Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Attackers of the Holy Bible When I'm Too "Close"

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Attackers of the Holy Bible When I'm Too "Close"

Michael Maitreya Part II
Demonic Intentions

"And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.   13. These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast."

I remember like yesterday the 2nd to the last conversation I ever had with Taaj Malik.  She had called me to tell me she was getting ready to go to Vegas.  The homeless chicks who called themselves followers (of Michael – stalkers) were paying her way.  But before she told me that she was trying to sway me that Randy Jackson was bad.  That he had stolen from Michael, his brother and she brought up the Transitional/Prescient transactions. (My research on this here).

Before I knew what she was, I told her why I believed Michael was alive.  The silence on the other end of the phone was tangible.  I could have chipped it off in mid-air with my fingers.  Finally in a cold voice laced with what I could only describe as loathing she responded "No!  No, he's gone!"

That was my very first "black" feeling I felt deep in my stomach that there was a lot more to this then a publishing catalog and an estate.

Any of the 2010 blogs where I research AEG couldn’t possibly have been guilty are interesting in that you can see who the proponents for Sony were and how important it was for them (in their assigned task) to Get the words “AEG” and “Guilty” together in their posts.  This blog title is one of many.  Just look at the names.

Even though it looks as if all these fan groups, characters, handlers, doctors, recording executives, journalists, concert companies are all battling each other, this is organized chaos.  All of it is building up to something.

This is Not It” group still has their own facebook which was dormant for a while, but is now back actively bashing the Jackson family.  This group had website and costly news releases and major network interviews READY TO GO the minute they announced Michael died.  Their website’s legalese was written a month ahead of time.  Talk about efficient . . . and psychic!

In Part I, We talked about the coming together not only of time lines from different aspects of this “conspiracy against God”, from the Michael community to the esoteric community to the Bible, but also of the coming together of the far flung people involved in this.  Truly of “one mind” with the beast.

I have before talked about AEG being a “bridge”, back in 2010, when this lawsuit first surfaced.  That this lawsuit was going to bring a lot of “truth” to light.  However am not discounting this:

" Then said he, Knowest thou wherefore I come unto thee? and now will I return to fight with the prince of Persia: and when I am gone forth, lo, the prince of Grecia shall come.   21. But I will shew thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince."

I have thought about the fact that back in 2009, a Christmas party was held at Nokia Theater (owned by AEG) and that the children Prince, Paris and Blanket attended a Christmas Party there with Randy Phillips.

If these are indeed NOT Michael’s children (biologically) I doubt Sony would let the children go in the care of AEG if they weren’t working together. 

If the children are biologically Michael’s (and there is no evidence of this whatsoever), then Michael should have perhaps done more of the raising of his children and not left it to his handlers – because Paris and her behavior and dress are NOT reflective of Michael or his values OR his immaculate dress.  Children of the tares?  Michael’s face on the cover of OK’ Magazine with a pregnant Debbie Rowe says yes.

Michael and Debbie Rowe

Only one adult smiling . . . Because Debbie Got Paid
to Become a Test-Tube Mom with Klein - but with Michael's Money

We mentioned one of my new Twitter followers “Gol_gotha” and their apparent excitement about the May/June “dawn rising” this year.  We also paired this up with some of Michael’s song lyrics in relation to Heaven and “coming” or returning (“Heaven can wait”, “I Just Can’t Stop Loving”, “Break of Dawn”) and the 4-year increments in Michael’s life, from the 1993 WTC garage bombing, to 1997 Blood on the Dance Floor Album cover, to 2001 WTC destruction, the 2005 MJ trial ending in June, the 2009 “Illusion” of the murder and the 2013 - ???

Now let’s go back in time just a bit – back to Alice Bailey whom we’ve covered before.  This is the woman who wrote in her book “The rein of Christ must end”.  And through the spirit she “channeled” (DJwal Khul), she was making predictions into the 21st century.  Some of them may even sound familiar:

Alice Bailey wrote that Djwal Khul’s intention was the revelation of esoteric teachings that were valuable for the continued training and teaching of spiritual aspirants in the 20th and 21st century.

She believed her work was done on behalf of the “Spiritual Hierarchy” of advanced beings, that included Djwal Khul, whose sole interest was to guide humanity towards the establishing of goodwill and Right Human Relations, the vital first steps that would help prepare the way for the reappearance of “the Christ” (called by Theosophists as “the Maitreya”).

Alice Bailey’s 24 books with DK were to be the second in a series of three revelations, after Blavatski’s secret doctrine, that were meant to present the preparatory teachings that would serve to “Usher in the New Age”.

They knew they would be pulling all this into the 21st century to finalize their plans.  They couldn’t do this without the Christian population, which is why “Dispensationalism”, “Pre-millennialism” and the Pre-tribulation Rapture doctrine was developed.  Convince them the first guy is THE Christ!

Unfortunately, most Christians rarely even open their Bible’s during services let alone take active part in independent study.  Most Pastor’s are taught by Jesuit founded schools, so even study in church can be twisted.  This is why God intended the individual to seek God through prayer and through HIS Word.  Jesus taught the personal relationship, and so did his apostles.  So did others that were crucified for that very thing, throughout time.

In the blog I did on the “One People’s Trust” – yes, we have some networking, and if you dig, you will find connections through the U.N., and some camaflouge through U.N. programs locally implemented.

Their Mantra

 On that blog entry I copied some of their organization’s objectives:

"Don’t think of it as an overthrow, think of it as the recovery of stolen property. The actions of the One People’s Public Trust essentially reclaim what is ours, as sovereign beings of this planet. Universal Law, Common Law and the UCC are now the governing law of the planet." - Source,Project.nsearch

"The UCC is the “bible” of commerce; it precisely dictates the manner in which international trade and commerceshould be enacted. In fact, the entire commercial system pivots around UCC law. If your mortgage is foreclosed on or your car is repossessed, the bank uses the UCC process to do so." - Source, Project.nsearch 

I did a search on the alleged UCC filings of this group, and none of the numbers exist.  UCC’s are filed by state, so I checked SEVERAL of the usual, including New York which is where you would expect these were filed.  None of the documents on “WakeupWorld” even name a state these were filed.  They want you to believe that there is a “universal” filing that is good in every state, in every country and every province.  And if you are unfamiliar with U.S. law and the sovereignty of states (as it stands now and as it was when these were allegedly filed), you might believe this bullsh** story.

This doesn’t mean that they aren’t a viable group being used to sucker people, but it does reveal that there isn’t much substance to their court claims.

They also have on their website that the Uniform Commercial Code is the “bible of commerce”.  While that may be true, it doesn’t mean this is a good thing.  The U.C.C. is exactly what has been used to enslave you.  Your birth certificates, marriage and death certificates, driver’s licenses, property deeds are ALL pieces of paper that says the “state” owns YOU and YOUR PROPERTY and YOUR CHILDREN, so anyone claiming the U.C.C. is your salvation, run the other direction.

This is what Wikipedia says that U.C.C. is:

"The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC or the Code), first published in 1952, is one of a number of uniform acts that have been promulgated in conjunction with efforts to harmonize the law of sales and other commercial transactions in all 50 states within the United States of America." - Source, Wikipedia

U.C.C. replaced common law and favors merchants.  It essentially incorporates the United States of America and it’s “assets” – including human resources.  It began drafting in 1942, just in time for the Federal Reserve Act to step in and benefit from ownership of . . . well, YOU.  If you have a birth certificate and a social security number, you are traded on the stock market.

This is what it actually is:

The UCC Connection to Admiralty/Maritime Law – Every state has enacted this as law except Louisiana.  Therefore, if you ever go to court over any debt whatsoever, and you notice the flag on the courtroom has maritime fringe on it (you can request common law court if you have not hired a lawyer) or, you can invoke their own section 3-501 of their UCC:

So you say, just innocently like a lamb,

Well, I didn't know that I got involved with an international maritime contract, so, in good faith, I deny that such a contract exists. If this court is taking jurisdiction in Admiralty, then, pursuant to section 3-501 of your UCC, (Presentment), the prosecutor will have no difficulty placing the [alleged] contract into evidence, so that I may examine and [possibly] challenge the validity of the contract.” – Source above.

I did a search on the U.C.C. and the Illuminati and on the first search results on Google I found another promotion of the “One People’s Public Trust”. 

On that site I found another copy of the UCC filing and saw it listed with Washington D.C.  so to settle my mind on this, I did a search for the doc number with D.C. UCC filings for that year.

Doc copy

Other networked sites promoting this:

The language in these documents and on the web sites should throw up enough red flags, even if not true, only because they are yet another networked group out there to ensnare people in the lie.

"You now share a lawfully binding Trust with your Creator; one which forbids any interjection of another Being, not just as a rule – but because an unobstructed relationship between Being and Creator is the true nature of Creation.

Lawfully speaking, until your Creator – as a party to the Trust – arrives on Earth to make a specific claim on you, you are on your own recognisance to DO and BE as you choose, as a sovereign Being of equal standing.

And the CVAC (Creator’s Value Assest Centres) governance framework will assist us do to that." - Source,

Now let's take a look at the crux of this thing. Because right now, this is being done completely under the wire, meaning everything else in the world going on right now (Obama's lies and false flags, Eric Holder's gun grab and "Fast and Furious" scandal, Bengazi-gate, Michael Jackson and the AEG Lawsuit, Paris' behavior . . . all of it), is covering this "wolf in sheep’s clothing".

As the world turns, they are still organizing and networking.  The offer thus far is only being promoted in the "reptillian" believer's circles - David Icke and Wilcock/Fulford forums and those esoterically committed.

But there is some craftily worded language in this and by the time the fairy dust hits the fan, this is going to look like a good deal:

How can I be bonded to the One People’s Public Trust without my express consent?” - Source, Nexusilluminati

(read this carefully)

"Any filing with the UCC that remains unrebutted stands as law. Claims made via the UCC – including the creation of Trusts – do not require expressed consent to validate them, they require rebuttal to invalidate them. UCC process requires that filings are publicly disclosed, and if left unrebutted, the filings become law.

It’s the same process used by (former) banks to foreclosure on mortgages; they made a claim of default which – left unrebutted – allowed them to seek the remedies of foreclosure and repossession against you." - Source, Nexusilluminati

So what does this mean?

"Similarly, this series of filings made by the OPPT stand unrebutted. So the Trust is ratified and all Beings of the Creator are lawfully bonded to it. The only difference this time is that the rules were used to foreclose the system, not to protect the system.

That’s how the system works." - Source, Nexusilluminati...

In other words, he “causes all small and great, rich and poor, free and bond to receive a mark . . . ?”  Unless you “OPPT-Out”???

"And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.

16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name."

They go on to talk about free will - But what this is, is an opportunity to "OPPT-IN" to the same slavery system.  It is the same Babylonian money system with a clever bait-n-switch.

I was ready to chalk this up to yet another distraction, but for the language of these websites, and the states and countries in which these sites are popping up increase every time I go back to visit this subject.  Take a look at what this says in the lanaguage posted above:

" . . . Lawfully speaking, until your Creator – as a party to the Trust – arrives on Earth to make a specific claim on you, you are on your own recognizance . . ."

Arrives on Earth, it says - which fits this quite nicely into the whole "alien/fallen angel" deception.  Just as the Bible predicts in Daniel, Matthew, 2 Thessalonians and Revelation.

Just as I predicted, using a premature event, in this blog topic back in 2011 on the “Angel of Light”.  We’ll come back to this later.  It’s all about the deception.

And this blog, while semi-intelligently arguing against the integrity of this “One People’s Trust”, essentially VALIDATES them by giving them ‘plausible deniability’.  Here we have “Illuminati” arguing against “Illuminati”.  No different that Erin Jacobs vs. Taaj Malik or liberals vs. conservatives.  It’s another straw dog.  It could also be a solid plan behind the mirage – a test that turns into the real thing, like many of our false flag “exercises” in the last ten years. The infrastructure is quietly and unbelievably being put in place.  So many will say “I can’t believe it’s not butter” – only to find out that it is.

Propagandizing the “Bloodline”

Now the interesting part of this (we’ll get back to angels and aliens later) – I was doing a search on “bloodlines” of the fallen angels, and if there were any references to this outside the Bible and the children of the tares:

But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.

26. But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also.  27.  So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? from whence then hath it tares?   28.  He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?"

30.  Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.

38.  The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one;

40.  As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.”

If you rely on Tarot cards, numerology and the other sorceries available to trick you into believing you can tell you future on your own power, then you are all on board in what is about to come.  You believe the Bible copied the “ancients” and that our “angels” are aliens from other worlds.  You believe in duality, yin and yang, karma and that sin only exists in our minds.

The concept of time continuums controlled by an omnipotent God, who can stretch it out as he stretches out the Heavens is believable to you, EXCEPT where the Bible and it’s prophets are concerned.

Understanding that your “angels” of the “Pleiades” are actually demons who can only enter different points in time through “windows” or “markers” in time would probably have a hard time understanding the tactics of the one you believe will bring peace – the one who will arrive before the Son of Man.   Your “ascended masters” are nothing more than children of the abominable bloodline.  Their “secret mystery schools” are nothing more than misused knowledge they bestowed on their abominable children, stolen from the true Creator of everything, including them.

Yesterday we also talked about the “children” of the tares.  They existed back in Jesus’ time and they exist today.  You want to know why all the U.S. Presidents except one are related to one another, who are in turn related to royalty in Europe – that is one reason.

The “Illuminati” – the “Illuminated ones”.  Those who have taken God’s word, twisted it’s meaning, hidden the power and truth of it for their own gain.  Those who were taught the secrets in Genesis 6 on how to take what God created, corrupted them into abominations, disrupting the natural order and perfection of the Book of the law in all creation.

This is exactly what they did to Michael Jackson – God’s servant who’s soul the devil waited to devour.  Who’s visage and form were marred beyond recognition of who he was and who’s sanctuary was polluted.  The temple of his body was desecrated.

The symbolizing of the affliction of Michael Jackson, summarized in the destruction of twin buildings in the new Babylon, which they have replaced with the “new species”:

Twin Towers



Superman - 1st Beast

2nd Beast/False Prophet

Angel/human hybrid

The Beast who will proclaim himself “creator god” and will stand “in the temple” in the “seat of God” shewing himself “as God”.

"Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God."

One of many “propaganda” preparatory pieces.  The underlying message is unmistakable.

On the video below at approximately 16:00 minutes, Hoggard discusses the “mysteries” we are being “taught” through subliminal messages within books, movies, commercials, music – gaming, the whole entertainment industry.

He brings up the “DaVinci Code” by Dan Brown as it being the first book that really put him out there.  In the DaVinci Code, it teaches that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married and that she was pregnant with Jesus’ child when he was crucified on the cross – beginning this “bloodline” that they want you to believe is . . . THEM.  The “Illuminated” ones.

Jump to 17 minutes and he takes you through one example in a Jeep commercial.

@17 minutes Jeep Commercial – Legendary Bloodline

If you want to watch the rest, or even through to the next couple of minutes, Hoggard breaks down the “secret doctrine” they are teaching you, which he admits, is not so secret anymore.

2012 Olympics – The Angels of the bottomless Pit

Superbowl January 2012
Birth of the Maitreya/Messiah

Superbowl January 2013
The Breaking of the water

Pet Goat II

The Weather Channel?
Alien Hybrid skeletons?

No, it’s no secret, and you know, it’s funny because when I was doing a search on this “bloodline of the fallen angels”, one of the sites I pulled up with this one.  And it spoke specifically about Michael Jackson.

This blogger was describing Michael as a “god” in the film “Remember the Time” and for the most part, I agreed with the interpretation of the film, except that “Horus” is “Jesus/Messiah”.

"Michael has the falcon on his chest which represents Horus (Jesus/Messiah) . . . So we have Michael portraying Horus trying to lure Nefertari/Nefertiti away from Set (Ramses II). The Messiah trying to get this woman out of Satan's grasp. He is suggesting that she remember a time when only One God was worshipped and the true royal bloodline held the throne."

Let’s get this straight – Horus IS Satan.  So is Ra, so is Set, so is Ashtoreth, so is Moloch, so is Buddha, so is Remphan – all the sun god representations and offshoots are Satan.  They are the divisive creations to distract, divide and confuse.

I thought this was rather psycho, considering further up on the same blog entry, she went through genealogy, claiming that Jesus was a made up figure.

"; this bloodline also connects to Herod the Great, the "Herod" of the Jesus stories, and continues to the Roman Piso family who, as I explain in The Biggest Secret, wrote the Gospel stories and invented the mythical figure called Jesus!!; the same bloodline includes Constantine the Great, the Roman Emperor who, in 325AD, turned Christianity, based on his ancestors' stories, into the religion we know today . . ."

When I showed this to a friend, she asked me, “do you know who this is?”  I said “no” and she replied, “SerenityXDreams . . . the same girl that was spamming you with comments that you were interpreting the Bible wrong . . .”

ROFL!!!  So, this chick who tried choking me with “Strong’s Concordance” definitions and claiming I had it all wrong DOESN’T EVEN BELIEVE JESUS IS REAL, hence, neither is the Bible according to her own blog!

This folks, is how demons in flesh work.  By HER OWN WORDS, Michael is representing a “mythical figure” that doesn’t even exist.  You may want to ask her just what the point of her whole blog post was.  That Michael’s whole video was pointless?

I had deleted most of her comments because they were lengthy and meant to entangle me in references that would have taken me the next month to verify had I not already DONE my research on the backgrounds of the different versions of the Holy Bible. 

This comment thread was the end of the line on my blog where I made my point about her esoteric intentions. She deleted both comments, but that’s okay.  We know who she is and what she’s about now.

It’s the same Serenity, should she try to back out (same backdrop on her Twitter as on her blog) I did take screens hots.  The “MJJJUsticeProject” follows her (another I had to block) as well as a few other industry people.  She in turn follows most of the “gang” that I’ve also blocked from my twitter, including the MJ Estate, Ivy, mimibelievemj, June (who used to post here), Linda, Sandra, Wendy, Jennyapplehead (the other Mimi’s tour guide), etc… It’s the same people.


It’s pretty demonic to come to someone’s blog, spam the daylights (literally) out of their comments, twisting God’s Word to try to convince you that you are interpreting a book wrong that they don’t even believe.  My reply to her post which is no longer there is here.  You can tell by my reply that she questioned the Bible, then later tries to lecture me on it.

The blog topic on which she did this (then deleted her comments that I linked):

Anyone have any clues as to why she would post upwards of 9 lengthy, reference ridden posts about a Bible she believes is fiction in the first place, knowing I was deleting them before they appeared?

If you were me, would you think that this would be indicative of someone who perhaps thought you were getting too close to the truth?

These people are dangerous.  They very much have leverage in keeping you at best, confused, at worst, signed into their Luciferian agenda.

In truth, when I see things like this, it guts me.  Because you don’t know how much I want to be wrong.  What they did to this man, to Michael to try to get him changed, to get him converted.  They had the body, they wanted his soul.

And the “beast that was, is not yet is” Is Michael, but is not.

"The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is."

I have a couple more things to throw at you, probably tomorrow.  In the meantime, I seek God in protecting this work with the powerful blood of Jesus Christ, my savior and Lord whom I love with all my heart, mind, soul and strength.

Good night and God bless you all.


  1. Rely on God, not self - that is the best message I've gotten today. The other best message I've gotten . . . Get some sleep :o)

    1. "Rely on God, not self" true true
      Have a good sleep :-)


  2. (part 1 of my comment)

    That was a powerful article. Silvi writing here...

    That reminds me about the experience I had yesterday on the letsrollforums. Few years back, after some user saw, I no longer can truthfully participate in the David Icke forums (because I started to see, DI is a shill, they monitored me and saw I have problems with DI-admins) the user invited me to the letsrollforums. I let them create an account for me and I maybe wrote 5 times there then afterwards only reading about 2 years without writing. When the Boston Bombing occured I started reading their stuff and decided to go back into writing. After 5 postings, some admin, who I really dont know, started to go on spree in the chat, you only see, when you are logged in and giving concerns, that he believes there are 4-5 trolls on the forum right now, destroying the Boston Bombing research thread. I immidiately thought that he means me with this, and I tried to figure out, if my posts (which maybe were 4 in pieces) may be wrong or i broke rules or so. I didnt saw any faults from my site and started to add 2 new researches and suggestions to the Boston Bombing stuff. To make it short. This certain admin started now to directly confront me, saying I was spamming. I then answered that I really can not relate to his problem and pointing to the new 2 discoveries I added to the thread and I wont go into argue with him and rather leave the forum, because of the paranoia that every user is a CIA shill and that I wont participate in this and leave them alone and rather not sharing information with them, because of the bad gut feeling he gives me.

    You know Bonnie, they recruite the Users from the David Icke forum and start to discipline them, when in real, you really havent started to show a behaviour. Now coming to what you wrote. After I wrote a brief message to the user who recruited me, that I want immidiately the account deleted, I started to research the revesere way. I do this everytime when I think something is rotten, starting usually doing: "xyz exposed". So I found out the letsrollforums is strongly related to cluesforum, which are the guys who did immense expose on 9/11 and No-Plane theory (CGI work). I then read that they were in immense fight together, and I started figuring out, the initiator from the letsrollforums is still posting on the DI forum. I remember him as a grounded writing guy. But I found out, he is not nice to the guys who really are only interested in real hard evidence on 9/11. Point short. Letsrollforums is presenting stuff, and do not credit the original researcher. They twist and even invent things. Same for Taaj Malik.

  3. (part 2 of my comment)

    Even some people from the cluesforum suggested the letsrollforums have ties to Tavistock and all this, you already covered.
    Now coming to the beast that was, is not yet is in relation to CGI work: the TV. In Boston and on 9/11. The No-Plane CGI work theory has it really hard. But I have no problem to make my mind about it. They needed the planes to make it look like a terrorist attack, when in real, they only bombed the 2 towers, because they needed them removed for whatever reason (agenda, insurance, etc.). Thats not a hard thing to figure out. Remember when the people ball their eyes out when they would figure out there was no visible attack seen and the towers crash for no reasons. The planes had to be added for the world. Its when a lie becomes truth. A beast that is but is not. (just the CGI-interpretation :-) ) An illusion that is there but is not really. But harms the minds.

    Someone said, it is easy to figure the no-plane theory out. Just remember when you were a kid and someone did a magic trick to you and you strongly believed it was real, until someone comes and says this is all a hoax and you scream, no its true, until someone shows you the real exact steps how the hoax was done and then you start to see. The same stuff is now going on in Boston, they did not trick us with planes, but with gore and the actors thingy. I saw from day 1 on, that the Boston stuff is a social experiment in the Internet. So much stuff does not add up in relation to photos and videos.

    So the stuff that is going on in the MJ communities, even going so far, you have direct contact to the shills (telephone, emails, DMs, etc.), is the same stuff that is going on in other forums, always having to do, to manipulate true hearts, who do not want to harm but finding out truths. I am starting to see, that the Internet was never free. We are in a social experiment from the beginning. They do us monitor everywhere, it depends on the level of exposing. And I believe you are also in the front row, Bonnie, when it comes to religious views. You even told me, how they do it. But you are protected. God bless you and your family and everyone on here, seeing what is going on. But I suggest, to not fall into the poison that every human being, who comments, is a devil. I know God said do not trust men, but he gave us also tools how to recognize each other. Man can sharpen man. It is a long road, hard work and requires self-control. As long as we do not lose the common thread, I believe truthful communication is possible in the Internet. I believe in the first internet rule: Behind every computer is a human being.

    Have a nice day & Love

    1. Silvi,

      Interesting comment (both parts) :o) If it weren't for the visitors from David Icke's forums I would not even know it existed. That is how I first found them - their url was in my stats as visiting the blog. And I believe there are good people on that blog, misled people on the blog and of course, the ones who operate the rudders of the conversation there. It is the same for people that visit this blog.

      You said:

      "You even told me, how they do it. But you are protected. God bless you and your family and everyone on here, seeing what is going on. But I suggest, to not fall into the poison that every human being, who comments, is a devil. I know God said do not trust men, but he gave us also tools how to recognize each other. Man can sharpen man. It is a long road, hard work and requires self-control. As long as we do not lose the common thread, I believe truthful communication is possible in the Internet. I believe in the first internet rule: Behind every computer is a human being."

      This is true. And a human being is all I accuse anyone of being before they make their intensions obvious. When they make their intentions obvious, I am obligated to point them out, because it is not just me they are deceiving.

      2 John 1:7
      For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.

      John 8:44
      Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

      What would you have me do then? The stakes are only going to get higher. If a person who believes Jesus is a "myth" comes here to call me the liar and tie up my time in twisted scripture in a book she doesn't even believe - according to scripture she is an antichrist. I agree with what you said about self control, but I don't agree that it requires me to be silent when deceivers seek to contort God's Word for their demonic purposes.

      Ephesians 5:11
      "11 And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them."

      Colossians 2:8
      See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ."

      Social experiments are fine as long as we remember we are individuals and not beholden to anyone's rules but God's.

      With that said, judging and exposing liars are two different things, but I do keep in mind what you said. My concern is the souls of other "computer" users who come here to read and are more susceptible to the deceit than I am. Exposing these people also helps others beware when they see these things posted elsewhere on the net.

  4. To the UCC, i have found a video by Jordan Maxwell. Fair notice, he is a shill also, but either way, the Birth Certificate info is interesting:

    I am trying to figure out, how this works out in Germany. Heard so much similiar stuff in the past years but under different names/disguises. And everything relates to UN. I only find ufo alien german websites on the One Peoples Public trust (same like you showed above), trying to research the next days, if there are websites "off-alien". Seen many german people commenting, they are already suspicious of this stuff. The only things I remember, when it comes to "new laws", "new business" and "rejection of lawyers" (like Breivik did in the Norway trial and already shows up a little bit in the National Socialist Underground trial here in Germany) are Nazi related topics. I never saw them mention UCC. I only saw them handling with international laws that led up to Cold War links etc. lets see if I can find the dots for the germans. Thx for bringing this up again and linking it to the Mark of the Beast. This is disturbing stuff. It is as if they implemented a system within a system within a system, and it unfolds through the years. But we are still trapped in the same BS...

    America related: a german website suggested a guy named Shane Bennett who tries to make the OPPT documents become real for his own house foreclosure. Maybe you can handle this stuff on the right way, I didnt look up if you already discussed this. So sorry, if I repeat:


    1. Jordan Maxwell - shill (I agree)

      UCC I believe is U.N. adopted as a method of developing a global law, considering that the concept of UCC was not only a "U.S." concept. It had it's roots elsewhere.

      Trapped in the same B.S. - LOL Good way of looking at it.

      I personally don't know anyone that has successfully used the UCC to wipe out their debt. I have heard though, of people who have used the UCC and knowledge of their straw man to use their "corporate" worth to pay off their debt (using the money they are traded with on the stock market). Much of it is fable that I see written of this on the internet. It can be done, but you better know your stuff. One improper phrasing can relinquish your rights under common law and you're right back in Admiralty court.

  5. Hi, i think this guy made a nice attempt to explain what OPPT can cause...

    I understand it the same way. It seems it is not as big Now, but if this is somehow Elite's stuff than it's easy to figure out, that it needs "events" to "oppt-in" everyone. And then we are, how I would call it: outlawed, like animals. As far as I can recall, they used the term "NGO=Non Governmental Organization". I think I somehow commented on the same stuff. I do not want to go you on your nerves, lol. You are on the right track. In Germany it is more washed. Brainwashed as I would call it.

    I have seen similiar "OPPT" events in Germany. Mostly these "outlawed" were put down by the government and ridiculed. Of what i researched later, that it was not that bad to put these people down. But maybe this was all a show, to bring the next step in. Because the people they tried to put down, were not people I would trust, at least the initiators of various groups. They printed own drivers licenses, etc. I assume this has to do with OPPT. But they got in jail for that. Now I found on german sites the very same persons, that tricked persons few years ago with the same agenda, but now using OPPT. I can't take this BS anymore. Lots of them caused harm to honest people and they lost credibility and a whole lot of money. I assume, they will rise more and more on various websites. When they will find all the OPPT stuff, is a matter of time. Please Lord, do not let them fall in, let them learn your commandments!

    This stuff is so mentally ill, i got a headache from this. I wish everyone a nice weekend. Still ready again to stay away from news and internet and enjoying time with friends. Hope you guys do too. Sometimes we need a rest from the evil. Sorry for "spamming" today :-)


    1. Mentally ill, LOL! I agree.

      They governments very well could be "false flagging" OPPT and putting "these people down" because they just aren't ready for a full blown revelation yet - and also to give them more credibility (get their name in the news).

      There is a group in South Carolina that is tied to the Liberitarians, and these people are working in deceit to take over the Republican Party. I found my way into one of their local forums and this is what they are conspiring to do. I believe this is how the communists are infiltrating both parties and turning them at the local level, which will bleed upward. The funny thing about it is, most of them are young and stupid - and their tactics are so obvious that they can't get any of their people voted in and they are getting angry about it. It's almost funny to watch.

      Just this past weekend in my state, they had a vote on delegates. The local Liberitarians were there in packs, nominating their people and not one of them got in. So they left in a huff. They put out "anonymous Republican" face book comments against other Republicans. The pattern is very much what we see in the MJ community which makes it really easy for me to see. And thankfully others are starting to see this as well.

  6. Interesting headline, right? Just a quick mention of it in the beginning of the article. Hmmmmm...

    1 4 3,

    1. Hi E,

      That headline is probably the only sliver of truth in that whole article, LOL! I remember that a lot of "credits" added to the IMDB were added by SONY, not AEG. A lot of "This Is It" are additions made AFTER Sony bought the rights and tampered with the footage (and added some of their own).

      They mention that costume fitting where Michael looked gaunt, LOL! That's the same "picture" that I told Samantha Degosson was a mannequin. She cursed me off her facebook page, LOL! Same trash being brought up.

      Don't you wonder why the Murray trial with all the gruesome (and fake) autopsy pictures was televised but a civil trial was denied t.v. access? It's so transparent.

      Thanks for the link. God bless you too.

    2. Quote from article:

      "Sankey said she was standing next to Ortega at a rehearsal the next afternoon when Randy Phillips called to tell him Jackson was dead.
      "Kenny collapsed in our arms," she said."

      No accounting for creativity, this is what Karen Faye said SHE did in Ortega's arms. Geeze.

    3. E,

      One more reply - take a look at this:

      This list has GROWN exponentially since we first saw it back in 2009. What are they doing, making this up as they go along?

  7. Bonnie,

    I know we're not fans of TMZ but I just read something on my facebook about something that happened today at the trial and I'm dumbfounded. Here's the link to TMZ's story:

    What in the world is going on???


  8. Bonnie,

    Another story from MTV:


    1. Deb,

      Thank you for the links . . . what in the world is going on? Keep watching. And remember the media and the fact that we don't have access to this with our own eyeballs and ears.

  9. I read those articles on Facebook about Wade Robson and I too am dumbfounded. It's ridiculous!!!!! He testified for Michael at his trial and said under oath that Michael had never done anything to him and now after Michael has been gone fr almost 4 years and while this trial is going on he suddenly remembers?

    Wade Robson is hurting for money.....AEG paid him....and I also saw on Facebook that there could be others coming forward.

    I knew this trial was going to get ugly....fasten your seat belts. We are in for quite a ride.


    1. Trish,

      AEG paid Robson? Really? Do you have inside information on this? That's quite a jump considering AEG doesn't even know this guy. Robson was involved in the 1993 allegations . . . Bet Branca would know him.

    2. Someone paid him because this is ridiculous...Why would he suddenly come forward with this after all these years? And he has always spoken nicely about Michael. Robson testified for Michael at the trial. He swore under oath that nothing ever happened. This makes me mad. What is going on?


    3. I agree with you Bonnie, Branca would know him. That guy is in for the money, now that Michael is "gone". I wonder if he realises that he perjured himself when he testified in the trial - he can't have it both ways. The guy is lying. When will people stop making money off Michael!

      This may be off topic but Paris is really starting to worry me now. She is rebelling against Katherine and now the latest articl I read is that she is going to go and live with Debbie Rowe!! She said apparently that Katherine is old fashioned and wants her brothers to join her. I don't know if this is true, but that's what the media is putting out. I noticed quite a few of the comments were on her side saying that she needs to get away from that psycho Jackson family and live a normal life.. I don't know if she can leave legally, doesn't she have to be 18???? Katherine is her legal guardian. I saw a couple of photos of her lately where she is doing the illuminati sign.....I am really worried. I wonder if we are going to find out who her father is...I really don't believe it is Michael.

    4. Bonnie

      SerenityDream used to post on one of the hoax forums. She was always putting out videos about Egypt. I believe she was asked to leave at some point. I am sure it is the same person.

    5. Also Paris Jackson is fed up of the Jehovah's Witnesses. I hope she becomes a Baptist. It worries me that Paris is going against Katherine'#s wishes and against Michael's wishes.

    6. I don't think it matters what church Paris goes to. All of them have been infiltrated to some degree. At least there are individuals in these denominations that do actually read and study the Bible on their own.

      I would also be careful with what is quoted in the media with what any of the Jacksons or these children say. We have Paris doubles out there too, even posted on her Twitpic's. We also know Twitter accounts are spoofed/hacked, so try not to let any of that and what is said sidetrack you from what is really going on.

      What the media is reporting, what Justice4some, Cadeflaw and Vindicating Michael are putting out in the way of court transcripts are coming from the estate. AEG is not handing these things out and both Katherine's lawyers are paid for and work for the estate, so consider these facts when you read the garbage that is out there.

    7. Beryl,

      There is nothing legal or REAL about what is going on in this. As far as I'm concerned Paris and Debbie Rowe deserve each other. She's not Michael's real daughter and all this has done is given access to Michael's estate through these children who's father is listed as "Michael Joseph" not "Michael Joe". Michael JOE is Michael's legal name.

      I don't really care at this point who Paris chooses to live with and I hope AEG proves that they are not biologically Michael's children even though that in itself is irrelevant to what happened to Michael.

      This is a Sony production - even the lawsuit. Remember that and everything will make sense.

    8. Trish,

      He works in the industry - he does what he is told (on Robson). Sony is paying him or rather the element that controls Sony (Susie). You are aware that both of Katherine's lawyers are Estate paid right? Katherine HAS no representation, hence the filing of the lawsuit and the information in the media . . . all controlled by Branca and Sony.

    9. Hi Bonnie,

      It's FG. I am very disturbed by this new set of allegations by Robson. 'Why now?' is of course the obvious question, but we must remember that just because this is being made public now, does not mean that he spoke up about it 'now'. This, like everything else, will have followed a trail and as the media would have us believe, a nervous breakdown (first reported to have happened in 2011, later changed to 2012) led to visits to a psychotherapist/psychiatrist which then led to these 'repressed memories' coming to the surface. From there it went to the lawyers and as far as I can tell (sorry, I'm typing here based on memory of the various reports I've read) the claim against the estate was made on May 1. This supposedly sealed filing was leaked to TMZ (them again? Say no more! ) after which, Robson's lawyer, in addition to calling Michael a 'monster' (irony, much?) reveals that this abuse was not one or two isolated incidents of repressed memories but that the surfaced memories reveal abuse over a seven year period from when Robson was 7 years old to 14. Okay. I need to make clear that when someone speaks out about abuse, I have to hear them out, not least because abuse of any kind is very serious. Michael doesn't get a free pass just because he's Michael. And this is not someone who made allegationas at or around the time it is supposed to have occurred. This is someone whose sworn testimony was crucial to Michael's defense in 2005 and whose entire career has been made off of his association with Michael. People are saying that it's a money grab because he's broke but it is a very risky and extreme way to go about making money (although anything is possible) because anyone with the connections he had to Michael has unlimited other ways of making money than to choose this route. Remember he has a family as well. Not just a wife and son, I believe, but also his mother and sister were vehement in their defense of Michael in 2005. To be proven a liar would be career suicide for him. He had to have known that but still went ahead. Why?

      To me this is about much more than money. There are, in my opinion only a few things that would make anyone risk so much and do such a public about turn and accuse someone of such a heinous crime in this manner: either they are telling the truth, they BELIEVE they are telling the truth, or someone has them over a barrel and the choice is 'you do/say this or else' and the 'or else' option is worse than the route they have taken. cont

    10. Here are the red flags for me: The psychiatrist 'helping' him uncover memories of seven years of abuse. I am no expert in repressed memory syndrome but something feels off about this to me. I was molested between the ages of seven and 13 and to cope, I compartemenatalized so well that no one guessed that I was anything but a normal, well adjusted child, teen and adult. People would have described me as happy-go-lucky, positive, always smiling etc and I interacted with my abusers as though nothing was amiss – for years. To cut a long story short, one of them died before I was brave enough to confront him but the other I did not confront at all until 25 years AFTER the abuse stopped. The trigger for me was when my own daughter turned 12, which was the year that the abuse was the worst and for some reason, I took more responsibility for it then. It was easy to say 'it wasn't my fault' at 7 but for some reason, when I was 12/13 I felt it was my fault and that I could have and should have stopped it. When my daughter turned 12 I looked at how young she was and how innocent and I realised that I had been robbed and that I had been carrying this false shame and guilt for so many years. That was the trigger but let me tell you that the trigger was just the START of my meltdown. From that day to my total healing has taken EIGHT YEARS and that is WITH Christ in my life. He did not allow me to break down completely as He healed me but it was still a hard journey and over many many years – not 12 months. Yes I had suppressed the truth about what happened to me for many years BUT even though I compartmentalised it, I did not forget it. I always knew it had happened, I knew when, where, what was going on, who was in the house, which rooms, how it started, what happened, how old I was. Actually I did tell, when I was 7, but nothing was done about it. In later years I chose not to tell because I was too ashamed. When I did finally speak up I was married and I know that a lot of people had a hard time believing me mostly because I had never shown any 'signs' and had interacted freely with my abusers. (I did that because of shame and later because I thought if I have forgiven them it's the right thing to do. The abuse was never mentioned, ever.) Although they never said they disbelieved me, their actions spoke otherwise. What has endured down through the years is the truth. My story has never wavered because it is true. What I have always sought is freedom and wholeness and never vengeance which I have left to God. cont

    11. What I have a hard time with in this case is the repressed memory aspect. I think if he was telling us this happened when he was 0-5 (I'm thinking Brice Taylor style trauma) then he would have known no different and it would make sense that to cope he would have blocked off every single memory. But that isn't the case here, 7 years old, while young, is still old enough to remember, even if you block it off somewhere so you don't have to deal with it on a day to day basis you still know it's there. What you feel, when you interact with your abuser, beneath everything else is a huge layer of shame. It's one thing to speak in glowing terms about your abuser but to do it under oath, 'knowing' that you've been abused and in a case where your abuser is on trial for doing the same thing to others… I can't get my head around it. This has distressed me so much. Also, I would imagine that the memories, if repressed would surely come back in flashbacks, bit by bit over a longer period of time than 12 months, if we are to believe that Robson had absolutely no memory of this happening until his breakdown in 2012. In that length of time, he has had therapy and ALL of the memories have surfaced, such as he is coherent enough to gather lawyers and sue the estate? I know everyone is different but my memories were not repressed, only suppressed and even with that it took years before I was able to make enough sense of it to accept that it wasn't my fault and that the responsibility lay squarely at the feet of the abusers, never mind even contemplating suing anyone.

      Do you think the memories were planted by the psychiatrist?

      The other puzzling things for me are the 10 year gaps between these types of allegations being made public. We have 1993, 2003 and now 2013. Weird.
      We also have the strange thing of no one rushing to Michael's defence before and now, we have celebrities coming out in his defence (Omarion and Lionel Richie, not to mention Tom Meserau all making statements in support of Michael). Not to say that is a bad thing, but it is a strange thing. No one spoke out when the claimants were obviously extortionists but within seconds of a new claim by someone who has a LOT to lose if he is proved to be lying, here is an immediate outpouring of support. Even the tabloids seem to be offering a 'balanced' report of 'it could be about money' and 'he could be involved with AEG'. Which is the biggest red flag of all.
      We have Stacy Brown and Dimond predicting that others will now come forward too. Bleugh!
      I haven't seen any public statements from the Jacksons yet. Also strange.

      Strangest of all is if they are getting ready to unveil him as you are saying as the false prophet, then how would having his reputation besmirched yet again help 'him' deceive anyone that he is the false messiah? Who is going to fall down before him and worship him if people believe Robson's claims to be true? It seems as though just as his legacy and reputation was becoming more positive along comes this plus the trial to drag his name through the mud again. I can't quite work it out but aI'm going to watch this closely because if these claims are publicly trashed as false and we get a deluge of apologetic press in favor of Michael that will be a huge clue. Sorry for the long post. My heart is heavy today. Back to the arms of Jesus for me.


    12. PS Just to make it clear: When I said “Michael doesn't get a free pass just because he's Michael.” I said that in reaction to all the folk who immediately came out and said that Robson was a liar before they had even heard the details of what he was claiming and why. Yes, he is a liar in that he was either lying then or he’s lying now, but I was trying to approach it in an unblinkered, non emotional, measured and rational way before jumping in and calling him names before I had heard the full story. I don’t like what he’s done at all and it hurts my heart that these accusations are still being leveled at Michael.

    13. FG,

      Memories planted by the psychologist? Maybe not the same one, but if you watch his old videos of him being interviewed when he was ten (about the allegations), my first thought came up was that yes, he WAS abused - but not by Michael.

      Nobody got to Michael without his handlers saying so. And this kids that were pushed on Michael, from Chandler through Arvizo - I charge had already BEEN abused before they even met Michael. Think of all the kids taken by our government . . . think of all the parents who sell their kids to the system. LISTEN to Wade Robson and his sister talking and his MOTHER during that interview back in 1993 - do they SOUND Australian to you? I had co-workers from Australia and they have quite a strong accent. Robson's mother sounds like she's FAKING a British accent and NEITHER of the kids have one . . . at all!

      Anyhow something else happened today. I will have this up shortly,
      and FG . . . I'm sorry you were abused and when through that hell as a child . . . me too and you're right - CHRIST separated and saved me from that pain.

    14. I have not listened to/watched these interviews yet. I don't think I can just yet, but I will steel myself and try and do so over the weekend and get back to you with my thoughts. I have such a sick feeling in the pit of my stomach over all of this. As much as I don't want Michael to be maligned I believe this vitriol against Robson is uncalled for too. We have to hear him out first and then make a measured response. Something is terribly wrong. It’s too easy to sling mud at Wade and call him a money grabber etc. I can’t make sense of it just yet but something is not right with any of this and I can’t shake that feeling.

      Imagine having to sit your wife, son (at some point, he will be made aware of it), mother father, grandparents, sister etc down after all these years and say “this happened to me” and get them on side before even taking any further steps with lawyers etc. Imagine being the mother sitting in court defending someone only to hear that the person you have defended harmed your child. Ditto the sister. I am not saying Michael did this, I am saying imagine this information being presented to you. Didn’t Jermaine mention in his book that the mother was offered a six figure sum, I think by the National Enquirer in ‘93 to say that Michael had molested Wade, but she refused it? This is why all of this is just mind boggling to me.

      If as you say he had already been abused I wonder whether or if he would have said anything about it to Michael, or anyone? I’m thinking about Cory Feldman who was also questioned and admitted he had been abused, but not by Michael and that was ignored, but they kept on trying to get him to say that Michael had abused him.

      Two further thoughts: I believe that part of the claim against the estate does mention several parties in this abuse, but their names have not yet been made public (they are referred to as Does 1 2 and 3, if I have understood correctly) so what you said about him having been abused by someone else could well be true.

      Secondly it would take the most arrogant of men to be confident enough to call someone they had abused to stand as a defense witness for them, without any fear at all that this person would crack under the pressure of a court interrogation, “slip up” and “expose” them, would it not? We are hearing that Michael supposedly brainwashed Wade and said to him that “if anyone finds out abut what we did, we will both go to jail and it will ruin our lives.” Not, “if you don’t testify for me…” because at this point (2005) he is saying that he had no recollection of the abuse at all.

      I’m sorry about what happened to you too Bonnie. If not for Jesus…


    15. I see you have your new blog up. I will read that one too and comment there, if appropriate. I need some breathing space first.


  10. Hi Bonnie,
    Didn't Debbie Rowe contact you on this blog? I wonder if she still reads this blog? Did you feel she had any real love for Michael? I want to feel some people really loved Michael. Now Debbie has put on so much weight is that because she is depressed, in grief or has guilt? Paris now spends time with her. Debbie got money from Michael.
    Love, Elizabeth

    1. Elizabeth,

      Debbie Rowe? I have never had Debbie Rowe on this blog. At least not that she's announced, nor has anyone from the Jackson family. If they read this they don't post comments. I have mentioned support for her in the beginning until I dug deeper.

      Real love for Michael? I can't determine that. I really don't know. I think a lot of these people THINK they know what love is and that they love Michael or at least the idea of being his friend or whatever, and I also believe that there are those that worked or WERE friends with Michael that later betrayed him. Did they love him? Probably. And I will even venture that they regret what they did. But when you sell your soul, how do you get it back?

      Debbie agreed to provide the "seed" for these children that also have Klein's features. I have a problem with her not knowing he was the father. But there is more to that story too and I guess we'll just have to wait to here it. As it stands right now, she still seems to be willingly in the game.

      About Debbie's weight, could be menopause too. She's 54 years old. She was kind of heavy when they were "married". Debbie got money from Michael.

      Here's what bothers me. She says she "gave" these kids to Michael. She didn't "want them calling me mom".

      We have the very same oddly familiar sentiment from Michael's dad, Joe Jackson.

      What do you think is going on?

    2. Hi Bonnie,
      It sounds like classic MK Ultra mind control training to me. Trying to distance yourself emotionally from your own children and train them up so you can maybe use them to make money. I remember how Debbie would say to Michael "You need to be a Daddy" over and over again. This sounds like hypnotism to me. Like Uri Geller saying to Michael "You will die of drugs". It's hypnotism and Michael was very vulnerable.
      Love, Elzabeth

    3. HI Elizabeth,

      Sorry for the late replies here, I had some recovery to do today (minor outpatient surgery) - MK Ultra - Monarch and whatever else they are calling it now.

      I don't believe Michael died, but something DID happen. And yes, the very familiar pattern of emotional atrophy with both Debbie's sentiments and Joe Jackson. God wins in the end but until then, I have to fight myself not to wish enact his justice, like right now!

  11. Wow. You know, I'm not on board with the disrespect this kid is exhibiting, but I have to agree with everything he said. Everything.

    1. video is removed already.

    2. Actually it is still up and working. If you can't access it from your country, try doing a search on "High School Student Goes Off On Teacher About Education"

  12. This is the kind of search terms I get, just so you can see what kind of garbage I get in people trying to influence this blog (they know I check stats):

    Search Referral: — paris jackson cryImage Search
    Host Name: Browser: Chrome 26.0
    IP Address: — [Label IP Address] Operating System: WinVista
    Location: Montjean-sur-loire, Pays De La Loire, France Resolution: 1600x900
    Returning Visits: 0 Javascript: Enabled
    Visit Length: 4 seconds ISP: Bouygues Telecom

    Search Referral: — michael jackson - i draw more people than jesus
    Host Name: 41-73-158.isghana Browser: IE 9.0
    IP Address: — [Label IP Address] Operating System: Win7
    Location: Nigeria Resolution: 1600x900
    Returning Visits: 0 Javascript: Enabled
    Visit Length: Not Applicable ISP: Isinternetsolutions

    Michael never said this - but John Lennon did.

    1. Bonnie

      You're right. John Lennon said the Beatles were more popular than Jesus.

  13. Update:

    I wanted to let you know that I had a little "surgery" yesterday - nothing serious at all, just an outpatient thing, but It kept me from finishing the blog yesterday. I'm still a little sore but I will work on it today.

    Catching up with news, I also saw this which I think you all will be interested in . . .

    'Why don't we close the door and really have some fun' - Daily Mail‎
    Jan 31, 2013 – Dr Allan Metzger (pictured) is being sued by Victoria Oliver over claims he sexually assaulted her during a check-up, according to a lawsuit filed ...

    Picture with Michael in 2003 is photoshopped.

    This one includes mention of his Med. board reprimand for prescribing pills for Janet under a false name:

    Metzger - friend of Klein. Perhaps another "drama" written up to distract/overwhelm. The timing of this and Wade is just too much after all these years (her complaint was from back in 2010 - three years ago). But as that is said, there are bigger things brewing that they DON'T want you to know about . . . so we keep digging.

  14. Hi Bonnie,

    Signs of lying wonders, remember when Kenny Ortega called MJ the Artist when he testified during the trial? And I still can't believe the lack of emotion during his memorial.. IT just didn't seem real.. but his mother was crying. What about that? A mother would always know...However the memorial that was put up in Georgia has the picture of a fake Michael jackson on it too. that supposedly died of cancer I think.
    Maybe more then one Michael Jackson was taken out on June 25th I think.

    1. Yes. On the email that was shown in court, between Kenny, to Phillips, Dileo and Gongaware, Kenny referred to "the artist". Why do that when you worked with the man for twenty years on tour?

      Michael's mother was crying. She also was VERY unhappy/uncomfortable during her Piers Morgan interview (sitting next to Livingstone Strong), when she said she believed she would "see my son again" because "I believe in the resurrection". Well, if the resurrection is going to be that depressing? Count me out. I think THEY made her say that, because she certainly was NOT excited about it. And I surmise it was because she knows WHAT they will resurrect will NOT be her son.

      This stuff with Wade Robson could be part in parcel to persecute Katherine, but she knows her son is innocent. And as Micheline had said and I agree - Why would the estate be sabataging Michael's image . . . NOW? They could be doing this to work up emotions with fans, but at this stage of the game it is too risky.

      There IS another possibility . . . .

      "I'm gonna be exactly what you're gonna see" . . . "I'll be grotesque before your eyes".

      Let your mind take it from there. As far as I'm concerned, it's all part of the show. And I'm no longer impressed with the plot.

  15. What do you mean Michael should have perhaps done more of the raising of his children and not left it to his handlers?

    Didn't MJ raise his children? And who were MJ's handelers?


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.