Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Caught In The Matrix

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Wednesday, August 17, 2016

Caught In The Matrix

The “String” Is Not a Theory

"But Solomon was building his own house thirteen years, and he finished all his house.   He built also the house of the forest of Lebanon; the length thereof was an hundred cubits, and the breadth thereof fifty cubits, and the height thereof thirty cubits, upon four rows of cedar pillars, with cedar beams upon the pillars.

And it was covered with cedar above upon the beams, that lay on forty five pillars, fifteen in a row.   And there were windows in three rows, and light was against light in three ranks.   And all the doors and posts were square, with the windows: and light was against light in three ranks."

It seems like a really long, endless trek in the desert.  I can almost feel the impatience of the Israelites as they wonder the purpose of leaving the security of the bondage of Egypt.  They had to completely depend on God and Moses.

Last night, a dream left me a little disconcerted:  My husband had hidden my computer and I was angry with him.  I raced through the house looking in rooms.  Upstairs in our bedroom (we don’t have a two-story in real life), I found two suitcases hidden under the covers that hung over the foot of our bed.  I lifted them onto the bed and took the parts out.  He didn’t want me to publish what I was going to publish.

As I was waking from the dream (still angry with him but relieved I found my records), God gave me words of the relation of His Spirit and the human soul and what to say; in what words to say it.

What is us is of Him.  Everything is of Him.   What the rebellious ones are trying to find they cannot find even though it is in everything.

He said to me as I was waking: “I am all and in all.  I give life to which I give life.  The soul of man is of Me. The form of the soul is framed with Me.”

He also told me “I move together, I move apart.  I am in the living and the non living.  I say what has breath and what does not.”

As I woke, I could see stars and the universe surrounded me, and the last words I  heard as they faded from my conscience were “When the end comes, it will come through everything created.”

He will come through everything, and I understood that not all will live again.

What is coming is coming.  I cannot stop it, science cannot stop it, governments cannot stop it, CERN cannot stop it.

These men that are looking for this element, this particle that is “God” cannot stop it.  

What God is, is what gives us life.  It is beyond biological chemistry or exchanges of amino alphabet letters from instructions sent from the nucleus of our cells.  They may be able to increase the difficulty with which an individual connects to God, but they cannot stop it, because even in the dead, He is there.  When the fire is brought forth from the midst of all, The Word within us is the only thing that will save us; that is the blood of Jesus Christ and the seed of Faith.

The grain within us that God has given us is not something that can be seen.   When He told me “Spirit of the letter”, that is what He meant.  Spirit cannot be seen with fleshly eyes.

There is no need to figure out how this will happen.  He has already shown his servants what this will look like/feel like in visions.  Those like Paul have described this being “changed in an instant, in the twinkling of an eye”.  Others have been shown in visions the string or cord, the breaking of the ceiling and the blinding light coming through.

God’s servants, where ever they are in the world have already seen or felt, or smelled or tasted a blade of grass, a leaf of the tree or the vine or heard the heart of a bird as if from within them because that is what is God.  He is that which connects us to everything in His creation.

Some of God’s servants have “been here before”; and in this time, this vessel, they are to tell others what life really is and preach the Word that fulfills all the law: the law which curse was brought forth because of man.

What is solid to us now is vapor in the Spirit.  What is valued to flesh is vanity in the Spirit.  And the power of love is not known to the flesh.  None know how incredible the gravity of the Spirit is, and how it gives that strength to those who believe.  But if they have seen him face to face and beheld that love in the soul, how blessed they are to sow it so that fields of it manifest the multitude that no man can number.

The blessing of knowing that love; it is a force stronger than any composite of metal man can make.  It is stronger than granite, yet flows and undulates softly so it can penetrate the heart.  It is stronger than magnets and none can pull you from it.   The strongest of brutes are brought to their knees in tears because love purged and cleansed their very being; leaving a completely new child of God.

That love pulls your soul to the face of Christ where nothing else exists at that moment but him.  The human being who falls in love knows not even the power of this love, but through Christ.

Fait Accompli

The workings of the children of iniquity will weary a soul.  As the scriptures tell us of the little horn that subdues three kings and is diverse from the rest:

And he shall speak great words against the most high, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change the times and the laws. . .”

And they shall be given unto his hand for a time, times and the dividing of time.  But the judgment shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion, to consume and destroy it unto the end . . .

There is a passing of seven years in the time we observe, from the day Michael surnamed Jackson was taken out of the way.  And nothing is heard but rumors and tricks and clues of a hoax.  We are now into the beginning of the eighth year.  Was he Joash, hidden away for six years, revealed in the seventh that he was alive; told in the book of the Kings?

Is he Saul who was “turned into another man” as foretold by Samuel, who showed Saul “the Word of God” in the first book of Samuel?

Is he Nebuchadnezzar, living as a beast such as the Ox eating grass while seven times pass over him written in the book of Daniel?

Is he the man Sheshbazzar, Prince and governor of Judah; who laid the foundation of the temple, turned into Zerubbabel, governor of Judah; who also laid the foundation of the temple (and who’s hands would finish it), in the books of Ezra and Zechariah?

What of the “tarrying” mentioned by the prophet Habukkuk?  That it would come at the appointed time and though it tarry wait for it, for surely is shall not tarry?”

We know that the angel in Daniel chapter 10 revealed to Daniel that he had come from the time of the end where he and Michael fought with the prince of Persia, and that he had to go back again; and that Michael was the only one who stood with him in these things.

Our time and God’s time, and that of the quickened are not in the same measure.  Ecclesiastes tells us this; and Peter tells us this.  Paul also told us this:

I knew a man in Christ above fourteen years ago, (whether in the body , I cannot tell; or whether out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;) such an one caught up to the third heaven.   And I knew such a man, (whether in the body, or out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;)   How that he was caught up into paradise, and heard unspeakable words, which is not lawful for a man to utter.

Paul could not distinguish whether in the body or out of the body; and he does not distinguish whether this “in the body or out of the body” was in reference to himself or the one he saw caught up.  But a specific time of fourteen years is mentioned.

We have two possible connections to the Michael in Revelation 12 and Daniel 12 (which is the prince mentioned in Daniel chapters seven through twelve) and we know not if Paul saw this man caught up “in the body” or “out of the body”.

Paul goes on to say that in such a one he will glory, but for himself he will not glory but in his infirmities.  He did not want people to think of him higher than what they saw him; and that he would only speak the truth.  According to Jesus only one can fit this description, of the man that Paul saw “caught up”: 

And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the son of man which is in heaven.  And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the son of man be lifted up.

That is because Michael and Jesus are the same:  In heaven they are one: in flesh they were different as were John the Baptist different from Elijah, but were one in Spirit, Matthew 17:9-13.  They are made one again when the man child was caught up to God and to his throne.

I listened to a song recently.  I’ll only repeat a few of the lyrics here.  It is the sister of such a one:

"No Sleeep"

[Janet Jackson]
48 hours of love, It's gonna be a weekend marathon
So you better get ready, my king
Cause I'ma be the queen of insomnia
Stay wide awake for every moment we spend together
Cause every second you’re away feels like forever

[Chorus: Janet Jackson]
You’re missing me, I’m missing you
Whenever we meet, we ain’t gonna get no sleep
When I get to be together with you
It’s fait accompli, we ain’t gonna get no sleep
Source:”No Sleeep

“Fait Accompli” translates “done deal”.  A love song to her “king”, what did she mean by “done deal”? 

Is it the “plan to work and work our master plan” from “2300 Jackson Street”?  (“Unto two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed” – Daniel 8:14).

The rap portion of Janet’s song:

J Cole
"I’m sure, either you’re the one or I’m caught in the matrix
Staying up for hours while we talk and get wasted
Not from weed smoke, or this cheap wine
Drunk off love we both feel deep down
But too scared to say cause we know how this seems
Thinking, maybe we’d be better off friends with benefits
For the moment this adrenaline, got me feeling like a kid again
Butterflies like MJ, had to fit it in
My schedule, check the bezel, gotta escape by six
Damn, how’d it get so late so quick?
The sun rising (already?) until the next time

Janet released this song on October 2, 2015, not even a year ago.  “Butterflies”, these I saw in my room as a sign after waking from a dream.

Michael: Trust God

Between 5:17 and 5:28 
Kill Michael?

Patience is not something that comes easily to me.  There are times when I was quite surprised that God didn’t drop me on my seat: there has been a tantrum or two; and there are also times where He has rewarded patience.

You keep going even as everything is against you.  You hold tight to the things God has revealed to you, and you hold onto the Word that is revealed to you.  You plant your feet, you stand your ground and not be moved.  Keep on, and those things God revealed to you will come to fruition.

Five years ago a comfort was sent to me.  I dreamed I received a call from an unknown number.  She told me they had been trying to call, they used different phones each time and it couldn’t be a land line.  She asked me to meet “us” at the AME church.   They came out of the church, just her and her mother who was also the mother of Michael.  And her mother told me not to worry about them and to keep doing what I was doing, that they were okay.  Michael’s sister thanked me for meeting them there and said to me, “This was good.  We had to find a safe place.  No one knows us here”.

The message has been remembered, for those who most kindly and gently request that I “stop trying to figure things out”.  I already know what’s going to happen.  The scriptures declare it.  Dreams were sent to me of it.  It’s the ones who work in darkness that are being exposed.

Two different people recently have showed me things that will be helpful in revealing this to others:  One sent me a story and another sent me an image.

The Story

The story I was sent was actually a movie series called “Stranger Things”.  Strangely enough I saw an advertisement for this show on “ME TV” recently.

While the show itself did not hold any clues, it did include in the storyline an MK-Ultra victim/Empath named “Eleven” who befriends a boy named Michael.  But more interesting than this were the write ups on other blogs about this series that this person sent me.   The person said this reminded her of the information I had posted about CERN.

One of the blogs she sent me quoted a paragraph from that blog.  It states that the setting of the series was supposed to be “Montauk” (which we’ve also covered here before, and a video on it interviewing Preston Nichols) but was instead made to take place in Hawkings, Illinois. 

The author of the blog further stated that the name of the “town” in the series seemed to be a homage to Stephen Hawking, and it mentioned his “M-theory”.  StephenHawking was brought up on the blog about CERN and quoted in a resource about the dangers of what CERN was doing.  This was on “They Breacheth A Wall”.

Since we had briefly skimmed over Hawkings theories on “spacetime”, I followed this “yellow brick road”.  This is where it took me.


I have to be honest with you, I have never heard of this before.  It is interesting that the “M-Theory” is connected to the “spacetime” experiments; and yet the super-secret “JASON” (July, August, September, October, November) society encases within it another group:  This other group of which the murdered James Forestal was once a member, was called the “MJ-12” or “Majestic 12” (MJ = Michael Jackson: M-theory = Michael quickened, just a theory). 

Wikipedia described the M-theory as this:

"M-theory is a theory in physics that unifies all consistent versions of superstring theory. The existence of such a theory was first conjectured by Edward Witten at a string theory conference at the University of Southern California in the spring of 1995. Witten's announcement initiated a flurry of research activity known as the second superstring revolution. . .

Although a complete formulation of M-theory is not known, the theory should describe two- and five-dimensional objects called branes and should be approximated by eleven-dimensional supergravity at low energies. . . Attempts to connect M-theory to experiment typically focus on compactifying its extra dimensions to construct candidate models of our four-dimensional world, although so far none has been verified to give rise to physics as observed at, for instance, the Large Hadron Collider." - Source, Wikipedia

So this has so far not generated a successful experiment and has not been tested at the CERN LHC (that the public has been told).  The interesting key words I found here to dig further were the “two and five dimensional objects” called “branes”; and the mention of “string” and “superstring theory”.  What is a brane?

Brane -

"In string theory and related theories such as supergravity theories, a brane is a physical object that generalizes the notion of a point particle to higher dimensions. For example, a point particle can be viewed as a brane of dimension zero, while a string can be viewed as a brane of dimension one. . . The word "brane" comes from the word "membrane" which refers to a two-dimensional brane.

Branes are dynamical objects which can propagate through spacetime according to the rules of quantum mechanics. They have mass and can have other attributes such as charge. A p-brane sweeps out a (p+1)-dimensional volume in spacetime called its worldvolume. Physicists often study fields analogous to the electromagnetic field, which live on the worldvolume of a brane.[2]

In string theory, D-branes are an important class of branes that arise when one considers open strings. As an open string propagates through spacetime, its endpoints are required to lie on a D-brane. The letter "D" in D-brane refers to a certain mathematical condition on the system known as the Dirichlet boundary condition. The study of D-branes in string theory has led to important results such as the AdS/CFT correspondence, which has shed light on many problems in quantum field theory." - Source, Wikipedia

Do you have any idea what that means?  I take D vitamins but I don’t know what a D-brane is.  D-brane had a clickable link to another wiki page.  That one tells us:

In mathematics, the Dirichlet (or first-type) boundary condition is a type of boundary condition, named after Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet (1805–1859).[1] When imposed on an ordinary or a partial differential equation, it specifies the values that a solution needs to take on along the boundary of the domain.

The question of finding solutions to such equations is known as the Dirichlet problem. In engineering applications, a Dirichlet boundary condition may also be referred to as a fixed boundary condition." - Source, Wikipedia

So a D-brane is a two dimensional membrane with a fixed boundary position.  The “end points” of an “open string” are required to lie on a D-brane to propagate through spacetime.  Again, Wikipedia also has a separate wiki page on “spacetime”.

Spacetime -

"In physics, spacetime is any mathematical model that combines space and time into a single interwoven continuum. Since 300 BCE, the spacetime of our universe has historically been interpreted from a Euclidean space perspective, which regards space as consisting of three dimensions, and time as consisting of one dimension, the "fourth dimension". - Source, Wikipedia

Now we know the “fourth dimension” is identified as “time”.  If we look up again in the last couple of Wiki paragraphs, the “M-theory” describes our world as being a “four dimensional world”: three dimensional space, and time, the fourth dimension.  Therefore “spacetime” is the single, interwoven continuum of the four dimensions:

Continuum (Measurement)

"In physics, for example, the space-time continuum model describes space and time as part of the same continuum rather than as separate entities. A spectrum in physics, such as the electromagnetic spectrum, is often termed as either continuous (with energy at all wavelengths) or discrete (energy at only certain wavelengths).

In contrast, quantum mechanics uses quanta, certain defined amounts (i.e. categorical amounts) which are distinguished from continuous amounts." - Source, Wikipedia

Some of those in the Michael Jackson fan community may remember stories published ofMichael going to Canada to study “4-D” technology, for his concert production “This Is It”.

Four-dimensional space

"In mathematics, four-dimensional space ("4D") is a geometric space with four dimensions. It typically is more specifically four-dimensional Euclidean space, generalizing the rules of three-dimensional Euclidean space. . . In modern physics, space and time are unified in a four-dimensional Minkowski continuum called spacetime, whose metric treats the time dimension differently from the three spatial dimensions (see below for the definition of the Minkowski metric/pairing). Spacetime is not a Euclidean space." - Source, Wikipedia

We included a definition on “Euclidean pace” previously on “Time-2-believe”.  On that article, scalar technology and Tesla’s theories were discussed.  The “four-dimensional” in mathematics defines four-dimensional Euclidean space; and “spacetime” is not a Euclidean space.  For this reason the “time” dimensions are  treated differently than the three spatial dimensions.  “Scalar” in mathematics is used to define a vector space.  A scalar can only hold one value at a time.  In Geometry, “4-dimension in geometry is described as such:

"The geometry of 4-dimensional space is much more complex than that of 3-dimensional space, due to the extra degree of freedom.

Just as in 3 dimensions there are polyhedra made of two dimensional polygons, in 4 dimensions there are 4-polytopes made of polyhedra. In 3 dimensions there are 5 regular polyhedra known as the Platonic solids. In 4 dimensions there are 6 convex regular 4-polytopes, the analogues of the Platonic solids. Relaxing the conditions for regularity generates a further 58 convex uniform 4-polytopes, analogous to the 13 semi-regular Archimedean solids in three dimensions. Relaxing the conditions for convexity generates a further 10 nonconvex regular 4-polytopes." - Source, Wikipedia

What this looks like in visual conception; imagine these angles all being fluidly movable and interchangeable,like a multi-dimensional Rubics Cube. 

4-dimensional geometry

What is interesting is that the explanation for the four dimensions is described “within the square”, or a circle (time) within the square (the special three dimensions).  This reminded me of this famous drawing:

"...within the square"

D-vinci vertruvianman

Further down on that subject of "Four-dimensional space" is the "Clifford torus"

Clifford torus -

"In geometric topology, the Clifford torus is a special kind of torus sitting inside the unit 3-sphere S3 in R4, the Euclidean space of four dimensions. . .

The Clifford torus is an example of a square torus, because it is isometric to a square with opposite sides identified. It is further known as a Euclidean 2-torus (the "2" is its topological dimension); figures drawn on it obey Euclidean geometry as if it were flat, whereas the surface of a common "doughnut"-shaped torus is positively curved on the outer rim and negatively curved on the inner. Although having a different geometry than the standard embedding of a torus in three-dimensional Euclidean space, the square torus can also be embedded into three-dimensional space, by the Nash embedding theorem; one possible embedding modifies the standard torus by a fractal set of ripples running in two perpendicular directions along the surface.[1]" - Source, Wikipedia

The image given to explain the “Clifford Torus” or the “Square Torus” is this:

gif/Cliff-tor Abba

This appears on the rotating Clifford torus as well: Abba is Abba. 

Another image appears on that page for the “Clifford-torus”:

Clifford-torus projection

Stereographic projection of a Clifford torus:
the set of points (cos(a), sin(a), cos(b), sin(b)),
which is a subset of the 3-sphere.

There is an “a” and “b” for “cos” and an “a” and “b” for “sin”.  (Front/Back: Ab/bA, or, the beginning and the end, the first and the last “A”).

What is "sin"?  Why do they call it that?

What strikes me, accompanied with this diagram is the explanation that ". . . the square torus can also be embedded into three-dimensional space, by the Nash embedding theorem; one possible embedding modifies the standard torus by a fractal set of ripples running in two perpendicular directions along the surface."

The “stereographic projections” looks like the described “donut”.  It also looks like this:

Svd/Flat Earth

If the “flat earth” theories are correct and earth and the other “plane-ts” are not spheres; we can also theorize that earth, given Biblical descriptions, is a donut-shaped disk on the surface.  The “hoary frost of heaven” is the “garment” holding the waters.  The “positively curved on the outer rim” Ice shelf of Antarctica holding in the seas; and the “negatively curved inner rim”, where the opening to the “bottomless pit” or the “North Pole” would be located.

Add to this the description of the “fractal ripples” and you have a description of the electromagnetic (gravity) of  the dipole earth (the hydrogen bond is a dipole-dipole attraction [source], remember this?  From “Simplicity and the Serpent”).

A Dipole-dipole attraction is a weak electromagnetic interaction.  A “dipole-dipole” illustrated looks like this:



Back to M-theory where we began this road, :

"M-theory is a theory in physics that unifies all consistent versions of superstring theory.   the theory should describe two- and five-dimensional objects called branes and should be approximated by eleven-dimensional supergravity at low energies. . ." - Source, Wikipedia

M-Theory unifies all consistent versions of superstring theory; and should describe two and five-dimensional objects called branes.

A brane is a physical object that generalizes the notion of a point particle to higher dimensions.   In string theory, the “end points” of an “open string” are required to lie on a D-brane to propagate through spacetime.  A D-brane or "Dirichlet"-brane is a boundary position called a fixed boundary position.  And Spacetime of course, is the “continuum” that describes our “four dimensional world” to include the three spatial dimension and the fourth, being “time”.

Now what is string theory?  This is where I found something.

String theory -

"In physics, string theory is a theoretical framework in which the point-like particles of particle physics are replaced by one-dimensional objects called strings. It describes how these strings propagate through space and interact with each other.  In string theory, one of the many vibrational states of the string corresponds to the graviton, a quantum mechanical particle that carries gravitational force. Thus string theory is a theory of quantum gravity. Source, Wikipedia

A string is a one dimensional object that replaces the point-like particles of particle physics.  One of it’s vibrational states corresponds to a quantum mechanical particle called the “graviton”.  It is a theory of quantum gravity.

If a “string” is a one-dimensional object that replaces particles of particle physics (Large Hadron Collider – CERN), does it exist in this dimension?  Is it also a theory of “time”?  There was more:

String theory is a broad and varied subject that attempts to address a number of deep questions of fundamental physics. String theory has been applied to a variety of problems in black hole physics, early universe cosmology, nuclear physics, and condensed matter physics, “ – Source, Wikipedia

Wow:  Black hole physics, nuclear physics and condensed matter physics?  Remember, in string theory, D-branes are a class of branes that arise when one considers open strings. As an open string propagates through spacetime, its endpoints are required to lie on a D-brane.  I don’t even know now to begin explaining this. Mathematically I can’t.  But in concept, I can see it.  The reason I can see it is because I pulled it in the 1980 dream about the rapture (written here).  The string I pulled was attached to a chandelier or a lamp – the “golden cord” God wanted me to pull which opened up the ceiling/firmament through which His light came and I was taken up.  I kept going:

Because string theory potentially provides a unified description of gravity and particle physics, it is a candidate for a theory of everything, a self-contained mathematical model that describes all fundamental forces and forms of matter. Despite much work on these problems, it is not known to what extent string theory describes the real world or how much freedom the theory allows to choose the details.” Source, Wikipedia

It’s funny to me when they mention “real world”; as if this is it.  Did the string theory have anything to do with time (fourth dimension), or does it have more to do with gravity?  Perhaps both?  Note they call it a “candidate for a theory of everything”.

Further along this article, string theory was abandoned, it says, in favor of quantum chromodynamics.  (Chromo-some: color-body/a being).  What is “chromodynamics”?  According to this article, it is the theory of strong interactions, a fundamental force describing interactions between quarks and gluons which make up hadrons, such as the proton, nutron and pion.  It is also an important part of the standard model of particle physics, yet they are now going beyond that.  (Why do they call it “chromo-dynamics”?)

Now we know this is essential to what they are doing in and with the Large Hadron Collider.  The “Quantum chromodynamics binding energy” or gluon binding energy is the energy binding quarks together into hadrons.  The “quark gluon condensate” is exactly the “particle” or “element” that was mentioned in the video interview by Anthony Patch back in June.  So this does have to do with “time”.  Now “string theory” is a large part of this, called the “bosonic (Higgs Boson) string theory:

The earliest version of string theory, bosonic string theory, incorporated only the class of particles known as bosons. It later developed into superstring theory, which posits a connection called supersymmetry between bosons and the class of particles called fermions. - Source, Wikipedia

We’ve heard of “Symmetry” before.  Didn’t “CERN” produce a mini-film called “Symmetry” (we covered on “The Colorful Truth”)?

Video Symmetry, CERN

Then we get to the “Eleven/11”:

Five consistent versions of superstring theory were developed before it was conjectured in the mid-1990s that they were all different limiting cases of a single theory in eleven dimensions known as M-theory. In late 1997, theorists discovered an important relationship called the AdS/CFT correspondence, which relates string theory to another type of physical theory called a quantum field theory.

One of the challenges of string theory is that the full theory does not have a satisfactory definition in all circumstances. Another issue is that the theory is thought to describe an enormous landscape of possible universes, and this has complicated efforts to develop theories of particle physics based on string theory. These issues have led some in the community to criticize these approaches to physics and question the value of continued research on string theory unification." - Source, Wikipedia

We’ve seen this “unification” on several of these Wikipedia topics concerning particle physics.  “Unified Field Theory” has never been proven.  It attempts to describe fundamental forces and elementary particles within a single field.  Einstein came up with this trying to unify the “general theory of relativity” with electromagnetism.

Interestingly, Tesla did not agree with the theory of gravity or Einstein’s “Unified Theory”. 

Tesla's explanation of the earth's magnetism combined with the pushing of the ether down on us makes a lot more sense than gravity, which incidentally Tesla did not buy into. He believed Einstein was a fraud, creating and getting lost in long mathematical equations that bore no resemblance to reality.” – Source, Wikipedia

Is “aether” the bondage of time?  Is aether that substance which Alice Bailey wrote about?  Does “aether” keep us from being “quickened”?  Or does it describe this?

Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature.   For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers:  All things were created by him, and for him:   And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.

So it’s not Laminin.  It is what makes Christ, Christ: the “image of the invisible God”.  God is “the Word” and Christ is the “Word made flesh”, being “in the image”, who was quickened in the death of the flesh.

We talked about “ether/ǽther” before.  It is a Luciferian-promoted substance and it is spelled with the Old English vowel for “Law”: ǽ. (See “They Breacheth A Wall” and “His Name In the Law”): The “law” that is “restored” through Christ.  Jesus redeems us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: the seed in the barn: the curse in the house in a vision of a flying roll.

Tesla was treated as the outcast, Tesla is the one who was stolen from while Einstein was exalted and coddled by governments.  Yet they are using Tesla’s own theories today, especially inside of CERN.

“Aether” was also called “Quintessence” (Quint = one/fifth, or five) for “fifth element”:

Five consistent versions of superstring theory were developed before it was conjectured in the mid-1990s that they were all different limiting cases of a single theory in eleven dimensions known as M-theory. - Source, Wikipedia

“Quintessence” then has at least one thing in common with “superstring theory”.  Eleven dimensions = M-Theory (Matrix-Theory? Or a decoy for something else?)

Quintessence is the Latinate name of the fifth element used by medieval alchemists for a medium similar or identical to that thought to make up the heavenly bodies. It was noted that there was very little presence of quintessence within the terrestrial sphere. Due to the low presence of quintessence, earth could be affected by what takes place within the heavenly bodies.[12]. . . Over the years, the term quintessence has become synonymous with elixirs, medicinal alchemy, and the philosopher's stone itself.[14]” - Source, Wikipedia

Anyone remotely familiar with the “Harry Potter” books will have heard the term “Philosopher’s Stone”.  It was made into a movie.  The Philosopher’s Stone was also featured in other movies although loosely based, such as “Jewel of the Nile” and “Romancing the Stone”.

"The philosopher's stone, or stone of the philosophers (Latin: lapis philosophorum) is a legendary alchemical substance capable of turning base metals such as mercury into gold (chrysopoeia, from the Greek χρυσός khrusos, "gold," and ποιεν poiēin, "to make") or silver. It is also able to extend one's life and called the elixir of life, useful for rejuvenation and for achieving immortality; for many centuries, it was the most sought-after goal in alchemy. The philosopher's stone was the central symbol of the mystical terminology of alchemy, symbolizing perfection at its finest, enlightenment, and heavenly bliss. Efforts to discover the philosopher's stone were known as the Magnum Opus ("Great Work").[1]" - Source, Wikipedia

The “Michelson-Morley Experiment” was about “luminferous aether” and led to the research into “special relativity” – something it is presumed that Telsa knew much more than Einstein; and the establishment couldn’t afford to let go public.

This theory presumed that sound and light must have a medium through which to travel, just as waves that traveled the surface of water:

"Because light can travel through a vacuum, it was assumed that even a vacuum must be filled with aether. Because the speed of light is so large, and because material bodies pass through the aether without obvious friction or drag, it was assumed to have a highly unusual combination of properties." - Source, Wikipedia

It was Albert Einstein who couldn’t “unify” the theories of Newtonian mechanics (theory of gravity) with Maxwell’s equations on electromagnetism and therefore led to the disregarding of the existence of “aether” and lean toward “special relativity”: but CERN is sure enough to spend billions of dollars over decades in search of it (The “Aleph detector”)  “Aleph-Beit-Beit-Aleph”: the beginning and the ending.

Strings and Cords

So them the M-Theory (eleven dimensions); “string” and “superstring theory”, Aether and Aleph are all connected; and possibly the same concept with slightly different but related aspects.  Is it “Aleph” vs “Aether”?

String Theory

Interaction in the quantum world:
worldlines of point-like particles or a worldsheet
swept up by closed strings in string theory.

CERN’s weird film “Symmetry” is possibly an announcement that they discovered something relating to their “bosonic string theory” which is actually “superstring theory”.  They are announcing the opening of these portals.  A dream when I was sixteen of pulling a string of gold caused the opening of this through which came the light of God.  I was “caught up”, I was blinded until I was “changed in an instant” and shown a new heaven and earth, our new “senses” and how they work, and how everything is connected through God and what He is.  But it wasn’t “of” me.  Faith pulled the string.  It was God who put the string there.

If a dimension is opened up, and it is not of God, what do you think is going to come through this?  And what if that is exactly what is supposed to happen for all to be fulfilled?  Isn’t it written to happen with the angel that has the key to the bottomless pit?

Five “consistent” versions of Superstring theory becomes “eleven dimensions” of “M-Theory”.  Five = quint = “Quintessence” or “aether” . . . or is it “Aleph”?  If “ae” is “Law”, is “aether” the “breath”?  Aleph represents both “a” and “e” in the “Old English” but is itself a silent letter.  

Jesus said “the kingdom of God comes not with observation, neither shall they say, Lo, here! Or lo, there! For behold, the kingdom of God is within you.” – Luke 17:20-21.

They are not going to find the answers within the box of the standard scientific model.  They cannot “produce” God with mathematical equations.  God is invisible.   They are trying to isolate Him in a Large Hadron Collider, but what they are going to get is not Him. 

The life-line; the “string” has to be thrown first.  It is the only way one can be pulled from the waters.  A man overboard cannot throw himself a life-line.  A man has to call for it; for God will not save the unwilling.

Ae: “As a word, can represent Old English ae “law” as in “God’s law”

Ther: “often thero, word forming element meaning “beast” -  from comb. Form Greek ther “wild beast, beast of prey”, from PIE ghwer “wild beast” (source also of Latin ferus “wild”, ferox “fierce”, see fierce), also from therio, from Greek “therion”.

The Beast:  The “curse of the law”.  And what was the origin of the word “time” again?

Time (n) –
Old English tima; ‘limited space of time’; from Proto-Germanic *timon ‘time’ (source also of Old Norse timi ‘time, proper time’), Swedish timme (an hour) from PIE root *di-mon, suffixed form of root *da –‘ cut up, divide’ . . .

PIE = “di-mon”.

Time = di-mon – to divide.

Maxwell’s Demon: Daemon, which “works in the background dividing molecules”, much like vaccinations (vac = cow/ox) were designed to do to the law in the human body.

Michael Jackson suffered from Vitiligo, Lupus and declining eyesight.  All three are results of autoimmune disease.  Autoimmune disease is caused by the corruption of the DNA.

Michael’s songs reveal a lot:  About how he was chosen, about how he was saved, and about what they did to him, his “form” and his “visage” . . . and his “sanctuary”.

The whole world watched it happen to him.  The whole world read the blame they put on him for it.

We know what scripture says was to happen to him and through him.

Now . . . the image I was sent -  What do Owls have to do with Michael, the end times Prince?


Continue to "Lichama"

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.