Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Silence Is Golden Part II

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Saturday, August 23, 2014

Silence Is Golden Part II

  

A Dead Sea Conspiracy





"And the border shall go down to Jordan, and the goings out of it shall be at the salt sea: this shall be your land with the coasts thereof round about."

"That the waters which came down from above stood and rose up upon an heap very far from the city Adam, that is beside Zaretan: and those that came down toward the sea of the plain, even the salt sea, failed, and were cut off: and the people passed over right against Jericho."

I know I have been slow in getting the blogs up and I want to apologize.  I’m fighting a flu for what is now going on the second week.  I don’t think this was an ordinary run of the mill flu because I ran fevers almost solidly for the first week and it began the day my in-laws left to go back home.  It has been a very discouraging week for all of us on several levels.

On the last blog I put up “Silence is Golden” there was something I meant to cover that I left out (unintentionally, as it was at the bottom of my notes and fever-fog made focus difficult).  In the section where we were discussing the “six turned up with the nine” with the Kabbalastic notion that threes of any number (especially nine or six) were representative of perfection.

. . .The six and the nine : 6 for men, 9 for women. These are the sexes, the sixes.  It is an ancient lore, the lore of the Tradition. The Cancer symbol shows the six and the nine in a close embrace.  Cancer is the Moon’s sign, reflecting the Sun.

However we interpret this number, if we condemn the Beast, we condemn all men. Beyond this simple difference of the sexes, the Sun is the heart of goodness for us all." - Source,Factsbehindfaith.com/Kabbalah


I had meant to elaborate on the “Cancer” symbol, which is this:



Also under the same image search you will find a very familiar and popular “support” symbol – the “crossed ribbon”, which is a slyly hidden 69:



The Taoist Symbol “Yin and Yang” is the same exact thing:

Yin-Yang


It means the same in “feminine/masculine” energies, “as above so below”, Light and dark, good and evil ect…

Knowing this then, understand the common layout of our DNA, two opposing strands, opposite mirrors of each other joined together by a “hydrogen bond”.  They are “anti-parallel” strands joined together:



We will also explore the discrepancy with the “chapiters” on “Jachin and Boaz” and how they began as “five cubits”, but when returned by Sheshbazzar via King Cyrus on Israel’s return from exile, one end of the pillar’s chapitars was “three cubits”, and this relation to the controversy between the foundation’s layers “Sheshbazzar” and “Zerubbabel”.

I began the blog “Silence is Golden” telling you about the dream in which I was standing on a river bank and saw a path of dry ground come up in the river cutting off waters, and that this made a distinct shape of a letter “H” or the “I” on its side.

The “H” in Aramaic is represented by the fifth letter “Heh” and appears twice in the Tetragrammaton.  It looks like the chet but with an opening top left corner of the letter.  In Paleo-Hebrew the “he” looks like a backward capital “E”.  In Aramaic it means “Jubilation”.  In Paleo-Hebrew it means “window”.  The Greek equivalent is the letter Epsilon which looks very much like the modern English “E”.

epsilon (n.) -
from Greek, literally e psilon "bare -e-, -e- and nothing else," in contradistinction to the diphthong -ai-, which has the same sound. Greek psilon "smooth, simple" is of uncertain origin.

A few weeks back there was the dream about the Y and Michael was in this dream.  This was shadowing the “lightbulb” moment after watching the “This Is It” Documentary promotional trailer where Kenny Ortega said “The ‘why’ (Y) at the center of everything we do is really all about this”.  So of course I deemed  the dream unimportant because I believed it influenced by this subject.

The only “y” sound represented in the Aramaic is the “Yod” or “Yud” which is the tenth letter in both the Aramaic and the Paleo-Hebrew.  In Aramiac it looks like an apostrophe (a punctuation mark denoting possession or ownership).  In the Paleo Hebrew is resembles a backward “F” with a swoosh at the bottom.  They both mean the same (arm/hand respectively) yet in Greek the “Yod” or its equivalent is the nineth letter because the “vav” equivalent in Greek is missing – skipped.  The Greek equivalent to the “Yod” is the “Iota” and it is the ninth letter, represented by what looks like the English capital “I”.

Why would I have a dream about the “Y” and  the “H” (or the “I” on its side)?

“Y” of course references the male chromosome which through a Ron Wyatt video we were told was the chromosome Christ would have received from the Holy Ghost or the Angel of God as he was conceived in Mary by the same.  Adam was a son of God as referenced in Luke 3:38 at the end of the lineage of Jesus, on Mary’s side.  Adam and Eve fell and were sent from the Garden of God when they were deceived into giving domain over the earth to the father of lies,  the serpent.  Jesus came and more than restoring a corrupted word inside us, he is the restorer of the Spirit.

"That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.   3. And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.

4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown."

There is written record on various web sites of Ron Wyatt’s “discoveries” and in reading one of them, it is easy to see why his story would be believable.

In 1978 it is reported that Ron Wyatt while walking along a stone quarry in Israel before returning to the United States, pointed to an escarpment and said “That’s Jeremiah’s Grotto and the Ark of the Covenant is in there” (Source).  His companion’s response at the time he said was “That's wonderful! We want you to excavate, and we'll furnish your permits, put you up in a place to stay and even furnish your meals!" – (Same Source).

The reason I do not believe this story is because of the events of the Babylonian Exile, the story of Zerubbabel and what Paul said in Hebrews:

"Which had the golden censer, and the ark of the covenant overlaid round about with gold, wherein was the golden pot that had manna, and Aaron's rod that budded, and the tables of the covenant;

5 And over it the cherubims of glory shadowing the mercyseat; of which we cannot now speak particularly."

Because of this cryptic wording in Hebrews, we can know that the apostles knew that the Ark was not lost and that there was something about the mercyseat that they knew but could not speak and would be revealed at a later time.

If you recall and as it is stated with verses on that same web site:

"Ron found in 2 Kings 24:13, 2Kings 25:13-18, and Jeremiah 52:17-23, a very detailed account of the items taken to Babylon from the "king's house" and from the "house of the Lord"- it even mentioned small items like "spoons", etc.  But the Ark isn't mentioned. Neither is it mentioned in the lists of things brought back from Babylon in the book of Ezra.

We are told in Jeremiah 28:3 that everything taken to Babylon from the "house of the Lord" would be returned, and since the Ark wasn't among the returned items, this indicates that it was never taken there.

Shishak and Sennacherib also took items from the "house of the Lord" but they did not include the Ark of the Covenant." - Source, Wyattmuseum.com

Biblical verses linked here are 2 Kings 24:13, 2 Kings 25:13-18, and Jeremiah 52:17-23.  The book of Ezra covers several chapters in describing the “return” of the children of Israel following the Babylonian exile, King Cyrus’ proclamation and the return of all the vessels of the house of the Lord.  They cite Jeremiah 28:3 as proof that everything that was taken to Babylon from the house of the Lord would be returned and the Ark is not mentioned.

"Within two full years will I bring again into this place all the vessels of the Lord's house, that Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon took away from this place, and carried them to Babylon:"

If you read that whole chapter, you will learn that Hananiah had falsely prophesied  concerning the breaking of the wooden yoke and Jeremiah had to be the one to tell him that the Lord still gave the nations unto Nebuchadnezzar King of Babylon and would make for them a yoke of Iron.  It’s interesting the significance of the yoke of iron/rod of iron.

Not only that but there are discrepancies in some of the details of the things that were taken from the house of the Lord from 2 Kings 25:13-18 to Jeremiah 53:17-23, like the measurements of the chapitars atop the pillars.   I know it’s long but I will highlight ONLY the sections I am talking about in these two sets of verses:

"And the pillars of brass that were in the house of the Lord, and the bases, and the brasen sea that was in the house of the Lord, did the Chaldees break in pieces, and carried the brass of them to Babylon.

14. And the pots, and the shovels, and the snuffers, and the spoons, and all the vessels of brass wherewith they ministered, took they away.   15. And the firepans, and the bowls, and such things as were of gold, in gold, and of silver, in silver, the captain of the guard took away.

16. The two pillars, one sea, and the bases which Solomon had made for the house of the Lord; the brass of all these vessels was without weight.   17. The height of the one pillar was eighteen cubits, and the chapiter upon it was brass: and the height of the chapiter three cubits; and the wreathen work, and pomegranates upon the chapiter round about, all of brass: and like unto these had the second pillar with wreathen work.

18. And the captain of the guard took Seraiah the chief priest, and Zephaniah the second priest, and the three keepers of the door:"

"Also the pillars of brass that were in the house of the Lord, and the bases, and the brasen sea that was in the house of the Lord, the Chaldeans brake, and carried all the brass of them to Babylon.   18. The caldrons also, and the shovels, and the snuffers, and the bowls, and the spoons, and all the vessels of brass wherewith they ministered, took they away.

19. And the basons, and the firepans, and the bowls, and the caldrons, and the candlesticks, and the spoons, and the cups; that which was of gold in gold, and that which was of silver in silver, took the captain of the guard away.   20. The two pillars, one sea, and twelve brasen bulls that were under the bases, which king Solomon had made in the house of the Lord: the brass of all these vessels was without weight.

21. And concerning the pillars, the height of one pillar was eighteen cubits; and a fillet of twelve cubits did compass it; and the thickness thereof was four fingers: it was hollow.   22. And a chapiter of brass was upon it; and the height of one chapiter was five cubits, with network and pomegranates upon the chapiters round about, all of brass. The second pillar also and the pomegranates were like unto these.

23. And there were ninety and six pomegranates on a side; and all the pomegranates upon the network were an hundred round about."

The pillars, the brazen sea and the bases are the same in both 2 Kings 25 and Jeremiah 52.  It is the same stuff through most of the description in both sets of verses except when we get down to the description of the length of the chapiters around the pillar, and the description of one pillar as “hollow”.  In 2 Kings 25 the “chapiter” is three cubits.  In Jeremiah 52 it is five cubits . . .

Are there two different temples?  Or are they talking about this?

DNA – 3”/5” each side


In 1 Kings 7, it begins with Solomon finishing his own house, the house of the forest of Lebanon, then he seeks out Hiram of Tyre.  Hiram is described as a widow’s son of the tribe of Naphtali who was skilled and cunning in the workings of brass.  This starts in verse 13 (chapter 7, verse 13).  Remember we discussed in the article “Felling The Walls of Jericho” that the “city of Adam near Zaratan…” [Saratan-Plumb . . . plumbline?] that Zaratan was where Hiram, King of Tyrus/Tyre obtained the brass that he worked into these vessels in Solomon’s house of the Lord.  This is in 1 Kings 7:45-46.

Before we get to that in the same chapter, the description of the pillars and the chapitars reads like this:

"For he cast two pillars of brass, of eighteen cubits high apiece: and a line of twelve cubits did compass either of them about.   16. And he made two chapiters of molten brass, to set upon the tops of the pillars: the height of the one chapiter was five cubits, and the height of the other chapiter was five cubits:   17. And nets of checker work, and wreaths of chain work, for the chapiters which were upon the top of the pillars; seven for the one chapiter, and seven for the other chapiter.

21. And he set up the pillars in the porch of the temple: and he set up the right pillar, and called the name thereof Jachin: and he set up the left pillar, and called the name thereof Boaz.”

Question:  How did the height of one chapiter remain five cubits in Jeremiah 52 while the one mentioned in 2 Kings 25 was only three cubits?   Both chapiters started out being five cubits in 1 Kings 7.  What happened?

Second Question:  In both 2 Kings 25 and Jeremiah 52 all the brass;  ALL the vessels of brass is said to have been “without weight”.

How is that possible?

Is this further verification of a “straight” and “even” “pillar”.  Iniquity means “uneven justice or injustice”.  King Hiram is condemned by God in Ezekiel 28.  The same spirit is in Babylon in Isaiah 14.

"6. Therefore thus saith the Lord God; Because thou hast set thine heart as the heart of God;   7. Behold, therefore I will bring strangers upon thee, the terrible of the nations: and they shall draw their swords against the beauty of thy wisdom, and they shall defile thy brightness.

8. They shall bring thee down to the pit, and thou shalt die the deaths of them that are slain in the midst of the seas.   9. Wilt thou yet say before him that slayeth thee, I am God? but thou shalt be a man, and no God, in the hand of him that slayeth thee.

Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus saith the Lord God; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty.   13. Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created.

14. Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire.   15. Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee."

"How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!   13. For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:   14. I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High."

This also answers the question of the two names connected to the building of the foundation of the second temple – Sheshbazzar in Ezra 5:16 and Zerubbabel in Zechariah 4:9.  Zerubbabel means “seed of Babylon” or “sown in Babylon”.

"shesh-baz'-ar (shesh-batstsar or sheshbatstsar): Sheshbazzar is the Hebrew or Aramaic form of the Babylonian Shamash-aba-ucur, or Shamash-bana-ucur: "Oh Shamash, protect the father." - Source, Biblehub.com/definitions

Protect the Father - Further explanation on that site to determine if Sheshbazzar was indeed or not the same person as Zerubbabel are interesting:

"It is possible that the full name was Shamash-ban-zeri-Babili-ucur, "Oh Shamash, protect the father (builder) of the seed of Babylon . . . If this latter was the full name, there would be little doubt that Sheshbazzar may have been the same person as Zerubbabel, since the former is called in Ezra 5:14 the governor of Judah, and the latter is called by the same title in Haggai 1:1, 14; Haggai 2:2, 21. It is more probable, however, that Sheshbazzar and Zerubbabel were different persons, and that Sheshbazzar was governor of Judah in the time of Cyrus and Zerubbabel in that of Darius." - Source, Biblehub.com/defintions/


If Sheshbazzar and Zerubbabel are different people, then it is correct to interpret that “everything” taken from temple by Nebuchadnezzar was returned by Sheshbazzar, and that Sheshbazzar is the one who harbored the “Ark of the Covenant”.  Zerubbabel’s name means “seed of/sown in Babylon”. 

There was a temple built with hands, and a temple built without hands.  Zerubbabel’s hands “laid the foundation and his hands shall finish it”, whereas Sheshbazzar “laid the foundation of the house of God . . . since that time it is still in building and yet is not finished”.

There is also the issue of the vessels of the house of the Lord and who was actually given these to take back to Jerusalem.  According to Ezra 1:7-10 it was Sheshbazzar, who was then the prince of Judah and into who's hands Cyrus put the vessels of the house of God.

"Also Cyrus the king brought forth the vessels of the house of the Lord, which Nebuchadnezzar had brought forth out of Jerusalem, and had put them in the house of his gods;   8. Even those did Cyrus king of Persia bring forth by the hand of Mithredath the treasurer, and numbered them unto Sheshbazzar, the prince of Judah.   9. And this is the number of them: thirty chargers of gold, a thousand chargers of silver, nine and twenty knives,"


It stands to reason that Zerubbabel could very well have been the same person, but in spirit, different.  The clue is in the scripture on each:

"Then came the same Sheshbazzar, and laid the foundation of the house of God which is in Jerusalem: and since that time even until now hath it been in building, and yet it is not finished."

"The hands of Zerubbabel have laid the foundation of this house; his hands shall also finish it; and thou shalt know that the Lord of hosts hath sent me unto you."

What if Ron Wyatt was telling the truth, but only what he could tell?  He testifies there were two angels – there are two anointed,  there are two cherubs on the Ark.  Only one of them fell according to Isaiah 14. 

Only three angels are mentioned by name in the Bible:  Gabriel and Michael.  Lucifer is mentioned once.  He is called “Satan” and “Serpent/Dragon/viper” everywhere else.

Gabriel is mentioned four times, twice in Daniel (Daniel 8:16 and 9:21) and twice in Luke , both times in delivering the message to Mary that she would bear God’s son Jesus (Luke 1:19 and Luke 1:26).

Michael is mentioned (as the archangel) once in Jude 1:9; once as the leader of the angels fighting the dragon and his angels in Revelation 12:7, Twice in Daniel chapter 10 as “chief prince” and once in Daniel 12:1 as the end times “great prince” for a total of five mentions.  

We know that Jesus is the Word made flesh (John 1:14) and that the Word is in the beginning with God and IS God (John 1:1-2)

Thanks to the clue the letter of Jude left us in the New Testament, we know that the archangel Michael is the “restrainer”;  He keeps the devil away from the body of Moses.  We learn through 2 Thessalonians 2 that the “restrainer” is the one that is “taken out of the way and that evil is revealed”.  We know from Daniel chapter 10 that Daniel is warned to remember what is written in the scripture of truth; that none that hold with God in these things by “Michael your prince”.  This clues us in to look for ambiguity in the role of Michael in the end times.  In Revelation 12 we are told that the soul of a man child will be sought after by the dragon (to devour him), and that this man child was to rule the nations with a rod of iron (big clue there) and that he is caught up to God and to his throne.

Finally, Jesus himself tells us to remember the prophecies of Daniel concerning the end times and that he who reads “let him understand”.  Obviously this is very important.  Because in Daniel 12:1 Michael is named as the one who stands during a time of trouble, and at that time all God’s people who are written in the Book of Life will be delivered.

Several months back there were several people who “friended” my twitter account that were posting in the name of Christ;  People who had connections to others that were not about Christ.  As I viewed their posts on the newsfeed, I noticed there were several posting about the “Dead Sea Scrolls”.

Please continue reading by clicking here.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.