Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: The Mark Of Words

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

The Mark Of Words

Footprints in the Sand Part 1

There is a conspiracy of her prophets in the midst thereof, like a roaring lion ravening the prey; they have devoured souls; they have taken the treasure and precious things; they have made her many widows in the midst thereof.

"Then said he unto me, Son of man, hast thou seen what the ancients of the house of Israel do in the dark, every man in the chambers of his imagery? for they say, the Lord seeth us not; the Lord hath forsaken the earth."

"And Joshua at that time turned back, and took Hazor, and smote the king thereof with the sword: for Hazor beforetime was the head of all those kingdoms."

On “The Price Of Love” we discovered “The Word”; the Word which was in the beginning and was God and was life and the light of men.  The Word was made flesh, which is the seed, which is the name, which is Christ who fulfills the law, on which hangs all the law and the prophets, and which is this;

For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself."

There is another word, which Jesus says in prayer to God in the garden of Gethsemane, for his disciples, and for those God gives to Christ:

"I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil.   16. They are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.   17. Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."

Thy Word is truth; and the law is fulfilled in one word, that you shall love your neighbor as yourself.  Christ fulfills the law and “his name is called the Word of God”.

Since the original “Word” and the meanings of words have evolved and changed (have been corrupted) over time, it should not be too much of a stretch of the mind to understand that “The Word” would be the main target of those who conspire against truth.

There was a work of prose credited to Michael Jackson published in the book “Dancing the Dream” which many who are not “fans” may have been cut off from this other side of the “moonwalker”.  It was titled “Mark of the Ancients”.

Mark Of the Ancients

"He had lived in the desert all his life, but for me it was all new. "See that footprint in the sand?" he asked, pointing to a spot by the cliff. I looked as close as I could. "No, I don't see anything."

"That's just the point." He laughed. "Where you can't see a print, that's where the Ancient Ones walked."

We went on a little farther, and he pointed to an opening, high up on the sandstone wall. "See that house up there?" he asked. I squinted hard. "There's nothing to see."

"You're a good student." He smiled. "Where there's no roof or chimney, that's where the Ancient Ones are most likely to have lived."

We rounded a bend, and before us was spread a fabulous sight — thousands upon thousands of desert flowers in bloom. "Can you see any missing?" he asked me. I shook my head. "It's just wave after wave of loveliness."

"Yes," he said in a low voice. "Where nothing is missing, that's where the Ancient Ones harvested the most."

I thought about all this, about how generations had once lived in harmony with the earth, leaving no marks to scar the places they inhabited. At camp that night I said, "You left out one thing."

"What's that?" he asked.

"Where are the Ancient Ones buried?"

Without reply, he poked his stick into the fire. A bright flame shot up, licked the air, and disappeared. My teacher gave me a glance to ask if I understood this lesson. I sat very still, and my silence told him I did.”

Michael Jackson, DANCING THE DREAM, 1992

I thought about this poem after completing the Biblical study on “The Word”, so I searched for it and read it again and I disagree with it.  I disagree with it for a number of reasons.  I could philosophize it in a number of different ways, but if we come to it from a perspective of truth, one would have to argue that the Ancients, if they were so harmoniously in sync with creation, would still be here.

It is also evident that they have left their marks, although unless you know where to look, you cannot see them.

The ancient’s left their mark on the word, written in us.  They have profaned God’s name and they have done violence to the law as it has been written.

The words they have added to the book are the footprints in the sand of the nations.  They have become fossils embedded in the stones of our substance.  And because they have much of the world occupied with the drama they have choreographed in human history and current events the truth buried and untold continues to stagnate under polluted waters.  However, if you follow the air bubbles that spoil the surface, you begin to trace them to the source, turn over the pebbles and expose the impressions left behind. 

The roots from which the present words came are revealed, and the garment of the conspiracy can be seen under the eroding mire.


This message comes on the heels of yet another dream.  I was standing with a group of people in the outdoors amidst the disarray and ruin of some catastrophe.  I could not tell you what had happened; only that what was left of people’s homes were not structurally safe to live in.  It was cold, and people were keeping warm standing around various fires fueled by some of the ruins placed in pits and barrels.

There were busses coming in to evacuate people.  Men in uniform were assisting in organizing by groups, so the busses were not rushed.  As a bus pulled up to the group of people with me, we all quietly began boarding the bus with soft conversation being passed between people.

I sat down right behind the driver in a seat that faced the isle.  All the other seats faced front except the very first seats behind the cab of the bus.  The bus was warmer and when the door closed, the cold wind was cut off.

As the bus began to move, conversation began to slowly pick up.  The two what I thought were military men that had organized the boarding of this bus were relaxed, leaning against the poles.  They had weapons but they were holstered.  Questions began coming to them and they were responding.

I put my head back against the window desperately wanting to close my eyes, but words were resting against my ears out of the low droning of voices in conversation.  One word in particular occurred more than once and it made my eyes fly open.  Then another word which became it’s partner.  Those two words were “federal” and “prison”.

I brought my head forward and leaned in to hear.  People were telling another behind them or in front of them, or across the isle that this bus was taking us to federal prison.

In my mind, I was shaking my head vigorously from side to side; no!  I leaned toward the driver of the bus and asked him “Is this bus taking everyone to federal prison?”

He bobbed his head back toward mine without taking his eyes off the road and replied, “When all this happened, there were a lot of people who had broken out or broke their parole, so we’re picking them up.”

My heart went into my throat.  This guy really believed this!  I responded, “No, no, that’s not true!  What did they tell you?”

He answered “We’re just picking up the criminals”.

As calmly as I could, I told him “but there are no criminals here!  Why are they telling you this?”  He answered “You didn’t run or break parole?”

I said to him, beginning to cry, “You don’t understand . . . I’ve never been in prison!  Never been on parole!”  My hands came up to my face and covered my eyes as tears of panic sprung, “Oh dear God, please!  How do I get out of this?”

Immediately my prayer was answered and I woke up.  The last thing I remember  that woke me up was the feeling of my hands covering my crying eyes and my cheeks against the palm of my hand.

There was nothing spiritually symbolic about this, it was just a dream about an event, other than God took me out of the dream when I prayed asking to get out.

There have been some disturbing, mainstream news headlines making its path ready for global government since the latest “terrorist” event in Paris.  ISIS has not been a big enough sell for them, so now we’re back to Al Qaida. 

Headlines such as Fox News actor Bill O’Reilly’s “Talking Points” on whether countries should get together “globally” to “fight terrorism” and whether a global entity should not be set up to combat this “scourge” effectively.  It’s been thirteen years since 9/11.  We’ve had three wars (one still ongoing) involving just about all of the “allied forces” since then.  Where has Bill been?  Stuck in the “spin” cycle?

Another “news” lady from a conservative radio show is suggesting “Unity” among the media outlets against “terrorism”.  Unity.

The atrocities occurring in Syria and Iraq, and those that had occurred in Egypt, Libya, Afghanistan and Pakistan, Palestine, the Sudan, South Africa and other locales have reached more ears than they are comfortable with but still; it can be explained away on their “bad-cop” script. (See “Good Cop-Bad Cop” April 2013).

If you think truth has taken a beating in HIStory, you have seen nothing yet.  We covered “Love”.  Now we’re going to take a deeper look at “Truth” – the other “Word” of God.

Love of The Truth

Jesus  in Luke 17 prayed for the disciples and those of the future who would call upon his name in Gethsemane, the night he was taken by the soldiers.  He asked God to “sanctify them through thy truth.  Thy Word is truth”.

Jesus was also the one who said to Peter in Luke 8:11 explaining the parable, “The seed is the Word of God”.

Paul, who was the chosen vessel to bear Christ’s name said in Galatians 5:14 “the law is fulfilled in one word – thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself”.

David said of God’s word:

"For the word of the Lord is right; and all his works are done in truth."

"My zeal hath consumed me, because mine enemies have forgotten thy words.   140. Thy word is very pure: therefore thy servant loveth it."

God’s Word, love and truth together in 1 John:

"My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth."

In 1 Kings 17, the story of Elijah and the widow who’s son died and was brought back to life by God, through the prayer of Elijah ends with the woman saying to him:

"And the woman said to Elijah, Now by this I know that thou art a man of God, and that the word of the Lord in thy mouth is truth."

Here she says the ‘word of the Lord in thy mouth is truth”.  There are other scriptures pertaining to “putting the words in his mouth” in several other scriptures:

"And thou shalt speak unto him, and put words in his mouth:"

I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth;"

And come to the king, and speak on this manner unto him. So Joab put the words in her mouth."

" . . . for thy servant Joab, he bade me, and he put all these words in the mouth of thine handmaid:"

Another expression of the same act was to eat words:

"Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart: for I am called by thy name, O Lord God of hosts."

And in Revelation 10:9-10 The Lord tells John to take the book from the great angel in which the words were written, and to eat it, for he was not to speak the words which were for a later time.

Of course most believe this is figuratively speaking and since we are talking about a spiritual book, that could be the case.  But if you recall from the September 2014 article “American Zion – American Messiah”, the “Golem” were created by men, the “Maharal” to be exact, who did so by forming “clay” and placing words or letters of God’s name in the mouth or the forehead:

"The Maharal is the subject of the legend about the creation of a golem, a creature made out of clay to defend the Jews of the Prague Ghetto from antisemitic attacks, particularly the blood libel. He is said to have used mystical powers based on the esoteric knowledge of how God created Adam.[8] The general view of historians and critics is that the legend is a German literary invention of the early 19th century." - Source, Wikipedia

And from “To Restore A Pure Language” also in September we reported:

The story or legend with the golem is that Adam was originally created as a “golem”:

"The oldest stories of golems date to early Judaism. In the Talmud (Tractate Sanhedrin 38b), Adam was initially created as a golem (גולם) when his dust was "kneaded into a shapeless husk." Like Adam, all golems are created from mud. They were a creation of those who were very holy and close to God. A very holy person was one who strove to approach God, and in that pursuit would gain some of God's wisdom and power." - Source, Wikpedia

And further down, it explains the manipulation of the Hebrew Alphabet:

According to “legend” the “golem” were made out of clay, then activated or deactivated by inserting something in their forehead or in their mouth. 

"During the Middle Ages, passages from the Sefer Yetzirah (Book of Creation) were studied as a means to attain the mystical ability to create and animate a golem, although there is little in the writings of Jewish mysticism that supports this belief. It was believed that golems could be activated by an ecstatic experience induced by the ritualistic use of various letters of the Hebrew Alphabet[1] forming a "shem" (any one of the Names of God).The shem was written on a piece of paper and inserted either in the mouth or in the forehead of the golem, thus bringing it into life and action." - Source, Idel, Moshe (1990). Golem: Jewish Magical and Mystical Traditions on the Artificial Anthropoid. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press. ISBN 0-7914-0160-X. page 296

Interestingly it says the golems could be “activated” by an “ecstatic experience” induced by “ritualistic use” of the various letters of the Hebrew Alphabet.

We repeated part of this:

From the “Moshe” article abstract above:

It was believed that golems could be activated by an ecstatic experience induced by the ritualistic use of various letters of the Hebrew Alphabet[1] forming a "shem" (any one of the Names of God).The shem was written on a piece of paper and inserted either in the mouth or in the forehead of the golem, thus bringing it into life and action."

The shem.  It says “any one of the names of God” but that is not where the power is.  Obviously if it was “any” of the names of God, people would be popping out golems left and right every time they went to church and recited scripture – if it were true.

If this isn’t true, then why is the name of God kept hidden?  Why did Moses, Elijah, Jesus and Paul accuse the Jews of profaning the name of God?

And this we also posted recently discussing Samuel and Saul’s anointing:

Looking at “Bethlehem” again I noticed something.  If the “e” and the “l” were transposed for some reason, Bethlehem would read “Bethelhem” or “Bethel” with “hem” added to it.  Since “Bethel” means “house of God”, perhaps the “hem” suffix in Bethlehem refers to a “fringe” or “border for “border” of the house of God or “foundation” of the house of God.

I also found this.  Part of the word “Bethlehem”, “hem” is part of the name of “Shem”.  Shem was Noah’s first son from which the Semitic people came (Jews, Arabs, Abraham was descendant of Shem as was Jacob, Isaac and Ishmael).  Jesus was a descendant of Shem also.

Shem did not show up in that same Etymology link,but Samuel did. And they used “Shem” to describe the meaning of that name!

masc. proper name, Biblical judge and prophet, from Late Latin, from Greek Samouel, from Hebrew Shemiel, literally "the name of God," from shem "name" + El "God."

Bethlehem = Beth (house) + el (God) + shem (name).  “The House of God’s Name” Or the “name of the house of God”?  The “new” city from Ephrath to Bethlehem which is also Zion which is also Jerusalem – all but the latter named as the city of David.

If “Shemiel” derivative of “Samuel” means “the name of God”, then “Shem” means “the name”.

2 Chronicles 6 discusses the building of the ‘house’ for the “Name of the Lord”.

Further down we learned that this involves use of the “emet” (they say means truth);

"In some tales, (for example, some versions of those of the golems of Chełm and Prague, as well as in Polish tales and version of Brothers Grimm), a golem is inscribed with Hebrew words, such as the word emet (אמת, "truth" in Hebrew) written on its forehead." - Source, Zucker, Robert (2007–2011). "17th Century". "Sefer Yetzirah" Time Line. Retrieved Feb/11/13. citing an anonymous 1630 manuscript concerning the Golem of Chelm. See also Introduction to "The Golem Returns" citing Johannes Reuchlin (1492).

- and to deactivate a golem is taking the “Aleph” out of the “emet”, changing the “truth” to “death”.

The golem could then be deactivated by removing the aleph (א) in emet,[5] thus changing the inscription from "truth" to "death" (met מת, meaning "dead"). - Source, Zucker, Robert (2007–2011). "17th Century". "Sefer Yetzirah" Time Line. Retrieved Feb/11/13. 

That same source asserted that the “law of creation” reversal is the “law of destruction”.

Rabbi Jacob ben Shalom, who arrived at Barcelona from Germany in 1325, remarked, the law of destruction is the reversal of the law of creation.[7]" - Source, Zucker, Robert (2007–2011). "17th Century". "Sefer Yetzirah" Time Line. Retrieved Feb/11/13. citing an anonymous 1630 manuscript concerning the Golem of Chelm.

If “death” is the opposite of “truth” then “truth” is life.  According to John 1:4, God is life, and His life is the light of men, Christ being the “Word made flesh” full of grace and truth.

From Sandhedrin 65b -

"Rava said: the righteous could build worlds if they wanted but “it is your iniquities that separate you…” (Isaiah 59:2) Rava created a man. (Rashi: he studied Sefer Yetzirah and learned how to put the letters of G-d’s name together)" - Source,

"Behold, the Lord's hand is not shortened, that it cannot save; neither his ear heavy, that it cannot hear:   2. But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid his face from you, that he will not hear.

3. For your hands are defiled with blood, and your fingers with iniquity; your lips have spoken lies, your tongue hath muttered perverseness.   4. None calleth for justice, nor any pleadeth for truth: they trust in vanity, and speak lies; they conceive mischief, and bring forth iniquity."

Remember, “iniquity” means “injustice/uneven”.  They learned how to manipulate the letters of God’s name.  Let’s review what we learned about the profaning of his name (and corruption of the language).

The Aleph (Alaph in Syriac – see “Syria’s Secret”).

Aleph -
"ʾĀlp is the first letter of many Semitic abjads (alphabets), including Phoenician Aleph Phoenician aleph.svg, Syriac 'Ālap ܐ, Hebrew Aleph א, and Arabic Alif ا.

The Phoenician letter gave rise to the Greek Alpha (Α), being re-interpreted to express not the glottal consonant but the accompanying vowel, and hence the Latin A and Cyrillic А.

In phonetics, aleph /ˈɑːlɛf/ originally represented the glottal stop ([ʔ]), often transliterated as U+02BEʾmodifier letter right half ring (HTML: ʾ), based on the Greek spiritus lenis ʼ, for example, in the transliteration of the letter name itself, ʾāleph."

The transliteration of the letter name itself based on the Greek “spiritus lenis”.  What is the Greek "spiritus lenis"? 

The smooth breathing (Ancient Greek: ψιλν πνεμα psilòn pneûma; Modern Greek: ψιλή psilí ; Latin: spīritus lēnis) is a diacritical mark used in polytonic orthography. In ancient Greek, it marks the absence of the voiceless glottal fricative /h/ from the beginning of a word."

Which of course lead to the “breathing life” into the nostrils of Adam, and the “Spirit” moving over the face of the waters “in the beginning”, before the earth had any form and was still void and before any “Word” was issued at that beginning.

The Aleph (Alaph in Syriac, remember for which Aleppo was named, and which the “Aleppo Codex” also was named, who’s missing pages are subject of a global search by the government of Israel) was changed from its original written form as were the other original Semitic letters of the Alphabet.  Before physical writing, they were only spoken words whose sounds left imprints on our DNA.

What we are told is the “progression” of the early Alaph was this:

We review this in “Syria’s Secret Part 2” and compare the early Syriac alphabet.

The “Syriac” language is Biblically mentioned being spoken at least during the time of exile in Babylon, in 500-400 BC (2 Kings 18:26, Isaiah 36:11).

Note that the “Alaph” looks like a “Y”, not a “cross”-like “N” shape.  And note that the “Yod” which the Jews today say is the letter in God’s name sounding like “Y” in Syriac actually represents the J sound as in “Jesus” or “Jeshuah” not “Yeshua”.  Therefore the “Aleph” or the “Alaph”, which is now represented as a “crossed” N-shape; which Jewish scholars say previously was the “ox” shape was actually the sideways “y”.

Noah Spoke a Pure Language

We also through the Biblical timeline located the “new beginning” after the flood of Noah at Mount Ararat which is near the border of Turkey and Syria, where the “new language” would have “replenished the earth” through “Noah, who was perfect in his generations”.  And Abraham was the first called a “Hebrew”, therefore the language named “Hebrew” did not exist in the time of Noah.  What the language was called is probably insignificant to the fact that after the dispersion at “Babel”, Noah was one of the few that even knew the pure language.

At 2:50-2:55, Michael Jackson’s “This Is It” director says “The ‘Y’ at the center of everything we do is really all about this”.

The “Y” is significant but phonetically it’s relation to the original representation of the sound was changed to hide something.  The truth.

Amen, I Say Again, Amen

A while back we did a word research on the word “Amen”.  On “Angels of Light and White Buffalos” we learned that the Biblical conclusion to many a paragraph “Amen” means “Truth” had been hijacked by Egyptian mysticism-based religions such as the LDS church and Pagan Gnosticism.  Egyptian mysticism associated their god “Amon” with the word “Amen” in the Bible.  Joseph Smith took this and ran with it as did other sun god religions before them.

If "Amen" is actually the "emet" meaning "truth"; and "removing the Aleph" turns word into "death" (to deactivate a "golem" made of "clay"); then removing the "Alaph/Aleph" from the "Amen" would turn "Amen" into "Men" . . . meaning "death"  

Amen = Emet
Met   = Men

Amen - Emet = "Truth"
Met - Men = "death"

Recently I came upon an article by a “new” self-proclaimed “prophet” on a Facebook page which was being promoted on Twitter.  In part, their claims are familiar.  His name is Cullen Smith:


Compare Joseph Smith Papyri

Some text further down on Cullen’s Notes:

"Again just as Horus and Jesus, the story of the SUN of God, as it travels through the Zodiac, who is said to be "crucified" and rises again on the 3rd day, which is actually Dec 25 of the winter solstice when the Sun is Born on the Ecliptic. His day is known as the Holy Day: Sunday, SUNS DAY! The 12 disciples are the 12 signs of the ZODIAC!" - Source, Facebook Notes

The first mistake this man makes is associating the Roman Catholic Church with the murder of Christ.  The Bible tells us who conspired to put Christ to death.  It wasn’t Rome.  Peter in Acts 3:13 says that Pilate wanted to let Jesus go and throughout the trials of the Gospels of Matthew through John, Pilate wanted nothing to do with killing Jesus.  Pilate admonished the Jews and knew their envy of Jesus (Matthew 27:18).

The second mistake he makes is associating the Roman Catholic government of the church with Christianity.  They are no more Christian than Mormonism or Islam.  But the biggest mistake of all is labeling Christ Jesus as a religion.  Jesus was not “Christian”.  He was not Baptist or Mormon or Egyptian or Hindu nor did he practice Judaism.  Jesus was persecuted because he would not endorse the traditions of men. 

Jesus also was not born on the 25th of December.   There is nothing in the Bible associating Jesus’ birthday with that of the winter feast of the Jews . . . NOTHING.  This was pagan teaching inserted into the church by those men spoken of in Jude 1 who “crept in unawares” perverting the truth.

You will notice also the convenient familiarity of the Egyptian association of “Amen” with the Mormons assertions.  Since God brought Israel up out of Egypt, Babylon has been re-upholstered as many other religions “under the sun god”.  All of it is a perversion of the Gospel.   And contrary to “research” of the deceived, Egyptian is NOT the oldest language on the planet.  One would have to assume that men of ancient times did not lie or deceive and that re-writing history was an affliction only seized upon by usurpers in the last four hundred years or so to buy this version of the “origins” of God”.

From Charles M. Larson’s Book “By His Own Hand Upon Papyrus” on the "Egyptian theme" of the founding of the Mormon church:

"The talk all over town was about the Irishman who had arrived in the village the day before, and had now set up an exhibit of, of all things, four Egyptian mummies.[17] It was spectacular! For a small price you could actually see and touch mysterious carvings, fragments of ancient writings, and even mummified human corpses, all of which had been on the earth since Bible times! The exhibit was extremely popular, and Mr. Chandler, the Irishman, did everything he could to accommodate the Saints during his stay.

In the Book of Mormon, they recalled, Mosiah had described a seer as "a man that can translate all records that are of ancient date" (Mosiah 8:13). Joseph, they knew, had been called of God as "Prophet, Seer, and Revelator" back when the Church was first organized. Joseph should be able to read and understand this writing! What a wonderful way of silencing his critics for good!" - Source, Larson, Charles; "By His Own Hand Upon Papyrus"

Yes how convenient.

I went back to the word “Amen” and followed the “footprints in the sand” left by the ancients to see where and how this all began to infect the children of God.  You see, they always leave a mark, so that their elite can map their way through the lie.  We found this to be true in the early days of this blog even with the false identities online in the Michael Jackson corporate fan community.  There was always part of a name or a number or a subject that was common in their numerous identities.

With this pattern of familiarity, words have been “added to” and “taken from”; changed relationships with their original meanings and metastasized into what they are today.  Since Amen-to-Amon was a common subject between Egyptian Mysticism and the American “Mormonism”, we will begin there.

Consuming “The Iniquity” from The Words

First I went back to the etymology of the word “Amen”.  We've been here before.

Old English, from Late Latin amen, from Ecclesiastical Greek amen, from Hebrew amen "truth," used adverbially as an expression of agreement (as in Deut. xxvii:26, I Kings i:36; compare Modern English verily, surely, absolutely in the same sense), from Semitic root a-m-n "to be trustworthy, confirm, support." Used in Old English only at the end of Gospels, otherwise translated as Soðlic! or Swa hit ys, or Sy! As an expression of concurrence after prayers, it is recorded from early 13c.

Amen is a basically new word.  In the Hebrew it is stated to mean “to be trustworthy” or “confirm” yet in the context as it is used in the Bible, it doesn’t match up with “to be trustworthy”.  Example:

"Blessed be the Lord God of Israel for ever and ever. And all the people said, Amen, and praised the Lord."

“All the people said  . . .” to be trustworthy . . . “and praised the Lord”?  No, it doesn’t fit. The word "truth" however, does fit.

It says also “translated as Soalic or Swa (hili?) ys or Sy!  Spelled another way “Si” is “yes” for affirmation in Spanish (and Italian) and “Oui” in French also means “yes”.  Would Amen mean “Yes”?  A strong “affirmation” of praise of . . . TRUTH.

“Amen” begins with an “A” which is what the “Alaph” has been turned into by the Greeks (Alpha) and Western languages.

Truth is associated with “Amen”. 

Love is associated with “Agape” (See “Exposing the Word”, October 14, 2014).  I followed some “footprints” of root words and this was the result:

aga (n.) -
title of rank, especially in Turkey, c.1600, from Turkish agha "chief, master, lord," related to East Turk. agha "elder brother." -

“Aga” is a prefix in the word “Agape”.  I looked it up for relevance only, but I didn’t expect to find that definition.

agape (n.) -
c.1600, from Greek agape "brotherly love, charity," from agapan "greet with affection, love," of unknown origin. Agape was used by early Christians for their "love feast" held in connection with the Lord's Supper. In modern use, often in simpler sense of "Christian love" (1856, frequently opposed to eros as "carnal or sensual love"). -

Also Charity, mentioned in the scripture we posted from “The Price Of Love” on the “one word fulfills the law” in 1 Corinthians 13:1-3.

charity (n.) -
mid-12c., "benevolence for the poor," from Old French charité "(Christian) charity, mercy, compassion; alms; charitable foundation" (12c., Old North French carité), from Latin caritatem (nominative caritas) "costliness, esteem, affection" (in Vulgate often used as translation of Greek agape "love" -- especially Christian love of fellow man -- perhaps to avoid the sexual suggestion.

Charity is the sacrifice of something for the benefit of another.  Agape used for both “love” and “charity” defines “self-sacrificing love” – to “bear one another’s burdens”.  Thus Jesus gave the “ultimate” sacrifice, dying so that others could have the life they were deceived out of having.

Back to “Amen”, I looked at the other words associated and listed under this and found “mana” and “mandrake”   This was interesting!

amen -
Old English, from Late Latin amen, from Ecclesiastical Greek amen, from Hebrew amen "truth," used adverbially as an expression of agreement (as in Deut. xxvii:26, I Kings i:36; compare Modern English verily, surely, absolutely in the same sense), from Semitic root a-m-n "to be trustworthy, confirm, support." Used in Old English only at the end of Gospels, otherwise translated as Soðlic! or Swa hit ys, or Sy! As an expression of concurrence after prayers, it is recorded from early 13c."

Mana, not to be confused with “manna” which is mentioned in the Bible 17 times as the “hidden” bread from heaven.

mana (n.) -
"power, authority, supernatural power," 1843, from Maori, "power, authority, supernatural power."

Mandrakes – the first “drug deal” in the Bible is when Rachel begs Leah for  the mandrakes her son found in exchange for a night with Jacob (they were both his wife).  Mandrakes = dragon.

mandrake (n.) -
narcotic plant, early 14c., mondrake, from Medieval Latin mandragora, from Latin mandragoras, from Greek mandragoras, probably from a non-Indo-European word. The word was in late Old English in its Latin form; folk etymology associated the second element with dragoun and substituted native drake in its place. The forked root is thought to resemble a human body and is said to shriek when pulled from the ground.

Out of Mandrake, sourced through “dragon”, we have covered “dragon” before.  It is associated with “serpent”, “giant seafish” and “to see” (Genesis 3 and the fall of man).

dragon (n.) -
early 13c., from Old French dragon, from Latin draconem (nominative draco) "huge serpent, dragon," from Greek drakon (genitive drakontos) "serpent, giant seafish," apparently from drak-, strong aorist stem of derkesthai "to see clearly," from PIE *derk- "to see." Perhaps the literal sense is "the one with the (deadly) glance."

The young are dragonets (14c.). Obsolete drake "dragon" is an older borrowing of the same word. Used in the Bible to translate Hebrew tannin "a great sea-monster," and tan, a desert mammal now believed to be the jackal.

“To see” (your eyes shall be opened and you shall be as gods, Genesis 3:3-6).  Out of “dragon” comes also “Dracula” (Drake).

Dracula (n.) -
the vampire, from in Bram Stoker's novel (1897). It was a surname of Prince Vlad II of Wallachia (d.1476), and means in Romanian "son of Dracul," literally "the dragon," from the name and emblem taken by Vlad's father, also named Vlad, c.1431 when he joined the Order of the Dragon, founded 1418 by Sigismund the Glorious of Hungary to defend the Christian religion from the Turks and crush heretics and schismatics.

What is Dracula most famous for?  Devouring the blood of his victims.  He either killed them or turned them into "vampires" - (overspreading of abominations).

“Schismatics” is the “art of promoting and causing division among people.  “Schism”.  Associated with “dragon” also is serpent, so I posted this as well.

serpent (n.)
c.1300, "limbless reptile," also the tempter in Gen. iii:1-5, from Old French serpent, sarpent "snake, serpent" (12c.), from Latin serpentem (nominative serpens) "snake; creeping thing," also the name of a constellation, from present participle of serpere "to creep," from PIE *serp- "to crawl, creep" (cognates: Sanskrit sarpati "creeps," sarpah "serpent;" Greek herpein "to creep," herpeton "serpent;" Albanian garper "serpent").

Used figuratively of things spiral or regularly sinuous, such as a type of musical instrument (1730). Serpent's tongue as figurative of venomous or stinging speech is from mistaken medieval notion that the serpent's tongue was its "sting."

The “tempter”.  Note also that “serpent” is associated with the “figurative” of things “spiral” (DNA, spiral staircase as opposed to the “ladder” Jacob saw – Jesus makes straight all things crooked).

Other terms under "Dragon" or "Serpent" is the Biblical Cockatrice (four mentions in King James)

cockatrice (n.) -
late 14c., from Old French cocatriz, altered (by influence of coq) from Late Latin *calcatrix, from Latin calcare "to tread" (from calx (1) "heel"), as translation of Greek ikhneumon, literally "tracker, tracer."

In classical writings, an Egyptian animal of some sort, the mortal enemy of the crocodile, which it tracks down and kills. This vague sense became hopelessly confused in the Christian West, and in England the word ended up applied to the equivalent of the basilisk. A serpent hatched from a cock's egg, it was fabled to kill by its glance and could be slain only by tricking it into seeing its own reflection. Belief in them persisted even among the educated because the word was used in the KJV several times to translate a Hebrew word for "serpent." In heraldry, a beast half cock, half serpent.

“To tread” (America’s first flag has a snake on it “Don’t Tread On Me”).  Root “calcare” from Latin “to tread” and “heel” from Greek.  This is also associated with classical writings from Egypt and in Western cultures associated with the “basilisk”.  This is where things get interesting.  I didn’t know what a “basilisk” was other than the word associating with “The Basilica” in Rome.  This is where the “crest” for “little king” came from, like those “auras” you see around the head of Christ depicted in early church reliefs.

basilisk (n.) -
c.1300, from Latin basiliscus, from Greek basiliskos "little king," diminutive of basileus "king" (see Basil); said by Pliny to have been so called because of a crest or spot on its head resembling a crown.

The basilisk has since the fourteenth century been confused with the Cockatrice, and the subject is now a complicated one. [T.H. White, "The Bestiary. A Book of Beasts," 1954]

Its breath and glance were said to be fatal. The South American lizard so called (1813) because it, like the mythical beast, has a crest. Also used of a type of large cannon, throwing shot of 200 lb., from 1540s.

“Confused”?  Perhaps, but the “serpent” or “cobra” has such a “crest” around its head, and the “cockatrice” is also associated, at least biblically, with the cobra/snake/serpent.  I don’t think it is a mistake.  You will see why.  Keep following the footprints.  Next I pulled up “Basilica”:

ba·sil·i·ca  (bə-sĭl′ĭ-kə) n. -
1. A public building of ancient Rome having a central nave with an apse at one or both ends and two side aisles formed by rows of columns, which was used as a courtroom or assembly hall.
b. A Christian church building of a similar design, having a nave with a semicircular apse, two or four side aisles, a narthex, and a clerestory.
2. Roman Catholic Church A church that has been accorded certain privileges by the pope."

An “apse” is what they call those dome-like structures in a cathedral at the end of a corridor or isle.  It looks like this:


Biologically it resembles this:

The hairpin DNA (ladder)

the Temple - the "figure of the true"

“Hairpin DNA” according to Standford U. produces hydrogen bonds where there usually would not be any, and aides in polymerase slippage in DNA mutation.  You can read more about that, here.  Many of your “basilicas” are structured to match this structure of the “hairpin” DNA, complete with the “nave” (where the “stones” are located, the bases of DNA), the aisles on either side (the “backbones” of the DNA strands on either side) and the “apse” (the “hairpin”).  We will come back to the “apse” in a minute.

Since “Leviathan” is also mentioned in the Bible as a serpent creature, I also included that below:

leviathan (n.) -
late 14c., "sea monster, sea serpent," also regarded as a form of Satan, from Late Latin leviathan, from Hebrew livyathan "dragon, serpent, huge sea animal," of unknown origin, perhaps related to liwyah "wreath," from root l-w-h- "to wind, turn, twist." Of powerful persons or things from c.1600. Hobbes's use is from 1651.

This is also described as the “sea monster”/”sea serpent” (that crooked serpent) mentioned twice in Job and Isaiah.  Also listed as “dragon” which shares the description of a “sea serpent” in its description above.  Also note the association to “wreath” from root “l-w-h” which it says “to wind, turn, twist”.

Now that we see how interconnected the Leviathan/serpent/apse/dragon/Dracula/drake/mandrakes are, let us look at apse.


The word “Asp” is mentioned six times in the Bible – yes, six times.  In every one of these mentions in the Bible, the Asp is associated or paired with mention of the “viper” or the “cockatrice”.

Is the “apse” an ambiguation of the Asp?  The etymology of “Asp” can be interchanged at least with one common description of the meaning:

Asp (n) –
poisonous snake, 1520s, earlier aspis (mid-14c.), from Old French aspe "asp" (13c.) or directly from Latin aspidem (nominative aspis), from Greek aspis "an asp, Egyptian viper," literally "shield;" the serpent so called probably in reference to its neck hood.

So the ambiguation is not an innocent one.  They change the letters around but the insiders know what the structures and the naming of them reference for there “plans”.  A description of the “Apse” structure pictured above:

apse  (ăps) n. -
1. Architecture A usually semicircular or polygonal, often vaulted recess, especially the termination of the sanctuary end of a church.
2. Astronomy Another name for apsis.

 From Latin apsis, meaning "fastening together," it is based on the notion that a vaulted space seems to be the joining together of arcs to form a circle.

Very similar to your “hood” on the viper or the “hairpin” turn of the mutating DNA.  It also mentions “apsis” in the Astronomical reference, so let us look at this also:

apsis (ˈæpsɪs) n, pl apsides (æpˈsaɪdiːz; ˈæpsɪˌdiːz) -
1. (Astronomy) Also called: apse either of two points lying at the extremities of an eccentric orbit of a planet, satellite, etc, such as the aphelion and perihelion of a planet or the apogee and perigee of the moon. The line of apsides connects two such points and is the principal axis of the orbit

A crude diagram to explain what this looks like

Another “resemblance” to the “dome” or the “hood” of a viper.  Remember also we covered the “dome” and the theory of “hollow earth” (“It’s Not About Flesh and Blood”, June 2014) complete with the globally placed sculptures of the curious “sphere within a sphere” known only to those who commissioned the work.

The “etymology” on “Apse” also describing the “hood” or “loop” or even “wheel”:

apse (n.) -
"semicircular extension at the end of a church," 1846, from Latin apsis "an arch, a vault," from Greek hapsis (Ionic apsis) "loop, arch," originally "a fastening, felloe of a wheel," from haptein "fasten together," which is of unknown origin. The original sense in Greek seems to have been the joining of the arcs to form a circle, especially in making a wheel.

Like spokes in a wheel” (Attorney Chernoff, Conrad Murray “Trial for the Murder of Michael Jackson, Day 1”, September 28, 2011) are connected as an “axis” point or an “apse”.

Physically, the “Apse” and the “Asp” have little to do with each other, but structurally and purposely, there are some heavy similarities as well as etymologically.

Diagram of Basilica

Head of Viper

“Are You Scared Yet”?

A couple of scriptures in the Bible mentioning the “Asp”:

Yet his meat in his bowels is turned, it is the gall of asps within him."

Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips:"

The Apse and the Asp have structural description similarities as well as etymological sources.  Now I want to show you an example of how a “word” can “metastacize” or more accurately, “mutate” from a base word to keep the “men of old, men of renown” in sync with each other on their plans.

Asp = poisonous snake.

Under this description were other words stemming from that root word.  This is one of them:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.