Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Son Of Man

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Saturday, August 1, 2015

Son Of Man

Declaring His Generation

"But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you."

(Please see “Defining The Jews”, “A Page In The Book” and “Manifestations”).

There has been an escalation of activity concerning the proselytizing of the “third temple”, and the “millennial reign” of Christ on earth and the “Pre-tribulation” rapture.  Once such “activity” took place in response to information I had put out with scripture and Jesus’ own words against this false teaching.

Because this “activity” was unprovoked and not addressing those who volunteered their opinions to the contrary, the very fact that two people seemed intent on accomplishing doubt in the validity of scripture raised more questions.  Interestingly enough, it was attempted over “the letter of the law” or in this case, the scriptures.

Had they bothered to post the scriptures to defend their position we might have had a discussion.  However, their defense digressed into questioning my “education” and understanding of the Hebrew language (letter of the law).  You and I have been over this here in the past, so I was not surprised by this line of attack.  When that did not work, they proceeded to attempt to apply doubt concerning the role of the Holy Ghost.  It was very interesting. 

This exchange was originally between a relative of mine and myself.  The other two were uninvited guests even though I welcomed the opportunity to understand their scriptural position.  The two were from the “Messianic Jew” discipline and one had said she was a “Messianic Pastor”.  What was learned and exposed was this:

They promote the “pre-millennial/Pre-tribulation rapture” doctrine as many other church denominations do, but they believe the “Holy Ghost” is an “error” in translation and should be Holy Spirit.

The problem with this is that both the Spirit and the Holy Ghost appear in the same verse in several books/chapters of the New Testament, and in one specifically the distinction is made between the two.  I will post both that I used as examples:

"And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost."

"(But this spake he of the Spirit, which they that believe on him should receive: for the Holy Ghost was not yet given; because that Jesus was not yet glorified.)"

To be clear, being “glorified” is something a bit more than being “highly esteemed” or “extolled”. Something more than being “praised” is to take place with Jesus:

glorified (adj.) -
"mid-14c., "invested with glory," past participle adjective from glorify. Weakened sense of "transformed into something better" is from 1821."

Matthew 17:1-5, Mark 9:1-5 uses the word “transfigured”; Luke 9:29-34 uses the words “fashion of his countenance was altered” and “appeared in glory”.  

We see under "glorification" -

glorification (n.) -
"early 15c. "admission to Heaven, exaltation" (theological), from Late Latin glorificationem (nominative glorificatio), noun of action from past participle stem of glorificare "to glorify" (see glorify). General sense by mid-19c. Also in 15c. as a term in alchemy, "action of refining; state of being refined.""

So then brings deeper understanding of why the Holy Ghost was not given until Jesus was “glorified” in Heaven.  Jesus was still “in the flesh” and not “glorified” yet.  Therefore the “Holy Ghost” is a distinction given to the post ascension of Jesus.

Other verses between Matthew 1:18 and Jude 1:20 attribute the Holy Ghost to Jesus, both in the conception of Mary and in he who God sends in Jesus’ name after his ascent into heaven.  Here is the scary part for which no other recourse is given:

"Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men."

"And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come."

But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation."

You see how very important this is.  Instead of responding to my questions about what Jesus and Paul said about the temple of the body, the subject digressed into jabs (apparently no one can possibly understand the Bible unless they can read Hebrew) and then the conversation was re-directed over the "English translation of Hebrew" into the "Holy Spirit" vs. “Holy Ghost”. 

These two said the Holy Ghost doesn't exist.  This is dangerous.

Do you remember what Balaam did to Israel?  God would not allow him to directly curse Israel, so Balaam for "riches" told Balak how to trick Israel into cursing themselves (Numbers 22 - 31). 

Anyone intimidated by what occurred this day could be lead into such a trap.   Aside from the fact that "Spirit" and "Holy Ghost" were translated in English in the same verse several times, how can their explanation stand?

They are not interested in what you believe.  Their agenda is to instill doubt in what you receive out of the Holy Bible, and apparently the Holy Ghost himself.  The root of this mentality is believing that if they don’t say the words, they haven’t committed the offense – but it is in their heart and God knows it.  This is the reversal of saying words in vain that are not in the heart – God knows it.

Jesus said distinctively we are to baptize IN THE NAME of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost:

"Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:"

Blaspheme against God, and against the son of man is forgiven - the unforgivable sin - the only one identified in the Bible that is unforgivable is the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost.  You need to know this and prepare yourself for these attempts to derail your faith or commit through your mouth an offense that is not forgiven.

There are 89 references to “Holy Ghost” in the scripture, all within the New Testament.  References to “Holy Spirit” appear only seven times; three in the old testament and four in the New Testament.  This does not count the instances of “Spirit” (anyone’s) or “Spirit of God” (29 times).  “Spirit of the Lord” appears 31 times, so there are variations of the “Spirit”.  However, there is a distinction between the “Spirit” and the “Ghost”, and in a couple of the Gospels it is made in the same verse.

Anyone still persistent in casting doubt on this hopes that you forget what “The Preacher” told us in Ecclesiastes:

"Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it."

Remember that God gave of Himself in His creating of everything.  Upon death of a living being, that spirit returns to God.  Jesus said upon his death in Luke 23:46,  “unto you I commend my spirit”.

The Holy Ghost is the “comforter” – John 14:26.  It is He that God sends in Jesus’ name, to teach us all things and “bring to remembrance” all things Jesus said to them (Remember the “Book of remembrance” written for them in Malachi 3:16,  when as “sons of men” they “return again” to see all the “oppressions done under the sun” – Ecclesiastes 4

Blasphemy against him is the unforgivable sin.  That is how important this is.  Jesus is the new life given us after man had fallen.  A word against the Holy Ghost sent by God in Jesus’ name will not be forgiven neither in this world or in the next.  The opportunity to be instructed on this through this exchange with those people is valuable for all of us; and I thank God it was sent for instruction and testing.

The Kingdoms They Ruled

Throughout the Bible, as we are told by Paul in his letter to the Hebrews:

"For it became him, for whom are all things, and by whom are all things, in bringing many sons unto glory, to make the captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings."

There is so much information packed into this one little verse, not to mention the whole letter to the Hebrews.  Remember “Hebrew” was first attributed to Abram, later named Abraham by God, which means “to cross over”.

God named Abram/Ivrim before Abraham committed that one act of love and faith and obedience foreshadowing the offing of a son, a part of him, for the iniquity of his people. 

Paul said “it became him, for whom are all things, and BY whom are all things in bringing MANY sons unto glory – to make the captain of their salvation perfect, through sufferings.

The substance with which we consist that David talks about in his Psalms numbered 139 is our book; among the innumerable to be opened on judgment.  Everything we are, were and will be is recorded in our book.  It is God that puts the law back in order.  It is God that restores the purity of that book.  His son, Jesus the Christ was the lamb provided for His people.

It is God that sent himself in the flesh a man named Jesus.  It was God that provided the substance and it was God that sent the Holy Ghost to provide Mary the seed that would become the captain of our salvation, the only begotten Son of God.

God selected and anointed the sons of men to teach the truth, preach the promise, to prophecy of the restoration and reinstall the hope to they who had forgotten, following false shepherds.

God chose these men not only from Israel, but those also of the Gentiles to scatter Israel in the midst of them.  That bondage was their protection and each individual would be tried and tested, to be refined and to be made white.

God chose Isaiah -

"The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me; because the Lord hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound;"

And God also chose Nebuchadnezzar –

"Nebuchadnezzar the king, unto all people, nations, and languages, that dwell in all the earth; Peace be multiplied unto you.   I thought it good to shew the signs and wonders that the high God hath wrought toward me.   How great are his signs! and how mighty are his wonders! his kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and his dominion is from generation to generation.

I Nebuchadnezzar was at rest in mine house, and flourishing in my palace:   I saw a dream which made me afraid, and the thoughts upon my bed and the visions of my head troubled me.   Therefore made I a decree to bring in all the wise men of Babylon before me, that they might make known unto me the interpretation of the dream."

And King Cyrus He chose –

Thus saith Cyrus king of Persia, All the kingdoms of the earth hath the Lord God of heaven given me; and he hath charged me to build him an house in Jerusalem, which is in Judah. Who is there among you of all his people? The Lord his God be with him, and let him go up."

King Cyrus gave the vessels of the house of God that were taken from Jerusalem to Babylon by Nebuchadnezzar to Sheshbazzar, prince and governor of Judah.  He laid the foundation of the temple and at the time it was told by Ezra, had not yet been finished.

Changing of the Guard

"And when the seventh month was come, and the children of Israel were in the cities, the people gathered themselves together as one man to Jerusalem.   Then stood up Jeshua the son of Jozadak, and his brethren the priests, and Zerubbabel the son of Shealtiel, and his brethren, and builded the altar of the God of Israel, to offer burnt offerings thereon, as it is written in the law of Moses the man of God.

And they set the altar upon his bases; for fear was upon them because of the people of those countries: and they offered burnt offerings thereon unto the Lord, even burnt offerings morning and evening.   They kept also the feast of tabernacles, as it is written, and offered the daily burnt offerings by number, according to the custom, as the duty of every day required;"

Here in Ezra, Moses is called the "man of God".  We know in Jude 1:9 that the devil sought possession of the body of Moses of which Michael withheld him from doing and rebuked him.  Note that upon building of the altar for which burnt offerings were offered morning and evening, they said "they set the altar upon his bases".

HIS bases.  This was the instruction given in building the house.  Understand with what you have already been told what this means (Zechariah 5:11).

They again attempt to lay the foundation of the temple.  Sheshbazzar is not mentioned here; instead it is Zerubbabel who is also governor of Judah (but not called "prince").  It is here they again bring in Masons and craftsmen (giving money to them) of Zidon and Tyre and for cedars from Lebanon as per King Cyrus of Persia.

"From the first day of the seventh month began they to offer burnt offerings unto the Lord. But the foundation of the temple of the Lord was not yet laid.   They gave money also unto the masons, and to the carpenters; and meat, and drink, and oil, unto them of Zidon, and to them of Tyre, to bring cedar trees from Lebanon to the sea of Joppa, according to the grant that they had of Cyrus king of Persia."

Singing in praise during this work did they mention, which the 2 Chronicles 34 testifies of the "other of the Levites" that could "skill of instruments of musick" as such is testified in repair of the house of the Lord.  And here also it is testified as to who it was that "destroyed the houses" - the "kings of Judah".

"There is a conspiracy among the men of Judah" - Jeremiah 11:9

Now further in Ezra, they sang in joy as the foundation of the house was now laid (and Sheshbazzar did not finish it, but Zerubbabel):

"And they sang together by course in praising and giving thanks unto the Lord; because he is good, for his mercy endureth for ever toward Israel. And all the people shouted with a great shout, when they praised the Lord, because the foundation of the house of the Lord was laid.

But many of the priests and Levites and chief of the fathers, who were ancient men, that had seen the first house, when the foundation of this house was laid before their eyes, wept with a loud voice; and many shouted aloud for joy:   So that the people could not discern the noise of the shout of joy from the noise of the weeping of the people: for the people shouted with a loud shout, and the noise was heard afar off."

The "ancient men" mentioned in the book of Jude "ordained to this condemnation" who were "of old, men of renown" (Genesis 6:4) and offspring of the angels that left their first habitation to become rulers of men in bondage; they did not want the house of God to be built.

The opening of Ezra chapter 4 reveals those adversaries who offer to "help them" build the house, seeking to cling with flattery and lies.  Zerubbabel told them no.

So then they sought to confound their efforts, weaken them, confuse them in their purpose.  They infiltrated then conspired to falsely accuse them against the kings of Persia for loss of power and riches.

"Then the people of the land weakened the hands of the people of Judah, and troubled them in building,   And hired counsellors against them, to frustrate their purpose, all the days of Cyrus king of Persia, even until the reign of Darius king of Persia.

And in the reign of Ahasuerus, in the beginning of his reign, wrote they unto him an accusation against the inhabitants of Judah and Jerusalem.   And in the days of Artaxerxes wrote Bishlam, Mithredath, Tabeel, and the rest of their companions, unto Artaxerxes king of Persia; and the writing of the letter was written in the Syrian tongue, and interpreted in the Syrian tongue."

The letter of accusation was written to Artaxerxes in the Syrian tongue (not the Jews language).  Why was this important to know? (See 2 Kings 18:26)

This obstruction perpetrated by the ancient men of Judah who saw the first house (for which this second was nothing in comparison – Haggai 2:3) and wept aloud and sought to weaken the hands of those building.  They even hired counselors to frustrate "their purpose" all the days of King Cyrus well into the rule of King Darius and then King Artaxerxes.  During this time did they write letters of accusation against them, alerting king Artaxerxes to the loss of tribute (taxes) in an attempt to instill fear of loss to those still laboring under the bondage of the lie.

Would it surprise you that in one form or another, this is still going on in the various governments of the earth today?

"Be it known unto the king, that the Jews which came up from thee to us are come unto Jerusalem, building the rebellious and the bad city, and have set up the walls thereof, and joined the foundations.   Be it known now unto the king, that, if this city be builded, and the walls set up again, then will they not pay toll, tribute, and custom, and so thou shalt endamage the revenue of the kings.

Now because we have maintenance from the king's palace, and it was not meet for us to see the king's dishonour, therefore have we sent and certified the king;   That search may be made in the book of the records of thy fathers: so shalt thou find in the book of the records, and know that this city is a rebellious city, and hurtful unto kings and provinces, and that they have moved sedition within the same of old time: for which cause was this city destroyed.

We certify the king that, if this city be builded again, and the walls thereof set up, by this means thou shalt have no portion on this side the river."

So it is told right there; fear of the New Jerusalem, Zion, the House of the Lord and the house for the "Name" of the Lord in the book of records of their fathers.  The book of old time which they have kept and have to this day which testifies of Jerusalem being a "rebellious city" and "hurtful unto kings" and their provinces and revenue, tribute and custom "of old time" for which cause that city was destroyed – by the kings of Judah – 2 Chronicles 34:11

They do not want a New Jerusalem unless it is one which they build, of men's hands; unless they can deceive the earth's people that the return of the son of man will be a prince of flesh that rules flesh and it's temples, tabernacles, cities, countries and kings.  And they cannot do that without the deception of a Christ that comes before the tribulation, brings a false rapture and a thousand year rule in "this world".

The Bible foretells of their plans from the beginning; from the garden of God.  The prophets of the Bible were chosen by God through time to pull God's people from this delusion; and the Jesus these Jews deny, claiming he has not fulfilled the prophecy seek to move times and laws to blind you from the fact that he most certainly has. 

Had Jesus not fulfilled the prophecy of the very prophets they have slain to keep silent; they would not have been so motivated to seek the son of man and the morning star he was given by Christ himself in Revelation 2:25-29.

The Last House For the Name

"And they shall scoff at the kings, and the princes shall be a scorn unto them: they shall deride every strong hold; for they shall heap dust, and take it.   Then shall his mind change, and he shall pass over, and offend, imputing this his power unto his god."

Remember back in May of 2014, we first learned the actual meaning of the name “Bethlehem”, which the Bible tells us is also “The City of David”, which is also “Ephratah/Ephrath” and also Zion – See “Receiving Thy Sight”.

Remember what goes forth out of Zion?  “The Law” – Isaiah 2:3.

Habakkuk is also told by the Lord that “his mind shall change” and “he shall pass over and offend”.  This is attributed also to the vile one in Daniel 11:40.  He shall “pass over”; and in Genesis 49:22 the branches of Joseph run “over the wall”.  But Habakkuk speaks of the one whose “mind shall change” who will “pass over” as the vile one in Daniel 11 does; and further Habakkuk is told by the Lord that the vision he is receiving is for “an appointed time” but at the end it shall speak and though it tarry, wait for it.” 

Habakkuk is then told that when it comes it will not tarry; and he is told something about he whose mind shall change: “His soul which is lifted up is not upright in him, but the just shall live by his faith”.

"I will stand upon my watch, and set me upon the tower, and will watch to see what he will say unto me, and what I shall answer when I am reproved.   And the Lord answered me, and said, Write the vision, and make it plain upon tables, that he may run that readeth it.

For the vision is yet for an appointed time, but at the end it shall speak, and not lie: though it tarry, wait for it; because it will surely come, it will not tarry.   Behold, his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith.

Yea also, because he transgresseth by wine, he is a proud man, neither keepeth at home, who enlargeth his desire as hell, and is as death, and cannot be satisfied, but gathereth unto him all nations, and heapeth unto him all people:   Shall not all these take up a parable against him, and a taunting proverb against him, and say, Woe to him that increaseth that which is not his! how long? and to him that ladeth himself with thick clay!"

The Just shall live by his faith yet his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him.  His mind shall change, Habakkuk was told, and he will pass over and offend.  He transgresses by wine, he is proud, he neither stays home nor can be satisfied.  Parables and taunting proverbs will be taken up against him, accusing him of increasing what is not his; and lading himself with thick clay.

"Thou hast consulted shame to thy house by cutting off many people, and hast sinned against thy soul.   For the stone shall cry out of the wall, and the beam out of the timber shall answer it."

We know this is at the end because Habakkuk is told “in the end it shall speak and not lie: though it tarry, wait for it” for it will come and will not tarry.  The just shall live by his faith.  Isaiah is told something similar about the end time:

"Behold, my servant shall deal prudently, he shall be exalted and extolled, and be very high.   As many were astonied at thee; his visage was so marred more than any man, and his form more than the sons of men:

So shall he sprinkle many nations; the kings shall shut their mouths at him: for that which had not been told them shall they see; and that which they had not heard shall they consider."

Is this Jesus that Isaiah is prophesying about?  Yes.  Yes it is.

Then God says through Isaiah:

"He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not.   Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted.

But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.   All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all."

Is Jesus the end times servant here?  Let the prophets and the apostles remind us.  Jesus said the world would hate his disciples because it hated him first.  Jesus was the sacrifice and the shedding of blood for the remission of sins but . . . Paul told us that the remission of sin could not occur until after the shedding of blood - Hebrews 9:22.  In this instruction Paul tells us exactly how Jesus fulfills the prophecy, and why the prophecy is not fulfilled all at one time.  (A thousand years is as a day and a day as a thousand years with the Lord).

This whole chapter of Hebrews explains why and how Jesus, or the Spirit of He who Jesus was in the flesh; fulfills the prophecy in more than one vessel, at two different stretches of time (by man's sight).  The blood of Christ was "offered" without spot and for this cause he was the mediator of the new testament.  Where there is a testament there must also be the death of the testator - all things by the law are purged with blood - without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sin - They way into the holiest (second tabernacle) was not yet made manifest while the first tabernacle was still standing.

Jesus offered himself "once" and it says "but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.  And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:  So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation".

The life is in the blood - The "seed" is the Word of God".  He was offered "to bear the sins of many" - and the "testimony" was to be put into the side of the Ark upon the time that God provided it - Exodus 25:16

As we continue please remember that time is bound by God, not binding to God.  God does not need, nor is He bound to "time".  Men were given time for this transgression to complete.  It is for man.   

Let’s return to what Isaiah in chapter 53 was telling us about the “faithful servant”: we had questioned the previous verses describing a “man of sorrows” and “acquainted with grief” – none of the Gospel accounts describe him this way as he traveled, taught his disciples and revealed the Gospel to the people who followed and thronged around him.  The only time Jesus is recorded as crying was when Lazarus’ sister confronted him when he died and Jesus felt her pain.  Many teaching from this chapter in Isaiah attribute that “man of sorrows” to the man on the cross, and they wouldn’t be wrong.

It is harder however, to associate Jesus to the servant described in verses eight and nine:

"He was taken from prison and from judgment: and who shall declare his generation? for he was cut off out of the land of the living: for the transgression of my people was he stricken.   And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death; because he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his mouth."

Jesus did not escape judgment.  He was sentenced to death.  He was falsely accused and hung on the cross.  His blood was shed for us, so he did not escape death. 

Jesus did not make his grave with the wicked and the rich in his death.  Jesus was buried in a virgin tomb hewn out of rock by a disciple of his named Joseph of Arimathaea.  There was no one else buried there.  In subsequent verses of Isaiah 53, we also learn that this person will sacrifice his soul, he will “see his seed”; and “by his knowledge” God’s “righteous servant shall justify many” and it says “for he shall bear their iniquities”:

"Yet it pleased the Lord to bruise him; he hath put him to grief: when thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin, he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days, and the pleasure of the Lord shall prosper in his hand.   He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities."

Zechariah was slain between the porch and the altar (Matthew 23:35) because he knew the answer to this piece of the prophecy.  Zechariah was shown how God's righteous servant would fulfill the promise to bear the iniquities of many.

Zechariah was shown how this person would "see his seed", be buried with the wicked and the rich but have his days prolonged; and justify many " by his knowledge" because "he shall bear their iniquities".

Zechariah was shown how this would be accomplished in the vision of the flying roll and the ephah in Zechariah chapter 5.

Jesus couldn’t do this before he provided the “seed” which is “the Word of God” (Luke 8:11), which is the life in the blood (Leviticus 17:11) because Jesus was pure (Psalms 119:140, John 1:14).  Therefore Jesus could not “become the curse” (Zechariah 5:3-4, Galatians 3:13) until after the seed “is in the barn” (Haggai 2:19).  Jesus was “made to be sin” for us, 2 Corinthians 5:21.  Do you understand?  And those those who “look for him will he appear a second time WITHOUT SIN unto salvation” – Hebrews 9:28.

This is why both Jesus (Matthew 24:4-30) and Paul (2 Thessalonians 2:3-8)  warned about the “man of sin, son of perdition” appearing first, before the son of man “destroys him with the brightness of his coming”. 

In the final verse of Isaiah 53, God through Isaiah reveals the one who will be given a portion with the great, and who will divide the spoil with the strong.  He would bare the sin of many and make intercession for the transgressors.

"Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the strong; because he hath poured out his soul unto death: and he was numbered with the transgressors; and he bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors."

This is he whom Jesus will give the morning star in Revelation 2:26-28, for he will overcome the polluting of his sanctuary when it is cleansed during the two thousand, three hundred days foretold in Daniel 8:14.

Look at this with eyes that are not bound by “time” which would otherwise make all this impossible in its teaching.  Man measures by “time”, so God gave us “time” as a tool to look for the things of men in this prophecy.

Isaiah asked “who will declare his generation” in Isaiah 53:8 and also Peter repeated in Acts 8:33?  If Jesus was the “Word made flesh” and the “Word was in the beginning with God and the Word was God”, do we remember where God said He would commune with us?  That’s right, from above the mercyseat – that thing about the Ark of the Covenant that Paul could not “now speak particularly” (Hebrews 9:5).

Where is the Ark?  In the “tabernacle called the holiest of all” which is behind the “second veil” (Hebrews 9:2-5) – and “the way into the holiest was not made manifest while the first tabernacle was still standing” (Hebrews 9:8).  The first tabernacle is called the “sanctuary” . . . of strength – Daniel 11:31.  Do you understand?

Is there a modern person held very high and extolled who was also despised, oppressed and afflicted “in our generation”?  Yes there is.

Is there a person in our generation who was buried with the wicked and the rich in his death, but who’s life was prolonged so the pleasure of the Lord will prosper in his hand?

Yes, yes there is.  And almost everyone in the world knows his name, for that name is also in the Bible – His name is Michael (Daniel 12:1).

1 comment:

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.