anka first about the mixup (according to Anka on this interview), nothing was brought up about the fact that AEG had named a concert by the same song before Sony was even involved.

On top of that, Anka could not finish the project and put it on his album because he did not have rights to publish it from Michael’s half ownership, yet a girl named “Safire” recorded it in the 1990’s and he knew nothing about it, which brings up another issue.

Safire recorded Paul Anka/Michael Jackson’s song “This is It” as “I Never Heard” which is what Anka himself says the song originally was titled.  However the lyrics on “Safire’s version” is a lot different than “Michael’s version”, even though he supposedly recorded it ten years before Safire did. (??? Huh?)

Then Paul Anka says he has to hear both versions to recognize they are the same song?  Again, how did Safire get a song recorded in the 1990’s that Paul couldn’t even record and it was HIS SONG???  And why are the words to the 1990’s version different with the same title, but the allegedly OLDER song recorded with the NEW Title matching a Concert in 2009 Titled “This is It”?

Michael “allegedly” (or someone around him) took the tapes out of the recording studio (sometime between 1980 and 1983), and Michael copied them before his people were told to return them (I took Anka a LOOOOOONG time to realize they were missing!) and even though personal notes were found in storage and auctioned off THIS TWENTY-NINE YEAR OLD RECORDING was carried around by Michael, possibly with PLANS to have it accidentally found by Branca’s death bed raiders and used in a documentary that was SUPPOSED to be only a concert by the same name.

And the kicker???  Sometime after Anka spent all this time recording with Michael (between 1980 and 1983!) realized the tapes were gone, threatened legal action, had the tapes RETURNED and was told a few years later in another lawyers office that Michael was in the next room and “wanted to meet him” . . . just to apologize for taking the tapes (with a grin) and I guess Michael forgot to mention the “Safire” thing? LOL!

Either Branca is really stretching to cover the PURPOSE of this song or Paul Anka is playing double agent.  In either case he’s a really bad liar.  But since this “The View” interview was back in 2009 just a couple days before the release of the Estate’s windfall documentary, I’m going to assume the Estate and Sony put him up to it.

What Safire had to say about this

According to her, both Michael and Paul approved her to do the song.  I don’t know if you hear her voice in this but the girl sounds NERVOUS.  And if Paul and Michael approved her, and her LABEL gave her the song to do as Paul and Michael sought her out to do it, they why wouldn’t Paul Anka remember this?  This video was uploaded on November 16, 2009.  I guess Paul had more time to rehearse his lines but I’m not buying any of this . . . it doesn’t make sense.  Nobody’s stories are matching up and Paul Anka is trying to sell us on a recording that was made MUCH LATER than 1980 or 1983.

Ironically “Freestyle” web sites that list her albums do not list a copyright or author of this song “I Never Heard”.  On Safire’s “Wikipedia” page there is not one mention of the song “I never Heard” even though it was supposed to be on the 1991 album “I Wasn’t Born Yesterday”.  The Wiki on this album is classified a “stub” and was last modified on November 7, 2012.

You would think that a song handed to her label by Michael Jackson and Paul Anka with the request for her to record it would have been PROMOTED to get her airplay, but not one doggone thing on her Wiki page.  The credits are not even listed on the original album nor are the lyrics.  Weird, huh?  Everything about “I Never Heard” including her videos on Youtube singing this song are all “uploaded” or written about post June 25, 2009. 

These people are LIARS and they have a lot to hide . . . a whole conspiracy, and of course Michael’s message and who he really is.

New Lawsuit

By the way, a lawsuit has been filed by a “Michael Jonzun” (a play on Johnson?) over the same song, claiming he wrote it and that Michael’s brothers did the background vocals.  – Source,

Michael Jonzun.  Okay.  I did a search.  I found him too!  Just what exactly he is, I don’t know.  1980’s?  Never heard of him.  Never saw him on MTV.

Michael Jonzun and the Jonzun Crew

Rock-Rock-Rock Me Amadeus
In Librace’s Vegas!
Source, Gold Crush

And I found a video of theirs . . . from 1983 (same year Paul Anka “lost” This is It!), on T.V. . . . in GERMANY.

Pack Jam
(Yeah, that’s the name of the song)

I wasn’t sure what to expect after seeing that picture at the top of the web page (the yellow Amadeus one), but when I played the video, I had to cover my mouth to keep from waking my husband from the laughter.  It was a belly laugh I hadn’t had in a couple of weeks! (Usually my husband causes those!)  I couldn’t believe what I was seeing (hearing?).  This is worse than Kuba Ka and his “Paw-paw-pawty in the streets of freeeedom” with his upper lip curl and his horrendous dance moves.

Streets of Fruitloops – I mean “Freedom”

I will end here on a light note.  I have more serious things to cover, and I want to talk next . . . about Jacob – Jacques – Jack – son and a very, VERY interesting story in Genesis.  You’re gonna love this.

Oh yeah, and the title of this blog?  Trauma Gershwin?  It sounded familiar  possibly because of the reference to a vial of blood taken from Michael Jackson on June 25, 2009 after he died?

From Day 14 of the Conrad Murray Trial

- Trauma Gershwin vial of blood drawn on 6/25 @ 1330 hours
                           But Michael is not declared dead until 14:26.  Fleak and Winters
                           Were not there yet to draw this blood. Fleak testified they drew
                           The blood.  Coroners were there at 1:30pm?

Trauma Gershwin Blood Taken almost an hour before he’s pronounced dead by a coroner’s assistant who supposedly wasn’t even called to the hospital yet.

Trauma Gershwin Toe Tag

George Gershwin died of a brain tumor shortly after surgery at the age of 38 on July 11, 1937.  He died “intestate” and his estate passed to his mother.

I still do not know the significance of this “blood vial” named Trauma Gershwin.  I didn’t find anything catching my eye yet, but all I could think about was “head wound”.

Maybe Jacob will know . . .

I have more on the Bible, but I need a little more time.  It's about the Delusion . . (When you get done reading this blog, please read most recent post on "Seven Sealsblog)


  1. Anonymous,

    I did see your comment, LOL! Gif!

  2. Anonymous,

    I got you . . . P.G. I'm on it. Researching....

  3. Hmm..Your Husband persecuted at work : that is not good but he too is in my prayers even if it seems a weak comfort for now. Your husband seems to be such a good man. He deserves nothing of this. Mobbing at work can bear on someone health & self-esteem if own spiritual strength & family support are not strong enough to overcome the bad. At least both of you are tight friends & I hope this helps your husband these days.

    Michael "virgin" : no one has any proof sofar even if O. Winfrey dared asking him once. The only scoop Sullivan launched to profile himself towards other writers ? To Sullivan : Leave Michael alone. Such a great book that Mr. Mesereau is again a trophy reference in it ? Sullivan allegedly also wrote in his book that La Toya Jackson was with her boyfriend in Michael's residence after 06.25.2009 to remove out of the mansion lots of cash in bags.

    If he did write all such things about Michael's supposed intimate life or La Toya's alledged actions, Sullivan writes indeed dirty laundry about celebrities & dares publishing things not even proved. BTW Raymone Bain also published a book on Michael :

    The Las Vegas 3 guards's sincerity during their interviews I personally believe more as they also described Michael's bad days with worries & loneliness then. No, I will not waste any money by buying such books even if I agree with you Bonnie, sometimes they may however give us clues, though nothing compared to Michael own words, songs & lyrics.

    1. Hi Line,

      Thank you for the prayers for my husband. No, he doesn't deserve it. Not sure how God wants us to handle it. It's still America even though it's being squished from both sides. My husband is a very talented man. He can troubleshoot and fix anything from small engines to refurbishing houses and planning a landscape design. He doesn't need to be doing what he's doing but at 50 years old he feels he has no other options. Sucks. He does too. I think it has more to do with being beaten down for the last three years by somebody who buys his "godliness" from the pastor of the latest church he's joined. But that's just bitterness talking. Who knows what the truth is. God. He's the one who makes those calls.

      Michael/virgin - we are NEVER going to have "proof" of that. What would be proof? Is Michael going to give us a medical report? Nope and I wouldn't ask for one. I believe he is an innocent. I don't really care what anyone wants to paint him as. Jesus never turned over a physical exam to the public either and I believe he was pure because the Bible says he was and that is the ONLY truth in this world. Everything else is manipulated perceptions.

      Mr. Mesereau is a lawyer. Surely if these people (Moriarty, Sullivan) accessed his name or claimed to have council from him Mesereau would set the record straight if he disagreed? He's not in Michael's position. As a matter of fact the Sony clan absolutely adore him.

      If Latoya removed bags of cash out of the mansion good for her. Better the family then Branca having it. This was also rumor passed around before Sullivan's book, and I know Sullivan has plenty of that in there . . . ALL those writing about Michael had passed around rumors in their books INCLUDING THE JACKSONS. So we can't necessarily judge him on that basis alone. I have not read Sullivan's book so the only thing I have to go by is the articles about it.

      Bain already published the book? I thought it wasn't coming out until 2013? I don't intend on purchasing either of them either. I believe Michael's "3 bodyguards" in his employ between 2006 and 2008 DID write a book, but under Moriarty's name. It has the same Title they were planning to use and she admits working with them before disagreements parted them. I will stick to Michael's songs, the Bible and Michaels veiled interviews and speeches.

      I'm not trying to sound short so I'm sorry if I do in the above paragraphs. I'm just trying to decompress after this past week. Not working :-\

  4. Hi Bonnie,

    When I saw the interview with the author who has written the newest book about Michael, I couldn't believe what I was hearing. After almost 3 1/2 years, they still won't leave this precious man alone. They are still "feeding" on him...anything to taint his memory and "sell". What Michael did, or didn't do, in the privacy of his own bedroom, is HIS business and his business alone.When Oprah interviewed him at his home at Neverland Ranch, she asked him if he was a virgin, he replied that he was a gentleman, and that means he didn't kiss and tell. There has to be some areas in his life that are off limits, no matter how much we love him...out of respect for his privacy. When you really love and care about a person,their happiness means everything to you, and you will protect them with every ounce of your being. My heart longs to protect him, and the only way I know to do that,is to commit him to God and I know that in the arms of God...he is safe, and loved.
    I wish there was some way for him to know how much I love,and respect him. Maybe He does:)
    There is coming a day when all the injustice committed against mankind will be avenged, and because God is longsuffering and patient, not willing for ANY to perish, the door is still open...He is still waiting for that last one to come, and then that door will be closed. If only the world could grasp just how much He loves them."The Savior is waiting to enter your heart, why won't you let him come in. There's nothing in this world, to keep you apart,what is your answer to Him? Time after time, He has waited before, and now He is waiting again. To see if you're willing to open the door, Oh, how He wants to come in."

    God bless you, Bonnie, as you serve Him this day, and may all your needs be met and God be your strength and your provider. May you be surrounded by His presence, and enveloped in His love...blessed by His peace:)

    In His Love and mine,


    1. Hi MLY,

      Yes, I do agree with that and with what you said about the author. I also agree with what you said about Michael's answer to Oprah on the question of his virginity. Do they have a right to ask? No they don't. Do they have a right to talk about it? No. Not in my view. And my opinion on that matter stated is above, however, even the BIBLE talks about the virginity of the 144,000 who didn't "defile" themselves with women. It also talks about Rachel "selling" her husband to her sister Leah for narcotics (mandrakes/hallucinegens) and in the Bible we know who did what to whom and they use the term "go into" to describe "lying with". The Bible felt it important for us to know this.

      I'm not defending Sullivan in any way, shape or form. I was simply explaining how certain information has had to be layered in publications. That doesn't mean I excuse the fact that they felt it necessary to write a book. I got upset about Latoya's book and Jermaine's, and just last night I gave Michael Bush my opinion on his book about his Luciferian creations. (I didn't go looking for him, his comment just happened to show up on my facebook news feed where he threatened to delete "haters" - of lies I guess - So I 'outted' myself).

      I haven't read Sullivan's book, so I don't know the extent of the garbage in it. I DID feel it was ironic that the very News Source that had Michael condemned for pedophilia back in the 1990's through 2005 chose to hightlight Sullivan's comments about Michael being an "innocent". However I do agree with you that it is Michael's business.

      I believe Michael knows how much you love him. I know this because I feel that back in return. I also feel when I do something where I give in to weaknesses (anger for example) and I feel that disappointment. It's weird, you feel like a little child does when they cry because they know they've disappointed a parent :o(

      MLY, I wish someday I would get to meet you. Your countenance face to face must be something to behold. Do you remember Michael's quote about Angels not being able to reach people when they're angry? How smart that man is . . .

      God bless you MLY - Michael Loves You too. Another acronym fitting your initials. :o)

    2. Hi Bonnie,

      You said: "I believe Michael knows how much you love him". When I read this, I felt such a warmth flow over me, and tears began to stream down my face, and I thanked God for that confirmation from His heart, through your's, to mine.
      I thought about it all evening.I can't share Michael with
      my husband. He doesn't understand him or appreciate his tremendous talent and gift, so it was just me and God, and thanking Him for what He has shown me because of Michael. I also thanked God for You, because you are on a journey to find the truth, and I am blessed that you are sharing that journey with me. With each new revelation that God leads you to, He opens my heart a little more, so that I can wrap my heart and mind around it.

      I think it would be neat to meet you too. God knows the desires of our hearts, so... maybe someday we will:) Yes...I do remember Michael's quote. I think that we would be surprised to realize how many times God sends his messengers of truth to encourage us, to protect us,and minister to our hearts when we need it the most.

      I love the acronym:) What a lovely thought:)

      God Bless your day my you have blessed mine:)

      In His love and mine,


    3. Hi MLY,

      I am blessed to be on this journey, even oh-so painful as it sometimes is. When I get that twist in my heart it always reminds me of the lyrics to "Be Not Always" . . . "Faces, have you seen their faces . . . did they touch you . . . have you felt such pain . . ."

      I am honored with that burden and I don't deserve it, and I am so sorry to God for so many failures in carrying the things I had asked for.

      There was an incident when my youngest son was about three years old. We went to Pittsburg to visit my ex's parents and we took the kids to Kennywood. We went through a haunted house which my oldest (six years old) loved. It wasn't terribly scary. It had dinasaurs and things like that, but it was dark in places, and had strobe type lights and things would jump out at you whenever feet weighed down on certain sections of the floor.

      we all had to hold hands (the rules) as we walked through so we couldn't carry either of the children (my youngest was still three, not yet four and advanced for his age). My youngest was holding onto my ex's hand and somehow they got separated. Because it was dark, my ex had to feel is way back through against the "traffic" of people until he came to our son, crouched in a corner with his hands hugging his knees around his chest.

      My ex went to pick him up and my baby clung to him, then proceeded to bury his teeth into his shoulder. It was a nervous "don't leave me again" reaction not meant to hurt but something you do when you're traumatized and I sometimes feel like that when I see the things that are going on in the world that no one else wants to admit goes on. Just like a child. I hope God understands that it is just a recoil and not a refusal. I just have to steel myself sometimes and I hold back awaiting his help.

      Thank you MLY - God be with you and protect you. ♥

  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    1. Hi Serenity,

      Why is it that everyone coming from the Hoax forums has to include doubts about "statements" in the Bible or "Bible has too many versions" etc.... Why doesn't anyone every attack or question the integrity of Kabbalah or Qu'ran or the Talmud? Just asking.

      Do you know WHICH 'statements' in the Bible that "Sportin' Life" was talking about? I've searched out several sources but no elaboration on this (and I've never seen the musical).

      I might also point out that Gershwin was Ukrainian Jew (parents from Ukraine) and everyone you've mentioned above that Gershwin was "best friends" or "godfather" of are also Jewish ("...tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

      Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.") - JFK, April 1961 Speech to Newspapers Publishers of America.

      So what exactly do you believe could have been the reason for Michael's reference to "Trauma Gershwin"? Or was it Michael's reference at all? Perhaps a signal to other Zionists?

    2. Serenity,

      Serenity said - "Anyways, I will stop reading your blog or to help you in any way. I have my own path to follow."

      I'm sorry if you feel you have to go. The "help" I've received from you once every three or four months or whenever it suits you has been invaluable. Really, I don't know where you find the time.

      I'm also aware that you didn't write Porgy and Bess. Two Jewish Zionists did and as loved as that musical is, the song "Ain't Necessarily So" is a direct and devisive undermining of the Bible -

      "t ain't necessarily so
      It ain't necessarily so
      Dey tell all you chillun de debble's a villain
      But 'taint necessarily so

      To get into Hebben don' snap for a sebben
      Live clean, don' have no fault
      Oh I takes de gospel whenever it's pos'ble
      But wid a grain of salt"

      Which is why I responded to your comment the way I did.

      It's also abundantly obvious that whenever I ask a question about the motives of a post, I get the same "I'm packing my bags and not helping you any more" wounded victim responses.

      I don't believe the "Trauma Gershwin" had anything to do with "Michael" trying to hint around that the Bible is not truth - Unless of course we are talking about Michael JOSEPH, the fake getting ready to jump out of the cake and claim he's God.

      I'm wise the the agenda. The next time you want to convince people that you are going to stop "helping" someone, try to make an effort to post more than quarterly so people have half an opportunity to believe you.

  6. Hi Bonnie,
    I'm wishing I could connect with you somehow. Still wondering if you got my two posts, one with more clarification on the translation of Morphine and the other about Wagener's efforts. Is there any way you could post something on this day's post (Sat Nov 17) just to tell me whether you got them?
    I really appreciate seeing Can You Feel It on today's post, and your diligent effort to ferret out the truth, and your love for Jesus.
    - "Trusting God"

    1. Dear Trusting God,

      I deleted the post on Wagener. I posted it, then answered it then deleted it, believing that you would have received the reply in your email (I don't want Wagener's links posted here at this time until more info comes out).

      The translation to Morphine. I have already translated Morphine and since I don't know who you are, and since you are not the only one to offer an opinion on Morphine I don't know which post on which of the 670 pages on this blog is yours. I'm not trying to be obtuse but I can't chase down everybody's posts, I would never have time to research. WHEN and WHERE did you post about Morphine and I might be able to narrow it down from there.

      Thank you in advance,

      God bless, Bonnie


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.