Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: Janet Jackson, Who Died?

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Janet Jackson, Who Died?

Truth or Consequences Part 3
His Stolen Childhood-What Replaced it

“3. Take heed to yourselves: If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him; and if he repent, forgive him.  4. And if he trespass against thee seven times in a day, and seven times in a day turn again to thee, saying, I repent; thou shalt forgive him.”

“41. And when he was come near, he beheld the city, and wept over it,  42. Saying, If thou hadst known, even thou, at least in this thy day, the things which belong unto thy peace! but now they are hid from thine eyes.  43. For the days shall come upon thee, that thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side,  44. And shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation.

The above is taken from Jesus, crying as he comes to Jerusalem because he knows they will not recognize him and what their fate will be.  A few verses down, Jesus is throwing the money changers and merchants out of the temple after which they plot to kill him.  Click the blue link under Luke 19:41-44 and you can read that whole chapter. 

They have done this to every threat exposing their lies, deceptions and plans.  Michael is one of them.  There are people before and after Michael trying to expose them and they were taken out of the way.

Yesterday I wrote about the teams of Liz Taylor and Arnold Klein and what they did to Michael.  I also talked about Diana Ross and we reviewed about four of Michael’s songs with the help of Blake who now won’t write to me because I disagreed with her on Lisa Marie (LOL, just kidding, she’s a working girl).

‘Scared of the Moon’ was the song that she looked into and I didn’t which is how and why this direction of the blog started.

There are some strange, geeze I don’t even know how to describe it but some subtle shifts are taking place and you can feel it just under the surface.

After two brilliantly clear, spotless blue skies in the last couple of days with dry comfortable air, I noticed this in the otherwise perfectly blue, cloudless skies over my house:

Chem Trails!
Could we be any more obvious about it?
Pink haze is older chem trail spread out

You Can see they're still working, bottom left of pic

Oh Yeah - Two! Two!! Two mints in one!!!

Criss-Crossing now . . . So the Weather Man knows what to report!

They don’t even care anymore that they look so obvious.  But that’s not what 
I’m talking about.  I’m talking about things online, like Twitter and Facebook and the absence of Jacksons, and little things like certain posts to my blog that appear to be friendly but really aren’t, and more wolves in sheep’s clothing who know I can’t be rattled by attacks so they try the “helpful” route.  That kind of stuff.  I’m watching and I hate to be suspicious but I am.

Back to Blake and her “find” on “Scared of the Moon”, this is what she had written me about another song I had only heard and not previously dissected:

Blake ‘s partial reply to me in an email:

You said you were going to be looking deeper into Scared of the Moon.  I do believe Michael was traumatized in Illuminati rituals.   You know that song, Blame It On The Boogie

My baby's always dancin' and it wouldn't be a bad thing
But I don't get no lovin' and that's no lie
We spent the night in Frisco at every kind of disco
From that night I kissed our love goodbye

What if Frisco's every kind of disco was like the Bohemian village where they do all those sacrifices and such?

Also, Michael says that his childhood was STOLEN from him.  I really don't believe he's referring to all the practicing and performing although it was tough. (Listen to 2300 Jackson Street.  It's a song of appreciation and makes reference to a group plan. ) He still was a kid, went to school and had friends.  What I really think was "they" altered his memories.   That would be stealing parts (even big parts) of his childhood.  He's stated he's had no memory of being loved.  He can't worship his mother like he does and not know she loved him.  Maybe instead he's referring to a lot of kids today that are just existing, their parents are too busy doing drugs, etc., to pay them any mind, but to relate, "they've" had to have done something there.  Also, I really don't think Joe was as bad as Michael had claimed.  I think "they" put those bad memories in his mind,  making him so scared that he'd throw up or pass out.  Most people think of God as a HE, thus if you can corrupt the FATHER image, you can damage the relationship with God.  Michael refers to God as SHE.  Oops - maybe that's why "they" had so much trouble?

I had gone over “Blame it on the Boogie” before, but Jermaine’s remake of it.  And of course I had a few people say “no, it was about having fun in a disco” . . . I just wanted to show you I am not the only one that sees what they see in Michael’s songs, for those out there that want to slap a “sex” sticker on it and call it a day.

That entry above was included in the previous blog I put up but this is the full paragraph.  I took note of what they were saying about the “father image” and corrupting it to damage the relationship with God.  Biblically this can also be backed up.

“8. But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.  9. And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.”

Memories . . . are these pictures from memories or was Michael trying to tell us something terrible was happening to him?

Pictures Michael Drew

See Power?

Shocked beyond recognition

We Know this one don't we?

Our eyes are the windows to the world (what about the soul?)

The Power of Thought

"Little me" - Chosen as a child for?????

Not to pick on the family (Lord knows they have enough to deal with) but one thing never, never made any sense to me.

During Michael’s “Home Movies” where Michael narrated through certain segments of his life, there was one portion where there was a black and white film of him and his brothers playing outside in the snow in Gary Indiana.

In that part of the “Home Movies” Michael is explaining that he and his brothers are out in the snow, that he didn’t like it because he was cold, his brothers were wrestling around in the snow and he “wanted nothing to do with it”.  And there is little Michael Jackson standing back from all the activity.

Michael looks pretty young in that picture, I would say about five, maybe six.  His brothers are not that old, ranging from single digits in age to early teens.  You can’t tell who is who because they are diving onto each other in the snow, but you know Michael because he is standing back with his cute little round head and earflaps hanging down from his hat.  Now here is what I noticed.

There are about four brothers clowning around and the one that Michael says is him standing back watching them.  This is before Motown because they are still in Gary, and judging by the size of Michael, quite possibly before “Steeltown”.  So if that is the case and I am even close on Michael’s age, I want to know one thing.

If Miss Katherine had a cow about buying new instruments for the boys who were at the time of that disagreement still touring the “Chitlin Circuit”, who was filming the “home movies” in the snow and how did they afford a movie camera? 

My grandfather had one and took some 8mm movies of family and there are some of my sister and I when we were tots . . . but we were my grandfather’s only grand children, he never raised my mother (he lived by himself, then later with his second wife who became my grandmother by marriage) and BOTH my grandparents worked.  He worked for Westinghouse and my grandmother worked for State Farm.  Both career people, no children, no other expenses but them and my grandfather’s trips to the track once or twice a month.

The Jacksons had nine children, Miss Katherine was not working after having the first couple of children (she worked at Sears according to Wikipedia, for a couple years).  It’s possible that someone else filmed them, but this is a blue collar, steel town ridden with crime according to Joe Jackson and any book the Jacksons have put out.  They were either impoverished before Motown or they weren’t.  Which is it?

In reading up on Janet I caught this from one of the interviews where she is discussing her fourth album “Rhythm Nation 1814” and fifth “Behind the Velvet Rope” (1814 being the year Francis Scott Key wrote the Star Spangled Banner, but I’m not buying that.  It means something else).  In this interview, Janet is described as the baby of the family, and barely seven years old when the family finally joined the boys in California.  Janet was seven years old when she first appeared on the Jacksons Variety show.

As a protected member of the family, why then would she have said this?

"According to Janet, "It's kind of like therapy...In the past, I've always found a way to not have to face the pain I've experienced growing up; I would brush it aside and keep going," she says. "But I'm at a point now where self-discovery has become important, and this album is kind of like a self-examination."  - Source, Janet Jackson Biography on

The pain she’s experienced growing up?  She did not go into detail on this interview.  Is this anything like the pain Michael’s experienced?  Latoya?

Janet left the Jackson house at age eighteen and married James DeBarge.  Michael was twenty six at the time and still living at home.  This would have been in 1985-1986.  Janet said “pain I’ve experienced growing up”.

The lyrics to one of the songs on “Velvet Rope” is “Together Again”.  Look at the lyrics for this song:

“Everywhere I go
Every smile I see
I know you are there
Smilin back at me
Dancin in moonlight
I know you are free
Cuz I can see your star
Shinin down on me

(together again, ooh)
Good times we'll share again
(together again, ooh)
Makes me wanna dance
(together again, ooh)
Say it loud and proud
(together again, ooh)
All my love's for you

Always been a true angel to me
Now above
I can't wait for you to wrap your wings around me baby
Oooh wrap them around me baby

Sometimes hear you whisperin
No more pain
No worries will you ever see now baby
I'm so happy for my baby” – Source, AZLyrics

Anybody want to take a stab at who she might be singing about here? 

Dancing in moonlight I know you are free?  I can see your star shining down on me?  Together again?   Good times we’ll share again?  “Always been a true angel to me”?  Now above?  “Sometimes hear you whisperin no more pain”?  “No worries will you ever see now”?  “I’m so happy for my baby?”

I have one question?  Who died?

This album was released in 1997.  It couldn’t have been Michael but who’s the angel?  Who’s whispering to her “no more pain?”  Who is Janet telling “no worries will you ever see now?”

I was not expecting this.  Yeah, oh yeah I cried.  I had to stop here for a minute.  The last verse says

“What I'd give just to hold you close
As on earth
In heaven we will be together baby
Together again my baby”

Michael filmed the music short “Blood on the Dance Floor” in 1997.  Prince was born in 1997.  Who died in 1996 or 1997?  To my knowledge none of Janet’s significant others died.  The only other person Janet could possibly be talking about in regard to “feeling no more pain” and “dancing in moonlight” and “always an angel” but someone in her family?

Latoya said “everything is an illusion” and “watch the Illusionist”.

I asked a couple of days ago, “How far back does the Illusion go?”

No, I am not suggesting that Michael died in 1996 or 1997.  There was a trial in 2005, right?  (Baby cried its eyes were like mine . . . take me shake me, somebody’s gonna fake me).  Michael’s HIStory Tour ended in October of 1997.  Michael was allegedly filming the short “Blood on the Dance Floor” in February of 1997 when he got the call that Prince was born.  This was right in the middle of the HIStory tour.  Did Michael really have time to plan and film music shorts in the middle of tours?  Michael said “HIStory” was his last tour.  He didn’t want to tour anymore . . . why?  What was the REAL reason?

(steaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaam!!!)  Who died, Janet?!!!!
(plan to work and work the plan…. 2300 Jackson Street)

(I have to really leave this for right now. I have a tape playing in my head on fast-forward, of images of Michael doubles, emails from people who dreamed of Michael doubles, clones, sharp-chin and round-chin Michaels, sick Michaels, healthy Michaels, three different Michaels in Bashir documentary, different Michaels in TII and we’ll discuss this MAYBE later.)  Come on Janet!   Tell me something!

Janet borrows lines from Joni Mitchell on one of that album’s songs, “Got Til It’s Gone”.  In the rap part of the lyrics, “Joni Mitchell doesn’t lie” is repeated and also in the Chorus.  Joni Mitchell is a folk singer from the late 1960’s and early 1970’s.

Another folk singer from that time period is Joan Baez.  Joan Jaez was called a communist by many conservatives (closet communists made these accusations, and the ignorant followers).  I always thought she was a very pretty woman but didn’t know much else about her background.  Maybe this will explain a few things?

Another artist singing about project Monarch is Joan Baez, the famous folksinger. In one of her songs, she clearly expresses how a person (herself or someone else?), who has gone through this unbelievable Satanic trauma, feels:

"You don't have to play me backwards,
To get the meaning of my verse,
You don't have to die and go to hell
To feel the devil's curse

Well i thought my life was a photograph,
On the family christmas card.
Kids all dressed in buttons and bows
And lined up in the yard.
Were the golden days of childhood
So lyrical and warm?
Or did the picture start to fade on the day
That i was born?

Let the night begin, there's a pop of skin
And the sudden rush of scarlet,
There's a little boy riding on a goat's head,
And a little girl playing the harlot.
There's a sacrifice in an empty church,
Oh, sweet li'l baby rose,
And a man in a mask from mexico,
Is peeling off my clothes.

I've seen them light the candles,
I've heard them beat the drum,
And i've cried mama, mama, i'm cold as ice
And i've got no place to run

So paying for protection
Smoking out the truth,
Chasing recollections,
Nailing down the proof.

I'll stand before your altar,
And tell everything i know,
I've come to claim my childhood,
At the chapel of baby rose" – Source, Lyrics007

I don’t think Janet Jackson was referring to Michael.  Janet Jackson had a reoccurring role on “Different Strokes”.  She has been around a lot of Hollywood children, like Michael.  Dana Plato died in 1999 of a drug overdose. 

Maybe she was singing about Brandon?  Marlon’s twin?  But he died at birth.  Maybe it was Dee Dee?

What kind of hell has the music industry unleashed?  John Todd is dead.  I don’t think he was the best speaker in the world, but his connecting Lucifer to music and musical instruments does not seem like such a stretch.

Blake had also sent me this:

Jimi Hendrix' manager, Michael Jeffrey, admitted to being an Intelligence Agent. Information was uncovered by Hendrix' biographers Harry Shapiro and Caesar Glebeek in their book, Jimi Hendrix: Electric Gypsy; from rock historian R. Gary Patterson in his book, Hellbounds on Their Trail: Tales from the Rock ‘n’ Roll Graveyard; and from John McDermott and Eddie Kramer in their book, Hendrix: Setting the Record Straight. The following is a summary of their collective findings:

Jeffrey often boasted of "undercover work against the Russians, or murder, mayhem and torture in foreign countries." Jeffrey’s father said his son had been stationed in Egypt years earlier and could speak Russian.

Friends of Hendrix suspected Jeffrey was crooked and they (the friends) confiscated documents from his office which indicated he was embezzling large amounts of money from Jimi’s concert performances. The friends gave the documents to Hendrix, who reportedly took legal actions to recover the embezzled money.

Michael Jackson has also reluctantly admitted to being deeply involved in the occult. He has his own special room with all the walls full of mirrors, where he lives out his occult practices and calls up demons from the spiritual world. He also has said he wakes up in the morning with a whole song in his head - lyrics and music - and he himself is in awe about it. -I didn't write this! Someone else did! I am simply the courier who brings the message to this world! Maybe it was the demons that possess you, who wrote those songs, Michael?” – SOURCE,

I don’t recall any interview where Michael admitted he was “deeply involved” in the occult.  But his songs have certainly bent over backwards trying to reveal the conspiracy to us!

The Bob Dylan Interview on “60 Minutes”

It's also known, thanks to former Illuminati programmed slaves who have succeeded to escape, that the Illuminati can pick a child, check for his/her talents, use that part for programming and create geniuses. This is the way NASA works. Their computer programs are so extremely advanced and difficult to learn, that the computer programmers and users must have a photographic memory to be able to remember the programs and programming. This is done by scarring the brain stem of the victim, an action which is known to create photographic memory. If the operation is successful that is, otherwise the victim may die. Those people, who have had their brain stem scarred, are then taught by NASA how to control the computers.

There are also other methods to create geniuses out of talents, and the Programmers use them all the time within the arts, military, science etc.

For those who want to research further into the origins of rock music, here is a starter:

"Since the launching of the Beatles as an international project via TV in 1963, "rock" has been the most influential recruiter to Satanism. Rock was created, and is still coordinated by Crowley’s followers and by the OTO network, in cooperation with WICCA. It is, not so incidentally, also the Satanist’s biggest money-maker, and believed to provide the chief logistical support for deployments and other activities of the OTO-WICCA efforts world-wide.” – Source,

That’s all I have for tonight.


Who died?


  1. Hardly hear Satan in Michael's songs,
    if all the lyrics were planted by "bad guys" - well, lousy job, baddies! He sang for God!
    I hear he tells about them, but not in a friendly
    Know what, occultism and everything is too far
    and misty, but his allergies stated during Murray trial
    really hinted us on something heavy that was done to him at
    some point of his life, why would he need a drug
    like that tried on him?
    So they messed with his head a lot, I'm just
    happy he stayed more or less true to himself and true to God. Bet he was a real warrior,
    none of us would survive as long...

    At some point I thought Michael was going to
    "die" around 2001. I thought his songs, especially
    those from Invincible and around, pointed at that. Not sure it was what it was.

    Many people died in 1997, people from industry
    I mean, how close was Janet to any of them?
    She's a private girl I guess.
    Officially "song is a tribute from Janet to friends who had recently passed from AIDS".
    What do you think?
    Later (2011) it was used as a tribute to MJ, now fits in

    1. Hi Anonymous,

      Satan in Michael's songs. I hope you know I do not agree with that article. The reason they did what they did to Michael for the most part was because Michael would not succumb to their agenda. They thought they had control of him, they really thought . . ." Some of those sights although I agree with their view of what was behind the music industry, I don't agree with their interpretations and they completely miss it with Michael. Michael was surrounded, but not controlled. They put him through hell trying to do that.

      Apparently Michael thought he was going to die around 2001 too, considering he wore a bullet proof vest to various public appearances.

      Officially Janet's song has been interpreted the same way Michael's songs have been "officially" interpreted. THAT is a personal song. She was close to someone who she is singing about there. The lyrics talk about having fun again and dancing in moonlight and being together again (how long had the family been apart? Latoya was not back home yet either), being in heaven, no longer in pain. Whoever this was about she was close to them. I thought at first it could have been Brandon (Marlon's twin) she sang about, but he didn't live long enough to "dance" with them. At the mention of angel, that got to me.

  2. Hi Bonnie , from what I read on the internet Janet's song Together Again Was dedicated to a friend of hers who died from aids.

    1. I'm not sold on that. It's too personal a song. With everything else we are learning about what the Jackson family went through . . . I have gone through Dee Dee, Marlon and Michael as possible subjects of that song. A friend? Possibly, but this is personal. It would have had to have been someone very, very close to her. ♥♥♥

    2. Hi Bonnie,
      Yes it was about a friend of Janet's who died of aids. Even Janet herself said this. It was quite risky at the time and her record company at the time 'Virgin' didn't want her to put the song out.
      Janet Jackson has always had a gay following and has had many gay, male friends.
      Do you remember the phone sex thing with Janet and Lisa Marie Presley called "Speaker Phone" on "The Velvet Rope" album?
      The thing is a lot of the elite of this world swing both ways and are into all sort of strange sexual stuff. Some are swingers. Normal people don't have a clue sometimes just what weird stuff the elite get up to.
      A lot of Janet's later songs are very sexual.

    3. Forgive me for doubting your word over any other anonymous person here, but how do you know its Lisa Marie? It does not sound like her. Where are all your sources for your claims? Phone sex? That is how you interpreted that? Speaks volumes of where a person's soul is.

      Janet Jackson is not a "swinger", sorry to disappoint you. And as far as Janet's "later sexual" songs, I recall the same misinterpretation being applied to Michael's songs.

    4. Hi Bonnie,
      Have you heard "Speaker Phone"? It is Lisa Marie Presley's voice. You don't know Janet Jackson. Lisa and Janet were friends.
      What are you feelings about gay people?
      I believe Janet Jackson is an abused, Illuminati 'sex kitten'. A puppet for the Illuminati. I also believe Lisa Marie is bisexual and was also abused as a child.
      Some think Janet Jackson is a 'cyborg', but I don't believe that, I think she is very human.
      Study the lyrics on Janet's later albums, they are very sexual and are not about God.
      Good dance tunes, and great music to make love to your partner, baby making music. I love Janet's music. And yes Janet does have a gay following, she says so herself.

    5. (Rolls eyes) - Whatever. Yes I heard speaker phone. I'm sure Lisa Marie was as big a friend to Janet as she was to Michael (that's sarcasm) Why isn't she credited on the album?

      I should have known better than do dare question your AUTHORITY and ask for REFERENCES or PROOF. How dare I when you know Janet so much better than I?

      Janet never sings about God. She worships sex and she worships gay people and she probably is a swinger (rolls eyes again).

      There . . . feel better now? Now go play. Let the adults handle this.

    6. Anonymous,

      If you will forgive my smart-a** comment I will at the very least look at Janet's later albums. She needs to be heard too. One of the interviews she did disturbs me. She has the same look in her eyes that Latoya did during her interview bashing Michael about the child molestation charges.

    7. Hi Bonnie,
      I've never met Janet Jackson and I don't know her personally. Why I think it's Lisa Marie Presley's voice on 'Speaker Phone' is from this 'You Tube' video:
      I own all Janet Jackson's albums and I've seen her in concert 2 times.
      Janet does not worship gay people at all. But some gay men like her and are fans of her and she does have some gay friends. Janet has said she thinks Lisa Marie Presley is a "Beautiful person".
      Janet is NOT to my knowledge a 'swinger'. Swingers have group sex and sleeping with each others partners and Janet is not known for doing that. But other elite people are into that sort of thing.
      I didn't say Janet never sings about God. I said on Janet's later albums there are a lot of sexual songs.
      I don't think Janet worships sex, but just enjoys sex and she also enjoys food.
      MK Ultra and the Illuminati are no laughing matter. I believe Janet is being used by the Illuminati to spread their agenda.

    8. Anonymous -

      That's the same one I listened to. That's not Lisa Marie. Listen to the last sentence and the accent on that woman's voice. I don't believe Lisa Marie and Janet were friends. There is no evidence of that. Michael said Liz was a beautiful person and look what she did to him.

      I don't have an issue with gay people and who they listen to. The way you posted your comment made it sound like I was supposed to believe that Janet was some sexual deviant swinger (and yes, that behavior is deviant, like it or not). I know what swingers are, trust me. I don't need an education on that, I got one during my first marriage.

      You said "Study the lyrics on Janet's later albums, they are very sexual and are not about God." - Would this be ALL HER LATER SONGS ON ALL THE ALBUMS? Just some, or one or two songs? Janet's album "Damita Jo" is labled "explicit" I don't see that label on her other albums.

      Let me ask you this, since you've seen Janet in concert twice and have all her albums -

      Do you think Janet was abused BEFORE "Scream" and "Wait a While" or just decided after learning what happened to Michael and Latoya just said "screw it, I'm selling my soul"? Because it seems to me that for someone who "studied" her, you kinda forgot that just maybe she might have a flipping clue about what happened to her brother.

      Perhaps she is "onto their game" and playing them "the same"?

      Anyhow, this blog is NOT about Janet's views on sex, swingers, gay people or Lisa Marie's sexual views, so if you please, I'd like to close the subject. Thank you for your (????) input.

    9. Hi Bonnie,
      See this interview Janet did with Oprah, she talks about her friendship with Lisa Marie Presley:
      I would of thought Janet does know what happened to Michael and knows about his death. Janet studied Michael's career. Michael and Janet were very close. I think Janet was abused from a young girl, she was trained up from young to be a performer. I think Janet has been under 'mind control'.
      But I think the Illuminati really got hold of Janet after her "Control" album, which was a big selling album. Have you heard Janet's album "20 Y.O."? or "Discipline"?
      The Illuminati still love Janet and they didn't like Michael in the end. So I guess she sticks with their program and doesn't rebel. I guess she is one of them. Maybe Janet does sing about God sometimes. I still believe a lot of her later songs are sexual.

    10. Wow that was short and sweet. Do you think they could have cut the interview a little closer, her head would have been gone.

      I dont' think Janet was bought after "Scream". Janet is an actress. I don't think she would have chosen Lisa Marie over Michael. And there is a reason I know this but it is probably something you wouldn't understand.

      I think, I think, I think . . . this is an attempt yet again to break up the family on my blog. I think she is NOT one of them. So the end of the argument stops here because guess what? It's my blog. Bye.

  3. BONNIE - This post makes me scratch my head though no "grey" substance was left inside :o) One : if true that Michael's childhood memories were stolen, when did "they" do it, you think ? Early 1980s, earlier ? Michael lamented publicly about his childhood mainly in the 1990s.

    Two : Diana Ross. As you earlier said, Ross wasn't much around Michael in the early 2000s, absent in 2005 & thereafter (if right). How come Michael put Ross's name on his (fake?) Will in 2002 as caretaker of his 3 children in case his Mother Katherine would pass ? Why not Rebbie or another family member ? Did Michael make a secret arrangement with D. Ross that we as public ignore or did her name on the Will come out of the blue to her ? Mysterious. Is Mrs. Katherine Jackson happy about that Will's arrangement for the children ? ..Hmmm..not, I'm pretty sure.

    The chemtrails I did not watch much but your house looks very nice. I like its windows:o)

    1. ROFL!!! Maybe it just changed color, hee-hee!

      "childhood stolen from me" . . . Well the "childhood" I would take that to mean when he was still a child, so not the 1980's. definitely before that. 1970's and 1960's I would think would be most likely.

      Did Michael put Ross's name on that will? It was reported that Michael absolutely did not even want to sign that will. (pre-Bashir, pre-9-11 but post Sony-Sucks). Some have reported that the "initials" were forged. Next to no fans believe that will is real and neither does the family. I think the only reason Branca put Miss Katherine on there as a family member was because of her age and to keep fans from calling foul outright.

      I do not believe that Miss Katherine is happy about the whole situation, period let alone the will. I'm sure she would much prefer he son home and safe. But she may know more than we do about that. No doubt they are still surrounded by handlers trying to control what that family knows.

      Thank you. That "window" is actually a sliding glass door and I'm standing on the deck, on a chair on my tip toes to get the view that I got there. The other building next to the light pole is a garage off the side of the house so you can see that the chem trails are from multiple planes.

  4. Anonymous -

    At your request I didn't post. In regard to S.D. there were tweets directed toward Paris and Steve Dennis that were brought up. I personally have nothing against the person you are talking about other than she does not seem to be Jackson-family friendly. I also find it to your friend's credit that she does not cow-tow to the Hoaxer "BeLIEve" community. Aside from that, if someone wants to post their link to my blog, I would appreciate the courtesy of asking me first. I don't post my link on other people's blogs. Just twitter and the facebook page of someone who gave me permission. That is it.

    I need time to research some of the things that are posted here because this is most definitely a spiritual battle going on. Just know when I make statements like that I am not singling out one or two people, I am taking notice of things going on in general. If I point someone out specifically I will mention there names or I.D's. I have no problem with that :o)

    Thank you. I'm not trying to hurt or bash those looking for the truth either.

  5. Hi Bonnie. Check out Hitomi Osanai's artwork of MJ. Wow, It's great. I am going back right now to get some more of her artwork.


    1. I love her work! I didn't look at all of them yet. She seems to favor delicate lines and I love her shading!!!! That one portait in sepia is awesome!

  6. Hi again. It's easier to check out Hiromi Osanai's artwork of MJ on
    Do you have any paintings of Michael on your walls at home? I wonder why MJ had paintings of himself everywhere at Neverland. He said that he hated to look at pictures of himself. He though he looked like a lizard. And he had never liked the way he looked. That was what he said on the tapes. So why did he have paintings of himself on the walls, then? I don't understand that? Do you?

    1. No, are you kidding me? I'm married. There's a limit to what my husband will tolerate and thus far he has been very supportive of the time I spend on Mr. Michael. The pictures I draw I sometimes get "the face", if they are pics of Michael or his eyes.

      Most of the pictures I've seen of Michael are from early 1990's - and earlier. In a lot of them he looks like he does in the Black and White film. It was 2001 when Michael complained to Schmuley about his looks. And the way things are looking, it's possible that Michael's impression of his looks changed depending on what personality they may have had triggered. He looks quite confident in many of his publicity shoots and on stage but on other occasions, he was not happy and you could tell.

    2. Oh, I forgot about your husband, ha ha ha. But do you think your husband would mind having an icon/legend on the wall. I bet he's listening to MJ's music on his way to work. By the way, together again is the only Janet Jackson song I have. I've always loved it. I love the video as well. I've never thought about it, but now when you brought it up it makes me wonder the same thing. Janet great song, I love it, always have, but who died?

    3. Hi Bonnie. If you buy a painting of MJ and your husband ask you, - Why have you bought this? You can always qoute MJ in "Living with Michael Jackson", - Because I love it. Look at the art. It's phenomenal. It's a work of art.

    4. I'm not asking my husband anything about any picture of Michael. My husband is a guy and guys don't have pictures of other guys hanging in their living room, LOL! We have the picture "Forgiven" by Ron DiCianni in our living room, pictures of our children and that's it. My husband would hang my art work, but I would probably be rationed to only one "Michael".

  7. I am about halfway through the book "Defending a King". Lots of contradictions (starting to get used to that). I have a question though for Miss Moriarty.

    If the reason Michael kept so much cash on hand because of intense fears of his children being kidnapped, then how do you explain Michael letting bodyguards that hadn't been paid in 4 months take them out in the public without him?

    The book is getting interesting. Very prescient in its overlapping explanations of the transitions of certain employees. But I have to stop and put my blog up for tonight.

    Mr. Michael how did you stay sane? (and did you?) Because truth be told? I can barely hang onto mine going through all this. If it weren't for the Bible backing up everything that's going on, well, I can understand why Latoya hugged it so tightly in the shower.

  8. BONNIE - Michael did trust his 3 bodyguards -2006-2008- otherwise he wouldn't let his precious MJ3 out alone with them : am I correct ?

    1. Line -

      Well lets put it this way . . . I HOPE you are.

    2. Aï-Aï-Aïe ! What's up again ?

    3. What's up? Contradictions as usual. It's like somebody opens a box of puzzle pieces, throws them at you full force and says "put it together" but the puzzle pieces are of a picture that doesn't even match the one on the box to help you out. Grrrrr! :o)

    4. Lol, ha ha ha……
      Well said. That is exactly what it is.

  9. Hi Bonnie. MJ wearing a mask is nothing new, right? But I found a picture of MJ and Frank Cascio sitting in a car. BOTH OF THEM wearing a black mask. Frank had sunglasses on too. Kind of strange? Frank wearing a mask.

    MJ was asked all kinds of weird questions during his career, but nobody ever asked him about the mask. Maybe the media respected his integrity and therefore never asked about that, he he.

    1. Heeeey Susanne!

      Frank Cascio and Michael wearing matching masks but probably for two entirely different reasons. Michael because its his trademark (trigger for him to keep quiet and not tell what he knows), and Cascio? Michael probably put it on Frank to cover his bad breath. :o)))

      I have a weird question for Michael, and it's weird because probably very few people have asked him this . . .

      Michael, which one of your siblings most resembles your personality?

  10. Michael . . . I just wanted to tell you today that I love you. I am not giving up. Each push of the shovel into the dirt unearths new horrors. I wish I could look into your eyes and tell you that, but I will have to just be content with the pair on my computer screen for now. Just know that I am doing that and telling you I love you. I want to protect you and this is the only way I have to do it right now.

    God Bless you♥

  11. Hi, Bonnie - I just sat down at the library to catch up on this, but may not finish it until I get home. But I am looking at Michael's sketches above and noticed the first one with the rhinestone glove. For a second I also thought he wrote "See Power" but the writing is cut off. It says SELF PORTRAIT, which is even more poignant, as the expression on both faces is so sad. The larger face - the adult Michael is thinking of his lost childhood, not just with sadness, but with some resentment that can be seen in his ruffled brow. The rhinestone glove seems to symbolize what he views as the public's only perception of who he is - the icon, as if that's the only thing he's valued for. Clearly unhappy for what he missed, and for being so misunderstood and undervalued.

    Michael was the most caring and giving human being on the planet, yet this self portrait is filled with sadness, humility, and a desire for love and attention. A picture is worth a thousand words, but Michael has an uncanny ability to give you the whole heart wrenching story. The glove is a symbol of Michael's iconic stature and success, but the adult and child's face tell another story. Never have I seen drawings that made me react this way, wanting to feel his pain and delve into his soul, and Michael has plenty of both.

    Michael, if you're reading this - I share Bonnie's love for you and desire to protect you where we could not before. Words are very powerful tools, and this is how we will continue to expose the corruption and torment you lived through that so many have tried to cover up. We have a huge lottery drawing that has reached $500 million dollars, and all I can think of is being able to donate most of it to fund several children's hospitals, and all of them dedicated in your name. You taught us not to be afraid to go for our dreams, and this is just one dream fantasy I am having right now. I would love to see your wonderful name on all those hospitals, but I know my chances of winning are lower than doing the moonwalk on Mars. Even if I lose, I will still be here for you. Always.

    1. Micheline,

      Thank you for observing that. You're right. The wording goes off the page but it does look more like "self portrait". And you noticing the younger Michael sitting over the head of the "Dangerous" era Michael with the Rhinestone glove . . . very astute. I have to agree with your assessment. Thank you for sharing that.

      You will like the blog I put up tonight. It's a little long but it is finished. I just have to add the pictures.

      I think anonymous up there, even though she seems to want to antagonize me, is right also about looking into Janet and her music. She's still out there performing seemingly not effected by Michael's absence. I'm not buying it. Regardless of whether anonymous thinks Janet is a cyborg (ridiculous) or not, if they got to the other Jackson's the most assuredly got to her.

    2. I worry MJ was the only performing Jackson who
      was able to fight a lot... The more successful
      performer is, more likely "they" will be right
      behind, trying hard to convert the performer.
      Who is the next successful Jackson? Janet :(

      BUT, but :) I know Janet's work enough, and I'd say
      her skill is great, she deserved to be where Madonna
      (in terms of popularity! Not in terms of imagery)
      is/was. Janet also can dance! Oh yes she can.
      They don't say it, but you can see how Janet's
      work inspired many many younger female performers,
      who look very "Illuminati" sadly. But that's irrelevant
      as I'm trying to say her success should be bigger,
      she was almost there, but somehow they "shrinked" her fast,
      while she's so not done - still capable of performing,
      very much so, her tunes are far superior to many other
      female singers in same genres, who do top of the charts.
      Well, basically I hope this suppressing of her real
      possible position means she didn't sell her soul like
      completely and managed to break couple rules?
      (and no, I'm not the same Anonymous above)

    3. I LOVE JANET. I remember in the 1980's when I was still watching MTV (when MTV was still MTV) and the early 1990's and I was more interested in Janet than Michael ('cause she was a girl and could dance like that). My favorite songs of hers were "Escapade" - Very fun tune, "What Have You Done for Me Lately", Rhythm Nation" and "Wait Awhile". You had women trying to sing power ballads and Janet was the only one that seemingly wasn't trying to be masculine. No matter what Janet does on stage she will always be feminine. She wasn't trying to be a man in a woman's body.

      Then you have Madonna, who was trying to a degenerate version of Michael . . . in a female body. Stark contrast.

      Janet was going strong until I would say right around the time they started tearing Michael down publicly. Janet is an actress, so whatever she had to do to confuse and contradict to keep from being victimized "within the scheme" kept her safe while the "Jacksons" were "planing to work and working the plan".

      Janet is only a year and a half younger than me and I can tell you two years ago I could not dance on my knees like that. (Janet? Help??? :o)))

      I don't believe Janet sold her soul. Nobody will be able to convince me of that, knowing what she knows and living what she's lived.

  12. Hi Bonnie,
    This song "Together Again" was Janet's dedication to all of her friends she lost to AIDS. She said they would be together again in Heaven.
    Janet Jackson told that this song was "Very personal for me. I lost a lot of friends and people that I worked with to this disease (AIDS). I caught drama for that too: Before I wrote the song, I told some of the people at the label (Virgin) the concept for the song, and they didn't think it was a good idea - 'I don't think you should do that.' I said, 'Why shouldn't I?' Because whatever, whatever. I thought, 'You know, this is really stupid.' It was in my heart."

    1. She's singing it in the singular though.

      Seems like there is an awful big effort to convince me that this is what it was about. If she sang this about people dying of aids, I could be persuaded that is was about one person, but this is awful personal . . . being together again, "you've always been an angel to me" is too much how Michael is described. Do you have a link to an interview where she said this? It's not that big a deal, but when someone is trying to convince me of something, references usually help. :o)

    2. Hi Bonnie,
      I've given you a quote, it's Janet's own words. I also saw Janet in an interview somewhere say the song was about a friends or a friend who died of aids. I don't have an agenda. Janet even wrote this on "The Velvet Rope" album sleave.
      I don't think back in the 1990s Janet knew Michael would die when he died. Janet now uses the song as a tribute to Michael which I find very sweet. But remember there are other angel-like people out there in the world. Not just Michael Jackson.

    3. If you are going to give me a "quote" please post the source. Otherwise if I have not seen it? It is heresay.

      The topic of Janet is done. And so are you. God bless and good bye.

  13. I hope this doesn't end up embarassing me, but . . .

    Does anyone know what this means?

    "i'm a lime to a lemon"

    I think it's out of a Beastie Boy song (Boston?)

  14. Bonnie asked -

    "Does anyone know what this means?

    "i'm a lime to a lemon"

    Bonnie, I looked up the phrase on Google and the only thing I found was a link to a website that showed .gif images of lesbian women "together" and other issues regarding gay women and men. It was done in a relatively tasteful way, not meant to be hard core. So I suppose the lime-lemon metaphor could stand for two people of the same "fruit" gender with slight differences. I don't follow the Beastie Boys, but are they gay? What made you ask the question...just curious :-)

    1. That's what I found too Micheline. It was a search term entered and I was like "what is that?"

      I don't know if the Beastie Boys are gay. And I don't care, LOL! I don't follow them either. It was just a search term and my own searches brought up the Beastie Boys son "Till Boston" and the urban dictionary definition.

  15. About Janet’s song...

    How sure are we that Janet never gave birth? That was a thought I couldn’t shake while reading the lyrics. And oh God I hope not but the fleeting thought of child sacrifice.

    But, when I watched the video...

    It has an American Indian theme. Miss Katherine is part Indian...Cherokee, isn’t she? Could it have been a grandparent of Janet’s?

    I grew up listening to Joan Baez, Bob Dylan and that era of music. Background on Joan Baez & Bob Dylan by Joan Baez:

    That Bob Dylan clip - "Bob Dylan Admits He Sold His Soul to the Devil”:
    The title is leading...and misleading, planting an idea. A 41 second clip of an interview is not a fair portrayal of what was said and in what context. Isn’t this the same kind of tactics we have learned about being used to plant lies about Michael? Isn’t this also how scripture is taken out of context and twisted to fit into belief systems?

    1. Truthbtold -

      You said "How sure are we that Janet never gave birth? That was a thought I couldn’t shake while reading the lyrics. And oh God I hope not but the fleeting thought of child sacrifice."

      I thought of that (lost child), but until I posted the other blog last night I did not think of child sacrifice. I hope not! God I just can't believe this that people can actually do this.

      Did you see what I posted about Joan Baez and her father?

      On Bob Dylan, I had also read that he had become a born again Christian, so I was wondering about the phrasing in that interview and I wondered if Dylan was really not trying to tell Ed Bradley what the industry TRIED to make artists do. But he could have also swung the other way. I would love to see the full interview but if it was cut like that I doubt I'd get much more out of it then what they made it look like.

      Katy Perry was a child of ministers too and she admitted to doing the same thing. "selling your soul".

    2. Rumors. This post is getting deleted.

      You guys must think I'm up to something. The tag-teaming lately has been tremendous.

    3. Oops, I hadn’t refreshed the page in a few days.

      "Rumors. This post is getting deleted.

      You guys must think I'm up to something. The tag-teaming lately has been tremendous.”

      Are you talking to me, Bonnie?

    4. Truthbtold - Oh no! It was the person who posted below you that I deleted. I wasn't talking about you, LOL! Sorry! ♥

  16. I've just deleted three posts on here, three anonymous, the same person. Somebody doesn't like what I'm posting.

    I'm getting the same trouble in email . . . .

    Wonder what's up?

  17. No idea who that is, but check tweets from March 30!/D_MartezShow
    "Guess who's in Louisiana right now? @Oprah and Paris Jackson, yep, Michael Jackson's daughter... Why? and Where?"

    Is it true?
    Oprah cashing (future ratings) on Jacksons again and again?
    MJ3 and Bobbi Kristina, her new best "milking cows"?

    1. Not sure. Guess we'll have to wait and see. Paris will eat her for lunch.

  18. "Did you see what I posted about Joan Baez and her father?"

    Behind, trying to catch up, again! I’ve begun reading your next post but have to get the Bob Dylan stuff out of the way first...getting to know the man.

    Yes, Bob Dylan became a born-again Christian and got blasted and jeered in the media for it. I remember. His most known song from that era is Gotta Serve Somebody.

    He is also a Jew, born Robert Zimmerman.

    Dylan wrote some of the most known songs of the turbulent 60s - the protest era, the most unified America has been in my lifetime. Standing together for a cause - end the war in Vietnam. (My brother and his friends were drafted. The ones who saw battle were never the same.)

    Many of Dylan's songs were made famous by various artists, including Joan Baez:

    Farewell Angelina, I grew up listening to that song a lot. Beautiful, haunting. While my brother was listening to Dylan, The Byrds, The Turtles, Eric Burden and The Animals, Hendrix, Beatles, Cream, etc. etc., my mom was listening to Joan Baez, The 4 Tops, Dean Martin, Bobby Vinton, The Imperials, Bing Crosby etc. I had a pretty well-rounded musical influence of the 60s.

    Learning as I go...sharing as I learn...

    16 minute, entire segment (?) of that interview may offer some perspective:

    The image people had of him: “It was more like a threat to society in some kind of way. It was like being in an Edgar Allen Poe story. You’re just not that person everybody says you are, though they call you that all the time.”

    About the media: “They’re not the judge, God’s the judge. ... I just figure they’re irrelevant."

    He talks a bit about his childhood and parents and why he changed his name.

    Dylan wrote “Blowin’ in the Wind” in 10 minutes.
    Bradley: Where did it come from?
    Dylan: It just came. It came from uhh, like umm, right out of that wellspring of creativity I would think. Ya know?”

    “I don’t know how I got to write those songs." "Well, those early songs were almost magically written.” “Well, try to sit down and write something like that. Um, there’s a magic to that... It’s a different kind of a penetrating magic.”

    He says he can’t do it anymore. “I did it once. I can do other things now but I can’t do that.” (I wonder if it has anything to do with the mysterious motorcycle accident he had?)

    The Hardships of Public Image:

  19. Bob Dylan can be cryptic and mysterious. He is very deep and seemingly secure within himself, balanced, says it like it is - sometimes in the manner of a puzzle. He’s a seasoned veteran who has given the world much through his music.

    We need to apply the same principles that we have been learning through Michael. My opinion.

    With that in mind, let’s examine his statement that has gone viral with people concluding that he “sold his soul to the devil”:

    “Well, it goes back to that destiny thing. I made a bargain with it a long time ago and I’m holding up my end.” “To get where I am now.” “Wi wi with the chief, chief commander.” “On this earth and in the world we can’t see."

    I don’t hear or see where he says he "sold his soul to the devil”. That is a BIG assumption, probably stemming from the brainwashing of society as a whole. My opinion.

    Earlier in the interview Dylan says what destiny means to him:
    “It’s a feeling you have that you know something about yourself nobody else does. The picture you have of your mind of what you’re about will (emphasis) come true. That’s the kind of a thing you kinda have to keep to your own self because it’s a fragile feeling and you put it out there somebody will kill it. So, it’s best to keep that all inside.”

    Is that so different from what Michael has said about people only using a small part of their brains? Wise advice, keeping it to yourself. Cast not your pearls before the swine.

    Where he is what sense? People assume he means money and fame but he doesn’t say that.

    The only CHIEF Commander "on this earth and in the world we can’t see” is God. Dylan expects us to think for ourselves. That’s what it seems to me.

    If you notice on that Bradley interview at and listen carefully to the editing. The camera cuts to Bradley for 3 seconds. During those 3 seconds, you hear Dylan’s voice BUT - “I made a” D “bargain with it a long time ago." Listen to that a few times. I believe that D (for devil) and possibly “bargain with it” was edited in, it doesn’t sound right. What “slogan” springs to mind whenever anybody says something about "making a bargain with" to get something or somewhere in life? The only part of this interview I could find on CBS is a 3 minute summary, ending with the "bargain with” statement that contains the same anomaly.

    A contract is also a “bargain” where people are expected to “hold up their end”. Maybe there is a dual meaning. Sony now “owns” Dylan, who was signed to Columbia. I suppose it would take a whole lot more research to know what struggles he may have had within the music industry. Going by his music and interviews, I don’t believe he is the type to compromise his convictions. Perhaps his house is actually built upon The Rock...biblically speaking.

    "In November 1994 Dylan recorded two live shows for MTV Unplugged. He claimed his wish to perform a set of traditional songs for the show was overruled by Sony executives who insisted on a greatest hits package.”

  20. Truthbtold,

    I saw the interview. The whole thing. I saw the interview with Joan Baez. I don't know what you think about her because you are mostly defending Dylan on here.

    You did look into Baez's background, yes? Joan Baez's father is New World Order UNESCO. Listening closely to her, I'm not convinced through her "godd*mns" and "f*ckings" that her "god" is the one of the Bible, of Christ.

    Make of that interview with Dylan what you will. In the Bible, do you know who the ruler of this world is? Jesus overcame the world . . . The devil. The devil has not been banished yet so guess who the "contract" is with? Why would that mean something different for Dylan then it would for any other artists who admitted to this in interviews?

    Revelation 12:9
    And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

    That is prophecy. Satan rules this world but not men, but his time is coming to an end. Read Revelation 11 and 12.

    Dylan may or may not have become a Christian. I'm not judging that. God knows. But his "holding up my end of the bargain" on his "contract" means just that. He is finishing it out and in that interview he was speaking in the "past tense". Either way, at one time that is exactly what he did. That came out in a strait string sentence on that interview. Joan Baez was probably his handler and at one point, he disassociated himself from her or stopped including her.

    It is also important to remember that when someone invokes the word "god" there are people in that industry (and in the world) that believe Lucifer is "God". I posted a video some months back where Jay Z was sitting in the studio talking about how "god" just funnels music through him, that he "stands back and lets 'God' walk in the room". Almost word for word what Michael would say.

    Ephesians 6:12
    For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

    Dylan may be "finishing out" his contract, but I'm with you that he probably does not like it.

  21. Truthbtold:

    Luke 4:5-7

    5And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time.

    6And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it.

    7If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine.

    How was Satan going to give Jesus the kingdoms of the world if he wasn't ruler of them?

    This is what he tempts people with, when he wants to use their talent. I will give you, if you will serve me.

  22. Well, ok then. That reaction sure took me by surprise.

    No, I hadn’t looked into Joan Baez’s background.

    "Joan Baez was probably his handler and at one point, he disassociated himself from her or stopped including her." Where did you come up with that?

    You seem to have ignored what sounded to me like a lousy splice job during edit within a crucial statement. I wanted to know what you thought, if you heard it too. But that’s ok.

    I wanted to know what you thought about how songs came to Dylan "almost magically" vs how songs came to Michael and Michael's fondness of magical things. But that's ok.

    Conclude that I am blindly defending Dylan, then throw a bunch of scripture at me like I'm an enemy attacking your integrity. A touch condescending. That’s ok. You must know, right?

    I am not convinced, that's all. I do not think the issues about Dylan or Baez have been sufficiently researched and presented on your blog to come to reasonable conclusions.

    Maybe I’m wrong about Dylan and that statement. It doesn’t matter. Truth will be revealed about all day.

    1. Truthbtold,

      Are you on medication or something? Why are you so testy? I did NOT "conclude" that you were "Blindly" defending Dylan. I said no such thing. I simply said I wasn't sure of your stance on Baez because you were mostly talking about (defending) Dylan. It wasn't an accusation.

      The Edit Job: - Well, here's what I HEARD

      Bradley - Why do you still do it? Why are you still out here.

      Dylan - Well it goes back to that destiny thing. I made a (duh) bargain with it. You know, a long time ago and I'm holding up my end.

      Bradley - What was your bargain.

      Dylan - To get where, um.. where I am now.

      Bradley - Should I ask who you made the bargain with?

      Dylan - [laughs], with,with,with, ehheh, with you know, with the chief uh, chief commander.

      Bradley - On this earth?

      Dylan - [smiling] in this world and in the one we can't see.

      So which "edit" are you talking about. Other than the "duh" between "I made a" and "bargain with it", it seemed pretty smooth to me. Which part of the "the one in this world and the one we can't see" am I supposed to believe is God?

      I didn't ignore anything except maybe your acerbic comment, which I will continue to try and do.

      Yes I heard the "duh". Do you think he said "devil"? It was weird, like right in the middle of his sentence.

      Sufficiently researched . . . okay. You want condescending? Take a look at the name on the top of this blog.

      Does it say "Bob" or "Joan"? No. It says Michael.

      I don't have time to dissect every single celebrity between 1062 and 2009 to your satisfaction. I told you who Joan Baez's father is. He worked for the U.N. and Unesco. I heard descriptions of Bob Dylan and Joan Baez from Joan Baez's own interview (T.V.) That is here:

      She explains how she took Bob under her wing. She also has a fondness for the word "Goddamn" and "Fuck". Not exactly family friendly.

      Satisfied? It's from the horses mouth so maybe that is good enough for you. Now go drink some more coffee. I'm sorry scripture is so offensive to you.

    2. Truthbtold -

      You really didn't think I was going to post that did you?

      Take a look at the way you said the things you said and ask yourself how else I was supposed to read that?

      Amongst other things, you accused me of "throwing" scripture at you as if you were an "enemy".

      Could it possibly have been ANOTHER REASON there, like maybe I wanted to back up my claim that the Bible says that Satan is the ruler of this world and NOT to attack you?

      If I cannot post references to what I post without you taking them personally, well . . . this isn't the first time this has happened, even in email. I'm supposed to be the paranoid one.

      I never said you were trying to undermine my blog. Never said that. Didn't even think it. I just disagreed with you on some points and POSTED reference (Biblical) exactly why. Geeeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzzzzzzze!


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.