Jahbulon and Jachin
Is There A Relation?
"And Israel abode in Shittim, and the people
began to commit whoredom with the daughters of Moab. 2. And they called the people unto the
sacrifices of their gods: and the people did eat, and bowed down to their gods.
3. And Israel joined himself unto Baalpeor:
and the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel. 4. And the Lord said unto Moses, Take all the
heads of the people, and hang them up before the Lord against the sun, that the
fierce anger of the Lord may be turned away from Israel. 5. And Moses
said unto the judges of Israel, Slay ye every one his men that were joined unto
Baalpeor."
We covered this in the last topic between
Balaam and the children of Ammon and Moab.
There are a few things over the last couple of blogs that God showed me
a bit more in depth, including the lineage of the children of Israel and why
Balaam is so popular in the Bible as a “destroyer/deceiver of the people/ swallowed
up the people”. His name is
mentioned more throughout the history of the books of the Bible than any other
enemy of Israel save Satan himself.
Satan is mentioned 49 times in the KJV Bible, Lucifer once. Balaam is mentioned 59 times. Add "the devil" to the 50 times Satan and Lucifer are mentioned and we have a closer contest.
In Numbers 25 we learn that somehow,
Balaam is connected to the corruption of Israel, and Israel “joins himself” to
Baalpeor.
We learned from “"In The Company Of Six"”:
"And Israel abode in Shittim, and the people began to commit whoredom
with the daughters of Moab. 2. And they called the people unto
the sacrifices of their gods: and the
people did eat, and bowed
down to their gods.
3. And Israel joined himself unto Baalpeor:
and the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel. 4. And the
Lord said unto Moses, Take all the heads of the people, and hang them up before
the Lord against the sun, that the fierce anger of the Lord may be turned away
from Israel."
Israel joins “Baal-Peor”
in Numbers 25. Who is “Baal-Peor”?
"Baal-peor "lord of the opening," a god of Moab
and Midian"
“Lord of the
opening”? What opening? The Pit? Would this be the “angel of
the pit? They have joined themselves unto the lord of the pit? Note
that “Baal-Peor” is almost identical to “Balaam the son of Beor” in Numbers 22.
Is “Baal” the same as “Balaam”? Did the king of Moab elevate Balaam to the
status of a “god”? According to various
sources listed on Wikipedia, “Ba’al” means “lord”, “husband” or
“owner. Balaam means “destroyer” or
“deceiver” of the people.
Baal as a worshipped deity/person doesn’t appear
in the Bible until Numbers 22:41. Balaam is first introduced in Numbers 22:5. Is there a relation?
The very first reference to “Baal” is in the name
“Baalhanan” in Genesis 36:38. He is the son of Achbor, who reigns Edom in
Saul’s stead. The beginning of that
chapter explains the descendents of Esau and they work their way down to
Baalhanan. A few names you see mentioned
later in the Bible consist of Elphaz, Teman, Amalek, and Korah. Interestingly they are called “Dukes”. It says in verse 31 that there were kings in
Edom before any king reigned in Israel.
Of those kings the first mentioned is Bela, the son of Beor
(Balaam – Numbers 22 is the same). In
the order of reign are Bela, Jobab, Husham, Hadad, Samlah, Saul of Rehoboth,
Baalhanan then Hadar of the city named Pau.
This is Genesis 36:39. We will come across both Baal and Hadar’s
city of Pau.
We know from previous blogs that Balaam was not a
child of Israel/Jacob but of Abraham’s nephew, Lot’s descendents. Lot’s children became the children of Moab and Ammon. Baal came up in Esau’s line which was of
Abraham and Isaac, but of Esau, not Jacob.
Yet Balaam becomes the “stumbling block” put before Israel, getting them
to succumb to temptation with whoredom and riches into joining themselves with
“Lord of the opening” and worshiping the gods of the Moabites and the children
of Ammon – Numbers 22-25”. Names mean
something. Baal ben Beor and Balaam ben
Beor? Were there two who had the same
name and who’s father was of the same name?
Or were these names to identify with who they were spiritually and what
they did?
The Rebellion of Korah
Gainsaying of Core
In Numbers chapter 26 we run into some activity.
"And it came to
pass after the plague, that the Lord
spake unto Moses and unto Eleazar the
son of Aaron the priest, saying, 2.
Take the sum of all the congregation
of the children of Israel, from twenty
years old and upward, throughout their fathers' house, all that are able to go to war in Israel.
3. And Moses and
Eleazar the priest spake with them in
the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho, saying, 4. Take the sum of the people, from twenty
years old and upward; as the Lord
commanded Moses and the children of Israel, which went forth out of the land of Egypt.
5. Reuben, the eldest son of Israel: the children of Reuben; Hanoch, of whom
cometh the family of the Hanochites: of Pallu,
the family of the Palluites:"
And this was the family of Pallu:
"And the sons of Pallu; Eliab.
9 And the sons
of Eliab; Nemuel, and Dathan, and Abiram.
This is that Dathan and Abiram, which were famous
in the congregation, who strove against Moses and against Aaron in the company of Korah, when they strove against the Lord:
10 And the earth opened her mouth, and
swallowed them up together with Korah,
when that company died, what time the fire devoured two hundred and fifty men:
and they became a sign.
11
Notwithstanding the children of Korah
died not."
This rebellion of Korah is mentioned in Jude 1:11, those who perished in
the “gainsaying of Core”. It makes note
that the children of Korah did not die, only Korah and those that rebelled with
him. According to some there are two
Korah’s in the Bible, Duke Korah the son of Adah from Eliphaz (the Temanite)
who is son of Esau (Genesis 36:5 Genesis 36:16). And Korah, grandson of Levi (Exodus 6:21). Both Korah’s along with Esau’s and Levi’s
grandson, Korah were associated with warring against Israel or rebelling.
Numbers 26 after verse 11 mention of the sons of
Simeon of whom Jamin and Jachin are named as sons. Korah was from the family of Levi, Jachin
from the family of Simeon, and Dathan and Abarim who rebelled with Korah from
the family of Pallu under Reuben.
"The sons of Simeon after their families: of
Nemuel, the family of the Nemuelites: of Jamin,
the family of the Jaminites: of Jachin,
the family of the Jachinites:
13. Of Zerah,
the family of the Zarhites: of Shaul, the family of the Shaulites. 14. These are the families of the Simeonites,
twenty and two thousand and two hundred."
In Numbers 26, the last few verses which are 63
through 65, we learn that the first generation will die in the wilderness
because they had disobeyed God, and had worshipped Idols or did not
believe. This included Jachin. None was left that had been counted from
Egypt except for Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun, who
would lead them across a Jordan River on dry ground, and where stones would be
laid for Israel where they lodged in Gilead before they took down the walls of
Jericho.
We stopped at the family of Simeon, who's sons
consisted of Jamin (meaning to the right) and "Jachin" whos name
means either "stands against" or "stands in strength
against". There is no lineage from
Jachin mentioned in the Bible which would testify that Jachin, if he had any
children, did not make it to the Promised Land.
As a matter of fact, none of Simeon’s lineage beyond the seventh
generation down is even mentioned by name.
The first generation out of Egypt were not go into the promised land and
died out. Only their children.
This could be because Christ was not of Simeon’s
line and therefore his lineage was not focused upon – but their storyline does
not continue through the Bible. Yet
Simeon is given a portion of the New Jerusalem in Ezekiel 48, as are the other
tribes, minus Dan.
In Revelation 7:7, Simeon is one of
the tribes (144,000) in which 12,000 are the elect which is 12,000 from each of
the twelve tribes. Those names of the 12
tribes comprise the gates of the city, and the foundation of which the
headstone of the corner is Christ.
These are they that make up the city called New
Jerusalem, and those that also of which the temple consist. The temple is the “house for the Name of the
Lord” – he who bares his name. In Acts,
there is also a prophet among Peter, Paul and Stephen of the apostles named
Simeon who was also called “Niger”, and he taught the people as well:
"Simeon hath declared how God
at the first did visit the Gentiles,
to take out of them a people for his
name."
Jachin, son of Simeon is mentioned first in Genesis 46:10. Jachin is first mentioned in 1 Kings 7:21 as the name of the
right pillar at the front of Solomon’s Temple, and it was also the name of a
priest in 1 Chronicles 9:10 and as late as Nehemiah 11:10 where the name is
last mentioned.
Jachin = to be established or
“he/He (God) will establish)
Boaz = By strength/God establishes
in strength.
I found this paragraph on Boaz interesting:
"The name Boaz literally means By
Strength, and it appears to celebrate man's personal vigor. Personal
strength may truly be a gift, but it, like anything else, should not be revered
too much and certainly not held responsible for anything that was achieved by
God. Whether Solomon named one of his pillars after his great-great-grandfather
or that this is coincidence can not be determined, but note that via Zechariah, YHWH tells Zerubbabel, the restorer of the temple after the return from
Babylon: "Not by might (בחיל) nor by power (בכח), but by My Spirit (ברוחי)" (Zechariah
4:6)." - Source, Abarim Publications
Jachin and Boaz cannot possibly have the same
meanings. There are two pillars for a
reason. They have different meanings, so
I kept digging. Key here also is Zechariah 4:6 – “Not by might nor
by power, but by My Spirit” in reference to “the Word of the Lord to Zerubbabel”. Zechariah if you remember was killed
‘between the temple and the altar’ in Matthew 23:35.
So who is Jachin?
The true character behind the right pillar of Solomon’s Temple is hardly
mentioned in scripture. We know Boaz and
why the left pillar was so named for him.
There are two anointed. Jachin
gives us hardly any clues, but there is this:
The “sanctuary of strength” in Daniel 11:31 is polluted, the same
sanctuary who with its “host” will be trodden in Daniel 8:11-13. Question – what happened to the “pillars” on
9/11?
The Pillars
.jpg)
Destruction of the “Witnesses”
This is what they have planned
.jpg) |
| Isaiah 30:25 |
You are going to learn further verification of the
meaning of the design of this new “One” World Trade Center, further down.
Remember – The end times servant who in Isaiah 52:14-15 we learn will shock
the kings who will see things they were not told, and consider things they had
not heard. This is why the following
chapter in Zechariah is so interesting – and incidentally why he was slain “in
the temple”.
Jackson and Jachin – Really?
Remember from “In the Company Of Six” we learned
that “Jackson” was also rooted in the name “Jackin” or “Jankin”. I went back to the Bible over this.
From “In the Company Of Six”:
--------------------------------------------------
The “surname” of Israel would be the same as “Jacob”. Jacob has also been “profaned”, but you can
always follow the breadcrumb trail to the source.
Jackson -
"is a common surname of English and Scottish
origin. It literally means "son of Jack".
Son of Jack -
Jack -
Jack is thought to harken back to medieval
times as a common derivative of the name John. The nickname has
also been seen as Jackie among men (examples of note: Jackie Gleason; Jackie
Coogan, Jackie Cooper, all of whom were formally named John). This
"Jackie" diminutive of the nickname Jack is thought by some to have hailed from the
earlier "Jackin" (born of the appellation Jankin).[3][4]
Alternatively it may be derived from the name Jacques, which is the French form
of the name Jacob.[3] There is also a theory that it is Celtic in origin, meaning "Healthy, Strong, Full of
Vital Energy".
Not only is “Jacob” renamed “Israel” evolved into “Jack” it has also in common with “Jackin” or Biblically spelled “Jachin” as in “Jachin and Boaz”. Now you know who comprises the other half of the pillars of Solomon’s
Temple, and also that of the “strongtower” and the “sanctuary of strength” and Moses “Natural Force” so coveted by Satan in Jude 1:9.
--------------------------------------------------
Jachin and Boaz are the pillars of the porch of
Solomon’s temple. Boaz was the kinsman
of Naomi’s husband but Ruth herself was a Moabite, who had married one of
Naomi’s sons (who also died). Boaz
married Ruth so that the inheritance that would have been to Naomi’s
deceased husband, Elimelech would not be lost.
From Ruth came Obed, the father of Jesse which was the father of David –
and so began the line from which Jesus would be made “the Word Made Flesh”,
from his mother Mary.
Each of the sons brought to glory, (so that the
captain of our salvation is made perfect through sufferings) contributed to a
stone or a pillar in the temple that became the one who would rise up from the
dead.
Solomon named the pillars of which the secret
would be kept – The secrets of “Freemasonry” lie within “Jachin and Boaz”. Here is one “version” of what the pillars
mean:
Jachin and Boaz - the Freemason Story
They say Jachin means:
"In all the languages of the Semitic stock the letters J and Y are
interchangeable, as we see in the modern Arabic "Yakub" for
"Jacob" and the old Hebrew "Yaveh" for "Jehovah."
This gives us the form "Yachin," which at once reveals the enigma.
The word Yak signifies "one"; and the termination "hi," or
"hin," is an intensitive which may be rendered in English by
"only." Thus the word "Jachin" resolves itself into the
words "one only," the all-embracing Unity." - Source,
Sacred Texts
Humorous now is the whole “unity” sales pitch by
the “New Age” gurus, you get desensitized to this after a while. Understand that they are speaking from a
“Freemason” mindset as if it is a good thing and the god of Freemasonry hasn’t
already been exposed.
God has created some very surprising clues to some
long guarded secrets, which He wanted us to know but were hidden from us
because of our distance from Him; and not all things, but those which He put in
the book to be remembered when He opened our eyes.
Those that sought to abuse this knowledge and shut
up that portion of the Kingdom, greedily guarding it and distributing it for
gain now pretend to give you what they took from you in the first place; the
offspring of they who left their first habitation to teach men they could
become gods as they ushered them into bondage and death.
On that same web site, they define Boaz:
Boaz means:
"The meaning of Boaz is
clearly seen in the book of Ruth. There Boaz appears as the kinsman exercising the right of pre-emption
so familiar to those versed in Oriental
law--a right which has for its
purpose the maintenance of the Family as the social unit. According to this
widely-spread custom, the purchaser, who is not a member of the family, buys
the property subject to the right of kinsmen within certain degrees to purchase
it back, and so bring it once more into the family to which it originally
belonged. " - Source, Sacred Texts
He speaks of Oriental law in relation to the
“family as the social unit”. In the
example in the story of Boaz and Ruth.
Boaz is in reverence to Ruth’s dedication to Naomi and more so when Ruth
asks Boaz to marry her so that the line of Naomi’s husband “Elimelech” does not
lose its inheritance. Boaz tells her
that if none of her closer kinsmen would marry her, then he would. The only kinsmen qualified who was closer in
relation to Naomi’s deceased husband declined because Ruth was a Moabite, so
Boaz married her to continue the line to the Christ.
Remember the “One World Trade Center” –
This is what they have planned
What does this represent besides the “mingling”?
"And whereas thou
sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they
shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one
to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay."
Unity – the message “We’re all ONE”.
"The former is Unity of Being;
the latter, Unity of Intention: and
the principle of this Dual-Unity is
well illustrated by the story of Boaz.
The whole story proceeds on the idea of
the Family as the social unit, the root-conception of all Oriental law, and if we consider the
Family in this light, we shall see how
exactly it embodies the two-fold idea of Jachin and Boaz, unity of Being
and unity of Thought.
The Family forms a unit because all the members proceed from a common
progenitor, and are thus all of one blood; but, although this gives them a
natural unity of Being of which they cannot divest themselves, it is not enough
in itself to make them a united family, as unfortunately experience too often
shows. Something more is wanted, and that something is Love. There must be a personal union brought
about by sympathetic Thought to complete the natural union resulting from
birth. The inherent unity must be expressed by the Individual volition of each
member, and thus the Family becomes the ideally perfect social unit; a truth to
which St. Paul alludes when he calls God the Father from Whom every family in
heaven and on earth is named. " - Source, Sacred Texts
Christ already did this. This is why God commanded to love Him, and
Jesus revealed to Love God first, putting nothing before Him. They are teaching reverence of a family unit,
which if you have been keeping up with our notes on Mormon Doctrine, is the
basis of their “sealing ceremony” in which you are “sealed to your family” for
“eternity.
There is no Biblical basis for a “sealing”
ceremony, nor is there “baptism of the dead”.
The Bible teaches that through CHRIST are we one, not through mental
bondage to another entity. We are warned
in Revelation –
"And the ten
horns which thou sawest are ten kings,
which have received no kingdom as
yet; but receive power as kings one hour
with the beast.
13. These have one mind, and shall give their
power and strength unto the beast.
14. These shall make war with
the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King
of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful."
You can become “One” through Christ, to God, or
you can become “One” by giving your soul to other gods for gain. Some have sadly already chosen.
From Abarim Publications
"According to Spiros Zodhiates' The Complete Word Study Dictionary New Testament, the name Jachin gave rise to the name Achim of Matthew 1:14."
- Source, AbarimPublications.com
Let’s look at this in context, Matthew 1:12-15.
"And after they were brought to Babylon,
Jechonias begat Salathiel; and
Salathiel begat Zorobabel; 13. And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor;
14. And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud; 15. And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan;
and Matthan begat Jacob; 16. And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary,
of whom was born Jesus, who is
called Christ."
This is the only place Achim is mentioned in the
Bible. There is no evidence that Achim
is of Jachin or that he was named for Jachin, but his mention is just as
brief.
It is important to note that Joseph, husband of
Mary, was not Jesus’ biological father.
The lineage is recited from Jesus, back in Luke 3:22-38 all the way back to
Adam. Reading through this you see
Zorobabel which is the same as Zerubbabel.
In Luke 3, we see in parenthesis Jesus (as was supposed) the son of
Joseph. So by this we know they are
reciting Mary’s line and not Joseph’s.
Achim shows up in Joseph’s lineage in Matthew 1. He does not show up in Luke 3 for Mary’s
line.
The lineage for Mary’s line and Joseph’s line is
the same until you get to David’s sons King Solomon and Nathan/ Matthew 1:6 and Luke 3:31 respectively. So from Solomon on, Joseph’s line was not
connected to Christ until possibly the enigma between Zerubbabel and his
father. We discussed Zerubbabel here in several parts.
Achim was the name of Eddie
Murphy's character in "Coming to America" (to find his bride). It was spelled “Akeem” in the movie. Perhaps another hint such as the missing
"J" sound from words uttered by Sardom Numpsa in "The Golden Child",
another Murphy film (covered toward the bottom of “Guess Where YahWeh Came From”.
"The name Jachin comes from the verb כון (kun), meaning to be established:
The name Jachin is derived from a future form of כון (kun). For a meaning of the name Jachin, Jones'
Dictionary of Old Testament Proper Names proposes
He Will Give Certainty or He Will
Establish. NOBSE Study Bible Name List reads He (God) Establishes." - Source, AbarimPublications.com
Abarim Publications gives almost the same meaning
for Jachin as they do Boaz. Biblically
there isn’t much to go on in the manner of meaning for Jachin. Is Jachin the same as “Achim”?
"Achim
–
2) Or the name Achim may come
from the Hebrew verb קום (qum) meaning to rise up or stand:
The root-verb קום (qum) generally means
to rise up or stand. It's used in all the expected ways,
This verb is used when items are set up (idols - Leviticus 26:1), or when one assumes an office or position:
that of leader (Genesis 37:7), prophet (Deuteronomy 34:10), judge (Judges
10:1). Thus this verb also used when a
covenant is established (Exodus 6:4).
t's unclear from which verb Achim
comes, but should we consider it to come from כון, Achim would mean something
like Established. Should we reckon Achim to come from קום, it would mean
Raised Up." - source, AbarimPublications
Several of these examples describe the end times
servant: “to rise up or stand” – Ecclesiastes 4:14-15 and Daniel 12:1; “one assumes office or
position” again Ecclesiastes 4, Revelation 2:27-28, Revelation 12:5, 1 Thessalonians 4:16; and “when a
covenant is established” in Daniel 9:27, Daniel 11:22, Malachi 3:1, Hebrews 8:9 and many more examples
which ascribe to both Christ and he who will counterfeit him.
The storyline for Freemason apologists which
promote the Occultic versions, the religion of the Jews and Mormon, Jehovah’s
Witnesses and other premillennial doctrine begins to rear its head such as the
explanation from “Gnostic Warrior”:
"The two pillars of Boaz and
Jachin were two copper, brass or bronze pillars which stood in the porch of
Solomon’s Temple, the first Temple in Jerusalem. Boaz
stood on the left and Jachin
(‘founding’, Tiberian Hebrew יָכִין Yāḵîn) stood on the right which we can see id detailed in 2
Chronicles 3:17 – “He (HiRam Abiff) erected the pillars in the front of the temple, one to
the south and one to the north. The one to
the south he named Jakin and the one
to the north Boaz.” In Revelation
3:12 we will find the promises that were made to Boaz and
Jachin.” – Source, Gnostic Warrior
They translate “Yakin” as “founding”. They also credit their Freemason “Hiram
Abiff” (The Mason’s Hiram) with the Hiram craftsman in Tyre (1 Kings 7:13-14) who was called
“King Hiram of Tyre” (1 Kings 5:1) whom Solomon contacted
to build the temple. There is also the
“King of Tyrus” who is associated with Satan/Lucifer in Ezekiel 28.
He mentions the “promises made to Jachin and Boaz”
in Revelation 3:12. Let’s look at the
scripture:
"Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of
my God, and he shall go
no more out: and I will write upon
him the name of my God, and the name
of the city of my God, which is new
Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name."
The writer is right in that this scripture
references that “pillar”. Also mentioned
is that “he will go no more out”.
Remember this is Christ himself giving the revelation to John. It is Christ who also tells John to write to
the church in Pergamos, this revelation about the same one who ‘overcomes’:
"And he that overcometh,
and keepeth my works unto the end, to
him will I give power over the nations:
27. And he shall rule them with a rod of iron;
as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father. 28. And
I will give him the morning star."
In Revelation 12 we are told who this is, as well
as other scripture we have researched:
"And his tail
drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and
the dragon stood before the woman
which was ready to be delivered, for to
devour her child as soon as it was born.
5. And she brought forth a man
child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to
his throne.
6. And the woman
fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they
should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days. 7. And there
was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and
the dragon fought and his angels,"
Jachin is where the road splits, as it does with
Michael in those teaching the error.
Jachin is the pillar of the end times servant, NOT
the “founding” as those who seek to deceive.
Jachin is the fallen cherub, who will be destroyed
with the brightness of his coming.
Jachin is the one who is the beast who was, is not
yet is. Jachin is he who’s soul is not
upright in him but the just shall live by his faith.
Jachin is the sanctuary who will be trodden, and
polluted, but also the sanctuary who will be cleansed because he will
overcome. Remember Jesus told us that
the son of man returns after the tribulation.
Paul told us that the man of sin is revealed first, the son of
perdition. The liars and those who
worship the star of their god, Moloch will try to convince you of a millennial
reign that has not happened yet. They
will convince you that this “kingdom” will be on this earth before the
resurrection and before any restoration of God’s Word within His Creation.
They stated that “Jachin” was the “Tiberian Hebrew” “Yakin” (So says the Masoretic
“scholars”). The link shows in the side
bar a snippet of the alleged “Aleppo Codex” – the problem with this “snippet”
is that it is written in square script and therefore is not the Aleppo Codex
but the rewritten one in the possession of Israel, the “state of”. It’s a lie for which the Christians of Syria
are now suffering. Here is what “Ya’kin”
is, in the Himalayas. You will recognize
the reference and it’s symbol:
1.
(Zool.) A large Asiatic antelope (Budorcas taxicolor) native of the higher
parts of the Himalayas and other
lofty mountains. Its head and neck resemble
those of the ox, and its tail is like
that of the goat. Called also budorcas." - Source, Freedictionary.com
This is what they look like
They were listed on some sites as “Takin” as
well. On a side note, there is an
American-Israeli screen writer who’s parents named him after the pillars – if
“Yakin” is what the Freemason’s say it is.
"Boaz Yakin (born 1966) American screenwriter and
film director (director “Remember the Titans”) - Source, Translation Babylon.com
English
words used for the Turkish word Yakin -
"adjacent, akin, akin to, approximate, at hand, by, close, close-range,
close to, connate, connected, connection, connexion, contiguous, convenient,
familiar, handy, hard, hard by, immediate, imminent, inseparable, intimate,"
and others similar in meaning"
Since Syriac was spoken on parts of Southern
Turkey at one time, the “Hebrew” meaning for “Jachin” or the “other” word
“Yakin” kind of connects to the Abarim Publications meaning for “Jachin” with
“akin, connected, familiar, inseparable” and some of the others. I believe Jachin is Jachin and Yakin is a
result of the “invented” Hebrew re-written in Babylon during the exile. The “J” sound in early Semitic languages was
represented by the Yod/Yud. The
Babylonian Jews changed it. That means
Jachin has always been Jachin, Jesus has always been Jesus and Jehovah has
always been Jehovah.
One more error on that particular “Gnostic
Warrior” web site I would like to address:
“Who was the bloodline and tribe
of Jachin?
In Nehemiah 11:10 we find our answer; “From the priests: Jedaiah; the
son of Joiarib; Jakin; In 1 Chron. ix. 10 we find ‘Jedaiah, and Jehoiarib, Jachin.’ As these three are the names of
well-known priestly houses (cf. 1 Chron. xxiv. 7, Jehoiarib the first, Jedaiah the second, Jachin the one and twentieth in the
twenty-four). Then when you look in the bible, you will find that the name Jedidiah is mentioned only once in
the Bible, and that it is the name
which the prophet Nathan gave to Solomon (2
Samuel 12:25). So, the pillar of Jachin would
also represent the blood line of King Solomon, but an apparent different one
than that of Boaz and the Tribe of Judah. Meaning King Solomon had two children
that would apparently be split into two different tribes that are now
represented in Freemasonry as the Pillars of Boaz and Jachin.” –
Source, Gnostic Warrior
Is Nathan the son of David in 2 Samuel 5:14 the same as the
prophet sent to David in 2 Samuel 12? Nathan was the older brother of Solomon.
They surmise that the priest “Jachin” is the
bloodline of Solomon because of another priest “Jedaiah” had a similar name to
that which Prophet Nathan gave Solomon when he was born. This does not make them of Solomon. It’s at the very least disingenuous and seeks
to undermine the divinity of Christ.
Their error (or deception since they have the same access to the Bible
as you and I) shows up below:
“It was King David’s most
important son, Solomon as I mentioned above was named Jedidiah that is also pronounced as Bedaiah, which means a “servant of Yah or Jehovah.” He was the Israelite exile who had took a foreign
woman. A son of Bani who had married a “strange wife” (Ezra 10:35).
Based on my research above, it is clear to me that Boaz
represent the bloodline of King David through Solomon to Jesus Christ that Jesus would represent the complete
succession of blood and royalty from King David down through King Solomon to
Jesus. The blood line of Jachin would represent the split o the Davidic blood line in
which Davids son, King Solomon had
intermarried with a “new bloodline” that we clearly see in Ezra 10:35 where Solomon is referred to the a
son of Bani who had married a “strange wife”
and this is now represented in Jachin. Boaz being the Old Testament
blood lines and Jachin being the New Testament blood lines.” –
Source, Gnosticwarrior.com
First there is NO “Bedaiah” in the Bible. There IS a Benaiah who is the son of Jehoiada
and was among the men who sided with David against Adonijah. (Note Adonai is the
name the Jews give “God” and also shows up in many of the newer English
versions of the Bible – Adonijah revolted against David as Nathan told David
God said would occur because he sinned and murdered Uriah).
I agree that the pillars could represent the “Old”
and “New Testament” seed, but not
through Solomon for both of them.
The “researcher” then seeks to completely cut out
the lineage of Nathan in the bloodline of Jesus, by inserting the “fork in the
road” through this priest, who was not even related in the direct bloodline to
Solomon. Scripture testifies to both
lineages of Jesus revealing the false doctrines of Freemasonry. The “fork in the road” is between Nathan, which
bloodline Jesus’ mother Mary came, and Solomon which Jesus’ non-biological
father came.
Jesus’ ONLY father was God in heaven. This is where the Freemason’s and those
religions that adhere to their doctrine seek to deceive. Jesus was fathered from God, the Holy Ghost,
NOT Joseph, of tainted seed.
Who is Jachin?
What does the pillar named Jachin represent?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.