Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: November 2013

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Guess Where "YahWeh" Came From?


God Gave You His Word




"13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.

14 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.

15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves."


We’re Almost There


In the verses above, Jesus is ripping into the scribes and Pharisees.  I went on a Facebook rant early Monday morning.  It went like this:

- Jesus is awesome! It's a shame nobody listens to him . . .

- Matthew 11:10-11 "10 For this is he, of whom it is written, Behold, I send my messenger before thy face, which shall prepare thy way before thee.

11 Verily I say unto you, Among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he that is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he....

- Matthew 11:12-14 "12 And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force.

13 For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John.

14 And if ye will receive it, this is Elias, which was for to come."

- Matthew 11:15-19
"15 He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.

16 But whereunto shall I liken this generation? It is like unto children sitting in the markets, and calling unto their fellows,

17 And saying, We have piped unto you, and ye have not danced; we have mourned unto you, and ye have not lamented.

18 For John came neither eating nor drinking, and they say, He hath a devil.

19 The Son of man came eating and drinking, and they say, Behold a man gluttonous, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners. But wisdom is justified of her children.

- Jesus said:

Matthew 24:15
"When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:)"

- Jesus also said this in Mark 13:14 -

"14 But when ye shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing where it ought not, (let him that readeth understand,) then let them that be in Judaea flee to the mountains:"

- Why is it NONE of the pastors address "Michael, the great prince" in Daniel's prophecies? He's mentioned three times in relation to the end - Especially Daniel 12:1 where we are told Michael will stand up during a time of trouble like there never was before - and at that time all will be delivered who are written in "the book"? Why is this never in the sermons?

- Jesus EMPHASIZED THIS in his warning to watch for the end times. Read Jude 1:9 and Revelation 12:1 and 2 Thessalonians 2 as well as Ecclesiastes 4:14-15. Much is being glossed over and covered up! Ask yourself why?

- Do you know how many of our churches support the anti-Christ? Do you know how many of them teach the "doctrine of devils" and veneer it with twisted interpretation of scripture?

- Do you know that not just Jesus but the whole Bible tells us who the anti Christ is? It's in the books of Moses, it's in Isaiah, in Jeremiah, Daniel, and Jesus himself tells us who they are.

- But we fund their wars against the innocents no matter what administration is running this country.

- Jesus - again in Matthew, chapter 23:13-17

"13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.

14 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.

15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

16 Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor!

17 Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold?"

- And what is the "temple"? Jesus tells us that too - John 2:21
But he spake of the temple of his body." And We are told again in 1 Corinthians 6:19
What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?" And

- 1 Corinthians 3:16
Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? and 1 Corinthians 3:17
If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are." ............ And 2 Corinthians 6:16
And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people." ........... and Mark 14:58
We heard him say, I will destroy this temple that is made with hands, and within three days I will build another made without hands."................. and Acts 7:48
Howbeit the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet," ................................. And "Acts 17:24
God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;" The DECEPTION encompasses this very detail!

- Verse 15 in Matthew 23 TELLS US who will "make" the vile one!

- A Proselyte is a "NEW CONVERT"! Someone who is CONVERTED from Christianity to the "doctrine of devils". A "previous" temple of God which becomes "corrupted" - an "abomination" standing where it OUGHT NOT. Standing in the HOLY PLACE. ................. Who has to be "taken out of the way" for "evil to be revealed" in 2Thess. 2??? This is not some colloquial fairytale, this is ALREADY HAPPENING!


Why are ministers and pastors not seeing the signs?  Is everyone who cries “Lord, Lord” going to be going to Heaven:

"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven."


"a new convert (as to a faith or cause)"

Convert – Michael Jackson, lyrics to song “Morphine
"Relax - This won't hurt you.  Before I put it in, Close your eyes and count to ten

Don't cry - I won't convert you.  There's no need to dismay, Close your eyes and drift away"


In chapter 23 of Matthew, verse 15, Jesus tells us of the Pharisees plans to find their “convert”.  This of course is spoken in general terms by Jesus.  No names are mentioned, and we can’t be sure the way this is worded, whether Jesus is talking specifically of the end times, or if the Pharisees goals are to convert everyone.  But it is spoken of in singular terms, and the term “proselyte” suggests they are looking for someone already NOT Jewish or rather, someone who is already Christ believing.  And that leaves out most of the Jews of that day.

This also tells us that Jesus is speaking of their future endeavors.  Jesus slams them in these verses, calling out not only their hypocrisies and deceptions, he calls out their future plans, which is why he was so hated.  Who else could know their plans but God?

All of the religious ruling Jews of that day, and their future plans were called out that day by Jesus, in front of crowds.  And much like the powers that be in our world today, they sought to kill him to guard their secrets ambitions for global self-deification.

There are indeed so many nations, churches, organizations and social institutions, global merchants entangled in this putrid network, that they will indeed accomplish what their fathers and their father’s fathers have not, but only for a short time.

The devil and his angels corrupted themselves with flesh.  They “left their first estate”, and it is flesh through which they work, appealing to and seducing through the same.

"And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire."


Along with Jesus’ own prophecies in both Matthew 23 and Matthew 24, where he warns us specifically NOT to be deceived, emphasizing the prophecies of Daniel in verses 15 and Mark 13:14; Jude 1:9 identifies Michael as the one who stops the devil from taking Moses body for his own use.  This verse not only identifies Michael as the “angel of the Lord”, it also identifies him as the one who knows what their plans for possessing a vessel for deception entail.  Jesus then verifies this in Matthew 23:15.

Michael is also mentioned by name in Revelation 12 as the one who is in Heaven when the dragon tries to get back in, after the “man child” in the end times is taken out of the way when the dragon strives during that person’s life time to “devour” his soul.  This child is “to rule the nations with a rod of iron” in verses 4-5 of Revelation 12, and also in verse 5 is “caught up to God and to his throne”.

In the book of Daniel he is mentioned three times by name, as the “great prince” and the “Prince that stands for the children of your people”.

In Daniel 12: 1 I was reading this yet again.  As I said on “Kingdom of Heaven…”, I saw something in Daniel 12:1 that has always been there but never stuck out at me before:

"And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.

2 And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt.

Below these verses I had written:

At the time that the “vile one” is “taken down without anger or battle from Daniel 11, “Michael “stands up” and it says “AND there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation.”

How does Michael go from being the sign of “trouble” to “they people shall be delivered”?  Does he appear as the bad guy or as the good guy?

It goes on to say “. . . and AT that time, thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book”.

This reads as one event or rather, one person, both events. The same vessel.  But what occurs that would explain what the angel told Daniel in Daniel 10:21?

This is why the “angel” emphasizes to Daniel in Chapter 10:

"But I will shew thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince."

I have never heard one minister, one pastor in any service I attended at any time from childhood through present day address Michael’s role in the book of Daniel, NOR where he connects the events of prophecy between Daniel, Isaiah, Matthew 24, 2 Thessalonians 2, Jude 1 or Revelation 12.  Not once and I’ve been alive at least in THIS temple for almost 50 years.

When you consider the majority of the church institutions worshipping Christ throughout the World are doing so through the veneer of the doctrine of devils , developed by men of old who deny Christ which we were also warned about in Jude 1.  This brings me to another interesting topic.

The Hebrew language of today is not the Hebrew language of old, spoken by the people of Abraham and Isaac and Moses.  Traditional has been replaced with “modern” and true “Hebrew” has been replaced with “Yiddish” or variants thereof.

Traditional Hebrew Alphabet


Modern Hebrew Alphabet


Mystical Hebrew Kabbalah Alphabet



Remember this picture of Michael and what I thought was a mixture of Hebrew and Russian Alphabet?  It’s not

Michael Jackson
HIStory Army


Mystical Earth Child Alphabet


None of them are exact.  You can search the charts here.  The message on those sleeves were not for us.

We know Hebrew is not what it used to be as we researched the various articles covered on “Contending Over the Body of an Angel; from the massive search for the missing pages of the “Aleppo Codex” (New York Daily News article)which Israel’s Mossad has been harassing the Karaite community to get their hands on; and the article more recently discovered on the blog “Art of Creation” earlier this month.  The article revealed alot about the search using both the Mossad and “recruited” (mind controlled) group of Karaites to infiltrate a community that does not trust the Jews from the Israel government. 

"Emden argued that the Zohar misquotes passages of Scripture; misunderstands the Talmud; contains some ritual observances which were ordained by later rabbinical authorities; mentions The Crusades against Muslims (who did not exist in the 2nd century); uses the expression "esnoga," a Portuguese term for "synagogue"; and gives a mystical explanation of the Hebrew vowel points, which were not introduced until long after the Talmudic period" – Source,Wikipedia

This means that the “mystical explanation of the vowel points” is NEW and NOT part of the original Hebrew. Jesus had a problem with the Talmud as it was back then!  This would explain the Mossad’s mad dash to find the missing books of Moses, David, Esther and parts of a few others that we discussed on “Contending with the Body of an Angel”.


With this in mind, we have had it practically branded into us by Jewish scholars that the name for God is either A. So sacred no one was allowed to utter it but a few elite high priests and/or; B. Because of this, the actual name for God has been forgotten (even though they memorized volumes of Talmudian text for centuries before actually writing it down in Babylon); and/or C. The name for God is “Yahweh” and/or “Eli” and/or “Elohim” and/or “Adonai” and/or the comical “Yud-hey-vav-hey” (or substitute the “vav” for the “waw”) which as we discovered before is nothing more than the phonetic sounding for those letters in the modern Hebrew alphabet.

In the Bible, we are told that Jesus’ name is Jesus.  Period.  The angel tells Joseph in the first Gospel book of Matthew:

"21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name Jesus: for he shall save his people from their sins."

Take note on how “Jesus” is in all caps in that verse.  Something interesting happened when I first posted this to Word.  Word “corrected” it to “lower case” letters except for the first letter in His name.  So I went back the that verse, copied just Jesus’ name again, then posted it directly here in the same font as was in the script in the Bible.  I thought that was MIGHTY odd.

Further down in verse 25, “Jesus” is also on all caps, but not in any other part of the Gospels where he is talking.  Only in reference to what the angel says to name him.

And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name Jesus.

The name “Jesus” is listed in the New Testament only – 942 times! 

The other verses in which “Jesus” name is in all caps:

And set up over his head his accusation written, This Is Jesus The King Of The Jews.

It is not until Luke that Mary’s part of the angel’s message to her that we see Jesus’ name again in all caps and again, in reference to what he shall be named:

And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name Jesus.

And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called Jesus, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.

The last place we see this is in John chapter 19 again in reference to the sign they nailed above him in the cross:

And Pilate wrote a title, and put it on the cross. And the writing was Jesus Of Nazareth The King Of The Jews.

Interesting to note, we are told by Paul that Pilate did NOT want to crucify Jesus.  We are told his wife knew Jesus was a “holy man” but we are not told for sure that Pilate knew it or not.  So this addition in John 19 in reference to what Pilate names him, and the fact that all caps are added here is interesting.

"The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, the God of our fathers, hath glorified his Son Jesus; whom ye delivered up, and denied him in the presence of Pilate, when he was determined to let him go."

This isn’t the story the Jewish scholars tell.  Pilate was manipulated into killing him, using threat of a riot from the crowd, whom the Jews had stirred up.  Pilate’s wife told him “he is a holy man”.  The Jews still to this day heap guilt on the Romans for this, yet call him disgusting names in their own circles.  The story you get from the anti-Christs is NOT biblical.

Now, why is this capitalization of Jesus’ name significant?

If you remember from the blog “Michael Called Him Jehovah God”, we took note of the “all caps” for the word “LORD” when referring to God or the “angel of the LORD” when it pertained to the word “JEHOVAH”.

"And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name Jehovah was I not known to them."

One misguided person suggested on a forum I posted below, that Abraham called God by the same name “I Am” that Moses was given, but clearly in the scriptures, God tells Moses that Abraham did not know God by that name.

We also did extensive research on the origins of the King James Bible, William Tyndale and his martyrdom over this translation.

A quote by William Tyndale:

"They have ordained that no man shall look on the Scripture, until he be noselled in heathen learning eight or nine years and armed with false principles, with which he is clean shut out of the understanding of the Scripture." - Source, Wikipedia

No kidding?  Why would they want that?

"The translators of the Revised Standard Version in the 1940s noted that Tyndale's translation inspired the great translations that followed, including the Great Bible of 1539, the Geneva Bible of 1560, the Bishops' Bible of 1568, the Douay-Rheims Bible of 1582–1609, and the King James Version of 1611, of which the RSV translators noted: "It [the KJV] kept felicitous phrases and apt expressions, from whatever source, which had stood the test of public usage. It owed most, especially in the New Testament, to Tyndale". Source, Wikipedia

Karaite Jews (of Aleppo, Syria and Aleppo Codex)

- "Karaite Jews,[12] as proponents of the rendering Jehovah, state that although the original pronunciation of יהוה has been obscured by disuse of the spoken name according to oral Rabbinic law, well-established English transliterations of other Hebrew personal names are accepted in normal usage, such as Joshua, Isaiah or Jesus, for which the original pronunciations may be unknown." - Source, Nehemiah Gordon, "Pronunciation of the Name"


Jews and Masoretes

- "According to a Jewish tradition developed during the 3rd to 2nd centuries BCE, the Tetragrammaton is written but not pronounced. When read, substitute terms replace the divine name where יְהֹוָה appears in the text. It is widely assumed, as proposed by the 19th-century Hebrew scholar Gesenius, that the vowels of the substitutes of the name—Adonai (Lord) and Elohim (God)—were inserted by the Masoretes to indicate that these substitutes were to be used." - Source, H.W.F. Gesenius, Gesenius's Hebrew-Chaldee, Lexicon to the Old Testament.


William Tyndale's Translations:

- "Early modern translators disregarded the practice of reading Adonai (or its equivalents in Greek and Latin, Κύριος and Dominus)[20] in place of the Tetragrammaton and instead combined the four Hebrew letters of the Tetragrammaton with the vowel points that, except in synagogue scrolls, accompanied them, resulting in the form Jehovah.[21] This form, which first took effect in works dated 1278 and 1303, was adopted in Tyndale's and some other Protestant translations of the Bible" - Source, Wikipedia, cite note 22


"The Brown-Driver-Briggs Lexicon suggested that the pronunciation Jehovah was unknown until 1520 when it was introduced by Galatinus, who defended its use.

In English it appeared in William Tyndale's translation of the Pentateuch ("The Five Books of Moses"),[28] published in 1530 in Germany, where Tyndale had studied since 1524, possibly in one or more of the universities at Wittenberg, Worms and Marburg, where Hebrew was taught.[29] The spelling used by Tyndale was "Iehouah"; at that time, "I" was not distinguished from J, and U was not distinguished from V" - Source, Wikipedia, various cite sources

Remember this issue above with the vowels/consonant distinguishing when we get to the Hebrew language sources.


"The original 1611 printing of the Authorized King James Version used "Iehovah". Tyndale wrote about the divine name: "IEHOUAH [Jehovah], is God's name; neither is any creature so called; and it is as much to say as, One that is of himself, and dependeth of nothing. Moreover, as oft as thou seest LORD in great letters (except there be any error in the printing), it is in Hebrew Iehouah, Thou that art; or, He that is." - Source, William Tyndale, Doctrinal Treatises, ed. Henry Walter (Cambridge, 1848), p. 408.

Mind you this is a “quote” published in a post-Ashkenazi, British publication.  Keep this in mind as well when the “concurring” toward “Jehovah” is always accompanied with the “I” for “J” explanation.

One last source, which will take us into some other research:

"18th-century theologian John Gill puts forward the arguments of 17th-century Johannes Buxtorf II and others in his writing, A Dissertation Concerning the Antiquity of the Hebrew Language, Letters, Vowel-Points and Accents.[58] He argued for an extreme antiquity of their use,[59] rejecting the idea that the vowel points were invented by the Masoretes. Gill presented writings, including passages of scripture, that he interpreted as supportive of his "Jehovist" viewpoint that the Old Testament must have included vowel-points and accents.[60] He claimed that the use of Hebrew vowel points of יְהֹוָה, and therefore of the name Jehovah /jəˈhoʊvə/, is documented from before 200 BCE, and even back to Adam, citing Jewish tradition that Hebrew was the first language. He argued that throughout this history the Masoretes did not invent the vowel points and accents, but that they were delivered to Moses by God at Sinai, citing[61] Karaite authorities." - Source, Wikipedia with various cited sources


Karaite authorities.  I remind you of the article again in the New York Daily News, concerning the four-continent search for the MISSING books of Moses, Daniel, Esther and parts of others that the STATE of Israel has been trying to squeeze out of the Karaite Jews of Aleppo.  According to that article this has employed the use of infiltrators, Israel’s Mossad, and if we are to be so bold, calls for WAR against Syria by Israel, which this past year have been via “terrorists” in Aleppo. (“Contending Over The Body of an Angel”).

There is good reason the Karaites do NOT trust the Jews running Israel.


"The argument between Karaite and Rabbinic Judaism on whether it was lawful to pronounce the name represented by the Tetragrammaton[61] is claimed to show that some copies have always been pointed (voweled)[53] and that some copies were not pointed with the vowels because of "oral law", for control of interpretation by some Judeo sects, including non-pointed copies in synagogues.[64] Gill claimed that the pronunciation /jəˈhoʊvə/ can be traced back to early historical sources which indicate that vowel points and/or accents were used in their time.[65] Sources Gill claimed supported his view include:

The Book of Cosri and commentator Rabbi Judab Muscatus, which claim that the vowel points were taught to Adam by God.[66]
Saadiah Gaon (927 AD)[67]
Jerome (380 AD)[68]
Origen (250 AD)[69]
The Zohar (120 AD)[70]
Jesus Christ (31 AD), based on Gill's interpretation of Matthew 5:18[71]
Hillel the Elder and Shammai division (30 BC)[72]
Karaites (120 BCE)[61]
Demetrius Phalereus, librarian for Ptolemy II Philadelphus king of Egypt (277 BCE)[73]" - Source, Wikipedia with various cited sources



Study of Names Again

"holy city in ancient Palestine, from Greek Hierousalem, from Hebrew Yerushalayim, literally "foundation of peace," from base of yarah "he threw, cast" + shalom "peace." Jerusalem "artichoke" is folk etymology of Italian girasole "sunflower."

"late 12c. (Old English used hælend "savior"), from Greek Iesous, which is an attempt to render into Greek the Aramaic proper name Jeshua (Hebrew Yeshua) "Jah is salvation," a common Jewish personal name, the later form of Hebrew Yehoshua (see Joshua)."

masc. proper name, biblical son of Jacob by Leah, also the name of a tribe of Israel, from Hebrew Yehudah, from stem of y-d-h, literally "praised."


I looked up "Jewish" and found this


"Jewish (adj.) Look up Jewish at Dictionary.com
1540s, from Jew + -ish. Old English had Iudeisc; early Middle English used Judewish, Judeish (late 12c.). Figurative use in reference to extortionate money-lending attested by c.1600." – Source, Etymonline.com


The etymology for Israel was also there:


"Old English, "the Jewish people," from Latin Israel, from Greek, from Hebrew yisra'el "he that striveth with God" (Gen. xxxii.28), symbolic proper name conferred on Jacob and extended to his descendants, from sara "he fought, contended" + El "God." As an independent Jewish state in the country formerly called Palestine, it is attested from 1948." – Source, Etymonline.com


The Jewish people – The Jews came from Judah. There were eleven other tribes of Israel.  Note the origin of this in “Old English”.

Interestingly, the name "Yiddish" was also there:


"1875, from Yiddish yidish, from Middle High German jüdisch "Jewish" (in phrase jüdisch deutsch "Jewish-German"), from jude "Jew," from Old High German judo, from Latin Judaeus (see Jew). The English word has been re-borrowed in German as jiddisch." – Source, Etymonline.com


I find it rather curious and a bit too much for coincidence that the false Jews, or Russian/Gog and Magog converts from the Kazarian empire later developed the "Yiddish" language after being converted by the Jews of Babylon (wikipedia)

Yiddish replaces the German "Jewish", Dutch "Judisch" and the English re-borrowed in German as "Jiddish".  Yiddish begins with a "y".  So does the new state of "Yisrael", "Yehodah" for Judah, "Yerushaliyam" for Jerusalem.

Khazarian empire were converted by Jewish “scribes” sent from Babylon – Source, Wikipedia/Khazars


"Beginning in the 8th century, the Khazar royalty and notable segments of the aristocracy converted to Judaism;” – Source, Wikipedia via Golden 2007


And of course, the qualifier; further down it says -


A modern theory, that the core of Ashkenazi Jewry emerged from a hypothetical Khazarian Jewish diaspora, is generally treated with scepticism. This Khazarian hypothesis is sometimes associated with antisemitism and anti-Zionism." – Source, Wikipedia and ruling elite conversion to Babylonian Judaism


So the Ashkenazi Jews of Khazar make up the vast majority of Jews in the world, yet to point this out makes you an “anti-Semite”?  The Yiddish language as we covered before, originated from this mix of Hebrew and the Bavarian/German languages (“Don’t You Wrong or Right Me”, August 2011) and the Karaites, who were protected in Aleppo before they dispersed with different books of the Codex, are on the outs with the godless Jews of the state of Israel. 

Yiddish came out of this “empire”, a mix of high Germanic, Russian and the taught Hebrew from the Rabbi’s sent from Babylon.


"Yiddish (ייִדיש yidish or אידיש idish, literally "Jewish") is a High German language of Ashkenazi Jewish origin, spoken in many parts of the world. It developed as a fusion of different German dialects with adstrats of Hebrew, Aramaic and Slavic vocabulary and some traces of vocabulary from the Romance languages.[2][3] Yiddish orthography uses the Hebrew alphabet."

"The language originated in the Ashkenazi culture that developed from about the 10th century in the Rhineland and then spread to Central and Eastern Europe and eventually to other continents."

"Yiddish is written and spoken in many Orthodox Jewish communities around the world, although there are also a number of Orthodox Jews who do not know Yiddish. It is a home language in most Hasidic communities, where it is the first language learned in childhood and used in schools and in many social settings. Yiddish is also the academic language of the study of the Talmud according to the tradition of the Lithuanian yeshivas." - Source, Wikipedia with references


Yiddish and Ashkenazi Takeover of Hebrew:


"The national languages of Israel are Hebrew and Arabic. The debate in Zionist circles over the use of Yiddish in Israel and in the Diaspora in preference to Hebrew also reflected the tensions between religious and secular Jewish lifestyles. Many secular Zionists wanted Hebrew as the sole language of Jews, to contribute to a national cohesive identity. Traditionally religious Jews, on the other hand, preferred use of Yiddish, viewing Hebrew as a respected holy language reserved for prayer and religious study. In the early 20th century, Zionist activists in Palestine tried to eradicate the use of Yiddish among Jews in preference to Hebrew, and make its use socially unacceptable" - Source, Wikipedia with references


Religiously, Yiddish dominates:


"In religious circles, it is the Ashkenazi Haredi Jews, particularly the Hasidic Jews and the Lithuanian yeshiva world (see Lithuanian Jews), who continue to teach, speak and use Yiddish, making it a language used regularly by hundreds of thousands of Haredi Jews today. The largest of these centers are in Bnei Brak and Jerusalem." - Source, Wikipedia with references


So if Ashkenazi/Khazarian Jews make up between 83 and 92% of the world’s Jews, and the “Religious” Jews are the ones who insist on keeping Hebrew for their own private religious use while handing the rest of the world Yiddish, it should then be conclusive who is responsible for conspiring to keep the true name of God secret.

Considering many verses of scripture from Old to New Testament advocate calling on “the Name of the Lord”, one has to wonder why Jews would want to cover this up?


"Although in the 11th century, it is estimated that they composed only three percent of the world's Jewish population, at their peak in 1931, Ashkenazi Jews accounted for 92 percent of the world's Jews.

Today, figures vary for the contemporary statistics. Some sources place Ashkenazi as making up approximately 83-85 percent of Jews worldwide" - Source, Wikepedia and sources,


That is quite a voting majority isn't it?  Karaites and the truth doesn't stand a chance.


"The conversion of Khazars to Judaism is reported by external sources and in the Khazar Correspondence, Hebrew documents whose authenticity was long doubted and challenged,[84] but now widely accepted among specialists as either authentic or as reflecting internal Khazar traditions.[85][86][87][88]

Conversion of steppe or peripheral tribes to a universal religion is fairly well attested phenomenon,[89] and the Khazar conversion to Judaism, though unusual, was not unique" - Source, Wikipedia via numerous sources


So which is it?  Not unique or unusually considering other sources estimate the vast majority of Jews today are Ashkenazi?  Quoted was 83 to 85% and in 1931, 92% of the world's Jews.

Most of this may be inconsequential, because there were no Ashkenazi Jews in the days that Jesus was battling the Pharisees.

I went a little deeper and found some surprising discussion:

I did some searching around on the internet as to the letters in TRADITIONAL Hebrew and according to several sources, there IS or WAS a "J" sound in the Hebrew language but not a WRITTEN LETTER J.  The letter representing that sound was the same for "I" or "Y", even though the sound itself was “jeh” or “jah”; much like our English letters of the hard “Kah” sound and the soft “sah” for the letter “C” or both “Jah” (soft) and “gah” (hard) for “G”.  This explains the Greek version of Jesus' name "Ieosus".  Here was one of those explanations:

"There was a "j" sound, just not a written "j". The written letter "i" could have the "i", "y", or "j" sound. Which sound was used depended on the next letter. The written "j" was created to help make it less confusing to know which sound is used." - Source, AboveTopSecret


She is right.  She was  heckled of course and she responded with this:


"I am completely correct. The people you are getting your info from, are the same ones that hate the name of Jesus (Babylonian Jews and Yahwists).


The Hebrews took the "j" sound from Egypt. "

She posted this picture,


Egyptian Alphabet written



Further down, when she was pressed again, she answered about these charts and the reference:

Tetragrammaton Explanation is wrong


Evolution of the Alphabet



And she quoted this:


"You are getting your info from antichrist sources. Their goal is to wipe out the true name of God. The truth is, there was a "j" sound that the Hebrews got from the Egyptians.


Interestingly this would have been through Moses, who was rescued from a river by the Pharoh’s daughter and adopted, growing up with the Egyptian language with the Israelites as a whole, in “bondage” to the Egyptian kingdom.  It was Moses that God handed down the laws to on mount. Sinai.

She also said:


YHWH is Aramaic, not Hebrew. It has no connection to God and is used in Babylonian witchcraft."


On another source, I found on "ancient-hebrew.org" http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/emagazine/053.html  the "word for the day" was "jungle".  The explanation of how each of the Hebrew letters come to equal the sounds represented by the letters in the English "Jungle" have explanation except why the "Y" is translated to "J".  There is none given.  Because the change was made in more modern Hebrew or rather, what is given non-Jews since the days of Jude's warning.

Question:  If the English Language already has the sound "y" represented in the Hebrew Language, why would "Jewish Scholars" translate all "y" letters into "j" if there was no J in the Hebrew language as they so frequently blather?  One lengthy, convoluted explanation was actually attempted here.  Unfortunately he brought in the variable of the "Aramaic" language which some claim Jesus spoke.

If you keep reading through that mess, you come to realize that with their explanation, it would have to be a miracle for "Yashuah" to become "Jesus" as there seems to be no "J" letter OR sound even in the root language from which English came, according to THEIR explanation.  With those odds, how was the error made and more to the point, why was William Tyndale persecuted and then executed for translating the first English "Jehovah" in the Bible?

Their numerous explanations, contradictions and twisted historical "facts" all fail to explain why Jews would tell you the truth about the name of God when they believe you have no right to it, and the name of Jesus, someone they deny anyway.

This is where the reference to God's name being blasphemed daily comes from in Isaiah 52. 

"5 Now therefore, what have I here, saith the Lord, that my people is taken away for nought? they that rule over them make them to howl, saith the Lord; and my name continually every day is blasphemed."

There are also other scriptures pertaining to the fact that the Jews DID THIS long before Khazar!

"O God, how long shall the adversary reproach? shall the enemy blaspheme thy name for ever?"

"For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as it is written."

Romans 2:24 – Wow!  “Bam!” as the Michaelers would say.

And considering most of our "sources" of "explaining" the scripture come from Jewish scholars (whom are anti-Christ and who deny him), we have to use critical thinking and deductive reasoning skills which this person debating on this forum did.  It is very interesting reading.  When you have time - http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread891207/pg3

Now, the new slant (or the old, however you want to look at it) suggests that the Jewish-given name for God "Yahweh" actually came from Babylon, which would make the Bible look like a liar when "Yahweh" did not come from scripture.  It came from Judaism, which is not a "Christ" supporting religion.  Sources like:

  

These ideas are now making its rounds on the internet through various websites and actually edifies the idea of the new age, Babylonian mystery religion and attempts to discredit God and Jesus Christ as just variants of the “One” religion.

Aside from the debate, we have SCRIPTURE to verify everything this person said, up to and including the accusation by Jesus himself against those who 'shut up the kingdom of heaven from men" and who "blaspheme the name of God daily" by trying to convince us that the ancient, and modernly bastardized version of Hebrew we are given today was constructed from the Babylonian desire to hide the name of God from God's people and those who WANT to be close to God.

All this “is it ‘y’ is it “j” reminded me of a movie I believe I had discussed briefly that starred Eddie Murphy.  Remember “The Golden Child”?

“Numspa” can’t pronounce the “J” in anything
At 0:35 – “I can destroy you . . . Yust like that”
Calls him “detective Yarrell” instead of “Jarrell”


Some other quotes from the movie - on IMDB.com

"Sardo Numspaa: I have been wanting to meet you, Mr. Yarrell.
Fu: [Indescribable Tibetan language]
Chandler Jarrell: Get your 'monkey' off my back.
Sardo Numspaa: Of course. Fu, please retire.
Chandler Jarrell: Yeah, Fu. Save it." -

I'm not the only one with this question; Internet Movie Database Message boards:

Why Can't Sardo Numspa say the letter J"?


Answers not surprising



Oh, yes it does, make perfect sense.  Read the rest of the quotes then take a look at another quote below:

"Kee Nang: She's over 300 years old.
Chandler Jarrell: How do you manage something like that?
Kee Nang: One of her ancestors was raped by a dragon.
Chandler Jarrell: Does that happen a lot where you come from?"

Reference is from Genesis 6:2-4 and Daniel 2:43, no?  The mingling of the seed of the “sons of God” with the “daughters of men”.

It is not my intention to suggest that Hollywood is secretly trying to verify the Bible.  On the contrary, they've done everything possible to steer us from it; but in the process of choking us with propaganda and pagan substitutes for the stories in the Bible, they manage to end up assisting in verifying it.

Eddie Murphy and Michael Jackson also have a connection.  They recorded the song "Whazzup With You".  Did you ever see the words to that song?

"We can't stop this world
Cause' it's not our world
We can just
Jackie Chan it up
Even when we're falling
He's mighty patient
He's got your number
Beat your disease
He knows you're fallin
You're fallin'
You're fallin'
Falling
Men is a creation
Men is nothing more so

Chorus:
Whatzup?
Whatzup?
Whatzup with you?"
Source, Lyricsmode

To cover up and hide the very names you need to call on, the corruption of the original “Word” – and the language of  God so that the “Kingdom of heaven is shut up from men” -

Michael and Barry Gibb said it best:

It's All In Your Name, Jehovah, God


Yes, he was STILL trying to tell us.  AFTER Barry Gibb released this under his own, independent recording label, Sony managed to get rights to it because now it is featured on THEIR web sites.  But the song has been heard.  And you have the choice to listen and HEAR . . . or not.