Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: The “Tau Event”

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Sunday, June 4, 2017

The “Tau Event”

Elath and Eloth

And when we passed by from our brethren the children of Esau, which dwelt in Seir, through the way of the plain from Elath, and from Eziongaber, we turned and passed by the way of the wilderness of Moab."

He built Elath, and restored it to Judah, after that the king slept with his fathers."

At that time Rezin king of Syria recovered Elath to Syria, and drave the Jews from Elath: and the Syrians came to Elath, and dwelt there unto this day."

On “The White Stone” we talked about the significance of the name change of Abram to Abraham, and Sarai to Sarah. 

That God had “established” a “covenant between me and thee” and thereby named Abram “Abraham” and Sarai, “Sarah”.  The “/h/” and “H”, the DNA and the hydrogen bond in our substance, the “cloud”, stumblingstone which is the chief cornerstone to those who believe in him.

Moses built the “Ark of the Covenant” after the pattern he was shown on the mount by God.

Jacob also was renamed Israel in scriptures as well as Daniel and his three friends, and several other prophets and priests changed their names.  Some of the cities also shared this same distinction. 

The changing of the language, and the association of the name “Elath” to that of the “Aleph”, came from a voice within.   I went on faith as God in all his loving patience, soon rewarded that faith by verifying this direction.

In the verses above, the name “Elath” appears these three times in the whole Bible.  In order of appearance, Elath is with Eziongaber in the “way of the plain” to Seir where Esau dwelt.  Azariah, son of Amaziah, son of Joash, king of Judah who was slain, built Elath and restored it to Judah.  After that the King of Syria recovered Elath to Syria, drove the Jews from Elath, and the Syrians dwelt there to this day.

In order of occurrence from Deuteronomy 2 through 2 Kings 16 Elath was in the land of Esau, then Judah who built it and “restored it” to Judah, then King Rezin “recovered Elath” to Syria where they dwelt to this day.

The phrases “restored Elath to Judah” and “recovered Elath to Syria” suggest previous possession by both Judah and Syria, with “Judah” having the distinction of having “built” Elath.  Judah’s mother Leah was the daughter of Laban the Syrian.

We know through the study of the scriptures that Rebekah, wife of Isaac and sister of Laban, was Syrian.  We know that both Leah and Rachel, wives of Jacob and daughters of Laban the Syrian, was Syrian.  Laban, Jacob’s uncle, was the son of Bethuel, nephew of Abraham, is also Syrian.  If the handmaids of Jacob’s wives, Bilhah and Zilpah were NOT Syrian, then even eight of the twelve tribes of Israel were of Syrian descent, which includes Judah and Joseph.

Therefore both Judah and Syria would have had “Elath” before Judah had been polluted.

How did Judah “build” a city that already existed on the borders of the land of Esau?

Elath = The Aleph/Alap.  

How did Judah “build” Elath if Elath is Alap?

The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be”.

And of course there is a difference between building on the “letter of the law” (Isaiah 44:13), and the “spirit of the law” which giveth life (John 6:63, 2 Corinthians 3:6) and has always been. 

In the first mention of “Elath” in Deuteronomy, Eziongaber is mentioned also as being in the land of Esau.  Eziongaber is Ezion-Gaber in Wikipedia

"Ezion-Geber is mentioned six times in the Tanakh . . . According to the Book of Numbers Ezion-Geber was one of the first places where the Israelites camped after the Exodus from Egypt.

According to Book of II Chronicles, Jehoshaphat, the King of Judah, joined with Ahaziah, the King of Israel, to make ships in Ezion-geber; but God disapproved the alliance, and the ships were broken in the port" - Source, Wikipedia and Scripture

Ahaziah is a different king than Azariah and his father Amaziah, both whom were kings of Judah.  It is one of the first places the Israelites camped after leaving Egypt with Moses.  This section summarizes the story of the partnership between King of Judah and King of Israel to “make ships”, which apparently God did not want them to do.

It says the ships were “broken in port” but what kind of ships were they?  Ships of the Chaldeans are those the Lord, your redeemer, the Holy One of Israel who was “sent to Babylon, for your sakes” brings down in Isaiah 43:14.

I searched "Eziongeber" for it’s meaning:

"In 1 Kings 9:26 (King James Version) it says:
And king Solomon made a navy of ships in Eziongeber, which is beside Eloth, on the shore of the Red sea, in the land of Edom.   According to Targum Jonathan, the name means city of the rooster." - Source, Wikipedia

Zion is in the first part of the word, so I seriously doubt it means "rooster".  Ezion = "e" (Latin for "out of") + Zion (fortress) + Geber = "mighty, strong, or valilant".  Ezion would then mean “out of Zion” + “Geber” for “Mighty, strong, or valiant”.  Targum Jonathan is the Talmudic tradition targum to the Nevi’im.

Geber, is the name “Eber” (great-grandson of Shem and whose name the Jews credit the origin of the word “Hebrew”.  Eber is also known as “Heber” and Eber means to “pass through” or “cross over” (Eber/Ibrim/Abram).

“The name Eber comes from the name “abar” meaning to “pass through”.  Note that the first title of “Hebrew” is bestowed upon Abram in Genesis 14:13.  The addition of “G” (Semitic “Gimel”), which is the third letter in Hebrew represents a “man in motion” but is promoted as the “camel”.  So to sum up the meaning of Eziongeber, would probably mean something like “he who passes through out of Zion

"Elath" = El + althanos (immortal or "not dead/without death").  It also sounds suspiciously like "Aleph/Alap", the first letter in the name of God.  The explanation of “Terebinth tree” just doesn’t add up.  God lead me to the reason why.

Seir = etymology on Wikipedia doesn’t add up either.  Seir is translated from a word meaning “rough/hairy” which is identical to the meaning of “Esau”.  It is sometimes used as an alternative for “goat”  as in “Seir La’Azazel” meaning “scapegoat”.  In Egypt and Biblical Astronomy “Seir” is used to refer to the constellation “Orion”, also an Egyptian God.  Seir and Syria are related.  Seir for “Seer” would be more accurate “in the eye” of the beholder.

I took note that "Elath" and "Eloth" are the same city, but they are spelled differently in the identically recited verses between 2 Kings 14:22 and 2 Chronicles 26:2.

I ran a word search through the KJV scriptures and the appearance of "Eloth" is just as scarce: also appearing only three times.

"Elath" appears three times, one of which of those are repeated accounts of verses; and "Eloth" appears three times.

Why are they spelled differently? 

The Usage of Elath and Eloth

The three verses in which “Eloth” appears in the scriptures are below:

And king Solomon made a navy of ships in Eziongeber, which is beside Eloth, on the shore of the Red sea, in the land of Edom."

Then went Solomon to Eziongeber, and to Eloth, at the sea side in the land of Edom."

He built Eloth, and restored it to Judah, after that the king slept with his fathers."

Below, 2 Chronicles 8:17 changes the spelling in the NIV (New International Version) from the King James Version.  Why did NIV change it back to “Elath”?

Then went Solomon to Eziongeber and Eloth on the coast of Edom. (KJV)

Then went Solomon to Ezion Geber, and to Elath, at the sea side in the land of Edom. (NIV)

The passage in 2 Kings 14:22 is identical to the recall of the same event in 2 Chronicles 26:2 with the exception of the spelling of “Elath/Eloth”:

He built Elath, and restored it to Judah, after that the king slept with his fathers."

He built Eloth, and restored it to Judah, after that the king slept with his fathers."

Remember the discrepancy of certain volumes of items in Solomon’s Temple a while back?  There is a discrepancy between the height of the chapiters in 1 Kings 7 and 2 Kings 25; and a discrepancy in the volume held in the “baths” between 1 Kings 7 and 2 Chronicles 25.  I wondered if the spelling of “Elath” and it’s change had anything to do with it.:

And he made two chapiters of molten brass, to set upon the tops of the pillars: the height of the one chapiter was five cubits, and the height of the other chapiter was five cubits:"

The height of the one pillar was eighteen cubits, and the chapiter upon it was brass: and the height of the chapiter three cubits; . . ."

The discrepancy in "baths":

And it was an hand breadth thick, and the brim thereof was wrought like the brim of a cup, with flowers of lilies: it contained two thousand baths."

And the thickness of it was an handbreadth, and the brim of it like the work of the brim of a cup, with flowers of lilies; and it received and held three thousand baths."

Elath’s spelling with the “Aleph” appears in Deuteronomy 2:8, 2 Kings 14:22 and 2 Kings 16:6.  The spelling with the “O” (Ayin) appear in 1 Kings 9:26, 2 Chronicles 8:17 and 2 Chronicles 26:2

Other than the identical event repeated between 2 Kings 14:22 and 2 Chronicles 26:2, the other two mentions of "Eloth" with the "O" spelling were in reference to Solomon and the building of ships in Eziongeber.

The other two mentions of "Elath" with the Aleph in the middle are in the telling of Judah, then Syria restoring or recovering Elath to their “land”.  The first Deuteronomy mention was in the land of Esau.  Abarim Publications explains:

Elath -
"The name Elath or Eloth is possibly an ancient version of the more modern (Biblically spoken) Hebrew word אלה ('alla), meaning terebinth. But it may also be a proper feminine plural of the same word:" -

According to Abarim “alla” means “terebinth”.  But the etymology states that “Allah” (also from the Semitic “Arabic”) means “Supreme being” in cognate with “Aramaic” “Elah” for “God “Elohim”.

Allah -
Arabic name for the Supreme Being, 1702, Alha, from Arabic Allah, contraction of al-Ilah, literally "the God," from al "the" + Ilah "God," which is cognate with Aramaic elah, Hebrew eloah (see Elohim)."

Therefore the story they are handing you on “Elath” meaning “Terabinth” is a bunch of hooey.  The Aramiac word “Elah” is “Elath”, also “Aleph”.  Why would they not want you to know this? (See article on "Elath")

Elath and Eloth - does the removing of the "Aleph" in the middle, replaced with the "Ayin" mean anything?

Is there a relationship between this "change" in the name and the discrepancy with the height of the chaptiters between 1 Kings 7 and 2 Kings 25, or the 2,000 baths and the 3,000 baths in the temple between 1 Kings 7 and 2 Chronicles 4?

Elath, Eloth, Aleph, Ayin

Elath – Aleph:  In Syriac the “Aleph” is pronounced “Alap”, without the ‘h’ at the end.  The word “ubba” is with the /h/ but with the jot for “silent”.

The modern, post-exile Babylonian Aramaic as modern Hebrew today is presented as this:

Modern Hebrew/Babylonian Aramiac

The modern Syriac is presented as this”

Modern Syriac

2 Kings 16:6 and 18:26, Psalms 106:20, Romans 1:23-25 witness to the change in the language and specifically, the name of God.

Ezekiel 4:4-6 reveals the letter of His Name, the LAW; and Jeremiah 11:9 reveals the conspiracy of the lawgivers (Genesis 49:10).

But that’s not all.

In “The White Stone” the question of the “H/h/” added to Abram’s and Sarai’s names was asked and answered in scripture.  In the words of the Lord it was the “covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee.”

And later, Moses built the Ark of it after the pattern shown him by God in the mount.

The /h/, the element between one rib and the other: the “covering”, the “cloud” the “covering of his wings”, or . . . the covering “not of my spirit”.

The “stone of offense”, the “stumblingstone”, the “chief cornerstone” to those who believed in Him: and for Abraham and many others, the “white stone” upon which He who sat on the throne would give to he who overcomes, and in the stone a new name written which no man knew but he who received it.

The /h/ was represented once by the aspiration mark, which Jesus described as a “jot” which now represents the “Yod” originally the “hand” and “arm” in pictographs.

Jesus said “I am the Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last”.

Jesus didn’t speak in Greek when he was on earth, why did he in heaven?  John wasn’t Greek either.  Why were those specific words used?

This is the Greek “Alpha and Omega”

Greek alphabet

Alpha Greek 19

The “Alpha” is translated from the Semitic “Aleph/Alap”.  But the Omega translates into the Semitic as the “Ayin”, not the final Aramaic letter which is the Tav/Tau.

Alphabet Hebrew Ayin O

The Semitic Ayin is “silent” also as is the “Aleph/Alap”, but indicates the vowel sound of “O” and sometimes “I”, notated by vowel points added by the Masoretes.  The O is the Greek “Omega” which is the last letter in the Greek, and if you remember from a previous entry, the “omicron” was credited for being part of the Greek Alphabet first, but the mathematical “Big O Notation” first used the Omega before replacing it with the Omicron.

Makes you wonder which came first.

The Greek Tau is at position 19.  In the image of the Hebrew letters what letter is in the 19th position?  The “Ayin”, minus the vowel points double letters, and the  Ayin position is 16.

The Ayin numerical value is 70.  But it is the Greek Omicron that is the value of 70.” – Source, “Inoculation” entry Michaelsguardian, February 2017”

Alphabet Hebrew jot explained

This was also interesting, that the “B” in Beit could also become the “Veh” sound as in “vav” with the addition of a “jot”.

So then the Babylonian Aramiac “YHVH” transliterated “Yud-hey-vav-hey” or “Yaweh” is actually the Syriac “ALEPH-HETH-BEIT-HETH” or “AH-BH”: Abba.

We know by these things and the genealogy of the root of words that they have done violence to the law.  They have tried to change the law of God into the law of man; and plagiarize the Book of the Law; to make a name for themselves in place of God’s.

Revelation 19:13 says that “His Name is called the Word of God”.

They have profaned His name “in the midst of” us:

And I will sanctify my great name, which was profaned among the heathen, which ye have profaned in the midst of them; and the heathen shall know that I am the Lord . . .

For then I will turn to the people a pure language, that they may all call upon the Name of the Lord”.

Jesus said “I am the Alpha and Omega” and “The beginning and the end, the first and the last”.

The Omega is has no equivalent in Modern Hebrew.  It is the original “Big O” replaced by the “Omicron” which shares the same position in the alphabet and the same numerical value (70) as the Hebrew Ayin (eye).

The “Omega” of the asserted Hebrew: the “ending” of that alphabet and the “last” letter is the “Tav/Taw”.  It’s Greek equivalent is the “Tau” which has a numerical value of 300.  It states it is taken from the “Phonecian” “X” and is the 19th letter in the Greek alphabet.

The Tau is asserted to be the symbol of the cross and symbolizing “resurrection” also a “mark” for those who “lamented sin”.  This is a lie.  We know this because of the scriptures:

The Tau is part of several names, such as “Taurus”, the constellation of the Bull/Ox in the heaven above us.

"Taurus (n.) -
zodiac constellation, late Old English, from Latin taurus "bull, bullock, steer," also the name of the constellation, from PIE *tau-ro- "bull" (source also of Greek tauros, Old Church Slavonic turu "bull, steer;" Lithuanian tauras "aurochs;" Old Prussian tauris "bison"); from PIE *tauro- "bull," from root *(s)taeu- "stout, standing, strong"

"Klein proposes a Semitic origin (compare Aramaic tora "ox, bull, steer," Hebrew shor, Arabic thor, Ethiopian sor). De Vaan writes: "The earlier history of the word is uncertain: there is no cognate in [Indo-Iranian] or Tocharian, whereas there are Semitic words for 'bull' which are conspicuously similar."

Tau/Turu/taeu/tora – Tora in Aramaic for “ox, bull, steer”.

David said:

Thus they changed their glory into the similitude of an ox that eateth grass.

And Paul said in his letter to the Romans:

Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

This agrees with Ezekiel 8 as God is walking Ezekiel through the temple with the “idols” of beasts and creeping things in the temple – much like the “seed” (DNA) of insects, rodents, pigs and “cows” are used to grow viruses injected directly into the blood (where the “life of the flesh” is – Leviticus 17:11).

Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen

The “Tau Event”

Credit: "Tau Innovation Conference",
May 7-9, 2017, Tel Aviv, Israel

This poses yet another question.  Just about every Christian scholar was taught that the language of “Hebrew” which is credited to the Jews, is what we are shown today.  Most know that the language was changed, but there is varying opinions as to what it was changed from.  Still they promote it as “the language” of “Israel”.

The scriptures reveal it is not, even in the Old Testament.

The Masoretes are the ones credited with establishing what is now agreed upon by “wise men” as the “Hebrew language”.  They are the ones who controlled the placing of “vowel points” in the language.

The majority of practicing Jews today consider the Babylonian Talmud as their “Holy Book” and the “Tanakh”, even as the majority of those claiming to be Jews are in fact, not.

The “Tanakh” is the “canonical collection of Jewish texts, which is also a source for the Christian Old Testament” according to the article on it in Wikipedia.

It states that most of the texts are in “Biblical Hebrew” and some in “Biblical Aramaic” (today’s Hebrew IS Aramaic), and that it is traditionally known as the “Masoretic text”.

The article in Wikipedia also states that the word “Tanakh”, which sounds suspiciously like “Anak” (the giants – Anunaki, ), is an acronym of the first Hebrew letter of each of the Masoretic texts three subdivisions of which are: “Torah” (teaching), “Nevi’im” (prophets: Nevin) and “Ketuvim” (writings: Ketu/shining, brightness; vim/force, power).

The Masoretic text was controlled/compiled by the Masoretes. 

The word “Mason” (Masor-etes) means “stone worker”:

The stone which the builders refused has become the head stone of the corner

For behold the stone that I have laid before Joshua; upon one stone shall be seven eyes: behold, I will engrave the graving thereof, saith the Lord of hosts, and I will remove the iniquity of that land in one day.

Genesis 49:24 (the blessing to Joseph)
But his bow abode in strength, and the arms of his hands were made strong by the hands of the mighty God of Jacob; (from thence is the shepherd, the stone of Israel).

And have ye not read this scripture; the stone which the builders rejected is become head of the corner”.

The Masoretes compiled and controlled the translation and the vowel points of the Tanakh, which begins with the Torah:

Torah (n.) -
"the Pentateuch," 1570s, from Hebrew torah, literally "instruction, law," verbal noun from horah "he taught, showed."

According to what we’ve researched so far by “scholars” assertions, the words “torah”, “Talmud” and “codex” mean “law, instruction”.

Why did they call themselves the “Masoretes”?

Why did they call their book the “Tanakh” after Anak?

Why did they call the first book, which consists of the Christian term “Pentateuch” (the five books), the “Torah”, after the bull?

"Taurus (n.) -
zodiac constellation, late Old English, from Latin taurus "bull, bullock, steer," also the name of the constellation, from PIE *tau-ro- "bull"

"Klein proposes a Semitic origin (compare Aramaic tora "ox, bull, steer," Hebrew shor, Arabic thor, Ethiopian sor). De Vaan writes: "The earlier history of the word is uncertain: there is no cognate in [Indo-Iranian] or Tocharian, whereas there are Semitic words for 'bull' which are conspicuously similar."

Even CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, with its “Aleph detector” and “vertex detector” attempted what they called a “four-tau event” on “Cracking The Code”.

Tau-Tau-ro, Tora, Taurus – in it’s various languages come from the same root: Tau/Taw, for “bull, ox, steer”.

The changed the truth of God into a lie, worshipping and honoring the creature more than the creator” – Romans 1:25

They changed their glory into the similitude of an ox that eateth grass” – Psalms 106:20.

The “Tau/Taw” is taken from the Semitic Phoenician Taw, “X”.

This is what the Masoretes said is the “Aleph”

Aleph (Ox) a Modified “X” (cross).

This is the “Taw/Tau”, from which
“Taurus” the Bull, and “Torah” comes

This is the Syriac Aleph
Representing the Greek “Spiritus Lenis”
The “Breath of the Spirit/Life, Breath of God”

Ezekiel 4:4-6 testifies to this, the “law” on it’s “side”: lay on the left for the iniquities of Israel, lay on the right for the iniquities of Judah.

Ecclesiastes 7:29 and 12:10 tell us that God made man to be “upright” and “that which was written was upright”.

Where is the “upright Y” today?

In the Babylonian Aramaic “Ayin”, which is cognate with the Greek “omicron” which was once the “Omega”.

Modern Babylonian Aramaic
The Ayin/Eye

Syriac Ayin - Opposite side of the Alap

They’ve twisted the language, the words, the meanings:   They have “polluted the sanctuary, they have done violence to the law” – Zephaniah 3:4.  David said in Psalms 106:20they changed their glory into the similitude of an ox . . .” and the name of their “Book” reflects that:

Oly, Oly, Oxen free? Or
Ali, Ali, Oxen free?

On March 8, this appeared on the news postings on Twitter.  It was a picture of the new statue of a girl facing the “bull” on “Wall-Street”.  Allegedly, No one knows who put it there.

Twt/Mar 8 bull

How did Elath become Eloth?  The Aleph and the Ayin.

Why in the King James Bible is the “Ayin” substituted in the passages pertaining to Solomon and his building of “ships”?

Ezion-Geber = “Out of Zion they passed through

As I was working on this entry, another announcement showed up concerning the “Bull” on “Wall-Street” and the girl facing him – someone added another statue:

Twt/May 31 bull

It’s a message I think, and not a flattering one.

Abram’s name was changed to “Abraham” to reflect the “covenant between” God and him and his seed after him.

Saul changed his name some time after he began his ministry, to reflect the change in him after his conversion on the road to Damascus.  His name was changed to “Paul”.

Simon was “surnamed” Peter by Jesus.

The girl facing down the “ox, bull, steer” on “Wall”-“Street” getting peed on by a dog reminded me of one of the most revealing verses in the Bible, where I first learned of the request by Eliakim for the Syriac language:

Then said Eliakim, the son of Hilkiah, and Shebna, and Joah, unto Rabshakeh, Speak, I pray thee, to thy servants in the Syrian language for we understand it: and talk not with us in the language of the Jews in the ears of the people that are on the wall.

But Rabshakeh said unto them, Hath my master sent me to thy master, and to thee, to speak these words?  Hath he not sent me to the men which sit on the wall, that they may eat their own dung, and drink their own piss with you?”

The names God gave Abram and Sarai reflected their new destiny.

The girl facing the “bull” has a new name.

In her calling, she pulled a cord during the standoff with the adversary.

When she did so, the house was consumed with the spirit of His mouth” and the  adversary “destroyed with the brightness of his coming”.

The dragon never devoured the man child brought forth in faith.

The name without the house (“beit/bayit) is “onnie”.

If you change the “Ayin” to the “Aleph”, it is “Annie” (Ah`nay).

The Lord gave the word: great was the company of those that published it.  

Kings of armies did flee apace: and she that tarried at home divided the spoil.   Though ye have lien among the pots, yet shall ye be as the wings of a dove covered with silver, and her feathers with yellow gold."

The “Breath of Life” is the breath of God.  Aleph/Alap is the letter of the law as Abba is letter of the expression of that law.

The “Spirit of the letter” of the law is only seen in the faith in God through works of that “expression” of that faith in Him, through us.  We are the witnesses.

I know you’re tired, all of you who struggle.  Your strength is in the Lord and His Word in you.  Take refuge in it and know this battle is already won.  It was from the very beginning.

1 comment:

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.