Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Children Of The Lord Of The Pit Part 1

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Thursday, November 20, 2014

Children Of The Lord Of The Pit Part 1

Jahbulon and Jachin
Is There A Relation?

"And Israel abode in Shittim, and the people began to commit whoredom with the daughters of Moab.   2. And they called the people unto the sacrifices of their gods: and the people did eat, and bowed down to their gods.

3. And Israel joined himself unto Baalpeor: and the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel.  4. And the Lord said unto Moses, Take all the heads of the people, and hang them up before the Lord against the sun, that the fierce anger of the Lord may be turned away from Israel.  5. And Moses said unto the judges of Israel, Slay ye every one his men that were joined unto Baalpeor."

We covered this in the last topic between Balaam and the children of Ammon and Moab.  There are a few things over the last couple of blogs that God showed me a bit more in depth, including the lineage of the children of Israel and why Balaam is so popular in the Bible as a “destroyer/deceiver of the people/ swallowed up the people”.  His name is mentioned more throughout the history of the books of the Bible than any other enemy of Israel save Satan himself.

Satan is mentioned 49 times in the KJV Bible, Lucifer once.  Balaam is mentioned 59 times.  Add "the devil" to the 50 times Satan and Lucifer are mentioned and we have a closer contest.

In Numbers 25 we learn that somehow, Balaam is connected to the corruption of Israel, and Israel “joins himself” to Baalpeor.

We learned from “"In The Company Of Six"”:

"And Israel abode in Shittim, and the people began to commit whoredom with the daughters of Moab.   2. And they called the people unto the sacrifices of their gods: and the people did eat, and bowed down to their gods.

3. And Israel joined himself unto Baalpeor: and the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel.   4. And the Lord said unto Moses, Take all the heads of the people, and hang them up before the Lord against the sun, that the fierce anger of the Lord may be turned away from Israel."

Israel joins “Baal-Peor” in Numbers 25.   Who is “Baal-Peor”?

"Baal-peor "lord of the opening," a god of Moab and Midian"

“Lord of the opening”?  What opening?  The Pit?  Would this be the “angel of the pit?  They have joined themselves unto the lord of the pit?  Note that “Baal-Peor” is almost identical to “Balaam the son of Beor” in Numbers 22.

Is “Baal” the same as “Balaam”?  Did the king of Moab elevate Balaam to the status of a “god”?  According to various sources listed on Wikipedia, “Ba’al” means “lord”, “husband” or “owner.   Balaam means “destroyer” or “deceiver” of the people.

Baal as a worshipped deity/person doesn’t appear in the Bible until Numbers 22:41.  Balaam is first introduced in Numbers 22:5.  Is there a relation? 

The very first reference to “Baal” is in the name “Baalhanan” in Genesis 36:38.  He is the son of Achbor, who reigns Edom in Saul’s stead.  The beginning of that chapter explains the descendents of Esau and they work their way down to Baalhanan.   A few names you see mentioned later in the Bible consist of Elphaz, Teman, Amalek, and Korah.  Interestingly they are called “Dukes”.   It says in verse 31 that there were kings in Edom before any king reigned in Israel.  Of those kings the first mentioned is Bela, the son of Beor (Balaam – Numbers 22 is the same).  In the order of reign are Bela, Jobab, Husham, Hadad, Samlah, Saul of Rehoboth, Baalhanan then Hadar of the city named Pau.   This is Genesis 36:39.   We will come across both Baal and Hadar’s city of Pau.

We know from previous blogs that Balaam was not a child of Israel/Jacob but of Abraham’s nephew, Lot’s descendents.  Lot’s children  became the children of Moab and Ammon.  Baal came up in Esau’s line which was of Abraham and Isaac, but of Esau, not Jacob.  Yet Balaam becomes the “stumbling block” put before Israel, getting them to succumb to temptation with whoredom and riches into joining themselves with “Lord of the opening” and worshiping the gods of the Moabites and the children of Ammon – Numbers 22-25”.  Names mean something.  Baal ben Beor and Balaam ben Beor?  Were there two who had the same name and who’s father was of the same name?  Or were these names to identify with who they were spiritually and what they did?

The Rebellion of Korah
Gainsaying of Core

In Numbers chapter 26 we run into some activity.

"And it came to pass after the plague, that the Lord spake unto Moses and unto Eleazar the son of Aaron the priest, saying,   2. Take the sum of all the congregation of the children of Israel, from twenty years old and upward, throughout their fathers' house, all that are able to go to war in Israel.

3. And Moses and Eleazar the priest spake with them in the plains of Moab by Jordan near Jericho, saying,   4. Take the sum of the people, from twenty years old and upward; as the Lord commanded Moses and the children of Israel, which went forth out of the land of Egypt.

5. Reuben, the eldest son of Israel: the children of Reuben; Hanoch, of whom cometh the family of the Hanochites: of Pallu, the family of the Palluites:"

And this was the family of Pallu:

"And the sons of Pallu; Eliab.

9 And the sons of Eliab; Nemuel, and Dathan, and Abiram. This is that Dathan and Abiram, which were famous in the congregation, who strove against Moses and against Aaron in the company of Korah, when they strove against the Lord:

10 And the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed them up together with Korah, when that company died, what time the fire devoured two hundred and fifty men: and they became a sign.

11 Notwithstanding the children of Korah died not."

This rebellion of Korah is mentioned in Jude 1:11, those who perished in the “gainsaying of Core”.  It makes note that the children of Korah did not die, only Korah and those that rebelled with him.  According to some there are two Korah’s in the Bible, Duke Korah the son of Adah from Eliphaz (the Temanite) who is son of Esau (Genesis 36:5 Genesis 36:16).  And Korah, grandson of Levi (Exodus 6:21).  Both Korah’s along with Esau’s and Levi’s grandson, Korah were associated with warring against Israel or rebelling.

Numbers 26 after verse 11 mention of the sons of Simeon of whom Jamin and Jachin are named as sons.  Korah was from the family of Levi, Jachin from the family of Simeon, and Dathan and Abarim who rebelled with Korah from the family of Pallu under Reuben.

"The sons of Simeon after their families: of Nemuel, the family of the Nemuelites: of Jamin, the family of the Jaminites: of Jachin, the family of the Jachinites:

13. Of Zerah, the family of the Zarhites: of Shaul, the family of the Shaulites.  14. These are the families of the Simeonites, twenty and two thousand and two hundred."

In Numbers 26, the last few verses which are 63 through 65, we learn that the first generation will die in the wilderness because they had disobeyed God, and had worshipped Idols or did not believe.  This included Jachin.  None was left that had been counted from Egypt except for Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun, who would lead them across a Jordan River on dry ground, and where stones would be laid for Israel where they lodged in Gilead before they took down the walls of Jericho.

We stopped at the family of Simeon, who's sons consisted of Jamin (meaning to the right) and "Jachin" whos name means either "stands against" or "stands in strength against".  There is no lineage from Jachin mentioned in the Bible which would testify that Jachin, if he had any children, did not make it to the Promised Land.  As a matter of fact, none of Simeon’s lineage beyond the seventh generation down is even mentioned by name.  The first generation out of Egypt were not go into the promised land and died out.  Only their children.

This could be because Christ was not of Simeon’s line and therefore his lineage was not focused upon – but their storyline does not continue through the Bible.  Yet Simeon is given a portion of the New Jerusalem in Ezekiel 48, as are the other tribes, minus Dan.

In Revelation 7:7, Simeon is one of the tribes (144,000) in which 12,000 are the elect which is 12,000 from each of the twelve tribes.  Those names of the 12 tribes comprise the gates of the city, and the foundation of which the headstone of the corner is Christ.

These are they that make up the city called New Jerusalem, and those that also of which the temple consist.  The temple is the “house for the Name of the Lord” – he who bares his name.  In Acts, there is also a prophet among Peter, Paul and Stephen of the apostles named Simeon who was also called “Niger”, and he taught the people as well:

"Simeon hath declared how God at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name."

Jachin, son of Simeon is mentioned first in Genesis 46:10.   Jachin is first mentioned in 1 Kings 7:21 as the name of the right pillar at the front of Solomon’s Temple, and it was also the name of a priest in 1 Chronicles 9:10 and as late as Nehemiah 11:10 where the name is last mentioned.

Jachin = to be established or “he/He (God) will establish)

Boaz = By strength/God establishes in strength.

I found this paragraph on Boaz interesting:

"The name Boaz literally means By Strength, and it appears to celebrate man's personal vigor. Personal strength may truly be a gift, but it, like anything else, should not be revered too much and certainly not held responsible for anything that was achieved by God. Whether Solomon named one of his pillars after his great-great-grandfather or that this is coincidence can not be determined, but note that via Zechariah, YHWH tells Zerubbabel, the restorer of the temple after the return from Babylon: "Not by might (בחיל) nor by power (בכח), but by My Spirit (ברוחי)" (Zechariah 4:6)." - Source, Abarim Publications

Jachin and Boaz cannot possibly have the same meanings.  There are two pillars for a reason.  They have different meanings, so I kept digging.  Key here also is Zechariah 4:6 – “Not by might nor by power, but by My Spirit” in reference to “the Word of the Lord to Zerubbabel”.   Zechariah if you remember was killed ‘between the temple and the altar’ in Matthew 23:35.

So who is Jachin?  The true character behind the right pillar of Solomon’s Temple is hardly mentioned in scripture.  We know Boaz and why the left pillar was so named for him.  There are two anointed.  Jachin gives us hardly any clues, but there is this:

The “sanctuary of strength” in Daniel 11:31 is polluted, the same sanctuary who with its “host” will be trodden in Daniel 8:11-13.  Question – what happened to the “pillars” on 9/11?

The Pillars

Destruction of the “Witnesses”

This is what they have planned

Isaiah 30:25

You are going to learn further verification of the meaning of the design of this new “One” World Trade Center, further down.

Remember – The end times servant who in Isaiah 52:14-15 we learn will shock the kings who will see things they were not told, and consider things they had not heard.  This is why the following chapter in Zechariah is so interesting – and incidentally why he was slain “in the temple”.

Jackson and Jachin – Really?

Remember from “In the Company Of Six” we learned that “Jackson” was also rooted in the name “Jackin” or “Jankin”.   I went back to the Bible over this.


The “surname” of Israel would be the same as “Jacob”.  Jacob has also been “profaned”, but you can always follow the breadcrumb trail to the source.

"is a common surname of English and Scottish origin. It literally means "son of Jack".

Son of Jack -

Jack -
Jack is thought to harken back to medieval times as a common derivative of the name John. The nickname has also been seen as Jackie among men (examples of note: Jackie Gleason; Jackie Coogan, Jackie Cooper, all of whom were formally named John). This "Jackie" diminutive of the nickname Jack is thought by some to have hailed from the earlier "Jackin" (born of the appellation Jankin).[3][4] Alternatively it may be derived from the name Jacques, which is the French form of the name Jacob.[3] There is also a theory that it is Celtic in origin, meaning "Healthy, Strong, Full of Vital Energy".

Not only isJacobrenamed Israelevolved intoJackit has also in common withJackinor Biblically spelledJachinas in Jachin and Boaz”.  Now you know who comprises the other half of the pillars of Solomon’s Temple, and also that of thestrongtowerand thesanctuary of strengthand MosesNatural Forceso coveted by Satan in Jude 1:9.


Jachin and Boaz are the pillars of the porch of Solomon’s temple.  Boaz was the kinsman of Naomi’s husband but Ruth herself was a Moabite, who had married one of Naomi’s sons (who also died).  Boaz married Ruth so that the inheritance that would have been to Naomi’s deceased husband, Elimelech would not be lost.  From Ruth came Obed, the father of Jesse which was the father of David – and so began the line from which Jesus would be made “the Word Made Flesh”, from his mother Mary.

Each of the sons brought to glory, (so that the captain of our salvation is made perfect through sufferings) contributed to a stone or a pillar in the temple that became the one who would rise up from the dead.

Solomon named the pillars of which the secret would be kept – The secrets of “Freemasonry” lie within “Jachin and Boaz”.  Here is one “version” of what the pillars mean:

Jachin and Boaz - the Freemason Story

They say Jachin means:

"In all the languages of the Semitic stock the letters J and Y are interchangeable, as we see in the modern Arabic "Yakub" for "Jacob" and the old Hebrew "Yaveh" for "Jehovah." This gives us the form "Yachin," which at once reveals the enigma. The word Yak signifies "one"; and the termination "hi," or "hin," is an intensitive which may be rendered in English by "only." Thus the word "Jachin" resolves itself into the words "one only," the all-embracing Unity." - Source, Sacred Texts

Humorous now is the whole “unity” sales pitch by the “New Age” gurus, you get desensitized to this after a while.  Understand that they are speaking from a “Freemason” mindset as if it is a good thing and the god of Freemasonry hasn’t already been exposed.

God has created some very surprising clues to some long guarded secrets, which He wanted us to know but were hidden from us because of our distance from Him; and not all things, but those which He put in the book to be remembered when He opened our eyes.

Those that sought to abuse this knowledge and shut up that portion of the Kingdom, greedily guarding it and distributing it for gain now pretend to give you what they took from you in the first place; the offspring of they who left their first habitation to teach men they could become gods as they ushered them into bondage and death.

On that same web site, they define Boaz:

Boaz means:

"The meaning of Boaz is clearly seen in the book of Ruth. There Boaz appears as the kinsman exercising the right of pre-emption so familiar to those versed in Oriental law--a right which has for its purpose the maintenance of the Family as the social unit. According to this widely-spread custom, the purchaser, who is not a member of the family, buys the property subject to the right of kinsmen within certain degrees to purchase it back, and so bring it once more into the family to which it originally belonged. " - Source, Sacred Texts

He speaks of Oriental law in relation to the “family as the social unit”.  In the example in the story of Boaz and Ruth.  Boaz is in reverence to Ruth’s dedication to Naomi and more so when Ruth asks Boaz to marry her so that the line of Naomi’s husband “Elimelech” does not lose its inheritance.  Boaz tells her that if none of her closer kinsmen would marry her, then he would.  The only kinsmen qualified who was closer in relation to Naomi’s deceased husband declined because Ruth was a Moabite, so Boaz married her to continue the line to the Christ.

Remember the “One World Trade Center” –

This is what they have planned

What does this represent besides the “mingling”?

"And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay."

Unity – the message “We’re all ONE”.

"The former is Unity of Being; the latter, Unity of Intention: and the principle of this Dual-Unity is well illustrated by the story of Boaz. The whole story proceeds on the idea of the Family as the social unit, the root-conception of all Oriental law, and if we consider the Family in this light, we shall see how exactly it embodies the two-fold idea of Jachin and Boaz, unity of Being and unity of Thought. The Family forms a unit because all the members proceed from a common progenitor, and are thus all of one blood; but, although this gives them a natural unity of Being of which they cannot divest themselves, it is not enough in itself to make them a united family, as unfortunately experience too often shows. Something more is wanted, and that something is Love. There must be a personal union brought about by sympathetic Thought to complete the natural union resulting from birth. The inherent unity must be expressed by the Individual volition of each member, and thus the Family becomes the ideally perfect social unit; a truth to which St. Paul alludes when he calls God the Father from Whom every family in heaven and on earth is named. " - Source, Sacred Texts

Christ already did this.  This is why God commanded to love Him, and Jesus revealed to Love God first, putting nothing before Him.  They are teaching reverence of a family unit, which if you have been keeping up with our notes on Mormon Doctrine, is the basis of their “sealing ceremony” in which you are “sealed to your family” for “eternity.

There is no Biblical basis for a “sealing” ceremony, nor is there “baptism of the dead”.  The Bible teaches that through CHRIST are we one, not through mental bondage to another entity.  We are warned in Revelation –

"And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.

13. These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.   14. These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful."

You can become “One” through Christ, to God, or you can become “One” by giving your soul to other gods for gain.  Some have sadly already chosen.

From Abarim Publications

"According to Spiros Zodhiates' The Complete Word Study Dictionary New Testament, the name Jachin gave rise to the name Achim of Matthew 1:14." - Source,

Let’s look at this in context, Matthew 1:12-15.

"And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel;   13. And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor;

14. And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud;   15. And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob;  16. And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ."

This is the only place Achim is mentioned in the Bible.  There is no evidence that Achim is of Jachin or that he was named for Jachin, but his mention is just as brief. 

It is important to note that Joseph, husband of Mary, was not Jesus’ biological father.  The lineage is recited from Jesus, back in Luke 3:22-38 all the way back to Adam.  Reading through this you see Zorobabel which is the same as Zerubbabel.  In Luke 3, we see in parenthesis Jesus (as was supposed) the son of Joseph.  So by this we know they are reciting Mary’s line and not Joseph’s.  Achim shows up in Joseph’s lineage in Matthew 1.  He does not show up in Luke 3 for Mary’s line.

The lineage for Mary’s line and Joseph’s line is the same until you get to David’s sons King Solomon and Nathan/ Matthew 1:6 and Luke 3:31 respectively.  So from Solomon on, Joseph’s line was not connected to Christ until possibly the enigma between Zerubbabel and his father.  We discussed Zerubbabel here in several parts.

Achim was the name of Eddie Murphy's character in "Coming to America" (to find his bride).  It was spelled “Akeem” in the movie.  Perhaps another hint such as the missing "J" sound from words uttered by Sardom Numpsa in "The Golden Child", another Murphy film (covered toward the bottom of “Guess Where YahWeh Came From”.

"The name Jachin comes from the verb כון (kun), meaning to be established:

The name Jachin is derived from a future form of כון (kun). For a meaning of the name Jachin, Jones' Dictionary of Old Testament Proper Names proposes He Will Give Certainty or He Will Establish. NOBSE Study Bible Name List reads He (God) Establishes." - Source,

Abarim Publications gives almost the same meaning for Jachin as they do Boaz.  Biblically there isn’t much to go on in the manner of meaning for Jachin.  Is Jachin the same as “Achim”? 

"Achim –
2) Or the name Achim may come from the Hebrew verb קום (qum) meaning to rise up or stand:

The root-verb קום (qum) generally means to rise up or stand. It's used in all the expected ways,

This verb is used when items are set up (idols - Leviticus 26:1), or when one assumes an office or position: that of leader (Genesis 37:7), prophet (Deuteronomy 34:10), judge (Judges 10:1). Thus this verb also used when a covenant is established (Exodus 6:4).  t's unclear from which verb Achim comes, but should we consider it to come from כון, Achim would mean something like Established. Should we reckon Achim to come from קום, it would mean Raised Up." - source, AbarimPublications

Several of these examples describe the end times servant:  “to rise up or stand” – Ecclesiastes 4:14-15 and Daniel 12:1; “one assumes office or position” again Ecclesiastes 4, Revelation 2:27-28, Revelation 12:5, 1 Thessalonians 4:16; and “when a covenant is established” in Daniel 9:27, Daniel 11:22, Malachi 3:1, Hebrews 8:9 and many more examples which ascribe to both Christ and he who will counterfeit him.

The storyline for Freemason apologists which promote the Occultic versions, the religion of the Jews and Mormon, Jehovah’s Witnesses and other premillennial doctrine begins to rear its head such as the explanation from “Gnostic Warrior”:

"The two pillars of Boaz and Jachin were two copper, brass or bronze pillars which stood in the porch of Solomon’s Temple, the first Temple in Jerusalem.  Boaz stood on the left and Jachin (‘founding’, Tiberian Hebrew יָכִיןîn) stood on the right which we can see id detailed in 2 Chronicles 3:17 – “He (HiRam Abiff) erected the pillars in the front of the temple, one to the south and one to the north. The one to the south he named Jakin and the one to the north Boaz.” In Revelation 3:12 we will find the promises that were made to Boaz and Jachin.” – Source, Gnostic Warrior

They translate “Yakin” as “founding”.  They also credit their Freemason “Hiram Abiff” (The Mason’s Hiram) with the Hiram craftsman in Tyre (1 Kings 7:13-14) who was called “King Hiram of Tyre” (1 Kings 5:1) whom Solomon contacted to build the temple.  There is also the “King of Tyrus” who is associated with Satan/Lucifer in Ezekiel 28.

He mentions the “promises made to Jachin and Boaz” in Revelation 3:12.  Let’s look at the scripture:

"Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name."

The writer is right in that this scripture references that “pillar”.  Also mentioned is that “he will go no more out”.    Remember this is Christ himself giving the revelation to John.  It is Christ who also tells John to write to the church in Pergamos, this revelation about the same one who ‘overcomes’:

"And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:

27. And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father.   28. And I will give him the morning star."

In Revelation 12 we are told who this is, as well as other scripture we have researched:

"And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.   5. And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.

6. And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days.   7. And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,"

Jachin is where the road splits, as it does with Michael in those teaching the error.

Jachin is the pillar of the end times servant, NOT the “founding” as those who seek to deceive. 

Jachin is the fallen cherub, who will be destroyed with the brightness of his coming.

Jachin is the one who is the beast who was, is not yet is.  Jachin is he who’s soul is not upright in him but the just shall live by his faith.

Jachin is the sanctuary who will be trodden, and polluted, but also the sanctuary who will be cleansed because he will overcome.  Remember Jesus told us that the son of man returns after the tribulation.  Paul told us that the man of sin is revealed first, the son of perdition.  The liars and those who worship the star of their god, Moloch will try to convince you of a millennial reign that has not happened yet.  They will convince you that this “kingdom” will be on this earth before the resurrection and before any restoration of God’s Word within His Creation.

They stated that “Jachin” was the “Tiberian Hebrew” “Yakin” (So says the Masoretic “scholars”).  The link shows in the side bar a snippet of the alleged “Aleppo Codex” – the problem with this “snippet” is that it is written in square script and therefore is not the Aleppo Codex but the rewritten one in the possession of Israel, the “state of”.  It’s a lie for which the Christians of Syria are now suffering.  Here is what “Ya’kin” is, in the Himalayas.  You will recognize the reference and it’s symbol:

Ya´kin n.  
1.   (Zool.) A large Asiatic antelope (Budorcas taxicolor) native of the higher parts of the Himalayas and other lofty mountains. Its head and neck resemble those of the ox, and its tail is like that of the goat. Called also budorcas." - Source,

This is what they look like

They were listed on some sites as “Takin” as well.  On a side note, there is an American-Israeli screen writer who’s parents named him after the pillars – if “Yakin” is what the Freemason’s say it is.

"Boaz Yakin (born 1966) American screenwriter and film director (director “Remember the Titans”) - Source, Translation

English words used for the Turkish word Yakin -
"adjacent, akin, akin to, approximate, at hand, by, close, close-range, close to, connate, connected, connection, connexion, contiguous, convenient, familiar, handy, hard, hard by, immediate, imminent, inseparable, intimate," and others similar in meaning"

Since Syriac was spoken on parts of Southern Turkey at one time, the “Hebrew” meaning for “Jachin” or the “other” word “Yakin” kind of connects to the Abarim Publications meaning for “Jachin” with “akin, connected, familiar, inseparable” and some of the others.  I believe Jachin is Jachin and Yakin is a result of the “invented” Hebrew re-written in Babylon during the exile.  The “J” sound in early Semitic languages was represented by the Yod/Yud.  The Babylonian Jews changed it.  That means Jachin has always been Jachin, Jesus has always been Jesus and Jehovah has always been Jehovah.

One more error on that particular “Gnostic Warrior” web site I would like to address:

Who was the bloodline and tribe of Jachin?
In Nehemiah 11:10 we find our answer; “From the priests: Jedaiah; the son of Joiarib; Jakin; In 1 Chron. ix. 10 we find ‘Jedaiah, and Jehoiarib, Jachin.’ As these three are the names of well-known priestly houses (cf. 1 Chron. xxiv. 7, Jehoiarib the first, Jedaiah the second, Jachin the one and twentieth in the twenty-four). Then when you look in the bible, you will find that the name Jedidiah is mentioned only once in the Bible, and that it is the name which the prophet Nathan gave to Solomon (2 Samuel 12:25). So, the pillar of Jachin would also represent the blood line of King Solomon, but an apparent different one than that of Boaz and the Tribe of Judah. Meaning King Solomon had two children that would apparently be split into two different tribes that are now represented in Freemasonry as the Pillars of Boaz and Jachin.” – Source, Gnostic Warrior

Is Nathan the son of David in 2 Samuel 5:14 the same as the prophet sent to David in 2 Samuel 12?  Nathan was the older brother of Solomon.

They surmise that the priest “Jachin” is the bloodline of Solomon because of another priest “Jedaiah” had a similar name to that which Prophet Nathan gave Solomon when he was born.  This does not make them of Solomon.  It’s at the very least disingenuous and seeks to undermine the divinity of Christ.  Their error (or deception since they have the same access to the Bible as you and I) shows up below:

It was King David’s most important son, Solomon as I mentioned above was named Jedidiah that is also pronounced as Bedaiah,  which means a “servant of Yah or Jehovah.” He was the Israelite exile who had took a foreign woman. A son of Bani who had married a “strange wife” (Ezra 10:35).

Based on my research above, it is clear to me that Boaz represent the bloodline of King David through Solomon to Jesus Christ that Jesus would represent the complete succession of blood and royalty from King David down through King Solomon to Jesus. The blood line of Jachin would represent the split o the Davidic blood line in which Davids son, King Solomon had intermarried with a “new bloodline” that we clearly see in Ezra 10:35 where Solomon is referred to the a son of Bani who had married a “strange wife”  and this is now represented in Jachin. Boaz being the Old Testament blood lines and Jachin being the New Testament blood lines.” – Source,

First there is NO “Bedaiah” in the Bible.  There IS a Benaiah who is the son of Jehoiada and was among the men who sided with David against Adonijah. (Note Adonai is the name the Jews give “God” and also shows up in many of the newer English versions of the Bible – Adonijah revolted against David as Nathan told David God said would occur because he sinned and murdered Uriah).

I agree that the pillars could represent the “Old” and “New Testament”  seed, but not through Solomon for both of them.

The “researcher” then seeks to completely cut out the lineage of Nathan in the bloodline of Jesus, by inserting the “fork in the road” through this priest, who was not even related in the direct bloodline to Solomon.  Scripture testifies to both lineages of Jesus revealing the false doctrines of Freemasonry.  The “fork in the road” is between Nathan, which bloodline Jesus’ mother Mary came, and Solomon which Jesus’ non-biological father came.

Jesus’ ONLY father was God in heaven.  This is where the Freemason’s and those religions that adhere to their doctrine seek to deceive.  Jesus was fathered from God, the Holy Ghost, NOT Joseph, of tainted seed.

Who is Jachin?  What does the pillar named Jachin represent?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.