Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences and then Reload this page!!!

Michael Jackson Justice: You Are The One - Michael's Mysteries

God: Reconnect to Him

The Conspiracy against God is about "The Word", and the profaning of His Holy Name within us. Adam fell in the garden, breaking the direct connection to God. Jesus, the "last Adam" was a quickening Spirit, the Word made Flesh, and the only one with whom we can re-establish our relationship with God. Michael's story is still unfolding. He is the one who is, is not. But Jesus is the only name given under heaven by which we must be saved. Many are trying to rewrite HIStory. We were given a help to instruct us. Learn more "here".

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

You Are The One - Michael's Mysteries

Unfolding the Mysteries of
The Seventh Son

And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.

She knew who He was because of the love she felt for Him, in an instant. 
At His feet, looking up into His face like a child to her father.
She could communicate with Him, without speaking. 
The spirit of each did the talking,
Read in the countenance of their faces
She said through the heat of a face filled with love
Drenched in tears of rapture,
without speaking
 “I love you, do you know that?”

It was an immediate response to the touch of her hand on his sandaled foot. 
And without voice, he responded. 
The power of his love lifting her into his arms.
Love fused her heart to his, they were now one
All tribulations over. All confusion moved away by truth. 
None of the illusion mattered because she made it over the threshold,
into the room to be with the One who saved her. 
Now she knew the reason for the tribulation.

One half bad of the other good, two beings,
both created, by the True God.
A choice we will have to make.

What God gives us, free will can corrupt but for true love?
A romance between God and the light he gave us
True love the sum of God and free will
Is souls exercised and freed from slavery.

To decide to love God.  To decide to love truth
to decide to love, genuine love. 
Not to own, possess or covet but to know in your heart
that you would give up your existence to again become one
with God from whence you came. 

Then experience when all is said and done the reward of both;
everlasting life, oneness with God.

If we cannot sacrifice ourselves
for the sake of the one who sacrificed his life for us,
then we will know death. 
To give up all, take up our crosses and follow him.

The marriage of the church bride and the Christ,
they become one. That is peace. That is fulfillment. 
That is genuine, undying love. 

The only wholesome ecstasy that exists is that union,
to be rewarded to all creation that chooses life
through sacrifice already made for us.

To sacrifice for love is to be rewarded
by the one who sacrificed for us. 
His example, in the flesh, the living word. 

To deny him is to deny genuine, pure love. 
To substitute anything else in place of that love
serves only to corrupt the soul, separating it further from God.

With this knowledge He sends her back into the world,
with the truth of the connection we have to all creation
still lingering in her senses.

“Stay on the path, keep your eyes on me
and know that I am with you.”

Bonnie Cox © 2012

But take diligent heed to do the commandment and the law, which Moses the servant of the LORD charged you, to love the LORD your God, and to walk in all his ways, and to keep his commandments, and to cleave unto him, and to serve him with all your heart and with all your soul."

On yesterday’s blog, I told you I would cover more on the subject of Origen.  There is controversy in his history with the development of the early church.  I am exploring but not without Scriptural reference.  And since this is out of my realm of study, I am approaching it cautiously.

The reason I am delving into this is because some of subject matter parallels the Bible.  We have to decide if it is to reveal truth or to deceive.

On yesterday’s blog, “Shell Game”, I posted the below:

********  Start  *********

“For those of you who don’t know who “Origen” is, (I didn’t know how to explain it since I’m only vaguely familiar with the term “Origenist”), I looked up some info for you:

Origen excelled in multiple branches of theological scholarship, including textual criticism, biblical interpretation, philosophical theology, preaching, and spirituality. Some of his teachings, however, quickly became controversial. Notably, he frequently referred to his hypothesis of the pre-existence of souls. As in the beginning all intelligent beings were united to God . . .” – Source, Patrides, C. A. (October–December 1967). "The salvation of Satan". Journal of the History of Ideas 28 (4): 467–478. doi:10.2307/2708524. JSTOR 2708524. reprinted in Patrides, C. A. (1982) [1967]. "'A principle of infinite love': The salvation of Satan". Premises and motifs in Renaissance literature. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. JSTOR 2708524.”

************  End  ************

When I saw further down on that same source that this man toyed with the idea that even Satan would be reconciled to God my ears (eyes?) perked up.  There are other, pagan religions that believe Christ and Satan were one at one time, brothers if you will.  However, that is not what caught me.  What caught me was the ambiguity of the child whom the dragon is waiting to devour in Revelations chapter 12.

3. And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.  4. And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.  5. And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.

Origen’s studies also fit in with the revelation yesterday concerning “Jesus Barabbas” (Jesus, son of the father) and Jesus the Christ (Jesus the Messiah), son of God.  From Yesterday:

The current critical text of the Greek NT (New Testament), following Origen, various ancient versions of the NT, and a number of Greek manuscripts, has Pilate calling him ‘Jesus Barabbas’ (Matt. 27:16-17).  The reading is not certain but is likely.   If it is correct, Pilate offered the crowd a choice between ‘Jesus Messiah’ (Jesus Christ) and ‘Jesus, son of the father’ (Jesus Barabbas).  See “Christ’ Christology’ Cross; Crucifixion. – Charles W. Draper” – Source, Holman, Illustrated Bible Dictionary, pg. 170

This was in the Bible dictionary.  In the Scripture that I have (King James, New King James, Geneva and NIT), there are ten verses that mention Barabbas by name, all of them in the Gospels.  None of them really go into detail about Barabbas’ background.  This seems to be obtained by the meaning of his name and the crime for which he was charged.

Mark 15:7 says – “And there was one named Barabbas, which lay bound with them that had made insurrection with him, who had committed murder in the insurrection.

An insurrection is a rebellion, so he committed murder during a rebellion against the Roman occupiers.  One writer on the history posted this:

Not only was Barabbas's first name Jesus, but his last name, Barabbas, means son (bar) of the father (abba). Jesus had always referred to himself as the Son of the Father (and his adversaries had always refused to acknowledge that he was). So now we had two men named Jesus, each a "son of the father", but opposite fathers, it would seem. Jesus was an innocent man about to murdered, and Barabbas was a murderer about to be set free.” – Source,

So we have an opinion that Barabbas was the opposite of Christ, or “the left and the right hand of the same source”, as was quoted in the movie “King of Kings” by “Judas”.  I could find no other such quote in scripture.

Another student of the bible had a slightly different view of the character Barabbas.

In books and movies, Barabbas is usually depicted as an evil criminal. But he may have actually been a freedom fighter in the Jewish resistance to the Romans. Evidence for this can be found at Mark 15:7, which says that he was in prison because he had taken part in a recent uprising. In fact, some biblical scholars think that he was an important rebel leader. If so, this would explain why the crowd shouted for his release, because any leader in the fight against the hated Romans would be very popular with the common people.” – Source,

Further down, this writer explains that in older texts of Matthew, Barabbas was written as “Jesus bar Abbas” (Abba means father) or translated to “son of the father” which ironically is how Jesus was also referred, as son of the Father, or son of God.

From this evidence, many scholars have concluded that Barabbas' original name was "Jesus bar Abbas". Other evidence indicates that this name was intentionally altered by later Christian writers. One well-documented case involves the scholar Origen, who reportedly promoted the change for reverential reasons, because he didn't want the name "Jesus" to be associated with a criminal.” – Source,

Is this another instance of foreshadowing of things to come?  If we read Daniel and Revelation, I don’t know how anyone cannot see it.

Is this the same example of Michael Joe Jackson and Michael Joseph Jackson?  Similar names, one a mirror image of the other?

This takes us back to “Origen”, whom I touched on yesterday.  Since he is reportedly known for taking a literal view of the Bible, I wanted to see what he had to say.  Origen is charged with the change in “bar Abbas’s” name to keep the name “Jesus” from being associated with a criminal.  But the possibility exists that he was not a criminal, only a freedom fighter.

Here is the information on Origen:

Origen, allegedly trained in the school of Clement and by his father, has long been considered essentially a Platonist with occasional traces of Stoic philosophy. Mark J Edwards has argued that many of Origen's positions are more properly Aristotelian than strictly Platonic . . .” – Source, Wikipedia/Origen

Origen viewed God as a being with creative powers and believed that God created a vast number of pre-existing souls, before the world was created.

God created a great number of spiritual intelligences. At first devoted to the contemplation and love of their creator, almost all of these intelligences eventually grew bored of contemplating God, their love for him cooling off. Those whose love for God diminished the most became demons. Those whose love diminished moderately became human souls, eventually to be incarnated in fleshly bodies. Those whose love diminished the least became angels.” – Source, Wikipedia/Origen

Origen was very much a believer in Jesus Christ:

One, however, who remained perfectly devoted to God became, through love, one with the Word (Logos) of God. The Logos eventually took flesh and was born of the Virgin Mary, becoming the God-man Jesus Christ.” – Source, Wikipedia/Origen

Origen also believed that a person’s condition/existence on earth (if they were poor, rich, sick or of good health) had to do with a soul’s free will even prior to their being an earth (consequences of the condition of the soul).

While I do disagree with that, what it said in the paragraph below that made me want to research his opinions (emphasis mine):

He was, indeed, a rigid adherent of the Bible, making no statement without adducing some Scriptural basis. To him the Bible was divinely inspired, as was proved both by the fulfilment of prophecy and by the immediate impression which the Scriptures made on those who read them.” - Source, Wikipedia/Origen

Further description of Origen’s studies reminded me very much of Michael and his attraction to truth, and love of knowledge.  He also reminded me of my search for relational information in seeking the truth, putting a puzzle of information together to help lead to that truth.  Origen even sought out the meanings of names in the Bible and the deeper meaning implied in Scriptures. 

This is what we have been TRYING to do here to make “these mysteries unfold”.  I was interested in the “Christ/Bar Abbas” story and the possible foreshadowing of the event to come in relation to the child in Revelation 12, who was to be devoured by the dragon and was instead caught up to God and to his throne.  There is a struggle between good and evil evident in that verse.

There is also the foreshadowing of the mimicking of God, the prophecy of Christ (in Daniel) and the prophecy of the return of Christ in Daniel, Jesus’ prophetic statements in Matthew 24 (repeating Daniel) and Revelation.

So now I take you to Daniel and a few verses we’ve covered before.

And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the daily sacrifice, and they shall place the abomination that maketh desolate.”

And the king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done.

Here the angel is telling Daniel that they will place the abomination of desolation and take away the daily sacrifice.  This happened with the crucifixion of Christ, but will also happen in the future when the beast declares himself God above all else and proclaims his covenant in the temple commencing the abomination of desolations.  Jesus foretells this in Matthew 24:

When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:)

Whoso readeth, let him understand marks the importance of this event to take place in the future, not just in Jesus’ time.  Mark tells us the same thing again, with the warning to “understand”.

But when ye shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing where it ought not, (let him that readeth understand,) then let them that be in Judaea flee to the mountains:

Here Jesus is telling us, the reader to understand the foreshadowing to help us recognize the season of the end time tribulation.

Jesus also tells us in that same chapter that it is not until AFTER the tribulation that the “son of man” – the Messiah returns and not to be fooled by false Christs, as is echoed in Revelation 17 and 2 Thessalonians 2.

(Michael spoke to Jesse Jackson in an interview about “the same pattern” that he told him of “these people in the past”)

In the next chapter of Daniel is this familiar passage, expressing post Christ prophecy – telling Daniel of what is to happen close to the end times:

And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.”

This deliverance does not happen right away, but this event of Michael leaving is a sign that deliverance draws near.  The evil is no longer restrained and in this resulting tribulation we are to see as the “time and the season” of his return.  In Revelation we have corresponding testimony to the prophecy matching the warnings above in Daniel and Matthew:

And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.”

Here it explains the devil waiting to take the child for himself, for his use.  Since Christ had already been crucified by the time the new Testament had been written, this would have to be about the coming of someone else, even though this does also match the Gospel’s account of the devil trying to tempt Christ in the wilderness.  God wants us to see the pattern here for a reason.  It has already happened, and it will also come to pass in the future.  History repeats so that we will recognize it.

This is the reason they try to re-write it. This is why the history books are changed and “lie” as Michael tried to tell us in both his Harlem speech and in his song “HIStory”.

How many people have to die, before chose to live the prophet’s plan . . .

But I will shew thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince.

The passage above corresponds with with the passage below in Daniel 9.  Could this be a clue that “Michael” and “Christ” could be one and the same?  Jehovah’s Witness and Seventh Day Adventists believe this.  It is also footnoted as such in the Geneva Bible. 

Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.

It is in Matthew 17:11-12 that Jesus tells his disciples they did not recognize Elias as John the Baptist when he was before them.  Not only does this evidence a form of reincarnation or the continuance of a spirit to pass on God’s message, but Jesus again wants us to know something of how God will work.  The disciples did not recognize Jesus when he arose from the dead and met them as they hid either.  He had to show his scars to them. 

Jesus walked with them and followed them, asking questions in Mark 16:12-13, and in John 20:25-27, and Luke 24:14-31, and they did not know him until he showed Thomas his scars and the hole in his side or broke bread with them and their eyes were opened.  It’s actually a cute story if not for the seriousness of the prophecy.

(“He did NOT die . . . he can come back . . . only Michael Jackson . . . because he can transform” – three year old boy in this video below)

Below, Revelation 12:5 describes a “man child” who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron.

And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.

In Revelation 19, we find out who that man child is:

And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.

14. And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.

15. And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.

 16And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.”

Back to Revelation 13 we find that the beast is also given power over all the nations, tongues and kindreds, and  the power to make war with the saints and to overcome them, but it doesn’t say “rule with a rod of iron”.  It almost appears as if the two entities appear to be blended or interchangeable

And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.

8. And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.

Jesus and the great prince “Michael” (whom it is believed in Daniel to be the Archangel Michael) appear to be one in the same – Jesus is the “shepherd” of the children and “prince” Michael is the one who “stands watch” over the children “of your people”.

In Daniel 12:1, Michael “stands up” after which a time of trouble such as there never was since there was a nation, commences.  This is a sign of the end of the time.

One of the clues is in Daniel 9 above, which tells us that Michael is the “only one” of the Princes in Persia that stands with God “in these things”.

Jesus returns “with the voice of an Archangel” in 1 Thessalonians 4 –

For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first:

Jesus’ Ministry

Similarities between Michael and Jesus (not Barabbas) are spooky.  Even as Michael was portrayed in the press as the one with psychological problems, and people trying to control him or family trying to take control of him, this was apparently the same challenges that faced Christ Jesus as he began his ministry.

Jesus also eventually left the family, was surrounded by “disciples”, the main twelve could be looked at as his “hangers on” or his “students”. 

Jesus was tempted in the wilderness by the devil.

Michael was tempted throughout his music career as evidenced in “Dangerous”, “Dirty Diana”, “Blame it on the Boogie” and a number of other songs spread over his career.

Not everyone that hung around Michael was bad.  Some were helpers.  Michael’s “handlers” could have been compared to those the Pharisees and Sandedrin sent to infiltrate Jesus followers, gather information and betray him as Judas Iscariot did.

Judas Iscariot committed suicide (or was he killed after trying to give his 30 pieces of silver back?)

Evan Chandler, the first major betrayer of Michael killed himself after Michael’s passing. 

On another page of the site was something else I found familiar:

When Jesus left home to begin his ministry, other members of his family appear to have disapproved. According to Mark 3:21, they said that he was "out of his mind", and some of them attempted to "take charge of him" and bring him home. Matthew 12:46-50 indicates that he refused to talk to his mother and brothers when they tracked him down and tried to see him. And John 7:5 says "even his own brothers did not believe in him.” – Source,

And when his friends heard of it, they went out to lay hold on him: for they said, He is beside himself.  22. And the scribes which came down from Jerusalem said, He hath Beelzebub, and by the prince of the devils casteth he out devils

Above, Jesus’ friends in his own city thought he was “troubled”, and in John 7:5 below, his own brothers questioned him, even though his mother was visited by the angel before he was conceived.

“His brethren therefore said unto him, Depart hence, and go into Judaea, that thy disciples also may see the works that thou doest.

4. For there is no man that doeth any thing in secret, and he himself seeketh to be known openly. If thou do these things, shew thyself to the world.

5. For neither did his brethren believe in him.”

Oddly enough his brothers were also of the opinion that good works were advertised or promoted. 

We’ve heard stories of Randy trying to crash the gate Michael’s rented Vegas home, the “interventions”, and attempts to keep him within the family.

While I’m still of the opinion that the attempted interventions were to get Michael out of the hands of the bad guys and that the drugging of Michael did go on, here we have what could possibly be the MIRROR of the situation with Jesus, whereas the people that surrounded themselves around Jesus loved him and the ones trying to infiltrate had evil intentions.  With Michael, the ones surrounding him had evil intent while the ones trying to infiltrate – “intervene” loved him and were trying to get Michael out of their hands (out of the jaws of the dragon).

So now when I read Daniel, or Matthew 24 or Revelation, I can see the MIRROR that the scripture wants us to see.  The foreshadowing is a mirror of what will be repeated from history. 

The contrast between the mirror image between the one who commits the “abomination of desolation” and the one who made the daily sacrifice obsolete; the mirror image between the “beast” and the “anointed one” and the mirror image between the child that the dragon is waiting to devour and the one that is caught up to God and his throne.

Does the heart reveal the proof, like a mirror reveals the truth, see the evil one is YOU . . .” – Michael is telling us.

Am I the beast you visualized?”  Sounds almost like a taunt.  They didn’t win.

This time around, I’m taking no sh…” – He came as the lamb, he returns as the lion.

But “somebody’s gonna fake me” and “Here I stand, I’m the light of the world I feel grand . . .” also are clues.

And we in that generation are asked not to be asleep, to have open eyes and ears, and to “let the reader understand” . . . we are going to HAVE TO discern between the mirror image and the real thing.

It is quite possible that when Michael sang “This is It”, that he meant this “really is it, this is it . . . the final curtain call . . .”  And we have been called to wake up.

Is this "It"?  Or is this the "Strong Delusion"?

We will continue this tomorrow.


  1. Hi Bonnie,
    I love the song "Starry Starry Night".
    I've been reading up about mind control, brain washing, hypnotism and MK Ultra. Bonnie do you believe Michael was a victim of MK Ultra and/or mind control?
    By the way Karen Faye is back on Facebook and she is building up a small community of people on her page.

    1. Hi anonymous,

      Oh, so do I. That is a beautiful, beautiful song. It reminds me of Michael's "You are Not Alone and "Stranger in Moscow".

      Yes, I do believe he was a victim of Mind control (MK Ultra/Monarch) as well as probably other members of his family, namely Latoya and Janet.

      Karen Faye and Facebook . . . hmmmmm, she's right on time. Keep watching. It will get interesting.

    2. Hi Anonymous,

      I posted your comment so I could answer it, but I will delete it because of Karen't facebook page link. I don't want people thinking I'm promoting it. I took a look and for someone who posted that "this is not a Michael Jackson Fan page" she seems okay with friends with fake names that include "Michael" in their names, LOL.

      Karen Faye = Right on time. Well in case you HAVEN'T been sent this info, the Jacksons are going on tour starting the end of June of this year and right over the London (ZION) Olympics in which many people suspect SOMETHING will happen.

      Karen has a public facebook page. They also have a private group page and for some reason, Faye is now coming out of the closet with a public page. There is other things under the surface going on. I can't watch them all.

      Janet Jackson - I have a video where she talks about abuse. I will be posting it here in the next few days. I wonder what happened with Corey Feldman. They make an announcement and nothing ever gets done.

      Thank you for praying for Janet. I'm really nervous. So much turmoil.

    3. Hi Bonnie,
      Karen Faye recently wrote this on her new public Facebook page:
      "To those requesting friendship status; I require a message of introduction, your real name, and real photo of yourself, if I do not know you personally. This is not a Michael Jackson fan page. This is my personal fb page. Thank you."
      Karen keeps changing what she writes. Before she was saying she wanted peoples personal email addresses, if she doesn't know who they are. Karen has talked about how her and her friends on fb are getting on with their own lives. Karen doesn't seem interested in Michael Jackson and getting justice for him anymore.
      I did not know that 'The Jacksons' will be performing at the "London Olympic Games". Randy Jackson is not performing though is he? I am very worried something bad will happen at the London Olympics!! Maybe a fake alien invasion?
      It's hard for me to keep up with what all the people connected to Michael Jackson are doing. I did not know Janet Jackson has spoken out about that she was abused. I did not know Janet had been abused.

    4. Hi Anon,

      I did see that on her page. Karen built up her "friend" base using Michael's fan base, so its nice of her to "throw them away" now that she's built up her's and Zilkie's business through that same fan base. Faye's job was to distract attention away from Sony along with TINI. They did that (for some). They have other agendas now.

      No, the Jacksons will not be performing at the London Olympics (to my knowledge). They will be doing their tour over the same TIME the Olympics is going on. I don't know about a fake alien invasion . . . maybe something closer in comparison to using the "Cirque du Solei - Michael Immortal" tour" to diefy John Branca. Heard about that from a friend that attended the Cirque show. Rather disgusting - the "Branca Immortal" tour? Hope he felt that he got the worship he's always coveted from Michael's fans. Envy was never so blatantly exhibited. Way to go, Branca! Can you moonwalk?

      Janet did speak of being abused. More on that later.

    5. Hi Bonnie,
      The song "Starry Starry Night" really fits Michael Jackson and his life, it's makes cry.
      Do you think Karen Faye was ever about getting justice for Michael Jackson's murder? I now feel Karen Faye was never really a friend to Michael. It's very upsetting.
      What is Karen Faye and the TINI peoples agenda now??
      I heard there maybe a fake alien invasion at the London Olympics 2012, or they may introduce us to the anti-Christ who will appear to be good. I'm very worried about the London Olympics.
      I find Karen Faye's new fb page odd. What does M.O. mean?
      I don't want to see 'The Jacksons' perform live because without Michael Jackson and Randy Jackson it just wouldn't be the same. Sometimes I wish it was the 1970s again as they were more gentle times back then.

    6. Hi Anon,

      I think that KAREN thinks she was about getting justice for Michael. There is information on the 2010 blog entries about the stunts that she pulled. If you go up to the search bar and type in Karen Faye's name, you will find a plethora of information about what she asked me to do, and what her and her Ganesha Om group were about. No not justice for Michael. More like covering the butt of her employer, Sony.

      Their agenda has not changed, only their form.

      Fake Alien invasions = "showing all signs and lying wonders -

      2 Thessalonians 2:9-12
      9Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,

      10And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

      11And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

      12That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness."

      Maybe this is it?

      M.O. is acronym for Modus Operendi or Mode of Operation - Their blue print, their pattern of behavior.

      Just my opinion but I think the Jackson Brothers do just fine without Michael. They have beautiful voices, but honestly, they would probably prefer to sing with him as well.

      1970's was a time of slumber. As much as I wish for more innocent times, I'm actually really happy I am awake and you should be too. There are better things coming. Have faith. ♥

  2. BONNIE - First your poem for the Love of Christ is incredibly beautiful & outside this Blog, should be read more largely in spiritual places.

    Origen : Since today only, I know who he was & retained this from Wiki "Logos & Cosmetology" : "Likewise as to Origen's anthropology, man conceived in the image of God is able by imitating God in good works to become like God, if he first recognizes his own weakness and trusts all to the divine goodness. He is aided by guardian angels, but more especially by the Logos (God) who operates through saints and prophets...".

    As to Origen's phenomenal knowledge & rich life around 200 after J.C., I always wonder how it was made possible to keep through the ancient books all the invaluable knowledge & life records whether from Origen or even much more ancient scholars. Much was destroyed in wars or deliberately before & after J.C. but the essence of knowledge transmitted by these scholars or prophets is still there today : conscientious archivage transmission over the centuries but somehow divine intervention also : Jesus' Light is also known after more than 2 millenia.

    1. Hi Line,

      Sometimes its hard for me to determine on a piece of information, if it is "introduced" and made to look like old, hidden information, or if it is indeed old, hidden information that deceivers try to make us believe is new/corrupted truth.

      This is why reading the Bible is essential to verify things. Yes, there is possible removal of texts from original manuscripts but when separate info is paired up with what is in the scripture (as in Enoch being quoted in Jude and 2 Peter, even though no Prophecy of Enoch appears in the Bible today) You can verify that at least SOMETHING was supposed to be there.

      I found something else in Enoch too in regard to the way Christ is described in the book of Enoch, verifying Bible New Testament that he is from God, and that the archangel Michael is quite possibly closer to God than the other angels.

      It also lends to the credibility that Enoch may have been purposely put aside, knowing that the Pharisees and corrupted Jews would seek to destroy this book. But still more study on this has to be done.

  3. I just ran across this on my facebook page, watched the whole thing, then went into another room to cry so my husband wouldn't see me (he's in bed now).

    It's occurred to me the insensitivity of some in this country, who assume that just because a person has a laptop computer, that they are not poor, or don't worry about not having enough to eat . . . as if watching your government incentivize the company you work for to send your job overseas would in any way render you unworthy of having something you bought the year before you were laid off.

    There are people living "in the richest country in the world", in sewers, "tent cities" and in abandoned cars with their CHILDREN! And it could be me or you or your children and their families in an instant.

    In Biblical times, living in tents were commonplace and people were HAPPY about it - because it wasn't looked down on. But when it happens to hardworking people who previously were "respectable" people and did things HONESTLY before the very things they worked for were stolen from them, it makes it that much harder to listen to a fat -ass beaurecrat talk about giving our children the privilege of mopping his son's bathrooms!

    1. ..."Bringing back child labor" and "Hard work is the answer". It's already unbearable to hear from 3rd world countries. And now child labor proposed by an ex-wannabe President candidate in the USA ? I once said I would not comment on US matters, but this man & many of the Establishment living in palatial domains should be thrown rotten tomatoes at & be sent to social community hard work, just that they at least know once what hard work means ! But in some key Euro countries like France, poverty also rose since mid-2000s although in 2007, the newly-elected Mr. Sarkozy promised he would be "the President of the Purchasing Power". Many French homeless also live in tents in forests around Paris.


      Hard work : what did all these Presidents really do (not only in the USA) during 5 years ? For the young ones & their struggling families I would like to be reasonably optimistic but I hardly can. Next : riots, wars ?

    2. Wow, thank you Line for posting those. Can I use these on a future blog?

    3. Yes you can ! ..Euuh I meant : yes of course :o)

  4. I want to thank David Edwards and Deborah Ffrench for sending visitors. Thanks to their claims of hate and jealousy I have learned that they are still about 500K viewers behind me on their blog. Same old M.O. If you call someone out lying, it's a jealousy thing.

    :o) - Well, if that is your claim to fame, then have at it. King of the Liars is not a crown I ever coveted from you. Any friend of Taraborrelli is no friend of Michael's and you've done a great job in reporting old news. I'm sure Aphrodite Jones is very flattered that you spent the last almost three years republishing her book on your blog.

    1. LOL.

      They read, everyone reads. All the religious swift
      on so many blogs and forums recently, Bonnie, I suspect
      because of your blog, too ;) I think it's good, because God
      is such an important part of Michael's life that
      can't be overlooked anymore, so I think it's good actually.
      Even if authors are not always "into it", but rather
      do it for extra clicks, some readers may look deeper and
      understand Michael better.

      ...and will end up here :) Like I did.

    2. Maybe not just this blog, there are others out there that began by letting Michael speak, and you can't get past the Michael - God relationship if you listen to ANY of his speeches or interviews. That is what made me fall in love with him when I previously was not even a fan.

      Those that are now writing about his faith in God and his "Christianity" are the same ones who used to attack me when I wrote about it two years ago. I still have copies of that correspondence and those "web forms" they filled out on my "" site with their I.P. numbers. I have not forgotten who they are.

      I agree with you though, even within their communities and blogs, writing about it NOW, there is always the possibility that someone within their group is having their heart softened. Perhaps even the blog or forum administrators. There is that, then there is also the very real danger of them taking this turn and using it to missappropriate that understanding.

      Jesus even tells us:

      Matthew 24:24
      For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.

      I really hope people do their own researching. Really! I'm not always right either, but about Michael's heart - I feel yes I am. I would not be here otherwise.

      Thank you for coming. ♥

  5. Bonnie, thankyou for your reply to me on the previous blog. I think i understand it all a bit better now. Kind of.... oh, such a tangled web they weave!!!!

  6. Hi Monika,

    If you are referring to the comment you posted about Raffles . . . there IS more to that story, but not the one THEY are putting out. I see Raffles as a comic character. There is a reason he is suddenly getting attacked and when you see his photo being "shopped" to those of other celebrities, somethin's up.

  7. Hey Bonnie.

    I have read all your posts about Michael from the day you started and I got to say you are amazingly intelligent, God bless you.

    I do have some questions though if you don't mind;

    1) What are you trying to prove in this blog about Michael and the connection in him with the Bible and Jesus and Prophets? I can feel Mike has a spiritual attraction on him but can you tell me where your going with this?

    2) I have read about the "False prophets" and stuff, by the explanations and the way Michael lived his life, I am really uncertain about him... And sometimes the way you described how he dresses, he is ADVERTISING the Satanic world.. Don't get me wrong, I been a MJ fan for mostly all my life. I admire all he does he is the king, but I can't help but notice that the people that like him are really "obsessed" with him.. They like worship him, worship may be a wrong word but anything the fans do they have to relate it to Michael for example; Today is Easter! Happy Easter everyone!(And then they post a Picture of Michael) and have to refer it to Michael instead of Jesus's reincarnation.. Do you know what I mean? Like they wake up on Facebook, they say "Good Morning!" and the FIRST thing that comes out of their mouth is Michael, not GOD, not JESUS, Michael... I am starting to get suspicious.. Is Michael really a guy that leads us AWAY from God? Everything the fans seem to do blocks out God and brings Michael in.. He was human after all.

    3) Again please don't get me wrong I love Mike from the bottom of my heart the greatest man that I can never aim to be. Last question.. Is Michael really disillusioning us as hes the "Good" guy but really in his lonely heart there is evil. In his song "Is it Scary?" he says:

    Am I amusing you
    Or just confusing you
    Am I the beast
    You visualised....

    Then he says...

    But if you came to see
    The truth the purity
    It's here inside
    A lonely heart..

    He is fighting the Evil off but I think he failed.

    Again my apologies if I offended anyone by this, I just wanted to get my true thoughts out..

    God bless you and thanks!

    1. Hi Michael,

      I'm glad you posted this, because I have gone back and forth over this for a year. I have CRIED over this, praying, asking God to show me, because you are right. What you said in your post is exactly what I've seen, and I can tell you my own family has slammed me over this.

      I am getting ready to post a blog tonight that should address at least some of the confusion or at the very least, help people find the truth themselves. I can only report. But God has to reach the heart. Now in answer to your questions:

      1). There is nothing for me to prove. That is not my job. My job is to make comparisons and intice people to do their own reading of the Bible. Get to know God and his character. You will learn alot not only about God and Christ as a human being, but also about Michael and what he's about. You will also very strongly see why they wanted to get rid of him. Michael's and Jesus's stories are very similar.

      2). This is a compound question. You posted partial lyrics to a song Michael recorded and wrote. I do not believe Michael failed in fighting off evil. If he did, they would not have tried to kill him. The "Am I the beast you visualized" is a question. He's taunting them. THEY FAILED, not Michael. Look at the lyrics of the whole song:

      "But if you came to see, the truth the purity, its here inside a lonely heart . . . so let the performance start".

      In the Bible, the book of 2Thessalonians chapter 2 talks about God sending a 'strong delusion'. I quoted part of it above 2 Thess. 2:9 - 11And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:"

      You can read the whole chapter here -

      Intelligent? Me? Uh . . . not of my doing. The good Lord giveth and the good Lord taketh away, LOL! I used to be able to balance a checkbook. Now I can't even find the doggone thing! :o)

      God bless you to and thank you for posting this question. ♥

    2. Sorry, Michael I missed a chunk of question 2 -

      I referred to 2 Thessalonians 2. In mention of Michael's emblems, clothing, album covers, it's one thing to surround someone with evil, it's another to be able to penetrate the heart. This is where I believe they failed.

      Another Bible verse I've quoted here is Revelation 12, 1-7, where it talks about the "child" whom the "dragon" is waiting to devour, but the child is caught up to God and his throne -

      Michael Jackson, if you go by his song lyrics (the only form of communication from him they could not corrupt), you will find that Michael Jackson matches the description of the character in Daniel 12:1, Revelation 12, 2 Thessalonians, Revelation 17 and most of the Gospels.

      I am taking his songs and matching them up to Bible prophecy. Before, I bristled when anyone suggested Michael was "divine". But after watching the news unfold since last spring and watching the world follow the Bible and it's timeline of events, I realized this is not JUST a Michael - event. This is ALL OF US.

      I've also had to go back and re-read some early blog entries where I describe how I embarked on this whole experience, from the time I first realized I love Michael and the first time I heard him describe Jesus in a deposition, and the loss of innocence. I got it.

      That's not something the bad guy is capable of doing.

      The delusion? Michael's other song I've quoted often, "This time Around, I'm takin' no....." and in the adlibs "Take me, shake me, somebody's gonna fake me" . . .matches with Daniel 10 and Matthew 24.

      I have pushed this away but the truth is in there. Either Michael is showing us in the most creatively inspired, interactive way ever, or he is a Major part of HIStory in the making.

  8. Thanks for replying Bonnie!

    I stil did not get about the connection people feel with Michael.. I am mean I always tell myself am I overdoing it? I love Michael how can he be a bad guy? I can never turn away from him its really hard for me... He has me spell locked or something I can feel it deep in my soul. Something tells me in my head this is right and another tells me this is wrong.

    I have something to add too..

    You know the Earth song Mike sang?

    In one of the verses he says -

    "What about all the peace that you Pledge (Promise) your only son?"

    - He is questioning or mocking Jesus and blaming him for not bringing peace. As it says in the Bible :

    God loved the world so that He gave
    His only Son the lost to save
    That all who would in Him believe
    Should everlasting life receive.

    And if you watch a live performance of Earth song.

    He acts like IF he was Jesus. He even has people kiss his hands?

    In that line "That you pledge your only son?" He is talking about Jesus and how he did not bring the peace as he told us he would so Michael in the live song Overshadows Jesus and he becomes the savior.

    And in the background of that song people keep saying "What about us!" But who else could he be questioning other than God?

    I believe that song is a complete mockery to Jesus.

    He makes it seem like its a good song and a caring song but really you have to pay attention to the lyrics, now imagine people sing this in Churches! Billions of people young and small sing this.

    What are your thoughts?

    1. Hi Michael,

      You said something key here:

      "Something tells me in my head this is right and another tells me this is wrong."

      Michael has fought this battle too - "Here abandoned in my fame, Armaggedon of the brain...." The stronger your faith, the clearer the answers. God doesn't "hop to it" on our wants and needs either. Patience is the universal machine of our faith. God moves us through things, sometimes without answers right away, to strengthen that faith as I am learning (because I have no patience) :o)

      Earth song is absolutely about God. You've seen the short film for that correct? Why do you assume he is mocking Jesus? He is lamenting. Do you know David in the Bible? He called out the same thing, crying, pleading - this is what Michael is doing in "Earth Song". "What about us" is Michael's way of asking God to remember his children who have been suffering patiently. At the end of the film Michael's very effective scene of the the angel releasing the winds and God renewing the earth. It's a very powerful film and it fills me.

      The live performance of Earth song - Well, where else are they supposed to kiss him? Michael mostly hugs I have not seen anyone kiss his hands but so what? Jesus' apostles kissed his cheek and his hands, they washed each other's feet, Timothy (I think) rested his head on Jesus' chest. People kiss the Pope's ring/hand all the time and he's less deserving than Michael in my opinion (this is going to tick some people off....)

      "That you pledge your only son" - he's not being disrespectful. Why would you insist on reading it that way?

      When I prayed for understanding in my bed, crying and asking God for understanding, I got angry and I asked him "Why didn't you protect him?". I was not mocking God or blaming him. I got a kiss on the cheek that to this day I cannot explain to people that don't believe that things like that can happen.

      You believe the song is a mockery of Jesus? I don't understand why. It is thinking like that refused to believe Michael was innocent of the crimes he was accused of. It happened to Christ too, falsely accused and crucified for crimes against Caesar.

      I did pay attention to the lyrics. If I judged those lyrics by the standards in which you are judging them, we'd have to throw out practically every old Testament prophet as a mocker of God.

    2. Michael,

      You said - "He is literally making people look like he is somewhat of a God. On my studies of Christian belief, does it not say;

      The only way to heaven is by Jesus?

      Have we not been warned about false Prophets?"

      .......... Did you ever watch "The Passion of the Christ"?

      Did you ever see a play where someone portrays Jesus?

      Did you think that THEY thought they were God or trying to be Jesus?

      Why is Michael being so scrutinized under different standards then? He is dramatizing a story on that stage just like any other play about God or Jesus. I used to go to the "Sight and Sound" theater to watch the Bible stories played out there and never at any time believed that the actors thought they were Jesus.

      You said - ""Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him."

      Michael sings about the Earth and how we are destroying it."

      We ARE destroying it. That film is not against people. It is about the power of God. Are you discounting the ending? Who is that blowing through and renewing everything? People? No. Lucifer? No.

      You have to understand that the other side is also using Michael's image/music/speeches etc and deliberately twisting them just like they have tried to do with the Word of God.

      I'm sorry, I've seen parts of t hat series you posted and while I agree with a majority of what they put out, I really don't have time to watch it all :o) I search out specific things needed from a Biblical basis. Everyone seems to have parts of the puzzle.

      Thank you. Now onto your next comment :o)))

    3. Michael another thing to point out.

      In the Earth Song film, you see all these people from different cultures falling to the ground on their knees, all praying (crying at the same time).

      This is what God asks us to do in the Bible. These people, with their eyes closed, beseeching God, praying and Michael's song basically voicing their prayers and what they are praying. Then the wind comes.

  9. Also I told people in my life that Michael resembles Saint Michael the Archangel (Peace be upon him) I really do believe Michael is St.Michael. But people called me crazy LOL. And yes I do see his resemble to Jesus Christ (peace be upon him) Maybe that is why I can't hook off Michael? I don't want to loose the light. Also you might think I am Christian or Catholic, but I am not :) I am a branch oh Islam but I believe in all you Christians say about Jesus Christ (Peace be upon him) I am not Muslim just a branch called Druze. You might be confused on how I know all this stuff about Christians and the Bible but I study all Jewdism, Muslim and Christians. I believe after all we are all one and just because I am Muslim I can bash Jesus (Peace be upon him). God bless you and thanks for creating this wonderful blog!

    1. Michael,

      To the best of my knowledge, true Muslims do not bash Jesus, so I would not expect that you would either. I'm not a big studier of Islam but I did study as much as I had time to while researching for this blog. From what I have read out of the English version of the Qu'ran, they do not believe Jesus was divine but they believe he was an important prophet and also recognize the virgin birth.

      Oddly enough in our Christian Bibles, a blessing was bestowed upon both Isaac and Ishmael. And both Christian and Muslim religions have been infiltrated by deceivers.

      I have read this:

      "The Israeli Druze are a religious minority in Israel. In 2004, there were 102,000 Druze living in the country.[38] In 1957, the Israeli government designated the Druze a distinct ethnic community at the request of its communal leaders. The Druze are Arabic-speaking citizens of Israel who serve in the Israel Defense Forces. Members of the community have attained top positions in Israeli politics and public service.[39] They live mainly in the north of the country.[40]
      [edit]Beliefs of the Druze

      The Druze are considered to be a social group as well as a religious sect, but not a distinct ethnic group. Also complicating their identity is the custom of Taqiya—concealing or disguising their beliefs when necessary—that they adopted from Shia Islam and the esoteric nature of the faith, in which many teachings are kept secretive. Druze in different states can have radically different lifestyles. Some claim to be Muslim, some do not. The Druze faith is said to abide by Islamic principles, but they tend to be separatist in their treatment of Druze-hood, and their religion differs from mainstream Islam on a number of fundamental points.[41]"

      .......... Is this true? I don't know a whole lot about Druze, so I am asking. I don't want to make assumptions.

      God bless you as well. Thank you for being honest.

    2. Bonnie.

      To what part do you mean is this true the Israel part? Yes there are most Druze in Israel because we are a minority in Lebanon that Israel opened its arms for us because we had no threat to them, we live with them better then we live with the Arabs. Syria is on our other border and it caused us more trouble than Israel. But I am a Arab I do not live in Israel, at the moment I am in Canada I was in Lebanon but I left because of the War in 2005. And yeah about the Druze complicating their religious Identity, it is somewhat true because we have a wide history of Muslims hating us and killing us because we don't adapt to what they want. They say we ARE full Muslims but we say we are our own religon, they don't like that.. That is why Druze people are safer in Israel, the Muslims really do dislike us if you want to put it that way. Because we are a minority group we tend to stay quiet. Hope that cleared things up. As for the first paragraph of your reply.

      Oh I had a few Muslims in my time that had hate for Jesus (Peace be upon him) I am not pasting this on ALL Muslims, alot of them respect that he is a Prophet and that is all.

      I thought I would comment on this because Michael reached out to all religions of the world and all races and I believe he is the only one who could do a miracle like that. I mean my beliefs may not be the same as yours but I do feel captivated by the beauty of it.

    3. What I was actually asking is the claim in that article was that Druze was an esoteric religion, kind of like Kabbalah but branching from the Muslim base.

      The Muslim's that I have spoken to or emailed with claim that the Muslims that hate Jesus are not real Muslims but are corrupted - radical if you will. I don't know if real Muslims would hate Druze, but from what I am reading about the history of Muslim's there are some that claim that they were also infiltrated beginning with one of Mohammed's wives (Almost like a Solomon scenario), where one of his wives caused Mohammed to interject mysticism/Summarian occult practices into their religion.

      When looking at the similarities in symbolism and numbers with the Masonic Temples, you cannot deny the similarities. The Shriner's is a Islamic arm of the Masonic Temples.

      I will look more into Druze. Perhaps they are the "Kariates" of the Arabs?

      Interesting conversation.


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.