Jahbulon and Jachin
Is There A Relation?
"And Israel abode in Shittim, and the people began to commit whoredom with the daughters of Moab. 2. And they called the people unto the sacrifices of their gods: and the people did eat, and bowed down to their gods.
3. And Israel joined himself unto Baalpeor: and the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel. 4. And the Lord said unto Moses, Take all the heads of the people, and hang them up before the Lord against the sun, that the fierce anger of the Lord may be turned away from Israel. 5. And Moses said unto the judges of Israel, Slay ye every one his men that were joined unto Baalpeor."
We covered this in the last topic between Balaam and the children of Ammon and Moab. There are a few things over the last couple of blogs that God showed me a bit more in depth, including the lineage of the children of Israel and why Balaam is so popular in the Bible as a “destroyer/deceiver of the people/ swallowed up the people”. His name is mentioned more throughout the history of the books of the Bible than any other enemy of Israel save Satan himself.
Satan is mentioned 49 times in the KJV Bible, Lucifer once. Balaam is mentioned 59 times. Add "the devil" to the 50 times Satan and Lucifer are mentioned and we have a closer contest.
In Numbers 25 we learn that somehow, Balaam is connected to the corruption of Israel, and Israel “joins himself” to Baalpeor.
We learned from “"In The Company Of Six"”:
Is “Baal” the same as “Balaam”? Did the king of Moab elevate Balaam to the status of a “god”? According to various sources listed on Wikipedia, “Ba’al” means “lord”, “husband” or “owner. Balaam means “destroyer” or “deceiver” of the people.
Baal as a worshipped deity/person doesn’t appear in the Bible until Numbers 22:41. Balaam is first introduced in Numbers 22:5. Is there a relation?
The very first reference to “Baal” is in the name “Baalhanan” in Genesis 36:38. He is the son of Achbor, who reigns Edom in Saul’s stead. The beginning of that chapter explains the descendents of Esau and they work their way down to Baalhanan. A few names you see mentioned later in the Bible consist of Elphaz, Teman, Amalek, and Korah. Interestingly they are called “Dukes”. It says in verse 31 that there were kings in Edom before any king reigned in Israel. Of those kings the first mentioned is Bela, the son of Beor (Balaam – Numbers 22 is the same). In the order of reign are Bela, Jobab, Husham, Hadad, Samlah, Saul of Rehoboth, Baalhanan then Hadar of the city named Pau. This is Genesis 36:39. We will come across both Baal and Hadar’s city of Pau.
We know from previous blogs that Balaam was not a child of Israel/Jacob but of Abraham’s nephew, Lot’s descendents. Lot’s children became the children of Moab and Ammon. Baal came up in Esau’s line which was of Abraham and Isaac, but of Esau, not Jacob. Yet Balaam becomes the “stumbling block” put before Israel, getting them to succumb to temptation with whoredom and riches into joining themselves with “Lord of the opening” and worshiping the gods of the Moabites and the children of Ammon – Numbers 22-25”. Names mean something. Baal ben Beor and Balaam ben Beor? Were there two who had the same name and who’s father was of the same name? Or were these names to identify with who they were spiritually and what they did?
The Rebellion of Korah
Gainsaying of Core
In Numbers chapter 26 we run into some activity.
"And it came to pass after the plague, that the Lord spake unto Moses and unto Eleazar the son of Aaron the priest, saying, 2. Take the sum of all the congregation of the children of Israel, from twenty years old and upward, throughout their fathers' house, all that are able to go to war in Israel.
3. And Moses and Eleazar the priest spake with them in the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho, saying, 4. Take the sum of the people, from twenty years old and upward; as the Lord commanded Moses and the children of Israel, which went forth out of the land of Egypt.
5. Reuben, the eldest son of Israel: the children of Reuben; Hanoch, of whom cometh the family of the Hanochites: of Pallu, the family of the Palluites:"
And this was the family of Pallu:
"And the sons of Pallu; Eliab.
9 And the sons of Eliab; Nemuel, and Dathan, and Abiram. This is that Dathan and Abiram, which were famous in the congregation, who strove against Moses and against Aaron in the company of Korah, when they strove against the Lord:
10 And the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed them up together with Korah, when that company died, what time the fire devoured two hundred and fifty men: and they became a sign.
11 Notwithstanding the children of Korah died not."
This rebellion of Korah is mentioned in Jude 1:11, those who perished in the “gainsaying of Core”. It makes note that the children of Korah did not die, only Korah and those that rebelled with him. According to some there are two Korah’s in the Bible, Duke Korah the son of Adah from Eliphaz (the Temanite) who is son of Esau (Genesis 36:5 Genesis 36:16). And Korah, grandson of Levi (Exodus 6:21). Both Korah’s along with Esau’s and Levi’s grandson, Korah were associated with warring against Israel or rebelling.
Numbers 26 after verse 11 mention of the sons of Simeon of whom Jamin and Jachin are named as sons. Korah was from the family of Levi, Jachin from the family of Simeon, and Dathan and Abarim who rebelled with Korah from the family of Pallu under Reuben.
"The sons of Simeon after their families: of Nemuel, the family of the Nemuelites: of Jamin, the family of the Jaminites: of Jachin, the family of the Jachinites:
13. Of Zerah, the family of the Zarhites: of Shaul, the family of the Shaulites. 14. These are the families of the Simeonites, twenty and two thousand and two hundred."
In Numbers 26, the last few verses which are 63 through 65, we learn that the first generation will die in the wilderness because they had disobeyed God, and had worshipped Idols or did not believe. This included Jachin. None was left that had been counted from Egypt except for Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun, who would lead them across a Jordan River on dry ground, and where stones would be laid for Israel where they lodged in Gilead before they took down the walls of Jericho.
We stopped at the family of Simeon, who's sons consisted of Jamin (meaning to the right) and "Jachin" whos name means either "stands against" or "stands in strength against". There is no lineage from Jachin mentioned in the Bible which would testify that Jachin, if he had any children, did not make it to the Promised Land. As a matter of fact, none of Simeon’s lineage beyond the seventh generation down is even mentioned by name. The first generation out of Egypt were not go into the promised land and died out. Only their children.
This could be because Christ was not of Simeon’s line and therefore his lineage was not focused upon – but their storyline does not continue through the Bible. Yet Simeon is given a portion of the New Jerusalem in Ezekiel 48, as are the other tribes, minus Dan.
In Revelation 7:7, Simeon is one of the tribes (144,000) in which 12,000 are the elect which is 12,000 from each of the twelve tribes. Those names of the 12 tribes comprise the gates of the city, and the foundation of which the headstone of the corner is Christ.
These are they that make up the city called New Jerusalem, and those that also of which the temple consist. The temple is the “house for the Name of the Lord” – he who bares his name. In Acts, there is also a prophet among Peter, Paul and Stephen of the apostles named Simeon who was also called “Niger”, and he taught the people as well:
"Simeon hath declared how God at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name."
Jachin, son of Simeon is mentioned first in Genesis 46:10. Jachin is first mentioned in 1 Kings 7:21 as the name of the right pillar at the front of Solomon’s Temple, and it was also the name of a priest in 1 Chronicles 9:10 and as late as Nehemiah 11:10 where the name is last mentioned.
Jachin = to be established or “he/He (God) will establish)
Boaz = By strength/God establishes in strength.
I found this paragraph on Boaz interesting:
Jachin and Boaz cannot possibly have the same meanings. There are two pillars for a reason. They have different meanings, so I kept digging. Key here also is Zechariah 4:6 – “Not by might nor by power, but by My Spirit” in reference to “the Word of the Lord to Zerubbabel”. Zechariah if you remember was killed ‘between the temple and the altar’ in Matthew 23:35.
So who is Jachin? The true character behind the right pillar of Solomon’s Temple is hardly mentioned in scripture. We know Boaz and why the left pillar was so named for him. There are two anointed. Jachin gives us hardly any clues, but there is this:
The “sanctuary of strength” in Daniel 11:31 is polluted, the same sanctuary who with its “host” will be trodden in Daniel 8:11-13. Question – what happened to the “pillars” on 9/11?
Destruction of the “Witnesses”
This is what they have planned
You are going to learn further verification of the meaning of the design of this new “One” World Trade Center, further down.
Remember – The end times servant who in Isaiah 52:14-15 we learn will shock the kings who will see things they were not told, and consider things they had not heard. This is why the following chapter in Zechariah is so interesting – and incidentally why he was slain “in the temple”.
Jackson and Jachin – Really?
Remember from “In the Company Of Six” we learned that “Jackson” was also rooted in the name “Jackin” or “Jankin”. I went back to the Bible over this.
From “In the Company Of Six”:
The “surname” of Israel would be the same as “Jacob”. Jacob has also been “profaned”, but you can always follow the breadcrumb trail to the source.
Son of Jack -
Not only is “Jacob” renamed “Israel” evolved into “Jack” it has also in common with “Jackin” or Biblically spelled “Jachin” as in “Jachin and Boaz”. Now you know who comprises the other half of the pillars of Solomon’s Temple, and also that of the “strongtower” and the “sanctuary of strength” and Moses “Natural Force” so coveted by Satan in Jude 1:9.
Jachin and Boaz are the pillars of the porch of Solomon’s temple. Boaz was the kinsman of Naomi’s husband but Ruth herself was a Moabite, who had married one of Naomi’s sons (who also died). Boaz married Ruth so that the inheritance that would have been to Naomi’s deceased husband, Elimelech would not be lost. From Ruth came Obed, the father of Jesse which was the father of David – and so began the line from which Jesus would be made “the Word Made Flesh”, from his mother Mary.
Each of the sons brought to glory, (so that the captain of our salvation is made perfect through sufferings) contributed to a stone or a pillar in the temple that became the one who would rise up from the dead.
Solomon named the pillars of which the secret would be kept – The secrets of “Freemasonry” lie within “Jachin and Boaz”. Here is one “version” of what the pillars mean:
Jachin and Boaz - the Freemason Story
They say Jachin means:
Humorous now is the whole “unity” sales pitch by the “New Age” gurus, you get desensitized to this after a while. Understand that they are speaking from a “Freemason” mindset as if it is a good thing and the god of Freemasonry hasn’t already been exposed.
God has created some very surprising clues to some long guarded secrets, which He wanted us to know but were hidden from us because of our distance from Him; and not all things, but those which He put in the book to be remembered when He opened our eyes.
Those that sought to abuse this knowledge and shut up that portion of the Kingdom, greedily guarding it and distributing it for gain now pretend to give you what they took from you in the first place; the offspring of they who left their first habitation to teach men they could become gods as they ushered them into bondage and death.
On that same web site, they define Boaz:
He speaks of Oriental law in relation to the “family as the social unit”. In the example in the story of Boaz and Ruth. Boaz is in reverence to Ruth’s dedication to Naomi and more so when Ruth asks Boaz to marry her so that the line of Naomi’s husband “Elimelech” does not lose its inheritance. Boaz tells her that if none of her closer kinsmen would marry her, then he would. The only kinsmen qualified who was closer in relation to Naomi’s deceased husband declined because Ruth was a Moabite, so Boaz married her to continue the line to the Christ.
Remember the “One World Trade Center” –
This is what they have planned
What does this represent besides the “mingling”?
"And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay."
Unity – the message “We’re all ONE”.
Christ already did this. This is why God commanded to love Him, and Jesus revealed to Love God first, putting nothing before Him. They are teaching reverence of a family unit, which if you have been keeping up with our notes on Mormon Doctrine, is the basis of their “sealing ceremony” in which you are “sealed to your family” for “eternity.
There is no Biblical basis for a “sealing” ceremony, nor is there “baptism of the dead”. The Bible teaches that through CHRIST are we one, not through mental bondage to another entity. We are warned in Revelation –
"And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.
13. These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast. 14. These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful."
You can become “One” through Christ, to God, or you can become “One” by giving your soul to other gods for gain. Some have sadly already chosen.
From Abarim Publications
Let’s look at this in context, Matthew 1:12-15.
"And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel; 13. And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor;
14. And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud; 15. And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob; 16. And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ."
This is the only place Achim is mentioned in the Bible. There is no evidence that Achim is of Jachin or that he was named for Jachin, but his mention is just as brief.
It is important to note that Joseph, husband of Mary, was not Jesus’ biological father. The lineage is recited from Jesus, back in Luke 3:22-38 all the way back to Adam. Reading through this you see Zorobabel which is the same as Zerubbabel. In Luke 3, we see in parenthesis Jesus (as was supposed) the son of Joseph. So by this we know they are reciting Mary’s line and not Joseph’s. Achim shows up in Joseph’s lineage in Matthew 1. He does not show up in Luke 3 for Mary’s line.
The lineage for Mary’s line and Joseph’s line is the same until you get to David’s sons King Solomon and Nathan/ Matthew 1:6 and Luke 3:31 respectively. So from Solomon on, Joseph’s line was not connected to Christ until possibly the enigma between Zerubbabel and his father. We discussed Zerubbabel here in several parts.
Achim was the name of Eddie Murphy's character in "Coming to America" (to find his bride). It was spelled “Akeem” in the movie. Perhaps another hint such as the missing "J" sound from words uttered by Sardom Numpsa in "The Golden Child", another Murphy film (covered toward the bottom of “Guess Where YahWeh Came From”.
Abarim Publications gives almost the same meaning for Jachin as they do Boaz. Biblically there isn’t much to go on in the manner of meaning for Jachin. Is Jachin the same as “Achim”?
Several of these examples describe the end times servant: “to rise up or stand” – Ecclesiastes 4:14-15 and Daniel 12:1; “one assumes office or position” again Ecclesiastes 4, Revelation 2:27-28, Revelation 12:5, 1 Thessalonians 4:16; and “when a covenant is established” in Daniel 9:27, Daniel 11:22, Malachi 3:1, Hebrews 8:9 and many more examples which ascribe to both Christ and he who will counterfeit him.
The storyline for Freemason apologists which promote the Occultic versions, the religion of the Jews and Mormon, Jehovah’s Witnesses and other premillennial doctrine begins to rear its head such as the explanation from “Gnostic Warrior”:
They translate “Yakin” as “founding”. They also credit their Freemason “Hiram Abiff” (The Mason’s Hiram) with the Hiram craftsman in Tyre (1 Kings 7:13-14) who was called “King Hiram of Tyre” (1 Kings 5:1) whom Solomon contacted to build the temple. There is also the “King of Tyrus” who is associated with Satan/Lucifer in Ezekiel 28.
He mentions the “promises made to Jachin and Boaz” in Revelation 3:12. Let’s look at the scripture:
"Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name."
The writer is right in that this scripture references that “pillar”. Also mentioned is that “he will go no more out”. Remember this is Christ himself giving the revelation to John. It is Christ who also tells John to write to the church in Pergamos, this revelation about the same one who ‘overcomes’:
"And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:
27. And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father. 28. And I will give him the morning star."
In Revelation 12 we are told who this is, as well as other scripture we have researched:
"And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born. 5. And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.
6. And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days. 7. And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,"
Jachin is where the road splits, as it does with Michael in those teaching the error.
Jachin is the pillar of the end times servant, NOT the “founding” as those who seek to deceive.
Jachin is the fallen cherub, who will be destroyed with the brightness of his coming.
Jachin is the one who is the beast who was, is not yet is. Jachin is he who’s soul is not upright in him but the just shall live by his faith.
Jachin is the sanctuary who will be trodden, and polluted, but also the sanctuary who will be cleansed because he will overcome. Remember Jesus told us that the son of man returns after the tribulation. Paul told us that the man of sin is revealed first, the son of perdition. The liars and those who worship the star of their god, Moloch will try to convince you of a millennial reign that has not happened yet. They will convince you that this “kingdom” will be on this earth before the resurrection and before any restoration of God’s Word within His Creation.
They stated that “Jachin” was the “Tiberian Hebrew” “Yakin” (So says the Masoretic “scholars”). The link shows in the side bar a snippet of the alleged “Aleppo Codex” – the problem with this “snippet” is that it is written in square script and therefore is not the Aleppo Codex but the rewritten one in the possession of Israel, the “state of”. It’s a lie for which the Christians of Syria are now suffering. Here is what “Ya’kin” is, in the Himalayas. You will recognize the reference and it’s symbol:
1. (Zool.) A large Asiatic antelope (Budorcas taxicolor) native of the higher parts of the Himalayas and other lofty mountains. Its head and neck resemble those of the ox, and its tail is like that of the goat. Called also budorcas." - Source, Freedictionary.com
This is what they look like
They were listed on some sites as “Takin” as well. On a side note, there is an American-Israeli screen writer who’s parents named him after the pillars – if “Yakin” is what the Freemason’s say it is.
Since Syriac was spoken on parts of Southern Turkey at one time, the “Hebrew” meaning for “Jachin” or the “other” word “Yakin” kind of connects to the Abarim Publications meaning for “Jachin” with “akin, connected, familiar, inseparable” and some of the others. I believe Jachin is Jachin and Yakin is a result of the “invented” Hebrew re-written in Babylon during the exile. The “J” sound in early Semitic languages was represented by the Yod/Yud. The Babylonian Jews changed it. That means Jachin has always been Jachin, Jesus has always been Jesus and Jehovah has always been Jehovah.
One more error on that particular “Gnostic Warrior” web site I would like to address:
Is Nathan the son of David in 2 Samuel 5:14 the same as the prophet sent to David in 2 Samuel 12? Nathan was the older brother of Solomon.
They surmise that the priest “Jachin” is the bloodline of Solomon because of another priest “Jedaiah” had a similar name to that which Prophet Nathan gave Solomon when he was born. This does not make them of Solomon. It’s at the very least disingenuous and seeks to undermine the divinity of Christ. Their error (or deception since they have the same access to the Bible as you and I) shows up below:
First there is NO “Bedaiah” in the Bible. There IS a Benaiah who is the son of Jehoiada and was among the men who sided with David against Adonijah. (Note Adonai is the name the Jews give “God” and also shows up in many of the newer English versions of the Bible – Adonijah revolted against David as Nathan told David God said would occur because he sinned and murdered Uriah).
I agree that the pillars could represent the “Old” and “New Testament” seed, but not through Solomon for both of them.
The “researcher” then seeks to completely cut out the lineage of Nathan in the bloodline of Jesus, by inserting the “fork in the road” through this priest, who was not even related in the direct bloodline to Solomon. Scripture testifies to both lineages of Jesus revealing the false doctrines of Freemasonry. The “fork in the road” is between Nathan, which bloodline Jesus’ mother Mary came, and Solomon which Jesus’ non-biological father came.
Jesus’ ONLY father was God in heaven. This is where the Freemason’s and those religions that adhere to their doctrine seek to deceive. Jesus was fathered from God, the Holy Ghost, NOT Joseph, of tainted seed.
Who is Jachin? What does the pillar named Jachin represent?